DOCSLIB.ORG

Bays Community Coalition (Bacc) Comprises Community Representatives from Suburbs Surrounding the Bays - Annandale, Balmain, Glebe, Pyrmont, Rozelle, White Bay &Ultimo

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bays Community Coalition (Bacc) Comprises Community Representatives from Suburbs Surrounding the Bays - Annandale, Balmain, Glebe, Pyrmont, Rozelle, White Bay &Ultimo BaCC’s Submission – March 2017 Bays Community Coalition (BaCC) comprises community representatives from suburbs surrounding the Bays - Annandale, Balmain, Glebe, Pyrmont, Rozelle, White Bay &Ultimo. Subject: GSC’s Draft Central District Plan - November 2016 BaCC’s Submission – 31st March 2017 Page 1 BaCC’s Submission – March 2017 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 4 2. Preamble ......................................................................................................................................... 5 3. Draft Plan – Comments, Recommendations & Questions ............................................................ 5 1. Chief Commissioner’s Foreword ................................................................................................ 5 2. Our Vision ................................................................................................................................... 6 3. Productive City ........................................................................................................................... 7 4. Liveable City ................................................................................................................................ 8 5. The Liveable Framework .......................................................................................................... 10 6. The Central District’s People .................................................................................................... 11 7. Projects Under Investigation.................................................................................................... 11 8. Facilitate Integrated Infrastructure Planning .......................................................................... 11 9. Plan to Meet Demand for School Facilities ............................................................................. 12 10. Figure 4-11 and 4-12 ............................................................................................................. 13 11. Delivery Sydney’s Green Grid .............................................................................................. 13 12. Long Term Vision - Sydney’s Green Grid ............................................................................. 14 13. Sydney’s Walking Future / Cycling Future Programs .......................................................... 14 14. General ................................................................................................................................. 15 4. Education ...................................................................................................................................... 16 1. General ..................................................................................................................................... 16 2. Planning Data ........................................................................................................................... 16 3. Planning Controls ..................................................................................................................... 17 4. Funds for Schools ..................................................................................................................... 17 5. HEALTH ......................................................................................................................................... 17 1. General ..................................................................................................................................... 17 2. Acute Hospital Facility Increases ............................................................................................. 18 3. Emergency Service Facilities .................................................................................................... 19 5. Aged Care Facilities .................................................................................................................. 20 6. Responsibility for Health Service Planning .............................................................................. 21 6. AFFORDABLE HOUSING ................................................................................................................ 26 1. General ..................................................................................................................................... 26 2. Existing Affordable Housing Regulations. ............................................................................... 26 3. References ................................................................................................................................ 27 4. Sydney Alliance Submission ..................................................................................................... 28 Page 2 BaCC’s Submission – March 2017 7. SPORTING FACILITIES ................................................................................................................... 28 1. General ..................................................................................................................................... 28 2. Open Space Vs Active Recreation Space ................................................................................. 29 8. TRANSPORT .................................................................................................................................. 29 1. Planning New Metro Services .................................................................................................. 29 2. Connecting People and Places ................................................................................................. 30 3. Visionary Planning .................................................................................................................... 30 4. Enhanced Walking and Cycling Connections ........................................................................... 31 5. A Sustainable and Connected City ........................................................................................... 31 9. POLLUTION ................................................................................................................................... 33 1. History and Current .................................................................................................................. 33 2. White Bay Cruise Terminal ....................................................................................................... 