Field Trial of Methoxyflurane, Nitrous Oxide, and Trichloroethylene As Obstetric Analgesics Br Med J: First Published As 10.1136/Bmj.3.5665.263 on 2 August 1969

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Field Trial of Methoxyflurane, Nitrous Oxide, and Trichloroethylene As Obstetric Analgesics Br Med J: First Published As 10.1136/Bmj.3.5665.263 on 2 August 1969 BRITISH 2 August 1969 MEDICAL JOURNAL 263 Field Trial of Methoxyflurane, Nitrous Oxide, and Trichloroethylene as Obstetric Analgesics Br Med J: first published as 10.1136/bmj.3.5665.263 on 2 August 1969. Downloaded from M. ROSEN,* F.F.A. R.C.S.; W. W. MUSHIN,t F.R.C.S., F.F.A. R.C.S.; P. L. JONES, F.F.A. R.C.S.; E. V. JONES§ British Medical Journal, 1969, 3, 263-267 ummary: In a field trial of 1,257 patients receiving Nitrous-oxide/oxygen (50% /50% v.v.) was given by the methoxyflurane, trichloroethylene, and nitrous- Entonox apparatus, trichloroethylene (0-5% and 0 35 % v.v. in oxide/oxygen for the relief of pain in labour methoxy- air) by the Emotril and Tecota vaporizers, and methoxyflurane flurane has been shown to have certain advantages which (0-35% v.v. in air) by a modified Tecota, also known as the support its use in midwifery practice. The trial confirms " Cardiff " inhaler. The calibration of each vaporizer was our objective method for screening an inhalational agent checked before the trial by gas chromatography and again at as an obstetric analgesic. intervals during the trial. The midwives were instructed to use inhalation analgesia in their usual manner. No restrictions were on the use of Introduction placed other drugs such as pethidine. After the trial was completed another questionary was sent Methoxyflurane has been shown by a comparison with by post to each of the participating midwives, in order to get trichloroethylene (Major et al., 1966) and with nitrous oxide a picture of the practical experience of the midwives and of (Jones et al., 1969a, 1969b) to have certain advantages over their final opinions about methoxyflurane. them as an obstetric analgesic. During each of these trials an anaesthetist was present continuously as an assessor. His presence may have affected the results, though it is hoped Results equally for each drug being compared. It is still necessary, therefore, to show whether the differences which emerged from Randomization these trials are still present if methoxyflurane were used in A total of mothers were studied general midwifery practice. In addition it is to 1,257 (Table I). The com- important bined number of determine whether any advantages which methoxyflurane might trichloroethylene and nitrous oxide patients is to have would be sufficient to make the drug especially attractive similar that of methoxyflurane patients, because the mid- for use by midwives. wife was allowed to use either trichloroethylene or nitrous oxide as an alternative to methoxyflurane. The difference in number between nitrous oxide and trichloroethylene is partly due to the Method rearrangement of the trial at the beginning. Trichloroethylene had a slight start over nitrous oxide. A field trial was conducted in eight maternity units in South Wales. The plan was discussed thoroughly with the medical TABLE I.-Distribution of Cases and nursing staff in each hospital before the trial began. The No. of Methoxy-| Trichloro- Nitrous http://www.bmj.com/ trial was carried out under the supervision of a consultant Cases flurane ethylene Oxide anaesthetist in each hospital. Originally it was intended to Total .1,257 598 394 265 compare methoxyflurane and trichloroethylene. Shortly after starting we Multiparae .. .. 703 347 (58%*) 226 (57 5%) 130 (49%/0) the trial felt it desirable to include nitrous oxide Assisted deliveries 144 68 (110%) 46 (11*5%) 30 (11°') because of parallel detailed studies in this department (Jones Caesarean section .. 8 5 (1%) 3 (0-8%) 0 et al., 1969a, 1969b). Furthermore, we sensed that some mid- * The percentages are of each agent. wives were disinclined to use trichloroethylene. The trial was There are significantly fewer multiparae in the nitrous oxide group than in the methoxyflurane group (P < 0-02) or in the trichloroethylene group (P < 0-05). therefore rearranged to compare methoxyflurane with a free choice of either trichloroethylene or nitrous on 30 September 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. oxide. The day The number of multiparae in the nitrous oxide group is on which either methoxyflurane or the choice of nitrous oxide significantly lower than in each of the other two. A detailed or trichloroethylene could be used was randomized on a calendar examination of individual hospital results shows that when this which stood in the labour room. On Sundays the midwife difference is taken into account it does not affect had an open choice of agent. the results of the midwives' assessment of pain relief or restlessness, the The data were entered by the midwife on a self-coding chart mothers' opinion of pain relief, or any of the other results suitably arranged for transference to Hollerith cards. Besides reported in this paper. There is no significant difference recording personal details and data about complications of between the groups as regards mode of delivery and the dura, pregnancy, this dealt with details of the anaesthetic inhaled; tion of the various stages of labour. The primiparae in the other drugs given; the duration of labour and method of methoxyflurane group had shorter first stages than those who delivery; the condition of the baby; the midwife's opinion on had the other agents. the mother's condition during labour; and the mother's opinion Other Drugs (Table II).