PACIFIC WORLD Journal of the Institute of Buddhist Studies
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
PACIFIC WORLD Journal of the Institute of Buddhist Studies Third Series Number 13 Fall 2011 SPECIAL SECTION: Recent Research on Esoteric Buddhism TITLE iii Pacific World is an annual journal in English devoted to the dissemination of his- torical, textual, critical, and interpretive articles on Buddhism generally and Shinshu Buddhism particularly to both academic and lay readerships. The journal is distributed free of charge. Articles for consideration by the Pacific World are welcomed and are to be submitted in English and addressed to the Editor, Pacific World, 2140 Durant Ave., Berkeley, CA 94704-1589, USA. Acknowledgment: This annual publication is made possible by the donation of BDK America of Berkeley, California. Guidelines for Authors: Manuscripts (approximately twenty standard pages) should be typed double-spaced with 1-inch margins. Notes are to be endnotes with full biblio- graphic information in the note first mentioning a work, i.e., no separate bibliography. See The Chicago Manual of Style (16th edition), University of Chicago Press, §16.3 ff. Authors are responsible for the accuracy of all quotations and for supplying complete references. Please e-mail electronic version in both formatted and plain text, if possible. Manuscripts should be submitted by February 1st. Foreign words should be underlined and marked with proper diacriticals, except for the following: bodhisattva, buddha/Buddha, karma, nirvana, samsara, sangha, yoga. Romanized Chinese follows Pinyin system (except in special cases); romanized Japanese, the modified Hepburn system. Japanese/Chinese names are given surname first, omit- ting honorifics. Ideographs preferably should be restricted to notes. Editorial Committee reserves the right to standardize use of or omit diacriticals. Conventionalized English form of sutra title may be used if initially identified in original or full form in text or note. Editorial Committee reserves the right to edit all submis- sions. Upon request, page proofs may be reviewed by the author. Include institutional affiliation and position, or present status/occupation and place. All manuscripts submitted for publication become the property of Pacific World. By agreeing to publication in the Pacific World, authors give the journal and the In- stitute of Buddhist Studies an unlimited license to publish and reprint the essay. This license includes, but is not limited to, any media format (hard copy, electronic, etc.), and international rights. Copyright remains the author’s. EDITORIAL COMMITTEE Richard K. Payne, Chair David Matsumoto Eisho Nasu Natalie Quli Scott Mitchell ASSISTANT EDITOR Natalie Quli BOOK REvIEW EDITOR Scott Mitchell REVERSE TITLE PAGE iv PACIFIC WORLD Journal of the Institute of Buddhist Studies Third Series, Number 13 Fall 2011 CONTENTS Forest as Challenge, Forest as Healer: Reinterpretations and Hybridity within the Forest Tradition of Thailand BROOKE SCHEDNECK 1 Awakening Faith in the Pure Land Section of the Qixinlun CHRISTOPHER CALLAHAN 25 Monastic Lineages and Ritual Participation: A Proposed Revision of KURODA Toshio’s Kenmitsu Taisei MIKAËL BAUER 45 Selected Materials for the Study of the Life of Buddha Śākyamuni CHARLES WILLEMEN 67 SPECIAL SECTION: RECENT RESEARCH ON ESOTERIC BUDDHISM The Purification of Heruka: Reflections on Identity Formation in Late Indian Buddhism DAVID B. GRAY 81 A Brief Exploration of Late Indian Buddhist Exegeses of the “Mantrayāna” and “Mantranaya” VESNA A. WALLACE 95 On the Subject of Abhiṣeka CHARLES D. ORZECH 113 The Life of the Tang Court Monk Vajrabodhi as Chronicled by Lü Xiang (呂向): South Indian and Śrī Laṅkān Antecedents to the Arrival of the Buddhist vajrayāna in Eighth-Century Java and China JEFFREY SUNDBERG, IN COLLABORATION WITH ROLF GIEBEL 129 v Ritual Studies in the Longue Durée: Comparing Shingon and Śaiva Siddhānta Homas RICHARD K. PAYNE 223 BOOK REVIEWS Emptiness and Temporality: Buddhism and Medieval Japanese Poetics by Esperanza Ramirez-Christensen STEFFEN DÖLL 263 Yongming Yanshou’s Conception of Chan in the Zongjing lu by Albert Welter COURTNEY BRUNTZ 272 Virtual Orientalism: Asian Religions and American Popular Culture by Jane Naomi Iwamura KENDALL MARCHMAN 277 BDK English TripiṭaKa sEriEs 285 vi Forest as Challenge, Forest as Healer: Reinterpretations and Hybridity within the Forest Tradition of Thailand Brooke Schedneck PhD Candidate, Arizona State University The forest has held an ambiguous and ambivalent place in Buddhist history. It is featured prominently in major moments of the Buddha’s life story as the place of his birth, enlightenment, and death. It is also perceived as a place of fear, resistance, escape, sickness, spirits, danger, and temptation. In contrast to