DOCSLIB.ORG

Between Salmonidae and the Na Tive

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Between Salmonidae and the Na Tive 66 NATIVE AND INTRODUCED SPECIES IN NEW ZEALAND native species on various occasions; and the MARPLES, B. L 1942. A study of the little owl, Alhene noctua, in New Zealand. Tran.~. Rov. Soc. N.Z. 72: food of both native morepork and intro- - duced little owl includes small birds, either 237-252. MASTERS, S. E., HOLLOWAY,J. T. and McKELVEY, P. 1., native or introduced. 1957. The national forest survey of New Zealand, 1955. VoL I. Govt. Printer, Wel1ington. REFERENCES MOON, G. J. H., 1956. White-faced heron nesting in BULLER, W., 1905. Supplement to Birds of Ncw Zealand. North Auckland. Notornis 6: 244. , The Author, London. MYERS,J. G., 1923. The present position of the endemic CUMBERLAND,K. B., 1949. This is New Zealand. Whit~ birds of New Zealand. NZ. Journ. Sci. Tech. 6: 65- 99. combe & Tombs, ChristChurch. THOM'SON,G. M., 1922. The lIafllralisation of animah Gum, J. A., 1961. Ecology of the birds of Kaingaroa and plants in New Zealand. Cambridge University Forest. Proc. N.Z. Eco/. Soc. 8: 29-38. Press. GUTHRIE-SMITH, H., 1921 and later editions. Tlaira. Blackwood, London. TURBon, E. G., 1953. Notes on the occurrence of the bellbird in North Auckland. Notornis 5: 175-17&. LA<:K, D., 1933. Habitat selection in birds. with special reference to the effects of afforestation on the Rreck- TURBOIT,E. G., 1957. Native and introduced birds. In land avifauna. J. Anim. Ecol. 2: 239-262. Science in New Zealand. Reed, Wellington. LACK,D., 1939. Further changes in the Breckland avi~ WODZICKI, K. A., 1950. Introduced mammals of New fauna caused by afforestation. J. Anim. Ecof. 8: Zealand: an ecological and economic survey. Bull. 277-285. Dept. ScL Ind. Re,~. 9&. RELATIONS BETWEEN SALMONIDAE AND THE NA TIVE FRESHWATER FAUNA IN NEW ZEALAND K. RADWAY ALLEN Fisheries Laboratory, N.Z. Marine Department The freshwaters of New Zealand provide dae since in its native Northern Hemisphere an environment into which relatively few this family contains the majority of the most exotic species have penetra ted, partly be- highly regarded game species. Of the species cause the problems of survival during that were introduced, two have established transportation are so difficult for a fresh- themselves successfully over a large part of water animal as to make accidental immi- the country, and a third in a more restricted gration very unlikely, and partly because the area. These are the brown and rainbow motives which may stimulate deliberate trouts (Salina trutta and S. gairdnerii) and importation by man are so few in this case. the quinn at salmon (Oncorhynchus tscha- So much remains to be done in the studv wytcha) respectively. A few other species of our freshwater fauna that a number of exist in small numbers in limited areas. For exotic species of the smaller invertebrates simplicity, I propose to limit consideration may exist unrecorded in this country, but of the introduced freshwater fauna largely the known freshwater fauna of non-native to these few highly successful species of origin is limited to one snail and some dozen Salmonidae; both because of their wide- species of fish all deliberately introduced. spread abundance and because, on account of their popular esteem, they have been Most of the fish were introduced to provide relatively intensively studied. sport, and it is not surprising that a large proportion of them belong to the Salmoni- It should be realised that fresh waters ALLEN: SAI"lvl0NIDAE AND FRESH\VATER FAUNA 67 do not constitute an environment entirely of our lakes contain numerous small native isolated from those which surround it. Manv fish which provide good trout food; the animals of a variety of groups divide theli- large populations of fast-growing trout in time between freshwater and either land many of the lakes of the Rotorua district or air, either intermittently, or at set stages are, for instance, enabled to develop by the of their life history. It is therefore necessarv abundant smelt stocks in these lakes. to refer occasionally to events occurring out- side the limits of the watery environment. While it is thus a simple matter to declare that New Zealand freshwaters now contain Since it is almost axiomatic that game a native fauna of small animals which is fish should be carnivorous, it follows that generally suflicient to support strong popu- one of the principal impacts of the Salmoni- lations of introduced salmonids, it is much dae