Critical Issues in Managing Protected Areas by Multi-Stakeholder Participation – Analysis of a Process in the Swiss Alps

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Critical Issues in Managing Protected Areas by Multi-Stakeholder Participation – Analysis of a Process in the Swiss Alps Research eco.mont - Volume 1, Number 1, June 2009 ISSN 2073-106X print version 45 ISSN 2073-1558 online version: http://epub.oeaw.ac.at/eco.mont Critical Issues in Managing Protected Areas by Multi-Stakeholder Participation – Analysis of a Process in the Swiss Alps Astrid Wallner & Urs Wiesmann Keywords: protected areas, participation, integrated management, Switzerland, World Heritage Site Abstract Profile There is common agreement in discourses on nature protection that it can only Protected area succeed if local participation in conservation measures is granted. In the region of the UNESCO World Heritage Site Swiss Alps Jungfrau-Aletsch a multi-stakeholder UNESCO World Heritage Site participatory process was initiated to negotiate concrete objectives for the World Heritage Site Jungfrau-Aletsch. In this way persistent conflicting expectations should Swiss Alps Jungfrau-Aletsch be overcome and ownership and common responsibility for the region enhanced. In this paper we critically reflect this multi-stakeholder participatory process and Mountain range evaluate three core issues, which we regard as decisive in participatory processes: conflict resolution, power play, and continued participation. We conclude that Alps participatory processes support mutual learning, but at the same time inherent multi- level power play can threaten continued participation. Country Switzerland Introduction In its operational guidelines for the implementation of the World Heritage Convention, the UNESCO World Heritage Committee requires a management plan for each property inscribed in the World Heritage List (http://whc.unesco.org/archive/opguide08-en. pdf). In the case of the World Heritage Site Swiss Alps Jungfrau-Aletsch (WHS) – nominated by the World Heritage Committee in 2001 – a unique process was launched to negotiate concrete objectives, measures and activities for the WHS, which was to form the ba- sis for developing the management plan: a multi-stake- | downloaded: 16.5.2016 holder participatory process in the region. There were two reasons for choosing this approach: First, there is common agreement in the discourses on conservation that it can only succeed if local participation in na- ture protection measures is granted (Pimbert & Pretty 1997), and second, very diverse and in many cases con- View from the Aletschwald towards the Great Aletsch Glacier © Astrid Wallner flicting expectations of a WHS existed in this region. These different expectations were discovered by eva- be given to cultural landscapes, and another group of luating opinions expressed in the local press between stakeholders expected immediate economic gains. The 1997 and 2003 – which covered the period before and management centre of the WHS Jungfrau-Aletsch after the nomination of the WHS Jungfrau-Aletsch. initiated a multi-stakeholder participatory process to Prior to the nomination in 2001 a formal democratic negotiate concrete objectives, measures and activities decision-making process had taken place at the level for the WHS in the hope to overcome the persistent of the communes involved. Each commune had voted conflicting expectations and to enhance ownership on the idea of a WHS in the region, and the results and common responsibility for the region. These are had shown a high level of acceptance. However, this two aspects which are seen as crucial for increasing https://doi.org/10.7892/boris.36576 acceptance was based on diverse expectations and not understanding and lowering conflicts in relation to on common goals and strategies for implementation protected areas (Mannigel 2008). But even though and management (Wiesmann et al. 2005; Liechti et there is general agreement that public participation is al. 2008). Some parties expected increased conserva- an important principle and goal for achieving ecologi- source: tion efforts, others expected increased attention to cally sustainable and socially just environmental go- Research 46 vernance (Sneddon & Fox 2007), participation is an The World Heritage Site Swiss Alps Jungfrau-Aletsch exceedingly difficult objective to define and implement