DOCSLIB.ORG

Some Thoughts on Names from My Own Experiences As a Recorder

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Some Thoughts on Names from My Own Experiences As a Recorder Some thoughts on names from my own experiences as a recorder Uncertain Confused Delicate Anomalous Suspected Me on a bad day? Some thoughts on names from my own experiences as a recorder Uncertain Hoplodrina octogenaria Confused Apamea furva Delicate Mythimna vitellina Anomalous Stilbia anomala Suspected Parastichtis suspecta No, just vernacular names of five noctuid moths. Most of my recording is of: Lepidoptera -- macro-moths and butterflies -- micro-moths and non-marine molluscs. Merveille du Jour. This is its “English” vernacular name, which translates to wonder/marvel/beauty of the day. BUT it is a night-flyer! Its vernacular name in France is “La Runique”. The scientific name of the Merveille du Jour was, until recently, Dichonia aprilina. According to Emmet (1991), Dichonia is Greek for “a pairing” (there are two short parallel streaks in the tornal area of the hindwing). Latin aprilina does not refer to flight period (October) but to the month in which buds produce new bright green leaves. Now called Griposia aprilina. British macro-moths and butterflies all seem to have vernacular names. Almost everybody, whatever their level of expertise, appears happy to use them routinely. We have c. 1550 micro-moths (excluding adventives) and only 192 have a vernacular name in the checklist; these are mainly pests or relatively large and noticeable species. However, almost all other micros have a “Porter” vernacular, introduced by Jim Porter in 2002, many based on Heslop’s (1947) checklist. Although now listed on the NBN, Porter names have not caught on within the recording community. Indeed, they are vigorously derided. On Facebook, the ‘Description’ of the ‘Recording Moths Group’ includes: “Please avoid using abbreviations or initials for moth names, and Porter names for micros as not everyone will understand them.” In another Facebook Group, Porter names are called “artificial”, “manufactured” and “twee”. One County Moth Recorder said, “If someone sends in a record with London Dowd on it I will personally go round to their house, remove the collar from their Robinson, jam it over their head and then stick the bulb in their mouth. Then say ‘try trapping anything now‘.” London Dowd is Blastobasis lacticolella. In my Excel spreadsheet where I enter micros I include vernaculars, with Porter names in blue, but I cannot remember them. The YNU has a Conchological Section. We record slugs and snails. What do you think a Common Yellow Conch looks like? Perhaps? The YNU has a Conchological Section. We record slugs and snails. What do you think a Common Yellow Conch looks like? Arianta arbustorum var. Agapeta hamana (Common flavescens (Copse Snail) Yellow Conch) Paula Lightfoot told me about this record on iSpot, identified as: Scallop Shell (Rheumaptera undulata) It is, in fact: Whereas: King Scallop (Pecten Scallop Shell maximus) (Rheumaptera undulata) What about non-marine molluscs? For myself, I don’t use vernaculars, and I don’t know anybody who does. I wouldn’t recognise most of the names. If I need them, I try to follow the Kerney (1999) Atlas. In fact, for snails, NBN names are very similar. However, some species (e.g. Candidula gigaxii or Vitrea subrimata) do not yet have a vernacular. For slugs the situation is confused. In Rowson et al. (2014), the AIDGAP guide, there are 42 species. They give a “preferred” vernacular, and list alternatives. No. of names 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 No. of spp. 11* 7 7 5 8 3 1 *Mainly recently created species. One name is used for 3 spp., and 5 names are used for 2 spp. Preferred names agree about 90% with NBN. Quite how some vernacular names come about seems obscure to me. Why should Limax maximus, the Great Grey Slug, have become the Leopard Slug or Tiger Slug? Why should Arion flagellus, the Durham Slug, have become the Spanish Stealth Slug? SlugWatch, a citizen science project emanating from the John Innes Centre, seems to invent its own names (e.g. Chestnut Slug) and to engage in alarmist and sensational propaganda. Mollusc World seems happy to leave nomenclatural practice to individual authors. Fine, but I recently saw two different vernaculars for the same species in one issue. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Short-toothed Herald Snail Carychium minimum … [many spp., several pages] … Short-toothed Herald Snail … Carychium minimum Short-toothed Herald Snail … [many spp., several pages] … Carychium minimum … Short-toothed Herald Snail Carychium minimum … [many spp., several pages] … Short-toothed Herald Snail … .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Heathland 700 the Park & Poor's Allotment Species List
