Single-Cell Analyses of Transcriptional Heterogeneity During Drug Tolerance

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Single-Cell Analyses of Transcriptional Heterogeneity During Drug Tolerance Single-cell analyses of transcriptional heterogeneity PNAS PLUS during drug tolerance transition in cancer cells by RNA sequencing Mei-Chong Wendy Leea,1, Fernando J. Lopez-Diazb,1, Shahid Yar Khana,2, Muhammad Akram Tariqa,3, Yelena Daync, Charles Joseph Vasked, Amie J. Radenbaugha, Hyunsung John Kima, Beverly M. Emersonb,4, and Nader Pourmanda,4 aBiomolecular Engineering Department, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064; bLaboratory of Regulatory Biology, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037; cTransgenic Core Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037; and dFive3 Genomics, LLC, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 Edited by Lewis T. Williams, Five Prime Therapeutics, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, and approved September 29, 2014 (received for review March 12, 2014) The acute cellular response to stress generates a subpopulation of resistance. Multiplexed single-cell quantitative PCR (qPCR) reversibly stress-tolerant cells under conditions that are lethal to assays allow expression-based analysis of up to 96 targets in the majority of the population. Stress tolerance is attributed to a single experiment (13). Recently, a few groups have demon- heterogeneity of gene expression within the population to ensure strated that RNA-Seq of single cells using NGS technology is survival of a minority. We performed whole transcriptome se- feasible, reproducible, and usable for gene expression-based quencing analyses of metastatic human breast cancer cells sub- classification of cell subpopulations (14–17). A major advantage jected to the chemotherapeutic agent paclitaxel at the single-cell of RNA-Seq in single-cell studies is that the entire transcriptome and population levels. Here we show that specific transcriptional can be surveyed, rather than a limited number of genes. DNA programs are enacted within untreated, stressed, and drug- and RNA methodologies are not mutually exclusive and can be tolerant cell groups while generating high heterogeneity between combined to generate more biologically significant information. single cells within and between groups. We further demonstrate Paclitaxel (Taxol) is a chemotherapy drug commonly used to that drug-tolerant cells contain specific RNA variants residing in treat solid cancers including breast tumors (18). This toxin targets genes involved in microtubule organization and stabilization, as CELL BIOLOGY well as cell adhesion and cell surface signaling. In addition, the microtubules to interfere with the mitotic spindle, resulting in cell gene expression profile of drug-tolerant cells is similar to that of cycle arrest and ultimately apoptosis. Paclitaxel treatment kills untreated cells within a few doublings. Thus, single-cell analyses most tumor cells but, for the residual cancer cells, the mechanisms reveal the dynamics of the stress response in terms of cell-specific of resistance are unclear (18). An important question is whether RNA variants driving heterogeneity, the survival of a minority mutations that drive drug resistance are common in a population population through generation of specific RNA variants, and the or arise from unique mutations in individual cells. efficient reconversion of stress-tolerant cells back to normalcy. Significance single cell | paclitaxel | tumor heterogeniety | drug resistance | RNA-Seq Tumor cells are heterogeneous, and much variation occurs at the major barrier to successful cancer treatment is the re- single-cell level, which may contribute to therapeutic response. Acurrence of cancer cells with acquired resistance to che- Here, we studied drug resistance dynamics in a model of toler- motherapy (1–3). However, the molecular events underlying cancer ance with a metastatic breast cancer cell line by leveraging the cell evolution toward a drug-resistant phenotype are largely un- power of single-cell RNA-Seq technology. Drug-tolerant cells known. Recent studies using next-generation sequencing (NGS) within a single clone rapidly express high cell-to-cell transcript systems have attempted to identify the genetic changes that drive variability, with a gene expression profile similar to untreated tumorigenesis and resistance to treatments (4, 5). These sequenc- cells, and the population reacquires paclitaxel sensitivity. Our ing studies have revealed that many of the resistance-imparting gene expression and single nucleotide variants analyses suggest mutations identified are different from tumor to tumor. In addition that equivalent phenotypes are achieved without relying on to heterogeneity across tumors from different patients, intratumor a unique molecular event or fixed transcriptional programs. heterogeneity adds another level of complexity. Minor sub- Thus, transcriptional heterogeneity might ensure survival of populations of cancer cells can harbor aberrations that are asso- cancer cells with equivalent combinations of gene expression ciated with resistance to therapy and tumor progression (6–8). programs and/or single nucleotide variants. Thus, treatments may be effective against the majority of the tu- mor, but a small population of resistant cells can cause the per- Author contributions: M.