DOCSLIB.ORG

Stella Swanson' ; 'Gunter Muecke'; James Archibald Cc: Subject: Great Lakes Radionuclide Level Reports

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stella Swanson' ; 'Gunter Muecke'; James Archibald Cc: Subject: Great Lakes Radionuclide Level Reports From: Panel Registry From: Virtue,Robyn-Lynne [CEAA] On Behalf Of DGR Review / Examen DFGP [CEAA] Sent: June 26, 2014 11:42 AM To: DGR Review / Examen DFGP [CEAA] Subject: Requested Reports To: 'Stella Swanson' ; 'Gunter Muecke'; James Archibald Cc: Subject: Great Lakes Radionuclide Level Reports Panel Members, As per your request to CNSC for updated information on radionuclide levels in Lake Huron during the public hearing in the Fall of 2013, enclosed are three reports - Bruce Power. Environmental Monitoring Program Report. April 2012; IJC Nuclear Task Force. Inventory of Radionuclides for the Great Lakes. December 1997; and Ahier, Brian A. and Bliss L. Tracy. “Radionuclides in the Great Lakes Basin.” Environmental Health Perspectives Volume 103, Supplement 9 (December 1995) - for your information. Thank you, Robyn Robyn-Lynne Virtue DGR Joint Review Panel Secretariat C/O Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency 160 Elgin Street, 22nd floor Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 <contact information removed> file:///M|/My%20Documents/Registry/DGR/Untitled.htm[04/07/2014 3:58:50 PM] 2012 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM REPORT B-REP-07000-00005 R000 April 2013 Master Created: 26Apr2013 12:14 B-REP-07000-00005 Rev 000 April 2013 Page 2 of 176 2012 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM REPORT Master Created: 26Apr2013 12:14 B-REP-07000-00005 Rev 000 April 2013 Page 4 of 176 2012 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM REPORT ABSTRACT OF PRESENT REVISION: Executive Summary: The purpose of this report is to fulfill regulatory requirements under Licence Condition 1.7 of Bruce Power’s Nuclear Power Reactor Operating Licence’s (PROL) 15:00/2014 and PROL 16:00/2014. This licence condition requires Bruce Power to submit an annual environmental monitoring report by April 30th of each year per Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) regulatory standard S-99 Section 6.4.5. This report describes the effluent and environmental monitoring programs related to Bruce Power’s operations. The monitoring programs include both radiological and hazardous substances and quantify the effect on human and non-human biota. The radiological emission from the Bruce Site is well within regulatory limits. Furthermore, for the 21st consecutive year Bruce Power’s calculated dose to a member of the public is less than the 10 μSv/year value that is regarded as the lower threshold for significance (the de minimus). Dose to potential critical groups are calculated using IMPACT 5.4.0. The most recent site specific survey results (2011 Site Specific Survey), 2012 meteorological data, effluent and environmental monitoring data for Bruce site for year 2012 are all taken into account for the calculation. The highest dose estimated for year 2012 is 1.2 μSv, representing 0.1% of the regulatory dose limit of 1000 μSv/y. The critical group estimated for year 2012 is the “one year old infant” at the Bruce Mennonite Farmer 3 location. 2012 Critical Group Dose Critical Group Committed Effective Dose Percentage of Legal Limit BMF3 Infant 1.17 μSv/y 0.12% Bruce Power compliance with relevant environmental legislation, regulations, and other requirements. Bruce Power adopts applicable best industry standards as a framework for achieving continual improvement and sustainable performance excellence, while minimizing our environmental impact and preventing pollution. Bruce Power will continue towards the implementation of CSA N288.4-10, N288.5-11 and N288.6-12. Bruce Power complies with the Environmental Compliance Approvals and Permits issued by the Ontario Ministry of Environment. Bruce Power continues to monitor site/offsite groundwater. Bruce Power complies with the Federal Regulations and programs which protect human health and the environment under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act. Master Created: 26Apr2013 12:14 B-REP-07000-00005 Rev 000 April 2013 Page 5 of 176 2012 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM REPORT Table of Contents Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................10 1.1 Purpose....................................................................................................................................10 1.2 Regulatory Requirements ........................................................................................................11 2.0 BACKGROUND.......................................................................................................................12 2.1 Bruce Power Site .....................................................................................................................12 2.2 Site Facilities............................................................................................................................12 3.0 MONITORING PROGRAM METHODOLOGIES.....................................................................13 3.1 Radiological Effluent Monitoring Program Methodologies .......................................................13 3.2 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Methodologies.............................................14 3.3 Conventional (Hazardous Substances) Monitoring Program Methodologies...........................23 3.4 Impacts and Biodiversity Monitoring Program Methodologies .................................................23 4.0 RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENT MONITORING PROGRAM - BRUCE A, BRUCE B, CMLF, OPG, AECL .................................................................................................................23 4.1 