Environmental Heritage & Social Impact Services

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Environmental Heritage & Social Impact Services OCTOBER 2012 ENVIRONMENTAL HERITAGE & SOCIAL IMPACT SERVICES THUNDERBIRD DAMPIER PENINSULA PROJECT CULTURAL HERITAGE FLORA AND FAUNA ASSESSMENT REPORT TO THE KIMBERLEY LAND COUNCIL ABORIGINAL CORPORATION & THE NATIVE TITLE CLAIM GROUP This page has been left blank intentionally ENVIRONMENTAL HERITAGE & SOCIAL IMPACT SERVICES THUNDERBIRD DAMPIER PENINSULA PROJECT CULTURAL HERITAGE FLORA AND FAUNA ASSESSMENT REPORT TO THE KIMBERLEY LAND COUNCIL ABORIGINAL CORPORATION & THE NATIVE TITLE CLAIM GROUP Kimberley Land Council Aboriginal Corporation and the Native Title Claim Group Thunderbird Dampier Peninsula Project Cultural Heritage Flora and Fauna Assessment Document Status Approved for Issue Rev. Author Reviewer/s Date Name Distributed To Date 1 R. Young R. Young 29/08/12 L. Roque-Albelo M. Powers 31/08/12 N. Jackett M. Fairborn J Graff 2 N. Jackett K. Honczar 22/10/12 K. Honczar M. Powers 23/10/12 ecologia Environment (2012). Reproduction of this report in whole or in part by electronic, mechanical or chemical means including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, in any language, is strictly prohibited without the express approval of the Kimberley Land Council Aboriginal Corporation, the Native Title Claim Group and/or ecologia Environment. Restrictions on Use This report has been prepared specifically for the Kimberley Land Council Aboroginal Corporation and the Native Title Claim Group. Neither the report nor its contents may be referred to or quoted in any statement, study, report, application, prospectus, loan, or other agreement document (with the exception of when this document is required to be publicly released as part of a statutory approval process), without the express approval of the Kimberley Land Council Aboroginal Corporation and the Native Title Claim Group and/or ecologia Environment. ecologia Environment 1025 Wellington Street WEST PERTH WA 6005 Phone: 08 9322 1944 Fax: 08 9322 1599 Email: [email protected] October 2012 i Kimberley Land Council Aboriginal Corporation and the Native Title Claim Group Thunderbird Dampier Peninsula Project Cultural Heritage Flora and Fauna Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW .................................................................................................................1 1.2 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK .......................................................................................................1 1.3 SURVEY OBJECTIVES ..................................................................................................................2 2 BIOPHYSICAL CLIMATE ................................................................................................... 5 2.1 CLIMATE ....................................................................................................................................5 2.2 SOILS AND GEOLOGY ................................................................................................................6 2.3 VEGETATION .............................................................................................................................7 2.4 LAND SYSTEMS ..........................................................................................................................8 2.5 BIOGEOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................................9 3 SURVEY METHODS ........................................................................................................ 13 3.1 LITERATURE REVIEW AND DATABASE SEARCHES .................................................................. 13 3.2 CONSERVATION SIGNIFICANT SPECIES .................................................................................. 14 3.3 SURVEY TIMING ..................................................................................................................... 16 3.4 QUADRAT SELECTION ............................................................................................................ 16 3.5 SAMPLING METHODS ............................................................................................................ 20 3.6 ANIMAL ETHICS ...................................................................................................................... 21 3.7 VEGETATION MAPPING ......................................................................................................... 21 3.8 TAXONOMY AND NOMENCLATURE ....................................................................................... 21 3.9 CULTURAL HERITAGE SURVEY METHODOLOGY .................................................................... 22 3.10 IMPACT TO CULTURALLY SIGNIFICANT SPECIES .................................................................... 23 3.11 SURVEY TEAM ........................................................................................................................ 23 4 RESULTS ........................................................................................................................ 24 4.1 VEGETATION RESULTS ........................................................................................................... 24 4.2 FLORA RESULTS ...................................................................................................................... 32 4.3 FAUNA RESULTS ..................................................................................................................... 44 4.4 FAUNA HABITATS ................................................................................................................... 