encompasses a high-alpine landscape and consists (Cooke & Kothari 2001). ‘Participation’ can be under- mainly of rock, ice and unproductive vegetation. This stood in many different ways. The approach chosen in perimeter is surrounded by an area of settlements and the case of the WHS Jungfrau-Aletsch corresponds small-scale cultural landscapes. Altogether this region to what Pimbert and Pretty (1997) have described as makes up world renown tourist attraction and serves ‘interactive participation’ and which can be interpreted as an important economic basis for the local residents as ‘empowerment’ (Pimbert & Pretty 1997; Berghöfer (35 000 people live in the communes of the region of & Berghöfer 2008). However, a participatory process the WHS Jungfrau-Aletsch). It is the declared inten- in the sense of interactive participation does not au- tion of the involved communes to preserve the whole tomatically imply that just because the actors are fully region made up by the 26 communes in all its diversity engaged there won’t be any tricky moments in these for future generations and to promote its sustainable processes. As Berghöfer and Berghöfer (2008) put it: development as an economic, living, recreational, and ‘If participation is to mean more than a mainstream natural space (Jungfrau-Aletsch-Bietschhorn Associa- acclaim, its different levels and objectives have to be tion 2005/2007). This means that there are ongoing made explicit.’ This request leads to the question of efforts in the region to combine protection and eco- limitations and risks of participatory processes. We nomic use, which poses one of the greatest challenges tackle this issue in this paper by critically reflecting the for the management. multi-stakeholder participatory process of the WHS The multi-stakeholder participatory process aimed at Jungfrau-Aletsch from a scientific perspective and negotiating concrete objectives, measures and actions evaluating core issues of this process. This reflection was divided into several phases (Figure 2). Some par- of the process is based on the insights of the process ticipants were selected after a preparatory workshop we gained in our role as researchers in an interdiscipli- in the region, others joined as a result of several an- nary research project which accompanied the multi- nouncements in the media or after face-to-face com- stakeholder participatory process (see Wiesmann et munication. 256 participants representing various al. 2005; Wallner et al. 2008). The methods used in stakeholder groups (i.e. groups from agriculture, tour- this project included semi-structured interviews with ism, trade, public administration, conservation, edu- participants of the participatory process, standardized cation, transport) were separated into two thematic questionnaires filled in by the participants, observation groups: one group dealt with questions of agriculture, during the discussions, as well as an analysis of news- forestry, tourism and trade, while the other group dealt paper articles published in the run-up to the designa- with questions of education, sensitization, natural and tion of the region as a World Heritage Site. cultural values. In each canton these two groups working on topics Defining a vision for the World Heritage met at the same time. In total, three rounds took place Site Jungfrau-Aletsch (Forum A – C) with a core group taking intermediate steps between the rounds. The central purpose of this process was to develop a The process resulted in a total of 69 objectives and common vision with the aim of assuming responsibi- 226 related measures being formulated in relation to lity for sustainable regional development. Developing issues of protection and economic development in the a common vision was particularly important as the region of the WHS Jungfrau-Aletsch. These objectives WHS Jungfrau-Aletsch is situated in a region charac- and measures were prioritized by the participants and terized by a high level of complexity. What we call the grouped into 21 project lines – 7 on issues of conser- Jungfrau-Aletsch World Heritage Region is neither a vation, 7 on development efforts, and 7 on manage- political, nor an economic, administrative, social or cul- ment and sensitization (Jungfrau-Aletsch-Bietschhorn tural unit. In administrative terms this region stretches Association 2005/2007). For each of these project across two cantons