This Dissertation Has Been 65-5611 Microfilmed Exactly As Received BASICS, Walter Vladimir, 1927-ASSIMILATION of YUGOSLAVS in FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

This Dissertation Has Been 65-5611 Microfilmed Exactly As Received BASICS, Walter Vladimir, 1927-ASSIMILATION of YUGOSLAVS in FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO This dissertation has been 65-5611 microfilmed exactly as received BASICS, Walter Vladimir, 1927- ASSIMILATION OF YUGOSLAVS IN FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO. The Ohio State University, Ph. D ., 1964 Sociology, race question University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan Copyright by- Walter Vladimir Babies 1965 ASSIMILATION OF YUGOSLAVS IN FRANKLIN œUNTï, OHIO DISSERTATION Presented In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Walter Vladimir Babies, B.A., M.A. The Ohio S tate U niversity 1964 Approved by J j j , ^ Adviser Q Department of Sociology and Anthropology r ACKNOWLEDGMENIS The present study went through three stagest the planning stage, the interview stage, and the stage of analysis and writing. Professors Brewton Berry, Robert P. Bullook, and Christen T, Jonassen assisted during the planning stage. I am indebted to the seventy-five respondents for 'Uieir contri­ bution. Among the respondents were friends without whose assistance the interviews could not have been completed. I wish to thank e sp ecially Dr. Thomas G. Eynon who a ssiste d me during the analysis and writing phase of the work. Dr. Eynon unstint- ingly gave of his time and for this, I am profoundly grateful. Finally, my gratitude to Ruth, who encouraged her husband!s éducation before his first credit-hour of college. i i VITA August 19, 1927 Born - Johnstown, Pennsylvania 1956 . B.A., Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 1956-1957 Graduate Assistant, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 1957 . M.A., Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 1957-1960 Assistant, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, The % io S tate U niversity, Columbus, Ohio 1960-1962 Assistant Instructor, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, The %io State University, Colunbus, Ohio 1962-1964 . Instructor, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field : Sociology Studies in Sociological Theory. Professors Kurt Wolff and Roscoe 0. Hinkle Studies in Raoe and Ethnic Relations. Professor Brewton Berry Studies in Methodology. Professors Raymond F. Sletto and Robert P. Bullock Studies in Marriage and Family. Professor Merton D. Oyler Studies in Social Organization. Professors John F. Cuber and R ussell R. Dynes i i i CONTENTS Page AQQiCMLEDGMENTS............................. i l VITA ............................................................................... i l l TABLES............ .............................................................................................................. V Chapter I . INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY OF THE YUGOSLAVS.................................. 1 Yugoslav Diversity Reasons for anigrating History of Immigration to the United States Yugoslavs in the United States I I . EXAMINATION OF THE ASSIMILATION CONCEPT................................. 20 I I I . THE STUDY OF YUGOSLAV ASSIMILATION IN FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO................................................. 30 IV. FINDINGS.................................................................................................... 39 General Charaeteristios of the Three Ethnlo Categories Assimilation Differences between Serbs, Croats, and Maoedons Findings Relative to General Hypotheses about Assimilation Comparison of Findings with Previous Studies V. SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND INTERPRETATION................................. 58 APPENDIX A. RELEVANT TABLES.................................................................................. 68 B. THE INDEX OF ASSIMILATION SCALE.................................................. 121 C. INTERVIEW SCHEDULE............................................................................... 125 BIBLIOGRAPHY ......................................................................................................... 131 Iv TABLES T atle Page 1. Yugoslavian Emigration and Emigration, 1931*1937 . • • 14 2. Census of Foreign Born Yugoslavs, 1920-1960 15 3. Foreign Born Yugoslavs by S tates .................................................... 16 4. Foreign Born Yugoslavs in Urban Places of 10,000 or More in O h io ........................................................................................ 19 5* Median and Mean Index of Assimilation Scores with Significant t-Test Values for Serbs, Croats, and M aoedons................................................................................................ 50 6 . Direction of Differences among Serbs, Croats, and Maoedons on the Eight Assimilation Eidex Items ..... 52 7. Mean Assimilation Scores for Selected Ethnic Groups . 56 8 . Age of Yugoslavs........................................................................... 69 9 . Age on Entry to the United S ta te s ..................................... 70 10. Year of Arrival in the United S tates................................. 71 11. Republic of B irth ....................................................................... 72 12. Population of Community of Origin .................... 73 1 3 . Population of Community of O rig in..................................... 74 14. Relative or Friends in United States before Arrival . 74 1 5 . Source of Help during Emigration.......................................... 75 1 6 . Help Given to Other Yugoslavs during Their Emigration . 75 1 7 . Communicative Ties with Country of Origin ................ 76 1 8 . Marital Status ................................................................................... 