DOCSLIB.ORG

Checklist of Yorkshire Coleoptera

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Checklist of Yorkshire Coleoptera Yorkshire Coleoptera Checklist 2020 Checklist of Yorkshire Coleoptera Figures are based on records on the YNU database in February 2020 The following checklist and the Family order in which it is laid out are based on Checklist of Beetles of the British Isles, 3rd Edition (2018), edited by A.G. Duff, and published by Pemberley Books. (To search for a species use Ctrl+F) Species VC61 VC62 VC63 VC64 VC65 County 2 Gyrinidae Gyrinus aeratus Stephens, 1835 17 0 2 0 0 19 Gyrinus caspius Ménétries, 1832 12 11 2 0 0 25 Gyrinus distinctus Aubé, 1838 14 1 10 3 0 28 Gyrinus marinus Gyllenhal, 1808 95 13 55 20 2 185 Gyrinus minutus Fabricius, 1798 0 2 3 0 0 5 Gyrinus paykulli Ochs, 1927 9 4 14 6 0 33 Gyrinus substriatus Stephens, 1828 157 135 297 130 79 798 Gyrinus urinator Illiger, 1807 35 35 10 10 2 92 Orectochilus villosus (Müller, O.F., 1776) 12 55 6 99 56 228 3 Haliplidae Brychius elevatus (Panzer, 1793) 26 36 17 14 8 101 Peltodytes caesus (Duftschmid, 1805) 0 0 2 0 0 2 Haliplus ruficollis agg. 7 1 22 1 0 31 Haliplus apicalis Thomson, C.G., 1868 25 9 2 3 0 39 Haliplus flavicollis Sturm, 1834 60 28 74 45 33 240 Haliplus fluviatilis Aubé, 1836 67 27 137 24 11 266 Haliplus fulvus (Fabricius, 1801) 12 11 18 10 11 62 Haliplus heydeni Wehncke, 1875 52 16 86 46 2 202 Haliplus immaculatus Gerhardt, 1877 113 31 183 50 11 388 Haliplus laminatus (Schaller, 1783) 1 2 35 10 1 49 Haliplus lineatocollis (Marsham, 1802) 312 146 290 110 56 914 Haliplus lineolatus Mannerheim, 1844 54 18 59 32 18 181 Haliplus mucronatus Stephens, 1828 2 0 2 0 0 4 Haliplus obliquus (Fabricius, 1787) 55 35 41 46 33 210 Haliplus ruficollis (De Geer, 1774) 193 173 399 151 61 977 Haliplus sibiricus Motschulsky, 1860 389 193 359 145 91 1177 Haliplus variegatus Sturm, 1834 1 1 2 0 0 4 Haliplus confinis Stephens, 1828 50 36 83 37 18 224 4 Noteridae Noterus clavicornis (De Geer, 1774) 290 170 452 176 38 1126 Noterus crassicornis (Müller, O.F., 1776) 39 28 35 3 0 105 1 Yorkshire Coleoptera Checklist 2020 5 Hygrobiidae Hygrobia hermanni (Fabricius, 1775) 50 27 88 32 14 211 6 Dytiscidae Boreonectes multilineatus (Falkenström, 1922) 0 0 0 8 12 20 Agabus affinis (Paykull, 1798) 26 80 79 35 22 242 Agabus arcticus (Paykull, 1798) 0 0 36 27 45 108 Agabus biguttatus (Olivier, 1795) 1 5 19 4 2 31 Agabus bipustulatus (Linnaeus, 1767) 667 687 1091 589 369 3403 Agabus congener (Thunberg, 1794) 9 21 25 48 63 166 Agabus conspersus (Marsham, 1802) 73 3 3 0 0 79 Agabus didymus (Olivier, 1795) 139 77 133 49 18 416 Agabus guttatus (Paykull, 1798) 15 136 208 126 100 585 Agabus labiatus (Brahm, 1790) 27 2 2 3 2 36 Agabus melanarius Aubé, 1837 2 89 10 1 1 103 Agabus nebulosus (Forster, 1771) 178 117 195 126 48 664 Agabus paludosus (Fabricius, 1801) 113 90 122 70 40 435 Agabus striolatus (Gyllenhal, 1808) 0 0 36 0 0 36 Agabus sturmii (Gyllenhal, 1808) 293 272 577 239 107 1488 Agabus uliginosus (Linnaeus, 1761) 88 54 43 48 4 237 Agabus undulatus (Schrank, 1776) 22 1 0 18 0 41 Agabus unguicularis (Thomson, C.G., 1867) 48 41 31 15 14 149 Ilybius aenescens Thomson, C.G., 1870 10 13 99 17 12 151 Ilybius ater (De Geer, 1774) 117 92 219 75 22 525 Ilybius chalconatus (Panzer, 