INTERVENTIONS in CONTEMPORARY URBAN SITUATIONS Kees Christiaanse

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

INTERVENTIONS in CONTEMPORARY URBAN SITUATIONS Kees Christiaanse The 5th International Conference of the International Forum on Urbanism (IFoU) 2011 National University of Singapore, Department of Architecture Global Visions: Risks and Opportunities for the Urban Planet INTERVENTIONS IN CONTEMPORARY URBAN SITUATIONS Kees Christiaanse The above title contains two words that play a key-role for understanding the operation of urban design and planning as a pro-active force with a concrete impact. “Intervention” indicates that influence on urbanization in general is exerted by targeted actions within a limited field, and “Situation” indicates that any given urban condition is a transient and dynamic balance between the forces of the moment. Today, there exists a general consensus about the fact that the city does not let itself be designed but merely steered in a limited way. The production of built environment takes place according to precise rules, consisting of natural processes and man-made conventions and regulations, of which economic drivers and consequently the stocks and flows of people, goods and information are predominant. However, many examples of big interventions, I call them “grands projèts”, can be found in the history of urbanization, showing that the conscious exertion of influence by man on his built environment can reach considerable degrees of control. We cannot only see this in Hausmann‟s Paris or the European high-speed rail network, but also in the self-conscious development of an island like Singapore (Fig 1). Fig 1 Singapore, Santosa construction Site 1 It is not easy to conceive a theoretical model for contemporary urbanization - a reduced representation of a far more complex constellation of systems - as a framework for understanding. Formerly, such a model used to evolve from the history of models of urbanization and their consequent extrapolations. Today however, forms of urbanization are so complex - and at the same time global and specific - that no past model of reading the city can help us. As a result, we are increasingly dependent on fieldwork observations, as well as statistical and visual data acquisition of urbanization‟s causes and effects, in order to sketch a useful framework of understanding. If we look for example at a satellite photo of the earth by night, the cities of Western Europe light up like a galaxy of stars (Fig 2). In Europe, there are hundreds of mid-sized cities, Fig 2 Europe-map of Europe-nightlights-satellites-woodley wonderworks with populations ranging from 100,000 to 1 million inhabitants. They form a web with an average mesh opening of approximately 100 km. Within this web, 300 million people live in a relatively high-quality living environment. This condition is unique for Europe. In other parts of the world, cities are larger, lie farther apart, or form concentrated agglomerations in an otherwise thinly populated landscape. In Asia are some constellations with somewhat comparable distances, like on the island of Java or in part of Japan, their respective conditions however are radically different. There are some large metropolises in Europe – such as London, Berlin, Paris, and Madrid. However, mid-sized cities are the norm and make it justifiable to refer to a typical „European urban condition‟. These mid-sized cities and their regional networks form the basis for Europe‟s urban culture and economy. They have developed into an extended „carpet metropolis‟ (fig 3) and are functioning as a comprehensive global city that is Fig 3 Carpet Metropolis - nueterlings reasonably understood in economic and logistical terms. The understanding of how to influence the course of their development is however less clear. Polycentric agglomerations such as the Randstad (the urban belt formded by Amsterdam, Rotterdam, The Hague Utrecht in the Netherlands) and the German Ruhr area (Dusseldorf, Duisburg, Essen, Dortmund, Cologne) are often regarded as „global cities‟, comparable with London or Paris. However, an approach in which the generic European city is regarded as forming a cell within an organism on the scale of Europe as a whole, including its rural surface, provides a more clarifying model. From this perspective, European cities constitute an integrated, resilient organism that continues to function when shifts in gravitation take place or certain cells and connections drop out. The organism consists not only of the core cities themselves. Almost every city in Europe forms an agglomeration with physical and social spheres of influence that extend beyond its political and administrative borders. (Fig 4) Fig 4 Hollow Core, Rem Koolhaas The 30 million inhabitants of the region which Rem Koolhaas named „Hollow Core‟ – the (sub)urbanized area between the agglomerations of Randstad, the Flemish Diamond (Antwerp, Brussels, Gent) and the Ruhr area – live and work in an urban landscape set between core cities and are responsible for a considerable proportion of the region‟s economic production and consumption. Within an hour, residents of Hollow Core can reach four international airports, eight intercity railway stations, sixteen universities, thirty-two international sport venues, and sixty-four shopping malls, while at the same time they live in low-density neighbourhoods in a fairly green environment. More or less the same applies to the whole of Western Europe, and it represents an unparalleled quality of life. Nowhere else in the world is everything so accessible, while at the same time so „remote‟. Within this landscape, the mid-sized European cities function as symbols of regional identity, centres of culture, knowledge and education and as transport hubs for goods and people. Their peripheries overlap with those of other cities disregarding municipal, regional and national borders and form sequences that extend across hundreds of kilometers. They are not so much competitors against each other, but rather are mutually indispensable and complementary. Just as the city centre needs the periphery, these cities cannot exist without each other and the network connecting them. In the fields of economics and the social sciences, this is widely accepted as common knowledge – witness the extensive literature on the global economy, import and export flows, production and consumption patterns, and migratory movements.