76 1 9 . Years of Marriage ............................................................................... 77 20. Nativity of W ife........................................................................... ?8 V TABLES (Contd.) Table Page 21. Number of Children .................. 78 22. Relatives in the Uni ted States during Time of Interview . 79 23. Present Religious Affiliation ................................. 79 24. Occupation in Native Land of Serbs, Croats, and Maoedons . 80 23. Occupation in Native Land of S erbians...................................... 80 26. Occupation in Native Land of Croatians...................................... 81 27. Occupation in Native Land of Maoecvnians.................................. 81 28. Main Ooeupation Since Arrival in the United States .... 82 29 . Present Occupation............................................................................... 82 30. Neighborhood Location ...................................................... 83 31. Spoken-Engli sh Language A b i l i t y ................................. 83 32. Education in the United States ............................ 84 33. Home Ownership....................................................................................... 84 34. Preferred Folkways .................................... 83 33* Organizational Memberships ............................................................... , 83 36. Weekly Income Classified by under and over Sixty Dollars . 86 37 . Weekly Income by Twenty-dollar Intervals ................................. 8? 38 . Highest Year of Education ............................................................... 88 39* Discrimination Experienced in the United S ta te s ................. 88 40. Wife's Employment............................................................................... 89 41. Group's Preference for Other Groups .......................................... 89 42. Reasons for Emigration ................................................................... 90 43. Aspects of American Life Liked Best by Yugoslavs................. 90 v i TABLES (Contd.) Table Page 44. Major Problems In Adjusting to American L ife ........................... 91 45. Comparison of Living Conditions in Yugoslavia and United States .................................................................................... 91 46. Motivation for Movement to Columbus........................................... 92 47. Plaoe of Residence Prior to Columbus ........................................ 92 48. Years Lived Elsewhere before Columbus .................................... 93 49 . Years Lived in Columbus.................................................................. 94 5 0. Inter-group Differences................... 95 51. Index of Assimilation (IJl.) S cores ......................................... 96 52. Assimilation Indices of Serbian Interviewees .......................... 97 53. Assimilation Indices of Croatian Interview ees...................... 98 54. Assimilation Indices of Macedonian Interview ees................. 99 35* Median, Quartile, Mean, Standard Deviation, and Standard Error for Index of Assimilation Scores Classified by Ethnic Category ............................................................................ 100 36. English-proficiency D ifferences................... 100 37. Education Differences ...................................................................... 101 33. Naturalization-status Differences .... ............................. 101 39 . Property-ownership Differences...................................................... 102 60. Friendship Differences ....................................................................... 102 61. Folkway D ifferences ........................................................................... 103 62. Organiz&tion-membership D ifferences ......................................... 103 Ô3 . Weekly Earning D iffe re n c e s .................... 104 64. I.A. Scores Classified by Urbanity .............................................
Recommended publications
  • Evaluation of Wetlands and Floodplain Areas in the Danube River Basin Final Report May 1999
    DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME EVALUATION OF WETLANDS AND FLOODPLAIN AREAS IN THE DANUBE RIVER BASIN FINAL REPORT MAY 1999 Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance prepared by WWF Danube-Carpathian-Programme and WWF-Auen-Institut (Germany) DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME EVALUATION OF WETLANDS AND FLOODPLAIN AREAS IN THE DANUBE RIVER BASIN FINAL REPORT MAY 1999 Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance prepared by WWF Danube-Carpathian-Programme and WWF-Auen-Institut (Germany) Preface The "Evaluation of Wetlands and Flkoodplain Areas in the Danube River Basin" study was prepared in the frame of the Danube Pollution Reduction Programme (PRP). The Study has been undertaken to define priority wetland and floodplain rehabilitation sites as a component of the Pollution reduction Programme. The present report addresses the identification of former floodplains and wetlands in the Danube River Basin, as well as the description of the current status and evaluation of the ecological importance of the potential for rehabilitation. Based on this evaluation, 17 wetland/floodplain sites have been identified for rehabilitation considering their ecological importance, their nutrient removal capacity and their role in flood protection. Most of the identified wetlands will require transboundary cooperation and represent an important first step in retoring the ecological balance in the Danube River Basin. The results are presented in the form of thematic maps that can be found in Annex I of the study. The study was prepared by the WWF-Danube-Carpathian-Programme and the WWF-Auen-Institut (Institute for Floodplains Ecology, WWF-Germany), under the guidance of the UNDP/GEF team of experts of the Danube Programme Coordination Unit (DPCU) in Vienna, Austria.
