DOCSLIB.ORG

Estimation of Harp Seal (Pagophilus Groenlandicus) Pup Production in the North Atlantic Completed: Results from Surveys in the Greenland Sea in 2002

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Estimation of Harp Seal (Pagophilus Groenlandicus) Pup Production in the North Atlantic Completed: Results from Surveys in the Greenland Sea in 2002 ICES Journal of Marine Science, 63: 95e104 (2006) doi:10.1016/j.icesjms.2005.07.005 Estimation of harp seal (Pagophilus groenlandicus) pup production in the North Atlantic completed: results from surveys in the Greenland Sea in 2002 Tore Haug, Garry B. Stenson, Peter J. Corkeron, and Kjell T. Nilssen Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/icesjms/article/63/1/95/625803 by guest on 27 September 2021 Haug, T., Stenson, G. B., Corkeron, P. J., and Nilssen, K. T. 2006. Estimation of harp seal (Pagophilus groenlandicus) pup production in the North Atlantic completed: results from surveys in the Greenland Sea in 2002. e ICES Journal of Marine Science, 63: 95e104. From 14 March to 6 April 2002 aerial surveys were carried out in the Greenland Sea pack ice (referred to as the ‘‘West Ice’’), to assess the pup production of the Greenland Sea population of harp seals, Pagophilus groenlandicus. One fixed-wing twin-engined aircraft was used for reconnaissance flights and photographic strip transect surveys of the whelping patches once they had been located and identified. A helicopter assisted in the reconnaissance flights, and was used subsequently to fly visual strip transect surveys over the whelping patches. The helicopter was also used to collect data for estimating the distribution of births over time. Three harp seal breeding patches (A, B, and C) were located and surveyed either visually or photographically. Results from the staging flights suggest that the majority of harp seal females in the Greenland Sea whelped between 16 and 21 March. The calculated temporal distribution of births were used to correct the estimates obtained for Patch B. No correction was considered necessary for Patch A. No staging was performed in Patch C; the estimate obtained for this patch may, therefore, be slightly negatively biased. The total estimate of pup production, including the visual survey of Patch A, both visual and photographic surveys of Patch B, and photographic survey of Patch C, was 98 500 (s.e. Z 16 800), giving a coefficient of variation of 17.9% for the survey. Adding the obtained Greenland Sea pup production estimate to recent estimates obtained using similar methods in the Northwest Atlantic (in 1999) and in the Barents Sea/White Sea (in 2002), it appears that the entire North Atlantic harp seal pup production, as determined at the turn of the century, is at least 1.4 million animals per year. Ó 2005 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: abundance, aerial surveys, birth distribution, Greenland Sea, harp seal, pup production. Received 6 July 2004; accepted 23 July 2005. T. Haug, P. J. Corkeron, and K. T. Nilssen: Institute of Marine Research, PO Box 6404, N- 9294 Tromsø, Norway. Current address for P. J. Corkeron: Bioacoustics Research Program, Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, 159 Sapsucker Woods Road, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA. G. B. Stenson: Science Branch, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Centre, PO Box 5667, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada A1C 5X1. Correspondence to T. Haug: tel: C47 776 09722; fax: C47 776 09701; e-mail: [email protected]. Introduction examined using cranial measurements (Yablokov and Sergeant, 1963), underwater vocalizations (Perry and Three populations of harp seals, Pagophilus groenlandicus, Terhune, 1999), serum transferrins (Møller et al., 1966; inhabit the North Atlantic Ocean (Sergeant, 1991). Whelp- Nævdal, 1966, 1969, 1971), blood serum proteins (Borisov, ing occurs on the pack ice off eastern Newfoundland and in 1966), allozymes (Meisfjord and Nævdal, 1994), and DNA the Gulf of St. Lawrence (the Northwest Atlantic (Meisfjord and Sundt, 1996; Perry et al., 2000). These population), off the east coast of Greenland (the Greenland studies have revealed significant differences between the Sea or West Ice population), and in the White Sea (the Northwest Atlantic population on the one side and the Barents Sea/White Sea population). Relationships among Greenland Sea and Barents Sea harp seal populations on the three North Atlantic populations of harp seals have been the other, while no evidence of difference between the latter 1054-3139/$32.00 Ó 