DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix 9C 2013 Thunderbird Flora and Fauna

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

AUGUST 2013 SHEFFIELD RESOURCES LTD THUNDERBIRD MINERAL SANDS PROJECT FLORA AND FAUNA SURVEY SCOPING STUDY REPORT This page has been left blank intentionally. Sheffield Resources Ltd Thunderbird Flora and Fauna Scoping Study SHEFFIELD RESOURCES LTD. THUNDERBIRD MINERAL SAND PROJECT FLORA AND FAUNA SURVEY SCOPING STUDY REPORT August 2013 i Sheffield Resources Ltd Thunderbird Flora and Fauna Scoping Study Document Status Approved for Issue Rev Author Reviewer Date Name Distributed To Date C Parker A R Young 29/07/2013 J Forbes‐Harper C Parker B R Young 29/07/2013 K Bauer‐Simpson M Teakle 31/07/2013 J Forbes‐Harper C Parker C R Young 16/08/2013 K Bauer‐Simpson M Teakle 16/08/2013 N Jackett D R Omodei M Macdonald 28/08/2013 K Bauer‐Simpson M Teakle 28/08/2013 ecologia Environment (2013). Reproduction of this report in whole or in part by electronic, mechanical or chemical means including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, in any language, is strictly prohibited without the express approval of Sheffield Resources Limited and ecologia Environment. Restrictions on Use This report has been prepared specifically for Sheffield Resources Limited. Neither the report nor its contents may be referred to or quoted in any statement, study, report, application, prospectus, loan, or other agreement document, without the express approval of Sheffield Resources Limited and ecologia Environment. ecologia Environment 1025 Wellington Street WEST PERTH WA 6005 Phone: 08 9322 1944 Fax: 08 9322 1599 Email: [email protected] August 2013 ii Sheffield Resources Ltd Thunderbird Flora and Fauna Scoping Study TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW .................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 SURVEY EFFORT ........................................................................................................................ 1 2 RESULTS ............................................................................................................................ 5 2.1 FLORA ........................................................................................................................................ 5 2.1.1 Species richness ......................................................................................................... 5 2.1.2 Sampling adequacy .................................................................................................... 5 2.1.3 Threatened and priority flora recorded within the Thunderbird study area ............ 6 2.1.4 Introduced flora .......................................................................................................11 2.1.5 Flora representing range extensions .......................................................................16 2.1.6 Species of Interest ...................................................................................................17 2.2 VEGETATION ...........................................................................................................................18 2.2.1 Priority Ecological Communities (PECs) ...................................................................18 2.3 FAUNA .....................................................................................................................................20 2.3.1 Conservation significant fauna recorded within the Thunderbird study area ........20 2.3.2 Fauna representing range extensions .....................................................................23 2.3.3 Other conservation significant fauna ......................................................................23 2.3.4 Species recorded .....................................................................................................24 3 DISCUSSION .................................................................................................................... 29 3.1 FLORA ......................................................................................................................................29 3.1.1 Regional distribution of conservation significant flora ...........................................29 3.1.2 Comparison with nearby surveys ............................................................................29 3.2 VEGETATION ...........................................................................................................................30 3.2.1 TEC and PEC .............................................................................................................30 3.3 FAUNA .....................................................................................................................................30 3.3.1 Regional distribution of conservation significant fauna ..........................................30 3.3.2 Impact on conservation significant fauna ...............................................................31 3.3.3 Comparison with nearby surveys ............................................................................31 3.3.4 Habitat potentially supporting conservation significant fauna ...............................31 3.4 ASSESSMENT OF BIOLOGICAL RESULTS AGAINST PROJECT PATHWAY ..................................33 4 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................ 37 4.1 FLORA AND VEGETATION ........................................................................................................37 4.2 VERTEBRATE FAUNA ...............................................................................................................37 4.3 INVERTEBRATE FAUNA ............................................................................................................37 August 2013 iii Sheffield Resources Ltd Thunderbird Flora and Fauna Scoping Study 5 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................... 39 August 2013 iv Sheffield Resources Ltd Thunderbird Flora and Fauna Scoping Study TABLES Table 2.1 – Diversity of the flora of the study area .................................................................................. 5 Table 2.2 – Most represented families and genera in the study area ..................................................... 5 Table 2.3 – Priority Flora recorded within the Thunderbird study area .................................................. 7 Table 2.4 – Introduced species recorded in the study area ...................................................................11 Table 2.5 – Environmental status of introduced species recorded in the study area ...........................12 Table 2.6 – Introduced flora recorded in the study area .......................................................................13 Table 2.7 – Taxa with range extensions greater than 100 km ...............................................................16 Table 2.8 – Conservation significant fauna recorded during the survey ...............................................20 Table 2.9 – Potential SRE fauna relevant to the Thunderbird study area ..............................................21 Table 2.10 – SRE specimens recorded during the survey.......................................................................21 Table 2.11 – Vertebrate species recorded during the survey ................................................................24 Table 3.1 – Distribution of Priority Flora recorded in the study area within Western Australia ...........29 Table 3.2 – Priority Flora present within nearby surveys .......................................................................30 Table 3.1 – Assessment of biological results against project feasibility ................................................34 FIGURES Figure 1.1 – Location of the study area .................................................................................................... 2 Figure 1.2 – Quadrat, fauna site and SRE locations within the study area .............................................. 3 Figure 2.1 – Average randomised species accumulation curve for the study area ................................. 6 Figure 2.2 – Priority flora of the study area ...........................................................................................10 Figure 2.3 – Introduced species locations in the study area ..................................................................15 Figure 2.4 – Cyperus sp. (AIC 1501‐0149) ...............................................................................................17 Figure 2.5 – Identified and potential PECs of the study area .................................................................19 Figure 2.6 – Conservation significant fauna recorded during the survey ..............................................22 APPENDICES Appendix A Flora Quadrat Locations .....................................................................................................41 Appendix B Flora Species List Recorded in the Project Area .................................................................45 Appendix C Locations of Priority Flora Recorded in the study area .....................................................53 Appendix D Conservation Codes for Threatened and Priority Flora and Fauna Species and Ecological Communities ......................................................................................................................57
Recommended publications
  • Southern Gulf, Queensland

