DOCSLIB.ORG

Deliverable 2.3 Synthesis on Estimates of Achievable Soil Carbon Sequestration on Agricutural Land Across Europe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Deliverable 2.3 Synthesis on Estimates of Achievable Soil Carbon Sequestration on Agricutural Land Across Europe Towards climate-smart sustainable management of agricultural soils Deliverable 2.3 Synthesis on estimates of achievable soil carbon sequestration on agricutural land across Europe Due date of deliverable: M12 Actual submission date: 29.01.2021 This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement N° 862695 Deliverable 2.3 Synthesis on estimates of achievable soil carbon sequestration on agricutural land across Europe GENERAL DATA Grant Agreement: 862695 Project acronym: EJP SOIL Project title: Towards climate-smart sustainable management of agricultural soils Project website: www.ejpsoil.eu Start date of the project: February 1 st , 2020 Project duration: 60 months Name of lead contractor: INRAE Funding source: H2020-SFS-2018-2020 / H2020-SFS-2019-1 Type of action: European Joint Project COFUND DELIVERABLE NUMBER: 2.3 DELIVERABLE TITLE: Synthesis on estimates of achievable soil carbon sequestration on agricutural land across Europe DELIVERABLE TYPE: Report/ORDP/Website/Ethics WORK PACKAGE N: WP2 WORK PACKAGE TITLE: A roadmap for Agricultural Soil Management in Europe DELIVERABLE LEADER: Agroscope and CRA-W AUTHORS: Leonor Rodrigues, Julia Fohrafellner, Brieuc Hardy, Bruno Huyghebaert, Jens Leifeld CONTRIBUTORS OF DATA AND Alberto Sanz Cobeña ,Alice Budai, Andis Lazdiņš, CO-AUTHORES: Arezoo Taghizadeh, Axel Don, Bartosz Adamczyk, Benjamin Gimeno, Benjamin Sánchez, Bo Stenberg, Claudia Di Bene, Corina Carranca, Dalia Feiziene, Daniel Rasse, Daria Seitz, Dario Fornara, Eduardo Aguilera, Elena Rodriguez, Eloïse Mason, Erich Inselsbacher, Gabriela Barančíková, Grzegorz Siebielec, Heide Spiegel, Imants Kukuļs Jacek Niedźwiecki, Jan P. Lesschen, Karin Kauer, Kestutis Armolaitis, Lilian OSullivan, Lenka Pavlu, Maarten De Boever, Nils Kauer, Peter Kuikman, Peter Laszlo, Raquel Mano, Raimonds Kasparinskis, Rok Mihelič, Sevinc Madenoglu, Sophie Cornu, Sophie Zechmeister-Boltenstern, Stephan Glatzel Sylvain Pellerin, Teresa Gómez de la Bárcena, Thalisa Slier, Thomas Kätterer , Martin A. Bolinder, Kerstin Berglund, Toth Gergely COVER PICTURE: Agroscope, Gabriela Brändle DISSEMINATION LEVEL: CO/PU This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement N° 862695 2 Deliverable 2.3 Synthesis on estimates of achievable soil carbon sequestration on agricutural land across Europe ABSTRACT This synthesis identifies the available knowledge of achievable carbon sequestration in mineral soils and GHGs mitigation in organic soils in agricultural land, including pasture/grassland across Europe. The inventory of past and current studies on carbon sequestration and GHGs mitigation measures in agricultural soils and the methodology used for the assessment were considered from 25 Member states (MS) across Europe. The stocktake shows that availability of datasets concerning soil carbon sequestration (SCS) is variable among Europe. While northern Europe and central Europe is relatively well studied, there is a lack of studies comprising parts of Southern, Southeaster and Western Europe. Further, it can be concluded that at present country based knowledge and engagement is still poor; very few countries have an idea on their national-wide achievable carbon sequestration potential. The presented national SCS potentials (MS n=13) do however point towards important contributions to mitigate climate change by covering considerable shares of national greenhouse gas emissions from the agricultural sector in the range of 0.1-27 %, underpinning the importance of further investigations. In contrast to mineral soils, effective mitigation measures for organic soils while maintaining industrial agricultural production are still in its infancy. Very few mitigation options exist to mitigate GHG emissions without compromising agricultural production. Most GHG mitigation practices reported by the MS involve the restoration of organic soils, which means a complete abandonment of land from any agricultural use. Only one contribution (NL) reports possible mitigation potentials, which are based on specific water management measures (water level fixation). Nevertheless, there is an increasing awareness of the need of mitigation measures reflected by the several ongoing research projects on peatland management. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement N° 862695 3 Deliverable 2.3 Synthesis on estimates of achievable soil carbon sequestration on agricutural land across Europe Table of contents ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Table of contents ..................................................................................................................................... 