DOCSLIB.ORG

An Artificial Beach As a Means for Sea Coast Protection from Storm Surges (By the Example of the Eastern Gulf of Finland)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Artificial Beach As a Means for Sea Coast Protection from Storm Surges (By the Example of the Eastern Gulf of Finland) AN ARTIFICIAL BEACH AS A MEANS FOR SEA COAST PROTECTION FROM STORM SURGES (BY THE EXAMPLE OF THE EASTERN GULF OF FINLAND) Leontyev, I.O., P.P. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology RAS, Moscow, Russia Akivis, T.M. P.P. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology RAS, Moscow, Russia [email protected] A model of an artificial beach is suggested for protection of coasts under erosion due to intense storm surges. It is shown that the coarser beach sand results in decrease of the beach width and growth of nourishment volume. At the same time relative material loss due to long-shore sediment transport diminishes too. The model has been applied to three sections of the coasts of Kurortny district of S.-Petersburg (eastern part of the Gulf of Finland). It recommends medium sand for the beaches construction. Modeling of extreme storms effect shows only minor deformations for designed beach profiles. For the beaches more than 1 km long even in 30-50 years more than a half of the initial beach volume conserves without additional nourishment. Key words: sand coast, artificial beach, beach profile, sediment flux, Gulf of Finland. I. INTRODUCTION Artificial beaches are widely applicable in the coastal protection practice for minimizing storm effect [1], [2]. Actual Russian recommendations for calculation of beach profiles [3] are related to coasts with no sea level changes. But there are a lot of coasts with dynamics governed by high storm surges. One of the examples is the coast of Kurortny district of S.-Petersburg in the eastern part of the Gulf of Finland (Fig. 1) which undergoes significant erosion [4], [5]. 30oE Tchernaya KUR River ORT NY Zelenogorsk DIST RICT Komarovo Repino cape Peschany A E Solnechnoe S IC T L A Sestroretsk B cape Dubovskoy GULF OF FINLAND K N cape Lisy Nos o o N t lin 0 o i 6 0 sl. 6 NEVA BAY 5 km Lomonosov St. Petersburg 30oE Fig. 1. The coast of the eastern Gulf of Finland and location of designed profiles Komarovo, Repino and Solnechnoe. The actual situation could be improved by construction of artificial sand beaches at vulnerable segments of the coast. But, for the surges higher than wave height, prediction of stable beach parameters is hardly possible on a base of traditional methods. In this paper a model of a stable beach is suggested and applied to three segments of the Kurortny district coast (Fig. 1). Effectiveness of the modeled beaches verified by means of mathematical modeling of the extreme storm action on the coast. II. A MODEL OF A STABLE BEACH Profile geometry. A scheme of profiles of natural and designed beaches is given in Fig. 2. An elevation z is measured from the lower still water level and horizontal distance x is counted off seaward from the highest beach point which is the sum of the storm surge η and wave run-up R heights. A horizontal segment la corresponds to the berm width. Its variations allow displacement of the whole designed profile seaward or landward in order to achieve its intersection with the natural profile in the closure depth h∗ . The latter bounds the area of significant sea bed deformations. profile z la lR l * R x x x x R c o storm surge level * lc η h 0 xo still water level * x h' X * natural profile designed profile plan x designed coastline Y y X natural coastline Fig. 2. A scheme of an artificial beach. The notations are in the text. The distance lR is a width of a wave run-up zone dependent of its height R and beach slope β R : lR = R / β R . (1) A segment l∗ corresponding to underwater part of designed profile under storm surge conditions is defined by Dean’s equilibrium profile [1], [6], [7]: 2 / 3 2 1/ 3 h = Ax , A = 2.25(wg / g) , (2) where h – is water depth relative to the storm surge level, wg – grain settling velocity in water, g – acceleration due to gravity. Parameter A is of order of 10-1 m1/3 and increases as the grain size 3/ 2 grows. So a length of the segment l∗ is l∗ = (h∗ / A) . Total width of the artificial beach above the still water level is lbeach = lR + lc , where 3/ 2 lc = (η / A) is a distance between the coastline positions for storm and still conditions (points