2005 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 96 T. Haug et al. two was observed. Recent observations from satellite tagging production should be conducted periodically, preferably experiments suggest that Greenland Sea and Barents Sea with 5 or less years between two consecutive surveys, and harp seals overlap in their feeding range during summer and that efforts should be made to ensure comparability of autumn (JuneeOctober) in the northern Barents Sea (Folkow survey results (ICES, 1994, 2004; NAFO, 1995). et al., 2004). Also, recaptures from tagging experiments, Recent estimates of harp seal pup production are available using traditional flipper tags, suggest that mixing of for the Northwest Atlantic (997 900, s.e. Z 102 100, obtained immature animals between the West Ice and Barents Sea in 1999; Stenson et al.,2003) and Barents Sea/White Sea populations may occur, but there is no evidence of mixing on (330 000, s.e. Z 34 000, obtained in 2002; ICES, 2004) pop- the breeding grounds (Øien and Øritsland, 1995). ulations. Subsequent assessments, done by fitting population Estimating abundance and monitoring changes in models to the independent estimates of pup production (e.g. population size is critical for the management of harp Healey and Stenson, 2000; ICES, 2001, 2004), suggest that Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/icesjms/article/63/1/95/625803 by guest on 27 September 2021 seals and to understand their role in the North Atlantic the total size of these two populations combined may now be ecosystem. Harp seals are the most abundant pinniped in approximately 7.5 million animals. There are no current the North Atlantic, where they are the focus of the largest estimates of harp seal pup production in the Greenland Sea. marine mammal harvest in the world. Although the three Greenland Sea harp seals were surveyed aerially in 1991, populations have historically been exploited and managed giving a combined estimate of 55 270 (CV 0.141) pups for separately, the combined total reported harvest (conducted four detected and surveyed patches (Øritsland and Øien, by Canada, Greenland, Norway, and Russia) in 2002 was 1995). Obtaining updated information on pup production is approximately 450 000 animals (ICES, 2004). Thus, there needed to assess the status of the Greenland Sea harp seal is considerable interest in assessing the status and population. Consequently, aerial surveys were carried out monitoring changes in abundance in all three populations in 2002 during their whelping (pupping) period (Marche in order to manage the respective harvests responsibly. In April). The surveys were carried out using techniques addition, knowledge of harp seal population size is one similar to those developed and used previously to determine factor required in order to estimate the potential influence pup production for harp seals in the Northwest Atlantic of this species on other marine organisms, including (Stenson et al., 1993, 2002, 2003), in the Greenland Sea commercially important fish species. Harp seals are (Øritsland and Øien, 1995), and in the White Sea (Potelov important predators, and may also play a role in et al., 2003; ICES, 2004). Standardization of methodology structuring ecosystems, both in the Northwest (Hammill and interpretation of results were achieved by involving and Stenson, 2000; Bundy, 2001) and Northeast (Nilssen scientists from Canadian, Norwegian, and Russian institu- et al., 2000) Atlantic. For example, in Atlantic Canada tions in both fieldwork and subsequent analyses of data. waters harp seals accounted for over 80% of the estimated Although there were some small differences between surveys, 4 million tonnes of fish and zooplankton consumed by all the results from all areas are comparable and facilitate an seal species in the area (Hammill and Stenson, 2000). updated ‘‘turn-of-the-century’’ estimate of the total pup Annual consumption by Barents Sea/White Sea harp seals production of harp seals in the entire North Atlantic based on was calculated by Nilssen et al. (2000) to be of sampling over a restricted time period (1999e2002). a magnitude of 3.5 million tonnes, of which various fish species constituted well over 2 million tonnes e an amount comparable with the quantities of fish consumed Material and methods annually by cod Gadus morhua, the main upper-level predator of the Barents Sea (Bogstad et al., 2000). Reconnaissance surveys Due to uncertainties in the assumptions required when Whelping concentrations were located using fixed-wing and estimating abundance from catch-at-age data and