on the native freshwater fauna is their less simple to determine what effect, if anv, predation on small native animals, both the salmonids have had upon the original vertebrate and invertebrate. The converse fauna before the present position was is, of course, also true; that the native reached. The difficulty arises partly from the fauna may, by variations in its composition almost complete lack of observations com- and abundance, play an important part in. paring the fauna of waters before and aftcr determining the density and structure of the the introduction of salmonids, partly from introduced fish populations. the scarcity at the present time of really The principal food of the Salmonidae in comparable waters, some of which contain almost all waters is derived from the inverte- trout and some of which do not, and partlv brate bottom fauna and from small fish. from the other environmental changes which The degree to which the various species are have taken place simultaneously with the eaten depends upon their abundance and establishment of salmon ids in New Zealand. upon the extent to which their habits and These environmental changes include both structure make them available to and eat- physical changes like the increased instabil- able by the fish (Allen 1941). The latter mav, ity and destruction of pools which often in turn, be considerably affected by the size follow the clearing of catchment areas, and of the fish themselves; the larger the fish, biological changes such as the introduction the larger the animals which it eats, and the of insectivorous birds which may prey on more easily are hard-shelled forms con- the winged stages of insects with aquatic sumed. Among the invertebrates the princi- larvae. pal groups eaten by stream-living Salmoni- dae in almost all countries are Chironomidae, Workers on various native aquatic animals Ephemeroptera, Trichoptera and Mollusca, have realised that the species they werc the fish tending to advance through a sequence interested in were subject to predation by in this order as they increase in size. In lalres trout and have suggested that this might considerably greater diversity occurs. Small threaten their survival. Generally however fish are mainly eaten by the larger salmonids. little evidence has been adduced as to the the particular species consumed varying actual extent of the threat and one cannot according to the composition of the local avoid the feelino; that sentiment has played fauna; in New Zealand the forms mainly an undue part in the formation of some of eaten are bullies (Gobiomorphus and Philyp- the opinions expressed. In 1915 a paper nodon spp.) and smelts (Retropinna spp.). dealing with the freshwater crayfish (Paran- ephrops spP.) declared "It is evident that jn The native invertebrate fauna of most of common with other members of our native our rivers and streams is generally of about freshwater fauna, the crayfish are being the same level of abundance as that of thc destroyed by eels and the introduced fishes. north temperate region; for instance, there Trout - have been caught with partially would commonly be between 100 and 1000 digested crayfish in their stomachs, and it is animals over about 3mm. in length for each probable that the restriction of crayfish to square foot of stream bed. This fauna is such places as cannot be inhabited bv these clearly sufficiently abundant to support good fish is only a matter of time". Now, 45 years trout populations in waters where condi- later. there are still lakes and rivers in which tions are otherwise suitable. Similarlv., man"., crayfish are abundant despite the presence 68 NATIVE ANn INTRODUCED SPECIES IN NEW ZEALAND , of numerous trout, and there is little doubt amount of pools and other shelter, the cxtent that here, as in the northern hemisphere, of possible habitat for this genus has prob- trout and crayfish can exist side by side in a ably been drastically reduced. It is interest- balanced relationship. ing that one of the few localities where it occurs regularly near Wellington is at the Among the mayflies there are some forms, mouth of a tributarv stream where in times particularly the various species of Deleati- of flood quiet conditions due to backing up dium, which can maintain themselves iu from the parent river occur instead of the very large numbers despite the fact that usual scouring. they are freely eaten by trout. In the Horo- kiwi Stream, for instance, in 1940 they An opportunity has arisen for studying generally occurred at a density