Dialogues on Party Systems and Global Democratisation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dialogues on Party Systems and Global Democratisation DIALOGUES ON PARTY SYSTEMS AND GLOBAL DEMOCRATISATION KATARINA SEHM-PATOMÄKI AND MARKO ULVILA (EDS.) NIGD WORKING PAPER 2/2006 ISSN: 1458-7815 Dialogues on Party Systems and ISBN-13: 952-5455-06-8 Global Democratisation ISBN-10: 978-952-5455-06-9 Katarina Sehm-Patomäki and Marko Ulvila (eds.) © The authors 2006 NIGD, Network Institute for Global Democratization www.nigd.org [email protected] NIGD Working Paper 2/2006 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements......................................................5 PART III: BACKGROUND PAPERS..................................79 Introduction................................................................6 Katarina Sehm-Patomäki and Marko Ulvila The Formation of Global Political Will.............................80 Tord Björk PART I: REPORTS FROM THE INTERNATIONAL DIALOGUES 7 Islam and Transnational Political Movements..................92 Marko Ulvila Dialogue Report I - Helsinki...........................................8 Annex: Should we have a global party?.........................97 Katarina Sehm-Patomäki and Marko Ulvila Marko Ulvila Dialogue Report II - New Delhi.....................................21 About the Contributors................................................99 Vagish K. Jha Dialogue Report III - Bamako......................................36 Katarina Sehm-Patomäki Dialogue report IV - Caracas........................................51 Hanna Laako PART II: INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATIONS OF POLITICAL PARTIES ...................................................................55 International left collaboration and socialist renewal........56 John Percy Socialist International.................................................61 Liberal International...................................................65 International Democrat Union......................................70 Miika Kopperoinen Global Greens............................................................73 Margaret Blakers 4 with NIGD took place during the busier times of this project, thank you for being with us! Particular thanks to Vijay Pratap for encouragement and advice throughout the process. And last, but definitely not least, a warm thank you to Lisa Jordan and the Ford Foundation for having funded the core of this project! The Editors ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First of all, we would like to thank all the contributors to this project; those of you who have written articles and comments for this Working Paper, and those who took active part in the dialogues. In addition to the names that appear in this volume, we would like to extend a particular thank you to Tord Björk, Patrick Bond, Devdutt, Norm Dixon, Roger Hällhag, Douglas Lummis, Harsh Mander, Alan Murphy, Thomas Ponniah, Suresh Sharma, Digvijay Singh and Peter Waterman for commenting, and at times sharply questioning, either our points of departure or the ideas around political parties ± or maybe both ± thus pushing our thinking forward. We would like to extend special thanks to Ruby van der Wekken for her high level of energy, contagious positive attitude and immense patience in facilitating the preparations and follow-up to the multilingual dialogues at the technically and administratively challenging polycentric social forums in Bamako, Mali (in French), Caracas, Venezuela (in Spanish) and Karachi, Pakistan (in English and Urdu). Thank you also to Sajjad Anwar, Rakesh Bhatt, Roxana Crisologo, Chhotan Das, Birendra Gupta, Vagish K. Jha, Arun Kumar, Hanna Laako, Jenny Lindborg, Jordi Lopez, Nizamuddin Nizamani, Johnattan Rupire, Mika Rönkkö, Mikko Sauli, Tove Selin, Gauri Shankar, Narendra Singh and Kai Vaara, for your participation and kind assistance in organising the dialogues in New Delhi, Bamako, Caracas, and Karachi. Thanks to Robyn Milburn ± the only native English speaker on this NIGD project team ± for speedy and thorough proof reading. Robyn's calm assistance in thoroughly transforming our clumsy English into smooth and flowing language has been most valuable. Coincidently, Robyn's internship 5 In order to facilitate the inclusion of voices outside the world of writing, NIGD organised four dialogues encouraging discussions on political parties, democracy and globalisation. The first dialogue took place in Helsinki in September 2005, a second one followed in New