(Fig 5) Fig 5 Systems of Central Places, Walter Christaller, 1993 In the early thirties, the German geographer Walter Christaller was one of the first to construct an urbanization model for this condition. He illustrated his concept of the “System of Central Places” with beautiful diagrams of the interrelations and hierarchies between southern German towns, represented by circles of influence. These circles were later reflected in the famous “Potatoe-Plan” for Greater London from 1943 (Fig 6) by Sir Patrick Abercrombie. Both read the urban landscape as a hierarchical topology of centralities. They showed for the first time that these “centralities” operate complementary in their topological relations and that they are the main drivers of urbanization. The urban intensity and amenities of these central places extend beyond the local scale, becoming significant hubs, influencing spatial, economic, social and cultural development on a regional, national or even global scale. Largely differing in character, size and impact, they tend to form a hierarchical network, a topology of places, constituting the city as a manifold entity, not only in terms of identity and orientation, but also of economy, community and culture. Fig 6 Greater London, Patrick Ambercrombie, 1943 From a historical perspective, these centralities include the „city-centre“, the „market“, the „business district“, the „railway-station“, the „government quarter“, the „shopping- mall“or the „stock-exchange“. Today however, this topology of centralities has been extended with phenomena like the „creative neighbourhood“, the „airport city“, the „loft-quarter“, the „theme-park“, „the museum island“or the „science campus“. Centralities constitute the key-areas to steer intervention. Urban designers may be aware of these indissoluble connections and mutual dependencies. However, they are still quite perplexed regarding the means of controlling spatial development, and there is a sense that there are no adequate tools available with which to exert influence. This feeling of impotence is the result of well-known factors such as the fragmentation of administrative borders, the distinct and contrary competences of various authorities, the fact that urbanization processes tend to follow the dynamics of the economy (which is even less controllable), the inability of politicians to achieve consensus on a larger scale, and the resilience of structures that have resulted from long periods of historical growth. The urban landscape has become apparently chaotic, with radically different developments appearing to coexist in arbitrary ways. Essentially, however, this apparently chaotic urban landscape is extremely regulated. Almost everything that is built has been designed according to precise rules and regulations – political decisions, zoning plans, building codes, property rights, feasibility studies, financing models and programmatic scenarios. This hyper-order is reinforced by the fact that physically speaking, urban planning – apart from a few exceptions – is a fairly two-dimensional affair. Everything is neatly arranged side by side on the surface of the earth: the boundaries of individual plots do not overlap, buildings stand next to and not on top of each other, each plot has access
Recommended publications
  • Competitive Campuses’ Is an International Conference Hosted by the NTNU in Trondheim in Conjunction with ETH Zürich and Sasaki Associates in Boston
    International Conference Trondheim, Norway, June 13-15, 2007 Exploiting the European Advantage through Planning Strategy and Design Competitive The Challenge for European Universities CampusesCampuses WWelcomeelceomlce ome ‘Competitive Campuses’ is an international conference hosted by the NTNU in Trondheim in conjunction with ETH Zürich and Sasaki Associates in Boston. It offers a platform on which architects and planners can exchange critical and visionary perspectives on campus developments with representatives from the political, economic and social sectors. The conference is oriented towards specialists in the field of architecture, urban design and planning, real estate and knowledge management, and is open to the public. The conference focuses on university campuses, from the revitalization of mono-functional campuses to new concepts that stimulate interaction and integration with the city. Today we experience the simultaneous emergence of two contradictory trends: on the one hand the trend to create projects that reconcile and reintegrate large-scale institutions with the surrounding urban tissue into open, communicative structures, on the other hand the trend towards ‘gated-ness’, the increasing seclusion under the influence of efficiency, economy and (social) security. That these trends are not entirely counterproductive and sometimes even are complementary is shown in several contemporary campus concepts. What kind of spatial organization promotes internal knowledge transfer and social interaction while simultaneously integrating with the surrounding urban environment? Which strategies are needed to create sustainable centers of knowledge that are flexible enough to respond to the fast changing demands of industry and society? These are but a few of the questions we hope to address in the ‘Competitive Campuses’ conference.