4 List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ 5 List of Figures ........................................................................................................................................... 5 List of acronyms and abbreviations ......................................................................................................... 6 1. Executive summary ......................................................................................................................... 7 2. Introduction and goal of T2.4.3 ....................................................................................................... 8 3. Methodology and data source ........................................................................................................ 9 4. Results ............................................................................................................................................... 11 4.1 Data and data coverage .............................................................................................................. 11 4.2 Mineral soils ................................................................................................................................ 11 4.2.1 Question 1 (Q1): Are there any quantitative estimations of the achievable carbon sequestration under different soil management in your country (finished or ongoing studies)? 15 4.2.2 Measures and land use Q1 ................................................................................................... 21 4.2.3 Methods Q1: ......................................................................................................................... 21 4.2.4 Question 2 (Q2): Are there any estimated C sequestration rates for different management practices derived from field studies in your country (finished or ongoing studies)?.................... 24 4.2.5 Measures Q2 ........................................................................................................................ 24 4.2.6 Methods for quantifying changes in C stocks (Q2) .............................................................. 25 4.3 Organic soils ................................................................................................................................ 27 4.3.1 Question 3 (Q3): Are there any quantitative estimates for reducing GHG emissions (CO 2, CH 4, N 2O) from managed organic soils under different soil management in your country (finished or ongoing studies)? ...................................................................................................................... 28 4.3.2. Question 4: Are there any estimated GHG mitigation potentials for managed organic soils derived from field studies in your country? .................................................................................. 29 4.4 Knowledge gaps reported by MS ................................................................................................ 31 4.3.1 Knowledge gaps in C-Sequestration in mineral soils ............................................................ 31 4.3.2 Knowledge gaps in organic soils ........................................................................................... 38 4.5 General knowledge gaps and hot topics ..................................................................................... 42 4.5.1 GHG mitigation measure of organic soils: ............................................................................ 42 4.5.2 General methodological challenges: .................................................................................... 42 4.5.3 Socio-economic factors: ....................................................................................................... 42 4.5.4 SCS under climate change .................................................................................................... 43 4.5.5 Trade off C-Sequestration vs other GHG: ............................................................................. 43 4.5.6 Measures and alternatives: .................................................................................................. 44 4.5.7 Soil (bio-) chemical properties.............................................................................................. 44 4.5.8 Carbon use efficiency in differently managed systems ........................................................ 45 6 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Distribution of the Belgian Earwigs (Dermaptera)