    The Park & Poor's Allotment Bioblitz 25th - 26th July 2015 Common Name Scientific Name [if known] Site recorded Fungus Xylaria polymorpha Dead Man's Fingers Both Amanita excelsa var. excelsa Grey Spotted Amanita Poor's Allotment Panaeolus sp. Poor's Allotment Phallus impudicus var. impudicus Stinkhorn The Park Mosses Sphagnum denticulatum Cow-horn Bog-moss Both Sphagnum fimbriatum Fringed Bog-moss The Park Sphagnum papillosum Papillose Bog-moss The Park Sphagnum squarrosum Spiky Bog-moss The Park Sphagnum palustre Blunt-leaved Bog-moss Poor's Allotment Atrichum undulatum Common Smoothcap Both Polytrichum commune Common Haircap The Park Polytrichum formosum Bank Haircap Both Polytrichum juniperinum Juniper Haircap The Park Tetraphis pellucida Pellucid Four-tooth Moss The Park Schistidium crassipilum Thickpoint Grimmia Poor's Allotment Fissidens taxifolius Common Pocket-moss The Park Ceratodon purpureus Redshank The Park Dicranoweisia cirrata Common Pincushion Both Dicranella heteromalla Silky Forklet-moss Both Dicranella varia Variable Forklet-moss The Park Dicranum scoparium Broom Fork-moss Both Campylopus flexuosus Rusty Swan-neck Moss Poor's Allotment Campylopus introflexus Heath Star Moss Both Campylopus pyriformis Dwarf Swan-neck Moss The Park Bryoerythrophyllum Red Beard-moss Poor's Allotment Barbula convoluta Lesser Bird's-claw Beard-moss The Park Didymodon fallax Fallacious Beard-moss The Park Didymodon insulanus Cylindric Beard-moss Poor's Allotment Zygodon conoideus Lesser Yoke-moss The Park Zygodon viridissimus Green Yoke-moss
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Different Mowing Regimes on Butterflies and Diurnal Moths on Road Verges A
    Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 29.2 (2006) 133 Effect of different mowing regimes on butterflies and diurnal moths on road verges A. Valtonen, K. Saarinen & J. Jantunen Valtonen, A., Saarinen, K. & Jantunen, J., 2006. Effect of different mowing regimes on butterflies and diurnal moths on road verges. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, 29.2: 133–148. Abstract Effect of different mowing regimes on butterflies and diurnal moths on road verges.— In northern and central Europe road verges offer alternative habitats for declining plant and invertebrate species of semi– natural grasslands. The quality of road verges as habitats depends on several factors, of which the mowing regime is one of the easiest to modify. In this study we compared the Lepidoptera communities on road verges that underwent three different mowing regimes regarding the timing and intensity of mowing; mowing in mid–summer, mowing in late summer, and partial mowing (a narrow strip next to the road). A total of 12,174 individuals and 107 species of Lepidoptera were recorded. The mid–summer mown verges had lower species richness and abundance of butterflies and lower species richness and diversity of diurnal moths compared to the late summer and partially mown verges. By delaying the annual mowing until late summer or promoting mosaic–like mowing regimes, such as partial mowing, the quality of road verges as habitats for butterflies and diurnal moths can be improved. Key words: Mowing management, Road verge, Butterfly, Diurnal moth, Alternative habitat, Mowing intensity. Resumen Efecto de los distintos regímenes de siega de los márgenes de las carreteras sobre las polillas diurnas y las mariposas.— En Europa central y septentrional los márgenes de las carreteras constituyen hábitats alternativos para especies de invertebrados y plantas de los prados semi–naturales cuyas poblaciones se están reduciendo.