-Over half of the patients received of the pain relief. The mother was questioned by her midwife pethidine within four hours of the beginning of inhalation, but immediately after delivery and again by the ward sister two days later. there is only a negligible difference between the groups. Of those mothers who had pethidine, 5-7% had had more than Each hospital was visited by us at about weekly intervals, not only to ensure smooth running of the trial but also to TABLE II.-Distribution of Administration of Drugs ensure that the trial was being conducted so far as possible in No a uniform manner. Comments by the midwife were Drugs Pethidine Others noted, Agent Total though special care was taken not to influence these. No. % No. 'IO No. % Methoxyflurane.. .. 238 40 333 56 27 4 598 *Consultant Anaesthetist. Trichloroethylene .. 151 38 228 58 15 4 394 t Professor of Anaesthetics. Nitrous oxide .. .. 87 33 166 63 12 4 265 Research Registrar. Research Fellow. 476 38 727 58 54 4 1,257 Department of Anaesthetics, Royal Infirmary, Cardiff CF2 1SZ. No significant difference between agents. C 264 2 August 1969 Obstetric Analgesics-Rosen et al. MEDICALBRM JOURNALSr 150 mg. within four hours of inhalation. Other drugs such as Midwives' Opinion (Table V).-The midwives considered morphine were given to only a very small number of mothers that more patients who had methoxyfIurane (14%) were excel- Br Med J: first published as 10.1136/bmj.3.5665.263 on 2 August 1969. Downloaded from in each group. lent than were those who had nitrous oxide (7%) (P<001). Duration of Inhalation (Fig. 1).-The duration of inhalation The number considered excellent and good is also significantly of methoxyflurane is shorter than that of nitrous oxide more for methoxyflurane (53%) (P<001) and for trichloro- (P<0 02) and of trichloroethylene (P>03). This relates to the ethylene (49%) (P<002) than for nitrous oxide. shorter first stages of the primiparae in the methoxyflurane group. TABLE V.-Midwives' Opinion of Pain Relief Excellent Good Adequate Inadequ 14 No. % No. % No. % No. mnethox'jflurane 12 Fn trichlorcethylene nitrous oxide 10' Mean du-7-on methoxyflurcrie1 rn n. V0 iP<002 40 8 ni trous oxide ....... 103 4 min. trichloroethylene Nausea and Vomiting -' 97 5 min. 0 Immediately after delivery 23 % of the methoxyflurane patients, 22% of the trichloroethylene patients, and 19% of the nitrous oxide patients said they felt sick. Of these, 7-5% of the 4. methoxyflurane group, 6% of the trichloroethylene group, and 7-5% of the nitrous oxide group vomited. There is no signi- 2 ficant difference between the agents for any of these figures. U j. Duration of inhalction ( hours) Restlessness FIG. 1.-Distribution of duration of inhalation. Midwives' Opinion.-There is no significant difference between the results for the three agents (Table VI). Never- theless, when those who had not had pethidine are considered Pain Relief (Fig. 2) there is significantly less restlessness with methoxy- flurane than with nitrous oxide (P<005). Where pethidine Mothers' Opinion (Table III).-There is no great difference had been given there is no difference between the agents. If between any of the drugs. Thirty-five per cent. of all the the methoxyflurane patients are considered alone, those who the mothers changed their mind at the second questioning, but did not have pethidine were significantly less restless than those http://www.bmj.com/ changes in either direction made little difference to the results. who did (P<0-01). Trichloroethylene patients showed a similar difference (P<O01). Nitrous oxide patients had the TABLE III.-Mothers' Opinion of Pain Relief same degree of restlessness whether pethidine had been given Complete Considerable Slight None or not. Agent .Total No. % No. 1 % No. % No. % TABLE VI.-Midwives' Opinion of Restlessness Methoxy- flurane .. 69 11-5 352 59 154 26 23 3 5 598 Never ShortPeriods Long Periods Trichloro- Total Agent _ on 30 September 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. ethylene 47 12 235 60 98 25 14 3 394 No. % No. % No. % Nitrous oxide 29 11 161 61 66 25 9 3 265 Methoxyflurane .. 242 41 310 52 46 7 598 145 11-51 7*8 59 5 318 25-51 46 3-5 1,257 Trichloroethylene .. 153 39 206 52 35 9 394 Nitrous oxide .. .. 95 36 157 59 13 5 265 No significant difference between agents.