xc and x0 in Fig. 2). A difference between coastline positions of designed and natural profiles, X = x0 − x0′ , defines the advance of the coastline within the artificial beach. The elevations of the designed profile are expressed by the following relationships: z = η + R , 0 ≤ x ≤ xR , z = η + R − (x − xR )β R , xR ≤ x ≤ xc , (3) 2/ 3 z = η − A(x − x0 ) , xc ≤ x ≤ x∗ . Location of the points xR , xc and x∗ is explained in Fig. 2. A volume of the material V per unit length of the coastline (m3 m-1) required for the beach construction can be found as x∗ V = ∫ (z − z′)dx , (4) 0 where z′ is an elevation of the natural profile relative to the still level. Design equations. The designed beach is rated for extremal storm with significant wave height in the open sea H s∞ , spectral peak period Tp and maximal storm surge level η . A height of wave run-up is estimated by known Hunt formula [8], [9] R = β R H s∞ L∞ , (5) 2 where L∞ = (g / 2π )Tp is deep water wavelength. It follows from Eqs. (5) and (1) that the run-up zone width depends only on the wave parameters: lR = H s∞ L∞ . An equilibrium bed slope in the run-up zone β R is calculated on a base of a Sunamura formula [10], used in [3] too: 0.5 Tp gd g β = 0.12 . (6) R H sB Here d g is average sand grain size, H sB is significant wave height at the wave breaking depth hB . The latter is interpreted as the depth of breaking of waves of 1% cumulative exceedance in the wave ensemble. If the direction of wave propagation is perpendicular to the coastline we have [11] 2/ 5 1 1/ 5 = 4/ 5 2 hB 2 H1%∞ (gTp ) , (7) 4πγ B where γ B = H1%B / hB = 0.8 is the breaker index. In a case of Rayleigh wave heights distribution, H1%∞ = 1.52H s∞ and H1%B = 1.52H sB , whence H sB = 0.53hB . And, at last, the depth of wave breaking and the closure depth are assumed equivalent: h∗ = hB . (8) III. ARTIFICIAL BEACHES FOR THE KURORTNY DISTRICT OF ST.PETERSBURG Basic assumptions. The model has been applied for design of artificial beaches capable of coasts protection in Kurortny district of Sankt-Petersburg within Komarovo, Repino and Solnechnoe segments (Fig. 1), where sand beaches are relatively narrow and dunes are low. 4 Komarovo 3 Bed deposits m 1 , 2 n 2 o i t 1 a v e l E 0 -1 -2 0 50 100 150 200 250 4 Repino 3 m storm surge level , 2 n o i η+ R t 1 a v h e * l E 0 -1 -2 0 50 100 150 200 250 4 Solnechnoe 3 Bed profiles 1 m , 2 n 2 o i t 1 a 3 v e l 4 E 0 5 -1 -2 0 50 100 150 200 250 Distance, m Fig. 3. Initial sea bed profiles, bed sediment characteristics and designed beach profiles for three coastal segments of Kurortny district. Bed sediment: 1 – sand, 2 – cobble. Sea bed profiles: 1 – initial, 2, 3, 4 and 5 – artificial profiles constructed from the sand of grain size 0.3, 0.5, 0.7 and 1.0 mm respectively. Typical sea bed profiles and bed sediment properties are represented in Fig. 3. They are based on monitoring data of the coastal zone collected for a number of years by A.P.Karpinsky Russian Geological Research Institute (VSEGEI) in Saint-Petersburg [12]. The storms accompanied by the surge of about 2 m height inflict the most valuable damage for the coasts. This kind of storms occurred approximately once every 25 years [13] but in the last decades their frequency at least doubled [5]. Parameters of the extreme event peak are the following [4]: H s∞ =1.6 m, Tp =5.4 s, η =2.0 m. The closure depth according to (7) and (8) is h∗ =2.7 m, so the depth of the profile base relative to the still level is h∗′ = h∗ −η =0.7 m (Fig. 2). Results of calculations. The artificial beaches were designed on a base of parameters given above for four different sand grain sizes: 0.3, 0.5, 0.7 and 1.0 mm. The profiles obtained are shown in Fig. 3 and their parameters are given in Table 1. It can bee seen that the maximal profile elevation is η+R is equal 2.5–2.6 m. Table 1. The designed parameters of artificial beach profiles for different sand grain size d g , η + R , lbeach , Komarovo Repino Solnechnoe mm m m X , la , V, X , la , V, X , la , V, 3 3 3 m m m /m m m m /m m m m /m 0.3 2.46 82 93 31 210 85 42 175 40 0 31 0.5 2.53 49 110 83 322 101 95 289 56 52 131 0.7 2.57 38 119 100 364 108 113 332 63 70 171 1.0 2.62 31 125 113 398 112 125 363 68 83 202 The beach width lbeach reduces for the coarser sand: from 82 to 31 m for d g growth from 0.3 to 1 mm.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 49 Since 1961 BALTICA Volume 31 Number 1 June 2018: 49–62
