Health Impact Assessment: Concepts and Guidelines for the Americas Health Impact Assessment: Concepts and Guidelines for the Americas

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Health Impact Assessment: Concepts and Guidelines for the Americas Health Impact Assessment: Concepts and Guidelines for the Americas Special Program on Sustainable Development and Health Equity Washington, D.C., 2013 Also published in Spanish (2013) with the title: Conceptos y guía de análisis de impacto en salud para la Región de las Américas ISBN 978-92-75-31805-8 PAHO HQ Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data ************************************************************************ Pan American Health Organization. Health Impact Assessment: Concepts and Guidelines for the Americas. Washington, DC : PAHO, 2013. 1. Health Impact Assessment – trends. 2. Public Policies. 3. Environmental Impact. 4. Equity in Health. 5. Coverage Equity. 6. Americas. I. Title. II. Raúl Sánchez-Kobashi M. III. Antonio J. Berlanga-Taylor. ISBN 978-92-75-11805-4 (NLM classification: WA 30.5) The Pan American Health Organization welcomes requests for permission to reproduce or translate its publications, in part or in full. Applications and inquiries should be addressed to the Department of Knowledge Management and Communications (KMC), Pan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C., U.S.A. ([email protected]). The Special Program on Sustainable Development and Health Equity will be glad to provide the latest information on any changes made to the text, plans for new editions, and reprints and translations already available. © Pan American Health Organization, 2013. All rights reserved. Publications of the Pan American Health Organization enjoy copyright protection in accordance with the provisions of Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. All rights are reserved. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the Pan American Health Organization concerning the status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the Pan American Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters. All reasonable precautions have been taken by the Pan American Health Organization to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall the Pan American Health Organization be liable for damages arising from its use. Table of Contents Abbreviations .............................................................................................................................................................v I. Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................1 II. Impact Assessment ...........................................................................................................................5 II.1 Origin and Definition of Impact Assessment (IA) .........................................................................7 II.2 Impact Evaluation or Impact Assessment? ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������10 II.3 Methods for Impact Assessment .................................................................................................11 II.4 Impact Assessment in the Public Policy-Making Process .........................................................13 II.5 Culture of Evaluation and Health Impact Assessment in the Americas .................................14 III. Health Impact Assessment ..........................................................................................................19 III.1 Introduction, Definition, and Origin of Health Impact Assessment ..........................................21 III.2 Concepts of Health Impact Assessment �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������24 III.3 Social Determinants of Health and Health Inequities ...............................................................30 III.4 Health in All Policies �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������33 III.5 Implementation of Health Impact Assessment at the Global and Regional Levels .............34 III.6 Legislation Related to Health Impact Assessment ....................................................................38 IV. Methodology for Health Impact Assessment.........................................................................39 IV.1 Scientific Basis of HIA Methodology ............................................................................................41 IV.2 Steps to Take when Preparing a Health Impact Assessment ...................................................43 IV.3 Minimum Elements and General Guidelines for Conducting a Health Impact Assessment ...........................................................................................................55 V. Examples of Health Impact Assessment ..................................................................................57 V.1 The Example of the United States: Strategic Level �������������������������������������������������������������������59 V.2 The European Example: Policy Level �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������60 VI. Conclusions ........................................................................................................................................61 References .................................................................................................................................................................65 Health Impact Assessment: Concepts and Guidelines for the Americas iii Annexes ......................................................................................................................................................................73 Figures Figure II.1 Basic steps for carrying out and impact assessment ......................................................................11 Figure II.2 Impact assessment in the planning process .....................................................................................14 Figure III.1 Levels of decision-making ....................................................................................................................21 Figure III.2 Milestones in the evolution of health impact assessment ..............................................................23 Figure III.3 Causal relations in an alcohol policy .................................................................................................27 Figure III.4 Type of evidence used in health impact assessment .....................................................................28 Figure III.5 Conceptual framework of social determinants of health, WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health .........................................................................................................................31 Figure III.6 Probability of reporting poor health in people over age 15, by income bracket (Chile, 2000) .............................................................................................................................32 Figure III.7 Effects of combined nutritional supplementation and psychosocial stimulation on stunted children in a two-year intervention study in Jamaica .....................................................................32 Figure III.8 Distribution of infant mortality by expenditure decile* (Mexico, 2000) .........................................33 Figure IV.1 Flowchart showing the roles of publicly available evidence, local data, and stakeholders’ experience in the process of health impact assessment (HIA) ����������������������������������������������������41 Figure IV.2 Steps to follow in a health impact assessment ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������54 Tables Table III.1 Schools of thought in the area of health impact assessment ............................................. ���������25 Table III.2 Types of health impact assessment ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 29 Table III.3 Number of health impact assessments prepared per country in Europe (1994–2005) .............35 Table III.4 Health impact assessment by sector in Europe (1994-2005) .......................................................... 36 Table IV.1 Format of a health impact matrix ...................................................................................................... 51 Table IV.2 Matrix for summarizing the results of the health impact assessment and formulating the recommendations ................................................................................................53 iv Health Impact Assessment: Concepts and Guidelines for the Americas Abbreviations CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CGE Computable general equilibrium CSDH Commission on Social Determinants of Health EC European Commission ECPH European Centre for Health Policy EHIA Environmental and health impact assessment
Recommended publications
  • A Health Impact Assessment in Harris County, Texas ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    A Health Impact Assessment in Harris County, Texas ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    East Aldine District’s Town Center Development: A Health Impact Assessment in Harris County, Texas ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project was supported by a grant from the Health Impact Project, a collaboration of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and The Pew Charitable Trusts, with funding from the Episcopal Health Foundation. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Health Impact Project, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, The Pew Charitable Trusts, or the Episcopal Health Foundation. SPECIAL THANKS The authors would like to thank the following for their support and contributions to the HIA: Christy Lambright and the Harris County Community Services Department staff; Victor Caballero, Montserrat Encontra, Katharine Kuzmyak, Aman Narayan, Anna Wheless, and Manlin Yao for assisting with data collection and analysis; and James Llamas for aiding in the interpretations of the Traffic Impact Analysis conducted for the East Aldine District Town Center. PRINCIPAL AUTHORS HIA STAFF CONTRIBUTORS Patricia L. Cummings, MPH, PhD Victoria Adaramola, MBA Program Manager and Principal Investigator Public Health Associate, Centers for Disease Control Built Environment & Health Impact Assessment Unit and Prevention Environmental Public Health Division Built Environment & Health Impact Assessment Unit Harris County Public Health (HCPH) Environmental Public Health Division, HCPH Ellen Schwaller, MUEP Jocelyn Hwang, MPH Community Health & Design Coordinator Research Analyst Built Environment & Health Impact Assessment Unit Built Environment & Health Impact Assessment Unit Environmental Public Health Division, HCPH Environmental Public Health Division, HCPH Sarah Wesely, MPH Robert Martinez, BS Research Analyst Team Lead GIS Coordinator Built Environment & Health Impact Assessment Unit Built Environment & Health Impact Assessment Unit Environmental Public Health Division, HCPH Environmental Public Health Division, HCPH Laura E.
  • Health in Impact Assessments: Opportunities Not to Be Missed

