DOCSLIB.ORG

Applicant Responses to Relevant Representations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Applicant Responses to Relevant Representations Riverside Energy Park Applicant responses to Relevant Representations VOLUME NUMBER: PLANNING INSPECTORATE REFERENCE NUMBER: EN010093 DOCUMENT REFERENCE: 08 8.02.03 May 2019 Revision 0 (Deadline 2) Planning Act 2008 | Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 Riverside Energy Park Applicant Responses to Relevant Representations CONTENTS 0 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 5 1 Theme Responses ............................................................................................ 7 1.1 Air Quality (TR-001) ............................................................................. 12 1.2 Terrestrial Biodiversity (TR-003) .......................................................... 24 1.3 Ground Conditions (TR-009) ................................................................ 39 1.4 Need for the scheme (TR-013) ............................................................ 43 1.5 Noise and Vibration (TR-014) .............................................................. 48 1.6 Public Consultation (TR-016) ............................................................... 54 1.7 Safety (TR-018) ................................................................................... 58 1.8 Socio-economics (TR- 019) ................................................................. 61 1.9 Source of Waste (TR-20) ..................................................................... 65 1.11 Construction Traffic (TR-022)............................................................... 66 1.12 Operational Road and River Transportation (TR-023) ......................... 70 1.13 TVIA (TR-024) ...................................................................................... 75 1.14 Carbon (TR-025) .................................................................................. 83 2 Local Authorities ............................................................................................. 86 2.1 London Borough of Tower Hamlets (RR-047) ...................................... 86 2.2 Be First on behalf of London Borough of Barking and Dagenham (RR-059) ......................................................................................................... 88 2.3 London Borough of Havering (RR-064) ............................................... 89 2.4 Dartford Borough Council (RR-072) ..................................................... 98 2.5 Greater London Authority (RR-075) ..................................................... 99 2.6 Kent County Council (RR-079)........................................................... 107 2.7 Royal Borough of Greenwich (RR-084) ............................................. 108 2.8 London Borough of Bexley ................................................................. 110 3 Statutory Organisations ............................................................................... 111 3.1 The Coal Authority (RR-003) ............................................................. 111 3.2 East London Waste Authority (RR-034) ............................................. 112 3.3 Knights Solicitors on behalf of S Wernick & Sons (Holdings) Limited (RR-041) .......................................................................................... 117 3.4 Knights Solicitors on behalf of Wernick Event Hire Limited (RR- 042) 124 3.5 NATS LTD (RR-049) .......................................................................... 131 3.6 Public Health England (RR-067) ........................................................ 132 Riverside Energy Park Applicant Responses to Relevant Representations 3.7 Environment Agency (RR-074) .......................................................... 133 3.8 Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) on behalf of Network Rail Infrastructure Limited (RR-082) .................................................................... 138 3.9 Winckworth Sherwood LLP on behalf of Port of London Authority (RR-083) ....................................................................................................... 140 3.10 Eversheds Sutherland (International) LLP on behalf of Thames Water Utilities Limited (TWUL) (RR-086) ...................................................... 141 3.11 Transport for London (RR-087) .......................................................... 152 4 Non-statutory Organisation ......................................................................... 157 4.1 Dartford and Crayford Creek Restoration Trust (RR-002) .................. 157 4.2 London Power Networks plc (RR-004) ............................................... 159 4.3 South Eastern Power Networks plc (RR-005) .................................... 160 4.4 United Kingdom Without Incineration Network (UKWIN) (RR-006) .... 161 4.5 National Grid Electricity Transmission Plc (RR-008) .......................... 176 4.6 Maritime and Coastguard Agency (RR-027) ...................................... 177 4.7 Bexley Natural Environment Forum (RR-033).................................... 179 4.8 Essex Wildlife Trust (RR-045) ............................................................ 188 4.9 Bexley-Greenwich Environment Alliance (RR-050) ............................ 190 4.10 Cory Environmental Limited (RR-060) ............................................... 194 4.11 London First (RR-080) ....................................................................... 