of 50 to 100 the effects of the introduction of rainbow per sq. ft. despite the fact that they made trout in L. Waingata in Northland. There up 60-90 per cent. of the food of trout in is some evidence, for instance, that the fresh- their first nine months. It has been suggested water crab, Hymenosoma lacustris, which however that other mayflies, and particu- was previously fairly common in the lake, larly Oniscigaster, are more vulnerable to may have diminished considerably in num- trout and that this may ultimately cause bers since the introduction of trout. their extinction (Till yard 1926). Some direct evidence regarding reduction in the Work has recently started on certain tribu- numbers of O.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • If I Catch It, Can I Eat It? a Guide to Eating Fish Safely, 2017 Connecticut
    If I Catch It, This pamphlet will give you information that will help your family avoid chemicals in fish and eat fish safely. Fish from Connecticut’s waters are a healthy, low-cost source of protein. Conne<ti<ut Oep.trtment Unfortunately, some fish take up chemicals such as mercury and polychlorinated of Public Health Can I Eat It? biphenyls (PCBs). These chemicals can build up in your body and increase health risks. The developing fetus and young children are most sensitive. Women who eat A Guide to Eating Fish Safely fish containing these chemicals before or during pregnancy or nursing may have 2017 Connecticut Fish Consumption Advisory children who are slow to develop and learn. Long term exposure to PCBs may increase cancer risk. What Does The Fish Consumption Advisory Say? The advisory tells you how often you can safely eat fish from Connecticut’s waters and from a store or restaurant. In many cases, separate advice is given for the High Risk and Low Risk Groups. You are in the High Risk Group if you are a pregnant woman, a woman who could become pregnant, a nursing mother, or a child under six. If you do not fit into the High Risk Group, you are in the Low Risk Group. Advice is given for three different types of fish consumption: 1. Statewide FRESHWATER Fish Advisory: Most freshwater fish in Connecticut contain enough mercury to cause some limit to consumption. The statewide freshwater advice is that: High Risk Group: eat no more than 1 meal per month Low Risk Group: eat no more than 1 meal per week 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Edna Assay Development
    Environmental DNA assays available for species detection via qPCR analysis at the U.S.D.A Forest Service National Genomics Center for Wildlife and Fish Conservation (NGC). Asterisks indicate the assay was designed at the NGC. This list was last updated in June 2021 and is subject to change. Please contact [email protected] with questions. Family Species Common name Ready for use? Mustelidae Martes americana, Martes caurina American and Pacific marten* Y Castoridae Castor canadensis American beaver Y Ranidae Lithobates catesbeianus American bullfrog Y Cinclidae Cinclus mexicanus American dipper* N Anguillidae Anguilla rostrata American eel Y Soricidae Sorex palustris American water shrew* N Salmonidae Oncorhynchus clarkii ssp Any cutthroat trout* N Petromyzontidae Lampetra spp. Any Lampetra* Y Salmonidae Salmonidae Any salmonid* Y Cottidae Cottidae Any sculpin* Y Salmonidae Thymallus arcticus Arctic grayling* Y Cyrenidae Corbicula fluminea Asian clam* N Salmonidae Salmo salar Atlantic Salmon Y Lymnaeidae Radix auricularia Big-eared radix* N Cyprinidae Mylopharyngodon piceus Black carp N Ictaluridae Ameiurus melas Black Bullhead* N Catostomidae Cycleptus elongatus Blue Sucker* N Cichlidae Oreochromis aureus Blue tilapia* N Catostomidae Catostomus discobolus Bluehead sucker* N Catostomidae Catostomus virescens Bluehead sucker* Y Felidae Lynx rufus Bobcat* Y Hylidae Pseudocris maculata Boreal chorus frog N Hydrocharitaceae Egeria densa Brazilian elodea N Salmonidae Salvelinus fontinalis Brook trout* Y Colubridae Boiga irregularis Brown tree snake*
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Fish Culture