sequential helicopter reconnaissance surveys of areas historically used population models, total abundance of a population is by harp and hooded seals in the Greenland Sea, mainly the estimated by fitting a population model using age-specific pack ice areas along the eastern coast of Greenland between reproductive rates and catches to the independent estimates 67(30#N and 74(40#N(Figure 1). Surveys were carried out of pup production (e.g. ICES, 2004). Although mark- between 14 March and 5 April 2002 at altitudes between recapture techniques have been used previously (e.g. 800 and 1000 ft. Reconnaissance flights using the fixed- Bowen and Sergeant, 1983; Øien and Øritsland, 1995), wing aircraft were generally flown as repeated systematic the use of aerial photographic and visual surveys represents eastewest transects spaced 10 nm apart, from the ice edge an alternative and industry independent approach to in the east into the dense drift ice closer to the Greenland estimate harp seal pup production that has been used shore. Due to ice drift and variation in pupping dates (mid to successfully both in the Northwest Atlantic (Stenson et al., late March, see Øritsland and Øien, 1995), most areas were 1993, 2002, 2003), in the Greenland Sea (Øritsland and surveyed repeatedly to minimize the chance of missing Øien, 1995), and in the White Sea (Potelov et al., 2003; whelping concentrations.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Monk Seals in Post-Classical History
    Monk Seals in Post-Classical History The role of the Mediterranean monk seal (Monachus monachus) in European history and culture, from the fall of Rome to the 20th century William M. Johnson Mededelingen No. 39 2004 NEDERLANDSCHE COMMISSIE VOOR INTERNATIONALE NATUURBESCHERMING Mededelingen No. 39 i NEDERLANDSCHE COMMISSIE VOOR INTERNATIONALE NATUURBESCHERMING Netherlands Commission for International Nature Protection Secretariaat: Dr. H.P. Nooteboom National Herbarium of the Netherlands Rijksuniversiteit Leiden Einsteinweg 2 Postbus 9514, 2300 RA Leiden Mededelingen No. 39, 2004 Editor: Dr. H.P. Nooteboom PDF edition 2008: Matthias Schnellmann Copyright © 2004 by William M. Johnson ii MONK SEALS IN POST-CLASSICAL HISTORY The role of the Mediterranean monk seal (Monachus monachus) in European history and culture, from the fall of Rome to the 20th century by William M. Johnson Editor, The Monachus Guardian www.monachus-guardian.org email: [email protected] iii iv TABLE OF CONTENTS MONK SEALS IN POST-CLASSICAL HISTORY ......................................................III ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................................... VII ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................ VII MONK SEALS IN POST-CLASSICAL HISTORY ..............................................................................1 AN INTRODUCTION TO THE SPECIES ......................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Mammals of Hudson Strait the Following Marine Mammals Are Common to Hudson Strait, However, Other Species May Also Be Seen
    Marine Mammals of Hudson Strait The following marine mammals are common to Hudson Strait, however, other species may also be seen. It’s possible for marine mammals to venture outside of their common habitats and may be seen elsewhere. Bowhead Whale Length: 13-19 m Appearance: Stocky, with large head. Blue-black body with white markings on the chin, belly and just forward of the tail. No dorsal fin or ridge. Two blow holes, no teeth, has baleen. Behaviour: Blow is V-shaped and bushy, reaching 6 m in height. Often alone but sometimes in groups of 2-10. Habitat: Leads and cracks in pack ice during winter and in open water during summer. Status: Special concern Beluga Whale Length: 4-5 m Appearance: Adults are almost entirely white with a tough dorsal ridge and no dorsal fin. Young are grey. Behaviour: Blow is low and hardly visible. Not much of the body is visible out of the water. Found in small groups, but sometimes hundreds to thousands during annual migrations. Habitat: Found in open water year-round. Prefer shallow coastal water during summer and water near pack ice in winter. Killer Whale Status: Endangered Length: 8-9 m Appearance: Black body with white throat, belly and underside and white spot behind eye. Triangular dorsal fin in the middle of the back. Male dorsal fin can be up to 2 m in high. Behaviour: Blow is tall and column shaped; approximately 4 m in height. Narwhal Typically form groups of 2-25. Length: 4-5 m Habitat: Coastal water and open seas, often in water less than 200 m depth.