    [Show full text]
  • Synopsis of European Neogene Freshwater Gastropod Localities: Updated Stratigraphy and Geography
    Palaeontologia Electronica palaeo-electronica.org Synopsis of European Neogene freshwater gastropod localities: updated stratigraphy and geography Thomas A. Neubauer, Elisavet Georgopoulou, Andreas Kroh, Mathias Harzhauser, Oleg Mandic, and Daniela Esu ABSTRACT The last overview of Cenozoic localities with records of freshwater gastropods was provided more than 80 years ago. Since then, a wealth of new information has been published: new localities have been discovered and fundamental changes occurred in regional stratigraphy. In addition, many localities are still attributed to erro- neous or outdated stratigraphical concepts even in recent papers. Geopolitical evolu- tion of Europe has, furthermore, led to name changes and confusion regarding the exact origin of samples in collections. Here we provide a fully georeferenced dataset for almost all published Miocene and Pliocene freshwater gastropod localities (2,930), including updated stratigraphic data where possible. This basic update will serve as an essential fundament for any future work related to the freshwater deposits and respec- tive faunas in general. Thomas A. Neubauer. Geological-Paleontological Department, Natural History Museum Vienna, Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria [email protected] Elisavet Georgopoulou. Geological-Paleontological Department, Natural History Museum Vienna, Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria [email protected] Andreas Kroh. Geological-Paleontological Department, Natural History Museum Vienna, Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria [email protected] Mathias Harzhauser. Geological-Paleontological Department, Natural History Museum Vienna, Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria [email protected] Oleg Mandic. Geological-Paleontological Department, Natural History Museum Vienna, Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria [email protected] Daniela Esu.
    [Show full text]
  • The Danube River Basin District
    / / / / a n ï a r k U / /// ija ven Slo /// o / sk n e v o l S / / / / a r o G a n r C i a j i b r S / / / / a i n â m o R / / / / a v o d l o M / / / / g á z s r ro ya ag M The /// a / blik repu Danube River Ceská / Hrvatska //// osna i Hercegovina //// Ba˘lgarija /// / B /// Basin District h ic e River basin characteristics, impact of human activities and economic analysis required under Article 5, Annex II randr Annex III, and inventory of protected areas required under Article 6, Annex IV of the EU Water Framework Directivee (2000/60/EC) t s Part A – Basin-wide overviewÖ / / Short: “Danube Basin Analysis (WFD Roof Report 2004)” / / d n a l h c s t u e D / / / / The complete report consists of Part A: Basin-wide overview, and Part B: Detailed analysis of the Danube river basin countries 18 March 2005, Reporting deadline: 22 March 2005 Prepared by International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River (ICPDR) in cooperation with the countries of the Danube River Basin District. The Contracting Parties to the Danube River Protection Convention endorsed this report at the 7th Ordinary Meeting of the ICPDR on December 13-14, 2004. The final version of the report was approved 18 March 2005. Overall coordination and editing by Dr. Ursula Schmedtje, Technical Expert for River Basin Management at the ICPDR Secretariat, under the guidance of the River Basin Management Expert Group. ICPDR Document IC/084, 18 March 2005 International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River Vienna International Centre D0412 P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Flood Wave Superposition for the Severity of Large Floods