    [Show full text]
  • Tobias Armborst – the Dream of a Lifestyle: Marketing Master Planned Communities in America • Kenny Cupers – Cities in Search of the User
    program 1 Thursday November 11 2010 De Nieuwe Bibliotheek Almere (Public Library of Almere) Stadhuisplein 101, 1315 XC Almere, the Netherlands 09h00 doors open, registration & coffee 09h30 introduction by Michelle Provoost, director INTI opening by René Peeters, alderman City of Almere 10h15 theme 1: Participation and Community Power moderator Michelle Provoost • Tobias Armborst – The Dream of a Lifestyle: Marketing Master Planned Communities in America • Kenny Cupers – Cities in search of the user 11h45 theme 2: The Architect and the Process • Kieran Long (Evening Standard) interviews Kees Christiaanse (KCAP) and Nathalie de Vries (MVRDV) on the role of the Architect in the development of New Towns in Russia and Asia 13h00 lunch at Centre for Architecture CASLa, Weerwaterplein 3, 1324 EE Almere 14h30 theme 3: New Towns as Political Instrument moderator: Wouter Vanstiphout • Zvi Efrat – About Politics and Architecture of New Towns in Israel • Azadeh Mashayekhi – Revisiting Iranian New Towns • Dan Handel – Grid and Revelation: Cities of Zion in the American West • Vincent Lacovara – Specific Flexibility in Place-making - or - The Law of Unforseen Planning 17h00 drinks and dinner at restaurant Waterfront Esplanade 10, 1315 TA Almere (Schouwburg of Almere) 2 Friday 12 November 2010 Schouwburg of Almere (Theatre of Almere) Esplanade 10, 1315 TA Almere, the Netherlands 09h00 doors open, registration & coffee 09h30 Introduction by Michelle Provoost, director INTI 09h40 theme 4: Left and Right in Urban Planning moderator Felix Rottenberg • Adri
    [Show full text]
  • Uberbau Portfolio
    CV Thomas Stellmach Dipl. Ing. Architect, Urbanist Uberbau partner Registered Architect, Architektenkammer Berlin, Germany Nationality: German, *30.5.1975 in Freiburg Languages: German, English, Spanish, French, Dutch EDUCATION 2003 Dipl. Ing. Architecture at TU Berlin: Montjuic, Barcelona. Graduation cum Laude. Instructed by Kees Christiaanse & Werner Sewing. 1999–2000 Erasmus scholarship at the Universitat Politècnica de Catalunia. Catedra Mies v. d. Rohe with Wiel Arets. 1997–1999 Philosophy at Freie Universität Berlin. PROFESSIONAL 7.2012–now Consultant for the Aga Khan Awards for Architecture (AKAA). Estab- lishing a methodology to award urban planning projects. 10.2011–now Expert Consultant for the Urban Planning and Design Branch of UN-Habitat in Nairobi, KE. Achieving Sustainable Urban Development. • Pilot Projects Manila, Philippines. 2012. • Kigali and Intermediate Cities strategic planning projects, Rwanda. 2012. • Masterplan Amman, Jordan. 2012. • Development Corridor Nacala–Nampula, Mozambique. 2011. • Planning workshop Kisumu, Kenya. 2011. • Contemporary Planning Projects, Good practice and the state of planning report. 2012. • Urban development & planning trends, the state of planning report. 2011. 7.2009–now Founding Partner. Uberbau architecture & urbanism. Berlin, DE. • The Street Live. 2012. Co-curatorship of Wereld Witte de With Art Festival Rotterdam. Commission. Stichting Witte de With. • ITB Austria. Trade show stand design. Commission. • Private House in Mgairyah. A private home. Commission. • Al–Adhamiya. Urban Transformation for a historic quarter in Bagh- dad, IQ. Invited Competition. • Paris Periphery North–East. Urban vision for five of the most pre- carious communes in the agglomeration of Paris, FR. Commission. • Paris Bercy–Charenton. Masterplan for an infrastructural node in Paris, FR. Competition. • Street Life. Reinventing Hybrid Infrastructures in the Netherlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Gary Mckeone Programme Directors, St George's House David