    1908): a new species for the fauna of Belgium TAVERNIER J.M. & WOUTERS K., 1989. - Check-list (Isopoda Trichoniscidae). Bulletin et Annales de la of the terrestrial Isopoda (Crustacea) of Belgium. Societe royale beige d'Entomologie. 137: 29-31. In: WOUTERS K. & L. BAERT (Ed.), SHMALFUSS H., 2003. - World catalog of terrestrial Verhandelingen van het symposium "Invertebraten isopods (lsopoda: Oniscidea). Stuttgarter Bei~dige van BelgHf', KBIN, Brussel, 169-172. 1 zur Naturkunde, Seria A, Nr. 654. ' Bulletin S.R.B.E.IK.B. V.E .• /43 (2007) : 25-29 Distribution of the Belgian earwigs (Dermaptera) byKoenLOCK Merelstraat 27, B-9000 Gent ( e-mail : Koen_ [email protected]). Abstract Seven species of Dermaptera occur in Belgium, three of which are new for the Belgian fauna: Euborellia moesta (GENE 1839), Labidura riparia (P ALLAS 1773) and Forficula decipiens GENE 1832. All published records of Chelidura acanthopygia (GENE 1832) in Belgium actually belong to the recently described specfes C. guentheri (GAL VAGNI 1994). The three remaining species had already been reported preViously: Labia minor {LINNAEUS 1758), Apterygida media (HAGENBACH 1822) and Forficula auricularia LINNAEUS 1758. An overview was made of the literature about the Belgian earwigs, a checklist for the species occurring in Belgium is given and distribution maps of all the species are presented. Keywords : distribution maps, checklist, Belgium. Samenvatting In Belgie komen zeven soorten Dermaptera voor waarvan drie soorten nieuw zijn voor de Belgische fauna: Euborellia moesta (GENE 1839), Labidura riparia (PALLAS 1773) en Forficula decipiens GENE 1832. Alle gepubliceerde waarnemingen van Chelidura acanthopygia (GENE 1832) in Belgie behoren eigenlijk tot de recent beschreven soort C.
    [Show full text]
  • EIP-AGRI Seminar 'Promoting Creativity and Learning Through
    EIP-AGRI Seminar ‘Promoting creativity and learning through agricultural knowledge systems and interactive innovation’ 3-4 December 2015 Dublin, Ireland All information of the workshop available on www.eip-agri.eu at the event webpage http://ec.europa.eu/eip/agriculture/node/1336 Flemish information centre for agriculture Griet Lemaire Innovative agricultural media Background 1980 - 1990’s: Hormon scandals, crises (swine flu), animal welfare, manure surpluses,… Very bad perception of agriculture Stereotyped image of agriculture in the media Agricultural sector experienced the need for an independant organization that shows a true image of agriculture in Flanders Foundation of VILT • In 1996 • Non-profit organisation • Public and private collaboration • Flemish government • 5 Flemish provinces • Interest groups (supply chain agriculture) • 2 farmers organisations • 2 financial institutions Financial contribution (70% public – 30% private) Seat on the Board of Directors Mission statement “Promoting and stimulating a better knowledge and understanding of the Flemish agriculture through independant information and communication.” Take-off: searching phase • First 5 years • 1 employee • 1997: first research on public perception of agriculture • Agricultural education towards schools: mobile exhibition • Project approach: animal welfare, renewable energy,… • Magazine VILT-Info • target audience: consumer • showing the efforts of farmers on environment, animal welfare, etc. Growing up • 2000: Launch of www.vilt.be • Website with information
    [Show full text]
  • The Care Farming Sector in the Netherlands: a Reflection on Its Developments and Promising Innovations
    sustainability Article The Care Farming Sector in The Netherlands: A Reflection on Its Developments and Promising Innovations Jan Hassink 1,* , Herman Agricola 2, Esther J. Veen 3 , Roald Pijpker 3 , Simone R. de Bruin 3,4, Harold A. B. van der Meulen 5 and Lana B. Plug 3 1 Wageningen Plant Research, Wageningen University & Research, 6700AA Wageningen, The Netherlands 2 Wageningen Environmental Research, Wageningen University & Research, 6700AA Wageningen, The Netherlands; [email protected] 3 Department of Social Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 EW Wageningen, The Netherlands; [email protected] (E.J.V.); [email protected] (R.P.); [email protected] (S.R.d.B.); [email protected] (L.B.P.) 4 Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands 5 Wageningen Economic Research, Wageningen University & Research, 2502 LS The Hague, The Netherlands; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +31317480576 Received: 3 April 2020; Accepted: 4 May 2020; Published: 7 May 2020 Abstract: This paper describes the development of care farming in the Netherlands, one of the pioneering countries in this sector, where care farming has developed into a very diverse sector, with some farmers focussing primarily on agricultural production and others more specifically on providing care services. Care farms are increasingly open to a diversity of participants. The sector has become professionalised with the establishment of strong regional organisations and a steady growth increase in revenues, providing employment opportunities and boosting the economy of rural areas. In this paper, we highlight two promising innovations in care farming: education for school dropouts and the establishment of social farming activities in cities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pursuit of Agroecological Principles by Flemish Beef Farmers
