DOCSLIB.ORG

What Can the EU Expect from the New Belgian Government?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
What Can the EU Expect from the New Belgian Government? No. 64 OctoberNo. 20202 June 2011 What can the EU expect from the new Belgian government? 1 Benjamin Bodson applicable to all Member States – for example, the agreement’s confirmation that Belgium will 2 The political agreement that made the respect its obligations under EU law. new Belgian federal government possible mentions Europe nearly 130 times in an Does the agreement contain any surprises? Not intentional emphasis. The fact that new really. There will be no revolution in Belgian prime minister Alexander de Croo foreign policy. More precisely, we are witnessing presented his government’s programme in the European Parliament – the very a return to a more traditional Belgian politics that heart of the Brussels universe – was dented by the years when the country was co- constitutes an almost subliminal ruled by the New Flemish Alliance (N-VA), the message in line with the content of the euroscepticism of whom was increasingly agreement: his government desires to be evident. The composition of the new government resolutely pro-European. itself (socialists, liberals, greens and Flemish Christian democrats) aims for the centre and thus encourages this return of a traditional Belgian attitude towards the European project. The new government hopes ‘that Belgium, faithful to its The general message is clear from the first pages: history, will continue to build bridges and to Belgium will be – again, in some respects – a good actively seek a new European consensus.’ On student of European integration, a driving force more than one count, the text reflects the behind an ever closer Union. The government discourse of the State of the Union given by the thus explicitly insists on the ‘pro-European president of the European Commission, Ursula engagement’ of Belgium and ‘opts resolutely for von der Leyen, on 16 September 2000. The latter a firm, pro-European attitude.’ As the agreement certainly views the arrival of this government in a reminds us, ‘a small, open economy’ like Belgium positive light. This is fortunate, especially when can find its salvation only in the embrace of the one knows that the first drafts of the agreement EU. The message gets through, even, it’s true, if were apparently less ambitious. it sometimes means mentioning certain elements that were once commonplace but are no longer EGMONT Royal Institute for International Relations The analysis that follows endeavours to At the social level, the new government intends summarise the European dimension of the to support the Commission in the initiative aimed agreement. It is simply an overview. at guaranteeing a minimum wage in the EU – welcome support for the Commission when we WHAT DOES THE AGREEMENT SAY? know that the question does not fall within the EU’s domain of competences and that whatever As previously stated, the text of the discourse on progress can be made in this area cannot be the State of the Union was certainly on the reached without the voluntary collaboration of negotiating table. Between the preservation and Member States. The new government will the reinforcement of the Schengen rules, the furthermore continue to ‘actively’ support the creation of own resources, respect for the rule of development of the permanent European law (and conditionality in the granting of Unemployment Benefit Scheme currently under European funds), support for Commission discussion, as well as ‘the initiatives concerning initiatives to deal with the pandemic and its the European guarantee for infants and the consequences and so on, the numerous elements revised European Youth Guarantee.’ The of the agreement have plenty to delight the government will not fail, furthermore, to invest occupants of Berlaymont. ‘actively in the development of the new European As far as the EU internal market is concerned, in Labour Authority and will support the the broad sense, the government will engage in establishment of a “social Europol” charged with deepening it. It poses European integration as a monitoring the posting of workers at European preliminary step necessary to the increase of level.’ ‘levers to control our strategic interests, our At the environmental level, the government values and the liberal and democratic norms intends to commit fully to the fulfilment of the beyond our frontiers.’ European Green Deal, notably to reach targets From a fiscal point of view, the new government for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by asks for ‘a form of taxation [...] on digital services’ 55% by the 2030 horizon and achieve climate and announces that it will take the initiative in the neutrality by 2050. The agreement thus here once discussions – already underway – at the EU level again echoes the recent speech on the State of the and at the OECD. If no agreement is found at Union. Let us also mention that the government either of these levels, Belgium will adopt its own intends to support the Commission in its strategy regimen in 2023. No longer a question of taking on plastics, notably in the ambition of the initiative but rather a ‘constructive role’ in the harmonising the rules on the material. concretisation of ‘projects of fiscal European The sixth and final focus of the agreement is harmony and cooperation between Member entitled: ‘Belgium: a strong voice in Europe and States.’ The agreement mentions the revision of the world.’ Thus, beyond the frontiers of the EU, VAT, the establishment of a common the agreement evokes Belgium’s attachment to (consolidated) base taxation for corporations, ‘robust multilateralism’ while underlining that and taxes on financial institutions ‘among others’. ‘European integration’ is the ‘most important The government positions itself, furthermore, ‘in lever’ to achieve this goal: ‘the EU [is] the best favour of revising the current tax exemption for instrument for defending Belgian interests at the kerosene’. It expresses, lastly, the hope of global level,’ to confront the ‘great challenges of ‘arriving at full monetary and fiscal union.’ our time’ and protect fundamental rights. The new government thus subscribes fully to the EU’s EGMONT Royal Institute for International Relations 2 ambitions for strategic autonomy, which will to the inclusion in these agreements of ‘high notably please the president of the European social and environmental standards’ (and human Council, Charles Michel. Following the same line rights), giving as examples the ‘fundamental of thought, the government then pleads with the norms of the International Labour Organization’, EU to ‘equip itself with a true capacity for compatibility with the Paris Agreement or ‘the scientific, industrial and military action that [allow application of OECD criteria for fiscal it] to be a significant diplomatic actor on the transparency’. The new government then warns, world stage’ and support the European Defence in a tone perhaps more threatening and taking Fund and PESCO. All this while reiterating its account of the ‘previous CETA’, that ‘Belgium attachment to NATO, which must, according to will not, therefore, accept new trade and the government, remain, ‘the cornerstone of the investment agreements except when these collective defence of Europe.’ Belgium will standards are applicable and binding.’ It seeks continue, furthermore, to plead in favour of the nevertheless to reassure by stressing that it ‘will transition from unanimity to a qualified majority be a trustworthy partner throughout the voting in the decision-making process of the ratification of trade agreements.’ As for treaties CFSP. already signed, they ‘will be presented for ratification in view of a debate in the [federal] On the question of asylum and immigration, the parliament on the basis of an impact analysis or government announces ‘a humane policy for the general interests of the Belgian economy and, people who require protection and a firm return in particular, the chapter on sustainable policy’. The government adds that ‘Belgium [will] development will be evaluated.’ It remains to be show humanity and solidarity in the case of seen what will underlie this impact analysis. situations of acute urgency overseas that require Finally, on the thorny subject of dispute the welcoming of vulnerable people.’ In other resolution that led Belgium to ask the European words, between a ‘common asylum policy for Court of Justice on the compatibility of the Europe’, an ‘equitable distribution of mechanism envisaged by CETA with EU law, the responsibilities and expenses’ at the European government confirms that Belgium will level and ‘reinforced external borders’, every contribute to the creation of a multilateral political hue will be satisfied. Defining the investment tribunal. As long as this tribunal does Belgian position in the framework of negotiations not exist, the government will ensure that future on the future European Pact on Asylum and agreements foresee ‘the creation of a tribunal for Migration will not, however, be easy – not to dispute resolution that offers substantial mention the pressure that will be exercised on guarantees concerning its independence and this government by a ferocious opposition at respect for the rule of law.’ national level on this subject. Finally, aware that Belgium is among those Given that one of the authors of the report is countries most affected in the event of an none other than Paul Magnette, who, in 2016, led absence of an agreement on the future the opposition to CETA, many observers will partnership between the EU and the UK – and have been attentive to the section
Load more

Recommended publications
  • How Big Is Belgium's Love Still for Europe? - the Low Countries 29/05/2020 21:18
    How Big Is Belgium's Love Still for Europe? - the low countries 29/05/2020 21:18 © Trui Chielens Zero Point 1945 SOCIETY HISTORY How Big Is Belgium's Love Still for Europe? By Ellen Vanderschueren, Jasper Praet, Hendrik Vos translated by Elisabeth Salverda 29/05/2020 ! 11 min reading time After the Second World War, Belgium was one of Europe’s founders. Over the years, Belgian politicians have played a prominent role in European politics. There was always a shared feeling among the population that integration with Europe was useful and in the national interest. In recent times, however, this consensus has been somewhat worn down. n 2009, the first President of the European Council to be appointed was a I Belgian, when Herman Van Rompuy became “President of Europe”. Five years later Donald Tusk, a former prime minister of Poland, took over the helm. And five years after that, in 2019, the role fell to a Belgian once more: Charles Michel fit the jigsaw of nominations and was asked by his colleagues to chair the European Council. Belgians have quite often had a steering role in European politics. Belgium was one of the founders of the European project, and has played a very active role over the years in its process of integration. https://www.the-low-countries.com/article/how-big-is-belgiums-love-still-for-europe Pagina 1 van 15 How Big Is Belgium's Love Still for Europe? - the low countries 29/05/2020 21:18 Herman Van Rompuy and Charles Michel, the first and current President of the European Council Much has changed over the past seventy years: the Community with a focus on coal and steel has grown into a European Union that plays a significant role in almost all economic and political spheres.