52 October 2012 ii Kimberley Land Council Aboriginal Corporation and the Native Title Claim Group Thunderbird Dampier Peninsula Project Cultural Heritage Flora and Fauna Assessment 5 FLORA AND FAUNA OF CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE ........................................................... 61 5.1 FLORA OF CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE ...................................................................................... 61 5.2 FAUNA OF CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE ..................................................................................... 96 6 DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................ 104 6.1 VEGETATION COMMUNITIES’ CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT ............................................ 104 6.2 FLORA CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT ................................................................................. 105 6.3 FLORA OF CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT .................................. 107 6.4 CONSERVATION SIGNIFICANT FAUNA WITH A MEDIUM OR HIGH LIKELIHOOD OF POTENTIALLY OCCURRING IN STUDY AREA ......................................................................... 111 7 REFERENCES................................................................................................................ 117 October 2012 iii Kimberley Land Council Aboriginal Corporation and the Native Title Claim Group Thunderbird Dampier Peninsula Project Cultural Heritage Flora and Fauna Assessment TABLES Table 2.1 – Climate Statistics for Broome Airport and Derby Aero Weather Station (BoM, 2011) ........6 Table 2.2 – Representation of Broad Scale Vegetation Units within the Study Area ..............................7 Table 2.3 – Land Systems of the Study Area ............................................................................................8 Table 3.1 – Databases Searched to determine the potential vertebrate fauna assemblage ............... 13 Table 3.2 – Previous Biological Survey Reports near the Study Area ................................................... 14 Table 3.3 – Likelihood of Occurrence Categories ................................................................................. 15 Table 3.4 – Regional Impact to the Conservation Significant Species .................................................. 15 Table 3.5 – Rainfall received at Derby and Broome preceeding the survey ........................................ 16 Table 3.6 - Location of Flora Quadrats. ................................................................................................. 16 Table 3.7 – Location of Fauna Survey Sites. .......................................................................................... 17 Table 3.8 – References used for Identification. .................................................................................... 22 Table 3.9 – Regional Impact to the Culturally Significant Species on th Dampier Peninsula ............... 23 Table 3.10 – Project Staff and Qualifications ........................................................................................ 23 Table 3.11 – Relevent DEC Licence Details ........................................................................................... 23 Table 4.1 – Taxonomic Composition of the Flora of the Study Area .................................................... 32 Table 4.2 – Most Frequently Recorded Families, Genera and Taxa in the Study Area ........................ 32 Table 4.3 – Priority Flora within 50-km buffer zone, and Assessment of Potential of Occurance ....... 33 Table 4.4 – Priority Flora Recorded in the Study Area .......................................................................... 39 Table 4.5 – Taxa with Range Extensions Greater than 100 km. ........................................................... 39 Table
Recommended publications
  • Congeneric Phylogeography of Australian Ogyris Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae)
    Congeneric Phylogeography of Australian Ogyris Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) Author Schmidt, Daniel J Published 2007 Thesis Type Thesis (PhD Doctorate) School School of Environmental Science DOI https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/2207 Copyright Statement The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/366723 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Congeneric phylogeography of Australian Ogyris butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) Daniel J. Schmidt B.Sc. (Hons) Australian Rivers Institute Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Griffith University Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, October 2006 ii iii Summary This study investigated spatial genetic structuring of two groups of Australian Ogyris butterflies (Lycaenidae). Ogyris represents one of several Australian endemic butterfly radiations that is well characterised in terms of basic biology but lacking in data useful for discriminating among the potential factors promoting divergence and speciation. A phylogeographic approach was used to document structuring in mitochondrial DNA markers (mtDNA) across the geographic range of two groups of closely related taxa. These include a pair of sister species: Ogyris zosine and O. genoveva, and the polytypic species O. amaryllis which is comprised of four subspecies. Topological relationships among recognised taxonomic units were tested and polyphyletic patterns investigated as a potential source of information relating to divergence and speciation. Sister species Ogyris zosine and O. genoveva were found to exhibit a polyphyletic relationship based on mtDNA. The deepest divergence within the group separated allopatric populations of O. zosine in northern Australia which do not correspond to a recognised taxonomic entity.