    The pursuit of agroecological principles by Flemish beef farmers Advancing towards a body of thought for sustainable food systems Louis TESSIER Thèse présentée en vue de l’obtention du grade de Docteur en sciences agronomiques et ingénierie biologique Encadrée par : Philippe BARET (UCL) et Fleur MARCHAND (ILVO, UA) JURY: Président Pierre BERTIN (UCL) Membres Jo BIJTTEBIER (ILVO) Pierre GASSELIN (INRA) Patrick MEYFROIDT (UCL) Rebecka MILESTAD (KTH) Collection de thèses de l’Université catholique de Louvain, 2021 The pursuit of agroecological principles by Flemish beef farmers This research was financed by the Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food Own Capital Fund (EV-ILVO) and conducted at the ILVO Social Science Unit in Merelbeke over the period of November 2016 to October 2020, in cooperation with the research group SyTra at the Earth & Life Institute in Louvain- la-Neuve. The fruit of this cooperation is the doctoral dissertation presented in this manuscript. Instituut voor Landbouw-, Visserij- en Voedingsonderzoek – Landbouw & Maatschappij Burgemeester Van Gansberghelaan 115 9820 Merelbeke (Belgium) Unversité catholique de Louvain-La-Neuwe, Earth & Life Institute, Transition of Food Systems Croix du Sud 2, B367 1045 Louvain-La-Neuve (Belgium) Diffusion : www.i6doc.com, l’édition universitaire en ligne Sur commande en librairie ou à Diffusion universitaire CIACO Grand-Rue, 2/14 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgique Tél. 32 10 47 33 78 Fax 32 10 45 73 50 [email protected] Distributeur pour la France : Librairie Wallonie-Bruxelles 46 rue Quincampoix - 75004 Paris Tél. 33 1 42 71 58 03 Fax 33 1 42 71 58 09 [email protected] 2 Be ruthless with systems, be kind with people.
    [Show full text]
  • D3.1 Report on Current Farm Demographics and Trends
    Project acronym: SURE-Farm Project no.: 727520 Start date of project: June 2017 Duration: 4 years D3.1 Report on current farm demographics and trends Work Performed by P3 (OCILVO), in cooperation with P12 (IAMO) Jo Bijttebier1, Isabeau Coopmans1, Franziska Appel2, Ilkay Unay Gailhard2, Erwin Wauters1 1 Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food 2Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO) Contact: [email protected] Due date 31 May 2018 Version/Date 31 May 2018 Work Package WP 1 Task T 3.1 Task lead OCILVO Dissemination level Public Report on current farm demographics and trends This Project has received funds from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant 2 Agreement No. 727520 Report on current farm demographics and trends INDEX 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 6 1.1 Resilience of European farming systems ............................................................................ 7 1.2 Farm demographics and farm structural change ............................................................... 8 1.3 Farm demographics and resilience ................................................................................... 10 2 CASE-STUDY REGIONS ............................................................................................................... 12 3 DATA COLLECTION ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads/Ministerium/Beiraete/Duengungsfragen/Orgduengung
    water Article The Impact of Agricultural Production and Policy on Water Quality during the Dry Year 2018, a Case Study from Germany Susanne Klages *, Claudia Heidecke and Bernhard Osterburg Coordination Unit Climate, Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institute, Bundesallee 49, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany; [email protected] (C.H.); [email protected] (B.O.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-531596-1111 Received: 14 March 2020; Accepted: 18 May 2020; Published: 26 May 2020 Abstract: The hot summer of 2018 posed many challenges with regard to water shortages and yield losses, especially for agricultural production. These agricultural impacts might further pose consequent threats for the environment. In this paper, we deduce the impact of droughts on agricultural land management and on water quality owing to nitrate pollution. Using national statistics, we calculate a Germany-wide soil surface nitrogen budget for 2018 and deduce the additional N surplus owing to the dry weather conditions. Using a model farm approach, we compare fertilization practices and legal restrictions for arable and pig breeding farms. The results show that, nationwide, at least 464 kt of nitrogen were not transferred to plant biomass in 2018, which equals an additional average nitrogen surplus of 30 kg/ha. The surplus would even have amounted to 43 kg/ha, if farmers had continued their fertilization practice from preceding years, but German farmers applied 161 kt less nitrogen in 2018 than in the year before, presumably as a result of the new implications of the Nitrates Directive, and, especially on grassland, owing to the drought. As nitrogen surplus is regarded as an “agri-drinking water indicator” (ADWI), an increase of the surplus entails water pollution with nitrates.