2012 Radiological Effluent Results ..........................................................................................23 4.2 Historical Radiological Effluent Results....................................................................................28 4.3 Opportunities for Improvement ................................................................................................33 5.0 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM.........................................34 5.1 External Gamma in Air.............................................................................................................34 5.2 Tritium and Carbon-14 in Air....................................................................................................37 5.3 Tritium and Gross Beta in Precipitation ...................................................................................43 5.4 Water Samples ........................................................................................................................45 5.5 Milk Samples............................................................................................................................52 5.6 Sediment Samples...................................................................................................................55 5.7 Fish Samples ...........................................................................................................................59 5.8 Agricultural Products................................................................................................................72 5.9 Determination of Radiological Dose to Public..........................................................................81 5.10 Radiological Dose Modelling....................................................................................................85 5.11 Radiological Quality Assurance Program ................................................................................87 6.0 CONVENTIONAL (HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES) MONITORING PROGRAM 2012 ...........92 6.1 Hazardous Substances Effluent Monitoring Program ..............................................................93 6.2 Air.............................................................................................................................................95 6.3 Environmental Compliance Approval.......................................................................................95 6.4 Water .......................................................................................................................................97 6.5 Groundwater ............................................................................................................................98 6.6 Waste and Pollution Prevention.............................................................................................105 Master Created: 26Apr2013 12:14 B-REP-07000-00005 Rev 000 April 2013 Page 6 of 176 2012 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM REPORT 7.0 IMPACTS AND BIODIVERSITY MONITORING PROGRAM................................................106 7.1 Bass Nesting..........................................................................................................................106 7.2 Bass Creel .............................................................................................................................114 7.3 Whitefish Gillnetting ...............................................................................................................122 7.4 Fish Impingement ..................................................................................................................137 7.5 Temperature Monitoring.........................................................................................................139 7.6 Deer Interactions with Traffic .................................................................................................140 8.0 CONCLUSION.......................................................................................................................143
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Thallium-201 for Medical Use. I
    THALLIUM-201 FOR MEDICAL USE. I E. Lebowitz, M. W. Greene, R. Fairchild, P. R. Bradley-Moore, H. 1. Atkins,A. N. Ansari, P. Richards,and E. Belgrave Brookhaven National Laboratory Thallium-201 merits evaluation for myocar tumors (7—9), the use of radiothallium should also dial visualization, kidney studies, and tumor be evaluated for this application. diagnosis because of its physical and biologic Thallium-201 decays by electron capture with a properties. A method is described for prepara 73-hr half-life. It emits mercury K-x-rays of 69—83 tion of this radiopharmaceutical for human use. keY in 98% abundance plus gamma rays of I 35 and A critical evaluation of 501T1 and other radio 167 keV in 10% total abundance. Because of its pharmaceuticals for myocardial visualization is good shelf-life, photon energies, and mode of decay, given. 201T1was the radioisotope of thallium chosen for development. Thallium-20 1 is a potentially useful radioisotope MATERIALS AND METHODS for various medical applications including myocardial Thallium-201 is produced by irradiating a natural visualization and possible assessment of physiology, thallium target in the external beam of the 60-in. as a renal medullary imaging agent, and for tumor Brookhaven cyclotron with 3 1-MeV protons. The detection. nuclear reaction is 203Tl(p,3n)201Pb. Lead-201 has The use of radiothallium in nuclear medicine was a half-life of 9.4 hr and is the parent of 201T1.The first suggested by Kawana, et al (1 ) . In terms of thallium target, fabricated from an ingot of 99.999% organ distribution (2) and neurophysiologic function pure natural thallium metal (29.5% isotopic abun (3), thallium is biologically similar to potassium.