    [Show full text]
  • Additions, Deletions and Corrections to An
    Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE IRISH BUTTERFLIES AND MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA) WITH A CONCISE CHECKLIST OF IRISH SPECIES AND ELACHISTA BIATOMELLA (STAINTON, 1848) NEW TO IRELAND K. G. M. Bond1 and J. P. O’Connor2 1Department of Zoology and Animal Ecology, School of BEES, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, Ireland. e-mail: <[email protected]> 2Emeritus Entomologist, National Museum of Ireland, Kildare Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. Abstract Additions, deletions and corrections are made to the Irish checklist of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera). Elachista biatomella (Stainton, 1848) is added to the Irish list. The total number of confirmed Irish species of Lepidoptera now stands at 1480. Key words: Lepidoptera, additions, deletions, corrections, Irish list, Elachista biatomella Introduction Bond, Nash and O’Connor (2006) provided a checklist of the Irish Lepidoptera. Since its publication, many new discoveries have been made and are reported here. In addition, several deletions have been made. A concise and updated checklist is provided. The following abbreviations are used in the text: BM(NH) – The Natural History Museum, London; NMINH – National Museum of Ireland, Natural History, Dublin. The total number of confirmed Irish species now stands at 1480, an addition of 68 since Bond et al. (2006). Taxonomic arrangement As a result of recent systematic research, it has been necessary to replace the arrangement familiar to British and Irish Lepidopterists by the Fauna Europaea [FE] system used by Karsholt 60 Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) and Razowski, which is widely used in continental Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Report Spring/Summer 2015 Contents
    Wimbledon and Putney Commons Monitoring Report Spring/Summer 2015 Contents CONTEXT 1 A. SYSTEMATIC RECORDING 3 METHODS 3 OUTCOMES 6 REFLECTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 18 B. BIOBLITZ 19 REFLECTIONS AND LESSONS LEARNT 21 C. REFERENCES 22 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Location of The Plain on Wimbledon and Putney Commons 2 Figure 2 Experimental Reptile Refuge near the Junction of Centre Path and Somerset Ride 5 Figure 3 Contrasting Cut and Uncut Areas in the Conservation Zone of The Plain, Spring 2015 6/7 Figure 4 Notable Plant Species Recorded on The Plain, Summer 2015 8 Figure 5 Meadow Brown and white Admiral Butterflies 14 Figure 6 Hairy Dragonfly and Willow Emerald Damselfly 14 Figure 7 The BioBlitz Route 15 Figure 8 Vestal and European Corn-borer moths 16 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Mowing Dates for the Conservation Area of The Plain 3 Table 2 Dates for General Observational Records of The Plain, 2015 10 Table 3 Birds of The Plain, Spring - Summer 2015 11 Table 4 Summary of Insect Recording in 2015 12/13 Table 5 Rare Beetles Living in the Vicinity of The Plain 15 LIST OF APPENDICES A1 The Wildlife and Conservation Forum and Volunteer Recorders 23 A2 Sward Height Data Spring 2015 24 A3 Floral Records for The Plain : Wimbledon and Putney Commons 2015 26 A4 The Plain Spring and Summer 2015 – John Weir’s General Reports 30 A5 a Birds on The Plain March to September 2015; 41 B Birds on The Plain - summary of frequencies 42 A6 ai Butterflies on The Plain (DW) 43 aii Butterfly long-term transect including The Plain (SR) 44 aiii New woodland butterfly transect
    [Show full text]
  • Database of Irish Lepidoptera. 1 - Macrohabitats, Microsites and Traits of Noctuidae and Butterflies
    Database of Irish Lepidoptera. 1 - Macrohabitats, microsites and traits of Noctuidae and butterflies Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 35 Database of Irish Lepidoptera. 1 - Macrohabitats, microsites and traits of Noctuidae and butterflies Ken G.M. Bond and Tom Gittings Department of Zoology, Ecology and Plant Science University College Cork Citation: Bond, K.G.M. and Gittings, T. (2008) Database of Irish Lepidoptera. 1 - Macrohabitats, microsites and traits of Noctuidae and butterflies. Irish Wildlife Manual s, No. 35. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland. Cover photo: Merveille du Jour ( Dichonia aprilina ) © Veronica French Irish Wildlife Manuals Series Editors: F. Marnell & N. Kingston © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2008 ISSN 1393 – 6670 Database of Irish Lepidoptera ____________________________ CONTENTS CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................................................1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................2 The concept of the database.....................................................................................................................2 The structure of the database...................................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Glynhir Review 2014