    since 1961 BALTICA Volume 31 Number 1 June 2018: 49–62 https://doi.org/10.5200/baltica.2018.31.05 Coastal dynamics of the eastern Gulf of Finland, the Baltic Sea: toward a quantitative assessment Alexander Sergeev, Daria Ryabchuk, Vladimir Zhamoida, Igor Leont’yev, Alexander Kolesov, Olga Kovaleva, Kaarel Orviku Sergeev, A., Ryabchuk, D., Zhamoida, V., Leont’yev, I., Kolesov, A., Kovaleva, O., Orviku, K., 2018. Coastal dynam- ics of the eastern Gulf of Finland, the Baltic Sea: toward a quantitative assessment. Baltica, 31 (1), 49–62. Vilnius. ISSN 0067-3064. Manuscript submitted 28 March 2018 / Accepted 21 May 2018 / Published online 28 June 2018 © Baltica 2018 Abstract The easternmost part of the Gulf of Finland is characterized by intense coastal processes dominated by wave erosion. Reliable prediction of the coastal zone development, as well as effective strategy for coastal protection, demands a quantitative assessment of beach transformation and volume of sediment loss as a result of extreme storms. The main goal of this study based on results of terrestrial laser scanning was to establish volumes of eroded, transported, and redeposited sand during storm surge events that occurred between 2012 and 2017, and to verify a mathematical model of beach profile changes within key areas located in the Ku- rortny District of St. Petersburg (Gulf of Finland, Baltic Sea), where the longest set of levelling and terrestrial laser scanning was conducted. The resulting detailed 3D GIS models of coastal relief, based on high-resolution geodesic surveys, produced a highly reliable database of beachface transformation under the extreme storm impact and quantitative assessment of erosion volumes and sediment loss.
    [Show full text]
  • List of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for St
    List of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for St. Petersburg and the Leningrad Region № Units Addresses п\п 1 Admiralteysky District of Saint 190013, Saint Petersburg Vereyskaya Street, 39 Petersburg 2 Vasileostrovsky District of Saint 199106, Saint Petersburg, Vasilyevsky Island, 19th Line, 12a Petersburg 3 Vyborgsky District of Saint 194156, Saint Petersburg, Prospekt Parkhomenko, 18 Petersburg 4 Kalininsky District of Saint 195297, Saint Petersburg, Bryantseva Street, 15 Petersburg 5 Kirovsky District of Saint 198152, Saint Petersburg, Avtovskaya Street, 22 Petersburg 6 Kolpinsky District of Saint 198152, Saint Petersburg, Kolpino, Pavlovskaya Street, 1 Petersburg 7 Krasnogvardeisky District of 195027, Saint Petersburg, Bolsheokhtinsky Prospekt, 11/1 Saint Petersburg 8 Krasnoselsky District of Saint 198329, Saint Petersburg, Tambasova Street, 4 Petersburg 9 Kurortny District of Saint 197706, Saint Petersburg, Sestroretsk, Primorskoe Highway, Petersburg 280 10 Kronshtadtsky District of Saint 197760, Saint Petersburg, Kronstadt, Lenina Prospekt, 20 Petersburg 11 Moskovsky District of Saint 196135, Saint Petersburg, Tipanova Street, 3 Petersburg 12 Nevsky District of Saint 192171, Saint Petersburg, Sedova Street, 86 Petersburg 13 Petrogradsky District of Saint 197022, Saint Petersburg, Grota Street, 1/3 Petersburg 14 Petrodvortsovy District of Saint 198516, Saint Petersburg, Peterhof, Petersburg Konnogrenaderskaya Street., 1 15 Primorsky District of Saint 197374 Saint Petersburg, Yakhtennaya Street, 7/2
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Efficiency Investment Projects in Using of Gas And
    EnergyEnergyEnergy efficiencyefficiencyefficiency investmentinvestmentinvestment projectsprojectsprojects ininin usingusingusing ofofof gasgasgas andandand biofuelbiofuelbiofuel ininin regionsregionsregions ofofof RussianRussianRussian FederationFederationFederation::: experienceexperienceexperience,,, intellectualintellectualintellectual managementmanagementmanagement andandand perspectivesperspectivesperspectives It is planed to gazified all settlements in Saint-Petersburg to 2010. Total sum of investments – about $200 mln. Investments for a gasification in 2007 – about $58 mln. Social project In 2005 on the base of Regional Program of depreciated equipment replacing «PeterburgsGaz» replace 13,348 gas-stoves and 2,271 waterheaters Intelligent management system for tourist-recreation territory of Kurortny District management Tourist-recreation territory for megapolis Kurortny District Saint-Petersburg Kurortny District is a suburban area of St. Petersburg. Main towns and villages: Sestroretsk, Zelenogorsk, Gornaya, Aleksandrovskaya, Razliv, Beloostrov, Pesochny, Solnechnoe, Repino, Komarovo, Ushkovo, Serovo, Molodezhnoe, Smolyachkovo. Kurortny District located in the north-west of St. Petersburg along the Gulf of Finland as a strip width 6-8 km and 45 km in length. Area is about 28.2 thousand ha. Permanent population of Kurortny Distirict is about of 70.4 thousand people, but it increase by 2-2.5 times every summer. Tourist-recreation territory for megapolis In June 1, 2006, "Peterburgteploenergo" launched a full reconstruction of the