    [Show full text]
  • Potassium-40 What Is It? Potassium Is a Soft, Silver-White Metal
    Human Health Fact Sheet ANL, October 2001 Potassium-40 What Is It? Potassium is a soft, silver-white metal. An important constituent of soil, it is widely distributed in nature and is present in all Symbol: K(-40) plant and animal tissues. Potassium-40 is a naturally occurring Atomic Number: 19 radioactive isotope of potassium. (An isotope is a different form of an (protons in nucleus) element that has the same number of protons in the nucleus but a different number of neutrons.) Two stable (nonradioactive) isotopes of Atomic Weight: 39 potassium exist, potassium-39 and potassium-41. Potassium-39 (naturally occurring) comprises most (about 93%) of naturally occurring potassium, and potassium-41 accounts for essentially all the rest. Radioactive postassium-40 comprises a very small fraction (about 0.012%) of naturally occurring potassium. Several radioactive isotopes of potassium exist in addition to potassium-40. These isotopes all have half- lives of less than one day Radioactive Properties of Potassium-40 so they are not Natural Specific Radiation Energy (MeV) Half-Life Decay of concern for Isotope Abundance Activity (yr) Mode Alpha Beta Gamma Department of (%) (Ci/g) (α) (β) (γ) Energy (DOE) K-40 1.3 billion 0.012 0.0000071 β, EC - 0.52 0.16 environmental management EC = electron capture, Ci = curie, g = gram, and MeV = million electron volts; a dash means sites such as that the entry is not applicable. (See the companion fact sheet on Radioactive Properties, Hanford. The Internal Distribution, and Risk Coefficients for explanation of terms and interpretation of radiation energies.) Potassium-40 decays by both emitting a beta particle (89%) and electron half-life of capture (11%).
    [Show full text]
  • THE NATURAL RADIOACTIVITY of the BIOSPHERE (Prirodnaya Radioaktivnost' Iosfery)
    XA04N2887 INIS-XA-N--259 L.A. Pertsov TRANSLATED FROM RUSSIAN Published for the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission and the National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C. by the Israel Program for Scientific Translations L. A. PERTSOV THE NATURAL RADIOACTIVITY OF THE BIOSPHERE (Prirodnaya Radioaktivnost' iosfery) Atomizdat NMoskva 1964 Translated from Russian Israel Program for Scientific Translations Jerusalem 1967 18 02 AEC-tr- 6714 Published Pursuant to an Agreement with THE U. S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION and THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION, WASHINGTON, D. C. Copyright (D 1967 Israel Program for scientific Translations Ltd. IPST Cat. No. 1802 Translated and Edited by IPST Staff Printed in Jerusalem by S. Monison Available from the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information Springfield, Va. 22151 VI/ Table of Contents Introduction .1..................... Bibliography ...................................... 5 Chapter 1. GENESIS OF THE NATURAL RADIOACTIVITY OF THE BIOSPHERE ......................... 6 § Some historical problems...................... 6 § 2. Formation of natural radioactive isotopes of the earth ..... 7 §3. Radioactive isotope creation by cosmic radiation. ....... 11 §4. Distribution of radioactive isotopes in the earth ........ 12 § 5. The spread of radioactive isotopes over the earth's surface. ................................. 16 § 6. The cycle of natural radioactive isotopes in the biosphere. ................................ 18 Bibliography ................ .................. 22 Chapter 2. PHYSICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF NATURAL RADIOACTIVE ISOTOPES. ........... 24 § 1. The contribution of individual radioactive isotopes to the total radioactivity of the biosphere. ............... 24 § 2. Properties of radioactive isotopes not belonging to radio- active families . ............ I............ 27 § 3. Properties of radioactive isotopes of the radioactive families. ................................ 38 § 4. Properties of radioactive isotopes of rare-earth elements .