and covers part of the territory of lines, a so-called core group, consisting of participants 26 communes (Figure 1). Furthermore there are five of the process and newly recruited people interested regional planning associations that play an important in working on the future of their own region, devel- part in planning the region’s development strategies. oped concrete projects and recommended them to These associations aim to bridge the institutional gap the Jungfrau-Aletsch World Heritage Association for between the local and cantonal levels and serve as a implementation. Such projects included an upgrading platform where largely sectorally organized entities of of important regions to achieve a significant improve- public administration and representatives of civil soci- ment in the quality of habitat for flora and fauna; ety can coordinate actions in a more inclusive and trans- marketing possibilities for local agricultural products; sectoral manner (Hammer 2007). Given this complex enhancing local people’s and visitors’
Recommended publications
  • AIGUILLES and DOLOMITES. by E. Thomas
    268 Aiguilles and Dolomites . • AIGUILLES AND DoLOMITES. BY EUSTACE THOMAS. (Read before the Alpine Club, April 4, 1933.) T is four years since an article of mine entitled '· Six Years and the Four Thousanders,' an extension of a list furnished by Captain Farrar, appeared in the ALPINE JOURNAL ; 1 this gave a catalogue of Alpine peaks of a height of 4000 metres or over. My friends take a rather malicious delight in suggesting minor points and perhaps gendarmes on ridges to be added, and it is rather difficult to decide what ought or ought not to be included. Since that date, however, a list has appeared .in La JYlontagne under the signature of our member, Jean Chaubert; and with this I am in agreement. The principal addition was that of the Aiguilles du Diable, which I announced my intention of adding to the bag in my former paper. · In 1929 and 1930 the .Aiguilles du Diable were the principal objects of my desires, but were not in a fit state during my stay in the Alps those years. In 1930 I actually vvent to Chamonix from England for a second time in September ; but the weather changed for the wor$e on my arrival. All other points of Chaubert's list were gathered in however and, where there was any doubt, mountains were revisited. The original list was altered as follows .: Gran Paradiso, two points ; Massif of Mont Blanc two points on the Dome du Gouter were added, Pointe Bayeux and Poi1~te Bravais ; (:}ran des J orasses . Pointe Young was added; Grand Combin completely traversed to include five summits ; Breithorn completely traversed to include five summits; Jungfrau Group Wengern Jungfrau added.
    [Show full text]
  • Hike the Swiss Alps 23Nd Annual | September 11-22, 2016
    HIKE THE SWISS ALPS 23ND ANNUAL | SEPTEMBER 11-22, 2016 Guided by Virginia Van Der Veer & Terry De Wald Experience the Swiss Alps the best way of all – on foot with a small, congenial group of friends! Sponsored by Internationally-known Tanque Verde Ranch. Hiking Director, Virginia Van der Veer, and Terry DeWald, experienced mountaineer, lead the group limited to 15 guests. Having lived in Europe for many years, Virginia has in-depth knowledge of the customs of the people and places visited. She has experience guiding Alpine hiking tours and is fluent in German. Terry has mountaineering experience in the Alps and has guided hikers in Switzerland. INCLUDED IN PACKAGE… • Guided intermediate level day-hikes in spectacular scenery. • Opportunities for easy walks or more advanced hiking daily. • 5 nights hotel in Kandersteg, an alpine village paradise. • 1 day trip to Zermatt with views of the Matterhorn. • 5 nights hotel in Wengen with views of the Eiger and Jungfrau. • 2 nights in 4-star Swissotel, Zurich. • Hearty breakfast buffets daily. • 3 or 4-course dinners daily. • Swiss Rail Pass, allowing unlimited travel on Swiss railroads, lake streamers, PTT buses and city transports. • Day-trip to world-famous Zermatt at the foot of the Matterhorn. Opportunity for day-hike with views of the world’s most photographed mountain. • Visit to Lucerne. TOUR PRICING… Tour price $4,595(single supplement is $325 if required) Tour begins and ends in Zurich. A deposit of $800 is due at booking. Full payment is due at the Ranch by July 15. Early booking is advised due to small group size.