Delhi in November. The third and fourth dialogues were held in January 2006 in conjunction with the polycentric World Social Forums in Bamako, Mali and Caracas, Venezuela.3 At these dialogues, we presented and distributed early and partial drafts of the working papers. This Working Paper, Dialogues on Party Systems and Global INTRODUCTION Democratisation includes complete reports from the four dialogues, presentations of the Party Internationals and selected background documents. As part of this NIGD process, we have issued an accompanying sister NIGD Working Paper 1/2006 called Democratic Politics Globally ± Elements for Dialogue on Global Political Party Formations. It consists of the above Katarina Sehm-Patomäki and Marko Ulvila mentioned background paper and other contributions requested within the frames of the project. Additionally, in the paper we have included text boxes from the discussions held at the dialogues and presentations of the In April 2004, NIGD (Network Institute for Global Democratization) international associations of political parties. associates started discussions around the theme of a global political party. A Another accompanying NIGD volume, NIGD Discussion Paper 1/2006 quick round of consultation among our colleagues revealed that some, at entitled Political Parties and Global Democratisation: Lessons from the Past least Heikki Patomäki, Vijay Pratap and Teivo Teivainen, had at some point and Future Prospects summarises the new stage of our thinking following given thought to the concept of a global political party in their works.1 A the work of the Working Papers, and defines an agenda for future work and virtual visit to the library disclosed that in general, surprisingly little has debates. The specific focus of the NIGD Discussion Paper is to spark been written ± academic or otherwise ± on the theme of transnational discussions in and among different and differing corners, groups and actors association or operation of political parties. We also soon discovered that it around the globe on political parties. proves important to speak of parties in the plural as opposed to the singular. The Working Papers, the Discussion Paper, and additional material on The project Elements for a Dialogue on Global Political Party NIGD's project on global political parties are available on the site Formations kicked off in September 2005. The objective of the project was http://www.nigd.org/globalparties to hear views on the idea of global political parties from a diverse political and social spectrum. The methodology paralleled an earlier NIGD project, In Helsinki and Tampere, Finland, on 1 September 2006 North-South Dialogues2, where NIGD invites experts to write analysis on a certain theme, based on a background paper. In this current project, the background paper was written by Heikki Patomäki and Teivo Teivainen. Katarina Sehm-Patomäki Marko Ulvila [email protected] [email protected] 1 For an initial e-mail about the topic see Annex: Should we have a global party? 2 See Rikkilä, Leena and Katarina Sehm-Patomäki (eds) (2002): From a Global Market Place to Political Spaces - the North-South Dialogue Continues, NIGD Working Paper 3 The project organised also a dialogue session at the Karachi polycentric World Social 1/2002, Helsinki Forum VI in March 2006 to present the project. 6 PART I: REPORTS FROM THE INTERNATIONAL DIALOGUES 7 Thomas Wallgren, University of Helsinki, Finland As the current chair of NIGD, I would like to welcome you all. Our purpose Dialogue Report I today is to brainstorm and refresh our thinking regarding the concept of international political party formations. This is the topic of a new NIGD research project. We want to start the project on a good track, and for this reason we have initiated this session to share ideas and to conjure up fresh, AN INTERNATIONAL open-ended, new thinking. In this spirit, I will launch the discussions by noting the two main DIALOGUE ON PARTY aims that inform this project: firstly the political aim, providing tools that may be conducive to comprehensive democratisation and just SYSTEMS, DEMOCRACY AND transformation, and secondly, the intellectual aim, enhancing our self- understanding. The links and tensions between these aims are an ongoing GLOBALISATION reflective concern for many of us, but I shall not pursue that topic here. I will offer remarks on two large topics: the history and future of parties, and the discourse of global governance. And I will then close with 7 September 2005, Helsinki, Finland some more