34 10. HERITAGE .................................................................................................................................. 35 1. Environmental Heritage ........................................................................................................... 35 2. Arts and Culture ....................................................................................................................... 35 3. Glebe Island Bridge .................................................................................................................. 36 4. Existing Heritage Networks ...................................................................................................... 36 Page 3 BaCC’s Submission – March 2017 1. Executive Summary The Bays Community Coalition (BaCC) response follows and covers a series of questions and comments which the Draft Central District Plan has raised. BaCC seeks clarification(s) to GSC’s Draft Plan so that the final version is a landmark achievement for establishing a successful combination of development planning and social infrastructure in NSW. A summary of key points in our submission follows: 1. BaCC members offer expertise on social infrastructure such as Education, Health, Affordable Housing, Sporting Fields, Transport, Pollution and Heritage. These insights explore and reflect on current practices and highlight existing shortfalls. The CSD Plan will not be a strategy for Sydney until it is integrated with a strong social infrastructure plan developed by department stakeholders in proper consultation with the community. 2. Our experience is that statistical information used by government departments in “assumptions” which underpin planning projections often do not reflect community’s experience and expectations. The statistical information provided in this Draft Plan needs to be independently scrutinised to ensure its accuracy. 3. Our experience with planning in Sydney is that residential development precedes limited retrofitting of social infrastructure by the Government, not developers. The community wants to see a Strategic Master Plan for our District that includes social infrastructure so we can visualize what the big picture will look like over the next 10, 20 and 30 years (+). 4. Central District communities have had a lot of exposure to community consultation planning processes over many years. BaCC wants to see in GSC’s Central District Plan a description of how communities will be genuinely and respectfully engaged in the planning process. 5. BaCC wants to see in GSC’s Central District Plan a greater vision for NSW. If we don’t consider a much bigger picture in this Plan we will continue to stretch our housing and social infrastructure well beyond its capacity. 6. BaCC expresses concern throughout this Draft Plan re; vague “motherhood” statements. The lack of detail allows opportunities for development to focus on housing without consideration for social infrastructure. Evidence based
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 109. M4-M5 EIS Vol 2I App T Groundwater Part 1
    M4-M5 Link Environmental Impact Statement August 2017 Appendix T Volume 2I Since finalisation of the Environmental Impact Statement, the project has been declared by Ministerial Order to be State significant infrastructure and critical State significant infrastructure under sections 115U (4) and 115V of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. The Ministerial Order also amended Schedule 5 of State Environmental Planning Policy (State and Regional Development) 2011. The project remains subject to assessment under Part 5.1 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and requires the approval of the Minister for Planning. WestConnex speaks your language Greek Learn more by visiting µ www.westconnex.com.au/yourlanguage www.westconnex.com.au/yourlanguage to watch project videos in your language and read more about WestConnex. If you need an interpreter, call the Translating WestConnex. µ , µ 131 450. and Interpreting Service on 131 450. Italian Arabic Per saperne di più visiti il sito www.westconnex.com.au/yourlanguage www.westconnex.com.au/yourlanguage, dove potrà guardare i video del progetto in lingua italiana e trovare maggiori informazioni su WestConnex. Se ha bisogno di un interprete, contatti il Servizio di Traduzione ed Interpretariato (Translating ł ł .131 450 and Interpreting Service) al numero 131 450. Chinese Korean 了解詳情請上網 www.westconnex.com.au/yourlanguage 를 방문하여한국어로 www.westconnex.com.au/yourlanguage觀看(普通話) 된 프로젝트 비디오를 보고 WestConnex 에 관해 읽고 배우세요. 視頻, 並 查閱有關WestConnex的更多訊息。如需要傳譯員請 통역이 필요하시면 번역 및 통역 서비스 131 450 (TIS) 으로 전화 。。 撥電話傳譯服務 131 450 하십시오. Hindi Vietnamese : Hãy tìm hi u thêm và vi ng trang m ng www.westconnex.com.au/yourlanguage ( ) www.westconnex.com.au/yourlanguage xem phim nh b ng Vi t ng v công trình này và c thêm v WestConnex.
    [Show full text]
  • Sydney Harbour a Systematic Review of the Science 2014
    Sydney Harbour A systematic review of the science 2014 Sydney Institute of Marine Science Technical Report The Sydney Harbour Research Program © Sydney Institute of Marine Science, 2014 This publication is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material provided that the wording is reproduced exactly, the source is acknowledged, and the copyright, update address and disclaimer notice are retained. Disclaimer The authors of this report are members of the Sydney Harbour Research Program at the Sydney Institute of Marine Science and represent various universities, research institutions and government agencies. The views presented in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of The Sydney Institute of Marine Science or the authors other affiliated institutions listed below. This report is a review of other literature written by third parties. Neither the Sydney Institute of Marine Science or the affiliated institutions take responsibility for the accuracy, currency, reliability, and correctness of any information included in this report provided in third party sources. Recommended Citation Hedge L.H., Johnston E.L., Ayoung S.T., Birch G.F., Booth D.J., Creese R.G., Doblin M.A., Figueira W.F., Gribben P.E., Hutchings P.A., Mayer Pinto M, Marzinelli E.M., Pritchard T.R., Roughan M., Steinberg P.D., 2013, Sydney Harbour: A systematic review of the science, Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Sydney, Australia. National Library of Australia Cataloging-in-Publication entry ISBN: 978-0-646-91493-0 Publisher: The Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Available on the internet from www.sims.org.au For further information please contact: SIMS, Building 19, Chowder Bay Road, Mosman NSW 2088 Australia T: +61 2 9435 4600 F: +61 2 9969 8664 www.sims.org.au ABN 84117222063 Cover Photo | Mike Banert North Head The light was changing every minute.