    [Show full text]
  • Berner Oberland 4 X 4000 Mit Finsteraarhorn
    Berner Oberland 4 x 4000 mit Finsteraarhorn Oberland Traversierung mit Mönch, Jungfrau und Finsteraarhorn Der Grosse Aletschgletscher mit dem Jungfraufirn ist der mächtigste Gletscher der Alpen. Das Eis ist am Konkordiaplatz noch gut 800 Meter dick! Der Blick schweift über weite Gletscherflächen und Sie bewegen sich in einer Atmosphäre arktischer Strenge. Der ebene und breite Gletscherstrom ist umgeben von den höchsten Gipfeln des Berner Oberlandes, die weit in den blauen Sommerhimmel ragen. Sie wandern auf einem schier endlos scheinenden Glet- scherstrom, der eine wohltuende Ruhe ausstrahlt, von Hütte zu Hütte. Viermal haben Sie dabei die Möglichkeit auf über 4000 Meter hohe Berge zu klettern und dort oben den Alltag weit hinter sich zu lassen. Von Grindelwald aus besteigen Sie zu Beginn der Reise die bekanntesten Gletscherberge des Gebie- tes – den Mönch (4099 m) und die Jungfrau (4158 m). Im Zentrum der Gletscherströme liegt die Kon- kordiahütte (2850 m) beeindruckend über dem Grossen Aletschgletscher. Von hier klettern Sie über steile Firnflanken und wunderbaren Fels auf das versteckte Gross Grünhorn (4043 m). In Schleifen führt der Weg weiter über den spaltenreichen Fieschergletscher, bevor Sie die Sonnen- terasse der neuen Finsteraarhornhütte (3048 m) erwartet. Die Hütte ist noch fast neu und bietet ange- nehmen Komfort. Freuen Sie sich dann am nächsten Morgen auf die wunderbaren Kletterpassagen im griffigen Fels des Finsteraarhorns (4273 m), dem höchsten Berner Oberländer. Nach Rückkehr von der Tour werden Sie auf der Sonnenterrasse liegend, noch lange in Gedanken dort oben sein… Zur Abrundung Ihrer Reise in diese monumentale Landschaft der Gletscher und Himmelsberge, erwar- tet Sie ein langer, intensiver Rückweg in die Zivilisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Managementstrategie Für Das UNESCO Weltnaturerbe Jungfrau-Aletsch-Bietschhorn
    Managementstrategie für das UNESCO Weltnaturerbe Jungfrau-Aletsch-Bietschhorn Trägerschaft UNESCO Weltnaturerbe Jungfrau-Aletsch-Bietschhorn Naters und Interlaken, 1. Dezember 2005 07_Managementstrategie_D_Titelse1 1 15.1.2008 11:11:27 Uhr Zitierung Trägerschaft UNESCO Weltnaturerbe Jungfrau-Aletsch-Bietschhorn, 2005: Managementplan für das UNESCO Weltnaturerbe Jungfrau-Aletsch-Bietschhorn; Naters und Interlaken, Schweiz: Trägerschaft UNESCO Weltnaturerbe Jungfrau-Aletsch-Bietschhorn. Autoren Wiesmann, Urs; Wallner, Astrid; Liechti, Karina; Aerni, Isabel: CDE (Centre for Development and Environment), Geographisches Institut, Universität Bern Schüpbach, Ursula; Ruppen, Beat: Managementzentrum UNESCO Weltnaturerbe Jungfrau-Aletsch-Bietschhorn, Naters und Interlaken Kartenredaktion Hiller, Rebecca und Berger, Catherine; CDE (Centre for Development and Environment), Geographisches Institut, Universität Bern in Zusammenarbeit mit der Trägerschaft UNESCO Weltnaturerbe Jungfrau-Aletsch-Bietschhorn, Naters und Interlaken Kontaktadressen Trägerschaft und Managementzentrum UNESCO Weltnaturerbe Jungfrau-Aletsch-Bietschhorn Postfach 444 CH-3904 Naters und Jungfraustrasse 38 CH-3800 Interlaken [email protected]; www.welterbe.ch © Trägerschaft UNESCO Weltnaturerbe Jungfrau-Aletsch-Bietschhorn, Naters, Schweiz Alle Rechte vorbehalten Titelfotos Trägerschaft UNESCO Weltnaturerbe Jungfrau-Aletsch-Bietschhorn (2005) Albrecht (1999); Ehrenbold (2001); Andenmatten (1995); Jungfraubahnen Kein Gebilde der Natur, das ich jemals sah, ist vergleichbar mit der
    [Show full text]
  • 13 Protection: a Means for Sustainable Development? The