Recommended publications
  • Pharmacology – Inhalant Anesthetics
    Pharmacology- Inhalant Anesthetics Lyon Lee DVM PhD DACVA Introduction • Maintenance of general anesthesia is primarily carried out using inhalation anesthetics, although intravenous anesthetics may be used for short procedures. • Inhalation anesthetics provide quicker changes of anesthetic depth than injectable anesthetics, and reversal of central nervous depression is more readily achieved, explaining for its popularity in prolonged anesthesia (less risk of overdosing, less accumulation and quicker recovery) (see table 1) Table 1. Comparison of inhalant and injectable anesthetics Inhalant Technique Injectable Technique Expensive Equipment Cheap (needles, syringes) Patent Airway and high O2 Not necessarily Better control of anesthetic depth Once given, suffer the consequences Ease of elimination (ventilation) Only through metabolism & Excretion Pollution No • Commonly administered inhalant anesthetics include volatile liquids such as isoflurane, halothane, sevoflurane and desflurane, and inorganic gas, nitrous oxide (N2O). Except N2O, these volatile anesthetics are chemically ‘halogenated hydrocarbons’ and all are closely related. • Physical characteristics of volatile anesthetics govern their clinical effects and practicality associated with their use. Table 2. Physical characteristics of some volatile anesthetic agents. (MAC is for man) Name partition coefficient. boiling point MAC % blood /gas oil/gas (deg=C) Nitrous oxide 0.47 1.4 -89 105 Cyclopropane 0.55 11.5 -34 9.2 Halothane 2.4 220 50.2 0.75 Methoxyflurane 11.0 950 104.7 0.2 Enflurane 1.9 98 56.5 1.68 Isoflurane 1.4 97 48.5 1.15 Sevoflurane 0.6 53 58.5 2.5 Desflurane 0.42 18.7 25 5.72 Diethyl ether 12 65 34.6 1.92 Chloroform 8 400 61.2 0.77 Trichloroethylene 9 714 86.7 0.23 • The volatile anesthetics are administered as vapors after their evaporization in devices known as vaporizers.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,603,526 B2 Tygesen Et Al
    USOO8603526B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,603,526 B2 Tygesen et al. (45) Date of Patent: Dec. 10, 2013 (54) PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS 2008. O152595 A1 6/2008 Emigh et al. RESISTANT TO ABUSE 2008. O166407 A1 7/2008 Shalaby et al. 2008/0299.199 A1 12/2008 Bar-Shalom et al. 2008/0311205 A1 12/2008 Habib et al. (75) Inventors: Peter Holm Tygesen, Smoerum (DK); 2009/0022790 A1 1/2009 Flath et al. Jan Martin Oevergaard, Frederikssund 2010/0203129 A1 8/2010 Andersen et al. (DK); Karsten Lindhardt, Haslev (DK); 2010/0204259 A1 8/2010 Tygesen et al. Louise Inoka Lyhne-versen, Gentofte 2010/0239667 A1 9/2010 Hemmingsen et al. (DK); Martin Rex Olsen, Holbaek 2010, O291205 A1 11/2010 Downie et al. (DK); Anne-Mette Haahr, Birkeroed 2011 O159100 A1 6/2011 Andersen et al. (DK); Jacob Aas Hoellund-Jensen, FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS Frederikssund (DK); Pemille Kristine Hoeyrup Hemmingsen, Bagsvaerd DE 20 2006 014131 1, 2007 (DK) EP O435,726 8, 1991 EP O493513 7, 1992 EP O406315 11, 1992 (73) Assignee: Egalet Ltd., London (GB) EP 1213014 6, 2002 WO WO 89,09066 10, 1989 (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this WO WO91,040 15 4f1991 patent is extended or adjusted under 35 WO WO95/22962 8, 1995 U.S.C. 154(b) by 489 days. WO WO99,51208 10, 1999 WO WOOOf 41704 T 2000 WO WO 03/024426 3, 2003 (21) Appl. No.: 12/701,429 WO WOO3,O24429 3, 2003 WO WOO3,O24430 3, 2003 (22) Filed: Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (CASRN 71-55-6) | IRIS
    Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chemical Assessment Summary National Center for Environmental Assessment 1,1,1-Trichloroethane; CASRN 71-55-6 Human health assessment information on a chemical substance is included in the IRIS database only after a comprehensive review of toxicity data, as outlined in the IRIS assessment development process. Sections I (Health Hazard Assessments for Noncarcinogenic Effects) and II (Carcinogenicity Assessment for Lifetime Exposure) present the conclusions that were reached during the assessment development process. Supporting information and explanations of the methods used to derive the values given in IRIS are provided in the guidance documents located on the IRIS website. STATUS OF DATA FOR 1,1,1-Trichloroethane File First On-Line 03/31/1987 Category (section) Assessment Available? Last Revised Oral RfD (I.A.) Acute Oral RfD (I.A.1.) qualitative discussion 09/28/2007 Short-term Oral RfD (I.A.2.) qualitative discussion 09/28/2007 Subchronic Oral RfD (I.A.3.) yes 09/28/2007 Chronic Oral RfD (I.A.4.) yes 09/28/2007 Inhalation RfC (I.B.) Acute Inhalation RfC (I.B.1.) yes 09/28/2007 Short-term Inhalation RfC (I.B.2.) yes 09/28/2007 Subchronic Inhalation RfC (I.B.3.) yes 09/28/2007 1 Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chemical Assessment Summary National Center for Environmental Assessment Category (section) Assessment Available? Last Revised Chronic Inhalation RfC (I.B.4.) yes 09/28/2007 Carcinogenicity Assessment (II.) yes 09/28/2007 I. Health Hazard Assessments for Noncarcinogenic Effects I.