    [Show full text]
  • Acacia Eriopoda X Monticola
    WATTLE Acacias of Australia Acacia eriopoda Maiden & Blakely x Acacia monticola J.M.Black Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com B.R. Maslin Family Fabaceae Distribution This entity has a scattered distribution, mostly in the Kimberley region (N and S of Broome and E and S of Derby), but also recorded from “near Well 22” which is assumed to be on the Canning Stock Route on the N side of Lake Disappointment in the Little Sandy Desert. Specimens W.A.: 48 mi [77.2 km] from Broome towards Port Hedland, C.H. Gittins 1451 (PERTH); near Well 22, D. Hewitt 26 (PERTH); 57 mi (91 km) from Derby [on Great Northern Highway] towards Fitzroy Crossing, B.R. Maslin 2669 (PERTH); 46 km N of Broome on track to Coulomb Point, B.R. Maslin 4900 (PERTH); Dampier Downs Station (c. 150 km due SW of Derby), 49 km NW of homestead on station track to Broome (NW of Edgar Ranges), B.R. Maslin 7322 (DNA, PERTH). Notes The reticulately nerved phyllodes and Minni Ritchi or pseudo Minni Ritchi bark which is noted by some collectors suggests A. monticola is one of the parents of this putative hybrid. However, the second parent is less certain. At four locations the putative hybrid is recorded as occurring (usually at a low frequency) either within a population of A. eriopoda and A. monticola (C.H. Gittins 1451 and B.R. Maslin 2669 & 4900) and or within a population of A. monticola with A. eriopoda nearby (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • 503 Flora V7 2.Doc 3
    Browse LNG Precinct ©WOODSIDE Browse Liquefied Natural Gas Precinct Strategic Assessment Report (Draft for Public Review) December 2010 Appendix C-18 A Vegetation and Flora Survey of James Price Point: Wet Season 2009 A Vegetation and Flora Survey of James Price Point: Wet Season 2009 Prepared for Department of State Development December 2009 A Vegetation and Flora Survey of James Price Point: Wet Season 2009 © Biota Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd 2009 ABN 49 092 687 119 Level 1, 228 Carr Place Leederville Western Australia 6007 Ph: (08) 9328 1900 Fax: (08) 9328 6138 Project No.: 503 Prepared by: P. Chukowry, M. Maier Checked by: G. Humphreys Approved for Issue: M. Maier This document has been prepared to the requirements of the client identified on the cover page and no representation is made to any third party. It may be cited for the purposes of scientific research or other fair use, but it may not be reproduced or distributed to any third party by any physical or electronic means without the express permission of the client for whom it was prepared or Biota Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd. This report has been designed for double-sided printing. Hard copies supplied by Biota are printed on recycled paper. Cube:Current:503 (Kimberley Hub Wet Season):Doc:Flora:503 flora v7_2.doc 3 A Vegetation and Flora Survey of James Price Point: Wet Season 2009 4 Cube:Current:503 (Kimberley Hub Wet Season):Doc:Flora:503 flora v7_2.doc Biota A Vegetation and Flora Survey of James Price Point: Wet Season 2009 A Vegetation and Flora Survey of James Price
    [Show full text]
  • Unlocking the Kimberley's Past: the Applicability of Organic Spring
    Unlocking the Kimberley’s past: The applicability of organic spring deposits for reconstructing late Quaternary climatic and environmental change Emily Field M.Sc. Quaternary Science, 2010 B.A. (Hons) Geography, 2009 A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2018 School of Earth and Environmental Sciences Abstract There are limited high-resolution records of climatic and environmental change from the Kimberley region of northwest Australia. This has hindered the development of knowledge of climate and environmental change in Australia’s monsoonal tropics, and the ability to provide context for the area’s rich archaeological record and globally renowned rock art. The lack of high-resolution records from this region is primarily a result of the monsoonal climate which limits the presence of “classic” palaeoenvironmental archives such as perennial lakes and wetlands. Organic spring deposits are unconventional archives of past environmental change yet offer potential to provide outstanding records in arid and semi-arid regions such as the Kimberley. Despite this, the majority of existing research demonstrates complications with their use, in particular the application of standard radiocarbon (14C) techniques to build robust chronologies of their development. Because of the importance of springs as critical palaeoenvironmental archives, and the pressing need for high-resolution records from northwest Australia, this thesis utilised three organic spring deposits to develop new, high-resolution records of climate and environmental change for the Kimberley. These records span the last ~14,500 years, and were underpinned by a new protocol for establishing robust chronologies from these settings which was developed via a rigorous geochronological investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrative and Comparative Biology Integrative and Comparative Biology, Volume 60, Number 1, Pp