1796) 47 79 44 61 10 241 Ilybius fenestratus (Fabricius, 1781) 36 21 49 8 1 115 Ilybius fuliginosus (Fabricius, 1792) 264 186 354 178 102 1084 Ilybius guttiger (Gyllenhal, 1808) 19 34 83 8 0 144 Ilybius montanus (Stephens, 1828) 97 144 140 40 62 483 Ilybius quadriguttatus (Lacordaire, 1835) 91 21 160 36 0 308 Ilybius subaeneus Erichson, 1837 9 4 24 6 0 43 Platambus maculatus (Linnaeus, 1758) 51 166 125 145 109 596 Colymbetes fuscus (Linnaeus, 1758) 335 173 388 145 39 1080 Rhantus bistriatus (Bergsträsser, 1778) 0 0 2 0 0 2 Rhantus exsoletus (Forster, 1771) 17 9 95 11 2 134 Rhantus frontalis (Marsham, 1802) 1 0 0 1 0 2 Rhantus grapii (Gyllenhal, 1808) 41 43 171 23 0 278 Rhantus suturalis (MacLeay, 1825) 126 57 152 62 7 404 Rhantus suturellus (Harris, T.W., 1828) 43 43 138 34 36 294 Liopterus haemorrhoidalis (Fabricius, 1787) 107 24 224 45 0 400 Acilius canaliculatus (Nicolai, 1822) 21 0 268 0 0 289 Acilius sulcatus (Linnaeus, 1758) 53 54 146 42 7 302 Dytiscus circumcinctus Ahrens, 1811 9 1 39 10 0 59 Dytiscus circumflexus Fabricius, 1801 36 16 53 11 1 117 Dytiscus dimidiatus Bergsträsser, 1778 1 1 3 11 0 16 Dytiscus marginalis Linnaeus, 1758 108 88 267 76 22 561 2 Yorkshire Coleoptera Checklist 2020 Dytiscus semisulcatus Müller, O.F., 1776 11 32 30 7 9 89 Hydaticus seminiger (De Geer, 1774) 0 0 0 4 0 4 Hydaticus transversalis (Pontoppidan, 1763) 0 0 2 7 0 9 Bidessus unistriatus (Goeze, 1777) 0 0 1 0 0 1 Hydroglyphus geminus (Fabricius, 1792) 68 45 126 53 10 302 Deronectes latus (Stephens, 1829) 0 6 2 2 3 13 Graptodytes bilineatus (Sturm, 1835) 11 0 0 0 0 11 Graptodytes granularis (Linnaeus, 1767) 30 22 34 7 0 93 Graptodytes pictus (Fabricius, 1787) 195 42 289 51 0 577 Hydroporus angustatus Sturm, 1835 233 163 326 148 16 886 Hydroporus discretus Fairmaire & Brisout de Barneville, 1859 57 72 50 54 38 271 Hydroporus erythrocephalus (Linnaeus, 1758) 111 90 237 91 46 575 Hydroporus ferrugineus Stephens, 1829 0 14 11 11 5 41 Hydroporus glabriusculus Aubé, 1838 0 0 0 1 0 1 Hydroporus gyllenhalii Schiödte, 1841 157 361 492 308 257 1575 Hydroporus incognitus Sharp, 1869 142 211 376 163 69 961 Hydroporus longicornis Sharp, 1871 0 38 22 18 9 87 Hydroporus longulus Mulsant & Rey, 1861 5 56 21 20 14 116 Hydroporus marginatus (Duftschmid, 1805) 0 0 1 0 0 1 Hydroporus melanarius Sturm, 1835 31 102 147 115 92 487 Hydroporus memnonius Nicolai, 1822 161 244 179 135 82 801 Hydroporus morio Aubé, 1838 0 26 41 90 118 275 Hydroporus neglectus Schaum, 1845 65 66 136 25 2 294 Hydroporus nigrita (Fabricius, 1792) 45 150 107 119 129 550 Hydroporus obscurus Sturm, 1835 9 48 140 34 39 270 Hydroporus obsoletus Aubé, 1838 0 4 1 1 1 7 Hydroporus palustris (Linnaeus, 1761) 380 273 675 253 140 1721 Hydroporus planus (Fabricius, 1782) 584 402 506 285 79 1856 Hydroporus pubescens (Gyllenhal, 1808) 220 382 686 323 276 1887 Hydroporus rufifrons (Müller, O.F., 1776) 0 4 4 8 0 16 Hydroporus scalesianus Stephens, 1828 5 0 4 3 0 12 Hydroporus striola (Gyllenhal, 1826) 42 28 102 41 12 225 Hydroporus tessellatus (Drapiez, 1819) 161 94 137 59 3 454 Hydroporus tristis (Paykull, 1798) 81 175 303 193 168 920 Hydroporus umbrosus (Gyllenhal, 1808) 54 97 82 43 34 310 Nebrioporus depressus agg. 0 1 0 0 0 1 Nebrioporus assimilis (Paykull, 1798) 37 7 47 26 9 126 Nebrioporus