196 5 Member of the Public / Business ................................................................. 198 5.1 Maz Mohammed (RR-001) ................................................................ 198 5.2 Knights Solicitors on behalf of SAS Depot Limited (RR-028) ............. 200 5.3 Western Riverside Waste Authority (RR-029) .................................... 208 5.4 Knights Solicitors on behalf of S Wernick & Sons (Holdings) Limited (RR-041) .......................................................................................... 213 5.5 Knights Solicitors on behalf of Wernick Event Hire Limited (RR-042) ....................................................................................................... 219 5.6 Ingrebourne Valley Limited (RR-053) ................................................. 226 5.8 Spring Law on behalf of Creek Side Developments (Kent) Limited (RR-061) ....................................................................................................... 228 5.9 Tozers LLP on behalf of Landsul Limited (RR-063) ........................... 230 5.10 Belvedere Community Forum (RR-043) ............................................. 234 5.11 Newell Projects Ltd on behalf of ARRIVA London Ltd (RR-055) ........ 235 5.12 Tozers LLP on behalf of Munster Joinery (U.K.) Limited (RR-065) .... 244 5.13 JMW Planning Solutions Ltd on behalf of Prologis UK Ltd (RR-066) ....................................................................................................... 248 Riverside Energy Park Applicant Responses to Relevant Representations 5.14 Riverside Resource Recovery Limited (RR-068) ............................... 251 5.15 John Cruddas MP (RR-036)............................................................... 253 5.16 Sir David Evennett MP (RR-052) ....................................................... 258 5.17 Teresa Pearce MP (RR-054) ............................................................. 261 Tables Table 1.1: Table of Theme Responses .................................................................................. 7 Table 1.4: Summary of Representations .............................................................................. 39 Table 1.5: Summary of Representations .............................................................................. 43 Table 1.5: Summary of Representations .............................................................................. 48 Table 1.6: Summary of Representations .............................................................................. 54 Table 1.7: Summary of Representations .............................................................................. 58 Table 1.8: Summary of Representations ................................................................... 61 Table 1.9: Summary of Representation ..................................................................... 66 Table 1.10: Summary of Representation ................................................................... 71 Table 1.11: Summary of Representations ................................................................. 75 Table 1.12: Summary of Representations ................................................................. 83 Table 4.1: Local Authority Collected Waste incineration and recycling rates across four London boroughs, 2017/18 (an update of the table in UKWIN RR at paragraph 80) ..................................................................................... 170 Table 4.2: An update of UKWIN estimate of London incineration capacity (tables at UK WIN 55) ............................................................................................... 172 Table 4.3: An update on UKWIN potential for incineration over capacity (tables at UKWIN 65 ................................................................................................. 173 Glossary .................................................................................................................. 175 Figures Figure 1: Extract from LWSA (Annex A, PINS Reference APP-103) of Figure 6.1 - Scenarios 1, 2a, 3b and 4 of the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bexley Labour Group Submission 2
    Bexley Labour Group submission 2 (B) Overview of proposed arrangements This submission has sought to deliver electoral equality throughout the pattern, forming wards around a principle of -/+5% from the variance. Nineteen of the twenty-three wards achieve this principle; fourteen proposed wards are within 4%, nine are within 3%, five are within 2% and three are within 1% of the average electoral quotient. Four wards are above the self-imposed - /+5% quotient and where that is the case it has been justified in the description of the proposed wards. The Local Government Boundary Commission for England has indicated that it is minded to recommend that the council size be forty-five and this proposal reflects that. Bexley is a residential suburban borough and many of the towns and neighbourhoods have been built around railway stations and they remain and provide a hub with shops and amenities. Where appropriate and where railway lines can be easily traversed the proposed arrangements reflect that. The submission considers the A2 which runs east-west across the centre of the borough to be an obstacle and no proposed wards cross it. The ward description sets out the defined borders of the proposed wards and deals with the three principles of i) electoral equality, ii) community identity and iii) effective and convenient local government. (C) Description of wards 1. Thamesmead East The proposed ward is defined to the north by the River Thames, to the east by Norman Road (beyond the Crossness engines and nature reserve), to the south by the North Kent railway line and to the west by the border with the Royal Borough of Greenwich.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission Policies Map Technical Paper
