Keep US Moving TOGETHER WE CAN REACH $3 MILLION
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Submission to the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission
Roman Oszanski A Submission to the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission Preamble I have chosen not to follow the issues papers: their questions are more suited to those planning to expand the nuclear industry, and many of the issues raised are irrelevant if one believes that, based on the evidence, the industry should be left to die a natural death, rather than being supported to the exclusion of more promising technologies. Executive Summary The civil nuclear industry is in decline globally. [Ref charts on existing reactors, rising costs]. It is not an industry of the future, but of the past. If it were not for the intimate connection to the military industry, it would not exist today. There is no economic advantage to SA in expanding the existing industry in this state. Nuclear power does not offer a practical solution to climate change: total lifetime emissions are likely to be (at best) similar to those of gas power plants, and there is insufficient uranium to replace all the goal fired generators. A transition to breeder technologies leaves us with major problems of waste disposal and proliferation of weapons material. Indeed, the problems of weapons proliferation and the black market in fissionable materials mean that we should limit sales of Uranium to countries which are known proliferation risks, or are non- signatories to the NNPT: we should ban sales of Australian Uranium to Russia and India. There is a current oversupply of enrichment facilities, and there is considerable international concern at the possibility of using such facilities to enrich Uranium past reactor grade to weapons grade. -
Download the 2018-2019 Activity Report
GENERAL 14-18 AUG ISTANBUL ASSEMBLY Financialactivity Conditions report 2018-2019and guidelines Activity Report 2018–2019 In the second part of 2018 and the first part of 2019 we implemented diverse activities, drafted resolutions, hosted progressive events, ran the campaign for the 2019 European elections and led many other processes that are defined in this document. FYEG’s work is taking place at a time where Europe is in a turbulent situation. We have a holistic, radical political vision of Europe, where we show the interlinkages between different issues - equality, sustainability, social justice, democracy. When it comes to political visions, we are a progressive think tank within the Green movement. With the capacities of the Executive Committee but also the Campaign Team, Prep Teams and several Working Groups, we continue to come up with radical ideas and push for change through in person meetings with various actors, state-of-the-art communication and impactful actions. Young Green Candidates had several, changemaking electoral successes in the European Elections, as well on local and national level - in Belgium, Ireland, Luxembourg, Finland and Germany. Many Young Greens (especially many young women* and including young people with a migrant background) were elected to local councils or parliaments around Europe. Besides, we see more and more youth standing up for what they think is right and taking their future in their own hands. A remarkable example are the climate strikes that spread all over Europe and mobilised tens of thousands of young people, mostly teenagers and high school students. These are important determinants for the future of Europe and of an ecological movements like us. -
Election Guide for Member Organisations Global Young Green Elections
ELECTION GUIDE FOR MEMBER ORGANISATIONS GLOBAL YOUNG GREEN ELECTIONS This guide is designed to answer key questions about the Global Young Green Steering Committee elections, which will be held online in Spring 2020. Summary ● When? Deadline Steering Committee candidate applications, See 23:59 CET, 23.04.2020 more information here. Registration of voters 23:59 CET, 23.04.2020 Vote 25.04.2020 - 04.05.2020 ● Where? Survey Monkey - an anonymised online voting platform. ● How? Registered representatives will be sent a link to vote. ● Who? Each Global Young Green Member Organisation has 1 vote. ● What voting system? Single Transferable Vote (voters are asked to rank candidates in order of preference and candidates are elected upon filling a quota of votes). Who votes? As stated in the GYG Organisational Principles, each Member Organisation of Global Young Greens has 1 vote. ● Please See Annex A for a full list of Member Organisations and votes. ● Please also refer to page 4 of the GYG Organisational Principles for more information on “Members”. Each Member Organisation is responsible for registering one person to vote on behalf of their organisation, this could be the Chair, International Secretary or Spokesperson, for example. How can I register to vote? Global Young Green Elections Spring 2020 Global Young Greens Oversight Committee To register one voter for your organisation please fill out the following registration survey until 23rd of April 2020, 23:59 CET: Voter registration form region Africa: https://www.surveymonkey.de/r/9RBY335 Voter registration form region Americas: https://www.surveymonkey.de/r/9S56MG5 Voter registration form region Asia-Pacific: https://www.surveymonkey.de/r/9TK9D9R Voter registration form region Europe: https://www.surveymonkey.de/r/MKKDN5S How do I vote? 1. -
