Analyzing the Technical Barriers to Realizing the Hyperloop

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Analyzing the Technical Barriers to Realizing the Hyperloop Christopher Robinson Lead Analyst: Senior Analyst Chad Goldberg Contributor: Research Associate Image Credit: SpaceX and Tesla Hyperloop patent filings 60 Executive Summary 50 40 An open-source white paper from Tesla and SpaceX Utility 30 engineers spurred interest in vacuum train technologies, Granted while the lure of a low-carbon long-range transit 20 Applied technology has further increased interest. In the full 10 report, we analyze the largest technical barriers Hyperloop 0 faces and identify key innovators in each area using patent 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 data and primary research, finding: • Hyperloop doesn’t need a fundamental technology Hyperloop patent filings breakthrough to be commercialized, and project 60 economics will be the biggest barrier to System and 50 commercialization. station 40 Pillar and tube • High-speed test tracks will be the most important 30 indicator of progress to watch, specifically ones that 20 Propulsion and enable higher speeds. 10 levitation Pod • A commercial passenger-carrying Hyperloop route is 0 unlikely to be built before 2040 and will need 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 considerable government support. 2 Client confidential. Not for redistribution. Since the industrial revolution, four primary modes of transit have emerged to move people and things around the world Rail Aviation Currently the fastest mode of transportation on land still Emerged at the dawn of the 20th century and was crucial in widely used for moving both people and goods, but with rapidly expanding access to long-distance travel little route flexibility Roads Marine Essential to modern travel, road networks allow vehicles to Used primarily to move goods rather than people; one of navigate the “last mile” for other modes with less route the first modes invented and enabled early intercontinental flexibility travel 3 Client confidential. Not for redistribution. All modes are facing a new challenge: decarbonization Innovations within each mode of transport continue to focus on a Eviation’s Alice electric aircraft is slated for release combination of faster transit, lower costs, and greater passenger comfort. in 2022 with a range of 750 miles – longer than Growing recognition of the emissions impact mobility has on climate any competitor, but still well short of many change is now posing a new challenge: How can transit be decarbonized? aviation routes. According to the IEA, transportation accounts for 24% of direct CO2 emissions from combustion. Advancements in affordable renewable power generation, electric motors, and battery technology have made decarbonizing personal vehicles feasible through a combination of hybrid and electric vehicles. Similarly, a push for electrifying or possibly adopting hydrogen fuel cells in rail technologies is possible. Electrifying air and marine technologies is significantly more challenging, as the range and energy density requirements are still outside of what battery technologies can provide. This challenge is forcing many to think of alternative strategies to decarbonize long-range transit. Image credit: Eviation 4 Client confidential. Not for redistribution. Global Hyperloop Startup Ecosystem 5 Client confidential. Not for redistribution. Propulsion and levitation: Systems that provide propulsion and support to the vehicles Pod design: Vehicles designed to operate in Hyperloop systems System and station Pillar and tube design: design: The operation of Hyperloop The enclosure that systems and design of maintains a vacuum stations to load and unload and guides the passengers or cargo vehicle 6 Image Credit: Hardt Hyperloop Client confidential. Not for redistribution. Using patent trends to understand innovation hot spots and key players in Hyperloop development In the years following the 2013 white paper, patent Hyperloop patent filings filings increased in technologies related to Hyperloop as 60 startups, student teams, and independent inventors all filed IP on the topic. Using Lux’s patent tools, a global 40 Utility search for patents that mentioned either “Hyperloop” or “vacuum train” was completed. We segmented patent 20 Granted filings according to the subsystems on the slide below as Applied well as categorizing them as “direct” or “indirect” in 0 terms of how they relate to Hyperloop. 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 • Direct: These patents cover innovations that are directly related to Hyperloop, with little or no value to Hyperloop patent filings other technologies. 60 • Indirect: These patents cover innovations that could 50 be applied to Hyperloop technologies but are written 40 System and station so as to be relevant to other modes of transit or 30 Pillar and tube industries. 