    Health in Impact Assessments: Opportunities Not to Be Missed

    The WHO Regional HEALTH IN IMPACT ASSESSMENTS Office for Europe Opportunities not to be missed The World Health Organization (WHO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations created in 1948 with the primary responsibility for international health matters and public health. The WHO Regional Office for Europe is one of six regional offices throughout the world, each with its own programme geared to the particular health conditions of the Prospective impact assessment is a consolidated approach for countries it serves. pursuing foresight in policy and decision-making, systematically Member States deployed worldwide. There is consensus that, even in well developed impact assessments, human health is not always Albania Andorra covered adequately. Partly as a response, health impact Armenia assessment (HIA) has emerged and has been applied in several Austria Azerbaijan countries in Europe and beyond. Opinions about the merits of HIA Belarus separate from other forms of impact assessment differ. This Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina publication aims to provide a detailed and balanced view on Bulgaria “health in impact assessments”. Five key types of impact Croatia Cyprus assessment, namely environmental impact assessment, strategic Czech Republic environmental assessment, social impact assessment, Denmark sustainability assessment, and HIA are presented, and four key Estonia Finland questions are discussed: How can the various assessments France contribute to promoting and protecting human health? How can Georgia Germany further integration of health support the various forms of impact Greece assessments? What forms of integration seem advisable? What Hungary Iceland priorities for further development? This analysis suggests that the Ireland potential of impact assessments to protect and promote health is Israel Italy underutilized, and represents a missed opportunity.
  • Health Impact Assessment of Air Pollution in the Eight Major Italian Cities