depressus (Fabricius, 1775) 0 0 0 1 0 1 Nebrioporus elegans (Panzer, 1794) 145 157 160 126 111 699 Oreodytes davisii (Curtis, 1831) 0 11 18 31 46 106 Oreodytes sanmarkii (Sahlberg, C.R., 1826) 30 181 155 194 166 726 Oreodytes septentrionalis (Gyllenhal, 1826) 0 9 3 38 65 115 Porhydrus lineatus (Fabricius, 1775) 23 4 23 8 0 58 Scarodytes halensis (Fabricius, 1787) 10 0 14 5 0 29 Stictonectes lepidus (Olivier, 1795) 7 5 98 31 1 142 3 Yorkshire Coleoptera Checklist 2020 Stictotarsus duodecimpustulatus (Fabricius, 1792) 36 42 50 40 26 194 Suphrodytes dorsalis (Fabricius, 1787) 2 0 1 3 0 6 Suphrodytes dorsalis (Fabricius, 1787) 84 24 36 47 7 198 Suphrodytes figuratus (Gyllenhal, 1826) 5 0 7 0 0 12 Hygrotus confluens (Fabricius, 1787) 52 27 45 21 19 164 Hygrotus decoratus (Gyllenhal, 1810) 25 40 34 12 1 112 Hygrotus impressopunctatus (Schaller, 1783) 279 130 367 149 25 950 Hygrotus inaequalis (Fabricius, 1777) 248 157 368 152 35 960 Hygrotus nigrolineatus (Steven, 1808) 11 0 14 4 8 37 Hygrotus novemlineatus (Stephens, 1829) 0 2 0 0 5 7 Hygrotus parallelogrammus (Ahrens, 1812) 12 0 0 0 0 12 Hygrotus quinquelineatus (Zetterstedt, 1828) 1 0 8 1 0 10 Hygrotus versicolor (Schaller, 1783) 80 5 99 28 10 222 Hyphydrus ovatus (Linnaeus, 1761) 167 60 370 79 18 694 Laccornis oblongus (Stephens, 1835) 12 3 0 9 0 24 Laccophilus hyalinus (De Geer, 1774) 95 21 81 39 6 242 Laccophilus minutus (Linnaeus, 1758) 215 129 345 169 58 916 Laccophilus poecilus Klug, 1834 0 0 6 0 0 6 7 Carabidae Cicindela campestris Linnaeus, 1758 16 94 269 19 19 417 Brachinus crepitans (Linnaeus, 1758) 0 0 1 0 0 1 Calosoma inquisitor (Linnaeus, 1758) 0 0 1 0 2 3 Carabus arvensis Herbst, 1784 2 50 2 9 3 66 Carabus auratus Linnaeus, 1761 0 0 0 1 0 1 Carabus glabratus Paykull, 1790 0 14 1 0 3 18 Carabus granulatus Linnaeus, 1758 52 6 73 6 0 137 Carabus granulatus subsp. granulatus Linnaeus, 1758 0 0 1 0 0 1 Carabus monilis Fabricius, 1792 4 10 11 13 0 38 Carabus nemoralis Müller, O.F., 1764 16 58 53 38 6 171 Carabus nitens Linnaeus, 1758 2 86 22 9 26 145 Carabus problematicus Herbst, 1786 8 182 144 32 31 397 Carabus violaceus Linnaeus, 1758 10 96 82 34 17 239 Cychrus caraboides (Linnaeus, 1758) 7 36 134 43 14 234 Leistus ferrugineus (Linnaeus, 1758) 43 30 146 24 0 243 Leistus fulvibarbis Dejean, 1826 23 11 98 42 6 180 Leistus rufomarginatus (Duftschmid, 1812) 15 8 49 7 0 79 Leistus spinibarbis (Fabricius, 1775) 15 19 48 5 2 89 Leistus terminatus (Hellwig in Panzer, 1793) 28 122 131 54 8 343 Nebria brevicollis (Fabricius, 1792) 55 113 384 139 36 727 Nebria livida (Linnaeus, 1758) 12 6 0 0 0 18 Nebria rufescens Strøm, 1768 0 22 35 38 17 112 Nebria salina Fairmaire & Laboulbène, 1854 8 94 73 42 18 235 Notiophilus aesthuans Motschulsky, 1864 1 0 0 1 6 8 Notiophilus aquaticus (Linnaeus, 1758) 5 99 47 14 14 179 Notiophilus biguttatus (Fabricius, 1779) 123 105 456 124 41 849 4 Yorkshire Coleoptera Checklist 2020 Notiophilus germinyi Fauvel, 1863 3 65 31 22 13 134 Notiophilus palustris (Duftschmid, 1812) 17 15 84 16 2 134 Notiophilus quadripunctatus Dejean, 1826 4 3 5 0 0 12 Notiophilus rufipes Curtis, 1829 2 2 14 3 0 21 Notiophilus substriatus Waterhouse, G.R., 1833
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Three New Anchomenus BONELLI, 1810 from the West Palaearctic (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Platynini)