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download
    Earth and Planetary Science Letters 539 (2020) 116192 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Earth and Planetary Science Letters www.elsevier.com/locate/epsl Potassium isotope fractionation during chemical weathering of basalts ∗ Heng Chen a,b, , Xiao-Ming Liu c, Kun Wang ( ) a a Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Washington University in St Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA b Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, NY 10964, USA c Department of Geological Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Non-traditional stable isotopes (e.g., Li, Mg, and Si) are increasingly used as tracers for studying Earth’s Received 26 February 2019 surface processes. The isotopes of potassium (K), a highly soluble and mobile element during weathering, Received in revised form 24 February 2020 could be a promising new tracer for continental weathering; however, the K isotopic variations in Accepted 28 February 2020 weathering profile has not been directly studied due to previous analytical difficulties. Recent high- Available online 30 March 2020 precision measurements revealed that K isotopes in global river waters are fractionated from the Bulk Editor: L. Derry Silicate Earth (BSE) value, indicating they are influenced by chemical weathering of the crust. Isotopic Keywords: fractionation during chemical weathering is one of several processes that could ultimately lead to 41 potassium isotopes ∼0.6 difference of δ K between the BSE and modern seawater. In order to determine the direction chemical weathering and controlling factors of K isotopic fractionation during basalt weathering, especially under intense basalt weathering conditions, we measured K isotopic compositions in two sets of bauxite developed on the clay minerals Columbia River Basalts, together with fresh parental basalt and aeolian deposit samples using a recently global potassium cycle developed high-precision method.
    [Show full text]
  • Doubt of the Radioactivity of Potassium and Rubidium Gations of Thomson
    628 CHEMISTR Y: HARKINS AND GUY PRtOC. N. A. S., The later separation of the light fraction reported here was undertaken by Francis Jenkins and the writer in order to obtain a sufficient separation to make it possible to investigate the shift in the spectrum of isotopes with a change of atomic weight, as discovered by Harkins and Aronberg' for lead. They showed a difference of 0.0048 Angstrom unit difference in the wave-length of the line 4057A as produced by a difference of t/25o in the atomic weight between ordinary lead and lead produced by the disintegra- tion of uranium. The relative difference in the case of chlorine is one. part in 373, and it is probable that the magnitude of the similar effect may be discovered for this element. This is important since the cause of the effect and its variation with the atomic weight are unknown. Furthermore this is the only difference in the chemical nature of isotopes which has been discovered, so it is important to determine its origin. I J. J. Thomson, Address to the Royal Institution, Jan. 17, 1913. 2 Harkins, W. D., Physic. Rev., 15, 74 (1920); Harkins, W. D. and Broeker, C. E., Nature, 105, 230-1 (1920); Science, N. S., 51, 289-91 (1920); Harkins and Hall, R. E., J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 1390, 1391, 1387 (1916). (Notice of Beginning of Separation.) J Harkins, W. D. and Wilson, E. D., these PROCuZDINGS, 1, 276-82 (1915); J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 37, 1367-1421 (1915); Phil. Mag., 30, 723-34 (1915).