    [Show full text]
  • Could Social Farming Be a Strategy to Support Food Sovereignty in Europe?
    land Article Could Social Farming Be a Strategy to Support Food Sovereignty in Europe? Antoni F. Tulla and Ana Vera * Department of Geography, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 12 February 2019; Accepted: 26 April 2019; Published: 30 April 2019 Abstract: Food sovereignty (FS) aims to obtain value-added products in proximity agriculture (PA) in order to achieve food security in a country. Social farming (SF) can help to develop this PA as well as favoring integration of people at risk of social exclusion (RSE). The methodology includes a review of the literature, a survey of 161 SF projects in Catalonia, and ten selected in-depth interviews. “Social Return on Investment” (SROI) methodology is also applied to assess the efficiency of the projects analyzed. The results show the economic, social, and environmental viability of the majority of the SF projects which, also favored by FS and PA, allows the development of innovative experiences and sustainable forms of governance. SF has been carried out in different ways in European countries, although with the common aims of benefitting people at RSE, and using the natural environment and PA through projects basically promoted by Third Sector entities. Management of these projects is in the hands of foundations and non-profit companies making top-down decisions, and in cooperatives and associations, where decision-making is bottom-up. It can be concluded that the promotion of SF can favor PA, and therefore, FS in Europe. Keywords: Catalonia; Europe; food sovereignty; governance; people at risk of social exclusion; proximity agriculture; social farming; social return on investment; Third Sector 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Organic in Europe PROSPECTS and DEVELOPMENTS Editor and Publisher
    ORGANIC IN EUROPE PROSPECTS AND DEVELOPMENTS EDITOR AND PUBLISHER: IFOAM EU Group, FiBL and CIHEAM-IAMB IFOAM EU Group Rue du Commerce 124, BE - 1000 Brussels, Belgium Phone: +32 2280 1223 - Fax: +32 2735 7381 [email protected] www.ifoam-eu.org EDITORS: Stephen Meredith and Helga Willer PRODUCTION SUppORT: Laura Ullmann, Ann-Kathrin Trappenberg, Laura Maeso and Kathleen Delage COUNTRY REPORT AND STATISTICAL DATA COLLECTION, DRAFTING AND EDITING: FiBL Projekte GmbH LANGUAge EDITING: Alastair Penny SpeCIAL THANKS FOR THEIR CONTRIBUTIONS TO: Bram Moeskops, Emanuele Busacca, Antje Kölling, Gianluigi Cardone and Patrizia Pugliese, Marie Reine Bteich, Lina Al-Bitar, Virginia Belsanti, Jürn Sanders, Otto Schmid, Diana Schaack and all ORGANIC national experts who contributed to the country reports. DESIGN AND LAYOUT: fuel.bvba/sprl – www.fueldesign.be The opinions expressed by the authors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of IFOAM EU. While all IN EUROPE efforts were taken to ensure the accuracy of the publication’s content and to collect statistics and reports from all countries, errors and omissions cannot be entirely ruled out. Corrections and additional content should be sent in writing to helga. [email protected]. Should revisions or additional content be necessary they will be published at: www.ifoam-eu.org. PROSPECTS AND PARTNERS: DEVELOPMENTS SUPPORTERS: Green Organics This publication was printed on FSC certified paper, by an FSC Chain of Custody certified printer, making use of vegetable inks. FOREWORD The organic movements are custodians of good food and good farming promoting the diversity of European food culture, safeguarding the long-term vitality of our countryside and contributing to development of a truly green economy underpinned by agro-ecological approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Organic Food and Farming in Flanders Editor: Lieve De Cock