    [Show full text]
  • Doing Business in St. Petersburg St
    Doing business in St. Petersburg St. Petersburg Foundation for SME Development – member of Enterprise Europe Network | www.doingbusiness.ru 1 Doing business in St. Petersburg Guide for exporters, investors and start-ups The current publication was developed by and under supervision of Enterprise Europe Network - Russia, Gate2Rubin Consortium, Regional Center - St. Petersburg operated by St. Petersburg Foundation for SME Development with the assistance of the relevant legal, human resources, certification, research and real estate firms. © 2014 Enterprise Europe Network - Russia, Gate2Rubin Consortium, Regional Center – St. Petersburg operated by St. Petersburg Foundation for SME Development. All rights reserved. International copyright. Any use of materials of this publication is possible only after written agreement of St. Petersburg Foundation for SME Development and relevant contributing firms. Doing business in St. Petersburg. – Spb.: Politekhnika-servis, 2014. – 167 p. ISBN 978-5-906555-22-9 Online version available at www.doingbusiness.ru. Doing business in St. Petersburg 2 St. Petersburg Foundation for SME Development – member of Enterprise Europe Network | www.doingbusiness.ru Table of contents 1. The city ....................................................................................................................... 6 1.1. Geography ............................................................................................................................. 6 1.2. Public holidays and business hours ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • B. M. Matveev a Tour Through Sestroretsk
    B. M. Matveev A Tour Through Sestroretsk. Sestroretsk. A bird’s-eye view. - http://sestroretsk.info/news/3024- fotorelaks-sestroreck- podpischiki-ssestroreck-s-vysoty-2000m To see all or almost all showplaces in Sestroretsk in one day, one needs to come to this St. Petersburg’s suburb early in the morning on a suburban electric train from St. Petersburg-Finlyandsky railway station. Of course, you can drive in your own car. A car will allow considerably reducing the trip time, but will deprive you of the joy of an hours-long walk in the fresh air. Besides, a lot worth your attention will surely fly by. Many interesting details will be left unseen, with no time to think them through. In both cases, the most important thing is nice weather. We recommend you to start your introductory tour by getting off at Razliv station. A little right of the platform starts 2nd Poperechnaya Street which runs into 4th Tarkhovskaya Street. After reaching it, you need to turn left and then right to Yemelyanova Street. 1 Here lies the famous Saray Museum where soviet tourists used to be brought by buses from every corner of the Soviet Union back in the day. Nowadays, the museum is visited in an orderly manner by the local children during the school studies period. Which is a pity, since there is much interesting to see and learn at the Saray and nearby. The Saray Museum. A photo dated 05.03.2017. 2 A sculpture of V. I. Lenin at the Saray Museum A photo dated 05.03.2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Methodology of the Coastal Erosion