-C.W.L., F.J.L.-D., B.M.E., and N.P. designed research; M.-C.W.L., sistence, recrudescence, or recurrence of cancer that is refractory F.J.L.-D., S.Y.K., M.A.T., and Y.D. performed research; M.-C.W.L., F.J.L.-D., C.J.V., A.J.R., and H.J.K. analyzed data; and M.-C.W.L., F.J.L.-D., B.M.E., and N.P. wrote the paper. to further treatment. Sequencing studies on bulk tumor tissue can only identify mutations present in subpopulations of a heteroge- The authors declare no conflict of interest. neous tumor in a limited capacity. By sequencing the transcriptome This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. of single cells in depth, low abundance mutations can be detected Data deposition: The sequencing short reads data have been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive at the National Center for Biotechnology Information, www.ncbi.nlm.nih. that will facilitate identifying the drivers of drug resistance. gov/sra (accession no. SRP040309). Recent advances have enabled the analysis of DNA and RNA 1M.-C.W.L. and F.J.L.-D. contributed equally to this work. within a single cell. The coupling of whole genome amplification 2Present address: The Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, and DNA sequencing have allowed multiple groups to study the MD 21287. genetics of single cells, but not without significant amplification 3 – Present address: Department of Pathology, King Edward Medical University, Nelagumbad, biases (9 11). Moreover, single-cell exome sequencing con- Anarkali, Lahore, Pakistan 54000. firmed the clonal heterogeneity of a solid tumor identifying key 4To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: [email protected] or mutations across much of the genome (12). DNA sequencing can [email protected]. identify mutations across the genome, but is unable to illuminate This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10. expressional differences that can contribute significantly to drug 1073/pnas.1404656111/-/DCSupplemental. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1404656111 PNAS Early Edition | 1of10 Downloaded by guest on September 27, 2021 Here we leverage the power of single-cell RNA-Seq to identify A Ptx Ptx B Untreated single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and gene expression at the Drug free single-cell level in an insightful drug-tolerance experimental Naïve cells Ptx-Rcr cells paradigm. We evaluated three groups of cells from the human days 0 5 5+1 5 +n breast carcinoma cell line, MDA-MB-231: untreated cells, stressed cells that had been exposed to paclitaxel treatment for 5 d plus 1 d 100X drug free, and drug-tolerant cells from a small (n < 64) clonal Stressed population of cells that resumed proliferation after paclitaxel (5d Ptx +1day) treatment. In addition to sequencing the mRNA of single cells, we also performed DNA sequencing of a population of untreated Untreated Stressed Drug-Tolerant (1.0±0.5e-2) (2±1e-6) cells and RNA-Seq of a population from each of the three groups to facilitate the identification of SNVs and RNA variants. We also Single-cell (n=5-6) / populations (n>10,000) RNA- sequencing performed differential gene expression profiling for single cells and population cells of the three groups to identify the tran- 100X C MDA-MB-231 Drug- tolerant scriptional stress response and cytotoxic effects of paclitaxel on 100 (5d Ptx +22d) IC50=7 nM gene expression. 75 DT 50 Results Naïve 25 % cell number IC50=0.2 nM Generation of a Paclitaxel Tolerance Paradigm in Metastatic Human relative to control 0 Cancer Cells and Isolation of Single Cells. To investigate the mo- 1 10 0.1 40X 100 0.01 lecular events associated with the response of cancer cells to 0.001 Paclitaxel (nM) drug-treatment followed by drug withdrawal that may be po- MCF10A MDA-MB-231-DT clone tentially associated with drug tolerance, we exposed the pacli- D (5d Ptx +15d) 100 IC =0.6 nM taxel-sensitive (IC50 < 10 nM) (18) metastatic human breast 50 cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 to paclitaxel (100 nM) according 75 to the regimen diagrammed in Fig. 1A. After 5 d of drug expo- 50 DT % cell number 25 Naïve sure, most cells had died. Residual cells alive 1 d after paclitaxel relative to control IC50=0.08 nM removal were considered to be a stressed cell population, and the 0 1 200X 10 – 0.1 majority of these cells underwent apoptosis within 2 4 wk. A 100 0.01 small number of residual stressed cells resumed proliferation and 0.001 Paclitaxel (nM) established clones, and such cells were considered to be drug- B – Fig. 1. Reversible phenotypic equilibrium in response to paclitaxel in cancer tolerant cells (Fig. 1 ). A drug toxicity curve was also con- cells. (A) Regimen for expansion of paclitaxel (Ptx) stress-tolerant cells. structed using a range of paclitaxel concentrations (Fig. 1C). The Highly metastatic MDA-MB-231 naïve (yellow) cells were treated with Ptx IC50 was ∼7 nM with ∼20% viable cells.