HON. GIZ WATSON B. 1957
PARLIAMENTARY HISTORY ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND STATE LIBRARY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA TRANSCRIPT OF AN INTERVIEW WITH HON. GIZ WATSON b. 1957 - STATE LIBRARY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA - ORAL HISTORY COLLECTION DATE OF INTERVIEW: 2015-2016 INTERVIEWER: ANNE YARDLEY TRANSCRIBER: ANNE YARDLEY DURATION: 19 HOURS REFERENCE NUMBER: OH4275 COPYRIGHT: PARLIAMENT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA & STATE LIBRARY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA. GIZ WATSON INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPTS NOTE TO READER Readers of this oral history memoir should bear in mind that it is a verbatim transcript of the spoken word and reflects the informal, conversational style that is inherent in such historical sources. The Parliament and the State Library are not responsible for the factual accuracy of the memoir, nor for the views expressed therein; these are for the reader to judge. Bold type face indicates a difference between transcript and recording, as a result of corrections made to the transcript only, usually at the request of the person interviewed. FULL CAPITALS in the text indicate a word or words emphasised by the person interviewed. Square brackets [ ] are used for insertions not in the original tape. ii GIZ WATSON INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPTS CONTENTS Contents Pages Introduction 1 Interview - 1 4 - 22 Parents, family life and childhood; migrating from England; school and university studies – Penrhos/ Murdoch University; religion – Quakerism, Buddhism; countryside holidays and early appreciation of Australian environment; Anti-Vietnam marches; civil-rights movements; Activism; civil disobedience; sport; studying environmental science; Albany; studying for a trade. Interview - 2 23 - 38 Environmental issues; Campaign to Save Native Forests; non-violent Direct Action; Quakerism; Alcoa; community support and debate; Cockburn Cement; State Agreement Acts; campaign results; legitimacy of activism; “eco- warriors”; Inaugural speech . -
Dollars for Death Say No to Uranium Mining & Nuclear Power
Dollars for Death Say No to Uranium Mining & Nuclear Power Jim Green & Others 2 Dollars for Death Contents Preface by Jim Green............................................................................3 Uranium Mining ...................................................................................5 Uranium Mining in Australia by Friends of the Earth, Australia..........................5 In Situ Leach Uranium Mining Far From ‘Benign’ by Gavin Mudd.....................8 How Low Can Australia’s Uranium Export Policy Go? by Jim Green................10 Uranium & Nuclear Weapons Proliferation by Jim Falk & Bill Williams..........13 Nuclear Power ...................................................................................16 Ten Reasons to Say ‘No’ to Nuclear Power in Australia by Friends of the Earth, Australia...................................................................16 How to Make Nuclear Power Safe in Seven Easy Steps! by Friends of the Earth, Australia...................................................................18 Japan: One Year After Fukushima, People Speak Out by Daniel P. Aldrich......20 Nuclear Power & Water Scarcity by Sue Wareham & Jim Green........................23 James Lovelock & the Big Bang by Jim Green......................................................25 Nuclear Waste ....................................................................................28 Nuclear Power: Watt a Waste .............................................................................28 Nuclear Racism .................................................................................31 -
MAC1 Abstracts – Oral Presentations
Oral Presentation Abstracts OP001 Rights, Interests and Moral Standing: a critical examination of dialogue between Regan and Frey. Rebekah Humphreys Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom This paper aims to assess R. G. Frey’s analysis of Leonard Nelson’s argument (that links interests to rights). Frey argues that claims that animals have rights or interests have not been established. Frey’s contentions that animals have not been shown to have rights nor interests will be discussed in turn, but the main focus will be on Frey’s claim that animals have not been shown to have interests. One way Frey analyses this latter claim is by considering H. J. McCloskey’s denial of the claim and Tom Regan’s criticism of this denial. While Frey’s position on animal interests does not depend on McCloskey’s views, he believes that a consideration of McCloskey’s views will reveal that Nelson’s argument (linking interests to rights) has not been established as sound. My discussion (of Frey’s scrutiny of Nelson’s argument) will centre only on the dialogue between Regan and Frey in respect of McCloskey’s argument. OP002 Can Special Relations Ground the Privileged Moral Status of Humans Over Animals? Robert Jones California State University, Chico, United States Much contemporary philosophical work regarding the moral considerability of nonhuman animals involves the search for some set of characteristics or properties that nonhuman animals possess sufficient for their robust membership in the sphere of things morally considerable. The most common strategy has been to identify some set of properties intrinsic to the animals themselves. -