    Integrative and Comparative Biology Integrative and Comparative Biology, volume 60, number 1, pp. 190–201 doi:10.1093/icb/icaa015 Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology SYMPOSIUM Convergent Evolution of Elongate Forms in Craniates and of Locomotion in Elongate Squamate Reptiles Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/icb/article-abstract/60/1/190/5813730 by Clark University user on 24 July 2020 Philip J. Bergmann ,* Sara D. W. Mann,* Gen Morinaga,1,*,† Elyse S. Freitas‡ and Cameron D. Siler‡ *Department of Biology, Clark University, Worcester, MA, USA; †Department of Integrative Biology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA; ‡Department of Biology and Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA From the symposium “Long Limbless Locomotors: The Mechanics and Biology of Elongate, Limbless Vertebrate Locomotion” presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology January 3–7, 2020 at Austin, Texas. 1E-mail: [email protected] Synopsis Elongate, snake- or eel-like, body forms have evolved convergently many times in most major lineages of vertebrates. Despite studies of various clades with elongate species, we still lack an understanding of their evolutionary dynamics and distribution on the vertebrate tree of life. We also do not know whether this convergence in body form coincides with convergence at other biological levels. Here, we present the first craniate-wide analysis of how many times elongate body forms have evolved, as well as rates of its evolution and reversion to a non-elongate form. We then focus on five convergently elongate squamate species and test if they converged in vertebral number and shape, as well as their locomotor performance and kinematics.
    [Show full text]
  • Karajarri Literature Review 2014
    Tukujana Nganyjurrukura Ngurra All of us looking after country together Literature Review for Terrestrial & Marine Environments on Karajarri Land and Sea Country Compiled by Tim Willing 2014 Acknowledgements The following individuals are thanked for assistance in the DISCLAIMERS compilation of this report: The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the Karajarri Rangers and Co-ordinator Thomas King; author and do not necessarily reflect the official view of the Kimberley Land Council’s Land and Sea Management unit. While reasonable Members of the Karajarri Traditional Lands Association efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this publication (KTLA) and IPA Cultural Advisory Committee: Joseph Edgar, are factually correct, the Land and Sea Management Unit accepts no responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents. To the Mervyn Mulardy Jnr, Joe Munro, Geraldine George, Jaqueline extent permitted by law, the Kimberley Land Council excludes all liability Shovellor, Anna Dwyer, Alma Bin Rashid, Faye Dean, Frankie to any person for any consequences, including, but not limited to all Shovellor, Lenny Hopiga, Shirley Spratt, Sylvia Shovellor, losses, damages, costs, expenses, and any other compensation, arising directly or indirectly from using this publication (in part or in whole) and Celia Bennett, Wittidong Mulardy, Jessica Bangu and Rosie any information or material contained in it. Munro. This report contains cultural and intellectual property belonging to the Richard Meister from the KLC Land and Sea Management Karajarri Traditional Lands Association. Users are accordingly cautioned Unit, for coordination, meeting and editorial support as well to seek formal permission before reproducing any material from this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Kingdom Class Family Scientific Name Common Name I Q a Records
    Kingdom Class Family Scientific Name Common Name I Q A Records plants monocots Poaceae Paspalidium rarum C 2/2 plants monocots Poaceae Aristida latifolia feathertop wiregrass C 3/3 plants monocots Poaceae Aristida lazaridis C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Astrebla pectinata barley mitchell grass C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Cenchrus setigerus Y 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Echinochloa colona awnless barnyard grass Y 2/2 plants monocots Poaceae Aristida polyclados C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Cymbopogon ambiguus lemon grass C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Digitaria ctenantha C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Enteropogon ramosus C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Enneapogon avenaceus C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Eragrostis tenellula delicate lovegrass C 2/2 plants monocots Poaceae Urochloa praetervisa C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Heteropogon contortus black speargrass C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Iseilema