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Koleopterologische Rundschau Jahr/Year: 2014 Band/Volume: 84_2014 Autor(en)/Author(s): Schmidt Joachim Artikel/Article: Three new Anchomenus Bonelli, 1810 from the West Palaearctic. 13- 29 ©Wiener Coleopterologenverein (WCV), download unter www.zobodat.at Koleopterologische Rundschau 84 13–29 Wien, September 2014 Three new Anchomenus BONELLI, 1810 from the West Palaearctic (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Platynini) J. SCHMIDT Abstract Two new species of Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Platynini) are described: Anchomenus bellus sp.n. from southern and eastern Turkey, and A. alcedo sp.n. from northern Israel and Lebanon. In external characters they are very similar to the western Turkey endemic A. dohrnii FAIRMAIRE, 1866, but differ distinctly each in male genitalic characters. A third new species of Anchomenus BONELLI is described from eastern Afghanistan: A. kataevi sp.n. The relationships of the new species are briefly discussed, and a key to the Palaearctic representatives of the genus Anchomenus is pro- vided. Anchomenus dorsalis infuscatus CHEVROLAT, 1854, formerly considered a junior synonym of A. dorsalis PONTOPPIDAN, 1763, is here regarded as a good subspecies. Key words: Coleoptera, Carabidae, Platynini, Anchomenus, Afghanistan, Israel, Syria, Lebanon, Turkey, new species, key to species. Introduction Based on comprehensive morphological and phylogenetic analyses of adult and larval
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Metabarcoding Diet Analysis Reveals Dynamic Feeding Behaviour and Biological Control Potential of Carabid Farmland Co
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/332312; this version posted May 27, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Title: DNA metabarcoding diet analysis reveals dynamic feeding behaviour and biological 2 control potential of carabid farmland communities 3 4 5 STEFANIYA KAMENOVA1,2,3, VINCENT BRETAGNOLLE2, MANUEL 6 PLANTEGENEST1 & ELSA CANARD1 7 8 1UMR 1349 IGEPP, INRA, Université de Rennes 1, Agrocampus Ouest Rennes, Domaine de 9 la Motte, 35650 Le Rheu, France 10 2Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, 79360 Villiers-en-Bois, France 11 3CEES, University of Oslo, 1066 Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway 12 13 Corresponding author: Stefaniya Kamenova 14 CEES, University of Oslo, 1066 Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway 15 [email protected] 16 17 18 Key-words: DNA metabarcoding diet analysis, carabid beetles, agroecosystems, biological 19 control, food webs 20 21 Running title: Dynamic feeding behaviour of carabid beetles revealed by DNA 22 metabarcoding 23 24 25 Abstract 26 27 Maximizing the delivery of key ecosystem services such as biological control through the 28 management of natural enemy communities is one of the major challenges for modern 29 agriculture. The main obstacle lies in our yet limited capacity of identifying the factors that 30 drive the dynamics of trophic interactions within multi-species assemblages. Invertebrate 31 generalist predators like carabid beetles are known for their dynamic feeding behaviour.