    13 Protection: A Means for Sustainable Development? The Case of the Jungfrau- Aletsch-Bietschhorn World Heritage Site in Switzerland Astrid Wallner1, Stephan Rist2, Karina Liechti3, Urs Wiesmann4 Abstract The Jungfrau-Aletsch-Bietschhorn World Heritage Site (WHS) comprises main- ly natural high-mountain landscapes. The High Alps and impressive natu- ral landscapes are not the only feature making the region so attractive; its uniqueness also lies in the adjoining landscapes shaped by centuries of tra- ditional agricultural use. Given the dramatic changes in the agricultural sec- tor, the risk faced by cultural landscapes in the World Heritage Region is pos- sibly greater than that faced by the natural landscape inside the perimeter of the WHS. Inclusion on the World Heritage List was therefore an opportunity to contribute not only to the preservation of the ‘natural’ WHS: the protected part of the natural landscape is understood as the centrepiece of a strategy | downloaded: 1.10.2021 to enhance sustainable development in the entire region, including cultural landscapes. Maintaining the right balance between preservation of the WHS and promotion of sustainable regional development constitutes a key chal- lenge for management of the WHS. Local actors were heavily involved in the planning process in which the goals and objectives of the WHS were defined. This participatory process allowed examination of ongoing prob- lems and current opportunities, even though present ecological standards were a ‘non-negotiable’ feature. Therefore the basic patterns of valuation of the landscape by the different actors could not be modified. Nevertheless, the process made it possible to jointly define the present situation and thus create a basis for legitimising future action.
    [Show full text]
  • Aletsch 5 4 7 8 10 99 14 15 16 17 3  2 6
    Luftbilder der Schweiz UNESCO Weltnaturerbe Jungfrau - Aletsch 5 4 7 8 10 99 14 15 16 17 3 2 6 18 13 1 12 11 © Schweizer© Schweizer Luftwaffe, Luftwaffe 2010 1 Bildkoordinaten 647'570/143'290 2 Olmenhorn (3314 m) 3 kleines Dreieckshorn (3639 m) 4 Geisshorn (3740 m) 5 Aletschhorn (4193 m) 6 Mittelaletschbiwak SAC (3013 m) 7 Jungfrau (4158 m) 8 Mönch (4107 m) 9 Eiger (3970 m) 10 Trugberg (3933 m) 11 Station Bettmergrat (2647 m) 12 Bettmergrat 13 Märjelensee 14 Chamm (3866 m) 15 Fiescher Gabelhorn (3876 m) 16 Schönbühlhorn (3854 m) 17 Grosses Wannenhorn (3905 m) 18 Grosser Aletschgletscher In historischer Aufnahme aus dem Jahr 1921 © Schweizer Luftwaffe, 12. Juli 1921 © PHBern © Schweizer Luftwaffe Aletschgletscher Seite 1 Luftbilder der Schweiz Das UNESCO Weltnaturerbe Jungfrau - Aletsch Abbildung entnommen aus: «Welt der Alpen - Erbe der Welt», Haupt Verlag Bern, 2007 © PHBern © Schweizer Luftwaffe Aletschgletscher Seite 2 Luftbilder der Schweiz ungefähre Aufnahmerichtung des Luftbildes 11 Schweiz. Landeskarte 1 : 100'000, Blatt 42, Oberwallis © 2011 swisstopo (BA110304) Aufnahme in die Welterbeliste Für die Aufnahme als Welterbe in die Welterbeliste gelten für Naturgüter gemäss den «Operational Guidlines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention» vier Kriterien, wovon mindestens eines erfüllt sein muss. Gemäss IUCN (The World Conversation Union) erfüllt das Gebiet Schweizer Alpen Jungfrau- Aletsch drei der vier Kriterien wie folgt (Küttel, 1998, IUCN, 2001): Kriterium (i): Das Gebiet Schweizer Alpen Jungfrau-Aletsch ist ein eindrückliches Beispiel der alpinen Gebirgsbildung und der damit verbundenen vielfältigen geologischen und geomorphologischen Formen. Das am dichtesten vergletscherte Gebiet der Alpen enthält mit dem Grossen Aletschgletscher den grössten Gletscher im westlichen Alpenraum.