    SOUTH-EAST FINLAND – RUSSIA ENPI CBC 2007 – 2013 Climate Proof Living Environment (CliPLivE) THE COASTAL EROSION MAP FOR DIFFERENT CLIMATE CHANGE SCENARIOS. COMPILATION - METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS Daria Ryabchuk, Vladimir Zhamoida, Alexander Sergeev, Olga Kovaleva, Elena Nesterova, Leonid Budanov St. Petersburg 2014 This Programme is co-funded by the European Union, the Russian Federation and the Republic of Finland SOUTH-EAST FINLAND – RUSSIA ENPI CBC 2007 – 2013 Climate Proof Living Environment (CliPLivE) State Geological Unitary Company «Mineral» Committee for Nature Use, Environmental Protection and Ecological Safety of St. Petersburg City Administration A.P. Karpinsky Russian Geological Research Institute THE COASTAL EROSION MAP FOR DIFFERENT CLIMATE CHANGE SCENARIOS. COMPILATION - METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS Daria Ryabchuk, Vladimir Zhamoida, Alexander Sergeev, Olga Kovaleva, Elena Nesterova, Leonid Budanov Contacts: Daria Ryabchuk VSEGEI Phone +7 (812) 328 90 01 Fax + 7 (812) 328 91 59 E-mail [email protected] This Programme is co-funded by the European Union, the Russian Federation and the Republic of Finland SOUTH-EAST FINLAND - RUSSIA ENPI CBC 2007 – 2013 Climate Proof Living Environment (CliPLivE) Contents 1. Method of coastal development study, analyses and prognosis ............................................................................... 5 1.1. Current coastal processes assessment - materials and methods ....................................................................... 5 Methods of coastal zone study and monitoring
    [Show full text]
  • Passport of St. Petersburg
    Passport of St. Petersburg Saint Petersburg (St. Petersburg) is situated at the easternmost tip of the Gulf of Finland of the Baltic Sea. The exact geographical coordinates of the city centre are 59°57' North Latitude 30°19' East Longitude. St. Petersburg, located in the node of several major sea, river and land transportation routes, is the European gate of Russia and its strategic centre closest to the border with the European Union. Inland waters constitute about 10% of the city territory. The total area (with administrative subjects) covers 1439 km². The population amounts to 5 225.7 people (as of January 1, 2016 by the data from the federal statistical agency “Petrostat”). St. Petersburg is the second (after Moscow) largest city of the Russian Federation and the third (after Moscow and London) largest city in Europe. St. Petersburg is the administrative centre of the Northwestern Federal Region which is characterized by considerable potential in natural resources, well developed industry, a fine traffic network and furthermore provides contact of the Russian Federation with the outside world via the sea ports of the Baltic Sea and the Arctic Ocean. The city hosts the following institutions: • The Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation; • Regional offices of federal ministries and departments; • Representations of 24 entities and 2 cities in the Russian Federation; • 65 consular offices of foreign countries; • Offices of international organizations: CIS Inter-Parliamentary Assembly, Inter-Parliamentary Assembly of the Eurasian Economic Community, representatives of international organizations, funds and associations, UN agencies and representative offices and branches of international banks. • Offices of international cultural institutions: the Goethe German Cultural Center, the French Institute, the Finnish Institute, the Dutch Institute, the Danish Cultural Institute, the Israeli Cultural Center and the Italian Cultural Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Geography and Regional Sociology
    SOCIAL GEOGRAPHY AND REGIONAL SOCIOLOGY SOCIO-SPATIAL DIFFERENTIATION IN TRANSITION: A PRELIMINARY COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-SOVIET SAINT PETERSBURG AND RIGA D. V. Zhitin a Z. Krisjane b G. Sechi b M. Berzins b a Saint Petersburg State University Received 18 September 2019 7—9 Universitetskaya emb., Saint Petersburg, Russia, 199034 doi: 10.5922/2079-8555-2020-1-6 b University of Latvia © Zhitin D. V., Sechi G., Krisjane Z., 19 Raina boulevard, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050 Berzins M. , 2020 Research into the socio-spatial dynamics in Central-Eastern European cities is an im- portant area of contemporary transition studies. Open issues in this domain range from defining a theoretical framework to data availability and methodological approaches. As to the former aspect, recent literature focuses on the hybrid nature of the post-socialist urban space, which underwent transformation in the conditions of globalization and eco- nomic liberalization; the earlier model of spatial development changed dramatically as a result. The multi-scalar and comparative approaches may shed new light on the complex patterns of urban socio-spatial differentiation and its post-Soviet dynamics. Growing regional socio-economic imbalances observed in the former socialist states are lending new urgency to this area of research. This study employs a comparative approach to investigate post-1991 socio-spatial trans- formations in St Petersburg and Riga — the two largest post-Soviet urban centres in the Baltic Sea region. An important result of the research is a methodology for multi-leva- el analysis of changes in the urban environment of post-socialist cities. Data from post-1991 national censuses and population registers are used to calculate measures of social well-being in urban districts as well as to identify territorial imbalances.