Future Functioning and Structure of the Global Greens
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Sida Application
SIDA APPLICATION VO1 2016-2018 Green Forum Pustegränd 1-3 118 20 Stockholm [email protected] ABBREVIATIONS AGF African Greens Federation AGP Albanian Green Party CDN Cooperation & Development Network of Eastern Europe CEMAT Centro Mesoamericano de Estudios sobre Tecnolgìa Apropriada, Guatemala CEPROCA Centro de Produccion, Promocion y Capacitacion, Bolivia CSO Civil Society Organization EE Eastern Europe EGP European Green Parties (The Green group of the EU Parliament) ENoPS European Network of Political Foundations EVS European Voluntary Service (Programme) FYEG Federation of Young European Greens GEF Green European Foundation (PAO for the Green Group in EU) GeYG Georgian Young Greens GGWN Global Greens Women’s Network Groen Flemish Greens LGBT (Q) Lesbian, Gay, Bi-sexual, Transsexual (Questioning) NGO Non-Governmental Organization ODA Official Development Assistance PAO Politically Affiliated Organization PVE Partido verde ecología (The Bolivian Green Party) PME Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation PWC Price Waterhouse Coopers – Previous auditors of Green Forum PYPA Programme for Young Politicians in Africa Sage Accounting Software, used in AGF SDGs Sustainable Development Goals SGY Serbian Green Youth WF Westminster Foundation (UK). British found. handling PAO-support of British greens INDEX A. ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION 4 B. PROGRAMME DESCRIPTION 5 2 1. SUMMARY PROGRAMME DESCRIPTION AND APPROACH 5 2. GREEN FORUM AND THE GREEN MOVEMENT 6 3. OVERALL CONTEXTUAL ANALYSIS 7 4. ANALYSIS OF PROBLEMS AND PARTNERS 8 4.1 Problem Analysis 8 4.2 Analysis of prospects for the programme’s feasibility 8 4.3 Analysis of cooperation partners and programmes 9 5. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND THE STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK 10 5.1 The revised Green Forum Strategy and the overall objectives of the programme 10 5.2 Indicators 11 5.3 Human Rights Based Approach 11 6. -
Green Visions and Democratic Constraints the Possibility and Design of Democratic Institutions for Environmental Decision-Making
Green Visions and Democratic Constraints The Possibility and Design of Democratic Institutions for Environmental Decision-making James Ka-lei Wong 11 March 2013 (Revised Edition) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Government at the London School of Economics and Political Science 1 DECLARATION I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of the author. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 86,540 words. I can confirm that my thesis was copy edited for conventions of language, spelling and grammar by Jean Morris and Chris Steele. James Ka-lei Wong 2 ABSTRACT This thesis addresses a recurrent question of our time – whether democracy can secure environmental sustainability – by drawing on literatures in the normative theory of democracy, social choice theory and environmental politics. I propose a basic, yet substantial organising principle, the ‘dilemma of green democracy’, which maps out the possibility of realising green outcomes under democratic constraints. Interdisciplinary ideas from neighbouring disciplines are also imported for the purpose of studying the design of good environmental-democratic institutions. The analytical framework is an integrated one, comprising formal choice theory and normative democratic theory. -
Elemental Challenges: Environmental Troubles Beyond the Limits of Democracy
University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Open Access Dissertations 9-2010 Elemental Challenges: Environmental Troubles beyond the Limits of Democracy Brad Mapes-Martins University of Massachusetts Amherst, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/open_access_dissertations Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Mapes-Martins, Brad, "Elemental Challenges: Environmental Troubles beyond the Limits of Democracy" (2010). Open Access Dissertations. 295. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/open_access_dissertations/295 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ELEMENTAL CHALLENGES: ENVIRONMENTAL TROUBLES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF DEMOCRACY A Dissertation Presented by BRADLEY T. MAPES-MARTINS Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY September 2010 Department of Political Science © Copyright by Bradley T. Mapes-Martins 2010 All Rights Reserved ELEMENTAL -CHALLENGES: ENVIRONMENTAL TROUBLES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF DEMOCRACY A Dissertation Presented by BRADLEY T. MAPES-MARTINS Approved as to style and content by: Nicholas Xenos, Chair Barbara Cruikshank, Member John Hird, Member David Glassberg, Member John Hird, Department Chair Department of Political Science ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my gratitude to the members of my committee: Nicholas Xenos, Barbara Cruikshank, John Hird, and David Glassberg. Their willingness to listen to the earliest formulations of the ideas presented here and to accept the task of guiding and shaping them into a unified project is a benefit that I will surely never be able to repay. -
Green Party of Canadamedia