membranaceum small flinders grass C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Bothriochloa ewartiana desert bluegrass C 2/2 plants monocots Poaceae Brachyachne convergens common native couch C 2/2 plants monocots Poaceae Enneapogon lindleyanus C 3/3 plants monocots Poaceae Enneapogon polyphyllus leafy nineawn C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Sporobolus actinocladus katoora grass C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Cenchrus pennisetiformis Y 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Sporobolus australasicus C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Eriachne pulchella subsp. dominii C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Dichanthium sericeum subsp. humilius C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Digitaria divaricatissima var. divaricatissima C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Eriachne mucronata forma (Alpha C.E.Hubbard 7882) C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Sehima nervosum C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Eulalia aurea silky browntop C 2/2 plants monocots Poaceae Chloris virgata feathertop rhodes grass Y 1/1 CODES I - Y indicates that the taxon is introduced to Queensland and has naturalised.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Structure of Vertebrate Communities Across the Australian
    Journal of Biogeography (J. Biogeogr.) (2013) 40, 1059–1070 ORIGINAL Phylogenetic structure of vertebrate ARTICLE communities across the Australian arid zone Hayley C. Lanier*, Danielle L. Edwards and L. Lacey Knowles Department of Ecology and Evolutionary ABSTRACT Biology, Museum of Zoology, University of Aim To understand the relative importance of ecological and historical factors Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1079, USA in structuring terrestrial vertebrate assemblages across the Australian arid zone, and to contrast patterns of community phylogenetic structure at a continental scale. Location Australia. Methods We present evidence from six lineages of terrestrial vertebrates (five lizard clades and one clade of marsupial mice) that have diversified in arid and semi-arid Australia across 37 biogeographical regions. Measures of within-line- age community phylogenetic structure and species turnover were computed to examine how patterns differ across the continent and between taxonomic groups. These results were examined in relation to climatic and historical fac- tors, which are thought to play a role in community phylogenetic structure. Analyses using a novel sliding-window approach confirm the generality of pro- cesses structuring the assemblages of the Australian arid zone at different spa- tial scales. Results Phylogenetic structure differed greatly across taxonomic groups. Although these lineages have radiated within the same biome – the Australian arid zone – they exhibit markedly different community structure at the regio- nal and local levels. Neither current climatic factors nor historical habitat sta- bility resulted in a uniform response across communities. Rather, historical and biogeographical aspects of community composition (i.e. local lineage per- sistence and diversification histories) appeared to be more important in explaining the variation in phylogenetic structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Fowlers Gap Biodiversity Checklist Reptiles
    Fowlers Gap Biodiversity Checklist ow if there are so many lizards then they should make tasty N meals for someone. Many of the lizard-eaters come from their Reptiles own kind, especially the snake-like legless lizards and the snakes themselves. The former are completely harmless to people but the latter should be left alone and assumed to be venomous. Even so it odern reptiles are at the most diverse in the tropics and the is quite safe to watch a snake from a distance but some like the Md rylands of the world. The Australian arid zone has some of the Mulga Snake can be curious and this could get a little most diverse reptile communities found anywhere. In and around a disconcerting! single tussock of spinifex in the western deserts you could find 18 species of lizards. Fowlers Gap does not have any spinifex but even he most common lizards that you will encounter are the large so you do not have to go far to see reptiles in the warmer weather. Tand ubiquitous Shingleback and Central Bearded Dragon. The diversity here is as astonishing as anywhere. Imagine finding six They both have a tendency to use roads for passage, warming up or species of geckos ranging from 50-85 mm long, all within the same for display. So please slow your vehicle down and then take evasive genus. Or think about a similar diversity of striped skinks from 45-75 action to spare them from becoming a road casualty. The mm long! How do all these lizards make a living in such a dry and Shingleback is often seen alone but actually is monogamous and seemingly unproductive landscape? pairs for life.