    FAU Institutional Repository http://purl.fcla.edu/fau/fauir This paper was submitted by the faculty of FAU’s Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute. Notice: © 1998 Kluwer. This manuscript is an author version with the final publication available and may be cited as: Tucker, J. W., Jr. (1998). Marine fish culture. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. MARINE FISH CULTURE by John W. Tucker, Jr., Ph.D. Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institution and Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne KLUWER ACADEMIC PUBLISHERS Boston I Dordrecht I London Distributors for North, Central and South America: Kluwer Academic Publishers I 01 Philip Drive Assinippi Park Norwell, Massachusetts 02061 USA Telephone (781) 871-6600 Fax (781) 871-6528 E-Mail <[email protected]> Distributors for all other countries: Kluwer Academic Publishers Group Distribution Centre Post Office Box 322 3300 AH Dordrecht, THE NETHERLANDS Telephone 31 78 6392 392 Fax 31 78 6546 474 E-Mail <[email protected]> '' Electronic Services <http://www.wkap.nl> Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Tucker, John W., 1948- Marine fish culture I by John W. Tucker, Jr. p. em. Includes bibliographical references (p. ) and index. ISBN 0-412-07151-7 (alk. paper) 1. Marine fishes. 2. Fish-culture. I. Title. SH163.T835 1998 639.3'2--dc21 98-42062 CIP Copyright © 1998 by Kluwer Academic Publishers All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, mechanical, photo­ copying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher, Kluwer Academic Publishers, I 0 I Philip Drive, Assinippi Park, Norwell, Massachusetts 02061 Printed on acid-free paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Clean &Unclean Meats
    Clean & Unclean Meats God expects all who desire to have a relationship with Him to live holy lives (Exodus 19:6; 1 Peter 1:15). The Bible says following God’s instructions regarding the meat we eat is one aspect of living a holy life (Leviticus 11:44-47). Modern research indicates that there are health benets to eating only the meat of animals approved by God and avoiding those He labels as unclean. Here is a summation of the clean (acceptable to eat) and unclean (not acceptable to eat) animals found in Leviticus 11 and Deuteronomy 14. For further explanation, see the LifeHopeandTruth.com article “Clean and Unclean Animals.” BIRDS CLEAN (Eggs of these birds are also clean) Chicken Prairie chicken Dove Ptarmigan Duck Quail Goose Sage grouse (sagehen) Grouse Sparrow (and all other Guinea fowl songbirds; but not those of Partridge the corvid family) Peafowl (peacock) Swan (the KJV translation of “swan” is a mistranslation) Pheasant Teal Pigeon Turkey BIRDS UNCLEAN Leviticus 11:13-19 (Eggs of these birds are also unclean) All birds of prey Cormorant (raptors) including: Crane Buzzard Crow (and all Condor other corvids) Eagle Cuckoo Ostrich Falcon Egret Parrot Kite Flamingo Pelican Hawk Glede Penguin Osprey Grosbeak Plover Owl Gull Raven Vulture Heron Roadrunner Lapwing Stork Other birds including: Loon Swallow Albatross Magpie Swi Bat Martin Water hen Bittern Ossifrage Woodpecker ANIMALS CLEAN Leviticus 11:3; Deuteronomy 14:4-6 (Milk from these animals is also clean) Addax Hart Antelope Hartebeest Beef (meat of domestic cattle) Hirola chews
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Tahoe Fish Species
    Description: o The Lohonton cutfhroot trout (LCT) is o member of the Solmonidqe {trout ond solmon) fomily, ond is thought to be omong the most endongered western solmonids. o The Lohonton cufihroot wos listed os endongered in 1970 ond reclossified os threotened in 1975. Dork olive bdcks ond reddish to yellow sides frequently chorocterize the LCT found in streoms. Steom dwellers reoch l0 inches in length ond only weigh obout I lb. Their life spon is less thon 5 yeors. ln streoms they ore opportunistic feeders, with diets consisting of drift orgonisms, typicolly terrestriol ond oquotic insects. The sides of loke-dwelling LCT ore often silvery. A brood, pinkish stripe moy be present. Historicolly loke dwellers reoched up to 50 inches in length ond weigh up to 40 pounds. Their life spon is 5-14yeors. ln lokes, smoll Lohontons feed on insects ond zooplonkton while lorger Lohonions feed on other fish. Body spots ore the diognostic chorocter thot distinguishes the Lohonion subspecies from the .l00 Poiute cutthroot. LCT typicolly hove 50 to or more lorge, roundish-block spots thot cover their entire bodies ond their bodies ore typicolly elongoted. o Like other cufihroot trout, they hove bosibronchiol teeth (on the bose of tongue), ond red sloshes under their iow (hence the nome "cutthroot"). o Femole sexuol moturity is reoch between oges of 3 ond 4, while moles moture ot 2 or 3 yeors of oge. o Generolly, they occur in cool flowing woier with ovoiloble cover of well-vegetoted ond stoble streom bonks, in oreos where there ore streom velocity breoks, ond in relotively silt free, rocky riffle-run oreos.