telegraphic remarks. In the modern world, parties fulfil the function of mediating between the will-formation that evolves from civil society and the execution of state power. In this function, parties are irreplaceable. In modern, complex Katarina Sehm-Patomäki and Marko Ulvila societies, direct democracy needs, even in ideal cases, substantial service from a representative system, with elected assemblies. Hence, modern social formations need, as an essential tool for democracy, civil society based organisations competing for the votes of electorates in free and fair On 7 September 2005, NIGD organised the first dialogue in a series of events elections. Such organisations play the role of parties, regardless
Recommended publications
  • Download the 2018-2019 Activity Report
    GENERAL 14-18 AUG ISTANBUL ASSEMBLY Financialactivity Conditions report 2018-2019and guidelines Activity Report 2018–2019 In the second part of 2018 and the first part of 2019 we implemented diverse activities, drafted resolutions, hosted progressive events, ran the campaign for the 2019 European elections and led many other processes that are defined in this document. FYEG’s work is taking place at a time where Europe is in a turbulent situation. We have a holistic, radical political vision of Europe, where we show the interlinkages between different issues - equality, sustainability, social justice, democracy. When it comes to political visions, we are a progressive think tank within the Green movement. With the capacities of the Executive Committee but also the Campaign Team, Prep Teams and several Working Groups, we continue to come up with radical ideas and push for change through in person meetings with various actors, state-of-the-art communication and impactful actions. Young Green Candidates had several, changemaking electoral successes in the European Elections, as well on local and national level - in Belgium, Ireland, Luxembourg, Finland and Germany. Many Young Greens (especially many young women* and including young people with a migrant background) were elected to local councils or parliaments around Europe. Besides, we see more and more youth standing up for what they think is right and taking their future in their own hands. A remarkable example are the climate strikes that spread all over Europe and mobilised tens of thousands of young people, mostly teenagers and high school students. These are important determinants for the future of Europe and of an ecological movements like us.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Guide for Member Organisations Global Young Green Elections
    ELECTION GUIDE FOR MEMBER ORGANISATIONS GLOBAL YOUNG GREEN ELECTIONS This guide is designed to answer key questions about the Global Young Green Steering Committee elections, which will be held online in Spring 2020. Summary ● When? Deadline Steering Committee candidate applications, See 23:59 CET, 23.04.2020 more information here. ​ ​ Registration of voters 23:59 CET, 23.04.2020 Vote 25.04.2020 - 04.05.2020 ● Where? Survey Monkey - an anonymised online voting platform. ● How? Registered representatives will be sent a link to vote. ● Who? Each Global Young Green Member Organisation has 1 vote. ​ ​ ● What voting system? Single Transferable Vote (voters are asked to rank candidates in order of preference and candidates are elected upon filling a quota of votes). Who votes? As stated in the GYG Organisational Principles, each Member Organisation of Global Young ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Greens has 1 vote. ​ ​ ● Please See Annex A for a full list of Member Organisations and votes. ​ ​ ● Please also refer to page 4 of the GYG Organisational Principles for more information ​ ​ on “Members”. Each Member Organisation is responsible for registering one person to vote on behalf of ​ ​ ​ ​ their organisation, this could be the Chair, International Secretary or Spokesperson, for example. How can I register to vote? Global Young Green Elections Spring 2020 Global Young Greens Oversight Committee To register one voter for your organisation please fill out the following registration survey ​ ​ until 23rd of April 2020, 23:59 CET: ​ Voter registration form region Africa: https://www.surveymonkey.de/r/9RBY335 ​ ​ ​ Voter registration form region Americas: https://www.surveymonkey.de/r/9S56MG5 ​ ​ ​ Voter registration form region Asia-Pacific: https://www.surveymonkey.de/r/9TK9D9R ​ ​ ​ Voter registration form region Europe: https://www.surveymonkey.de/r/MKKDN5S ​ ​ ​ How do I vote? 1.