Recommended publications
  • HOOK3 Is a Scaffold for the Opposite-Polarity Microtubule-Based
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/508887; this version posted December 31, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. HOOK3 is a scaffold for the opposite-polarity microtubule-based motors cytoplasmic dynein and KIF1C Agnieszka A. Kendrick1, William B. Redwine1,2†, Phuoc Tien Tran1‡, Laura Pontano Vaites2, Monika Dzieciatkowska4, J. Wade Harper2, and Samara L. Reck-Peterson1,3,5 1Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093. 2 Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115. 3Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, Division of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093. 4Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO 80045. 5Howard Hughes Medical Institute †Present address: Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO 64110 ‡Present address: Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138. *Correspondence to: Samara Reck-Peterson 9500 Gilman Drive, Leichtag 482 La Jolla CA, 92093 [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1553-465X 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/508887; this version posted December 31, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
    [Show full text]
  • Product Datasheet KIF1C Antibody NB100-57510
    Product Datasheet KIF1C Antibody NB100-57510 Unit Size: 0.1 ml Store at 4C. Do not freeze. Reviews: 1 Publications: 1 Protocols, Publications, Related Products, Reviews, Research Tools and Images at: www.novusbio.com/NB100-57510 Updated 3/16/2021 v.20.1 Earn rewards for product reviews and publications. Submit a publication at www.novusbio.com/publications Submit a review at www.novusbio.com/reviews/destination/NB100-57510 Page 1 of 3 v.20.1 Updated 3/16/2021 NB100-57510 KIF1C Antibody Product Information Unit Size 0.1 ml Concentration 0.2 mg/ml Storage Store at 4C. Do not freeze. Clonality Polyclonal Preservative 0.09% Sodium Azide Isotype IgG Purity Immunogen affinity purified Buffer TBS and 0.1% BSA Product Description Host Rabbit Gene ID 10749 Gene Symbol KIF1C Species Human, Mouse Immunogen The immunogen recognized by this antibody maps to a region between residue 1053 and the C-terminus (residue 1103) of human kinesin family member 1C (lethal toxin sensitivity 1) using the numbering given in entry NP_006603.2 (GeneID 10749). Product Application Details Applications Western Blot, Immunoprecipitation Recommended Dilutions Western Blot 1:2000-1:10000, Immunoprecipitation 2 - 5 ug/mg lysate Page 2 of 3 v.20.1 Updated 3/16/2021 Images Western Blot: KIF1C Antibody [NB100-57510] - KIF1C is a novel HOOK3 -interacting protein.sfGFP-3xFLAG and full length (FL) HOOK3, HOOK3 (1-552), and HOOK3 (553-718) all tagged with sfGFP and 3xFLAG were immunoprecipitated with alpha-FLAG antibodies from transiently transfected HEK-293T cells. Western blots with alpha-HC, alpha- FAM160A2, alpha-KIF1C, and alpha-FLAG antibodies were used to determine which proteins co-immunoprecipitated with each HOOK3 construct.DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.28257.015 Image collected and cropped by CiteAb from the following publication (https://elifesciences.org/articles/28257), licensed under a CC-BY licence.