    [Show full text]
  • Glacier Fluctuations During the Past 2000 Years
    Quaternary Science Reviews 149 (2016) 61e90 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quascirev Invited review Glacier fluctuations during the past 2000 years * Olga N. Solomina a, , Raymond S. Bradley b, Vincent Jomelli c, Aslaug Geirsdottir d, Darrell S. Kaufman e, Johannes Koch f, Nicholas P. McKay e, Mariano Masiokas g, Gifford Miller h, Atle Nesje i, j, Kurt Nicolussi k, Lewis A. Owen l, Aaron E. Putnam m, n, Heinz Wanner o, Gregory Wiles p, Bao Yang q a Institute of Geography RAS, Staromonetny-29, 119017 Staromonetny, Moscow, Russia b Department of Geosciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA c Universite Paris 1 Pantheon-Sorbonne, CNRS Laboratoire de Geographie Physique, 92195 Meudon, France d Department of Earth Sciences, University of Iceland, Askja, Sturlugata 7, 101 Reykjavík, Iceland e School of Earth Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA f Department of Geography, Brandon University, Brandon, MB R7A 6A9, Canada g Instituto Argentino de Nivología, Glaciología y Ciencias Ambientales (IANIGLA), CCT CONICET Mendoza, CC 330 Mendoza, Argentina h INSTAAR and Geological Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, USA i Department of Earth Science, University of Bergen, Allegaten 41, N-5007 Bergen, Norway j Uni Research Climate AS at Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Bergen, Norway k Institute of Geography, University of Innsbruck, Innrain 52, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria l Department of Geology,
    [Show full text]
  • ADRENALIN + ZEN the Alpina Gstaad Offers New 2016/2017 Winter Program
    ADRENALIN + ZEN The Alpina Gstaad Offers New 2016/2017 Winter Program GSTAAD, Switzerland, November 3, 2016 – The award-winning Alpina Gstaad likes to keep one step ahead of its very discerning guests. As the newest luxury hotel to open in 100 years in the Swiss Alpine village, The Alpina Gstaad is launching a new ski and snowboard program for the 2016/2017 winter season. The four-day, three- night Adrenalin + Zen experience includes a helicopter ride from Saanen over the picturesque Bernese Oberland countryside landing on top of Glacier 3000 for a day of off piste skiing or snowboarding with a private guide. From Glacier 3000 at 9,727 feet high, skiers can view a panorama of 24 mountain peaks including the Eiger, Mönch, Jungfrau, Matterhorn, Grand Combin and the famed Mont Blanc. The 350-foot Peak Walk, a suspension bridge linking two mountain tops, provides another thrilling experience. The Alpina Gstaad's Adrenalin + Zen program begins with a 30-minute Dry Land Warm-up and includes a private ski instructor guide as well as a luxury lunch bag. After a day on the slopes, a private limousine will take guests back to the luxury hotel where they will have a 30-minute Chakra Balancing with Crystals. From December 8, 2016 through March 19, 2017, the three-night Adrenalin + Zen package costs CHF 3200 CHF (about US$ 3,285) per person, double occupancy and covers the ski instructor, a 30-minute helicopter trip and limo transfers, luxury lunch bag, the spa treatment and accommodations in a Deluxe Room Schönried, daily breakfast, a culinary credit of CHF 100 per person daily (for the hotel's restaurants: Sommet, MEGU and Swiss Stübli), all taxes, service and VAT.