    Research 2013 - 2014 Research Organic Food and Farming in Flanders Editor: Lieve De Cock Digital version: www.nobl.be Merelbeke, April 2015 ISBN number: 9789040303654 EAN: 9789040303654 Limitation of liability: This publication has been prepared by the editor with the utmost care and accuracy. However, there is no guarantee about the accuracy or completeness of the information in this publication. The user of this publication renounces any complaint against the editor, of any kind, regarding the use of the information made available through this publication. Under no circumstances shall the editor be liable for any adverse consequences arising from the use of the information made available through this publication. Organic Food and Farming in Flanders Research 2013-2014 Content Organic Food and Farming in Flanders: Research 2013-2014 Organic agriculture in Flanders 11 • Organic agriculture in Flanders in 2014 12 Research organisation 15 • Government of Flanders supports research for organic agriculture 16 • Organic farmers’ networks (Biobedrijfsnetwerken) 18 • CCBT vzw – Coordination of applied research on organic farming 20 • NOBL: Reflecting together on research about organic food and farming in Flanders 22 • The Flemish Organic Research and Knowledge network: Bridging research and practice 24 • The Research strategy for organic food and farming Flanders 26 • Organic agriculture as teacher for and student of conventional agriculture 28 • Agro-ecology: a new perspective on agriculture 30 Robust organic production systems – arable crop
    [Show full text]
  • The Potential of Reduced Tillage Agriculture in Flanders
    THE POTENTIAL OF REDUCED TILLAGE AGRICULTURE IN FLANDERS KAROLINE D’HAENE Promotors: Prof. Dr. ir. S. De Neve Prof. Dr. ir. D. Gabriels Em. Prof. Dr. ir. G. Hofman Department of Soil Management and Soil Care Dean: Prof. Dr. ir. H. Van Langenhove Rector: Prof. Dr. P. Van Cauwenberge KAROLINE D’H AENE THE POTENTIAL OF REDUCED TILLAGE AGRICULTURE IN FLANDERS Thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor (PhD) in Applied Biological Sciences: Land and Forest Management Dutch translation of the title: Het potentieel van gereduceerde bodembewerkingen voor landbouw in Vlaanderen Please refer to this work as follows: D’Haene, K., 2008. The potential of reduced tillage agriculture in Flanders. Dissertation, Ghent University, Ghent, 199 p. ISBN-number: 978-90-5989-218-7 The author and the promotors give the authorisation to consult and to copy parts of this work for personal use only. Every other use is subject to the copyright laws. Permission to reproduce any material contained in this work should be obtained from the author. Woord vooraf Een graankorrel groeit niet vanzelf uit tot een graangewas: er is een vruchtbare bodem en voldoende nutriënten, water, licht en warmte nodig. Bij een doctoraat is dit vergelijkbaar. Graag zou ik hier die mensen bedanken die gezorgd hebben voor een vruchtbare bodem en voor nutriënten, water, licht en warmte nodig om dit doctoraat tot stand te brengen. Vooreerst wens ik mijn promotoren, Prof. Dr. ir. Stefaan De Neve en Em. Prof. Dr. ir. Georges Hofman, te bedanken. Zij hebben mij de kans geboden om in april 1999 op de vakgroep Bodembeheer en bodemhygiëne met wetenschappelijk onderzoek te starten en hebben mij gestimuleerd om - na al die jaren met plezier landbouwonderzoek te hebben uitgevoerd - dit doctoraat te maken.