    [Show full text]
  • Dartington Report on Beetles 2015
    Report on beetles (Coleoptera) collected from the Dartington Hall Estate, 2015 by Dr Martin Luff 1. Introduction and Methods The majority of beetle recording in 2015 was concentrated on three sites and habitats: 1. Further sampling of moss on the Deer Park wall (SX794635), as mentioned in my 2014 report. This was done on two dates in March by MLL and again in October, aided by Messrs Tony Allen and Clive Turner, both experienced coleopterists. 2. Beetles associated with the decomposing body of a dead deer. The recently (accidentally) killed deer was acquired on 12th May by Mike Newby who pegged it out under wire netting in the small wood adjacent to 'Flushing Meadow', here referred to as 'Flushing Copse' (SX802625). The body was lifted regularly and beaten over a collecting tray, initially every week, then fortnightly and then monthly until early October. In addition, two pitfall traps were installed just beside the corpse, with a small amount of preservative in each. These were emptied each time the site was visited. 3. Water beetles sampled on 28th October, together with Tony Allen and Clive Turner, from the ponds and wheel-rut puddles on Berryman's Marsh (SX799615). Other work again included the contents of the nest boxes from Dartington Hills and Berrymans Marsh at the end of October, thanks to Mike Newby and his volunteer helpers. 2. Results In all, 203 beetle species were recorded in 2015, of which 85 (41.8%) were additions to the Dartington list. This increase over the 32% new in 2014 (Luff, 2015) results partly from sampling habitats (carrion, fresh-water) not previously examined.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of Three Horticultural Farms in Lombardy, Northern Italy ()
    Boll. Zool. agr. Bachic. 31 dicembre 2007 Ser. II, 39 (3): 193-209 D. LUPI, M. COLOMBO, S. FACCHINI The ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of three horticultural farms in Lombardy, Northern Italy () Abstract - Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) were surveyed across three hor- ticultural farms, located in a peri-urban area, in the Po plain in Lombardy (Northern Italy) from April 2003 to March 2005. Their biodiversity was estimated using pitfall traps. A total of 29 genera and 39 species were collected. Notes on ants and spiders presence were also furnished. Land use seemed to have a significant effect on the number and composition of the species: catches were lower in the conventional farm and higher in biological farms. Apart from land use, all the species detected have already been recorded as frequent in agricultural fields and are characteristic of lowland agroecosystem in Northern Italy. Riassunto - I Coleotteri Carabidi di tre aziende orticole lombarde Si riferisce di un’indagine biennale (aprile 2003 - marzo 2005) effettuata sui Co- leotteri Carabidi di tre aziende orticole lombarde inserite in un contesto periurbano nella Pianura Padana. La biodiversità di tale famiglia è stata stimata utilizzando trappole a caduta. È stato catturato un totale di 39 specie afferenti a 29 generi. Vengono fornite indicazioni anche dei formicidi e ragni catturati nelle stesse trap- pole. La gestione aziendale sembra aver avuto un ruolo significativo sul numero e sulla composizione delle specie: le catture erano significativamente più basse nell’azienda convenzionale rispetto a quelle biologiche. Indipendentemente dalla gestione aziendale le specie catturate sono comunque comuni nei campi coltivati e caratteristiche degli agroecosistemi del nord Italia.