20 Propulsion and levitation 10 Pod 0 7 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Client confidential. Not for redistribution. SUBSYSTEM: PILLAR AND TUBE DESIGN Tubes in a partial vacuum enable the high speeds of Hyperloop, but also require the most innovation Technical challenges Leading Patent Filers • Minimizing leakage: Tube design is the crucial element that allows HYPERLOOP TECH INC* the train to operate in a low-pressure environment to achieve higher speeds. In a perfectly sealed system, pumps would only be required ZHANG YUE to pump down to a given pressure once. However, leakage is HYPERLOOP TRANSP TECHNOLOGIES INC inevitable, and periodic operation of pumps will also be needed to TATA STEEL NEDERLAND Publications maintain that vacuum. TECH B V Families • Minimizing costs: Pylons are the most commonly pursued tube ELECTRICWAZE LLC support design, as they allow the tube to move independent of the supports and are more resilient to earthquakes or expansion due to 0 5 10 temperatures changes. Aboveground construction is a lower-cost Hyperloop Relevance solution. Key Players Indirect 18% • HTT and VHO both pursue a strategy of ensuring all their IP is protected globally, resulting in many patents but on a limited number of families. Direct • Most companies, including leading tube IP filers Tata Steel and VHO, 82% are focused on higher-cost steel tubes. EuroTube focuses on lower- 8 cost concrete solutions that require additional sealants. * Hyperloop Tech is the former Client confidential. Not for redistribution. name of Virgin Hyperloop One SUBSYSTEM: PILLAR AND TUBE DESIGN Selection of Hyperloop tube pressure is the most important design choice impacting system costs Hyperloop projects will be optimized to minimize costs, and selecting Energy and tube designs are heavily related to the optimal pressure to operate under is crucial, as it impacts both the choice of pressure in a Hyperloop system, as operational costs (via energy consumption) and capital costs (via shown in NASA’s theoretical analysis below. tube design and construction). • Energy consumption from maintaining a vacuum is not well- understood currently due to a lack of operational data. In theory, the whole system needs to be pumped down only a single time, but in practice, inevitable leakages in the system will require additional energy to maintain a vacuum. • Energy consumption from propulsion increases linearly with pressure, as more energy is required to overcome drag at higher pressures. Most Hyperloop developers Lux interviewed focused on the range of 50 Pa to 250 Pa; higher pressures will likely see energy costs associated with propulsion increase, while below this range, the energy required to maintain vacuum dominates. The optimal system pressure will vary for each specific Hyperloop line. Source: “Conceptual Feasibility Study of the 9 Hyperloop Vehicle for Next-Generation Transport” Client confidential. Not for redistribution. Outlook Is Hyperloop technically feasible? Building a Hyperloop system today does not require any fundamental technical breakthroughs, but it will require extensive engineering and design efforts. The basic design of an oversized tube to avoid the need for a pod-mounted compressor and adapting maglev technologies for levitation and propulsion is feasible today. No companies have tested Hyperloop at the proposed speeds exceeding 750 mph, primarily due to a lack of large-enough testing tracks, and more challenges are likely to emerge as top speeds increase. Will Hyperloop be cost-effective? The issue of high costs is the most likely reason Hyperloop will fail. It is currently unclear how expensive Hyperloop will be, as early estimates were far too low and current project proposals are still increasing in average cost per mile, but it will come at a cost premium compared to high-speed rail. Cost per mile will also be geography- and project-specific, making a general cost-per-mile estimate of Hyperloop challenging to make. Based on this analysis, we expect the first passenger-carrying high-speed Hyperloop projects to begin operation by 2040 at the earliest. 10 Client confidential. Not for redistribution. Outlook Based on this analysis, we expect the first passenger-carrying high-speed Hyperloop projects to begin operation by 2040 at the earliest. We advise clients to watch for two key milestones that indicate Hyperloop is making progress toward commercialization: • Test tracks: This is the single most important milestone in advancing Hyperloop toward commercialization. Today’s test tracks are not able to test full-size Hyperloop systems at high speeds. Some tracks are too short and limit the maximum speed achievable, and others are smaller-diameter than would be needed for passenger-carrying systems. A test track long enough to allow pods to reach
Recommended publications
  • Hyperloop One Rob Ferber Chief Engineer