    [Show full text]
  • The Elements.Pdf
    A Periodic Table of the Elements at Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos National Laboratory's Chemistry Division Presents Periodic Table of the Elements A Resource for Elementary, Middle School, and High School Students Click an element for more information: Group** Period 1 18 IA VIIIA 1A 8A 1 2 13 14 15 16 17 2 1 H IIA IIIA IVA VA VIAVIIA He 1.008 2A 3A 4A 5A 6A 7A 4.003 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 Li Be B C N O F Ne 6.941 9.012 10.81 12.01 14.01 16.00 19.00 20.18 11 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 3 Na Mg IIIB IVB VB VIB VIIB ------- VIII IB IIB Al Si P S Cl Ar 22.99 24.31 3B 4B 5B 6B 7B ------- 1B 2B 26.98 28.09 30.97 32.07 35.45 39.95 ------- 8 ------- 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 4 K Ca Sc Ti V Cr Mn Fe Co Ni Cu Zn Ga Ge As Se Br Kr 39.10 40.08 44.96 47.88 50.94 52.00 54.94 55.85 58.47 58.69 63.55 65.39 69.72 72.59 74.92 78.96 79.90 83.80 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 5 Rb Sr Y Zr NbMo Tc Ru Rh PdAgCd In Sn Sb Te I Xe 85.47 87.62 88.91 91.22 92.91 95.94 (98) 101.1 102.9 106.4 107.9 112.4 114.8 118.7 121.8 127.6 126.9 131.3 55 56 57 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 6 Cs Ba La* Hf Ta W Re Os Ir Pt AuHg Tl Pb Bi Po At Rn 132.9 137.3 138.9 178.5 180.9 183.9 186.2 190.2 190.2 195.1 197.0 200.5 204.4 207.2 209.0 (210) (210) (222) 87 88 89 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 114 116 118 7 Fr Ra Ac~RfDb Sg Bh Hs Mt --- --- --- --- --- --- (223) (226) (227) (257) (260) (263) (262) (265) (266) () () () () () () http://pearl1.lanl.gov/periodic/ (1 of 3) [5/17/2001 4:06:20 PM] A Periodic Table of the Elements at Los Alamos National Laboratory 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 Lanthanide Series* Ce Pr NdPmSm Eu Gd TbDyHo Er TmYbLu 140.1 140.9 144.2 (147) 150.4 152.0 157.3 158.9 162.5 164.9 167.3 168.9 173.0 175.0 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 Actinide Series~ Th Pa U Np Pu AmCmBk Cf Es FmMdNo Lr 232.0 (231) (238) (237) (242) (243) (247) (247) (249) (254) (253) (256) (254) (257) ** Groups are noted by 3 notation conventions.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of Radioactivity in Military Clothes Commonly Used in Armed Force
    ^±xji\ ij^A .jit *uil ^ u j Sudan Academy of Sciences (SAS) Atomic Energy Council Investigation of Radioactivity in Military Clothes commonly used in Armed Force By Wahba Mohammed Fadul Almola Zaid A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment o f the requirements for the degree of Master o f Radiation and Environmental Protection Supervisor: Dr. Isam Salih Mohamed October 2011 Investigation of Radioactivity in Military Clothes commonly used in Armed Force By Wahba Mohammed Fadul Almola Zaid Examination committee Title Name Signature External Examiner Prof. Mohammed Osman Sid Ahmed .'V ; Supervisor Dr. Isam Salih Mohammed Internal Examiner Mr. Ammar Mohammed Alamin Date of examination 24.11.2011 Dedication My mother Father Brothers Sisters Colleagues To all those whom I love ACKNOWLEDGEMENT It is a great pleasure to thank everyone who helped me write my dissertation .1 am sincerely and heartily grateful to my advisor,Dr. Isam Salih the guide advice with attention andhe showed care, me throughout dissertationmy writing. Besides I would like to thank to my colleagueFreed Fadllallah and Saher I Esa.would like to thankHatem Eltayeb and saher, those helped me in doing the practical (laboratory of protection of the environment). I express my thanks all staff of Sudan Academy of Sciences (SAS) Atomic Energy Council especially Hago Idriss. I would Also like to show my gratitude to my friend in ArmedLieutenant force Colonel Ashraf. I thank everyone who helped me. Finally the biggest thanks for my mother and father , I am sure it would have not been possible without their help. CONTENTS ABESTRACT................................................................................................................................................................... 2 W A ill..........................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Radiation in the Rocks, Soils, and Groundwater of Southern Florida with a Discussion on Potential Health Impacts