    https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2019-312 Preprint. Discussion started: 9 July 2019 c Author(s) 2019. CC BY 4.0 License. The role of flood wave superposition for the severity of large floods Björn Guse1, Bruno Merz1,2, Luzie Wietzke1, Sophie Ullrich1, Alberto Viglione3,4, and Sergiy Vorogushyn1 1GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Hydrology Section, Potsdam, Germany 2University of Potsdam, Institute for Environmental Sciences and Geography, Potsdam, Germany 3Vienna University of Technology, Institute of Hydraulic Engineering and Water Resources Management, Vienna, Austria 4Politecnico di Torino, Department of Environment, Land and Infrastructure Engineering (DIATI), Torino, Italy Correspondence: Björn Guse ([email protected]) Abstract. The severity of floods is shaped not only by event and catchment specific characteristics but also depends on river network configuration. At the confluence of relevant tributaries to the main river, flood event characteristics may change de- pending on magnitude and temporal matching of flood waves. This superposition of flood waves may potentially increase flood severity. However, this aspect is up to now not analysed for a large data set. 5 To fill this gap, the role of flood wave superposition in determining flood severity is investigated. A novel methodological approach to analyse flood wave superposition is presented and applied to mean daily discharge data of 37 triple points from the four large river basins in Germany and Austria (Elbe, Danube, Rhine and Weser). A triple point consists of the three gauges at the tributary as well as upstream and downstream of the confluence to the main river. At the triple points, differences and similarities in flood characteristics are jointly analysed in terms of temporal matching and magnitudes of flood peaks.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Campaigns of the Thirty Years War Won by the Sword
    Rhine River Babenhausen Aschaffenburg HESSE-CASSEL Winter Spring Summer Fall Culmbach Main River Main River Lohr Hassfurt Darmstadt January February March April May June July August September October November December Siege / VP Worms Schweifurt HESSE-DARMSTADT Track Bayreuth 1 Bamberg PALATINATE Würzburg SAXONY Erbach Miltenberg 2 Neustadt Mannheim Mergentheim Windsheim Forchheim Key Strong Connector Fortress Heidelberg Fortress Nec Off Map 3 kar River Strong Nürnberg Village Connector Speyer Rothenburg on Town Adelsheim Tauber Wimpfen Hensbruck Town Difficult Terrain / 4 Amberg River Crossing Philipsburg Bishopric Connector Landau Bretten Ansbach Schwarzenfeld Permanently 5 Heilbronn Crailsheim Regional Feucht Major Neutral Eppingen River Border Durlach Neumarkt 6 Schwäbisch Hall Dinkelsbühl Gunzenhausen Pforzheim WÜRTTEMBERG FRANCONIA Regensburg 7 Hagenau Daßwang Ratisbon BOHEMIA Stuttgart Donau / Dan Gmünd Pappenheim 8 Nördlingen ube River Baden Aalen Eichstadt Straubing BOHEMIAN FOREST 9 CE Neustadt Calw kar River 10 ALSA Nec Göppingen Strasburg ADEN Winklsaß B Nürtingen Heidenheim Donauwörth Ingolstadt Kehl 11 Wildberg Neuburg ube River Vilshofen Tübingen Geislingen Donau / Dan Lec LOWER BAVARIA Iser River 12 Sontheim h River Landau Schlettstadt Günzburg Triberg 13 Horb WÜRTTEMBERG Schwabmünchen Rhine River Passau Lahr Landshut 14 Schrobenhausen Pfaffenhofen Colmar Ehingen Ulm Freising Zusmarshausen Balingen BAYERN Erharting 15 Iller River BAVARIA CK FOREST Rottweil Augsburg Breisach BLA 16 Hattenhofen Riedlingen UPPER AUSTRIA Freiburg
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 Drainage Basin of the Black Sea
    165 CHAPTER 5 DRAINAGE BASIN OF THE BLACK SEA This chapter deals with the assessment of transboundary rivers, lakes and groundwa- ters, as well as selected Ramsar Sites and other wetlands of transboundary importance, which are located in the basin of the Black Sea. Assessed transboundary waters in the drainage basin of the Black Sea Transboundary groundwaters Ramsar Sites/wetlands of Basin/sub-basin(s) Recipient Riparian countries Lakes in the basin within the basin transboundary importance Rezovska/Multudere Black Sea BG, TR Danube Black Sea AT, BA, BG, Reservoirs Silurian-Cretaceous (MD, RO, Lower Danube Green Corridor and HR, CZ, DE, Iron Gate I and UA), Q,N1-2,Pg2-3,Cr2 (RO, UA), Delta Wetlands (BG, MD, RO, UA) HU, MD, ME, Iron Gate II, Dobrudja/Dobrogea Neogene- RO, RS, SI, Lake Neusiedl Sarmatian (BG-RO), Dobrudja/ CH, UA Dobrogea Upper Jurassic-Lower Cretaceous (BG-RO), South Western Backa/Dunav aquifer (RS, HR), Northeast Backa/ Danube -Tisza Interfluve or Backa/Danube-Tisza Interfluve aquifer (RS, HU), Podunajska Basin, Zitny Ostrov/Szigetköz, Hanság-Rábca (HU), Komarnanska Vysoka Kryha/Dunántúli – középhegység északi rész (HU) - Lech Danube AT, DE - Inn Danube AT, DE, IT, CH - Morava Danube AT, CZ, SK Floodplains of the Morava- Dyje-Danube Confluence --Dyje Morava AT, CZ - Raab/Rába Danube AT, HU Rába shallow aquifer, Rába porous cold and thermal aquifer, Rába Kőszeg mountain fractured aquifer, Günser Gebirge Umland, Günstal, Hügelland Raab Ost, Hügelland Raab West, Hügelland Rabnitz, Lafnitztal, Pinkatal 1, Pinkatal 2, Raabtal,
