Design of Multifunctional Body Panels for Conflicting Structural And
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Design of Multifunctional Body Panels for Conflicting Structural and Acoustic Requirements in Automotive Applications CHRISTOPHER J. CAMERON Doctoral Thesis Stockholm, Sweden 2011 KTH School of Engineering Sciences Department of Aeronautical and Vehicle Engineering TRITA-AVE2011-16 Teknikringen 8 ISSN 1651-7660 SE-100 44 Stockholm ISBN 978-91-7415-904-2 SWEDEN Akademisk avhandling som med tillstånd av Kungl Tekniska högskolan framlägges till of- fentlig granskning för avläggande av teknologie doktorsexamen i Lättkonstruktioner Tors- dagen den 31 mars 2011, klockan 10:00 i sal F3, Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan, Lindst- edtsvägen 26, Stockholm. c Christopher J. Cameron, Feb 2011 Tryck: E-Print AB iii Abstract Over the past century, the automobile has become an integral part of society, with vast increases in safety, refinement, and complexity, but most unfortunately in mass. The trend of increasing mass cannot be maintained in the face of increasingly stringent regulations on fuel consumption and emissions. The body of work within this thesis exists to help the vehicle industry to take a step forward in producing vehicles for the future in a sustainable manner in terms of both economic and ecological costs. In particular, the fundamentally conflicting require- ments of low weight and high stiffness in a structure which should have good acoustic performance is addressed. An iterative five step design method based on the concepts of multifunctionality and multidisciplinary engineering is proposed to address the problem, and explained with a case study. In the first step of the process, the necessary functional requirements of the system are evaluated. Focus is placed on the overall system behavior and diverted from sub- problems. For the case study presented, the functional requirements included: struc- tural stiffness for various loading scenarios, mass efficiency, acoustic absorption, vi- brational damping, protecting from the elements, durability of the external surfaces, and elements of styling. In the second step of the process, the performance requirements of the system were established. This involved a thorough literature survey to establish the state of the art, a rigorous testing program, and an assessment of numerical models and tools to evaluate the performance metrics. In the third step of the process, a concept to fulfil requirements is proposed. Here, a multi-layered, multi-functional panel using composite materials, and polymer foams with varying structural and acoustic properties was proposed. In the fourth step of the process, a method of refinement of the concept is proposed. Numerical tools and parameterized models were used to optimize the three dimensional topology of the panel,material properties, and dimensions of the layers in a stepwise manner to simultaneously address the structural and acoustic performance. In the fifth and final step of the process, the final result and effectiveness of the method used to achieve it is examined. Both the tools used and the final result in itself should be examined. In the case study the process is repeated several times with increasing degrees of complexity and success in achieving the overall design objectives. In addition to the design method, the concept of a multifunctional body panel is defined and developed and a considerable body of knowledge and understanding is presented. Variations in core topology, materials used, stacking sequence of layers, effects of perforations, and air gaps within the structure are examined and their effects on per- formance are explored and discussed. The concept shows promise in reducing vehicle weight while maintaining the structural and acoustic performance necessary in the con- text of sustainable vehicle development. v Acknowledgements The work presented in this thesis has been carried out within the Centre for ECO2 Vehicle Design at the Department of Aeronautical and Vehicle Engineering, KTH. The financial support provided by Vinnova, KTH, and the industrial partners, in particular Saab Auto- mobile AB, is gratefully acknowledged. Special thanks to Mr. Sven Rahmqvist and Dr. Per-Olof Sturesson from Saab for providing valuable insight and experience from industry. Many people at KTH have contributed to this thesis in one way of another. To my supervi- sors, Professor Peter Görannson, and Assistant Professor Per Wennhage, I can only humbly tip my hat and say thank you for your invaluable guidance, input, and discussions over the past 4.5 years, and for giving me the opportunity to do my PhD in the first place. It has been one of the most challenging, frustrating, enlightening, enraging, surprising, inspiring, and fulfilling tasks I have ever set out to accomplish. I consider myself fortunate to have been given the chance to do it, and thankful that I had such great supervisors! I would also like to thank Eleonora Lind Nordgren from MWL, who has been an integral part of a large amount of work performed in the included papers. It has been a