    [Show full text]
  • GREEN YOUTH for a GLOBAL GREEN CHANGE Documentation
    GREEN YOUTH FOR A GLOBAL GREEN CHANGE Documentation of the 2nd Global Young Greens Congress Berlin, 8th to 14th of August 2010 Dear readers! 3 A short history of the Global Young Greens 4 HISTORY 2nd Congress 8 programmE 9 Regional Meetings 10 Workshops 12 the perspectives of small content scale farming and the agricultural issues 16 Green New Deal – A Concept for a Global Economic Change? 17 Impressions 18 General Assembly of GYG Congress Berlin 2010 20 Summary of our Structure Reform 21 GYG in Action 22 Passed Proposals 23 Statements 25 Participants 26 Introduction of the new Steering Committee 28 Plans 32 THANK-YOU‘S 30 IMPRINT 31 2 global young greens—Congress 2010 Dear readers! We proudly present to you the documentation of the 2nd Global Young Greens Congress held in Berlin from 8th to 14th of August 2010! More than 100 participants from over 50 countries spent five days of discussing as well as exchanging opinions and experiences from their homecountries in order to get closer together and fight with “Youth Power for a Global Green Change“. Workshops, fishbowl discussions and a world café were organised as parts of the congress. The debated topics were endless – reaching from economics and gender issues to social justice, peace and conflicts and - of course - climate change. After three days of debating, two days of General Assem- bly followed. In this, new structures were adopted as well as several topical proposals to form a wider political platform. With this documentation, we are trying to show what the congress was about and what was behind.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Sited Ethnography of Cosmopolitan Micropolitical Orientations
    SOFIA LAINE Young Actors in Transnational Agoras Multi-Sited Ethnography of Cosmopolitan Micropolitical Orientations ACADEMIC DISSERTATION To be presented for public examination with the permission of the Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, in Arppeanum, Snellmaninkatu 3, on Saturday, 11 February 2012 at 10 a.m. ISBN 978-952-5994-07-0 (Print, Finnish Youth Research Network / Finnish Youth Research Society) ISBN 978-952-10-7636-7 (Online, University of Helsinki) ISSN 1799-9219 Finnish Youth Research Network Finnish Youth Research Society Publications 121 © Finnish Youth Research Society and author Finnish Youth Research Network and Finnish Youth Research Society, publications 121 Layout: Tanja Konttinen ISBN 978-952-5994-07-0 ISSN 1799-9219 Unigrafia, Helsinki 2012 Orders: Finnish Youth Research Network Asemapäällikönkatu 1 FIN - 00520 Helsinki, FINLAND tel. +358 20 755 2653 http://www.nuorisotutkimusseura.fi/catalog PICTURE 1. The Global Young Greens planting trees as part of their Founding Conference’s programme in Nairobi 2007. (Photo: Raisa Kyllikki Ranta) PICTURE 2. Wangari Maathai (2004 Nobel Peace Prize Winner) planting a tree in the World Social Forum Nairobi 2007. (Photo: Raisa Kyllikki Ranta) [...] When he reached the place he was aiming for, he began making holes in the ground with his rod, putting an acorn in each and then covering it up again. He was planting oak trees. I asked him if the land was his. He said it wasn’t. Did he know who the owner was? No he didn’t. He thought it must be common land, or perhaps it belonged to people who weren’t interested in it.