    [Show full text]
  • Arachnid Ecology in New Zealand, Exploring
    1 Arachnid ecology in New Zealand, exploring 2 unknown and poorly understood factors. 3 James Crofts-Bennett. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 “A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the degree of Master of Science [1] in Botany [2] at the 21 University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand” 22 2020 23 1 24 Index 25 26 Abstract………………………………………………………………………………………5. 27 Chapter 1. Introduction……………………………………………………………………...7. 28 1.1 The importance of spiders………………………………………………………...7. 29 1.2 The influence of habitat structural complexity on spider distribution and 30 abundance…………………………………………………………………………......8. 31 1.3 Invasive rodents in the context of New Zealand Araneae………………………...9. 32 1.4 Thesis structure and aims………………………………………………………..14. 33 Chapter 2. The effect of habitat structural complexity on spider abundance and diversity..15. 34 2.1 Introduction ……………………………………………………………………..15. 35 Figure 2.1: Seasonal deciduous vegetation cover…………………………...16. 36 Figure 2.2: Seasonal deciduous vegetation cover with mistletoe parasites…16. 37 2.2 Methods…………………………………………………………………………17. 38 Figure 2.3: Examples of foliage samples……………………………………18. 39 Table 2.1: Sampling locations, dates and host data…………………………19. 40 2.2.1 Statistical Analyses……………………………………………………………20. 41 2.3 Results…………………………………………………………………………...20. 42 Figure 2.4: Total invertebrates sampled in summer, plotted………………..22. 43 Figure 2.5: Total invertebrates sampled in winter, plotted………………….23. 44 Table 2.2: Paired t-tests of host plant invertebrate populations……………..25. 45 2.4 Discussion……………………………………………………………………….26. 46 Chapter 3. A novel non-kill Araneae trap: test with regards to vegetation type versus 47 location 48 effects………………………………………………………………………………………..28. 49 3.1 Introduction……………………………………………………………………...28.
    [Show full text]
  • Clearing Permit Decision Report
    Clearing Permit Decision Report 1. Application details 1.1. Permit application details Permit application No.: 3009/2 Permit type: Purpose Permit 1.2. Proponent details Proponent’s name: Hamersley Iron Pty Ltd 1.3. Property details Property: Iron Ore (Rhodes Ridge ) Agreement Authorisation Act 1972 , Temporary Reserves 70/4192, 70/4266, 70/4267, 70/4737 Local Government Area: Shire of East Pilbara Colloquial name: Geotechnical Test Pitting Project 1.4. Application Clearing Area (ha) No. Trees Method of Clearing For the purpose of: 112 Mechanical Removal Geotechnical Test Pitting 2. Site Information 2.1. Existing environment and information 2.1.1. Description of the native vegetation under application Vegetation Description Beard Vegetation Associations have been mapped at a scale of 1:250,000 for the whole of Western Australia. Three Beard Vegetation Associations are located within the application areas (Shepherd et al., 2001): • Beard Vegetation Association 18: Low woodland; mulga ( Acacia aneura ); • Beard Vegetation Association 29: Sparse low woodland; mulga, discontinuous in scattered groups; and • Beard Vegetation Association 82: Hummock grasslands, low tree steppe; snappy gum over Triodia wiseana . Mattiske Consulting (2008) has conducted a flora and vegetation survey over an area that included the application areas. The survey was conducted in April and May 2008 following favourable seasonal rainfall (Mattiske Consulting, 2008). Mattiske Consulting (2008) has recorded 25 vegetation units within the vegetation survey area with the following 11 being likely to be impacted by the proposed clearing: Flowlines (Creeklines and Drainage Areas): C2) Low woodland of Eucalyptus xerothermica, Eucalyptus victrix over Acacia citrinoviridis and Acacia maitlandii, Gossypium australe, Melaleuca lasiandra, Petalostylis labicheoides, Rulingia luteiflora over Triodia epactia, Chrysopogon fallax and Triodia pungens on minor creeklines with sandy soils.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Gulf, Queensland
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]