    [Show full text]
  • Sydney Harbour Superyacht Guidelines
    Sydney Harbour superyacht guidelines Guidelines for Masters operating Superyachts on Sydney Harbour Contents Executive Summary 1 Qualifications and registration 9 Port procedures 2 Boat licences and certificates of competency 9 Directions for navigation 2 Registration of vessels 9 Directions and regulations to be observed 2 Protected animals 10 Required charts 2 Approach distances 10 Port services 2 Speed 10 Pilotage requirements 2 Approach directions 10 Wind and weather 3 Action if a marine mammal approaches 11 Port Authority of NSW Vessel Traffic Service 3 Communications 11 Pilot boarding place 3 VHF channels 11 Sydney Harbour – general considerations 3 Important contact details 11 General 3 Useful websites 12 Speed limits 3 Photographs 13 Speed restricted areas 4 Anzac Bridge 13 Conduct within Sydney Harbour 7 Rozelle Bay Superyacht Marina 13 Prohibited areas for general navigation 7 Campbells Cove 14 General 7 Sydney Cove – Circular Quay 15 Restricted access areas 7 Fort Denison 15 Collision or incident reports 8 Garden Island Naval Base 15 Berthing at commercial wharves 8 Walsh Bay 16 Pollution, nuisance or danger 8 Sydney Harbour Bridge 17 Marine Pollution Act 1987 8 Jones Bay Wharf, Pyrmont 17 Pump-out facilities 8 Kirribilli Point 17 Garbage 9 Anzac Bridge 18 Causing of nuisance or danger 9 Glebe Island Bridge 18 Farm Cove 18 Wind frequency analyses 19 FRONT COVER PHOTO: ANDREA FRANCOLINI Executive Summary Welcome to Sydney. The aim of these guidelines is to assist superyacht masters Superyachts are free to enter and move around with their preparations for a visit to Sydney Harbour and to Sydney Harbour subject to compliance with the provide a reference document during the visit.
    [Show full text]
  • Act No. 108, 1902. an Act to Authorise the Raising of a Loan for the Public Service of the State, and for Other Purposes
    Act No. 108, 1902. An Act to authorise the raising of a Loan for the Public Service of the State, and for other purposes. [22nd December, 1902.] E it enacted by the King's Most Excellent Majesty, by and with B the advice and consent of the Legislative Council and Legisla­ tive Assembly of New South Wales in Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows :— 1. It shall be lawful for the Governor to raise by the issue of Debentures or Inscribed Stock, secured upon the Consolidated Revenue of the State, and bearing interest at a rate not exceeding four per centum per annum, such sums of money not exceeding in the whole the the sum of Three millions and seventy thousand four hundred and seventy-two pounds, as are respectively set against the following Public Works and Services, that is to say :— PERMANENT AND REPRODUCTIVE WORKS. HOSPITALS— Country Hospitals—Towards erection of New Buildings to meet the demands for increased accommodation ... ... ... £10,000 0 0 North Shore Hospital, towards New Building—further sum ... 10,000 0 0 £20,000 0 0 GOVERNMENT ASYLUMS FOR THE INFIRM AND DESTITUTE—Towards erection of Buildings, &c 20,000 0 0 INEBRIATES HOME—Towards erection of Buildings, &c.; improvements to Island, &c.— further sum 5,000 0 0 FIRE BRIGADES—Sites for, and erection of, Branch Stations under control of Metro­ politan Fire Brigade Board 25,000 0 0 SYDNEY HARBOUR TRUST—Towards construction of new Berthing Accommodation and new Jetties, Sheds, &c.; new Punts for Dredges ; general reconstruction of Wharfs and Jetties ; erection of Office accommodation ; and generally for the improvement of the Port 50,000 0 0 GOVERNMENT PRINTER—-For purchase of extra Machinery and Plant ..