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Alfaxalone Or Propofol on Giant-Breed Dog Neonates Viability
    animals Article Effects of Alfaxalone or Propofol on Giant-Breed Dog Neonates Viability During Elective Caesarean Sections Monica Melandri 1, Salvatore Alonge 1,* , Tanja Peric 2, Barbara Bolis 3 and Maria C Veronesi 3 1 Società Veterinaria “Il Melograno” Srl, 21018 Sesto Calende, Varese, Italy; [email protected] 2 Department of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Sciences, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy; [email protected] 3 Department of Veterinary Medicine, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20100 Milan, Italy; [email protected] (B.B.); [email protected] (M.C.V.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-392-805-8524 Received: 20 September 2019; Accepted: 7 November 2019; Published: 13 November 2019 Simple Summary: Nowadays, thanks to the increased awareness of owners and breeders and to the most recent techniques available to veterinarians, the management of parturition, especially of C-sections, has become a topic of greater importance. Anesthesia is crucial and must be targeted to both the mother and neonates. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of the induction agent alfaxalone on the vitality of puppies born from elective C-section, in comparison to propofol. After inducing general anesthesia for elective C-section, puppies from the mothers induced with alfaxalone had higher 5-min Apgar scores than those induced with propofol. The concentration of cortisol in fetal fluids collected at birth is neither influenced by the anesthetic protocol used, nor does it differ between amniotic and allantoic fluids. Nevertheless, the cortisol concentration in fetal fluids affects the relationship between anesthesia and the Apgar score: the present study highlights a significant relationship between the anesthetic protocol used and Apgar score in puppies, and fetal fluids cortisol concentration acts as a covariate of this relationship.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacological Classification of the Abuse-Related Discriminative
    Ashdin Publishing Journal of Drug and Alcohol Research ASHDIN Vol. 3 (2014), Article ID 235839, 10 pages publishing doi:10.4303/jdar/235839 Research Article Pharmacological Classification of the Abuse-Related Discriminative Stimulus Effects of Trichloroethylene Vapor Keith L. Shelton and Katherine L. Nicholson Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, P.O. Box 980613, Richmond, VA 23298, USA Address correspondence to Keith L. Shelton, [email protected] Received 10 December 2013; Revised 2 January 2014; Accepted 27 January 2014 Copyright © 2014 Keith L. Shelton and Katherine L. Nicholson. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Inhalants are distinguished as a class primarily based upon common means of administration suggests a homogeneity of a shared route of administration. Grouping inhalants according to mechanism and behavioral effects that may be scientifically their abuse-related in vivo pharmacological effects using the drug unwarranted. As an illustration of the inadequacy of this discrimination procedure has the potential to provide a more relevant classification scheme to the research and treatment community. simplistic taxonomic approach, consider the fact that if a Mice were trained to differentiate the introceptive effects of the similar system was applied to other common drugs of abuse, trichloroethylene vapor from air using an operant procedure. then tobacco, crack cocaine, and marijuana would be treated Trichloroethylene is a chlorinated hydrocarbon solvent once used as a single category. Instead, other classes of abused drugs as an anesthetic as well as in glues and other consumer products.