    [Show full text]
  • SOLT I German Module 4 Lesson 2 Student Manual
    SOLT I German Module 4 Lesson 2 Student Manual Geography Geography German SOLT I Objectives Module 4 Lesson 2 At the end of this lesson you will be able identify the different German states and the countries surrounding Germany. In order to achieve this objective you will: Recognize the German States and Their Locations • Recognize the states’ locations, their capitals, major cities, and regions within the states • Describe their areas and borders • Brief about Germany • Describe the geography of Germany • Talk about the location of military installations in Germany • Identify the national flag of the country Identify Nationalities • Identify languages in the world countries • Identify different ethnic groups • Describe demographic composition 47 Geography German SOLT I Introduction Module 4 Lesson 2 Features of Germany You are planning a short vacation somewhere in Germany and have asked one of your German counterparts to describe some of the various landscapes, since you can’t decide. He gives you a quick description of Germany’s geography. Where will you decide to go? Deutschland hat sechzehn Bundesländer. Die Hauptstadt von Deutschland ist Berlin. In jedem Bundesland gibt es sehr schöne Landschaften. Im Norden ist die Nordsee mit der schönen Insel Sylt. Das Land ist flach. Die Bundesländer dort sind Schleswig-Holstein, Hamburg und Bremen. In der Mitte von Deutschland gibt es viele Berge. Besonders schön ist der Teutoburger Wald und der Hunsrück. Weiter südlich gibt es natürlich den berühmten Schwarzwald im Westen und den Bayrischen Wald. Einige Bundesländer dort sind Sachsen-Anhalt, Thüringen, Hessen und Nordrhein-Westfalen. Im südlichen Teil von Deutschland liegt Bayern.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy of Late Quaternary Fluvial Terraces at the Confluence of the Lech and Danube Valleys
    Quaternary Science Journal GEOZON SCIENCE MEDIA Volume 60 / Number 4 / 2011 / 414–424 / DOI 10.3285/eg.60.4.02 ISSN 0424-7116 E&G www.quaternary-science.net Stratigraphy of Late Quaternary fluvial terraces at the confluence of the Lech and Danube valleys Patrick Schielein, Gerhard Schellmann, Johanna Lomax Abstract: The main purpose oft the study is the Würmian Lateglacial and Holocene valley development at the confluence of the Lech and Danube valleys, located in the Northern Alpine Foreland. The morphological features in the study area were surveyed by field mapping and high resolution Digital Elevation Models. The deposits of both rivers were examined in numerous outcrops and dated using radiocarbon and luminescence measurements. Also archaeological data and historical maps were taken into account. The oldest terrace of the valley floor is a Würmian Lateglacial Niederterrasse, which is only prevalent in the Danube valley slightly downstream of the confluence. Fragmentary terraces of Preboreal/Boreal age have been preserved in both valleys and gravel deposits of this age extensively underlie younger terraces. The Atlantic period is not represented by river channel deposits in the study area. In contrast, Subboreal and Subalantic gravel deposits morphologically dominate the lower Lech valley and the Danube valley downstream of the confluence. Up to six Subatlantic terraces accompany the recent courses of Lech and Danube. The distribution and morphological appearance of the Late Subatlantic terraces at the Danube upstream of the confluence refer to a meandering river, whereas the morphology of the youngest Lech terraces predominantly relates to an anabranching river. Downstream of the Lech – Danube confluence the Subatlantic terrace morphology is a transitional one between a meandering and an anabranching depositional setting.