Green Party of Canada Media Kit History of the Green Party around the World The first Green Party in the world, the Values Party, was started in the early 1970s in New Zealand. In the western hemisphere, the first Green Party was formed in the Maritimes in the late seventies and was called the Small Party after E.F. Schumacher's book, Small is Beautiful. In Britain, the first Green Party was called the Ecology Party, before the name "green" became common. But it wasn't until the West German Green Party -- die Groenen -- crossed the vote threshold of 5% and entered the German legislature in the late 1970s, that the green political movement started in earnest. Presently there are over 100 Green parties world-wide, and there are Green members elected in dozens of countries. Green parties have served in coalition governments in Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Latvia and Ukraine. Legislative Achievements of Green Parties Members of Green parties around the world have been successful in their push for legislation that is consistent with the Global Green Charter, balancing ecological preservation with socially progressive values. In Paris, Deputy Mayor and Green Party member Denis Baupin, has helped push plans to ban all traffic in its congested downtown core by 2012, when Paris hopes to stage the Olympic Games. The ban will affect a nearly 5 kilometre-square area where only residents, buses, delivery vans and emergency vehicles will be allowed. In Spain, a Green party inspired bylaw has been passed which obliges builders to install solar panels to supply 60% of the hot water needs in new and fully rehabilitated residential blocks of 14 or more units, in all new heated pools, and for hospitals, clinics, schools, shopping centres and hotels. -
Download Balancing Act: the Australian Greens 2008-2011
Parliament of Australia Department of Parliamentary Services RESEARCH PAPER NO. 7, 2011–12 8 February 2012 Balancing act: the Australian Greens 2008–2011 Dr Joy McCann Politics and Public Administration Section Executive summary • In 2008 the Parliamentary Library published The rise of the Australian Greens which discussed the emergence of environmental politics in Australia, analysed the characteristics of Greens’ voters, and speculated as to whether the Australian Greens party would ever be more than ‘positioned on the edge’ of mainstream politics. • In the 2010 federal election, the Australian Greens emerged with the balance of power in the Senate and shared balance of power in the House of Representatives in the first hung federal parliament in Australia for 70 years. As a result, the ALP entered into an agreement with the Greens in order to secure the party’s commitment to a stable government during the 43rd Commonwealth Parliament. • The increased visibility of the Australian Greens at a national level has generated greater public scrutiny and debate about the implications of the Greens’ policy agenda for Australia, and exposed a lingering confusion about the true ideological nature of the party. • The party has a distinctive political culture and values with a ‘grassroots’ organisational structure reflecting its origins in social and environmental movements and citizen-led activism. • The party’s federal electoral success has also highlighted the way in which the Greens are engaged in a ‘balancing act’, both externally, as a coalition partner with the Labor government and as the balance-of-power party in the Senate, and internally, between the pragmatists and idealists within its membership. -
STATUTES of the EUROPEAN GREEN PARTY European Political Party (PPEU)
STATUTES of the EUROPEAN GREEN PARTY European Political Party (PPEU) adopted at the EGP Council, 12.11.2011, Paris amended at the EGP Council, 20-22 May 2016, Utrecht amended at the EGP Council, 2-4 December 2016, Glasgow amended at the EGP Council, 31 March 2017, Liverpool amended at the EGP Council, 26 November 2017, Karlstad Preamble The European Green Party represents Green Parties from all over Europe, and we are part of the Global Green family. We stand proudly for sustainable development and respect of human rights, built on the values of environmental responsibility, equality, freedom, justice, diversity and peace. Greens face the challenges of the 21st century by seeking to shape society in an innovative way. We propose policies for social solidarity and coherence compatible with sound economic and financial governance and which guarantee sustainability within our changing societies. For us and for generations to come. These Statutes replace and supersede the previous Statutes of the European Green Party published in the Moniteur Belge on 19/09/2013. ARTICLE 1 Definitions 1.1 “Full Members” means those members specified in Article 4.3.1. 1.2 “Members” means the entire membership of the European Green Party as specified in Article 4. 1.3 “Allocated Votes” means the total number of votes assigned at each Council meeting to Full Members, determined according to their size and other criteria under a formula detailed in the Rule Book, and to the Green Group in the European Parliament and the Federation of Young European Greens as specified in Article 5.3 and further detailed in the Rule Book. -
What Makes Green Parties Successful: a Comparative Analysis of Germany, Austria, and France