    [Show full text]
  • Sectoral Mobility of Production Factors in Agriculture and Predictions for the Future
    SECTORAL MOBILITY OF PRODUCTION FACTORS IN AGRICULTURE AND PREDICTIONS FOR THE FUTURE * 1 1 VANDERMEULEN VALERIE , METTEPENNINGEN EVY , CALUS MIEKE 1 Ghent University, Department of Agricultural Economics, Coupure links 653, 9000 Gent, Belgium * Corresponding author. Tel.: +32 (0)9 264 59 43; fax: +32 (0)9 264 62 46; e-mail: [email protected] Paper prepared for presentation at the 114th EAAE Seminar ‘Structural Change in Agriculture’, Berlin, Germany, April 15 - 16, 2010 Copyright 2010 by author(s). All rights reserved. Readers may make verbatim copies of this document for non-commercial purposes by any means, provided that this copyright notice appears on all such copies. 1 Abstract1 European agriculture has been characterized by a shift in structure towards larger farms with less labour employed. Within the current article we investigate the case of Flanders, a region in Belgium, and try to define what the sectoral shifts of labour and land have been in the past. Thereby we try to analyze and quantify structural change in Flemish agriculture, and to make projections for the future. The research was based on a Markov analysis of secondary census data, complemented by primary data obtained through a survey. In general it seems that structural change in Flemish agriculture follows the general trend of farms getting bigger, more specialized and employing more people per farm. This has consequences for productivity, efficiency, social and ecological effects of agriculture. Key Words Factor mobility, Agricultural sectors, Markov analysis, Structural change 1 Acknowledgments The data for this article have been collected in the framework of the project “Wijkers en Blijvers” executed by the Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Ghent and the Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research, and was financed by the Department Monitoring and Studies of the Administration for Agriculture and Horticulture of the Flemish Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Willem De Keyzer Methodological Aspects of Dietary
    FACULTY OF MEDICINE AND HEALTH SCIENCES Willem De Keyzer Methodological aspects of dietary intake assessment in food consumption surveys : from a national to an international level Supervisors Prof. dr. Stefaan De Henauw Prof. dr. ir. Pieter van ‘t Veer Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor in Medical Sciences 2014 De Keyzer, Willem Methodological aspects of dietary intake assessment in food consumption surveys: from a national to an international level Doctoraatsthesis Universiteit Gent Financial support Willem De Keyzer was financially supported by the Research Fund of University College Ghent. The EFCOVAL project was supported by European Community funding under the Sixth Framework Program (FOOD-CT- 2006-022895). FWO Flanders (Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek–Vlaanderen, Krediet aan navorsers – 1519110N) Verschenen in de reeks monografieën van de vakgroep Maatschappelijke Gezondheidkunde, Universiteit Gent. Wettelijk depot: D/2014/4531/3 ISBN: 9789078344353 © 2014, De Keyzer Willem ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. This work contains material protected under Copyright Laws and Treaties. Any unauthorized reprint or use of this material is prohibited. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system without express written permission from the author. Drukkerij-Uitgeverij Jan Verhoeven nv Bergensesteenweg 776 c 1600 Sint-Pieters-Leeuw Supervisors: prof. dr. Stefaan De Henauw Department of Public Health – unit Nutrition and Food Safety Ghent University – Belgium prof. dr. ir. Pieter van ’t Veer Division of Human Nutrition Wageningen University – the Netherlands Guidance committee: prof. dr. Inge Huybrechts Department of Public Health – unit Nutrition and Food Safety Ghent University – Belgium Dietary Exposure Assessment Group International Agency for Research on Cancer – Lyon, France prof.
    [Show full text]