    Botanical Society of Britain & Ireland Registered Charity Number 212560 BSBI Vice-county Co-recorders for Carmarthenshire Richard and Kath Pryce, Trevethin, School Road, Pwll, LLANELLI, Carmarthenshire, SA15 4AL answerphone: 01554 775847 email: Pryce [email protected] 17th August 2014 BSBI Week at Glynhir, Friday 19th – Friday 26th July 2014 Thank you all for contributing to this year’s Glynhir meeting and producing another exceptional variety of new and updated records. Judging by the letters and emails of appreciation we have received you must have enjoyed the week. We greatly value your knowledge and expertise which you so generously share. This year the weather didn’t let us down except insofar as it was generally too hot for energetic recording which resulted in, perhaps, an over-emphasis on visiting cooler upland areas. We’ve now had a chance to make an initial analysis of the records produced during the week, although we await some cards. We’ve included a table showing the highlights at the end of this letter which also shows who visited where. A few of the best finds are highlighted below. The Saturday afternoon visit to Cwrtbrynybeirdd gave us the opportunity to examine a very diverse, base-rich, flushed pasture where Eriophorum latifolium and Eleocharis multicaulis were new tetrad records. Arthur Chater pointed out a number of rather, past-their- best, often half-grazed, small almost sickle-shaped leaves which are very likely to be Platanthera bifolia. We will obviously need to revisit the site next year at the time the plants should be in flower to make a re- examination.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterfly and Moth Recording Report 2011
    Lancashire, Manchester and Merseyside Butterfly and Moth Recording Report 2011 Laura Sivell Graham Jones Stephen Palmer 1 Butterfly Recording Laura Sivell County Butterfly Recorder Record Format More recorders who have computers chose to send their records by email. This is certainly preferred for ease of data input. The new version of Levana now has an excellent import facility, that can convert pages of records in a few seconds. MS Excel, MS Works, or tables in MS Word or tab-text are all acceptable file types. It not only makes my life much easier, it is a joy to use! Please remember to include your name in the file name of your records. On days where several different recorders send a file called ‘butterfly records 11’, it’s chaos! It also helps if you include a header with your name on so that your printed records can be easily attributed to you. Woefully few people have taken this on board. Thanks to those that have, it takes so little to bring joy and relief to this poor recorder. Any recorders with computers but not currently sending their records electronically, please consider doing so. Even if you don’t have email, records can be sent on disc. The following format is ideal Joe Bloggs 12/5/10 SD423456 Pilling Moss Orange Tip 3 all females, eggs also seen Joe Bloggs 12/5/10 SD423456 Pilling Moss Green-veined white 4 Sheila Bloggs 14/9/10 SD721596 Hasgill Fell Small heath 2 mating pair Joe Bloggs 11/10/10 SD5148 Grizedale Speckled Wood C please don’t put m or f for male or female, or anything else, in the numbers column as it makes the programme crash.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Makrolepidopterenfauna Der Salweide (Salix Caprea L.) in Waldmantelgesell- Schaften in Südniedersachsen (Lepidoptera)
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Nachrichten des Entomologischen Vereins Apollo Jahr/Year: 2003 Band/Volume: 24 Autor(en)/Author(s): Füldner Kai, Damm Matthias Artikel/Article: Die Makrolepidopterenfauna der Salweide (Salix caprea L.) in Waldmantelgesellschaften in Südniedersachsen (Lepidoptera) 65-73 64 Nachr. entomol. Ver. Apollo, N. F. 24 (1/2): 65–73 (2003) 65 Die Makrolepidopterenfauna der Salweide (Salix caprea L.) in Waldmantelgesell- schaften in Südniedersachsen (Lepidoptera) Kai Füldner und Matthias Damm Dr. Kai Füldner, Matthias Damm, Institut für Forstzoologie, Büsgenweg 3 , D-37077 Göttingen, Deutschland; E-Mail (K. Füldner): [email protected] Zusammenfassung: Bei Untersuchungen im südniedersäch- daran lebende Fauna zurückgedrängt. Diese Einstellung sischen Bergland und im Solling wurden von 1997 bis 2001 hat sich jedoch in den letzten Jahren gewandelt, es besteht an insgesamt 148 überwiegend jungen Salweiden (Salix vielerorts ein bewußtes Interesse der Forstbetriebe am caprea L.), die an verschieden exponierten Waldinnen- und -außenmantelgesellschaften aufwuchsen, im wöchentlichen Erhalt struktureller Vielfalt auch im Wirtschaftswald Rhythmus zur Vegetatonszeit alle Phytophage abgesammelt. (siehe zum Beispiel Otto 1994). Erhebliche Bedeutung Dabei konnten insgesamt 79 Makrolepidopterentaxa im Rau- erlangen hierbei Waldaußen- und -innenmantelgesell- penstadium festgestellt werden, deren Fundhäufigkeiten schaften.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Duty Report 2015-2017