    [Show full text]
  • Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modelling of Infant
    AAS Open Research AAS Open Research 2018, 1:16 Last updated: 21 MAY 2018 RESEARCH ARTICLE Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modelling of infant exposure to efavirenz through breastfeeding [version 1; referees: 1 approved with reservations] Adeniyi Olagunju 1,2, Rajith K. R. Rajoli 2, Shakir A. Atoyebi1, Saye Khoo2, Andrew Owen2, Marco Siccardi2 1Faculty of Pharmacy, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria 2Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GF, UK v1 First published: 14 May 2018, 1:16 (doi: 10.12688/aasopenres.12860.1) Open Peer Review Latest published: 14 May 2018, 1:16 (doi: 10.12688/aasopenres.12860.1) Referee Status: Abstract Background: Very little is known about the level of infant exposure to many drugs commonly used during breastfeeding. The aim of this study was to Invited Referees develop a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for predicting 1 infant exposure to maternal efavirenz through breastmilk. Methods: A breastfeeding PBPK model combining whole-body maternal and version 1 infant sub-models was constructed from drug-specific and system parameters published report affecting drug disposition using mathematical descriptions. The model was 14 May 2018 validated against published data on the pharmacokinetics of efavirenz in nursing mother-infant pairs. Further simulations were conducted to assess 1 Jeffrey W. Fisher, US Food and Drug exposure in the context of the 400 mg reduced dose of efavirenz as well as Administration, USA best- and worse-case scenarios. Results: The model adequately described efavirenz pharmacokinetics, with over 80% of observed data points (203 matched breast milk and plasma pairs) Discuss this article within the predictive interval.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 71, No. 34/Tuesday, February 21, 2006
    Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 21, 2006 / Notices 8859 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND of the Public Health Service Act to HUMAN SERVICES HUMAN SERVICES conduct directly or by grants or contracts, research, experiments, and Office of the National Coordinator; Office of the National Coordinator; demonstrations relating to occupational American Health Information American Health Information safety and health and to mine health. Community Chronic Care Workgroup Community Consumer Empowerment The BSC shall provide guidance to the Meeting Workgroup Meeting Director, NIOSH on research and prevention programs. Specifically, the ACTION: Announcement of meeting. ACTION: Announcement of meeting. board shall provide guidance on the institute’s research activities related to SUMMARY: SUMMARY: This notice announces the This notice announces the developing and evaluating hypotheses, third meeting of the American Health third meeting of the American Health Information Community Consumer systematically documenting findings Information Community Chronic Care and disseminating results. The board Workgroup in accordance with the Empowerment Workgroup in accordance with the Federal Advisory shall evaluate the degree to which the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. activities of NIOSH: (1) Conform to L. 92–463, 5 U.S.C., App.) Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463, 5 U.S.C., App.) appropriate scientific standards, (2) DATES: March 22, 2006 from 1 p.m. to address current, relevant needs, and (3) DATES: March 20, 2006 from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. produce intended results. 5 p.m. ADDRESSES: Hubert H. Humphrey Matters to be Discussed: Agenda items ADDRESSES: Hubert H. Humphrey Building (200 Independence Ave., SW., include a report from the Director, Building (200 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20201), Conference NIOSH; progress report by BSC working Washington, DC 20201), Conference Room 705A.