    [Show full text]
  • 8Roundtablevienna2012 05 Pr
    ENGS was founded on December 7, 2005 in the EP in Brussels Our intention: Mobilize green seniors ( 55+) in all countries. There is a growing number of Seniors that have the time, energy, experience and enthusiasm to co-operate in a further expansion of the EGP. Brussels Declaration of the European Network of Green Seniors (ENGS) Made on December 7, 2005 The main points We demand that we seniors have an influence on political decisions and solutions. We would like to offer the opportunity for an open discussion about these topics with young people, especially the young Greens. We think that the European Green Seniors should contribute to this process. The Aims Well-founded contributions can only be made if the European Green Seniors regularly meet to discuss the following topics: ecology social security health care employment food protection mobility pluralistic culture pensions and other current problems and fields of our special interest such as life-long learning, voluntary participation in civil society We can make our positions public in concentrated support actions. And last but not least we want to see Green European perspectives (in general and focused on the problems of old people) realized at all levels. First: Established 4 Workshops: •Fight against poverty of older people •Age discrimination on the labour market •Economy without growth •An European Party of Green Seniors 3rd General Meeting in Vienna in October 2007 On the occasion of the EGP Council from October 12 – 14 in Vienna Green Seniors representing 14 Green parties from 13 European countries. •organized the first fringe meeting on the topic: Europe is Aging – challenge or Opportunitiy at the European Elections •carried out their first Climate Chance action •held their 3rd ENGS General Meeting in the Vienna Green Headquarters First Climate Change action in the main shopping aera of Vienna Manifesto of the 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Pontifícia Universidade Católica De São Paulo Puc-Sp
    PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DE SÃO PAULO PUC-SP Ermeli Damazo Viviani Pós-modernidade, Ambientalismo e Partido Verde: dilemas políticos na contemporaneidade. MESTRADO EM CIÊNCIAS SOCIAIS SÃO PAULO 2009 Livros Grátis http://www.livrosgratis.com.br Milhares de livros grátis para download. PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DE SÃO PAULO PUC-SP Ermeli Damazo Viviani Pós-modernidade, Ambientalismo e Partido Verde: dilemas políticos na contemporaneidade. MESTRADO EM CIÊNCIAS SOCIAIS Dissertação apresentada à Banca Examinadora como exigência parcial para a obtenção do título de MESTRE em Ciências Sociais pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, sob orientação do Prof. Dr. Cláudio Gonçalves Couto. SÃO PAULO 2009 Banca Examinadora _________________________________ _________________________________ _________________________________ Dedicatória Para minha amada família Agradecimentos Agradeço, especialmente, ao meu orientador Cláudio Gonçalves Couto, ao Programa de Ciências Sociais da PUC-SP e a CAPES. Sinto-me extremamente grata à professora Marijane Lisboa e ao professor Rinaldo, cujas observações feitas durante a qualificação foram essenciais para a condução da pesquisa. Agradeço a todas as pessoas que conheci na PUC (professores e colegas), que só me acrescentaram com coisas boas, e a minha família, que não se cansa de me ajudar. Resumo Pós-modernidade, ambientalismo e partido verde: dilemas políticos da contemporaneidade O presente trabalho tem como objetivo maior apontar para as conexões existentes entre o advento da condição pós-moderna, o desenvolvimento das questões ambientais em âmbito internacional e a conseqüente institucionalização das questões ecológicas. Esta última, por sua vez, pode ser visualizada através de alguns processos, tais como: a realização de conferências internacionais, a criação de organismos dispostos a tratar especialmente sobre o tema, o comprometimento de governos nacionais, assim como o processo de partidarização do ecologismo.