    [Show full text]
  • 047605V1.Full.Pdf
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/047605; this version posted April 8, 2016. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Assembly and Activation of Dynein-Dynactin by the Cargo Adaptor Protein Hook3 Courtney M. Schroeder1,2 and Ronald D. Vale1,2 1The Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA 2Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA. Corresponding Author: Ronald D. Vale Dept. of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology University of California, San Francisco Genentech Hall, MC 2200, Room N312A 600-16th Street San Francisco, CA 94158-2517 E-mail: [email protected] Phone: 415-476-6380 Fax: 415-514-4412 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/047605; this version posted April 8, 2016. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 2 Abstract Metazoan cytoplasmic dynein moves processively along microtubules with the aid of dynactin and an adaptor protein that joins dynein and dynactin into a stable ternary complex. Here, we have examined how Hook3, a cargo adaptor involved in Golgi and endosome transport, forms a motile dynein-dynactin complex. We show that the conserved Hook domain interacts directly with the dynein light intermediate chain 1 (LIC1).
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Analysis of Germline and Tumor DNA Identifies New Candidate Genes Involved in Familial Colorectal Cancer
    Supplementary Materials: Integrated Analysis of Germline and Tumor DNA Identifies New Candidate Genes Involved in Familial Colorectal Cancer Marcos Díaz-Gay, Sebastià Franch-Expósito, Coral Arnau-Collell, Solip Park, Fran Supek, Jenifer Muñoz, Laia Bonjoch, Anna Gratacós-Mulleras, Paula A. Sánchez-Rojas, Clara Esteban-Jurado, Teresa Ocaña, Miriam Cuatrecasas, Maria Vila-Casadesús, Juan José Lozano, Genis Parra, Steve Laurie, Sergi Beltran, EPICOLON Consortium, Antoni Castells, Luis Bujanda, Joaquín Cubiella, Francesc Balaguer and Sergi Castellví-Bel 100 80 10x ≥ age r 60 egions with cove r 40 ed r % of sha 20 0 I140 H458 H460 H461 H466 H468 H469 H470 FAM1 FAM3 FAM4 FAM19 FAM20 FAM22 FAM23 FAMN1 FAMN3 FAMN4 Families Figure S1. Histogram representing the percentage of genomic regions with a high-quality value of coverage (≥10×) with respect to all shared sequenced regions for each of the germline-tumor paired samples. Horizontal red line indicates sample filtering threshold (≥70% of shared regions with coverage above 10×). Figure S2. Pedigrees of the 18 families included in the study. Sample selected for germline and tumor whole-exome sequencing is indicated with an arrow. Filled symbols indicate affected for colorectal cancer (upper right quarter), adenoma/s (lower right quarter), gynecological cancer (ovary, uterine or breast cancer) (upper left quarter) and liver, stomach or pancreatic cancer (lower left quarter). Other cancer types are indicated in text with no symbol. IDs from samples undergoing germline whole-exome sequencing are also shown. AA/on-AA, advanced adenoma/non-advanced adenoma. Table S1. Description of germline copy number variants detected after calling with CoNIFER and ExomeDepth.
    [Show full text]
  • RNA Editing at Baseline and Following Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress
    RNA Editing at Baseline and Following Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress By Allison Leigh Richards A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Human Genetics) in The University of Michigan 2015 Doctoral Committee: Professor Vivian G. Cheung, Chair Assistant Professor Santhi K. Ganesh Professor David Ginsburg Professor Daniel J. Klionsky Dedication To my father, mother, and Matt without whom I would never have made it ii Acknowledgements Thank you first and foremost to my dissertation mentor, Dr. Vivian Cheung. I have learned so much from you over the past several years including presentation skills such as never sighing and never saying “as you can see…” You have taught me how to think outside the box and how to create and explain my story to others. I would not be where I am today without your help and guidance. Thank you to the members of my dissertation committee (Drs. Santhi Ganesh, David Ginsburg and Daniel Klionsky) for all of your advice and support. I would also like to thank the entire Human Genetics Program, and especially JoAnn Sekiguchi and Karen Grahl, for welcoming me to the University of Michigan and making my transition so much easier. Thank you to Michael Boehnke and the Genome Science Training Program for supporting my work. A very special thank you to all of the members of the Cheung lab, past and present. Thank you to Xiaorong Wang for all of your help from the bench to advice on my career. Thank you to Zhengwei Zhu who has helped me immensely throughout my thesis even through my panic.