    www.bexley.gov.uk Submission Policies Map Technical Paper Proposed changes to the policies map Part 1 of 2 Page 1 - 65 Contents Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Section 1: Overview of changes to spatial designations ............................................................................................. 2 Section 2: Detailed changes to spatial designations ..................................................................................................... 8 Metropolitan Green Belt .................................................................................................................................................. 8 Metropolitan Open Land ................................................................................................................................................ 14 Urban Open Space ............................................................................................................................................................ 21 South East London Green Chain ................................................................................................................................... 63 Town Centres, Neighbourhood Centres and Small Parades ..................................................................................... 66 Thames Policy Area ...............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Outdoor Sports Facilities
    SECTION 9 – OUTDOOR SPORT FACILITIES Outdoor sports facilities Definition 9.1 PPG17 guidance includes both indoor and outdoor sports facilities. This section considers the provision of outdoor sports facilities across Bexley. Indoor facilities will be considered separately as an annex to this study. 9.2 Outdoor sports facilities is a wide-ranging category of open space which includes both natural and artificial surfaces for sport and recreation that are either publicly or privately owned. 9.3 Facilities included within this category are: • playing pitches (including football, rugby, cricket, hockey) • synthetic turf pitches • tennis courts • bowling greens • athletics tracks • golf courses • outdoor netball courts. 9.4 Outdoor sports facilities are a focal point of a local community, functioning as a recreational and amenity resource in addition to a formal sports facility. This is particularly true of pitches, which often have a secondary function of a local dog walking and kickabout area. Likewise, amenity areas sites often provide informal sporting opportunities. 9.5 The public parks in Bexley are key locations in the infrastructure of outdoor sports provision in Bexley, and many of the largest playing pitch sites are situated within the boundaries of parks. This further emphasises the overlap between outdoor sports facilities and other informal open spaces. In many instances, pitches operate as informal areas for recreation for the majority of the week. 9.6 Private facilities/clubs play a crucial role in the provision of outdoor sports facilities in Bexley and several large clubs provide opportunities for player progression from a young age through to veterans. 9.7 While this PPG17 study provides a strategic overview of existing provision of outdoor sports facilities and future priorities across Bexley, in light of the demand led nature of outdoor sports facilities, specific studies should be carried out relating to each type of facility.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 7 – Provision for Children
    SECTION 7 – PROVISION FOR CHILDREN Provision for children Definition 7.1 PPG17 defines provision for children and young people as one of its eight green space typologies and states that the broad objective of provision for children and young people is to ensure that they have opportunities to interact with their peers and learn social and movement skills within their home environment. At the same time, they must not create nuisance for other residents or appear threatening to passers- by. 7.2 The importance of appropriate provision for children and young people is gaining an increasingly high profile on the national agenda. The importance of ensuring appropriate provision for children is reinforced in the Bexley children and young people’s plan, which places an emphasis on positive involvement and partnership working with children and young people. 7.3 The Supplementary Planning Document to the London Plan states, “ all children and young people should be able to play within local neighbourhoods and have safe and attractive play spaces within walking distance of their homes. For older children and young people, having opportunities to enjoy and develop their own cultural and recreational pursuits is equally important’. Localised provision for both children and young people is perceived to be particularly important in the context of the dense, highly urbanised London environment. 7.4 Play and informal recreation is also addressed in a number of the Mayor’s crosscutting strategies. The overarching strategy is set out in Making London Better for All Children and Young People, but a number of other strategies are relevant, including the Mayor’s Transport, Culture and Childcare Strategies and Walking Plan for London.