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lichens of the Northern Shore of the Gulf of Finland in the Limits of St. Petersburg, Russia – Diversity on the Edge of the Megapolis
    Folia Cryptog. Estonica, Fasc. 57: 101–132 (2020) https://doi.org/10.12697/fce.2020.57.11 The lichens of the northern shore of the Gulf of Finland in the limits of St. Petersburg, Russia – diversity on the edge of the megapolis Irina S. Stepanchikova1,2, Dmitry E. Himelbrant1,2, Ekaterina S. Kuznetsova1,2, Jurga Motiejūnaitė3, Sergey V. Chesnokov2, Liudmila A. Konoreva2,4, Ludmila V. Gagarina2 1St. Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya emb. 7–9, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia. E-mails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 2Laboratory of Lichenology and Bryology, Komarov Botanical Institute RAS, Professor Popov St. 2, 197376 St. Petersburg, Russia. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3Laboratory of Mycology, Institute of Botany, Nature Research Centre, Žaliųjų Ežerų 49, LT–08406 Vilnius, Lithuania. E-mail: [email protected] 4Polar-alpine Botanical Garden-Institute, 184250 Murmansk Region, Kirovsk. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: We present a lichen checklist for the northern shore of the Gulf of Finland in the limits of St. Petersburg, Russia. This area has diverse lichen biota within the city limits, and has been comprehensively studied since 1893, which gives a good base for analysis of historical changes in lichen diversity. The documented lichen biota comprises 469 species (430 lichenized, 24 lichenicolous, 3 facultatively lichenicolous, and 12 non-lichenized saprobic fungi), of them 191 species are known from herbaria and literature for the period before 1991, and 436 species were recorded since 1991 to 2019. Thirty-three taxa were excluded from the lichen list of the study area as erroneous or dubious records.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of Onshore Laser Scanning Data for Mathematic Modeling of Coastal Profile Changes
    APPLICATION OF ONSHORE LASER SCANNING DATA FOR MATHEMATIC MODELING OF COASTAL PROFILE CHANGES Alexander Sergeev, A.P.Karpinsky Russian Geological Research Institute (VSEGEI), Russia Daria Ryabchuk, A.P.Karpinsky Russian Geological Research Institute (VSEGEI), Russia Vladimir Zhamoida, A.P.Karpinsky Russian Geological Research Institute (VSEGEI, Russia) Igor Leont’ev, P.P.Shirshov Institute of Oceanology RAS (IO RAS), Russia [email protected]. The easternmost part of the Gulf of Finland is characterized by intense coastal processes where erosion dominates. Onshore laser scanning of a beach surface of three coastal zone segments of the Kurortny District, St. Petersburg was carried out during the process of realisation of the CliPLivE project and coastal monitoring investigated by VSEGEI and “Mineral” company. One of the goals of the CliPLivE project was a prediction of coastal evolution by 2100 year based on retrospective analysis of the last century remote sensing data. The average annual range of coastal transformation was used for the mathematic modelling of beach profile changes. The model takes into account changes of sea level and possible increase of storm events occurrence. The onshore laser scanning was carried out each summer since 2012. After series of storms in 2015 the repeated scanning was carried out in December. It gave an opportunity to calculate volume and area of redeposited sand during the last storm that shows that a part or almost all sand material from eroded foredune was deposited in a middle part of the beach. This material forms an onshore sand bar in front of a new formed erosion escarpment. The comparison of the beach relief elevation models of 2012 and 2015 shows that another part of sand (up to 30-40% of volume of all mobilized beach sand) was washed out from the beach to offshore.