    [Show full text]
  • 19Th Century Glacier Representations and Fluctuations in the Central and Western European Alps: an Interdisciplinary Approach ⁎ ⁎ H.J
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Global and Planetary Change 60 (2008) 42–57 www.elsevier.com/locate/gloplacha 19th century glacier representations and fluctuations in the central and western European Alps: An interdisciplinary approach ⁎ ⁎ H.J. Zumbühl , D. Steiner , S.U. Nussbaumer Institute of Geography, University of Bern, Hallerstrasse 12, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland Received in revised form 22 August 2006; accepted 24 August 2006 Available online 22 February 2007 Abstract European Alpine glaciers are sensitive indicators of past climate and are thus valuable sources of climate history. Unfortunately, direct determinations of glacier changes (length variations and mass changes) did not start with increasing accuracy until just before the end of the 19th century. Therefore, historical and physical methods have to be used to reconstruct glacier variability for preceeding time periods. The Lower Grindelwald Glacier, Switzerland, and the Mer de Glace, France, are examples of well-documented Alpine glaciers with a wealth of different historical sources (e.g. drawings, paintings, prints, photographs, maps) that allow reconstruction of glacier length variations for the last 400–500 years. In this paper, we compare the length fluctuations of both glaciers for the 19th century until the present. During the 19th century a majority of Alpine glaciers – including the Lower Grindelwald Glacier and the Mer de Glace – have been affected by impressive glacier advances. The first maximum extent around 1820 has been documented by drawings from the artist Samuel Birmann, and the second maximum extent around 1855 is shown by photographs of the Bisson Brothers. These pictorial sources are among the best documents of the two glaciers for the 19th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Über Eiger, Mönch Und Jungfrau an Einem Tag: Profi-Bergsteigerueli STECK Schafft Diese Weite Und Glücksgefühl Ausgesetzte Gratkletterei in 16 Stunden Und 10 Minuten
    Ueli im Hoch Über Eiger, Mönch und Jungfrau an einem Tag: Profi-BergsteigerUELI STECK schafft diese weite und Glücksgefühl ausgesetzte Gratkletterei in 16 Stunden und 10 Minuten. Ueli Steck steht einsam und alleine Alleine, ungesichert und ohne Bergbahn. auf der Jungfrau (4158 m). Im ge- waltigen Hoch- gebirge wirkt ein Mensch wie ein Zwerg am Berg. Nach Eiger und Mönch ist dies sein dritter Gipfel an diesem Tag. SCHWEIZER ILLUSTRIERTE 49 Fast oben Solo-Kletterer Balance-Akt Auf dem Ueli Steck auf den letz- schmalen Ostegggrat ten Metern zum Eiger- hinauf zum Eiger. Gegen Gipfel (3970 m). 30 Alpi- Norden geht der Blick nisten hat er auf dem 2000 Meter hinab nach Mittellegigrat überholt. Grindelwald. Ueli rennt nicht. Aber er ist zügig im Trittsicher Ueli Steck bewegt sich ungesichert «Steck-Schritt» und furchtlos, als wäre er im Tal auf dem Trottoir. unterwegs Im Hintergrund: das Grosse Fiescherhorn (4049 m). SCHWEIZER ILLUSTRIERTE 51 Nebel zieht auf Ueli Steck eilt über den anspruchsvollen Ost- grat auf die Jungfrau. Die Schneewechten sind tückisch. Am Abend sind die Füsse von Steck aufgequollen, weil seine Spezialschuhe nicht ganz dicht sind Start Steck beginnt seine Achtung Nichts hält Zwischenhalt Corinne, die Mittel- monströse Solo-Tour um ihn ab – auch nicht legi-Hüttenwartin, bereitet Lasagne 3.04 Uhr. Vom Bahnhof das Stopp-Schild auf für das Znacht vor, als Steck Grindelwald läuft er los. dem Jungfraujoch. um 7 Uhr in der Früh vorbeikommt. 52 SCHWEIZER ILLUSTRIERTE SCHWEIZER ILLUSTRIERTE 53 Schnee und ewiges Eis im Hochsommer Kräftezehrend Auf dem Nordostgrat am Mönch liegt hoher Schnee, von der Sonne aufgeweicht und schwer.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Glacier Thickness Distribution and Bed Topography Over Entire Mountain Ranges with Glabtop: Application of a Fast and Robust Approach