    Gary McKeone Programme Directors, St George’s House David Beurle Chief Executive Officer Future iQ Dr Jonathan Woetzel Senior Partner, and Director - McKinsey & Company, Asia Saskia Sassen Professor of Sociology, Columbia University and Co-Chair The Committee of Global Thought, Columbia University Minister Pascal Smet Minister of the Government of the Brussels- Capital Region, Responsible for Mobility and Public Works Professor Kees Christiaanse Future Cities Laboratory Stephan Herbst Technical General Manager Hydrogen Toyota Motor Europe Aarti Tandon CEO, Smart City Expo Atlanta Professor Renato Flôres Director of the International Intelligence Unit, Rio de Janeiro Meghan Mills Global Director, Strategy & Operations, Government & Public Sector; Global Co- Leader, Future Cities, EY Josephine Yilan Liu Founding Partner Urban Future Global Conference Andy Lipkis Tree People Dr Margaret Loper Chief Scientist, Georgia Institute of Technology Jack Robbins Partner, Director of Urban Design FXCollaborative Architects Dr Igor Calzada, MBA, FeRSA Research Fellow at Cardiff University, WISERD; Senior Research Affiliate at the University of Oxford, Future of Cities and Urban Transformations ESRC programmes; Anders L. Pettersson Executive Director, Civil Rights Defenders James Bernard Head of Corporate Sales, DMCC, Dubai Dan Burden Director of Innovation and Inspiration Blue Zones LLC Henry Gordon-Smith Founder and Managing Director Agritecture Consulting Paul Lindop Founder, SmartRural Co-op Russell Dalgleish Managing Partner, Exolta Capital Partners
    [Show full text]
  • Projects - Last Update January 2018 – P
    STAR s t r a t e g i e s + a r c h i t e c t u r e Projects - Last Update January 2018 – p. 1 PROJECTS Ilot 3H – FIRST PRIZE Collective housing (35% social housing) + commerces + public spaces Competition: February 2015 1st phase (ateliers): March-December 2015 Developing phase: March 2016 – on going Ivry-sur-Seine, Grand Paris, France Surface: 23110 m² Budget: 38 millions € (estimation) Clients : Sogeprom Habitat (Towers 1-2-3-5), Sadev94 (Tower 4) L’intérieur de la Métropole – ON GOING Sociological study of the different types of household and home practices in Ille de France June 2015 - On going Ille de France, France Surface: - Budget: N/A Clients : Self-initiated Le Cabanon – ON GOING Guest apartment + spa November 2014 - On going Rotterdam, The Netherlands Surface/Volume: 7 m²/21m3 Private client Budget: 20.000 € Chambre avec vue – FINALIST Housing Competition for the “LOT F” at Chapelle International August-October 2014 Invited Competition Paris, France 13 650 m² (net.) Client: RIVP Budget: 27 000 000 € La Légende du Grand Paris ou Comment Paris est devenu Grand Research/Parable realized for the mission “Système métropolitain” for the AIGP March – On going Research Grand Paris, France Surface: - STAR strategies + architecture Kipstraat 7B 3011 RR Rotterdam The Netherlands t: 0031-102135630 - fax 0031-104132362 [email protected] www.st-ar.nl STAR s t r a t e g i e s + a r c h i t e c t u r e Projects - Last Update January 2018 – p. 2 Client: AIGP (Atelier International du Grand Paris) “Co-Résidence: Habiter en Grand” Research/project on alternative housing September 2012 - On going Research Surface: - Grand Paris, France Client: AIGP (Atelier International du Grand Paris) ZAC Gare Ardoines Urban plan for the renewal of the south of Les Ardoines July 2012 – September 2014 Commission after winning competition: Dialogue Competitif Vitry-sur Seine, Région Ile-de-France, France Surface: 49 ha Client: EPA ORSA Urban Renewal Study in Roubaix, France – FINALIST Competitive Dialogue about the urban renewal of the Pile neighborhood in Roubaix, France.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Trans Formation
    URBAN TRANS FORMATION Editors: Ilka & Andreas Ruby Editorial Coordination: Elena Schütz Graphic Design: Leonard Streich Text Editor: April Elizabeth Lamm Proof Reader: Uta Hoffmann Transcripts: Anna Mauch, Julian Schubert A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from the Library of Congress, Washington D.C., USA. Bibliographic information published by Die Deutsche Bibliothek. Die Deutsche Bibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliographie; detailed bibliographic data is available in the internet at http: //dnb.ddb.de This work is subject to copyright. All right are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, re-use of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in other ways, and storage in data banks. For any kind of use, permission of the copyright holder must be obtained. © 2008 Ruby Press, Berlin © 2008 Holcim Foundation for Sustainable Construction, Zürich © The contributors for their texts and images http: //www.ruby-press.com http: //www.holcimfoundation.org Printed in Germany Distributed by Idea Books, Amsterdam ISBN 978-3-00-024878-8 CONTENT BETWEEN GLOBAL AND LOCAL Introduction: 88 The Global-Local Nexus and the New Urban Order Amer Moustafa Re: Doing Dubai 90 Wes Jones Sustainable Difference 110 Simon Hubacher Caribbean Strips: Tourism in the Caribbean 116 Juan Alfonso Zapata and Supersudaca Permanent Visitors 124 Foreword 10 Donald L. Bates Ilka & Andreas Ruby Mallorca: Island in Progress 128 14