    Southern Gulf, Queensland

    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
  • Nyangumarta Warrarn Indigenous Protected Area

    Nyangumarta Warrarn Indigenous Protected Area

    Traditional Ecological Knowledge of Nyangumarta Warrarn Indigenous Protected Area GENO DI US IGENO IN D US IN P R S P O A R S T E O A EC AR TE RE TED CTED A INDEX INTRODUCTION 2 BOTH (INLAND) AND COASTAL / WALYARTA NYANGUMARTA HIGHWAY (KIDSON TRACK) - INLAND TREE SPECIES SPECIES PARNTARL 78 TREE SPECIES JIKILY 80 JUKURTANY 6 MAKARTU / LAKURRU1 82 YALAKURRA 8 WURTARR 84 JULUKU 10 LOW TREE or SHRUB SPECIES JUNYJU 12 KUMPAJA 86 LOW TREE or SHRUB SPECIES LIRRINGKIN 88 MIRNTIRRJINA 14 SHRUB SPECIES NGALYANTA 16 JIMA 90 Warning: This document may contain pictures or names of people who PAJINAWANTI 18 PIRRNYURU 92 have since passed away. WIRLINY 20 MANGARR 94 JUMPURR 22 KARLUNKARLUN 96 This project was supported by Yamatji Marlpa Aboriginal Corporation, through KUMPALY 24 KARTAWURRU 98 funding from the Australian Government’s National Landcare Programme and JIMPIRRINY 26 JALKUPURTA 100 1 Indigenous Protected Areas Programme. YURTURL 28 WALYARTA (MANDORA MARSH) AND COASTAL SPECIES SHRUB SPECIES TREE SPECIES The traditional ecological knowledge contained in this publication was recorded by KARLAYIN 30 NGALINYMARRA 102 KAWARR 32 KURNTURUNGU 104 Vicki Long, ethno-botanist (Vicki Long & Associates), with the assistance of Brian PALMANGU 34 RANYJAMAYI 106 Geytenbeek, linguist. WAYALANY 36 TAMARISK 108 WARRI WARRI 38 LOW TREE or SHRUB SPECIES Photography: Vicki Long, José Kalpers, Volker Mischker and Mamoru Matsuki, PURNTAKARNU 40 KULINYJIRR 110 unless otherwise stated. PURARRPURARR 42 YURTURL 112 JULYUNGKU 44 YURTUL 114 Coordination: José Kalpers, Yamatji Marlpa Aboriginal Corporation. KALAYAKALAYA 46 JUMPURRU 116 PURTATU 48 MUNTURU 118 © All traditional and cultural knowledge in this publication is the MANGARR 50 SHRUB SPECIES intellectual property of the Nyangumarta people.
  • Northern Territory NT Page 1 of 204 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region Northern Territory, Northern Territory

    Northern Territory NT Page 1 of 204 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region Northern Territory, Northern Territory

    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
  • Approved EMP Appendices 1 to 12