    [Show full text]
  • 56. Otariidae and Phocidae
    FAUNA of AUSTRALIA 56. OTARIIDAE AND PHOCIDAE JUDITH E. KING 1 Australian Sea-lion–Neophoca cinerea [G. Ross] Southern Elephant Seal–Mirounga leonina [G. Ross] Ross Seal, with pup–Ommatophoca rossii [J. Libke] Australian Sea-lion–Neophoca cinerea [G. Ross] Weddell Seal–Leptonychotes weddellii [P. Shaughnessy] New Zealand Fur-seal–Arctocephalus forsteri [G. Ross] Crab-eater Seal–Lobodon carcinophagus [P. Shaughnessy] 56. OTARIIDAE AND PHOCIDAE DEFINITION AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION Pinnipeds are aquatic carnivores. They differ from other mammals in their streamlined shape, reduction of pinnae and adaptation of both fore and hind feet to form flippers. In the skull, the orbits are enlarged, the lacrimal bones are absent or indistinct and there are never more than three upper and two lower incisors. The cheek teeth are nearly homodont and some conditions of the ear that are very distinctive (Repenning 1972). Both superfamilies of pinnipeds, Phocoidea and Otarioidea, are represented in Australian waters by a number of species (Table 56.1). The various superfamilies and families may be distinguished by important and/or easily observed characters (Table 56.2). King (1983b) provided more detailed lists and references. These and other differences between the above two groups are not regarded as being of great significance, especially as an undoubted fur seal (Australian Fur-seal Arctocephalus pusillus) is as big as some of the sea lions and has some characters of the skull, teeth and behaviour which are rather more like sea lions (Repenning, Peterson & Hubbs 1971; Warneke & Shaughnessy 1985). The Phocoidea includes the single Family Phocidae – the ‘true seals’, distinguished from the Otariidae by the absence of a pinna and by the position of the hind flippers (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • UPDATE MARINE MAMMALS Circumpolar Marine Mammal Expert Group, CBMP-Marine
    State of the Arctic Marine Biodiversity Report UPDATE MARINE MAMMALS Circumpolar Marine Mammal Expert Group, CBMP-Marine 2021 Polar bear with northern lights, Canada. Photo credit: Ondrej Prosicky/Shutterstock.com In 2017, the State of the Arctic Marine Biodiversity Report (SAMBR) synthesized data about biodiversity in Arctic marine ecosystems around the circumpolar Arctic. SAMBR highlighted observed changes The Circumpolar Biodiversity and relevant monitoring gaps. This document provides an update on Monitoring Program (CBMP) is the status of marine mammals in the circumpolar Arctic from 2015– an adaptive monitoring 2020 (scientific references for factual information and a more detailed program based on an version of the text herein can be found in Kovacs et al. 2021). international network of scientists, government Arctic endemic marine mammals are one focal group of the Circumpolar agencies, Indigenous Biodiversity Monitoring Program’s (CBMP) Arctic Marine Biodiversity organizations and conservation Monitoring Plan (CBMP-Marine Plan), along with sea ice biota, plankton, groups working together to benthos, marine fishes and seabirds. Networks of experts have harmonize and integrate efforts identified key elements, called Focal Ecosystem Components (FECs), to monitor the Arctic’s living within the Arctic marine ecosystem. Changes in the status of FECs resources. The CBMP organizes indicate changes in the broader marine environment. its efforts around the major This update was prepared by the Marine Mammals Expert Network, ecosystems of the Arctic: which works to coordinate monitoring and report scientific findings marine, freshwater, terrestrial regarding trends and their drivers in marine mammal populations and coastal. around the Arctic. In 2011, the CBMP Marine Expert Monitoring Group BACKGROUND published a circumpolar monitoring plan that describes Arctic endemic marine mammals live in close association with sea how Arctic states will compile, ice.