    Health Impact Assessment of Air Pollution in the Eight Major Italian Cities

    EURO/02/5040650 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF AIR POLLUTION IN THE EIGHT MAJOR ITALIAN CITIES HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF AIR POLLUTION IN THE EIGHT MAJOR ITALIAN CITIES By MARCO MARTUZZI WHO European Centre for Environment and Health Rome Operational Division WHO Regional Office for Europe CLAUDIA GALASSI Regional Agency for Health, Bologna, Italy BART OSTRO Air Pollution Epidemiology Unit California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) FRANCESCO FORASTIERE Department of Epidemiology, Rome Health Authority, Rome, Italy ROBERTO BERTOLLINI WHO European Centre for Environment and Health Rome Operational Division WHO Regional Office for Europe ABSTRACT The report contains the health impact assessment of urban air pollution in the eight major Italian cities; it gives estimates of mortality, morbidity and numbers days of restricted activity associated with air pollution level. The report illustrates the methodology, discusses scientific uncertainty and implications for findings as well as for the need for further research. Due to the methodological discussion and to its practical application in quantifying health effects of air pollution exposure, the report is also recommended as a handbook for local health officers. The case study and methodological tools can support Member States in implementing and developing environmental health policies. The dissemination of the report, among health officers and local government officers in Europe will increase awareness of air pollution related health effects and
  • John Snow, Cholera and the Mystery of the Broad Street Pump PDF Book Well Written and Easy to Read, Despite of the Heavy Subject

    John Snow, Cholera and the Mystery of the Broad Street Pump PDF Book Well Written and Easy to Read, Despite of the Heavy Subject

    THE MEDICAL DETECTIVE: JOHN SNOW, CHOLERA AND THE MYSTERY OF THE BROAD STREET PUMP PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Sandra Hempel | 304 pages | 06 Aug 2007 | GRANTA BOOKS | 9781862079373 | English | London, United Kingdom The Medical Detective: John Snow, Cholera and the Mystery of the Broad Street Pump PDF Book Well written and easy to read, despite of the heavy subject. When people didb't believe the doctor who proposed the answer and suggested a way to stop the spread of such a deadly disease, I wanted to scream in frustration! He first published his theory in an essay, On the Mode of Communication of Cholera , [21] followed by a more detailed treatise in incorporating the results of his investigation of the role of the water supply in the Soho epidemic of Snow did not approach cholera from a scientific point of view. Sandra Hempel. John Snow. The city had widened the street and the cesspit was lost. He showed that homes supplied by the Southwark and Vauxhall Waterworks Company , which was taking water from sewage-polluted sections of the Thames , had a cholera rate fourteen times that of those supplied by Lambeth Waterworks Company , which obtained water from the upriver, cleaner Seething Wells. Sandra Hempel did a fantastic job with grabbing attention of the reader and her experience with journalism really shows itself in this book. He then repeated the procedure for the delivery of her daughter three years later. View 2 comments. Episode 6. The author did a wonderful job of keeping me interested in what could have been a fairly dry subject.
  • Use of Health Impact Assessment in the U.S. 27 Case Studies, 1999-2007