    [Show full text]
  • Provision of Information on Place of Product Origin to Consumers
    Fishery Provision of Information on Place of Product Origin to Products Consumers ○Since October 2011, it has been recommended to display places of origin of fresh fishery products, mainly those caught on the Pacific side of eastern Japan, by dividing the sea areas into 7 zones and clarifying these zone names. Zones for migratory fish Display example [Migratory fish species] Salmon shark, blue shark, shortfin mako shark, sardines, salmon and trout, Pacific saury, Japanese amberjack, Japanese Indicate the water zone jack mackerel, marlins, mackerels, bonito and tunas, Japanese of catch on a label flying squid, spear squid, and neon flying squid Line of 200 nautical miles off the coast of Honshu (i) Pacific Ocean off the coast of Due east line extending from Hokkaido and Aomori the border between Aomori and Iwate Prefectures (ii) Off the coast of Sanriku Due east line extending from (northern part) the border between Iwate and Miyagi Prefectures (iii) Off the coast of Sanriku Due east line extending from (southern part) the border between Miyagi and Indicate the water zone (iv) Off the coast of Fukushima Prefectures of catch on a label Fukushima Due east line extending from Fishery Products 8.6 (v) Off the coast of the border between Fukushima Hitachi and Kashima and Ibaraki Prefectures (vi) Off the coast of Boso Due east line extending from the border between Ibaraki and Due east line Chiba Prefectures extending to the east from Nojimazaki, Chiba Prepared based on the "Responses at Farmland" by the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF) MAFF Since October 2011, the national government has been encouraging producers to display places of origin of fresh fishery products, mainly those caught on the Pacific side of eastern Japan so that consumers can easily understand where the relevant fishery product was caught.
    [Show full text]
  • Muscle Strain in Swimming Milkfish
    The Journal of Experimental Biology 202, 529–541 (1999) 529 Printed in Great Britain © The Company of Biologists Limited 1999 JEB1633 MUSCLE STRAIN HISTORIES IN SWIMMING MILKFISH IN STEADY AND SPRINTING GAITS STEPHEN L. KATZ*, ROBERT E. SHADWICK AND H. SCOTT RAPOPORT Center for Marine Biotechnology and Biomedicine and Marine Biology Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA 92093-0204, USA *Present address and address for correspondence: Zoology Department, Duke University, PO Box 90325, Durham, NC 27708-0325, USA (e-mail: [email protected]) Accepted 10 December 1998; published on WWW 3 February 1999 Summary Adult milkfish (Chanos chanos) swam in a water-tunnel over that speed range, while tail-beat frequency increased flume over a wide range of speeds. Fish were instrumented by 140 %. While using a sprinting gait, muscle strains with sonomicrometers to measure shortening of red and became bimodal, with strains within bursts being white myotomal muscle. Muscle strain was also calculated approximately double those between bursts. Muscle strain from simultaneous overhead views of the swimming fish. calculated from local body bending for a range of locations This allowed us to test the hypothesis that the muscle on the body indicated that muscle strain increases rostrally shortens in phase with local body bending. The fish swam to caudally, but only by less than 4 %. These results suggest at slow speeds [U<2.6 fork lengths s−1 (=FL s−1)] where only that swimming muscle, which forms a large fraction of the peripheral red muscle was powering body movements, and body volume in a fish, undergoes a history of strain that is also at higher speeds (2.6>U>4.6 FL s−1) where they similar to that expected for a homogeneous, continuous adopted a sprinting gait in which the white muscle is beam.