    [Show full text]
  • Dear President, Dear Ursula, We Welcome the Letter of 1 March That
    March 8, 2021 Dear President, dear Ursula, We welcome the letter of 1 March that you received from Chancellor Merkel and PM Frederiksen, PM Kallas and PM Marin. We share many of the ideas outlined in the letter. Indeed, there are some points that we find are of particular importance as we work to progress the digital agenda for the EU. We certainly agree that our agenda must be founded on a good mix of self-determination and openness. Our approach to digital sovereignty must be geared towards growing digital leadership by preparing for smart and selective action to ensure capacity where called for, while preserving open markets and strengthening global cooperation and the external trade dimension. Digital innovation benefits from partnerships among sectors, promoting public and private cooperation. Translating excellence in research and innovation into commercial successes is crucial to creating global leadership. The Single Market remains key to our prosperity and to the productivity and competitiveness of European companies, and our regulatory framework needs to be made fit for the digital age. We need a Digital Single Market for innovation, to eliminate barriers to cross-border online services, and to ensure free data flows. Attention must be paid to the external dimension where we should continue to work closely with our allies around the world and where in our interest, develop new partnerships. We need to make sure that the EU can be a leader of a responsible digital transformation. Trust and innovation are two sides of the same coin. Europe’s competitiveness should be built on efficient, trustworthy, transparent, safe and responsible use of data in accordance with our shared values.
    [Show full text]
  • Our European Future OUR EUROPEAN
    Our European Future European Our OUR EUROPEAN ChartingFUTURE a Progressive Course in the World Ideas contributed by László Andor, Vytenis Povilas Andriukaitis, François Balate, Peter Bofinger, Tanja A. Börzel, Mercedes Bresso, Stefan Collignon, Olivier Costa, Emma Dowling, Saïd El Khadraoui, Gerda Falkner, Georg Fischer, Diego Lopez Garrido, Hedwig Giusto, Giovanni Grevi, Ulrike Guérot, Paolo Guerrieri, Lukas Hochscheidt, Robin Huguenot-Noël, Guillaume Klossa, Halliki Kreinin, Michael A. Landesmann, Jean-François Lebrun, Jo Leinen, Lora Lyubenova, Justin Nogarede, Vassilis Ntousas, Alvaro Oleart, Carlota Perez, David Rinaldi, Barbara Roggeveen, Vivien A. Schmidt, Ania Skrzypek, Mario Telò and Britta Thomsen edited by Maria João Rodrigues OUR EUROPEAN FUTURE The Foundation for European Progressive Studies (FEPS) is the think tank of the progressive political family at EU level. Our mission is to develop innovative research, policy advice, training and debates to inspire and inform progressive politics and policies across Europe. We operate as hub for thinking to facilitate the emergence of progressive answers to the chal- lenges that Europe faces today. FEPS works in close partnership with its members and partners, forging connections and boosting coherence among stakeholders from the world of politics, academia and civil society at local, regional, national, European and global levels. Today FEPS benefits from a solid network of 68 member organisations. Among these, 43 are full members, 20 have observer status and 5 are ex-of- ficio members. In addition to this network of organisations that are active in the promotion of progressive values, FEPS also has an extensive network of partners, including renowned universities, scholars, policymakers and activists. Our ambition is to undertake intellectual reflection for the benefit of the progressive movement, and to promote the founding principles of the EU – freedom, equality, solidarity, democracy, respect of human rights, funda- mental freedoms and human dignity, and respect of the rule of law.