    Use of Health Impact Assessment in the U.S. 27 Case Studies, 1999-2007

    Use of Health Impact Assessment in the U.S. 27 Case Studies, 1999–2007 Andrew L. Dannenberg, MD, MPH, Rajiv Bhatia, MD, MPH, Brian L. Cole, DrPH, Sarah K. Heaton, MPH, Jason D. Feldman, MPH, Candace D. Rutt, PhD Objectives: To document the growing use in the United States of health impact assessment (HIA) methods to help planners and others consider the health consequences of their decisions. Methods: Using multiple search strategies, 27 HIAs were identified that were completed in the U.S. during 1999 –2007. Key characteristics of each HIA were abstracted from published and unpublished sources. Results: Topics examined in these HIAs ranged from policies about living wages and after-school programs to projects about power plants and public transit. Most HIAs were funded by local health departments, foundations, or federal agencies. Concerns about health disparities were especially important in HIAs on housing, urban redevelopment, home energy subsidies, and wage policy. The use of quantitative and nonquantitative methods varied among HIAs. Most HIAs presented recommendations for policy or project changes to improve health. Impacts of the HIAs were infrequently documented. Conclusions: These completed HIAs are useful for helping conduct future HIAs and for training public health officials and others about HIAs. More work is needed to document the impact of HIAs and thereby increase their value in decision-making processes. (Am J Prev Med 2008;34(3):241–256) © 2008 American Journal of Preventive Medicine Introduction needed: (1) to increase awareness of their use across the country, (2) to document that HIAs are applicable he use of health impact assessment (HIA) has in U.S.
  • Health Literacy: Global Advances with a Focus Upon the Shanghai Declaration on Promoting Health in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development

    Health Literacy: Global Advances with a Focus Upon the Shanghai Declaration on Promoting Health in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development

    Information Services & Use 40 (2020) 3–16 3 DOI 10.3233/ISU-200080 IOS Press Health literacy: Global advances with a focus upon the Shanghai Declaration on promoting health in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Andrew Pleasanta,∗, Catina O’Learya and Richard Carmonaa,b,c aHealth Literacy Media, St. Louis, MO, USA bCanyon Ranch, Tucson, AZ, USA c17th Surgeon General of the United States, USA Abstract. In a steadily growing effort, the world has witnessed more than three decades of effort in research, practice, and policy to socially construct what has been identified as ‘health literacy. While much of the earlier work in health literacy was in the United States, the extent of scholars and practitioners is now truly global. To advance international health literacy, the chapter highlights the role of the World Health Organization (WHO) and a series of international conferences that began in 1980s. More specifically, the chapter outlines World Health Organization’s overarching health literacy efforts, notes the importance of health literacy within WHO’s new organization structure, briefly describes how the concept of health literacy emerged throughout a generation of the WHO’s international conferences, suggests an ethical foundation for the WHO’s health literacy work, and explains how the groundwork set by the WHO provides some challenges and foundations for future health literacy research and practice. Keywords: Health literacy, World Health Organization, sustainable international development, ethics 1. Introduction On one hand, there is nothing unique in human experience about the skills, abilities, and resources identified within the theories, definitions, conceptual frameworks, understandings, or rhetoric about health literacy.
  • I Would Like to Acknowledge the Comments and Additions Suggested

    I Would Like to Acknowledge the Comments and Additions Suggested

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 5. Krieger N, Northridge M, Gruskin S, Quinn M, Kriebel D, Davey Smith G, et al. Assessing health impact assessment: I would like to acknowledge the comments and additions Multidisciplinary and international perspectives. J Epidemiol suggested by members of the Environmental Health and Community Health 2003; 57: 659–62. Branch, NSW Health, and by journal reviewers. 6. Hunter D. Ch 2: The relationship between health and health care. In Public Health Policy. Polity Press, 2003. REFERENCES 7. Landy MK, Roberts MJ, Thomas SR. The Environmental 1. Cole BL, Wilhelm M, Long PV, Fielding JE, Kominski G, Protection Agency: Asking the wrong questions from Nixon Morgenstern H. Prospects for health impact assessment in to Clinton. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994. the United States: New and improved environmental impact 8. Vineyard to Rouse Hill electricity upgrade—Independent assessment or something different? Journal of Health Politics, report to examine the cost of the options for the upgrade. Policy & Law 2004; 29(6): 1153–86. November 2004. Maunsell Australia Pty Ltd. Available from 2. Beder S. Early environmentalists and the battle against sewers the Integral energy website at: www.integral.com.au/index. in Sydney, Royal Australian Historical Society Journal 1990; cfm?objectid=B05033AF-8028-BBAF-106908876245FC3A. 76(1): 27–44. Accessed 9 November 2005. 3. Legislative Council. General Purpose Standing Committee. 9. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Register. Public Report on Inquiry into Northside Storage Tunnel—Scotts Health Assessments. Available at www.atsdr.cdc.gov/HAC/ Creek Vent. Parliamentary paper No. 453, 2000. PHA/, accessed 9 November 2005. 4. Legislative Council.
  • Health in All Policies (Hiap): Frequently Asked Questions