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Architecture
    Review Department of Architecture SUSTAINABILITY @ AR We, a grouping of students, lecturers, and resear- 1 chers, are the Sustainability Research Group of the Department of Architecture at the TUM. Together we wish to make our Department and University more Preface sustainable. Various subgroups deal with the chal- lenges and opportunities that are specific to our field, launch concrete projects, and help shape our Department from the bottom up . Dear Students, Alumni, Partners, and Friends, Change is the only constant. Quite unexpectedly, the COVID-19 pandemic transformed our patterns of collaboration, Would you also like to shape things? [email protected] the ways we teach, and our private lives. Our students and colleagues have successfully tackled the challenges with 92% 7.800 m² patience, much passion, and many additional working hours. of the students surveyed find the topic of environ- of plotter paper Meanwhile, the number of applicants for our study programs has continued to rise; for this winter term there were mental sustainability important (42%) or very more than 1,600 applications by prospective students—more than ever before. We achieved the 26th position in important (50%) the QS World University Ranking by Subject 2020 and 6th position in the Best Architecture Masters Ranking (BAM), which underlines the high attractiveness of our location. For these reasons, our Department of Architecture 24.000 ml continues to develop at high speed—even at this peculiar time. 90% of plotter ink The current issue of REVIEW proudly presents a selective overview of our activities of the past few months. of the employees surveyed find the topic are consumed of sustainability important (25%) or very important in one semester As part of the Venture Lab Initiative of TUM and its affiliated institute UnternehmerTUM, the mission of the “Built Environment” Venture Lab is to become a top platform for young companies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Copenhagen UN Climate Conference Did Not Achieve A
    International Conference Urban Futures 2050 Berlin, May 26-27, 2011 Short Biographies Susanne Achilles-Kuhnhardt, visionSgate Berlin As a business manager holding a PhD, Susanne Achilles-Kuhnhardt has been active as a consultant and entrepreneur in various industries. Her expertise ranges from telecommunications and media to services, manufacturing, and her current activities in the field of renewable energies. She focuses on the development of management, vision, strategy, and sales. As head of visionSgate management consulting, supporting and developing projects and companies in the field of renewable energies are of particular importance to her. Abebayehu Assefa, Addis Ababa University Abebayehu Assefa, born in 1953, did his BSc in Mechanical Engineering at the Addis Ababa University and MSc in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology – UMIST, UK. He did his PhD (Dr.-Ing.) degree in Mechanical Engineering at the Technical University of Aachen. He has been the head of the Energy Center of the Faculty of Technology, Addis Ababa University since 2007. He has worked at the University since 1994 where he lectures and publishes regularly. His key interests are e.g. computer-aided analysis and design of thermal systems, renewable energy conversion, power plant engineering and computer modeling of mechanical systems. Assefa is also a member of the German Exchange Service (DAAD) and the Academic Commission of the Faculty of Technology. He is an Executive Committee member of the Ethiopian Society of Mechanical Engineers (ESME). Tina Bär, Heinrich-Böll-Foundation Brandenburg Tina Bär studied Political Science, Public Management and Environmental Education at University of Potsdam.