    [Show full text]
  • Methoxyflurane Toxicity: Historical Determination and Lessons For
    REVIEW ARTICLE Methoxyflurane toxicity: historical determination and lessons for modern patient and occupational exposure Serah J Allison, Paul D Docherty, Dirk Pons, J Geoffrey Chase ABSTRACT AIM: Historically methoxyflurane was used for anaesthesia. Evidence of nephrotoxicity led to abandonment of this application. Subsequently, methoxyflurane, in lower doses, has re-emerged as an analgesic agent, typically used via the Penthrox inhaler in the ambulance setting. We review the literature to consider patient and occupational risks for methoxyflurane. METHOD: Articles were located via PubMed, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, Anesthesiology journal and the Cochrane Library. RESULTS: Early studies investigated pharmacokinetics and considered the resulting effects to pose minimal risk. Pre-clinical rodent studies utilised a species not vulnerable to the nephrotoxic fluoride metabolite of methoxyflurane, so nephrotoxicity was not identified until almost a decade after its introduction, and was initially met with scepticism. Further evidence of nephrotoxicity led to abandonment of methoxyflurane use for anaesthesia. Subsequent research suggested there are additional risks potentially relevant to recurrent patient or occupational exposure. Specifically, greater than expected fluoride production after repeated low-dose exposure, increased fluoride production due to medication-caused hepatic enzyme induction, fluoride deposition in bone potentially acting as a slow-release fluoride compartment, which suggests a risk of skeletal fluorosis, and hepatotoxicity. Gestational risk is unclear. CONCLUSIONS: Methoxyflurane poses a potentially substantial health risk in high (anaesthetic) doses, and there are a number of pathways whereby repeated exposure to methoxyflurane in lower doses may pose a risk. Single analgesic doses in modern use generally appear safe for patients. However, the safety of recurrent patient or occupational healthcare-worker exposure has not been confirmed, and merits further investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Lectures Covering Concentrated Topics in Emergency Medicine (Tems)
    Lectures covering concentrated Topics in Emergency Medicine (TEMs) Section Week Title Topics Toxicology 007 External Decontamination and External decontamination Patient Stabilization Initial approach Airway management Patient control Drug interactions Anatomical distortion Advanced life support Alterations to standard therapy Prolonged resuscitation Organ donation Focused assessment History Vital signs Physical examination 008 Minimizing Absorption, Minimizing absorption Enhancing Elimination, and Syrup of ipecac Ancillary Testing Gastric lavage Activated charcoal Cathartics Whole-bowel irrigation Enhancing elimination Chelation Multidose charcoal Hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis Hemoperfusion Exchange transfusion Ancillary testing Toxicology screens Serum Urine Serum quantitation 009 Insecticides [17.01.20(b)] DEET Diquat and Paraquat Metaldehyde Methylbromide and other fumigants Nicotine Organophosphates [17.01.33] and carbamates Pyrethrins, pyrethroids, and organohalides 010 Rodenticides [17.01.20(c)] Anticoagulant [17.01.05] 4-hydroxycoumarins Indanediones Nonanticoagulant [excluding heavy metals] α-naphthylthiourea Boric acid Bromethalin Cholecalciferol Elemental phosphorus Fluroacetamide PNU Strychnine [17.01.37] 011 Hydrocarbons [17.01.23] Aliphatic Aromatic General Toluene Xylene Halogenated General Carbon tetrachloride Methylene chloride Trichloroethylene Pine Oil and Turpentine Polychlorinated biphenyls and related substances 012 Caustic & Corrosive Agents Ingestions Acid [17.01.14(a)] Alkali [17.01.14(b)] Other Disc batteries
    [Show full text]
  • Methoxyflurane (Penthrane): a Laboratory and Clinical Study
    METHOXYFLURANE (PENTHRANE)- A LABORATORY AND CLINICAL STUDY *1 GORDON M. WYANT, F.F.A.ti.C.S., CItUNG Ax CI-IANG,I M.D., D.P.It. ( TOIl. ), AND EMA.