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Honors Theses, University of Nebraska-Lincoln Honors Program Fall 11-12-2020 What Makes Green Parties Successful: A Comparative Analysis of Germany, Austria, and France Macy Miller University of Nebraska - Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/honorstheses Part of the Comparative Politics Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Other International and Area Studies Commons, and the Political Economy Commons Miller, Macy, "What Makes Green Parties Successful: A Comparative Analysis of Germany, Austria, and France" (2020). Honors Theses, University of Nebraska-Lincoln. 284. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/honorstheses/284 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors Program at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses, University of Nebraska-Lincoln by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. WHAT MAKES GREEN PARTIES SUCCESSFUL: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF GERMANY, AUSTRIA, AND FRANCE An Undergraduate Honors Thesis Submitted in Partial fulfillment of University Honors Program Requirements University of Nebraska-Lincoln by Macy Miller, BA Global Studies College of Arts and Sciences November 12, 2020 Faculty Mentors: Ross Miller, PhD, Political Science Wes Peterson, PhD, Agricultural Economics WHAT MAKES GREEN PARTIES SUCCESSFUL 1 Table of Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... -
Charter of the Global Greens
CHARTER OF THE GLOBAL GREENS As adopted in Canberra 2001 and updated in Dakar 2012 The Global Greens is the international network of Green parties and political movements Contents Preamble............................................................................................................................... 2 Principles Ecological Wisdom ........................................................................................................ 4 Social Justice ..................................................................................................................... 4 Participatory Democracy .............................................................................................. 5 Nonviolence ..................................................................................................................... 5 Sustainability ..................................................................................................................... 6 Respect for Diversity ..................................................................................................... 7 Political Action 1. Democracy ................................................................................................................ 8 2. Equity .......................................................................................................................... 9 3. Climate Change and Energy ................................................................................ 10 4. Biodiversity ............................................................................................................ -
Dialogues on Party Systems and Global Democratisation
DIALOGUES ON PARTY SYSTEMS AND GLOBAL DEMOCRATISATION KATARINA SEHM-PATOMÄKI AND MARKO ULVILA (EDS.) NIGD WORKING PAPER 2/2006 ISSN: 1458-7815 Dialogues on Party Systems and ISBN-13: 952-5455-06-8 Global Democratisation ISBN-10: 978-952-5455-06-9 Katarina Sehm-Patomäki and Marko Ulvila (eds.) © The authors 2006 NIGD, Network Institute for Global Democratization www.nigd.org [email protected] NIGD Working Paper 2/2006 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements......................................................5 PART III: BACKGROUND PAPERS..................................79 Introduction................................................................6 Katarina Sehm-Patomäki and Marko Ulvila The Formation of Global Political Will.............................80 Tord Björk PART I: REPORTS FROM THE INTERNATIONAL DIALOGUES 7 Islam and Transnational Political Movements..................92 Marko Ulvila Dialogue Report I - Helsinki...........................................8 Annex: Should we have a global party?.........................97 Katarina Sehm-Patomäki and Marko Ulvila Marko Ulvila Dialogue Report II - New Delhi.....................................21 About the Contributors................................................99 Vagish K. Jha Dialogue Report III - Bamako......................................36 Katarina Sehm-Patomäki Dialogue report IV - Caracas........................................51 Hanna Laako PART II: INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATIONS OF POLITICAL PARTIES ...................................................................55 International -
Modern Environmentalism Was Born in the 1960S As a Response to the Eco- Logical Challenges of Postwar Industrial Development in North America and in Europe