    [Show full text]
  • Rote Liste Ka Fer Band 2 Landesnaturschutzgesetz
    Ministerium für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein Die Käfer Schleswig-Holsteins Rote Liste Band 2 Herausgeber: Ministerium für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein (MLUR) Erarbeitung durch: Landesamt für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein Hamburger Chaussee 25 24220 Flintbek Tel.: 0 43 47 / 704-0 www.llur.schleswig-holstein.de Ansprechpartner: Arne Drews (Tel. 0 43 47 / 704-360) Autoren: Stephan Gürlich Roland Suikat Wolfgang Ziegler Titelfoto: Macroplea mutica (RL 1), Langklauen-Rohrblattkäfer, 7 mm, Familie Blattkäfer, Unterfamilie Schilfkäfer galt bereits als ausgestorben. Die Art konnte aber in neuerer Zeit in den Seegraswiesen der Orther Reede auf Fehmarn wieder nachgewiesen werden. Die Käferart vollzieht ihren gesamten Lebenszyklus vollständig submers und gehört gleichzeitig zu den ganz wenigen Insektenarten, die im Salzwasser leben können. Dieses einzige an der schleswig-hol- steinischen Ostseeküste bekannte Vorkommen ist in den dortigen Flachwasserzonen durch Wassersport gefährdet. (Foto: R. Suikat) Herstellung: Pirwitz Druck & Design, Kronshagen Dezember 2011 ISBN: 978-3-937937-54-0 Schriftenreihe: LLUR SH – Natur - RL 23 Band 2 von 3 Diese Broschüre wurde auf Recyclingpapier hergestellt. Diese Druckschrift wird im Rahmen der Öffentlichkeitsarbeit der schleswig- holsteinischen Landesregierung heraus- gegeben. Sie darf weder von Parteien noch von Personen, die Wahlwerbung oder Wahlhilfe betreiben, im Wahl- kampf zum Zwecke der Wahlwerbung verwendet werden. Auch ohne zeit- lichen Bezug zu einer bevorstehenden Wahl darf die Druckschrift nicht in einer Weise verwendet werden, die als Partei- nahme der Landesregierung zu Gunsten einzelner Gruppen verstanden werden könnte. Den Parteien ist es gestattet, die Druckschrift zur Unterrichtung ihrer eigenen Mitglieder zu verwenden.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological-Control-Programmes-In
    Biological Control Programmes in Canada 2001–2012 This page intentionally left blank Biological Control Programmes in Canada 2001–2012 Edited by P.G. Mason1 and D.R. Gillespie2 1Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; 2Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Agassiz, British Columbia, Canada iii CABI is a trading name of CAB International CABI Head Offi ce CABI Nosworthy Way 38 Chauncey Street Wallingford Suite 1002 Oxfordshire OX10 8DE Boston, MA 02111 UK USA Tel: +44 (0)1491 832111 T: +1 800 552 3083 (toll free) Fax: +44 (0)1491 833508 T: +1 (0)617 395 4051 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.cabi.org Chapters 1–4, 6–11, 15–17, 19, 21, 23, 25–28, 30–32, 34–36, 39–42, 44, 46–48, 52–56, 60–61, 64–71 © Crown Copyright 2013. Reproduced with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery. Remaining chapters © CAB International 2013. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electroni- cally, mechanically, by photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owners. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library, London, UK. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Biological control programmes in Canada, 2001-2012 / [edited by] P.G. Mason and D.R. Gillespie. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-78064-257-4 (alk. paper) 1. Insect pests--Biological control--Canada. 2. Weeds--Biological con- trol--Canada. 3. Phytopathogenic microorganisms--Biological control- -Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Impact of Diabrotica Resistant Bt-Maize Expressing Cry3bb1 on Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae)
    Potential impact of Diabrotica resistant Bt-maize expressing Cry3Bb1 on ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) Von der Fakultät für Mathematik, Informatik und Naturwissenschaften der RWTH Aachen University zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften genehmigte Dissertation vorgelegt von Diplom-Biologe Kai Uwe Priesnitz aus Iserlohn Berichter: Universitätsprofessor Dr. Alan Slusarenko Universitätsprofessor Dr. Ingolf Schuphan Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 17.12.2010 Diese Dissertation ist auf den Internetseiten der Hochschulbibliothek online verfügbar. Contents 1 Introduction ....................................................................................1 2 General background ......................................................................4 2.1 Ecology and biology of maize and its role in agriculture .......................... 