    [Show full text]
  • London Borough of Bexley
    ELECTORAL REVIEW OF THE LONDON BOROUGH OF BEXLEY THE COUNCIL’S PROPOSALS FOR A NEW PATTERN OF ELECTORAL WARDS IN THE LONDON BOROUGH OF BEXLEY Section 1 Introduction The Council on 23 rd July 2014 resolved to seek a review of the electoral arrangements in the London Borough of Bexley on the basis of a proposal that the number of elected members of the Council should be reviewed to allow appropriate representation to best support residents. The Local Government Boundary Commission for England (“the Commission”) agreed that it would undertake a review of the London Borough of Bexley’s electoral arrangements. Initial meetings and briefings were conducted by the Commission in February 2015. The Council’s Constitution provides that General Purposes Committee is responsible for elections and electoral matters. On 14 th April that Committee agreed that a Working Group consisting of elected Members of the Council would meet to consider key issues with a view to reaching a consensus on the submissions to be made by the Council. The Working Group met on 2 nd June 2015 and 28 th July 2015 and its discussions informed the submission on Council size. The Council in its submission, with unanimous support from all political groups, proposed that the number of elected Councillors should be reduced from 63 to 45. The Commission has indicated that it is minded to recommend that 45 borough councillors should be elected to the London Borough of Bexley in future and on 8 th September opened its consultation inviting proposals for a new pattern of electoral wards to accommodate those councillors.
    [Show full text]
  • Boundary Commission for England
    BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND PROCEEDINGS AT THE 2018 REVIEW OF PARLIAMENTARY CONSTITUENCIES IN ENGLAND HELD AT CHAPEL, UNITED REFORM CHURCH HALL, 20 WIDMORE ROAD, BROMLEY BR1 1RY ON FRIDAY 21 OCTOBER 2016 DAY TWO Before: Mr Howard Simmons, The Lead Assistant Commissioner ____________________________________________________________ Transcribed from audio by W B Gurney & Sons LLP 83 Victoria Street, London, SW1H 0HW Telephone Number: 020 3585 4721/22 ____________________________________________________________ Time Noted: 9.00 am THE LEAD ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER: Ladies and gentlemen, good morning and welcome to the second day of the hearing in Bromley. I am Howard Simmons and I chair the meeting. My colleague will say a few words. MR TESSIER: My name is Gerald Tessier. I am the leader of the Boundary Commission team here supporting Howard, the Assistant Commissioner. For those who were not here yesterday, I have a few words of housekeeping. If you hear that alarm again, it means there is a fire and you should converge outside Boots. If you need toilets, they are just down in that corridor (indicating). I also remind you that the proceedings are being recorded and will be published later on in the process. There are copies of our data protection policy pinned on the board and available outside for those who are interested. THE LEAD ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER: I believe we have our first speaker, Mr Rennie. Would you like to come forward? Speak from the podium. If you could by way of introduction say your name and address before you tell us what you want to say, that would be helpful. DR RENNIE: My name is Dr Joseph Rennie.