    Health in All Policies (Hiap): Frequently Asked Questions

    Health in All Policies (HiAP): Frequently Asked Questions 1. What is Health in All Policies (HiAP)? HiAP is a strategy to assist leaders and policymakers in integrating considerations of health, well-being, and equity during the development, implementation, and evaluation of policies and services. HiAP strategies are meant to ensure that all policies and services from all sectors have beneficial or neutral impacts on the determinants of health. 1 2. How does HiAP differ from health impact assessment (HIA)? HIA is a tool that local health departments and others can use to assess a single proposed decision and its potential impact on health. 2 HiAP is an approach that uses multiple strategies to systematize and integrate the governmental decision-making process across agencies so that health is considered.1 HIA is one tool that can be used as part of a larger array of tactics to address the determinants of health through HiAP. 3. What is the difference between HiAP and Healthy Public Policies? “Healthy public policies” is a precursor to HiAP that emerged in the 1980s to put health on policymakers’ agendas. Healthy public policies tended to focus on the process of policymaking and achieving incremental change. 1 HiAP is a paradigm shift of whole-of- government, horizontal health governance, where health becomes systemized as a standard part of the policy-formation process, and agencies are driven to integrate the policy formation process under a health lens. 1 4. What is the history of HiAP? Emerging in 2006, HiAP was a major theme during the Finnish Presidency of the EU with the aim of strengthening existing legislation that required ensuring human protection in the formation and implementation of policies.3 It sought to create large, horizontal systems change that changed how all of government functioned.
  • Health Impact Assessment: Evidence on Health

    Health Impact Assessment: Evidence on Health

    Health Impact Assessment: evidence on health A guide to sources of evidence for policymakers carrying out Health Impact Assessment as part of Impact Assessment of government policy How to carry out good quality HIAs 3 Use HIA screening questions 3 Make it evidence-based 3 Look for positive health impacts 3 Think beyond the health service when considering health Health Impact Assessment: evidence on health A guide to sources of evidence for policymakers carrying out Health Impact Assessment as part of Impact Assessment of government policy Health Impact Assessment: evidence on health Authors: Nannerl Herriott, Colleen Williams, Erica Ison Publication date July 2010 Part of a series: Health Impact Assessment of Government Policy: A guide to carrying out a Health Impact Assessment of new policy as part of the Impact Assessment process Health Impact Assessment: Case studies from government departments Health Impact Assessment: A guide to quantifying health impacts of government policy Contents Introduction 2 1. Statisticsandepidemiologicaldata 3 2. Publishedreports,researchstudiesandgreyliterature 6 3. Qualitativeinformation,forexample,stakeholderexperienceandexpertopinion 13 4. Matrixofavailableevidence 15 1 Introduction The purpose of including Health Impact Assessment (HIA) in Impact Assessment of government policy is to ensure that all government departments are focused on achieving better health and wellbeing of communities, as an outcome of their policy initiatives and plans. Finding and appraising the available evidence is a necessary feature of a good Health Impact Assessment. There are many sources available from which to obtain this evidence. This guide does not seek to be comprehensive, but provides information and guidance on where to start. Consultation with a librarian/ information specialist before undertaking a literature search is also advised.
  • Health Impact Assessment Legislation in the States