    [Show full text]
  • On Predatory Habits of Atlantic Walrus
    lULl.. ~~C'(fh"-<Y.~~\J Stlll~~JW&'VLt.:..l' Olf' PREDATORY HABITS OF ATLANTIC WALRUS c-n p~ ~~ ~ .J IU.K.Timoshenko (SevPINRO), L.A.Popov (VNIRO) n{)AltMti_ jIO.-~ W.JJ\.W'1 -~) WI Predators are known to exist among walruses. There is n~~o~~~O;> ~p tion in literature,however, on any direct observation on the attack I of walruses on other warm-blooded animals, except for the case repor- ted by Pedersen (Pedersen,I962). roo the data available are of particUlar interest. The observations were made on board vessels,helicopters and on ice in the White Sea in the sealing season of the harp seal. Here some examples will be given. ~ young walrus was encountered on the ice in the Nack of the White ~ea at a distance of 34 km west of the Village of Nizhnyaya Zolotitsa on March 4,1983. ~eeing pea.ple it crept down into water. The ice floe was stained with blood. Many traces found on the· snow covering the ice floe evidenced the predator's movements. Some fragments of a white-coat harp seal,e.g. head and fore flippers, were found. A similar caRe when a walrus attacked a harp seal was recorded in March 1976 (Popov,Nazarenko,I977). At that time the observation made on board a helicopter registered a fact that a young male at the age 3 or 4 years emerged from water and trod on a pup of harp seal who stayed on the ice floe without its mother, and disappeared with the pup in water.
    [Show full text]
  • Electrophoretic Variation in Large Mammals. III. the Ringed Seal, Pusa-Hispida, the Harp Seal, Pagophilus-Groenlandicus, and the Hooded Seal, Cystophora-Cristata
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Biological Sciences Faculty Publications Biological Sciences 1982 Electrophoretic Variation in Large Mammals. III. The Ringed Seal, Pusa-Hispida, the Harp Seal, Pagophilus-Groenlandicus, and the Hooded Seal, Cystophora-Cristata V. Simonsen Fred W. Allendorf University of Montana - Missoula, [email protected] W. F. Eanes F. O. Kapel Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/biosci_pubs Part of the Biology Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Simonsen, V.; Allendorf, Fred W.; Eanes, W. F.; and Kapel, F. O., "Electrophoretic Variation in Large Mammals. III. The Ringed Seal, Pusa-Hispida, the Harp Seal, Pagophilus-Groenlandicus, and the Hooded Seal, Cystophora-Cristata" (1982). Biological Sciences Faculty Publications. 63. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/biosci_pubs/63 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Biological Sciences at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biological Sciences Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Hereditas 97: 87-90 (1982) Electrophoretic variation in large mammals 111. The ringed seal, Pusa hispida, the harp seal, Pagophilus groenlandicus, and the hooded seal, Cystophora cristata. V. SIMONSEN', F. W. ALLENDORF, W. F. EANES3 and F. 0. KAPEL4 ' Institute of Ecology and Genetics, University of Aarhus, Denmark Department of Zoology, University of Montana, USA ' Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, Stony Brook, USA Greenland Fisheries Investigations, Charlottenlund, Denmark SIMONSEN, V., ALLENDORF, F. W.,EANES, W.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphometric Measurements and Body Condition of Healthy and Starveling Steller Sea Lion Pups (Eumetopias Jubatus)
    Aquatic Mammals 2000, 26.2, 151–157 Morphometric measurements and body condition of healthy and starveling Steller sea lion pups (Eumetopias jubatus) Andrew W. Trites1* and Remco A. H. Jonker1,2 1Marine Mammal Research Unit, Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, 2204 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4 2Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands Abstract Introduction The thickness and weight of skin, blubber, and There is considerable interest in applying simple body core were measured from 12 dead Steller sea methods to assess the general health of individual lion pups (Eumetopias jubatus). These necropsied marine mammals. In the case of pinnipeds, there are pups represented a wide range of body sizes and generally two approaches. The first measures the conditions (small to large, and fat to no-fat), and thickness of the blubber layer or the amount of were chosen to compare the relative body con- body fat, and is premised on the idea that a fat ditions of healthy and starved pups. Seven of the animal is healthy (e.g., Gales & Burton, 1987; Ryg pups lacked blubber and were significantly lighter et al., 1990a; Castellini et al., 1993, Renouf et al., for a given length compared to the five that had 1993; Gales et al., 1994; Arnould, 1995; Jonker & fat at their time of death. Volume exceeded mass Trites, unpublished data). The second approach by a factor of 1.3% with density averaging uses a standardized growth curve to determine how 0.987 g cm"3. Skin and blubber were not uniformly heavy an individual should be, based on its thick over the body surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Remarks on Eskimo Sealing and the Harp Seal Controversy