    Hyperloop One Rob Ferber Chief Engineer

    Hyperloop One Rob Ferber Chief Engineer U.S. Department of Transportation 2017 FRA Rail Program Delivery Meeting Federal Railroad Administration 2 Hyperloop Technology Origin and Explanation U.S. Department of Transportation 2017 FRA Rail Program Delivery Meeting Federal Railroad Administration U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Railroad Administration PASSENGER | CARGO VEHICLE LOW- PRESSURE TUBE ELECTRO- MAGNETIC PROPULSION MAGNETIC LEVITATION AUTONOMOUS CONTROL PLATFORM U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Railroad Administration 5 … And Then We Made It Real Test Facility in Nevada U.S. Department of Transportation 2017 FRA Rail Program Delivery Meeting Federal Railroad Administration We’re building a radically efficient mass transport system DevLoop NORTH LAS VEGAS, NEVADA World’s Only Full- System Hyperloop Test Facility U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Railroad Administration XP-1 NORTH LAS VEGAS, NEVADA First Hyperloop One vehicle U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Railroad Administration Kitty Hawk Moment MAY 12, 2017 5.3 seconds 98 feet 69 mph | 111 km/h System Features Direct On-Demand Intermodal Comfortable Every journey is non-stop, Autonomous Frequent pod Smooth as an elevator, intelligently routes passengers operations eliminates departures, connects acceleration and need for schedules to other modes deceleration similar to a and cargo pods quickly to commercial jet destination U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Railroad Administration Board & Disembark Anywhere, All Journeys Non-Stop VAIL Distribution Center GREELEY Hyperloop One –19m FORT COLLINS DENVER PUEBLO DENVER COLORADO INTL SPRINGS AIRPORT U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Railroad Administration 12 Colorado Project Colorado DOT/Hyperloop One Feasibility Study U.S. Department of Transportation 2017 FRA Rail Program Delivery Meeting Federal Railroad Administration 13 • Concept proposed by AECOM in partnership with CDOT, City of Denver, Denver International Airport and the City of Greeley.
  • Hyperloop Texas: Proposal to Hyperloop One Global Challenge SWTA 2017 History of Hyperloop

    Hyperloop Texas: Proposal to Hyperloop One Global Challenge SWTA 2017 History of Hyperloop

    Hyperloop Texas: Proposal to Hyperloop One Global Challenge SWTA 2017 History of Hyperloop Hyperloop Texas What is Hyperloop • New mode of transportation consisting of moving passenger or cargo vehicles through a near-vacuum tube using electric propulsion • Autonomous pod levitates above the track and glides at 700 mph+ over long distances Passenger pod Cargo pod Hyperloop Texas History of Hyperloop Hyperloop Texas How does it work? Hyperloop Texas How does it work? Hyperloop Texas History of Hyperloop Hamad Port Doha, Qatar Hyperloop Texas Hyperloop One Global Challenge • Contest to identify and select • 2,600+ registrants from more • Hyperloop TX proposal is a locations around the world with than 100 countries semi-finalist in the Global the potential to develop and • AECOM is a partner with Challenge, one of 35 selected construct the world’s first Hyperloop One, building test from 2,600 around the world Hyperloop networks track in Las Vegas and studying connection to Port of LA Hyperloop Texas Hyperloop SpaceX Pod Competition Hyperloop Texas QUESTION: What happens when a megaregion with five of the eight fastest growing cities in the US operates as ONE? WHAT IS THE TEXAS TRIANGLE? THE TEXAS TRIANGLE MEGAREGION. DALLAS Texas Triangle DALLAS comparable FORT FORT WORTH to Georgia in area WORTH AUSTIN SAN ANTONIO HOUSTON LAREDO AUSTIN SAN ANTONIO HOUSTON LAREDO TRIANGLE HYPERLOOP The Texas Triangle HYPERLOOP FREIGHT Hyperloop Corridor The proposed 640-mile route connects the cities of Dallas, Austin, San Antonio, and Houston with Laredo
  • Missouri Blue Ribbon Panel on Hyperloop

    Missouri Blue Ribbon Panel on Hyperloop

    Chairman Lt. Governor Mike Kehoe Vice Chairman Andrew G. Smith Panelists Jeff Aboussie Cathy Bennett Tom Blair Travis Brown Mun Choi Tom Dempsey Rob Dixon Warren Erdman Rep. Travis Fitzwater Michael X. Gallagher Rep. Derek Grier Chris Gutierrez Rhonda Hamm-Niebruegge Mike Lally Mary Lamie Elizabeth Loboa Sen. Tony Luetkemeyer MISSOURI BLUE RIBBON Patrick McKenna Dan Mehan Joe Reagan Clint Robinson PANEL ON HYPERLOOP Sen. Caleb Rowden Greg Steinhoff Report prepared for The Honorable Elijah Haahr Tariq Taherbhai Leonard Toenjes Speaker of the Missouri House of Representatives Bill Turpin Austin Walker Ryan Weber Sen. Brian Williams Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 5 A National Certification Track in Missouri .................................................................................................... 8 Track Specifications ................................................................................................................................. 10 SECTION 1: International Tube Transport Center of Excellence (ITTCE) ................................................... 12 Center Objectives ................................................................................................................................ 12 Research Areas ...................................................................................................................................
  • Effect of Hyperloop Technologies on the Electric Grid and Transportation Energy