    Biodiversity Duty Report 2015-2017 Preamble Under the Nature Conservation (Scotland) Act (2004), every public body in Scotland is required to further the conservation of biodiver- sity when carrying out its responsibilities. The Wildlife and Natural Environment (Scotland) Act (2011) further requires all Scottish pub- lic bodies to provide, every three years, a publicly available report on the actions they have taken to meet the Scottish Biodiversity Duty. Biodiversity is at the heart of the work of the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh (RBGE). Our web page (http://www.rbge.org.uk/), our annual reports and submissions to the Scottish Biodiversity Strate- gy, the Convention on Biological Diversity, and the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation are the primary source of details on our biodiversity science, conservation, horticulture, education and public engagement activities. This report provides an overview of these activities in the period 2015-2017. It also summarises the steps we have taken towards environmentally sustainable management for biodiversity on our own estates. Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh Biodiversity Report 2015-2017v1.0; Published 31st December 2017 Front cover : A selection of wildlife recorded at RBGE Edinburgh in 2015-2017. Top left Coot ( Fulica atra ). Upper middle left, fly Bibio lanigerus . Lower middle left, Kingfisher ( Alcedo atthis ). Bottom left, barkfly Graphopsocus cruciata . Top right, Merveil- le du Jour ( Griposia aprilina ) (Photo Lucy Cooke). Upper middle right, Spider Aranea diademata with wasp as prey. Lower mid- dle right, Peacock butterfly ( Inachis io ). Bottom right, head end of caterpillar of Elephant Hawk Moth ( Deilephila elpenor). Photos Robert Mill except where otherwise credited. Back cover Grey Heron ( Ardea cinerea ).Photo Robert Mill, RBGE Introduction The Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh (RBGE) is a world renowned scientific institution, a centre for plant science and education, and a public attraction.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Native and Non-Native Plants on Urban Insect Communities: Are Native Plants Better Than Non-Natives?
    Impacts of Native and Non-native plants on Urban Insect Communities: Are Native Plants Better than Non-natives? by Carl Scott Clem A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Auburn, Alabama December 12, 2015 Key Words: native plants, non-native plants, caterpillars, natural enemies, associational interactions, congeneric plants Copyright 2015 by Carl Scott Clem Approved by David Held, Chair, Associate Professor: Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology Charles Ray, Research Fellow: Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology Debbie Folkerts, Assistant Professor: Department of Biological Sciences Robert Boyd, Professor: Department of Biological Sciences Abstract With continued suburban expansion in the southeastern United States, it is increasingly important to understand urbanization and its impacts on sustainability and natural ecosystems. Expansion of suburbia is often coupled with replacement of native plants by alien ornamental plants such as crepe myrtle, Bradford pear, and Japanese maple. Two projects were conducted for this thesis. The purpose of the first project (Chapter 2) was to conduct an analysis of existing larval Lepidoptera and Symphyta hostplant records in the southeastern United States, comparing their species richness on common native and alien woody plants. We found that, in most cases, native plants support more species of eruciform larvae compared to aliens. Alien congener plant species (those in the same genus as native species) supported more species of larvae than alien, non-congeners. Most of the larvae that feed on alien plants are generalist species. However, most of the specialist species feeding on alien plants use congeners of native plants, providing evidence of a spillover, or false spillover, effect.