    Approved EMP Appendices 1 to 12

    Appendix 1. Field Management Plans Environmental Management/ Control Monitoring Monitoring Report Objective Impact Activity Reporting Action Responsibility Value Strategy Action Frequency Frequency Flora/fauna No permanent Loss of protected • All vegetation Ensure all necessary Visual Weekly Corrective action record as Induction Person in charge detrimental flora species, clearing permits and approvals are required training impact to essential habitat • Removal of fertile in place and compliance Prior to start of biodiversity or and biodiversity topsoil obligations communicated work ecological to site personnel prior to function commencing vegetation clearing Mark the boundary of the Visual weekly Corrective action record as Monthly Person in charge work program area with required (summary in tape and/ or hi-viz fencing monthly designated for ‘No Go report) Zones’ and monitor integrity Ensure site specific fire Audit At start of new Audit report As required Person in charge management plans are in work and place quarterly Weed invasion/ • All vegetation Upgrade existing tracks Visual Weekly Corrective action record as Monthly Weeds Officer infestation and / clearing where practical to required increased • Accessing site by accommodate the heavy occurrence or vehicle vehicle traffic (including abundance of widening). feral animals Vehicle wash down prior Weed certificate Prior to Certificate At Weeds Officer to entering the area mobilization commencemen t Vehicle wash down for the Weed certificate As required Self-assessment As required
  • Tanami Gas Pipeline Annual Rehabilitation Monitoring Preliminary Report 2021

    Tanami Gas Pipeline Annual Rehabilitation Monitoring Preliminary Report 2021

    Tanami Gas Pipeline Annual Rehabilitation Monitoring Preliminary Report 2021 Australian Gas Infrastructure Group © ECO LOGICAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD 1 Tanami Gas Pipeline Annual Rehabilitation Monitoring Preliminary Report 2021 | Australian Gas Infrastructure Group DOCUMENT TRACKING Project Name Tanami Gas Pipeline Rehabilitation Monitoring Preliminary Report 2021 Project Number 18066 Project Manager Jeni Morris Prepared by Jeni Morris Reviewed by Jeff Cargill Approved by Jeff Cargill Status Draft Version Number v1 Last saved on 13 August 2021 This report should be cited as ‘Eco Logical Australia 2021. Tanami Gas Pipeline Rehabilitation Monitoring Preliminary Report 2021. Prepared for Australian Gas Infrastructure Group.’ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document has been prepared by Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd with support from Australian Gas Infrastructure Group. Disclaimer This document may only be used for the purpose for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the contract between Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd and Australian Gas Infrastructure Group. The scope of services was defined in consultation with Australian Gas Infrastructure Group, by time and budgetary constraints imposed by the client, and the availability of reports and other data on the subject area. Changes to available information, legislation and schedules are made on an ongoing basis and readers should obtain up to date information. Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report and its supporting material by any third party. Information provided is not intended to be a substitute for site specific assessment or legal advice in relation to any matter. Unauthorised use of this report in any form is prohibited.
  • An Inventory of Rangelands in Part of the Broome Shire, Western Australia

    An Inventory of Rangelands in Part of the Broome Shire, Western Australia

    Research Library Technical Bulletins Research Publications 2005 An inventory of rangelands in part of the Broome Shire, Western Australia W E. Cotching Follow this and additional works at: https://researchlibrary.agric.wa.gov.au/tech_bull Part of the Agricultural and Resource Economics Commons, Agricultural Economics Commons, Agricultural Science Commons, Desert Ecology Commons, Environmental Education Commons, Environmental Health Commons, Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons, Environmental Monitoring Commons, Geology Commons, Geomorphology Commons, Natural Resource Economics Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Physical and Environmental Geography Commons, Soil Science Commons, Sustainability Commons, Systems Biology Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Cotching, W E. (2005), An inventory of rangelands in part of the Broome Shire, Western Australia. Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Western Australia, Perth. Technical Bulletin 93. This technical bulletin is brought to you for free and open access by the Research Publications at Research Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in Technical Bulletins by an authorized administrator of Research Library. For more information, please contact [email protected]. An inventory of rangelands in part of the Broome Shire, Western Australia W.E. Cotching An inventory of rangelands in part of the Broome Shire, Western Australia By: W.E. Cotching Technical Bulletin No. 93 June 2005 Department of Agriculture 3 Baron-Hay Court SOUTH PERTH 6151 Western Australia ISSN 0083-8675 © State of Western Australia, 2005 Acknowledgments This document was first prepared in 1990, but remained unpublished. It was recompiled in 1998 as part of the Natural Resource Assessment Group ‘Value Adding’ project, which seeks to consolidate and document in a database, a vast amount of published and (especially) unpublished land resource information.
  • Co-Extinction of Mutualistic Species – an Analysis of Ornithophilous Angiosperms in New Zealand

    Co-Extinction of Mutualistic Species – an Analysis of Ornithophilous Angiosperms in New Zealand

    DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES CO-EXTINCTION OF MUTUALISTIC SPECIES An analysis of ornithophilous angiosperms in New Zealand Sandra Palmqvist Degree project for Master of Science (120 hec) with a major in Environmental Science ES2500 Examination Course in Environmental Science, 30 hec Second cycle Semester/year: Spring 2021 Supervisor: Søren Faurby - Department of Biological & Environmental Sciences Examiner: Johan Uddling - Department of Biological & Environmental Sciences “Tui. Adult feeding on flax nectar, showing pollen rubbing onto forehead. Dunedin, December 2008. Image © Craig McKenzie by Craig McKenzie.” http://nzbirdsonline.org.nz/sites/all/files/1200543Tui2.jpg Table of Contents Abstract: Co-extinction of mutualistic species – An analysis of ornithophilous angiosperms in New Zealand ..................................................................................................... 1 Populärvetenskaplig sammanfattning: Samutrotning av mutualistiska arter – En analys av fågelpollinerade angiospermer i New Zealand ................................................................... 3 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 5 2. Material and methods ............................................................................................................... 7 2.1 List of plant species, flower colours and conservation status ....................................... 7 2.1.1 Flower Colours .............................................................................................................
  • Environmental Heritage & Social Impact Services

    Environmental Heritage & Social Impact Services

    OCTOBER 2012 ENVIRONMENTAL HERITAGE & SOCIAL IMPACT SERVICES THUNDERBIRD DAMPIER PENINSULA PROJECT CULTURAL HERITAGE FLORA AND FAUNA ASSESSMENT REPORT TO THE KIMBERLEY LAND COUNCIL ABORIGINAL CORPORATION & THE NATIVE TITLE CLAIM GROUP This page has been left blank intentionally ENVIRONMENTAL HERITAGE & SOCIAL IMPACT SERVICES THUNDERBIRD DAMPIER PENINSULA PROJECT CULTURAL HERITAGE FLORA AND FAUNA ASSESSMENT REPORT TO THE KIMBERLEY LAND COUNCIL ABORIGINAL CORPORATION & THE NATIVE TITLE CLAIM GROUP Kimberley Land Council Aboriginal Corporation and the Native Title Claim Group Thunderbird Dampier Peninsula Project Cultural Heritage Flora and Fauna Assessment Document Status Approved for Issue Rev. Author Reviewer/s Date Name Distributed To Date 1 R. Young R. Young 29/08/12 L. Roque-Albelo M. Powers 31/08/12 N. Jackett M. Fairborn J Graff 2 N. Jackett K. Honczar 22/10/12 K. Honczar M. Powers 23/10/12 ecologia Environment (2012). Reproduction of this report in whole or in part by electronic, mechanical or chemical means including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, in any language, is strictly prohibited without the express approval of the Kimberley Land Council Aboriginal Corporation, the Native Title Claim Group and/or ecologia Environment. Restrictions on Use This report has been prepared specifically for the Kimberley Land Council Aboroginal Corporation and the Native Title Claim Group. Neither the report nor its contents may be referred to or quoted in any statement, study, report, application, prospectus, loan, or other agreement document (with the exception of when this document is required to be publicly released as part of a statutory approval process), without the express approval of the Kimberley Land Council Aboroginal Corporation and the Native Title Claim Group and/or ecologia Environment.
  • Rangelands, Western Australia

    Rangelands, Western Australia

    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
  • Burdekin, Queensland

    Burdekin, Queensland

    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
  • Glossary of Terms

    Glossary of Terms

    Appendix A Glossary of Terms Nolans Bore Mine Notice of Intent 126 Glossary of Terms Term Description 232Th An isotope of the element Thorium 238U An isotope of the element Uranium AAPA Aboriginal Areas Protection Authority ADG Australian Code for the Transport of Dangerous Goods by Road and Rail, 6th edition, 1998. ANSTO Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation ARI The Average Recurrence Interval is the average, or expected, value of the periods between exceedances of a given rainfall total accumulated over a given duration ARPANSA Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency AS Australian Standards BCM Bank Cubic Metre is a measure of the in-situ volume of a material Bench A landform consisting of a long strip of land at constant height in an otherwise sloped area. Benign waste Process or mining waste that is benign to the environment BoM Bureau of Meteorology Bulk density The weight of material (including solid particles and any contained water) per unit volume including water. Ca Calcium Calcium chloride An ionic compound of calcium and chlorine. (CaCl2) CAPEX Capital Expenditure CBR California Bearing Ratio Cheralite (CaTh[PO4]2). The dominant member of the Monazite group. Cl Chlorine CLC Central Land Council Cut-off A specified value below which ore becomes uneconomic for the operator to extract DBIRD Northern Territory Department of Business, Industry and Resource Development DCF Discounted Cash Flow DEH Division of Environment, Heritage and the Arts DN 100 Pipes with a Nominal Diameter of 100 millimetres Nolans Bore Mine Notice of Intent 127 Drill & blast A method in which holes are drilled for explosive charges.
  • Desert Channels, Queensland

    Desert Channels, Queensland

    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.