    [Show full text]
  • Essays Shenzhen
    06.02.15 12:41 12:41 06.02.15 06.02.15 1 1 150206_Global_Schindler_Award_Cover.indd 150206_Global_Schindler_Award_Cover.indd artner artner P P cademic cademic A A artner artner P P cademic cademic A A r r e e artn artn P P ic ic m m e e d d Aca Aca Academic Partner Academic GLOBAL SCHINDLER GLO GLOBAL 2015 SCHINDLER AWARD AWARD 5 1 0 B 2015 AL SCHI SHENZHEN PROJECTS ARD 2 W ND A LER LER A ND W ARD 2 ESSAYS SHENZHEN AL SCHI 2015 B 0 1 5 AWARD GLO SCHINDLER GLOBAL AAcaAcademiccademicdemic AP PartnPartnercademicartnerer Partner 150206_Global_Schindler_Award_Cover.indd 1 06.02.15 12:41 artner P cademic A GLOBAL SCHINDLER GLO AWARD B 2015 AL SCHI SHENZHEN ESSAYS ND Edited by LER ETH Zurich Kees Christiaanse Fabienne Hoelzel Myriam Perret Dimitri Kron A W Journalist + Consultant Jessica Bridger ARD 2 Schindler Group Silvio Napoli Andrea Murer Neil Runcieman 0 1 5 AAcaAcademiccademicdemic P PartnPartnerartnerer 150206_Global_Schindler_Award_Cover.indd 1 06.02.15 12:41 Global Schindler Award 2015 | A 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS – PART A ESSAYS Foreword – Essays 6 Silvio Napoli Introduction – In Search of Approaches to 8 Contemporary Urban Intervention Challenges Fabienne Hoelzel Accessibility in Cities: Transport and Urban Form 14 Philipp Rode Rocking the Roadblock 26 Alexander Erath Future Infrastructure 32 Darryl Chen Preservation of the Public 40 Jiang Feng, interviewed by Jessica Bridger Urban Design Models for Urban Megaprojects 46 in a Global World Eirini Kasioumi Undermining the Authority 56 Ting Chen Chinese Urbanization through the Lens of Da Lang 66 Linda Vlassenrood Games with Frontiers 72 Kazys Varnelis Afterword – Essays The Elevator: From Social Ambition to Urban Necessity 80 Neil Runcieman People 84 6 A | Foreword – Silvio Napoli FOREWORD – ESSAYS Silvio Napoli In many rapidly expanding cities of the developing world, mass migration has led to urban sprawl, slums, pollution, and gridlock.
    [Show full text]
  • Imagining the Dutch Polder Landscape: a Design by OMA from 1986
    Journal of Landscape Architecture ISSN: 1862-6033 (Print) 2164-604X (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rjla20 Imagining the Dutch polder landscape: a design by OMA from 1986 Christophe Van Gerrewey To cite this article: Christophe Van Gerrewey (2015) Imagining the Dutch polder landscape: a design by OMA from 1986, Journal of Landscape Architecture, 10:3, 20-27, DOI: 10.1080/18626033.2015.1094900 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2015.1094900 Published online: 23 Sep 2015. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 3 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rjla20 Download by: [EPFL Bibliothèque] Date: 07 October 2015, At: 00:38 Imagining the Dutch polder landscape: a design by OMA from 1986 Christophe Van Gerrewey École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Switzerland Abstract Introduction: OMA and the Haarlemmermeerpolder In 1986, the Office for Metropolitan Architecture (OMA) / Rem Koolhaas In 1986, Rem Koolhaas and OMA made a design for the Haarlemmer- created a landscape design for the Haarlemmermeerpolder, located between meerpolder, a large site in the heart of the Netherlands, with a complex Amsterdam, Leiden, and Haarlem. They were invited by urbanists and and emblematic history. This polder, almost 200 square kilometres in size, planners wanting to denounce the urban policy in the 1980s. Dutch spatial was, until the nineteenth century, the largest Dutch lake, nicknamed the Downloaded by [EPFL Bibliothèque] at 00:38 07 October 2015 development, once characterized by reclamation and bold city planning, ‘Waterwolf’due to its wild character.