    [Show full text]
  • Contaminant Chemistry and Toxicity of Sediments in Sydney Harbour, Australia: Spatial Extent and Chemistry–Toxicity Relationships
    Vol. 363: 71–87, 2008 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published July 15 doi: 10.3354/meps07445 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Contaminant chemistry and toxicity of sediments in Sydney Harbour, Australia: spatial extent and chemistry–toxicity relationships Gavin F. Birch1,*, Stephanie McCready1, Edward R. Long2, Stuart S. Taylor1, 3, Gina Spyrakis1 1School of Geosciences, Environmental Geology Group, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, 2006, Australia 2ERL Environmental, 3691 Cole Road South, Salem, Oregon 97306, USA 3URS, 116 Miller St., North Sydney, New South Wales, 2060, Australia ABSTRACT: The spatial distribution of chemical contamination and toxicity of surficial sediments in Sydney Harbour, Australia, was investigated in a 3-tiered, hierarchical approach. An initial chemical investigation throughout the entire estuary (Stage 1) indicated wide ranges and different spatial patterns in sediment chemical concentrations. Sediment quality guidelines (SQGs) were used as a preliminary estimate of possible toxicity in Stage 2 of the investigation. Assessment of chemical mixtures indicated that sediments in a small part (~2%) of the harbour had the highest probability of being toxic (~75%), whereas sediment in almost 25% of the port was estimated to have an inter- mediate (~50%) probability of being toxic. The SQG assessment in Stage 2 enabled careful stratifica- tion of the harbour into areas with different toxicity risks, reducing cost and time commitments in the final tier of assessment. The spatial survey carried out in Stage 3 involved concurrent chemical and ecotoxicological analyses. In this final stage, the degree of response in tests of amphipod survival in whole sediment samples, as well as in tests of microbial metabolism (Microtox©) and sea urchin egg fertilisation and embryo development in pore waters, generally increased with increasing chemical concentrations.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridge Types in NSW Historical Overviews 2006
    Bridge Types in NSW Historical overviews 2006 These historical overviews of bridge types in NSW are extracts compiled from bridge population studies commissioned by RTA Environment Branch. CONTENTS Section Page 1. Masonry Bridges 1 2. Timber Beam Bridges 12 3. Timber Truss Bridges 25 4. Pre-1930 Metal Bridges 57 5. Concrete Beam Bridges 75 6. Concrete Slab and Arch Bridges 101 Masonry Bridges Heritage Study of Masonry Bridges in NSW 2005 1 Historical Overview of Bridge Types in NSW: Extract from the Study of Masonry Bridges in NSW HISTORICAL BACKGROUND TO MASONRY BRIDGES IN NSW 1.1 History of early bridges constructed in NSW Bridges constructed prior to the 1830s were relatively simple forms. The majority of these were timber structures, with the occasional use of stone piers. The first bridge constructed in NSW was built in 1788. The bridge was a simple timber bridge constructed over the Tank Stream, near what is today the intersection of George and Bridge Streets in the Central Business District of Sydney. Soon after it was washed away and needed to be replaced. The first "permanent" bridge in NSW was this bridge's successor. This was a masonry and timber arch bridge with a span of 24 feet erected in 1803 (Figure 1.1). However this was not a triumph of colonial bridge engineering, as it collapsed after only three years' service. It took a further five years for the bridge to be rebuilt in an improved form. The contractor who undertook this work received payment of 660 gallons of spirits, this being an alternative currency in the Colony at the time (Main Roads, 1950: 37) Figure 1.1 “View of Sydney from The Rocks, 1803”, by John Lancashire (Dixson Galleries, SLNSW).