4 2.1.1 Botanical characteristics and systematics of Zea mays ......................................4 2.1.2 Domestication of Maize .......................................................................................5 2.1.3 Maize as genetically modified crop......................................................................8 2.1.4 Event MON 88017: A herbicide tolerant Bt-maize protected against Diabrotica virgifera virgifera..................................................................................................9 2.2 Diabrotica virgifera virgifera: A major pest in maize............................... 11 2.3 Ground beetles: Widespread epigeal arthropods on arable
    [Show full text]
  • Using Species Traits to Understand the Mechanisms Driving Pollination and Pest Control Ecosystem Services
    Using species traits to understand the mechanisms driving pollination and pest control ecosystem services Arran Greenop (B.Sc., MRes) March 2020 Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Contents Summary ...................................................................................................................... iv List of figures ................................................................................................................. v List of tables .................................................................................................................. vi Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................... viii Declarations ................................................................................................................. viii Statement of authorship ................................................................................................ ix 1. Chapter 1. Thesis introduction ....................................................................................... 1 1.1. Background ............................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Thesis outline ............................................................................................................ 8 2. Chapter 2. Functional diversity positively affects prey suppression by invertebrate predators: a meta-analysis .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Scher Koleopterologen in Die Nördliche Oberrheinebene 2006 91-132 © Entomologischer Verein Stuttgart E.V.;Download 91
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Mitteilungen des Entomologischen Vereins Stuttgart Jahr/Year: 2010 Band/Volume: 45_2010 Autor(en)/Author(s): Knapp Horst, Rheinheimer Joachim Artikel/Article: Ergebnisse der Exkursion der Arbeitsgemeinschaft südwestdeutscher Koleopterologen in die nördliche Oberrheinebene 2006 91-132 © Entomologischer Verein Stuttgart e.V.;download www.zobodat.at 91 Ergebnisse der Exkursion der Arbeitsgemeinschaft südwestdeut- scher Koleopterologen in die nördliche Oberrheinebene 2006 Horst Knapp, Karlsruhe & Joachim Rheinheimer, Ludwigshafen Einleitung Ziel der jährlichen Exkursionen des Entomologischen Vereins Stuttgart ist die möglichst fl ä c h endeckende Erfassung der Käferfauna BadenWürttembergs. Deshalb wurden für die Ex kursion 2006 wiederum wenig besam melte Gebiete ausgewählt, diesmal in der nörd lichen Oberrheinebene im Bereich der Planquadrate L 6716 Speyer und L 6718 Heidelberg. Dabei wurde versucht, der großen Biotopvielfalt in diesem Bereich durch die Selektion von offenen Sandgebieten, trockenen Kiefernwäldern sowie einer Weichhol z aue mit ausgedehnten Was serfl ächen, Ufern und Wiesen gerecht zu werden. Diese Flächen liegen am Nordrand des von RHEINHEIMER (2000) erfassten Areals. Die Untersuchungsgebiete Weichholzaue bei Brühl Das NSG „Schwetzinger WiesenRiedwiesen“ (MTB 6617NW) umfasst 297 ha und wurde zwischen der Kollerfähre und der Leim bach mündung 2–3 km westlich von Brühl untersucht. Es liegt unmittelbar am Rhein und ist regelmäßigen Überfl utungen ausge setzt, da es sich vor der Abdeichung befi ndet. Etliche Altwässer durchziehen das Areal. Einige haben schlammige, andere sandige Ufer, so dass die Vegetation und Käferfauna sehr vielgestaltig ist. Mitt. ent. V. Stuttgart, Jg. 45, 2010 © Entomologischer Verein Stuttgart e.V.;download www.zobodat.at 92 Poophagus sisymbrii, der Gewöhnliche Sumpfkresserüssler (Foto: J.