    [Show full text]
  • Offside the Loss of London’S Playing Fields May 2006
    Environment Committee Offside The loss of London’s playing fields May 2006 Environment Committee Offside The loss of London’s playing fields May 2006 copyright Greater London Authority May 2006 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 ISBN 1 85261 885 X This publication is printed on recycled paper Cover image by Belinda Lawley Rapporteur’s Foreword Having played football and cricket on many of London's playing fields during my school, college and now my adult life, l know too well the controversies surrounding the loss of playing fields. Two key things struck me during our inquiry. Not enough use is made of the planning framework to protect our playing fields in London, and the sporting communities who regularly using them are not recognised as custodians of green spaces of London. I hope this report can go some way to preserving London’s playing fields, increasing access to, and use of them. Our report should be seen as a reference guide for all those who are working to maintain and develop playing fields. In it we: x Attempt to learn the lessons of recent loss of playing fields. x Map the nature of the growing relationship between artificial turf pitches (ATPs ) and grass playing fields, so as to find innovative approaches to fund their long term future; and x Set up baseline data and maps on playing fields availability across London beyond just school ones, covering others in the rest of the public sector and private ones which will help draw a line under the issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Estimation of Mortality Impacts of Particulate Air Pollution in London
    Consulting report P951-001 June 2010 Report on estimation of mortality impacts of particulate air pollution in London Dr Brian G Miller Summary It is widely accepted by the medical and scientific communities that there is a link between exposure to air pollution and the effects on health. These effects can vary in severity including mortality (death) and morbidity (the occurrence of illnesses throughout a life time). The evidence base from scientific studies shows that increased levels of fine particles in the air can increase risks of death. Increased exposure to particulates aggravates respiratory and cardio vascular conditions and research has shown that these particles can be inhaled deep into the respiratory tract. Less, however, is known about the health effects from long-term exposure to other pollutants such as sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and ozone. For this reason, this study has focused on the estimation of the mortality impact of fine particulate matter in London over a long-term basis. Airborne pollution in the form of fine particles (PM 2.5 ) comes mostly from combustion sources; transport, domestic and industrial. The relationship between concentration and mortality rates, as recommended by the Committee on the Medical Effects of Air Pollution, is based on a large US study which 3 estimated that for every 10 µg/m increase in average PM 2.5 concentration there is a 6% increase in annual all-cause death rates. Applying this to population size data, average modelled PM 2.5 concentrations and mortality rates for Greater London, we have estimated the mortality impacts of fine particles in London, and their geographical distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Changes) Order 2000 Made - - - - - 10Th February 2000 Coming Into Force in Accordance with Article 1(2)
    STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2000 No. 312 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The London Borough of Bexley (Electoral Changes) Order 2000 Made - - - - - 10th February 2000 Coming into force in accordance with article 1(2) Whereas the Local Government Commission for England, acting pursuant to section 15(4) of the Local Government Act 1992(a), has submitted to the Secretary of State a report dated July 1999 on its review of the London borough of Bexley together with its recommendations: And whereas the Secretary of State has decided to give effect to those recommendations subject to one modification: Now, therefore, the Secretary of State, in exercise of the powers conferred on him by sections 17(b) and 26 of the Local Government Act 1992, and of all other powers enabling him in that behalf, hereby makes the following Order: Citation, commencement and interpretation 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the London Borough of Bexley (Electoral Changes) Order 2000. (2) This Order shall come into force— (a) for the purpose of proceedings preliminary or relating to any election to be held on 2nd May 2002, on 10th October 2001; (b) for all other purposes, on 2nd May 2002. (3) In this Order— “borough” means the London borough of Bexley; “existing”, in relation to a ward, means the ward as it exists on the date this Order is made; and any reference to the map is a reference to the map prepared by the Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions marked “Map of the London Borough of Bexley (Electoral Changes) Order 2000”, and deposited in accordance with regulation 27 of the Local Government Changes for England Regulations 1994(c).