~UELV RA-PICAVOLI, M.D. ~IETHOXYFLITflANE is one in a series of fluorinated compounds which have been studied in recent years to determine their usefulness as anaesthetic agents. Of the many such substances synthetized only few have been sufficiently promising to warrant clinical trials in man; methoxyflurane is one of those. Chemical and Physical Properties MethoxTflurane is 2,2 dichloro-1, 1-d_ifluoro ethyl methyl ether, w4th the follow- ing s b-uctural structure: C1 F H H--C--C--O--C--H CI F H It is a clear, colourless liquid with a strong sweetish odour. Its boiling point is 104.8: C. at 760 mm. Hg pressure which is unusuallly high for an inhalation anaesthetic agent and it has a specific gravil.)' of 1.4924 at 25 ~ C. At room tempera- ture methoxyflurane is non-flammable in anaesthetic concentrations. Flash point i~ 6._~- C. and oil/x~.ater coefficient of 1 per cent methoxyflurane is 400. Depending upon the vaporizer, a maximum of 4 per cent methoxyflurane can be vaporized during clinical anaesthesia. EXPEBINIENTAL STUDY FoIluwing a number of pilot studies the effects of methoxyflurane were studied ~)n f/re healthy unpremedicated male volunteers using our previously published method of investigating the cardiovascular effects of a:naesthetic agents in man3 During a series of pilot studies it had become evident that in these fit un, premedicated individuals reduction with methoxyflurane-oxygen alone or with, nitrous oxide-o9 was di~cult and time consuming, and in, ~,)me instances impossible using a standard no.
    [Show full text]
  • BYSTOLIC Safely and Effectively
    HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION • Patients with severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh >B) These highlights do not include all the information needed to (4) use BYSTOLIC safely and effectively. See full prescribing • Hypersensitive to any component of this product (4) information for BYSTOLIC. -------------WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS---------- BYSTOLIC® (nebivolol) tablets, for oral use • Acute exacerbation of coronary artery disease upon cessation of therapy: Do not abruptly discontinue. (5.1) Initial U.S. Approval: 2007 • Diabetes: Monitor glucose as β-blockers may mask symptoms of hypoglycemia. (5.5) ------------RECENT MAJOR CHANGES------------------­ Indications and Usage (1.1) 12/2011 -----------------ADVERSE REACTIONS----------------- Most common adverse reactions (6.1): --------------INDICATIONS AND USAGE--------------- • Headache, fatigue BYSTOLIC is a beta-adrenergic blocking agent indicated for To report SUSPECTED ADVERSE REACTIONS, Contact the treatment of hypertension, to lower blood pressure. Forest Laboratories, Inc. at 1-800-678-1605 or FDA at Lowering blood pressure reduces the risk of fatal and nonfatal 1-800-FDA-1088 or www.fda.gov/medwatch. cardiovascular events, primarily strokes and myocardial infarctions. (1.1) ----------------DRUG INTERACTIONS------------------ • CYP2D6 enzyme inhibitors may increase nebivolol levels. ------------DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION---------- (7.1) Can be taken with and without food. Individualize to the • Reserpine or clonidine may produce excessive reduction needs of the patient and monitor during up-titration. (2) of sympathetic activity. (7.2) • Hypertension: Most patients start at 5 mg once daily. • Both digitalis glycosides and β-blockers slow Dose can be increased at 2-week intervals up to 40 mg. atrioventricular conduction and decrease heart rate. (2.1) Concomitant use can increase the risk of bradycardia.
    [Show full text]
  • Friendly Reference Document for Hazardous Waste Characteristics
    Hazardous Waste Characteristics A User-Friendly Reference Document October 2009 1 Table of Contents Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 3 Overview of the Hazardous Waste Identification Process .......................................................... 5 Characteristic Hazardous Wastes ................................................................................................ 5 Summary Chart............................................................................................................................ 7 General Hazardous Waste Resources.......................................................................................... 8 Regulations for the Identification of Hazardous Waste............................................................... 9 General Resources for Hazardous Waste Characteristics.......................................................... 12 Ignitability..................................................................................................................................... 12 Regulations for Ignitable Liquids.............................................................................................. 13 Regulations for Ignitable Solids ................................................................................................ 14 Regulations for Ignitable Compressed Gas ............................................................................... 14 Related Resources for Ignitable
    [Show full text]