pleasure working with you, and I think that the challenges of working in a collaborative manner have only strengthened the value of the work. I would also like to thank Associate Professor Leping Feng for his help in the early measurement work. To everyone in the lightweight structures group, I would also like to extend my thanks for creating an environment that has made the past 4.5 years fly by and taught me a lot. Specifically I would like to thank Dr. Markus Kaufmann who made the first couple years a lot more fun, and Mr. Fredrik Stig who has been a great office mate and ski-building partner......even if he does use a mac. To my family who has always encouraged and supported me, and constantly wondered when I would be finished with "school", I want to thank you all immensely. You’ve all been a source of inspiration and strength at some point. Finally, I want to thank my wonderful loving wife Camilla, for putting up with me in general, but especially for helping me keep a rough grasp on my sanity through the craziest bits of the trip to creating this little book. Your love and support made this PhD possible. Tack Älskling! Stockholm, February 2011 vii Dissertation This doctoral thesis is based on an introduction to the area of research and the following appended papers: Paper I Christopher J. Cameron, Per Wennhage, and Peter Göransson. Prediction of nvh behav- ior of trimmed body components in the frequency range 100–500hz. Applied Acoustics, 71(8):708 – 721, 2010. Paper II Christopher J. Cameron, Per Wennhage, Peter Göransson, and Sven Rhamqvist. Structural– acoustic design of a multi–functional sandwich panel in an automotive context. Journal of Sandwich Structures and Materials,12(6):684–708, 2010, doi:10.1177 /1099636209359845. Paper III Christopher J. Cameron, Eleonora Lind, Per Wennhage, and Peter Göransson. Proposal of a methodology for multidisciplinary design of multifunctional vehicle structures including an acoustic sensitivity study. Int.J. Vehicle Structures & Systems, (1–3):1–13, 2009. Paper IV Christopher J. Cameron, Eleonora Lind Nordgren, Per Wennhage, and Peter Göransson. Material Property Steered Structural and Acoustic Optimization of a Multifunctional Ve- hicle Body Panel. Manuscript, submitted to ASME Journal of Mechanical Design. viii Paper V Christopher J. Cameron, Eleonora Lind Nordgren, Per Wennhage, and Peter Göransson. A Design Method using Topology, Property, and Size Optimization to Balance Structural and Acoustic Performance of Sandwich Panels for Vehicle Applications. Manuscript, submit- ted to Computers and Structures Portions of this thesis have also been presented as follows: Christopher J. Cameron, Per Wennhage, Peter Göransson, and Sven Rhamqvist. Structural- Acoustic Design of a Multi-Functional Body Panel for Automotive Applications, In Pro- ceedings of the 8th International Conference on Sandwich Structures (ICSS8), Porto, Por- tugul, 6-8 May 2008. Christopher J. Cameron, Eleonora Lind, Per Wennhage, and Peter Göransson, Material Property Steered Optimization of a Multifunctional Body Panel to Structural and Acoustic Constraints, In Proceedings of ICCM-17, 17th International Conference on Composite Materials, Edinburgh, Scotland, 27-31 July 2009. Christopher J. Cameron, Per Wennhage, and Peter Göransson. Multi-Scale Structural Acoustic Optimization of a Multi-Functional Vehicle Body Panel. In Proceedings of the Twenty Second Nordic Seminar on Computational Mechanics, Aalborg, Denmark, 22-23 October 2009. Christopher J. Cameron, Eleonora Lind Nordgren, Per Wennhage, and Peter Göransson. Balancing Structural and Acoustic Performance of Sandwich Panels for Vehicle Applica- tions with Topology, Property, and Size Optimization. In Proceedings of ACCM 7, The Seventh Asian-Australasian Conference on Composite Materials. 15-18 November 2010. Contents I Introduction 1 1 Background and Context 3 1.1 Historical Vehicle Development Trends . 3 2 Vehicle Form and Functionality 6 2.1 Vehicle Structures . 6 2.2 Noise Vibration and Harshness . 7 2.3 Alternative Materials . 8 3 Tools for Vehicle Design 12 3.1 Structural Design . 12 3.2 NVH tools and methods . 12 3.3 Optimization . 13 4 The Multifunctional and Multidisciplinary Design Paradigm 16 4.1 An Iterative Design Process . 16 4.2 The Case Study . 19 5 Conclusions and Summary 50 6 Future Work 53 Bibliography 54 II Appended papers 61 ix Part I Introduction 1 Introduction 3 1 Background and Context 1.1 Historical Vehicle Development Trends The automobile has come a long way since 1886 when Karl Benz filed a patent for a vehicle with gas powered drive. Henry Ford brought the car to the general public with the model T and the concept of mass production. While different manufacturers would likely disagree as to what is the single most important quality in producing a vehicle, it is likely they would all agree that a policy of continuous development of ones products is an absolute necessity. Continuous improvement of areas such as safety, comfort, handling, performance, and even convenience, have not been achieved without a certain cost. Perhaps the most tangible cost is the growing mass of the vehicles produced.