    [Show full text]
  • Sida Application
    SIDA APPLICATION VO1 2016-2018 Green Forum Pustegränd 1-3 118 20 Stockholm [email protected] ABBREVIATIONS AGF African Greens Federation AGP Albanian Green Party CDN Cooperation & Development Network of Eastern Europe CEMAT Centro Mesoamericano de Estudios sobre Tecnolgìa Apropriada, Guatemala CEPROCA Centro de Produccion, Promocion y Capacitacion, Bolivia CSO Civil Society Organization EE Eastern Europe EGP European Green Parties (The Green group of the EU Parliament) ENoPS European Network of Political Foundations EVS European Voluntary Service (Programme) FYEG Federation of Young European Greens GEF Green European Foundation (PAO for the Green Group in EU) GeYG Georgian Young Greens GGWN Global Greens Women’s Network Groen Flemish Greens LGBT (Q) Lesbian, Gay, Bi-sexual, Transsexual (Questioning) NGO Non-Governmental Organization ODA Official Development Assistance PAO Politically Affiliated Organization PVE Partido verde ecología (The Bolivian Green Party) PME Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation PWC Price Waterhouse Coopers – Previous auditors of Green Forum PYPA Programme for Young Politicians in Africa Sage Accounting Software, used in AGF SDGs Sustainable Development Goals SGY Serbian Green Youth WF Westminster Foundation (UK). British found. handling PAO-support of British greens INDEX A. ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION 4 B. PROGRAMME DESCRIPTION 5 2 1. SUMMARY PROGRAMME DESCRIPTION AND APPROACH 5 2. GREEN FORUM AND THE GREEN MOVEMENT 6 3. OVERALL CONTEXTUAL ANALYSIS 7 4. ANALYSIS OF PROBLEMS AND PARTNERS 8 4.1 Problem Analysis 8 4.2 Analysis of prospects for the programme’s feasibility 8 4.3 Analysis of cooperation partners and programmes 9 5. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND THE STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK 10 5.1 The revised Green Forum Strategy and the overall objectives of the programme 10 5.2 Indicators 11 5.3 Human Rights Based Approach 11 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Activity Report 2020-2021
    FYEG’s 2020-2021 Activity Report outlines each activity, whether statutory or educational, organised and hosted by FYEG, some- times with the support of our partners. This report covers the topics that each event was based on, in line with FYEG’s Activity Plan and aims as an organisation. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES The outputs of projects and conclusions from discussion are being collected in the Green Principles for a Just Transition and our magazine Ecosprinter is publishing a printed edition on 2020 Work Plan - Not Just a Transition just transition. The Work Plan was disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic and Online MO-MO Training moved online and to local context. In its new form, it consisted of 2 parts. In order to build the skills of Member Organisations and increase international networking and horizontal exchange During the series of webinars Just Transition Learning Labs among them, FYEG developed the concept of the MO-to-MO we introduced the concept of a just transition and explored online training. We first asked Member Organisations which the struggles the youth faces when trying to move away from skills and knowledge they need training on and which are their a carbon-intensive society. We analysed the implications this expertise and then reached out to potential trainers. transition might have on social and human rights both in rural and urban settings and what are the pre-existent problematics In April 2021, the first round of MO-to-MO online training is that have been accelerated in this time of health, social and defined: economic crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Visions and Democratic Constraints the Possibility and Design of Democratic Institutions for Environmental Decision-Making
    Green Visions and Democratic Constraints The Possibility and Design of Democratic Institutions for Environmental Decision-making James Ka-lei Wong 11 March 2013 (Revised Edition) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Government at the London School of Economics and Political Science 1 DECLARATION I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of the author. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 86,540 words. I can confirm that my thesis was copy edited for conventions of language, spelling and grammar by Jean Morris and Chris Steele. James Ka-lei Wong 2 ABSTRACT This thesis addresses a recurrent question of our time – whether democracy can secure environmental sustainability – by drawing on literatures in the normative theory of democracy, social choice theory and environmental politics. I propose a basic, yet substantial organising principle, the ‘dilemma of green democracy’, which maps out the possibility of realising green outcomes under democratic constraints. Interdisciplinary ideas from neighbouring disciplines are also imported for the purpose of studying the design of good environmental-democratic institutions. The analytical framework is an integrated one, comprising formal choice theory and normative democratic theory.
    [Show full text]
  • February 17, 2021 Dear President Biden and Vice
    February 17, 2021 Dear President Biden and Vice-President Harris, Congratulations on securing the people’s vote. As you know, your election is a testament to the tireless work of many people who believe a better world is possible and necessary. This is why we are calling upon you and your administration to walk the walk of real climate leadership. We, the undersigned public-interest organizations, represent millions of people across the United States and around the world who demand a climate just future, including youth, women, low-income communities, racially diverse communities, faith communities, and others. The people who voted for a better future are now ready to demand it from your administration. Amid a climate emergency that is wreaking unprecedented havoc, we write to you with an urgent request that is vitally important. We applaud your stated intent and action for the United States to rejoin the Paris Agreement at the earliest possible moment. We also call on your administration to go far beyond simply rejoining the 1 Paris Agreement and commit to honor the US’ Fair Share ​ in addressing the climate emergency. This ​ commitment to Fair Shares is already included in the Democratic Party’s Platform. To follow through, this will require bold, equitable and ambitious emissions reductions and a commitment to support less wealthy countries to do the same, including providing a significant amount of climate finance, far more than we committed to under the Obama administration. We commend your promise for this nation to become a climate leader. In addition to ambitious domestic action, this will require the US to take responsibility for its historical role in international climate policy and become a truly trusted partner, not on behalf of polluters but of people.