    Health Impact Assessment Legislation in the States

    A brief from the Health Impact Project Feb 2015 Health Impact Assessment Legislation in the States Overview Health care consumes a large percentage of state budgets, and legislators are looking for ways to reduce those costs and improve the public’s health. One way to meet these goals is by identifying and addressing the health risks and benefits of public policy decisions made outside the health sector in areas such as transportation, housing, education, natural resources and energy, and the economy. Health impact assessments (HIAs) bring together public health expertise, scientific data, and stakeholder input to evaluate the potential health effects of proposed policy changes and to develop practical solutions that minimize risks and maximize health benefits. Government officials, academics, nongovernmental organizations, and industry have used this flexible, data- driven approach in communities across the country. HIAs can help state decision-makers and local communities craft smarter policies that protect the public’s health; facilitate collaboration between government agencies, health officials, and constituent groups; and streamline the way health concerns are integrated into policy decisions. According to the National Research Council, HIA is a promising tool to improve people’s health and decrease health care costs because of its “broad applicability, its focus on adverse and beneficial health effects, its ability to incorporate various types of evidence, and its emphasis on stakeholder participation.”1 The National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) in consultation with the Health Impact Project, a collaboration of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and The Pew Charitable Trusts, recently examined states that are considering the use or aspects of HIAs.
  • Health Impact Assessment

    Health Impact Assessment

    Health Impact Assessment (HIA) Health impact assessment (HIA) is commonly defined as “a combination of procedures, methods, and tools by which a policy, program, or project may be judged as to its potential effects on the health of a population, and the distribution of those effects within the population” (1999 Gothenburg consensus statement). HIA can be used to evaluate objectively the potential health effects of a project or policy before it is built or implemented. It can provide recommendations to increase positive health outcomes and minimize adverse health outcomes. A major benefit of the HIA process is that it brings public health issues to the attention of persons who make decisions about areas that fall outside of traditional public health arenas, such as transportation or land use. Major Steps The major steps in conducting an HIA include • screening (identify projects or policies for which an HIA would be useful), • scoping (identify which health effects to consider), • assessing risks and benefits (identify which people may be affected and how they may be affected), • developing recommendations (suggest changes to proposals to promote positive or mitigate adverse health effects), • reporting (present the results to decision-makers), and • evaluating (determine the affect of the HIA on the decision process). HIAs are similar in some ways to environmental impact assessments (EIAs), which are mandated processes that focus on environmental outcomes such as air and water quality. However, unlike EIAs, HIAs can be voluntary or regulatory processes that focus on health outcomes such as obesity, physical inactivity, asthma, injuries, and social equity. An HIA encompasses a heterogeneous array of qualitative and quantitative methods and tools.
  • Gothenburg Consensus Paper; Health Impact Assessment

    Gothenburg Consensus Paper; Health Impact Assessment

    Gothenburg consensus paper December, 1999 Main concepts and suggested approach European ECHP Centre for Health Policy WHO Regional Office for Europe Brussels, 1999 Health Impact Assessment: main concepts and suggested approach Gothenburg consensus paper, December 1999 Purpose of the Gothenburg consensus paper Health Impact Assessment (HIA) is a rapidly developing activity. The present paper is the first in a series intended to create a common understanding of HIA. It clarifies some of the main concepts and suggests a feasible approach to carrying out HIA at all levels (international, national and local). It is aimed mainly at policymakers and provides a departure point for discussion, comments and suggestions for the further development of the HIA approach and its related tools. Why do we need to develop Health impact Assessment ? Social, economic and other policies in both the public and private sectors are so closely interrelated that proposed decisions in one sector may impact on the objectives of other sectors. In recognition of this, specific legal and administrative rules, procedures and methods have already been developed in many countries to assess the impacts of policies for example on the environment, employment, economic growth or competition, on cultural and social factors, or on ethnic groups and gender. The general objective of such assessments is to improve knowledge about the potential impact of a policy or programme, inform decision-makers and affected people, and facilitate adjustment of the proposed policy in order to mitigate the negative and maximize the positive impacts. Although policies in other sectors can have a considerable influence on health and the production or prevention of illness, disability or death, this has so far only been considered to a limited degree, mainly in relation to environmental and social impact assessments.