    [Show full text]
  • Cargo Specific Regulation of Cytoplasmic Dynein by Effector Proteins
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2018 Cargo Specific Regulation Of Cytoplasmic Dynein By Effector Proteins Mara Olenick University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Biochemistry Commons, Biophysics Commons, and the Cell Biology Commons Recommended Citation Olenick, Mara, "Cargo Specific Regulation Of Cytoplasmic Dynein By Effector Proteins" (2018). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 3167. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/3167 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/3167 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cargo Specific Regulation Of Cytoplasmic Dynein By Effector Proteins Abstract Axonal transport is vital for the development and survival of neurons. The transport of cargo and organelles from the axon to the cell body is driven almost completely by the molecular motor, cytoplasmic dynein. Yet, it remains unclear how dynein is spatially and temporally regulated given the variety of cargo that must be properly localized to maintain cellular function. Previous work has suggested that adaptor proteins provide a mechanism for cargo-specific egulationr of motors. During my thesis work, I have investigated the role of mammalian Hook proteins, Hook1 and Hook3, as potential motor adaptors. Using optogenetic and single molecule assays, I found that Hook proteins interact with both dynein and dynactin, to effectively activate dynein motility, inducing longer run lengths and higher velocities than the previously characterized dynein activator, BICD2. In addition, I found that complex formation requires the N-terminal domain of Hook proteins, which resembles the calponin-homology domain of EB proteins yet cannot bind directly to microtubules.
    [Show full text]
  • Table S8. Positively Selected Genes (Psgs) Identified in Glyptosternoid and Yellowhead Catfish Lineages
    Table S8. positively selected genes (PSGs) identified in glyptosternoid and yellowhead catfish lineages. Lineage Gene ID Gene name Gene description P-value Corrected P-value G. maculatum ENSDARG00000000001 slc35a5 solute carrier family 35, member A5 0 0 G. maculatum ENSDARG00000000656 psmb9a proteasome (prosome, macropain) subunit, beta type, 9a 0 0 aldo-keto reductase family 7, member A3 (aflatoxin aldehyde G. maculatum ENSDARG00000016649 akr7a3 0 0 reductase) G. maculatum ENSDARG00000017422 apmap adipocyte plasma membrane associated protein 0 0 G. maculatum ENSDARG00000003813 srp54 signal recognition particle 54 0 0 G. maculatum ENSDARG00000016173 cct3 chaperonin containing TCP1, subunit 3 (gamma) 0.012102523 0.049848505 G. maculatum ENSDARG00000018049 sf3b2 splicing factor 3b, subunit 2 0 0 G. maculatum ENSDARG00000004581 sel1l sel-1 suppressor of lin-12-like (C. elegans) 0.004079946 0.01759805 G. maculatum ENSDARG00000020344 slc2a8 solute carrier family 2 (facilitated glucose transporter), member 8 0.00E+00 0 G. maculatum ENSDARG00000011885 mrpl19 mitochondrial ribosomal protein L19 0 0 G. maculatum ENSDARG00000012640 cideb cell death-inducing DFFA-like effector b 0.00112672 0.005077819 G. maculatum ENSDARG00000003127 zgc:123105 zgc:123105 0 0 G. maculatum ENSDARG00000012929 eif2d eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2D 0.001049906 0.004752953 G. maculatum ENSDARG00000012947 SKA2 spindle and kinetochore associated complex subunit 2 0 0 G. maculatum ENSDARG00000015851 pnn pinin, desmosome associated protein 0 0 G. maculatum ENSDARG00000011418 sigmar1 sigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1 0.00E+00 0 G. maculatum ENSDARG00000006926 btd biotinidase 0 0 G. maculatum ENSDARG00000012674 rpusd4 RNA pseudouridylate synthase domain containing 4 0.00E+00 0 G. maculatum ENSDARG00000017389 igfbp7 insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7 1.05E-02 0.043622349 G.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Characterization of the RH1-LZI Tandem of JIP3/4