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Review Natural Radiation in the Rocks, Soils, and Groundwater of Southern Florida with a Discussion on Potential Health Impacts Thomas M. Missimer 1,* , Christopher Teaf 2, Robert G. Maliva 1,3, Ashley Danley-Thomson 4, Douglas Covert 5 and Michael Hegy 1 1 Emergent Technologies Institute, U. A. Whitaker College of Engineering, Florida Gulf Coast University, 16301 Innovation Lane, Fort Myers, FL 33901, USA; [email protected] (R.G.M.); [email protected] (M.H.) 2 Center for Biomedical and Toxicological Research, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32310, USA; [email protected] 3 WSP USA Inc., 1567 Hayley Lane, Suite 202, Fort Myers, FL 33907, USA; [email protected] 4 U. A. Whitaker College of Engineering, Department of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 10501 FGCU Boulevard South, Fort Myers, FL 33965-6565, USA; [email protected] 5 Hazardous Substance and Waste Management Research, 2976 Wellington Circle West, Tallahassee, FL 32309, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-239-745-4538 Received: 8 April 2019; Accepted: 14 May 2019; Published: 21 May 2019 Abstract: Southern Florida is underlain by rocks and sediments that naturally contain radioactive isotopes. The primary origin of the radioactive isotopes is Miocene-aged phosphate deposits that can be enriched in uranium-238 and its daughter isotopes. Nodular phosphate containing radionuclides from the Miocene has been reworked into younger formations and is ubiquitous in southern Florida. When the nodular phosphate is exposed to groundwater with geochemical conditions favorable for its dissolution, uranium, radium, and radon may be released into the groundwater system.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemistry Regents Review NAME__Jean M
    Chemistry Regents Review NAME__Jean M. Green_____ “IN TERMS OF…” Two isotopes of potassium are listed below. 37 K 42 K 1. State one similarity between potassium-37 and potassium-42 in terms of subatomic particles. potassium-37 and potassium-42 have the same number of protons 2. In terms of subatomic particles, state one difference. potassium-37 and potassium-42 have different numbers of neutrons 3. Compare 37 K and 42 K in terms of radioactive decay. 37 K and 42 K have different decay modes -or- 37 K is positron decay and 42 K is beta decay 4. In terms of half life, how are 37 K and 42 K different? 37 K and 42 K have different half lives -or- 37 K has a half life of 1.23 seconds and 42 K has a half life of 12.4 hrs __________________________________________________ Given the following equilibrium reaction: N2 + 3 H2 2 N H3 + heat 5. In terms of the collision theory, state why adding extra N2 produces more NH3 more N2 molecules means more molecules present to potentially collide, thus producing more NH3 6. In terms of LeChatelier’s principle, state why adding extra N2 produces more NH3 adding N2 makes the equilibrium reaction shift to relieve this stress, thus producing more NH3 _________________________________________________ 7. In terms of ground state, excited state, and energy transitions, explain how a bright line spectrum is produced. When an electron returns to the ground state from the excited state, energy is released, thus producing a visible bright line spectrum (or some variation thereunto) ______________________________________ 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of Analysis: Milford and Delta, UT Air Filter Samples
    Friday, July 20 Report of Analysis: Milford and Delta, UT Air Filter Samples _______________ Performed for the Desert Research Institute Community Environmental Monitoring Program [DRI-CEMP] By the University of Nevada, Las Vegas Health Physics Department Radiation Services Laboratory [UNLV-RSL] I. Narrative Following contact with Mr. Jeff Tappen and Mr. Ted Hartwell of the Desert Research Institute (DRI) in Las Vegas, Nevada, it was arranged to send several air filter samples recently collected from the Milford and Delta, Utah, Community Environmental Monitoring Program (CEMP) stations to the University of Nevada - Radiation Services Laboratory (UNLV-RSL) for analysis by high-resolution gamma spectroscopy. The laboratory designations used for the five air filters received are described below. Several unused “blank” filters were also provided by DRI for quality assurance/quality control purposes (QA/QC). Sample Designations AF-1/UNLV: Milford, UT CEMP Station # 036 (week ending 7/9/07) AF-2/UNLV: Milford, UT CEMP Station #036 (week ending 7/9/07) – [duplicate] AF-3/UNLV: Delta, UT CEMP Station # 083 (week ending 7/9/07) AF-4/UNLV: Milford, UT CEMP Station # 036 (week ending 7/2/07)* AF-5/UNLV: Delta, UT CEMP Station # 083 (week ending 7/2/07) QA/QC [AF-B1, AF-B2, and, AF-B3: Background (unused) air filters]. * Note: an additional air filter sample (Milford duplicate filter for the week of 7/2/07) was also received, but only the primary air filter sample for this station was analyzed for this report. II. Methods Three co-axial, hyper-pure germanium detectors in the UNLV-RSL counting room (BHS- 105) were calibrated using a mixed gamma reference standard over a useful energy detection range of approximately 50 keV to 2,000 keV (emission lines from Am-241: 59.5 keV through Y-88: 1836 keV).