    SHORT PAPERS,NOTES, AND INSTITUTE NEWS 267 Remarks on Eskimo Sealing and usually much less than that earned from terrestrial animals such as the fox, land otter, and the Harp Seal Controversy muskrat, wolf, wolverine, or polar bear. Beginning in about 1962, advanced tech- Mostinhabitants of the North today are niquesin the preparation of hair-seal pelts employed full time or part time in the har- and the increased use of sealskins in cloth- vesting of biological resources. Until World ing, especially in Europe, combined to create War 11, earnings fromthe production of a rapidlyexpanding market for skins from renewable resourcesin nearly every major all seal species. For the first time, the ringed region of the circumpolar North exceeded seal, or jar, of the far north reached market incomes from nonrenewable-resource based values which made Eskimoseal hunting industries. In general,the most important highly lucrative. For example,in eastern producers have been the commercial fisheries BaRn Island,young ringed sealssold for of subarctic waters, followed by furs of wild $4.00 per skin in 1955 and $17.50 in 1963. and domesticated land mammals, again pre- Mature ringed seals increased in value from dominately from subarcticareas. Since the $1.50 to $12.25 during the same period. Ex- heyday of European and American northern ceptionally good skins often sold for well hunting in the eighteenth and nineteenth cen- over $20.00 in Alaska andCanada during turies, however, the economic importance of 1963 and 1964. Average sealskin prices in marine mammals has often been highly un- Greenland, carefully controlled by the gov- derrated.
    [Show full text]
  • Navigating the Monk Seal Maze
    Vol. 1 / No. 2 Published by IMMA Inc. December 1998 Editorial: Navigating the Monk Seal Maze – A Guide for the Layperson Bowing to popular demand, The Monachus Guardian presents yet another satirical view of monk seal conservation. This time, we travel to Northern Greece for a United Nations Environment Programme conference in the Byzantine city of Arta… International News Regional News Cover Story: Midway’s Monk Seals Editorial: Navigating the Monk Seal Maze When attempts were made to forcibly reintroduce Hawaiian monk seals to a former breeding site at Midway Atoll, all 18 translocated animals either died or disappeared in short order. More recently, a drastic reduction in human disturbance, coinciding with the closure of Midway’s Naval Base, has encouraged monk seals to recolonise the atoll of their own accord. But with ecotourism now developing on Midway, will this success story prove short-lived? In Focus: New Discoveries in Cilicia Researchers discover a hitherto unknown population of Mediterranean Monk Seals along Turkey’s Mediterranean Coast… Perspectives: The Life & Times of Q39 A diary of events surrounding the persecution of a yearling Hawaiian monk seal on Maui… Monachus Science: Antolovic, J. Mediterranean monk seal (Monachus monachus) habitat in Vis Archipelago, the Adriatic Midway’s Monk Seals Sea. Lavigne, D.M. Historical biogeography and phylogenetic relationships among modern monk seals, Monachus spp. Neves, H.C. & R. Pires. The recuperation of a monk seal pup, Monachus monachus, in the Ilhas Desertas – the conditions for its success. Letters to the Editor Recent Publications Conservation on the Desertas Islands Publishing Info Copyright © 1998 The Monachus Guardian.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of Harp and Hooded Seals in the North Atlantic Garry B
    NOT TO BE CITED WITHOUT PRIOR REFERENCE TO THE AUTHOR(S) Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization Serial No. N6321 NAFO SCR Doc. 14/026 SCIENTIFIC COUNCIL MEETING – JUNE 2014 The Status of Harp and Hooded Seals in the North Atlantic Garry B. Stenson Dept of Fisheries and Oceans Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Centre St. John’s, NL, Canada The Joint NAFO/ICES Working Group on Harp and Hooded Seals (WGHARP) The Joint ICES/NAFO Working Group on Harp and Hooded Seals (WGHARP) met during 26-30 August 2013 at the Knipovich Polar Research Institute of Marine Fisheries and Oceanography (PINRO, Murmansk, Russia. In attendance were 15 scientists representing Canada, Greenland, Norway, and Russia. In September 2012 the Norwegian Royal Ministry of Fisheries and Coastal Affairs requested ICES to assess the status of the Greenland Sea and White Sea/Barents Sea harp and hooded seal stocks. Their key request was for the WG to: a ) Review results of 2012–2013 surveys b ) Provide quota advice to ICES/NAFO member states of their harvests of harp and hooded seals as follows (request from Norway): - an assessment of status and harvest potential of the harp seal stocks in the Greenland Sea and the White Sea/ Barents Sea, and of the hooded seal stock in the Greenland Sea. - assess the impact on the harp seal stocks in the Greenland Sea and the White Sea/ Barents Sea of an annual harvest of: current harvest levels, sustainable catches(defined as the fixed annual catches that stabilizes the future 1 + population), catches that would reduce the population over a 10-years period in such a manner that it would remain above a level of 70% of current level with 80% probability.