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial and Warehouse Buildings Study Report
    REPORT ON CITY OF SYDNEY INDUSTRIAL & WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS HERITAGE STUDY FOR THE CITY OF SYDNEY OCTOBER 2014 FINAL VOLUME 1 Eveready batteries, 1937 (Source: Source: SLNSW hood_08774h) Joseph Lucas, (Aust.) Pty Ltd Shea's Creek 2013 (Source: City Plan Heritage) (Source: Building: Light Engineering, Dec 24 1955) VOLUME 1 CITY OF SYDNEY INDUSTRIAL & WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS HERITAGE STUDY FINAL REPORT Job No/ Description Prepared By/ Reviewed by Approved by Document of Issue Date Project Director No Manager/Director FS & KD 13-070 Draft 22/01/2014 KD/24/01/2014 13-070 Final Draft KD/17/04/2014 KD/22/04/2014 13-070 Final Draft 2 KD/13/06/2014 KD/16/06/2014 13-070 Final KD/03/09/2014 KD/05/09/2014 13-070 Final 2 KD/13/10/2014 KD/13/10/2014 Name: Kerime Danis Date: 13/10/2014 Note: This document is preliminary unless it is approved by the Director of City Plan Heritage CITY PLAN HERITAGE FINAL 1 OCTOBER 2014 / H-13070 VOLUME 1 CITY OF SYDNEY INDUSTRIAL & WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS HERITAGE STUDY FINAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME 1 – REPORT Executive summary ........................................................................................................................ 4 1.0 About this study................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 6 1.2 Purpose .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Contextual Analysis and Urban Design Objectives
    Rozelle Interchange Urban Design and Landscape Plan Contextual Analysis and Urban Design Objectives Artists impression: Pedestrian view along Victoria Road Caption(Landscape - Image shown description at full maturity and is indicative only). 03 White Bay Power Station Urban Design Objectives 3 Contextual analysis 3.1 Contextual analysis Local context WestConnex will extend from the M4 Motorway at The Rozelle Interchange will be a predominately Parramatta to Sydney Airport and the M5 underground motorway interchange with entry and Motorway, re-shaping the way people move exit points that connect to the wider transport through Sydney and generating urban renewal network at City West Link, Iron Cove and Anzac opportunities along the way. It will provide the Bridge. critical link between the M4 and M5, completing Sydney’s motorway network. Iron Cove and Rozelle Rail Yards sit on and are adjacent to disconnected urban environments. While the character varies along the route, the These conditions are the result of the historically WestConnex will be sensitively integrated into the typical approach to building large individual road built and natural environments to reconnect and systems which disconnect suburbs and greatly strengthen local communities and enhance the reduce the connectivity and amenity of sustainable form, function, character and liveability of Sydney. modes of transport such as cycling and walking. Rather than adding to the existing disconnection, An analysis of the Project corridor was undertaken the Project will provide increased
    [Show full text]
  • 7 a Short Geological and Environmental History of the Sydney
    View metadata,citationandsimilarpapersatcore.ac.uk effect on floods and droughts in Australia', Climatic change, vol. 25, pp. 289–317. 7 Wilby R L, 2005. 'Uncertainty in water resource model parameters used for climate change impact assessment', Hydrological Processes, vol. 19, pp. 3201–3219. Young P, 2003. 'Top-down and data-based mechanistic modelling of rainfall-flow dynamics at the catchment scale', Hydrological Processes, A short geological and environmental history vol. 17, pp. 2195–2217. of the Sydney estuary, Australia Young W, Brandis K & Kingsford R, 2006. 'Modelling monthly streamflows in two Australian dryland rivers: matching model complexity to spatial scale and data availability', Journal of Hydrology, Gavin Birch vol. 331, pp. 242–256. Zhang L, Dawes W R & Walker G R, 2001. 'Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes a catchment scale', Water Abstract Resources Research, vol. 37, pp. 701–708. Zhang L, Walker G R & Fleming M, 2002. 'Surface water balance for Sydney is blessed with one of the most beautiful harbours in the world. recharge estimation', CSIRO publishing, Collingwood, Victoria. However, like many large, capital ports world-wide, this environment has been exposed to relentless stress due to a rapidly increasing population density and extensive residential, commercial and industrial expansion. In this chapter, we explain why the coastal zone is such an important environment, especially for the people of Australia, and describe changes to the Sydney estuary as an example of environmental transformation due to anthropogenic pressure. The geologic development of the Sydney estuary is briefly traced, showing how the feature was eroded into the Hawkesbury Sandstone, mainly during low sea levels of the glacial periods.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction & History