    Effect of Hyperloop Technologies on the Electric Grid and Transportation Energy

    Effect of Hyperloop Technologies on the Electric Grid and Transportation Energy January 2021 United States Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 Department of Energy |January 2021 Disclaimer This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof. Department of Energy |January 2021 [ This page is intentionally left blank] Effect of Hyperloop Technologies on Electric Grid and Transportation Energy | Page i Department of Energy |January 2021 Executive Summary Hyperloop technology, initially proposed in 2013 as an innovative means for intermediate- range or intercity travel, is now being developed by several companies. Proponents point to potential benefits for both passenger travel and freight transport, including time-savings, convenience, quality of service and, in some cases, increased energy efficiency. Because the system is powered by electricity, its interface with the grid may require strategies that include energy storage. The added infrastructure, in some cases, may present opportunities for grid- wide system benefits from integrating hyperloop systems with variable energy resources.
  • SPEEDLINES, HSIPR Committee, Issue

    SPEEDLINES, HSIPR Committee, Issue

    High-Speed Intercity Passenger Rail SPEEDLINES JULY 2017 ISSUE #21 2 CONTENTS SPEEDLINES MAGAZINE 3 HSIPR COMMITTEE CHAIR LETTER 5 APTA’S HS&IPR ROI STUDY Planes, trains, and automobiles may have carried us through the 7 VIRGINIA VIEW 20th century, but these days, the future buzz is magnetic levitation, autonomous vehicles, skytran, jet- 10 AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES packs, and zip lines that fit in a backpack. 15 MAGLEV » p.15 18 HYPERLOOP On the front cover: Futuristic visions of transport systems are unlikely to 20 SPOTLIGHT solve our current challenges, it’s always good to dream. Technology promises cleaner transportation systems for busy metropolitan cities where residents don’t have 21 CASCADE CORRIDOR much time to spend in traffic jams. 23 USDOT FUNDING TO CALTRAINS CHAIR: ANNA BARRY VICE CHAIR: AL ENGEL SECRETARY: JENNIFER BERGENER OFFICER AT LARGE: DAVID CAMERON 25 APTA’S 2017 HSIPR CONFERENCE IMMEDIATE PAST CHAIR: PETER GERTLER EDITOR: WENDY WENNER PUBLISHER: AL ENGEL 29 LEGISLATIVE OUTLOOK ASSOCIATE PUBLISHER: KENNETH SISLAK ASSOCIATE PUBLISHER: ERIC PETERSON LAYOUT DESIGNER: WENDY WENNER 31 NY PENN STATION RENEWAL © 2011-2017 APTA - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SPEEDLINES is published in cooperation with: 32 GATEWAY PROGRAM AMERICAN PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION 1300 I Street NW, Suite 1200 East Washington, DC 20005 35 INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS “The purpose of SPEEDLINES is to keep our members and friends apprised of the high performance passenger rail envi- ronment by covering project and technology developments domestically and globally, along with policy/financing break- throughs. Opinions expressed represent the views of the authors, and do not necessarily represent the views of APTA nor its High-Speed and Intercity Passenger Rail Committee.” 4 Dear HS&IPR Committee & Friends : I am pleased to continue to the newest issue of our Committee publication, the acclaimed SPEEDLINES.
  • Travel in Britain in 2035 Future Scenarios and Their Implications for Technology Innovation

    Travel in Britain in 2035 Future Scenarios and Their Implications for Technology Innovation