    [Show full text]
  • 07 Trites FB105(2)
    Diets of Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus) in Southeast Alaska, 1993−1999 Item Type article Authors Trites, Andrew W.; Calkins, Donald G.; Winship, Arliss J. Download date 29/09/2021 03:04:20 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/25538 ART & EQ UATIONS ARE LINKED 234 Abstract—The diet of Steller sea lions Diets of Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus) (Eumetopias jubatus) was determined from 1494 scats (feces) collected at in Southeast Alaska, 1993−1999 breeding (rookeries) and nonbreeding (haulout) sites in Southeast Alaska from 1993 to 1999. The most common Andrew W. Trites1 prey of 61 species identified were wall- Donald G. Calkins2 eye pollock ( ), Theragra chalcogramma 1 Pacific herring (Clupea pallasii), Arliss J. Winship Pacific sand lance (Ammodytes hexa- Email address for A. W. Trites: [email protected] pterus), Pacific salmon (Salmonidae), 1 Marine Mammal Research Unit, Fisheries Centre arrowtooth flounder (Atheresthes sto- Room 247, AERL – Aquatic Ecosystems Research Laboratory mias), rockfish (Sebastes spp.), skates 2202 Main Mall, University of British Columbia (Rajidae), and cephalopods (squid Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4 and octopus). Steller sea lion diets at the three Southeast Alaska rook- 2 Alaska Department of Fish and Game eries differed significantly from one 333 Raspberry Road another. The sea lions consumed the Anchorage, Alaska 99518-1599 most diverse range of prey catego- ries during summer, and the least diverse during fall. Diet was more diverse in Southeast Alaska during the 1990s than in any other region of Alaska (Gulf of Alaska and Aleutian Islands). Dietary differences between increasing and declining populations Steller sea lion (Eumetopias jubatus) rates of decline had the lowest diversi- of Steller sea lions in Alaska correlate populations in the Aleutian Islands ties of diet.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S
    Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4—An Update April 2013 Prepared by: Pam L. Fuller, Amy J. Benson, and Matthew J. Cannister U.S. Geological Survey Southeast Ecological Science Center Gainesville, Florida Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia Cover Photos: Silver Carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix – Auburn University Giant Applesnail, Pomacea maculata – David Knott Straightedge Crayfish, Procambarus hayi – U.S. Forest Service i Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ vi INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of Region 4 Introductions Since 2000 ....................................................................................... 1 Format of Species Accounts ...................................................................................................................... 2 Explanation of Maps ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Inland Fishes of California
    Inland Fishes of California Revise d and Expanded PETER B. MO YL E Illustrations by Chris Ma ri van Dyck and Joe Tome ller i NIVERS ITyor ALfFORNJA PRESS Ikrkd cr I.", ..\ n~d e ' Lon don Universit }, 0 Ca lifornia Press Herkdey and Los Angeles, Ca lifornia Uni ve rsity of alifornia Press, Ltd. Lundun, England ~ 2002 by the Regents of the Unive rsi ty of Ca lifornia Library of Cungress ataloging-in -Publ ica tion Data j\·[oyk, Pen: r B. Inland fis hes of California / Peter B. Moyle ; illustrations by Chris Mari van D)'ck and Joe Tomell eri.- Rev. and expanded. p. cm. In lu de> bibl iographical refe rences (p. ). ISBN 0- 20-2.2754 -'1 (cl ot h: alk. papa) I. rreshw:ltcr lishes-Cali(ornia. I. Title. QL62S C2 M6H 2002 597 .17/i'097Q4-dc21 20010 27680 1\!UlIl.Ifaclu rcd in Canacla II 10 Q9 00 07 06 0 04 03 02 10 ' 1\ 7 b '; -\ 3 2 1 Th paper u!)ed in thi> public.ltiu(] 111l'd., the minimum requirements "fA SI / i': ISO Z39.4H-1992 (R 199;) ( Pmlllllh'/l e ofPa pcr) . e Special Thanks The illustrations for this book were made possible by gra nts from the following : California-Nevada Chapter, American Fi she ries Soc iety Western Di vision, Am erican Fi she ries Society California Department of Fish and Game Giles W. and El ise G. Mead Foundation We appreciate the generous funding support toward the publication of this book by the United Sta tes Environme ntal Protection Agency, Region IX, San Francisco Contents Pre(acc ix Salmon and Trout, Salmonidae 242 Ackl10 11'ledgl11 el1ts Xlll Silversides, Atherinopsidae 307 COlll'er,<iol1 ['actors xv