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Structural characterization of the RH1-LZI tandem of JIP3/4 highlights RH1 domains as a cytoskeletal motor-binding motif Fernando Vilela1, Christophe Velours1, Mélanie Chenon1, Magali Aumont-Nicaise1, Valérie Campanacci1, Aurélien Thureau2, Olena Pylypenko3, Jessica Andreani 1, Paola Llinas1* & Julie Ménétrey 1* JIP3 and JIP4 (JNK-interacting proteins 3 and 4) are adaptors for cargo recruitment by dynein/dynactin and kinesin1 motors. Both are dimers that are stabilised by two sections of leucine zipper coiled coils. The N-terminal Leucine Zipper I (LZI) belongs to a section that binds dynein-DLIC and kinesin1-KHC, whilst the medial Leucine Zipper II (LZII) binds dynactin-p150glued and kinesin1-KLC. Structural data is available for the LZII, but the LZI section is still uncharacterized. Here we characterize the N-terminal part of JIP3/4 which consists of an RH1 (RILP homology 1) domain followed by the LZI coiled coil using bioinformatical, biophysical and structural approaches. The RH1-LZI tandem of JIP3 associates as a high afnity homodimer exhibiting elongated alpha-helical fold. 3D homology modelling of the RH1-LZI tandem reveals that the kinesin1-KHC binding site mainly overlaps with the RH1 domain. A sequence comparison search indicates that only one other protein family has RH1 domains similar to those of JIP3/4, the RILP (Rab-interacting lysosomal protein) family which consists of adaptor proteins linking Rab GTPases to cytoskeletal motors. RILPL2 is recruited through its RH1 domain by the myosin 5a motor. Here, we showed that the RH1 domain of JIP3 also interacts with myosin 5 A in vitro, highlighting JIP3/4 as possible myosin 5a adaptors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kinesin Superfamily Handbook Transporter, Creator, Destroyer
    The Kinesin Superfamily Handbook Transporter, Creator, Destroyer Edited by Claire T. Friel First edition published 2020 ISBN: 978-1-138-58956-8 (hbk) ISBN: 978-0-429-49155-9 (ebk) 4 The Kinesin-3 Family Long-Distance Transporters Nida Siddiqui and Anne Straube CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 The Kinesin Superfamily Handbook The Kinesin-3 Family 4 Long-Distance Transporters Nida Siddiqui and Anne Straube CONTENTS 4.1 Example Family Members .............................................................................. 41 4.2 Structural Information .................................................................................... 41 4.3 Functional Properties ...................................................................................... 43 4.3.1 Autoinhibition of Kinesin-3 Motors and Their Activation .................45 4.4 Physiological Roles .........................................................................................46 4.4.1 Preference for Subsets of Microtubule Tracks .................................... 47 4.5 Involvement in Disease ...................................................................................48 Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................49 References ................................................................................................................49 The Kinesin-3s are a family of cargo transporters. They typically display highly processive plus-end-directed motion, either as dimers or in teams, formed via interaction with
    [Show full text]
  • Dynein Activators and Adaptors at a Glance Mara A
    © 2019. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Journal of Cell Science (2019) 132, jcs227132. doi:10.1242/jcs.227132 CELL SCIENCE AT A GLANCE Dynein activators and adaptors at a glance Mara A. Olenick and Erika L. F. Holzbaur* ABSTRACT ribonucleoprotein particles for BICD2, and signaling endosomes for Cytoplasmic dynein-1 (hereafter dynein) is an essential cellular motor Hook1. In this Cell Science at a Glance article and accompanying that drives the movement of diverse cargos along the microtubule poster, we highlight the conserved structural features found in dynein cytoskeleton, including organelles, vesicles and RNAs. A long- activators, the effects of these activators on biophysical parameters, standing question is how a single form of dynein can be adapted to a such as motor velocity and stall force, and the specific intracellular wide range of cellular functions in both interphase and mitosis. functions they mediate. – Recent progress has provided new insights dynein interacts with a KEY WORDS: BICD2, Cytoplasmic dynein, Dynactin, Hook1, group of activating adaptors that provide cargo-specific and/or Microtubule motors, Trafficking function-specific regulation of the motor complex. Activating adaptors such as BICD2 and Hook1 enhance the stability of the Introduction complex that dynein forms with its required activator dynactin, leading Microtubule-based transport is vital to cellular development and to highly processive motility toward the microtubule minus end. survival. Microtubules provide a polarized highway to facilitate Furthermore, activating adaptors mediate specific interactions of the active transport by the molecular motors dynein and kinesin. While motor complex with cargos such as Rab6-positive vesicles or many types of kinesins drive transport toward microtubule plus- ends, there is only one major form of dynein, cytoplasmic dynein-1, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, which drives the trafficking of a wide array of minus-end-directed USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Signatures Differentiate Immune States in Type 1 Diabetes Families