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2012 Modeling glacier thickness distribution and bed topography over entire mountain ranges with GlabTop: Application of a fast and robust approach Linsbauer, Andreas ; Paul, Frank ; Haeberli, Wilfried Abstract: The combination of glacier outlines with digital elevation models (DEMs) opens new dimen- sions for research on climate change impacts over entire mountain chains. Of particular interest is the modeling of glacier thickness distribution, where several new approaches were proposed recently. The tool applied herein, GlabTop (Glacier bed Topography) is a fast and robust approach to model thickness distribution and bed topography for large glacier samples using a Geographic Information System (GIS). The method is based on an empirical relation between average basal shear stress and elevation range of individual glaciers, calibrated with geometric information from paleoglaciers, and validated with radio echo soundings on contemporary glaciers. It represents an alternative and independent test possibility for approaches based on mass-conservation and flow. As an example for using GlabTop in entire mountain ranges, we here present the modeled ice thickness distribution and bed topography for all Swiss glaciers along with a geomorphometric analysis of glacier characteristics and the overdeepenings found in the modeled glacier bed. These overdeepenings can be seen as potential sites for future lake formation and are thus highly relevant in connection with hydropower production and natural hazards. The thickest ice of the largest glaciers rests on weakly inclined bedrock at comparably low elevations, resulting in a limited potential for a terminus retreat to higher elevations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aletsch Arena – the Most Libera.Ng Natural Experience in The
    The Aletsch Arena – the most libera2ng natural experience in the Alps! MICE Program proposi2on - 4 days/3 nights Discover a unique natural landscape with a special, unspoilt character all of its own. The three holiday and tourist des2na2ons of Riederalp, BeLmeralp and Fiesch-Eggishorn are situated close to the 23km Great Aletsch Glacier, the largest of its kind in the Alps and undisputed highlight of the UNESCO Swiss Alps Jungfrau-Aletsch World Heritage Site. In summer, the car-free Aletsch Arena offers 317km of hiking paths, via ferrata, treetop adventure courses, mountain bike trails, paragliding flights, three viewpoints, the Pro Natura Centre and the highest nine-hole golf course in Europe. Authen2c relaxa2on or cool adventures. ! Infrastructure Hotels Others Holiday apartments Classificaon Beds Accommoda5on Numbe Classificaon Beds r 4 star **** 244 Group accommoda2ons, 5 star ***** 252 Guesthouses and Youth 3 star *** 892 4 star **** 1075 hostels 18 2 star ** 118 3 star *** 3791 No classifica2on 320 Swiss Olympic Training Base 1 2 star ** 550 How to find us aletscharena.ch/geng-here Riederalp, BeLmeralp and Fiesch-Eggishorn are the three holiday resorts at the heart of the Aletsch Arena in the canton of Valais. They can be reached safely and easily by car or train at any 2me of year. Riederalp, BeLmeralp and Fiescheralp are all car free! The final part of the journey takes place by cable car from the sta2ons in Mörel, BeLen Valley or Fiesch. Day 1 11:00 – 11:30 Arrive in the Aletsch Arena (Riederalp, BeLmeralp or Fiesch-Eggishorn) Three viewpoints (Moosfluh, BeLmerhorn or Eggishorn) Hohfluh and Moosfluh – magnificent vantage points by the Great Aletsch Glacier The Moosfluh viewpoint, a high-energy site, is situated at 2,333m above sea level, close to the Hohfluh viewpoint at an al2tude of 2,227m.
    [Show full text]