GREEN YOUTH for a GLOBAL GREEN CHANGE Documentation
GREEN YOUTH FOR A GLOBAL GREEN CHANGE Documentation of the 2nd Global Young Greens Congress Berlin, 8th to 14th of August 2010 Dear readers! 3 A short history of the Global Young Greens 4 HISTORY 2nd Congress 8 programmE 9 Regional Meetings 10 Workshops 12 the perspectives of small content scale farming and the agricultural issues 16 Green New Deal – A Concept for a Global Economic Change? 17 Impressions 18 General Assembly of GYG Congress Berlin 2010 20 Summary of our Structure Reform 21 GYG in Action 22 Passed Proposals 23 Statements 25 Participants 26 Introduction of the new Steering Committee 28 Plans 32 THANK-YOU‘S 30 IMPRINT 31 2 global young greens—Congress 2010 Dear readers! We proudly present to you the documentation of the 2nd Global Young Greens Congress held in Berlin from 8th to 14th of August 2010! More than 100 participants from over 50 countries spent five days of discussing as well as exchanging opinions and experiences from their homecountries in order to get closer together and fight with “Youth Power for a Global Green Change“. Workshops, fishbowl discussions and a world café were organised as parts of the congress. The debated topics were endless – reaching from economics and gender issues to social justice, peace and conflicts and - of course - climate change. After three days of debating, two days of General Assem- bly followed. In this, new structures were adopted as well as several topical proposals to form a wider political platform. With this documentation, we are trying to show what the congress was about and what was behind. -
Mann, Monique& Rimmer, Matthew (2016) Submission to the Senate Economics References Committee on the 2016 Census
This may be the author’s version of a work that was submitted/accepted for publication in the following source: Mann, Monique& Rimmer, Matthew (2016) Submission to the Senate Economics References Committee on the 2016 Census. This file was downloaded from: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/99687/ c Copyright 2016 Monique Mann and Matthew Rimmer This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the docu- ment is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recog- nise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to [email protected] Notice: Please note that this document may not be the Version of Record (i.e. published version) of the work. Author manuscript versions (as Sub- mitted for peer review or as Accepted for publication after peer review) can be identified by an absence of publisher branding and/or typeset appear- ance. If there is any doubt, please refer to the published source. September 2016 SUBMISSION TO THE SENATE ECONOMICS REFERENCES COMMITTEE ON THE 2016 CENSUS DR MONIQUE MANN LECTURER SCHOOL OF JUSTICE FACULTY OF LAW QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY DR MATTHEW RIMMER PROFESSOR OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY -
Multi-Sited Ethnography of Cosmopolitan Micropolitical Orientations
SOFIA LAINE Young Actors in Transnational Agoras Multi-Sited Ethnography of Cosmopolitan Micropolitical Orientations ACADEMIC DISSERTATION To be presented for public examination with the permission of the Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, in Arppeanum, Snellmaninkatu 3, on Saturday, 11 February 2012 at 10 a.m. ISBN 978-952-5994-07-0 (Print, Finnish Youth Research Network / Finnish Youth Research Society) ISBN 978-952-10-7636-7 (Online, University of Helsinki) ISSN 1799-9219 Finnish Youth Research Network Finnish Youth Research Society Publications 121 © Finnish Youth Research Society and author Finnish Youth Research Network and Finnish Youth Research Society, publications 121 Layout: Tanja Konttinen ISBN 978-952-5994-07-0 ISSN 1799-9219 Unigrafia, Helsinki 2012 Orders: Finnish Youth Research Network Asemapäällikönkatu 1 FIN - 00520 Helsinki, FINLAND tel. +358 20 755 2653 http://www.nuorisotutkimusseura.fi/catalog PICTURE 1. The Global Young Greens planting trees as part of their Founding Conference’s programme in Nairobi 2007. (Photo: Raisa Kyllikki Ranta) PICTURE 2. Wangari Maathai (2004 Nobel Peace Prize Winner) planting a tree in the World Social Forum Nairobi 2007. (Photo: Raisa Kyllikki Ranta) [...] When he reached the place he was aiming for, he began making holes in the ground with his rod, putting an acorn in each and then covering it up again. He was planting oak trees. I asked him if the land was his. He said it wasn’t. Did he know who the owner was? No he didn’t. He thought it must be common land, or perhaps it belonged to people who weren’t interested in it. -
Australia's Faunal Extinction Crisis