    Page 1 of 65 Diabetes Molecular signatures differentiate immune states in Type 1 diabetes families Yi-Guang Chen1, Susanne M. Cabrera1, Shuang Jia1, Mary L. Kaldunski1, Joanna Kramer1, Sami Cheong2, Rhonda Geoffrey1, Mark F. Roethle1, Jeffrey E. Woodliff3, Carla J. Greenbaum4, Xujing Wang5, and Martin J. Hessner1 1The Max McGee National Research Center for Juvenile Diabetes, Children's Research Institute of Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, and Department of Pediatrics at the Medical College of Wisconsin Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA. 2The Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53211, USA. 3Flow Cytometry & Cell Separation Facility, Bindley Bioscience Center, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA. 4Diabetes Research Program, Benaroya Research Institute, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA. 5Systems Biology Center, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20824, USA. Corresponding author: Martin J. Hessner, Ph.D., The Department of Pediatrics, The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA Tel: 011-1-414-955-4496; Fax: 011-1-414-955-6663; E-mail: [email protected]. Running title: Innate Inflammation in T1D Families Word count: 3999 Number of Tables: 1 Number of Figures: 7 1 For Peer Review Only Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online April 23, 2014 Diabetes Page 2 of 65 ABSTRACT Mechanisms associated with Type 1 diabetes (T1D) development remain incompletely defined. Employing a sensitive array-based bioassay where patient plasma is used to induce transcriptional responses in healthy leukocytes, we previously reported disease-specific, partially IL-1 dependent, signatures associated with pre and recent onset (RO) T1D relative to unrelated healthy controls (uHC).
    [Show full text]
  • Upregulation of the Transcription Factor TFAP2D Is Associated With
    Fraune et al. Molecular Medicine (2020) 26:24 Molecular Medicine https://doi.org/10.1186/s10020-020-00148-4 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Upregulation of the transcription factor TFAP2D is associated with aggressive tumor phenotype in prostate cancer lacking the TMPRSS2:ERG fusion Christoph Fraune1†, Luisa Harms1†, Franziska Büscheck1, Doris Höflmayer1, Maria Christina Tsourlakis1, Till S. Clauditz1, Ronald Simon1* , Katharina Möller1, Andreas M. Luebke1, Christina Möller-Koop1, Stefan Steurer1, Claudia Hube-Magg1, Guido Sauter1, Sören Weidemann1, Patrick Lebok1, David Dum1, Simon Kind1, Sarah Minner1, Jakob R. Izbicki2, Thorsten Schlomm3, Hartwig Huland4, Hans Heinzer4, Eike Burandt1, Alexander Haese4, Markus Graefen4 and Cornelia Schroeder2 Abstract Background: TFAP2D is a transcription factor important for modulating gene expression in embryogenesis. Its expression and prognostic role in prostate cancer has not been evaluated. Methods: Therefore, a tissue microarray containing 17,747 prostate cancer specimens with associated pathological, clinical, and molecular data was analyzed by immunohistochemistry to assess the role of TFAP2D. Results: TFAP2D expression was typically increased in prostate cancer as compared to adjacent non-neoplastic glands. TFAP2D staining was considered negative in 24.3% and positive in 75.7% of 13,545 interpretable cancers. TFAP2D staining was significantly linked to advanced tumor stage, high classical and quantitative Gleason grade, lymph node metastasis, and a positive surgical margin (p ≤ 0.0045). TFAP2D positivity was more common in ERG fusion positive (88.7%) than in ERG negative cancers (66.8%; p < 0.0001). Subset analyses in 3776 cancers with and 4722 cancers without TMPRSS2:ERG fusion revealed that associations with tumor phenotype and patient outcome were largely driven by the subset of ERG negative tumors.
    [Show full text]