    Archaeological Investigation Darling Quarter (formerly Darling Walk), Darling Harbour, Sydney Volume 1.1: Main Report Interpretation of the foreshore environment prior to development in the 1820s. A Cryerhall Report to Lend Lease Development December 2013 i Executive Summary The wharf facilities of Darling Harbour were crucial in the economic development and growth of Sydney during the 19th century. The Darling Quarter development provided a unique opportunity to excavate and record archaeological remains of this former 19th-century waterfront. In 1788 the site was once almost entirely below the high tide mark and through a number of phases of reclamation between the early and mid-19th century, it was transformed into large waterfront properties complete with timber wharf structures. The land was subsequently developed for industrial, commercial and residential use. Barker’s mill and the PN Russell & Co Engineering Works are two significant 19th-century industries associated with the site. The Darling Quarter site was one of the largest urban archaeological excavations in Australia. It took eight months between 2008 and 2010 to complete and resulted in the retrieval of a considerably large quantity of artefacts and archaeological data. Following the fieldwork, the post- excavation cataloguing, research, analysis and reporting was undertaken in stages between 2009 and 2013. This report presents the results of the archaeological investigation in six volumes. Main Archaeological Findings The original natural environment consisted of large intertidal sand flat abutting a rocky shoreline. Below the sands, a shell bed containing cockle, oyster, whelk and other shell species common to intertidal sand flats had accumulated over thousands of years.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 5 Customer Induction and Fact Sheet
    Appendix 5 Customer induction and fact sheet Welcome to the Sydney Superyacht Marina, Rozelle Bay. Rozelle Bay offers deep water24/7 access and a sheltered, calm water environment. The predominant wind direction in summer is North-East, where the Anzac Bridge offers good protection. In winter we experience South-Easterly and Westerly winds which sometimes can whip-up a bit and make berthing challenging. These SE’ly and W’ly wind conditions generally don’t last long and settle around sunset. The Bay also accommodates a number of other commercial and recreational users including charter boat and barge operators, rowing clubs (including the famous Sydney Dragons). The Marina is considered “private property” and access to the marina is for boat owners (including nominated crew) and their guests only. Marina operating hours are from 8am to 5pm, 7 days a week. The general public is welcome along the foreshore, but not on the marina pontoons. Rozelle Bay is a No-Wash / 4 knots zone, and it is a requirement that powered vessels give way to passive recreational craft at all times. Especially Superyachts must keep a proper look-out when arriving and departing at the marina. The marina notifies marina clients of the weather conditions and the anticipated level of recreational use within Rozelle Bay via our notice board. On this board you’ll also find information about upcoming marina events, aquatic events and other notices that are relevant. The Glebe Island Bridge (1903) shall remain in the open position for the passage of vessels. Yacht owners should approach the Bridge with extreme caution.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology of Pyrmont Peninsula 1788 - 2008
    Transformations: Ecology of Pyrmont peninsula 1788 - 2008 John Broadbent Transformations: Ecology of Pyrmont peninsula 1788 - 2008 John Broadbent Sydney, 2010. Ecology of Pyrmont peninsula iii Executive summary City Council’s ‘Sustainable Sydney 2030’ initiative ‘is a vision for the sustainable development of the City for the next 20 years and beyond’. It has a largely anthropocentric basis, that is ‘viewing and interpreting everything in terms of human experience and values’(Macquarie Dictionary, 2005). The perspective taken here is that Council’s initiative, vital though it is, should be underpinned by an ecocentric ethic to succeed. This latter was defined by Aldo Leopold in 1949, 60 years ago, as ‘a philosophy that recognizes[sic] that the ecosphere, rather than any individual organism[notably humans] is the source and support of all life and as such advises a holistic and eco-centric approach to government, industry, and individual’(http://dictionary.babylon.com). Some relevant considerations are set out in Part 1: General Introduction. In this report, Pyrmont peninsula - that is the communities of Pyrmont and Ultimo – is considered as a microcosm of the City of Sydney, indeed of urban areas globally. An extensive series of early views of the peninsula are presented to help the reader better visualise this place as it was early in European settlement (Part 2: Early views of Pyrmont peninsula). The physical geography of Pyrmont peninsula has been transformed since European settlement, and Part 3: Physical geography of Pyrmont peninsula describes the geology, soils, topography, shoreline and drainage as they would most likely have appeared to the first Europeans to set foot there.
    [Show full text]