    [Show full text]
  • Harp Seals in the Greenland Sea Was Set at 26 000 1+ Animals (Where 2 Pups Balance One 1+ Animal), I.E
    Appendix 8 The 48th Session of the Joint Norwegian - Russian Fisheries Commission, Ålesund, Norway, 15-18 October 2018 REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON SEALS Participants: RUSSIA V. B. ZABAVNIKOV PINRO, Murmansk NORWAY T. HAUG Institute of Marine Research, Tromsø I.A. ERIKSEN Sami Parliament, Karasjok J.E. JOHNSEN Norwegian Fisherman’s Association, Trondheim Contents: 1 Exchange of information and summary of seal catches in 2018. 2. Exchange of information and summary reports of research activities in 2018. 3. The status of stocks and management advice for 2019. 4. Research program for 2019+. 5. Other issues 6. Adoption of report 1. EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION AND SUMMARY OF SEAL CATCHES IN 2018 Norwegian catches in the Greenland Sea (West Ice) in 2018 was taken by 1 vessel, whereas no Russian seal vessels participated in the area. Due to the uncertain status for Greenland Sea hooded seals, no animals of the species were permitted taken in the ordinary hunt operations in 2018. Only 14 animals (whereof 6 were pups) were taken for scientific purposes. In addition, 3 pups were taken in the ordinary hunt, presumably because they were misidentified (as harp seal beaters) before they were shot. The 2018 TAC for harp seals in the Greenland Sea was set at 26 000 1+ animals (where 2 pups balance one 1+ animal), i.e. the removal level that would reduce the population with 30% over the next 15 year’s period. Total catches in 2018 were 2,703 (including 1,218 pups) harp seals, representing only 5% of the identified sustainable level. A possible reduction in harp seal pup production in the White Sea may have prevailed after 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Seals in Greenland
    Seals in Greenland - - An important component of culture - and economy - - The Last Ice Area Project December 2013 Report Seals in Greenland: - An important component of culture and economy. The Last Ice Area Project. Published by WWF Verdensnaturfonden, Svanevej 12, 2400 København NV. Telefon: +45 35 36 36 35 – E-mail: [email protected] Project This report is part of the WWF project the Last Ice Area. Front page photo Ringed seal on sea ice, Scoresbysund//Ittoqqortoormiit, East Greenland. © Carsten Egevang / ARC-PIC.COM. The Author Eva Garde is a biologist. She has a PhD in narwhal population biology from the University of Copenhagen, Denmark, and the Greenland Institute of Natural Resources, Greenland. Comments to the report from: KNAPK has commented on the report. The Greenland Institute of Natural Resources has commented on the first chapter ‘The Greenlandic seals’. This report can be downloaded from: WWF: www.wwf.dk/arktis Table of Content The Last Ice Area ........................................................................................................................... 2 Ilisarititsineq .................................................................................................................................. 3 Last Ice Area/Den Sidste Is ............................................................................................................ 4 Foreword ....................................................................................................................................... 6 English abstract ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]