    Travel in Britain in 2035 Future scenarios and their implications for technology innovation Charlene Rohr, Liisa Ecola, Johanna Zmud, Fay Dunkerley, James Black, Eleanor Baker For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR1377 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif., and Cambridge, UK R® is a registered trademark. © 2016 Innovate UK RAND Europe is a not-for-profit organisation whose mission is to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the sponsor. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org www.randeurope.org iii Preface RAND Europe, in collaboration with Risk This report describes the main aspects of the Solutions and Dr Johanna Zmud from the study: the identifi cation of key future technologies, Texas A&M Transportation Institute, was the development of the scenarios, and the commissioned by Innovate UK to develop future fi ndings from interviews with experts about what travel scenarios for 2035, considering possible the scenarios may mean for innovation and policy social and economic changes and exploiting priorities. It may be of use to policymakers or key technologies and innovation in ways that researchers who are interested in future travel could reduce congestion. The purpose of this and the infl uence of technology.
  • Transportation

    Transportation

    HIGHWAYS AND ARTERIALS DALLAS REGIONAL CHAMBER REGIONAL DALLAS ACCESS DENTON TRANSPORTATION McKINNEY Dallas-Fort Worth’s vast transportation | infrastructure connects residents and FRISCO ALLEN businesses. The freeway system provides TRANSPORTATION east-west and north-south corridors with easy access to job centers and residential communities. Mass transit LEWISVILLE PLANO options, including the Dallas Area Rapid FLOWER MOUND WYLIE Transit (DART) system, the Fort Worth PHOTO: DFW AIRPORT T, Trinity Railway Express (TRE), and the AIRPORTS GRAPEVINE CARROLTON Denton County Transit Authority’s (DCTA) A RICHARDSON | XXXXXXX Train off er alternatives to cars for getting ROWLETT 8 GARLAND around the region. 5 The region’s robust interstate infrastructure provides easy links along BEDFORD EULESS IRVING the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) corridor, linking Mexico to Canada DALLAS and to East and West Coast destinations, 15 making it an important intermodal center for the distribution of air, rail, and truck 3 FORT WORTH MESQUITE 4 freight. The nation’s two largest railroads, ARLINGTON GRAND Fort Worth–based Burlington Northern 9 PRAIRIE 16 Santa Fe and Union Pacifi c have major 1 operation nodes in the region, off ering business-effi cient access to other key 2 LANCASTER ports and distribution centers across the 7 DESOTO United States and into Mexico. 17 CEDAR 10 14 MANSFIELD Dallas-Fort Worth also is the HILL destination for some of the nation’s most innovative projects. One of them is already 6 substantially on its way to becoming 12 a reality: the Texas bullet train. TEXAS CENTRAL PARTNERS has received federal 18 CARGO PRE-DESIGNATED McKinney National FOREIGN TRADE ZONE approval for a path of travel for a $15 13 Airport 11 “MAGNET SITES” billion high-speed rail project that will Any company may locate on this connect the DFW area with Houston in 90 land and simply activate with minutes.
  • Hyperloop, ¿El Transporte Del Futuro? Comparativa Y Análisis Dinámico

    Hyperloop, ¿El Transporte Del Futuro? Comparativa Y Análisis Dinámico

    HYPERLOOP, ¿EL TRANSPORTE DEL FUTURO? Jorge Martínez García COMPARATIVA Y 29 de junio de 2020 Tutores: ANÁLISIS DINÁMICO María Dolores Gómez Pulido Roberto Revilla Angulo Trabajo Final de Máster ESCUELA TÉCNICA SUPERIOR DE INGENIEROS DE CAMINOS, CANALES Y PUERTOS UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID Máster Universitario en Ingeniería de Caminos, Canales, y Puertos Hyperloop, ¿el transporte del futuro? Comparativa y análisis dinámico Contenido Índice de Tablas ............................................................................................................................. 4 Índice de Figuras ............................................................................................................................ 5 1 Resumen ................................................................................................................................ 7 2 Agradecimientos .................................................................................................................... 8 3 Introducción .......................................................................................................................... 9 4 Estado del arte ..................................................................................................................... 10 4.1 Sistema de propulsión y suspensión ............................................................................ 12 4.2 Velocidad ..................................................................................................................... 15 4.3 Tamaño del
  • Dallas-Fort Worth HIGH-SPEED TRANSPORTATION in THREE INTERCITY CORRIDORS