    [Show full text]
  • Air Quality in Bexley a Guide for Public Health
    AIR QUALITY IN BEXLEY A GUIDE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH PROFESSIONALS Air Quality Information for Public Health Professionals – London Borough of Bexley COPYRIGHT Greater London Authority June 2013 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4531 Air Quality Information for Public Health Professionals – London Borough of Bexley CONTENTS Description Page How to use this document 1 1 Introduction 2 2 Air Pollution 3 2.1 External air pollution 3 2.2 Internal air pollution 6 3 Air Quality in LB Bexley 8 4 Air quality impacts on health 12 4.1 Premature deaths 12 4.2 Vulnerable groups 13 4.3 Air pollution and deprivation 14 4.4 The Public Health Outcomes Framework 15 5 Health impacts in LB Bexley 17 6 Co-benefits of improving air quality in London 20 6.1 Maximising the health benefits from improving air quality 20 6.2 Cost of the impact of Air Pollution 21 7 Policy and legal framework for improving air quality 23 7.1 EU Directive 23 7.2 UK air quality policy 23 7.3 Regional strategies 24 7.4 Local Authority responsibilities 26 8 Taking action 27 8.1 Actions taken by the Mayor 27 8.2 Borough level action 28 8.3 Individual action 30 9 Next steps 32 10 References 33 11 Glossary 35 12 Appendices 40 Appendix 1 – Annual mean concentration of pollutants 40 Appendix 2 – National air quality objectives 41 Appendix 3 – Actions for Londoners to mitigate and adapt to air pollution 43 Air Quality Information for Public Health Professionals – London Borough of Bexley HOW TO USE THIS DOCUMENT Air quality is an important Public Health issue in London, it contributes to shortening the life expectancy of all Londoners, disproportionately impacting on the most vulnerable.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Proposals for New Parliamentary Constituency Boundaries in The
    Initial proposals for new Parliamentary constituency boundaries in London Contents Summary 3 1 What is the Boundary Commission for England? 5 2 Background to the 2018 Review 7 3 Initial proposals for London 11 Initial proposals for the North Thames sub-region 12 Initial proposals for the South Thames sub-region 17 4 How to have your say 21 Annex A: Initial proposals for constituencies, 25 including wards and electorates Glossary 38 Initial proposals for new Parliamentary constituency boundaries in London 1 Summary Who we are and what we do What is changing in London? The Boundary Commission for England The London region has been allocated 68 is an independent and impartial constituencies – a reduction of five from non-departmental public body which is the current number. responsible for reviewing Parliamentary constituency boundaries in England. Our proposals leave four of the 73 existing constituencies unchanged. The 2018 Review As it has not always been possible to We have the task of periodically reviewing allocate whole numbers of constituencies the boundaries of all the Parliamentary to individual London boroughs, we have constituencies in England. We are currently grouped them into sub-regions. The conducting a review on the basis of rules number of constituencies allocated to each set by Parliament in 2011. The rules tell sub-region is determined by the electorate us that we must make recommendations of the combined boroughs. for new Parliamentary constituency boundaries in September 2018. They Of the existing constituencies, we propose also result in a significant reduction in to retain: one in the borough of Havering, the number of constituencies in England two in the borough of Richmond upon (from 533 to 501), and require that every Thames, and one in the borough of constituency – apart from two specified Kingston upon Thames.
    [Show full text]
  • Amenity Green Space
    SECTION 6 – AMENITY GREEN SPACE Amenity green space Definition 6.1 Amenity Green Space is most commonly found in housing areas. It includes informal recreation spaces and green spaces, with a primary purpose of providing opportunities for informal activities close to home or work, enhancing the appearance of residential or other areas. Amenity green space provides more of a visual amenity for older residents and a meeting place for young people. 6.2 The Mayor of London’s Guide to the Preparation of Open Space Strategies indicates that in the London context, these sites act as small local parks (between 0.4 and 2.0 hectares in size). Sites below 0.4 in size are referred to as pocket parks. Both sizes of open space would be expected in close proximity to the house. For the purposes of analysis (and to avoid confusion with the parks and gardens section) these spaces will be referred to as amenity spaces. 6.3 There are a number of benefits in providing this type of open space including informal recreation value and the provision of a meeting place or/and focal point for communities. It is also important to recognise and take account of the secondary functions of amenity green space, in particular the visual benefits. Visual benefits are often particularly important in the urban area. 6.4 Amenity spaces can play an integral role in increasing participation in physical activity across the Borough, providing local opportunities to participate in activity and informal sport. These spaces are often particularly popular with children and young people.
    [Show full text]