    [Show full text]
  • (Donacia Crassipes Fabricius, 1775), Aquarell Von Alexander Von Peez
    © Tiroler Landesmuseum Ferdinandeum, Innsbruck download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Seerosen-Schilfkäfer (Donacia crassipes Fabricius, 1775), Aquarell von Alexander von Peez. © Tiroler Landesmuseum Ferdinandeum, Innsbruck download unter www.biologiezentrum.at FünFter Beitrag zur KäFerFauna nordtirols ergänzung zu den bisher erschienenen faunistischen arbeiten über die Käfer nordtirols (1950, 1971, 1976 und 1987) Manfred Kahlen AbstrAct Eine Vollständigkeit kann in der Dynamik der biologischen Forschung ohnehin nie erreicht werden. Es werden pri- A preliminary supplement to the previous faunistic publica- mär solche Ergänzungen dargestellt, welche aus eigenen tions on the beetles of Nordtirol (1950, 1971, 1976, 1987) is Aufsammlungen und aus Beiträgen von Kolleginnen und provided. In all, 270 additional taxa are listed and 75 previ- Kollegen in der Datenbank „biooffice“ der Naturwissen- ously recorded taxa are deleted. Thus, at present, 4340 taxa schaftlichen Sammlungen erfasst sind. Dazu kommen einige are currently known from the region. Recent nomenclatural Sammellisten von verlässlichen Kollegen des Auslandes und changes are accounted for in the species list. Angaben aus ad hoc bekannter Literatur. Daten aus (reichlich vorhandenen) Projektarbeiten, naturkundlichen Gutachten, Key words: Coleoptera, faunistic records, North Tyrol, Austria Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen etc. wurden nicht erhoben, insbesondere aus Gründen des Zeitlimits, welches solche Recherchen einschließlich Plausibilitätsprüfung der Angaben EinlEitung nicht zuließ.
    [Show full text]
  • Short Reports
    © Entomologica Fennica. 29.111.1993 Short reports The following reports have been presented during the last year at the meetings of the Entomological Society of Finland (ESF), the Societas Entomologica Helsingforsiensis (SEH), the Lepidopterological Society of Finland (LSF) and the Entomological Club of the Zoological and Botanical Society of Turku (ECT). For biogeographical provinces, Finnish grid coordinates, and UTM squares see inside back cover of annual issues 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Anchomenus dorsalis (Pontoppidan) thought to be Attagenus fasciatus (Thunberg), but (Coleoptera, Carabidae) found in Aland in 1979 Halstead and Green (Notulae Entomol. 59:97-104) described it as a new species by the Hans Silfverberg name of A. woodroffei. A. fasciatus has not been Zoologiska museet, PB 17 (N. Jiirnviigsg. 13), recorded from the Nordic countries. SF-00014 Helsingfors universitet, Finland In February 1992 I received for determina­ tion from Mr. J. Haimi (University of Jyvaskyla) During a visit to Aland, I found one specimen of Anchomenus dorsalis in Eckeri:i Degersand a specimen of Attagenus which appeared to be (669:08) on 28.5.1992. The locality is a sandy the true A. fasciatus. The specimen had been beach in a shallow bay, and the beetle was run­ found alive in a flat in Jyvaskyla on 30.1.1992 ning in the vegetation next to the sandy area. (M. Boucelham leg.). Some days later another Despite a close examination, no further specimens specimen had been found in the same flat. Dr. D. were found. G. H. Halstead (London) kindly confirmed my A. dorsalis has been collected numerous times determination.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Ground Beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) Along an Urban–Suburban–Rural Gradient of Central Slovakia
    diversity Article Change of Ellipsoid Biovolume (EV) of Ground Beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) along an Urban–Suburban–Rural Gradient of Central Slovakia Vladimír Langraf 1,* , Stanislav David 2, Ramona Babosová 1 , Kornélia Petroviˇcová 3 and Janka Schlarmannová 1,* 1 Department of Zoology and Anthropology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku 1, 94901 Nitra, Slovakia; [email protected] 2 Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku 1, 94901 Nitra, Slovakia; [email protected] 3 Department of Environment and Zoology, Faculty of Agrobiology and Food Resources Slovak, University of Agriculture in Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 94901 Nitra, Slovakia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (V.L.); [email protected] (J.S.) Received: 29 November 2020; Accepted: 11 December 2020; Published: 14 December 2020 Abstract: Changes in the structure of ground beetle communities indicate environmental stability or instability influenced by, e.g., urbanization, agriculture, and forestry. It can affect flight capability and ellipsoid biovolume (EV) of ground beetles. Therefore, we analyzed ground beetles in various habitats. In the course of the period from 2015 to 2017, we recorded in pitfall traps 2379 individuals (1030 males and 1349 females) belonging to 52 species at six localities (two rural, two suburban, two urban). We observed the decrease in the average EV value and morphometric characters (length, height, and width of the body) of ground beetles in the direction of the rural–suburban–urban gradient. Our results also suggest a decrease in EV of apterous and brachypterous species and an increase in macropterous species in the urban and suburban landscapes near agricultural fields.
    [Show full text]