    [Show full text]
  • Leading Thinkers, Researchers and Planners Ruurd Gietema
    Leading Thinkers, Researchers and Planners Arturo Corpuz Arturo G. Corpuz is Senior Vice President and member of the Management Committee of Ayala Land, Inc., a property developer based in the Philippines. He received his baccalaureate degree in Architecture from the University of the Philippines and his masteral and doctoral degrees in urban and regional planning from Cornell University, where he was a recipient of the American Planning Association-American Institute of Certified Planners Most Outstanding Student Award, a Cornell Sage Graduate Fellowship, and a John D and Catherine T MacArthur Foundation Fellowship. Dr. Corpuz also served as Lecturer at the Department of City and Regional Planning of Cornell. He has also received an award from the Philippine Professional Regulations Commission as the Most Outstanding Environmental Planner, and from the University of the Philippines School of Urban and Regional Planning as Most Outstanding Teacher. He is a former President of the Philippine Economic Society, and a Fellow of the Foundation for Economic Freedom and the Philippine Institute of Environmental Planning. Among others, Dr. Corpuz has served as Consultant and Adviser of the National Economic Development Authority of the Republic of the Philippines, the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank. Ruurd Gietema Ruurd Gietema is an urban planner. He has been a partner of KCAP since 2002. Ruurd studied Architecture and Urban Planning at the Technical University in Delft (TUD). KCAP is an international design studio for architecture and urban planning founded in 1989 by Kees Christiaanse. With KCAP Ruurd pioneered a multi-disciplinary approach to complex design issues. This is expressed in KCAP projects such as Rotterdam Wijnhaven Island, Hamburg Hafencity and Perm Strategic Masterplan.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 29 Unique Houses
    SCHÖRGHUBER PORTAL 29 INFORMATION FOR ARCHITECTS FROM HÖRMANN AND SCHÖRGHUBER Unique houses ASTOC & Kees Christiaanse, Graber und Steiger, Lorenzen Architekten, Rainer Roth Architekt 20 10 20 24 16 24 2 CONTENTS EDITORIAL 04 ABOUT THE TOPIC Dear Readers, Representation – more illusion than reality? 10 “RIVERSIDE” IN BREMEN, GERMANY Perhaps you have already noticed: PORTAL is now four Carsten Lorenzen, Copenhagen, Denmark pages thicker than it was previously. “Schörghuber Spezialtüren KG”, which has been part of the Hörmann 16 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING IN SPEICHER, GERMANY group since 1988, is now a co-editor of PORTAL and will Rainer Roth Architekt, Meckel, Germany be even more strongly represented in future issues. Also new to the publication is the “Recently in ...” section. 20 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING IN AESCH, Here architects from around the world tell us about SWITZERLAND hotspots in their hometown, which haven’t made it into Graber und Steiger, Lucerne, Switzerland any guidebooks yet. The topic of this issue is dedicated to residential construction. To start off, Rudolf Gräf looks 24 “Kristall” IN HAMBURG, GERMANY at the magnificent Romani buildings, which are often ASTOC, Cologne, Germany known by their politically incorrect name of “Gypsy Kees Christiaanse, Rotterdam, Netherlands Palaces”. The buildings, which are reminiscent of a mixture of a Chinese pagoda and an Indian Bollywood 30 CORPORATE NEWS facade, are often more illusions than reality and serve Hörmann in detail more for representative purposes. More reserved in Schörghuber in detail comparison is the architecture from Carsten Lorenzen, who has newly interpreted the principle of the “Bremen 35 RECENTLY IN ... House” in the Stadtwerder district of Bremen.
    [Show full text]