these negative attributes, the forest has been described as a place to encounter nature free from distractions; it embodies solitude, peace, and tranquility. How can one resolve these differing notions? Why does this ambivalence exist? How have all of these meanings changed over time? This essay looks at the rhetoric of the forest in Buddhist thought by tracing the ambivalent attitudes of the forest within the Pāli canon, to meanings of the forest as described in popular Thai forest biographies, and finally to contemporary Buddhist writings, both from Thailand and Western countries. The Pāli canon suggests the best place to prac- tice is the natural world; it is isolating and challenging at first but soon can help transform the mind. The forest tradition of Thailand depicts the forest as more than just isolating, but rather dangerous and fearful. In contemporary times there is hardly any trace of the forest as a fear- ful place because it is instead depicted as sacred, and there is a feeling of merging with the natural world that aids awakening. In his recent book, The Making of Buddhist Modernism, David McMahan points to a change in the meaning of the forest as Buddhism developed. He states that the reverence for nature is not apparent in the Pāli canon, which he finds ambivalent toward the wilderness. There is no appreciation of nature for nature’s sake, no sense that nature is sacred.1 This paper shows how this change, from ambivalence toward nature to nature as sacred, occurred within the forest tradition of Thailand. 1 2 Pacific World The change seen in these conceptions of the forest can be ex- plained by cultural and religious hybridities. Hybridities studies ex- plore the global context in terms of flows of ideas, people, and econo- mies through all forms of media. Marwan Kraidy in her book uses case studies of hybrid cultures to show the wide applicability of hybridi- ties.2 Kraidy finds that hybridity in modern times is not homogenizing but also does not produce complete heterogeneity. In the forest tradi- tion this kind of hybrid formation is apparent where there is a mixing of ideas of the forest as challenging and also peaceful. Both of these ideas are established in the Pāli canon, as this article details, but find more overt expressions when connected with other social discourses. I use hybridity in this broad sense in order to capture the spectrum of mixing that occurs over time during different moments of encounter and exchange. McMahan also uses hybridity to describe Buddhism in North America. He argues that this consists of a hybrid of indigenous Buddhist concepts with discourses of psychology, Romanticism, and science. The result is something neither dominated by Buddhist ideas nor by dis- courses of modernity. Indigenous Buddhist concepts, appropriated in a modern context, reveal a hybrid process drawing on Western ideas and concepts.3 Within the modern-day forest tradition of Thailand modern romanticist ideas of nature are mixed with early Buddhist conceptions that advocate practice in the forest. I conceive of the modern transfor- mation of the forest as a hybrid, bringing together the ambivalence of the early tradition with discourses of modernity. This paper presents how particular manifestations of modernity have created a hybrid un- derstanding of the forest in the Buddhist tradition. FOREST MONK, VILLAGE MONK In early Theravāda Buddhist history there emerged a distinction between monks who practiced in the forest and those who settled in villages and towns. Reginald Ray labels the Buddha and his earliest dis- ciples as saints of the forest and uses their significance to argue that forest renunciants should be represented in a separate category within Buddhist studies, alongside settled monastics and laity. Ray argues that forest renunciants were the earliest paradigm for normative Buddhism, and the only paradigm before the tradition became institutionalized.4 After monasteries became established near villages, the paradigm of town monk emerged. As an ideal type, the forest dweller corresponds Schedneck: Forest as Challenge, Forest as Healer 3 to the vocation of meditation and the village dweller to study of the Buddhist teachings and interaction with the laity. Taylor writes of the history of the forest tradition and how after meeting his teacher, Ajahn Man, Ajahn Mahā Boowa (var. Mahabua) “turned away from scholastic or book pursuits (kanthathura) to kammathaan [practices of the forest monk] practices. This narration of ‘turning away’ from scholastic worldly pursuits is symbolically important in the charisma building of a forest monk.”5 However, these two vocations are not mutually ex- clusive since forest monks may study and village monks may practice meditation and monastics can move between these two roles. Indeed, in response to Ray’s