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Superior Food Web MENT of C
    ATMOSPH ND ER A I C C I A N D A M E I C N O I S L T A R N A T O I I O T N A N U E .S C .D R E E PA M RT OM Lake Superior Food Web MENT OF C Sea Lamprey Walleye Burbot Lake Trout Chinook Salmon Brook Trout Rainbow Trout Lake Whitefish Bloater Yellow Perch Lake herring Rainbow Smelt Deepwater Sculpin Kiyi Ruffe Lake Sturgeon Mayfly nymphs Opossum Shrimp Raptorial waterflea Mollusks Amphipods Invasive waterflea Chironomids Zebra/Quagga mussels Native waterflea Calanoids Cyclopoids Diatoms Green algae Blue-green algae Flagellates Rotifers Foodweb based on “Impact of exotic invertebrate invaders on food web structure and function in the Great Lakes: NOAA, Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, 4840 S. State Road, Ann Arbor, MI A network analysis approach” by Mason, Krause, and Ulanowicz, 2002 - Modifications for Lake Superior, 2009. 734-741-2235 - www.glerl.noaa.gov Lake Superior Food Web Sea Lamprey Macroinvertebrates Sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus). An aggressive, non-native parasite that Chironomids/Oligochaetes. Larval insects and worms that live on the lake fastens onto its prey and rasps out a hole with its rough tongue. bottom. Feed on detritus. Species present are a good indicator of water quality. Piscivores (Fish Eaters) Amphipods (Diporeia). The most common species of amphipod found in fish diets that began declining in the late 1990’s. Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Pacific salmon species stocked as a trophy fish and to control alewife. Opossum shrimp (Mysis relicta). An omnivore that feeds on algae and small cladocerans.
    [Show full text]
  • Should I Eat the Fish I Catch?
    EPA 823-F-14-002 For More Information October 2014 Introduction What can I do to reduce my health risks from eating fish containing chemical For more information about reducing your Fish are an important part of a healthy diet. pollutants? health risks from eating fish that contain chemi- Office of Science and Technology (4305T) They are a lean, low-calorie source of protein. cal pollutants, contact your local or state health Some sport fish caught in the nation’s lakes, Following these steps can reduce your health or environmental protection department. You rivers, oceans, and estuaries, however, may risks from eating fish containing chemical can find links to state fish advisory programs Should I Eat the contain chemicals that could pose health risks if pollutants. The rest of the brochure explains and your state’s fish advisory program contact these fish are eaten in large amounts. these recommendations in more detail. on the National Fish Advisory Program website Fish I Catch? at: http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/fish- The purpose of this brochure is not to 1. Look for warning signs or call your shellfish/fishadvisories/index.cfm. discourage you from eating fish. It is intended local or state environmental health as a guide to help you select and prepare fish department. Contact them before you You may also contact: that are low in chemical pollutants. By following fish to see if any advisories are posted in these recommendations, you and your family areas where you want to fish. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency can continue to enjoy the benefits of eating fish.
    [Show full text]