    [Show full text]
  • Call for Global Young Green Steering Committee Member
    FYEG General Assembly 2014 Call for Global Young Green Steering Committee Member 10th to 14th of July 2014 Location: Strasbourg, France Deadline for applications is postponed to 19th of June 12 AM CEST. FYEG represents the European Region within the Global Young Greens (GYG). As such we also have four representatives within the board (steering committee) of the GYG. Because of a resignation the FYEG General Assembly will elect one new European representative. This person will represent the European region together with our three other representatives until the next GYG General Assembly. About the Global Young Greens The Global Young Greens is an emerging youth­led organization supporting and uniting the efforts of young people from a green­alternative spectrum around the world. It works towards ecological sustainability, social justice, grassroots democracy and peace. Our objectives are ● to empower young people within the framework of participatory democracy, ● to create a space for young people to be active without being dominated by older generations, ● to address inequalities between organizations and individuals, ● to forge strong links between sectors and organizations and ● to further the Green principles on planet Earth. Our activities include finding opportunities for young people to get involved in our work, linking individuals and organizations with each other for various purposes as well as carrying on campaigns as GYG. What is the GYG Steering Committee? The Steering Committee is the second highest decision­making body of the Global Young Greens which is why it is important to have both experienced and active people involved. Its primary responsibility is to implement decisions of the Congress and to steer the network on behalf of its members.
    [Show full text]
  • Ermeli Damazo Viviani.Pdf
    PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DE SÃO PAULO PUC-SP Ermeli Damazo Viviani Pós-modernidade, Ambientalismo e Partido Verde: dilemas políticos na contemporaneidade. MESTRADO EM CIÊNCIAS SOCIAIS SÃO PAULO 2009 PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DE SÃO PAULO PUC-SP Ermeli Damazo Viviani Pós-modernidade, Ambientalismo e Partido Verde: dilemas políticos na contemporaneidade. MESTRADO EM CIÊNCIAS SOCIAIS Dissertação apresentada à Banca Examinadora como exigência parcial para a obtenção do título de MESTRE em Ciências Sociais pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, sob orientação do Prof. Dr. Cláudio Gonçalves Couto. SÃO PAULO 2009 Banca Examinadora _________________________________ _________________________________ _________________________________ Dedicatória Para minha amada família Agradecimentos Agradeço, especialmente, ao meu orientador Cláudio Gonçalves Couto, ao Programa de Ciências Sociais da PUC-SP e a CAPES. Sinto-me extremamente grata à professora Marijane Lisboa e ao professor Rinaldo, cujas observações feitas durante a qualificação foram essenciais para a condução da pesquisa. Agradeço a todas as pessoas que conheci na PUC (professores e colegas), que só me acrescentaram com coisas boas, e a minha família, que não se cansa de me ajudar. Resumo Pós-modernidade, ambientalismo e partido verde: dilemas políticos da contemporaneidade O presente trabalho tem como objetivo maior apontar para as conexões existentes entre o advento da condição pós-moderna, o desenvolvimento das questões ambientais em âmbito internacional e a conseqüente institucionalização das questões ecológicas. Esta última, por sua vez, pode ser visualizada através de alguns processos, tais como: a realização de conferências internacionais, a criação de organismos dispostos a tratar especialmente sobre o tema, o comprometimento de governos nacionais, assim como o processo de partidarização do ecologismo.
    [Show full text]