    [Show full text]
  • Bat Aggregational Response to Pest Caterpillar Emergence Ján Blažek*, Adam Konečný & Tomáš Bartonička
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Bat aggregational response to pest caterpillar emergence Ján Blažek*, Adam Konečný & Tomáš Bartonička Moths (Lepidoptera) are major agricultural and forest pests in many parts of the world, including Europe, with many causing great economic damage to crops, horticultural plants, stored items, and wool products. Here, we focus on two ecologically similar inchworms, Operophtera brumata and Erannis defoliaria, known for their high foliage consumption during the spring emergence of caterpillars. We hypothesise that bats could play a role in reducing pests such as caterpillars by switching to this abundant emerging prey. At two infested and one control forest sites, caterpillars were sampled during spring to determine levels of infestation. At the same time, bat fight activity was monitored during the peak in caterpillar abundance. During the spring caterpillar outbreak, we collected faecal samples of forest-dwelling bats capable of using gleaning. The majority of samples were positive for our focus species, being 51.85% for O. brumata and 29.63% for E. defoliaria faecal samples. The foraging activity of two gleaning bats, Myotis nattereri and Myotis bechsteinii, increased at both infested sites, but not at the control site, during caterpillar emergence, as did foraging of Plecotus auritus/austriacus, which used both gleaning and aerial hawking. We conclude that both specialists and occasional gleaners, which prefer diferent prey but are able to switch their foraging strategies, aggregate at sites during pest emergence and, as such, our results confrm the high potential of bats to reduce numbers of pest species such as caterpillars. A predator’s efect on prey populations is generally studied using numerical responses 1,2 driven by two mecha- nisms, migration of predators to sites with high prey concentrations (aggregational response) and predator reproduction, which results in a delayed increase in the density of predators3.
    [Show full text]
  • Naturalist 1092 Text + Centre Pages
    August 2016 Volume 141 Number 1092 Yorkshire Union Yorkshire Union The Naturalist Vol. 141 No. 1092 August 2016 Contents Page The shrinking violet Viola stagnina in the Thorne area of Yorkshire I. McDonald 81 The Bloody-nosed Beetle Timarcha tenebricosa in North Yorkshire: distribution 87 and estimates of population size* Geoff S. Oxford, Roma H. Oxford and Simon Warwick Note on ship-based sightings of Cetaceans off the Yorkshire coast John Perry 96 The genus Campsicnemus in Yorkshire Roy Crossley 99 More dots on the map: further records of leafmining moths in East Yorkshire 101 Andy D. Nunn and Barry Warrington Yorkshire Ichneumons: Part 5 W.A.Ely 104 Field Note: Vagrant Emperor in Hessle Barry Warrington 120 The phenomenon of urban peat formation* Graeme T. Swindles, Andrew 121 Jones and Garry Rushworth Woodlands of the Ormesby to Wilton areas, N.E. Yorkshire: some observations 127 on their terrestrial molluscs and flora* A.A. Wardhaugh Fundraising campaign to create new pollinator-friendly habitat in York Alice 134 Farr The formation and early years of organized natural history in Hebden Bridge, 137 Yorkshire, and the influence of William Nowell (1880 -1968) R. A. Baker John Frank Raw, naturalist, and his significance today Anthony Raw 144 YNU Membership Survey – results and next steps Paula Lightfoot, Andy Millard 150 and Barry Warrington YNU Calendar 2016 160 Notices: YNU Annual General Meeting p120 Scarborough Museum Exhibition p119 Opportunities at the Yorkshire Naturalists’ Union p159 An asterisk* indicates a peer-reviewed paper Front cover: Adult Bloody-nosed Beetle Timarcha tenebricosa (see pp87-95). Photo: Geoff Oxford Back cover: Volunteers and local residents planting wild flowers at Millennium Bridge, a flagship ‘buzzing site’ for York Urban Buzz (see pp134-136).
    [Show full text]