The Senate Environment and Communications References Committee Australia’s faunal extinction crisis Interim report April 2019 © Commonwealth of Australia 2019 ISBN 978-1-76010-967-7 Committee contact details PO Box 6100 Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Tel: 02 6277 3526 Fax: 02 6277 5818 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.aph.gov.au/senate_ec This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia License. The details of this licence are available on the Creative Commons website: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/au/. This document was printed by the Senate Printing Unit, Parliament House, Canberra Committee membership Committee members Senator Janet Rice, Chair AG, Tasmania Senator Jonathan Duniam, Deputy Chair LP, Tasmania Senator Anthony Chisholm ALP, Queensland Senator the Hon Kristina Keneally ALP, New South Wales Senator Steve Martin NATS, Tasmania Senator Anne Urquhart ALP, Tasmania Substitute member for this inquiry Senator Carol Brown (ALP, TAS) for Senator Anne Urquhart on 4 February 2019 Senator Murray Watt (ALP, QLD) for Senator Anthony Chisholm on 31 January 2019 and 1 February 2019 Participating members for this inquiry Senator Larissa Waters AG, Queensland Senator Peter Whish-Wilson AG, Tasmania Committee secretariat Ms Christine McDonald, Committee Secretary Mr Nicholas Craft, Principal Research Officer Ms Nicola Knackstredt, Acting Principal Research Officer Mr Michael Perks, Research Officer Ms Georgia Fletcher, Administrative Officer iii iv Table of contents -
Additional Estimates 2015–16
© Commonwealth of Australia 2015 978-1-76010-357-6 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia License. The details of this licence are available on the Creative Commons website: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/au/ Printed by the Senate Printing Unit, Parliament House, Canberra. ii Senate Economics Legislation Committee Members Senator Sean Edwards, Chair South Australia, LP Senator Chris Ketter, Deputy Chair Queensland, ALP Senator David Bushby Tasmania, LP Senator Sam Dastyari New South Wales, ALP Senator Matthew Canavan Queensland, LP Senator Nick Xenophon South Australia, IND Senators in attendance Senator Cory Bernardi South Australia, LP Senator David Bushby Tasmania, LP Senator Matthew Canavan Tasmania, LP Senator the Hon Kim Carr Victoria, ALP Senator Sam Dastyari New South Wales, ALP Senator Sean Edwards South Australia, LP Senator the Hon Bill Heffernan New South Wales, LP Senator Chris Ketter Queensland, ALP Senator David Leyonhjelm New South Wales, LDP Senator Scott Ludlam Western Australia, AG Senator the Hon Ian MacDonald Queensland, LP Senator John Madigan Victoria, IND Senator Jennifer McAllister New South Wales, ALP Senator Nick McKim Tasmania, AG Senator the Hon Jan McLucas Queensland, ALP Senator Deborah O'Neill New South Wales, ALP Senator Lee Rhiannon New South Wales, AG Senator Janet Rice Victoria, AG Senator Rachel Siewert Western Australia, AG Senator Glenn Sterle Western Australia, ALP Senator Zhenya Wang Western Australia, PUP Senator Peter Whish-Wilson Tasmania, AG Senator John Williams New South Wales, NATS Senator the Hon Penny Wong South Australia, ALP Senator Nick Xenophon South Australia, IND iii Secretariat Dr Kathleen Dermody, Secretary Ms Leonie Lam, Research Officer PO Box 6100 Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Ph: 02 6277 3540 Fax: 02 6277 5719 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.aph.gov.au/senate_economics iv . -
Social Movements and Political Parties: Conflicts and Balance1
Social movements and political parties: conflicts and balance1 Lee Rhiannon Abstract The paper addresses aspects of the relationship between political parties and social movements, with a focus on the Australian Greens. It posits some of the limitations and possibilities of this relationship, arguing that it is a necessary one, both to social movements seeking to pursue their agendas through the political system, and to political parties needing to be open to broad public participation and to maintain strong links to on-the-ground issues. It concludes that the Australian Greens have sought to strike a balance between party and movement, recognising the limits of both. Introduction For much of the 19th and 20th centuries the Left was renowned for being strong on organisation while the conservative side of politics relied on money and media dominance to advance their causes. The term "organising" is not used here to mean "well organised" in progressive politics, organising is about a commitment to involve and empower people through democratic decision-making. The term organising in Left politics embodies the society that is strived-for (see Alinsky 1971; Bobo et al 2001). Organising as a tool for building democratic structures and taking the message to a wider audience is at the core of progressive movements and political parties (Bronfenbrenner 1998; Doyle 2001). Without that commitment, focussed campaigns and progressive political parties will fail to bring about the far-reaching structural changes required to build a society free of exploitation of people and the environment (Kovel 2007; Panitch 2007). While right wing commentators and conservative politicians abuse the Left for a lack of democracy – and there have been dictators, big and small – a deep commitment to participatory democracy has characterised most progressive movements and political parties (see Maddison and Hamilton 2006).