    [Show full text]
  • Manual on Danube Navigation Imprint
    Manual on Danube Navigation Imprint Published by: via donau – Österreichische Wasserstraßen-Gesellschaft mbH Donau-City-Straße 1, 1220 Vienna [email protected] www.via-donau.org Responsibility for content: Hans-Peter Hasenbichler Project management: Martin Paschinger Editing: Thomas Hartl, Vera Hofbauer Technical contributions: Maja Dolinsek, Simon Hartl, Thomas Hartl, Brigitte Hintergräber, Vera Hofbauer, Martin Hrusovsky, Gudrun Maierbrugger, Bettina Matzner, Lisa-Maria Putz, Mario Sattler, Juha Schweighofer, Lukas Seemann, Markus Simoner, Dagmar Slavicek Sponsoring: Hedwig Döllinger, Hélène Gilkarov Layout: Bernd Weißmann Print: Grasl Druck & Neue Medien GmbH Vienna, January 2013 ISBN 3-00-009626-4 © via donau 2013 Klimaneutrale Produktion Erneuerbare Energie Nachhaltiges Papier Pflanzenölfarben The Manual on Danube Navigation is a project of the National Action Plan Danube Navigation. Preface Providing knowledge for better utilising the Danube’s potential In connection with the Rhine, the Danube is more and more developing into a main European traffic axis which ranges from the North Sea to the Black Sea at a distance of 3,500 kilometres, thereby directly connecting 15 countries via waterway. Some of the Danube riparian states show the highest economic growth rates amongst the states of Europe. Such an increase in trade entails an enormous growth of traffic in the Danube corridor and requires reliable and efficient transport routes. The European Commission has recognised that the Danube waterway may serve as the backbone of this dynamically growing region and it has included the Danube as a Priority Project in the Trans-European Transport Network Siim Kallas (TEN-T) to ensure better transport connections and economic growth. Vice-President of the European Prerequisite for the utilisation of the undisputed potentials of inland naviga- Commission, Commissioner for tion is the removal of existing infrastructure bottlenecks and weak spots in the Transport European waterway network.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Wetlands and Floodplain Areas in the Danube River Basin Annex May 1999
    DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME EVALUATION OF WETLANDS AND FLOODPLAIN AREAS IN THE DANUBE RIVER BASIN ANNEX MAY 1999 Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance prepared by WWF Danube-Carpathian-Programme and WWF-Auen-Institut (Germany) DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME EVALUATION OF WETLANDS AND FLOODPLAIN AREAS IN THE DANUBE RIVER BASIN ANNEXES MAY 1999 Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance prepared by WWF Danube-Carpathian-Programme and WWF-Auen-Institut (Germany) Table of Contents Map 1 Floodplain areas in the Danube River Basin with protected areas along the studied rivers (scale 1:1 500 000) Map 2 Geographical Subdivision (scale 1:1 500 000 and 1:5 000 000) Map 3 Symbolized view of floodplains (scale 1:1 500 000 and 1:4 500 000) Map 4 Ecological potential of floodplains (scale 1:1 500 000 and 1:4 500 000) Map 5 Selected bioindicator species (White-tailed eagle) (scale 1:5 000 000) Map 6 Selected bioindicator species (Fish) (scale 1:5 000 000) Map 7 Restoration potential of former floodplains (scale 1:1 500 000 and 1:4 500 000) Factsheets 1 -17 with corresponding maps of the proposed restoration areas List of "Small Scale Wetland Restoration"-areas i Evaluation of Wetlands and Floodplain Areas in the Danube River Basin, Annexes 1 Site 1. Name of the site: Floodplain near Ingolstadt Country: Germany/Bavaria Region/town/community: Neuburg and Ingolstadt Size of the area: 1500 ha Site Description: The floodplain area upstream of Ingolstadt, between Bergheim and Ingolstadt, represents the largest floodplain forest complex on the Upper Danube with alpine characteristics, indicated by the abundance of grey alder (Alnus incana) in a typical oak-elm-hardwood forest.