    [Show full text]
  • Atomic Mass Measurements of Short-Lived Nuclides Around the Doubly-Magic
    Atomic mass measurements of short-lived nuclides around the doubly-magic 208Pb C. Weber a,∗,1,2, G. Audi b, D. Beck a, K. Blaum a,c,3, G. Bollen d, F. Herfurth a,c, A. Kellerbauer a,4, H.-J. Kluge a,e, D. Lunney b, and S. Schwarz d aGesellschaft f¨ur Schwerionenforschung mbH, D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany bCSNSM-IN2P3/CNRS, Universit´ede Paris-Sud, F-91405 Orsay, France cCERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland dNSCL, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1321, USA eUniversit¨at Heidelberg, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany Abstract Accurate atomic mass measurements of neutron-deficient and neutron-rich nuclides around the doubly-magic 208Pb and of neutron-rich cesium isotopes were performed with the Penning trap mass spectrometer ISOLTRAP at ISOLDE/CERN. The masses of 145,147Cs, 181,183Tl, 186Tlm, 187Tl, 196Tlm, 205Tl, 197Pbm, 208Pb, 190−197Bi, 209,215,216Bi, 203,205,229Fr, and 214,229,230Ra were determined. The obtained relative mass uncertainty in the range of 2 · 10−7 to 2 · 10−8 is not only required for safe arXiv:0801.2068v1 [nucl-ex] 14 Jan 2008 identification of isomeric states but also allows mapping the detailed structure of the mass surface. A mass adjustment procedure was carried out and the results included into the Atomic Mass Evaluation. The resulting separation energies are discussed and the mass spectrometric and laser spectroscopic data are examined for possible correlations. Key words: atomic mass, binding energy, Penning trap, radionuclide, isomer, cesium, thallium, lead, bismuth, radium, francium PACS: 07.75.+h Mass spectrometers, 21.10.Dr Binding energies and masses, 27.70.+q 150 ≤ A ≤ 189, 27.80.+w 190 ≤ A ≤ 219, 27.90.+b 220 ≤ A Preprint submitted to Elsevier 22 October 2018 1 Introduction The accurate knowledge of atomic masses is required for many areas of physics [1,2].
    [Show full text]
  • Properties of Potassium
    Properties of Potassium T.G. Tiecke van der Waals-Zeeman institute University of Amsterdam The Netherlands v1.0 (February, 2010) 1 Introduction This document is a stand-alone version of the appendix on potasssium properties of my thesis [1]. It is meant to provide an overview of the properties of atomic potassium useful for experiments on ultracold gases. A thorough review of the properties of lithium has been given in the thesis of Michael Gehm [2, 3]. For the other alkali atoms extended reviews have been given for Na, Rb and Cs by Daniel Steck [4]. 2 General Properties Potassium is an alkali-metal denoted by the chemical symbol K and atomic number Z = 19. It has been discovered in 1807 by deriving it from potassium hydroxide KOH. Being an alkali atom it has only one electron in the outermost shell and the charge of the nucleus is being shielded by the core electrons. This makes the element very chemically reactive due to the relatively low ionization energy of the outermost electron. The basic physical properties of potassium are listed in Table 2. Potassium has a vapor pressure given in mbar by [5]: 1 3 OPTICAL PROPERTIES Mass number A Neutrons N Abundance (%) [6] m (u) [8] τ [9] I [9] 39 20 93.2581(44) 38.96370668(20) stable 3/2 40 21 0.0117(1) 39.96399848(21) 1.28 × 109 y 4 41 22 6.7302(44) 40.96182576(21) stable 3/2 Table 1: Naturally occurring isotopes of potassium. The atomic number of potassium is Z = 19.
    [Show full text]