    [Show full text]
  • Methodology of the Coastal Erosion Map (For Different Climate Change Scenar
    SOUTH-EAST FINLAND – RUSSIA ENPI CBC 2007 – 2013 Climate Proof Living Environment (CliPLivE) Geological and Environmental Risks in St. Petersburg. Practical Recommendations for Climate Change Adaptation Olga Tomilina, Julia Menshova, Galina Savenkova, Igor Bogatyrev, Daria Ryabchuk, Dmitry Frank-Kamenetsky, Artem Pavlovsky St. Petersburg 2014 This Programme is co-funded by the European Union, the Russian Federation and the Republic of Finland SOUTH-EAST FINLAND – RUSSIA ENPI CBC 2007 – 2013 Climate Proof Living Environment (CliPLivE) State Geological Unitary Company «Mineral» Committee for Nature Use, Environmental Protection and Ecological Safety of St.Petersburg City Administration A.P. Karpinsky Russian Geological Research Institute Geological and Environmental Risks in St. Petersburg. Practical Recommendations for Climate Change Adaptation Olga Tomilina, Julia Menshova, Galina Savenkova, Igor Bogatyrev, Daria Ryabchuk, Dmitry Frank-Kamenetsky, Artem Pavlovsky St. Petersburg 2014 This Project is co-funded by the European Union, the Russian Federation and the Republic of Finland SOUTH-EAST FINLAND - RUSSIA ENPI CBC 2007 – 2013 Climate Proof Living Environment (CliPLivE) Contents Introduction................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1. Description of the study area .......................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • New Records of Lichens and Allied Fungi from the Leningrad Region, Russia
    Folia Cryptog. Estonica, Fasc. 47: 77–84 (2010) New records of lichens and allied fungi from the Leningrad Region, Russia Irina S. Stepanchikova1, 2, Martin Kukwa3, Ekaterina S. Kuznetsova1, 2, Jurga Motiejūnaitė4 & Dmitry E. Himelbrant1, 2 1Department of Botany, St. Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya emb. 7/9, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia. E-mails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 2Laboratory of Lichenology and Bryology, Komarov Botanical Institute, Professor Popov St. 2, 197376 St. Petersburg, Russia 3Department of Plant Taxonomy and Nature Protection, Gdansk University, Al. Legionów 9, PL-80-441 Gdansk, Poland. E-mail: [email protected] 4Laboratory of Mycology, Nature Research Center, Institute of Botany, Žaliųjų Ežerų 49, LT–08406 Vilnius, Lithuania. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Twelve species of lichenized and two lichenicolous fungi, and one non-lichenized calicioid fungus are reported from the Leningrad Region (Eastern, Western or Saint-Petersburg). Lecanora norvegica and Opegrapha lamyi are reported for the first time for Russia. Six taxa are also new to the whole Leningrad Region; four,Lecidella flavosorediata, Ochrolechia bahusiensis, Phaeocalicium praecedens and Tremella lichenicola – to North-Western European Russia, and one, the anamorphic lichen Dictyocatenulata alba is new to European Russia. Brief discussions on the species are included. Kokkuvõte: Samblike ja nendega seotud seente uued leiud Leningradi regioonist, Venemaalt Leningradi regiooni ida- ja lääneosast ning Sankt-Peterburgist teatatakse 12 lihheniseerunud, kahe lihhenikoolse ning ühe mittelihheniseerunud, kalitsioidse seene leidudest. Lecanora norvegica ja Opegrapha lamyi on esmasleiud Venemaal; anamo- rfne samblik Dictyocatenulata alba on esmasleid Venemaa Euroopa-osas; Lecidella flavosorediata, Ochrolechia bahusiensis, Phaeocalicium praecedens ja Tremella lichenicola on uued Venemaa Euroopa-osa loodepiirkonnale ning veel kuus liiki on uued Leningradi regioonile.
    [Show full text]