    [Show full text]
  • WISCONSIN PR a IRIE a Nd SAVA NNA FLOR a THEODORE S
    ATL AS o f t h e WISCONSIN PR A IRIE a nd SAVA NNA FLOR A THEODORE S. COCHRANE AND HUGH H. ILTIS Technical Bulletin No. 191, 2000 Department of Natural Resources • Madison, Wisconsin 53707 Published in cooperation with University of Wisconsin–Madison Herbarium • Department of Botany Madison, Wisconsin 53706 Cover:Tallgrass prairie cross section, showing principal grasses and forbs, and extent of root development. Original drawing by Bobbie Lively Diebold. ABSTRACT This Atlas of theWisconsin Prairie and Savanna Floratreats most of the native vascular plants of Wisconsin grassland and savanna communities from the standpoints of floristics and phy- t o g e o g r a p h y. Included are 341 species and 73 additional subspecies, varieties, and hybrids (discussed and mapped) as well as 103 species and 50 infraspecific taxa and hybrids (dis- cussed or casually mentioned). Part I discusses the physical geography and climate of Wi s- consin; the composition of its prairie, barrens, and savanna communities; and the history of its flora. Part II consists of 354 dot maps showing the exact distributions of the taxa as based on herbarium specimens, each accompanied by a statement describing the plant’s habitats, abundance, overall distribution, and geo-floristic affinities. One of the practical uses of this work is to help guide ecologists and conservationists in the planning of prairie restorations. Key Wo r d s : Wisconsin, prairie, savanna, grassland, plant distribution, restoration, conservation. ATLAS OF THE WISCONSIN PRAIRIE AND SAVANNA FLORA TH E O D O R E S. CO C H R A N E A N D HU G H H.
    [Show full text]
  • Fachkräftebündnis Region Ulm/Oberschwaben (Donau-Iller)
    Fachkräftebündnis Region Ulm/Oberschwaben Fachkräftebündnis Region Ulm/Oberschwaben (Donau-Iller) Gemeinsame Erklärung zur Sicherung der Fachkräftebasis Berufliche Schulen in der Region Ulm/Oberschwaben Ulm im Mai 2013 Seite 1 Fachkräftebündnis Region Ulm/Oberschwaben A. Präambel Die Industrie- und Handelskammer Ulm, die Agentur für Arbeit Ulm, die Handwerkskammer Ulm, der Arbeitgeberverband Südwestmetall Bezirksgruppe Ulm, der Deutsche Gewerk- schaftsbund Region Südwürttemberg, der Alb-Donau-Kreis, der Landkreis Biberach, die Stadt Ulm, die Universität Ulm, die Hochschule Ulm, die Hochschule Biberach, die SRH Fernhochschule Riedlingen und das Staatliche Schulamt Biberach schließen das Fachkräf- tebündnis Region Ulm/Oberschwaben. Das Land Baden-Württemberg hat Mittel für eine geförderte Regionale Koordinierungsstelle zur Sicherung des Fachkräfteangebots in kleinen und mittelständischen Unternehmen bei der IHK Ulm bewilligt. Die Koordinierungsarbeit des Fachkräftebündnisses erfolgt deshalb durch die IHK Ulm in enger Abstimmung mit der Agentur für Arbeit Ulm und den anderen Partnern. Das Fachkräftebündnis basiert auf dem gemeinsamen Verständnis, dass die Sicherung der Fachkräftebasis für die Region Ulm/Oberschwaben eine der zentralen Zukunftsaufgaben ist. Die Fachkräftesicherung wird eine hohe Rendite erbringen. Diese gemeinsame Herausforde- rung erfordert eine abgestimmte Vorgehensweise der regionalen Akteure, um eine zielfüh- rende Transparenz, Kooperation und Kommunikation sicher zu stellen und zu fördern. Die Eigenständigkeit und Selbstverantwortung
    [Show full text]