    Dallas-Fort Worth HIGH-SPEED TRANSPORTATION in THREE INTERCITY CORRIDORS

    HIGH-SPEED TRANSPORTATION IN THREE INTERCITY CORRIDORS Dallas-Fort Worth March 4, 2021 Greater Dallas Planning Council High-Speed System Vision 2 Imagery provide by TxDOT DFW High-Speed Rail Projects DFW High-Speed Transportation Connection Study NCTCOG Fort Worth to Laredo High-Speed Dallas to Houston Transportation Study High-Speed Rail Project NCTCOG Texas Central Railway (TCR) Source: 3 The study area traverses: • Dallas and Tarrant Counties Study Area • Dallas, Irving, Cockrell Hill, Grand Prairie, Arlington, Pantego, Dalworthington Gardens, Hurst, Euless, Bedford, Richland Hills, North Richland Hills, Haltom City, and Fort Worth • Over 230 square miles Trinity Railway Express AT&T Stadium Globe Life Field 31 miles 4 Study Objectives • Evaluate high-speed transportation alternatives (both alignments and technology) to: ▪ Connect Dallas-Fort Worth to other proposed high-performance passenger systems in the state ▪ Enhance and connect the Dallas-Fort Worth regional transportation system • Obtain federal environmental approval of the viable alternative 5 More Travel Choices Creating: • Increased connectivity o High-Speed connections o Local Network connections • More travel options • Less demand on roadways • Travel times can be more reliable • Better air quality 6 Preliminary Project Purpose Connect Downtown Dallas and Downtown Fort Worth with high- speed intercity passenger rail service or an advanced high-speed ground transportation technology • Provide a safe, convenient, efficient, fast, and reliable alternative to existing ground
  • České Vysoké Učení Technické V Praze Fakulta Strojní

    České Vysoké Učení Technické V Praze Fakulta Strojní

    ČESKÉ VYSOKÉ UČENÍ TECHNICKÉ V PRAZE FAKULTA STROJNÍ 12 120 – ÚSTAV AUTOMOBILŮ, SPALOVACÍCH MOTORŮ A KOLEJOVÝCH VOZIDEL BAKALÁŘSKÁ PRÁCE 2017 Nekonvenční kolejové systémy Unconventional railway systems TOMÁŠ PODZIMEK FS ČVUT Bakalářská práce Tomáš Podzimek Ú 12 120 TZSI – BP – 2017 2016/2017 ZADÁNÍ 2 FS ČVUT Bakalářská práce Tomáš Podzimek Ú 12 120 TZSI – BP – 2017 2016/2017 PODĚKOVÁNÍ Touto cestou bych rád poděkovat panu Ing. Janu Kalivodovi, Ph.D. za odborné vedení, cenné připomínky, důležité rady a ochotu při vytváření této bakalářské práce. Mé poděkování také patří všem vyučujícím na Fakultě stojní ČVUT v Praze, kteří mi předávali své zkušenosti a znalosti. Po celou dobu mého studia měli trpělivost s vypracováváním studentských prací, a především mi byli ochotni vysvětlit jakýkoliv problém týkající se výuky. ANOTAČNÍ ZÁZNAM Jméno autora: Tomáš Příjmení autora: Podzimek Název práce: Nekonvenční kolejové systémy Rozsah práce: Stran: 67 Obrázků: 79 Grafů: 6 Příloh: 0 Akademický rok: 2016/2017 Studijní program: B2342 Teoretický základ strojního inženýrství Obor studia: 2301R000 Studijní program je bezoborový Ústav: 12 120 – Ústav automobilů, spalovacích motorů a kolejových vozidel Vedoucí BP: Ing. Jan Kalivoda, Ph.D. Zadavatel tématu: Fakulta Strojní ČVUT v Praze Klíčová slova: Železniční doprava, kolejové systémy, nekonvenční kolejové systémy, vlaky, železnice, tratě Key words: Rail transport, railway systems, unconventional railway systems, trains, railway, tracks 3 FS ČVUT Bakalářská práce Tomáš Podzimek Ú 12 120 TZSI – BP – 2017 2016/2017 ABSTRAKT/ABSTRACT Předmětem bakalářské práce Nekonvenční kolejové systémy je posoudit použitelnost nekonvenčních kolejových systémů v České Republice. Nejdříve je nutné provést rešerši těchto systémů, včetně jejich technických parametrů, aby se mohly rozdělit podle jejich použití.
  • TIMES ARE CHANGING for WOMEN in RAIL SPECIAL MEETING with JENNIFER BÄCHLI the Keystone of Sustainability

    TIMES ARE CHANGING for WOMEN in RAIL SPECIAL MEETING with JENNIFER BÄCHLI the Keystone of Sustainability