Südosteuropa 63 (2015), no. 3, pp. 440-466 ENVIRONMENTALISM AND GREEN PARTIES ÜMIT ŞAHIN Intertwined and Contested. Green Politics and the Environmental Movement in Turkey Abstract. Late industrialization as well as political polarization and the rule of military re- gimes resulted in the belated onset of an environmental movement in Turkey. Environmental movements and green politics developed almost concurrently in the 1980s, while their major events and actors were intertwined. The first green party was established earlier than many countries, in 1988. This first party was short-lived, but afterwards, in the 1990s, green poli- tics contributed to the development and diversity of the environmental movement, which increasingly distanced itself from green politics. The second green party was established in 2008. There are many political and generational differences between the two Turkish green parties. Their main similarity is that neither fulfilled the eligibility criteria for entering the elections. Also, the existing ten per cent electoral threshold has been discouraging. Therefore the most indicative deficit of Turkey’s green politics has been its lack of an electoral challenge. Ümit Şahin is a senior scholar at the Istanbul Policy Center of Sabancı University, Istanbul. He is the editor-in-chief of the journal Üç Ekoloji (Three Ecologies). Introduction Modern environmentalism was born in the 1960s as a response to the eco- logical challenges of postwar industrial development in North America and in Europe. Green political parties in several countries were founded in the 1970s and 1980s. However, in Turkey an environmental movement emerged only in the mid-1980s, gradually developing into a full-fledged movement by the 1990s 1. -
Democracy and Green Political Thought
DEMOCRACY AND GREEN POLITICAL THOUGHT The green movement has posed some tough questions for traditional justifications of democracy. Should the natural world have rights? Can we take account of the interests of future generations? Do we need to replace existing institutions to deal with the ecological crisis? But questions have also been asked of the greens. Could their idealism undermine democracy? Can greens be effective democrats? In this book some of the leading writers on green political thought analyse these questions, examining the discourse of green movements concerning democracy, the status of democracy within green political thought, and the political institutions that might be necessary to ensure democracy in a sustainable society. The debates are not simply about the compatibility of democracy with green ideas, but also about how best to define democracy itself. The authors suggest that greens still have considerable work to do in fleshing out the weaker elements in their conceptions of democracy. In particular, representative institutions would still have an important role to play in any green democracy. But taking green ideas seriously does require reconsideration of some of the central foundations of liberal democracy, including the scope of the moral community and the privileged status of the atomised individual citizen, divorced from nature. Contributors: Wouter Achterberg, John Barry, Neil Carter, Peter Christoff, Andrew Dobson, Brian Doherty, Robyn Eckersley, Marius de Geus, Michael Kenny, Mike Mills and Michael Saward. EUROPEAN POLITICAL SCIENCE SERIES Edited by Hans Keman Vrije University, Amsterdam On behalf of the European Consortium for Political Research The European Political Science Series is published in Association with the European Consortium for Political Research—the leading organisation concerned with the growth and development of political science in Europe. -
The Climate Crisis South African and Global Democratic Eco-Socialist Alternatives
DEMOCRATIC MARXISM DEMOCRATIC MARXISM SERIES Series Editor: Vishwas Satgar The crisis of Marxism in the late twentieth century was the crisis of orthodox and van- guardist Marxism associated mainly with hierarchical communist parties, and imposed, even as state ideology, as the ‘correct’ Marxism. The Stalinisation of the Soviet Union and its eventual collapse exposed the inherent weaknesses and authoritarian mould of vanguardist Marxism. More fundamentally, vanguardist Marxism was rendered obsolete but for its residual existence in a few parts of the world, as well as within authoritarian national liberation movements in Africa and in China. With the deepening crises of capitalism, a new democratic Marxism (or democratic his- torical materialism) is coming to the fore. Such a democratic Marxism is characterised in the following ways: • Its sources span non-vanguardist grassroots movements, unions, political fronts, mass parties, radical intellectuals, transnational activist networks and parts of the progressive academy; • It seeks to ensure that the inherent categories of Marxism are theorised within constantly changing historical conditions to find meaning; • Marxism is understood as a body of social thought that is unfinished and hence challenged by the need to explain the dynamics of a globalising capitalism and the futures of social change; • It is open to other forms of anti-capitalist thought and practice, including cur- rents within radical ecology, feminism, emancipatory utopianism and indigenous thought; • It does not seek to be a monolithic and singular school of thought but engenders contending perspectives; • Democracy, as part of the heritage of people’s struggles, is understood as the basis for articulating alternatives to capitalism and as the primary means for con- stituting a transformative subject of historical change.