    2018 / 2019 PLUS STEVO LOOKING ELECTRIC TO THE SKIES TESTING YOU CAN COUNT ON THE DRONES FOCUS SPECIAL REPORT INCIDENT HYPERLOOP MANAGEMENT SOLUTION FLY BY LAND DEALING WITH THE UNEXPECTED ALMAVIVA EUROSTAR CONNECTING BUSINESS DIFFERENT MODES PREMIER OF TRANSPORTATION ECOSYSTEMS CONSUME IN MODERATION TIMES ARE CHANGING FOR WOMEN IN RAIL SPECIAL MEETING WITH JENNIFER BÄCHLI The keystone of sustainability DVM series • AC and DC voltage from 600 VRMS to 4200 VRMS • Improved accuracy & temperature stability • High partial discharge extinction voltage: 5 kVRMS @ 10 pC • 30% lower profile – 25% less volume – 56% lighter • Low sensitivity to magnetic fields • Unmatched performance for common mode operation • ± 50mA, ± 10V or 4 to 20 mA outputs • Developed according to IRIS standard www.lem.com At the heart of power electronics. DVM_A4.indd 1 22.08.2016 16:01:39 EDITO Today, too many organizations are using social heavy upside if achieved. The driver of influence interactions as a way to make a quick impression, starts with making a commitment to content creation. rather than an opportunity to foster a mutually The second way is to make a commitment to sharing beneficial experience. In a world where we constantly buyer’s content in strategic ways that add value to have our eye on the immediate goals of delivering your buyer’s day, career or personal life. the right message to the right audience at the right Actively listening to your buyers and engaging time, we overlook key elements: relationships and proactively to stay visible and valuable throughout relevance. the entire journey and sales process. Time equals revenue.
  • Technologia Hyperloop I Perspektywy Jej Zastosowania

    Technologia Hyperloop I Perspektywy Jej Zastosowania

    28 Artykuäy Technologia Hyperloop i perspektywy jej zastosowania Krzysztof POLAK1 Streszczenie W artykule opisano najważniejsze zagadnienia związane z najnowszą technologią transportową, jaką ma być kolej próżnio- wa – Hyperloop. Przedstawiono podstawowe informacje dotyczące kolei próżniowej, jej bezpieczeństwa oraz możliwości rozwoju tej technologii w Polsce. Wskazano także korzyści, jakie mogą wynikać z rozwoju tej technologii w Polsce. Słowa kluczowe: Hyperloop, kolej próżniowa, nowoczesny transport 1. Wstęp technologii w Polsce. Artykuł jest również próbą wskazania najważniejszych korzyści mogących wynikać z rozwoju ko- Transport, zarówno pasażerski, jak i towarowy, stał się lei próżniowej w Polsce. obecnie coraz ważniejszym elementem życia, co powoduje powstawanie nowych, coraz bardziej złożonych i zindywi- dualizowanych modeli podróżowania. Dodatkowo, nowe 2. Czym jest Hyperloop? rozwiązania i modele podróżowania muszą umożliwiać przemieszczanie się z dużą prędkością, wypełniając wy- Hyperloop, zwany również koleją próżniową, jest to ro- magania zrównoważonego rozwoju. Człowiek wiele czasu dzaj transportu wykorzystujący kapsuły pasażerskie oraz poświęca na przemieszczanie siebie i swoich dóbr, a dzię- towarowe poruszające się w tunelu o obniżonym ciśnieniu. ki technologii Hyperloop możliwe jest uzyskanie tego, To połączenie pociągu i samolotu, umożliwiające prze- co obecnie jest najbardziej drogocenne – czyli czasu [6]. mieszczenie osób i / lub towarów z bardzo dużą prędkością. Kolej próżniowa Hyperloop może być uzupełnieniem Kapsuła ma poruszać się w specjalnym tunelu, w którym ci- dotychczasowego systemu transportowego na średnich śnienie ma wynosić około 100 Pa, czyli zaledwie 1% ciśnie- odległościach pomiędzy aglomeracjami miejskimi. Zakła- nia atmosferycznego. Dzięki takiemu rozwiązaniu znacząco da się, że będzie ona połączeniem zalet transportu kolejo- redukuje się opór powietrza. wego: bliska odległość stacji od centrum miast, krótkie od- prawy, a także lotniczego: duża prędkość.