    [Show full text]
  • Séance Plénière
    CRABV 54 PLEN 027 CRABV 54 PLEN 027 BELGISCHE KAMER VAN CHAMBRE DES REPRÉSENTANTS VOLKSVERTEGENWOORDIGERS DE BELGIQUE BEKNOPT VERSLAG COMPTE RENDU ANALYTIQUE PLENUMVERGADERING SÉANCE PLÉNIÈRE Donderdag Jeudi 15-01-2015 15-01-2015 Namiddag Après-midi KAMER-2E ZITTING VAN DE 54E ZITTINGSPERIODE 2014 2015 CHAMBRE-2E SESSION DE LA 54E LÉGISLATURE N-VA Nieuw-Vlaamse Alliantie PS Parti Socialiste MR Mouvement réformateur CD&V Christen-Democratisch en Vlaams Open Vld Open Vlaamse Liberalen en Democraten sp.a socialistische partij anders Ecolo-Groen Ecologistes Confédérés pour l’organisation de luttes originales – Groen cdH centre démocrate Humaniste VB Vlaams Belang FDF Fédéralistes démocrates francophones PTB-GO! Parti du Travail de Belgique – Gauche d’Ouverture! PP Parti Populaire Afkortingen bij de nummering van de publicaties : Abréviations dans la numérotation des publications : DOC 54 0000/000 Parlementair stuk van de 54e zittingsperiode + basisnummer en DOC 54 0000/000 Document parlementaire de la 54e législature, suivi du n° de volgnummer base et du n° consécutif QRVA Schriftelijke Vragen en Antwoorden QRVA Questions et Réponses écrites CRIV Voorlopige versie van het Integraal Verslag (groene kaft) CRIV Version provisoire du Compte Rendu Intégral (couverture verte) CRABV Beknopt Verslag (witte kaft) CRABV Compte Rendu Analytique (couverture blanche) CRIV Integraal Verslag, met links het definitieve integraal verslag en CRIV Compte Rendu Intégral, avec, à gauche, le compte rendu rechts het vertaalde beknopt verslag van de toespraken (met
    [Show full text]
  • To: the Prime Minister of Belgium, Charles Michel [email protected] [email protected]
    To: The Prime Minister of Belgium, Charles Michel [email protected] [email protected] The Deputy Prime Minister of Belgium, Jan Jambon [email protected] The Deputy Prime Minister of Belgium, Alexander De Croo [email protected] The Deputy Prime Minister of Belgium, Didier Reynders [email protected] The Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Employment, Economy and Consumer Affairs, Kris Peeters [email protected] The Cabinet of Mobility [email protected] Cc: The European Commission Single European Sky, Maurizio Castelletti [email protected] Genève, April 15th, 2016 Your Excellency, Since the Belgian and International media continue to grossly misrepresent what is really happening within Belgocontrol, Skycontrol, Swiss Air Traffic Controllers Union, needs to clarify a number of things concerning the situation in the Belgian airspace. • Belgian Air Traffic Controllers DID NOT GO ON STRIKE. Neither the Belgian Guild of Air Traffic Controllers (BGATC), nor the Unions representing the Air Traffic Controllers have called for an action, strike or anything else. A circulating letter, which stated that BGATC called for actions, is purely false information and misleading the media and the general public. • Belgocontrol management appears to have deliberately chosen the moment to force a collective agreement for Belgocontrol staff. Given the sensitivity of these unilateral measures and the impact they would have on the individual Air Traffic Controllers at Belgocontrol, the detrimental impact this would have on their ability to provide a safe and efficient service was entirely predictable. • As such, we clearly place the full responsibility for the chaos of the past days with the management of Belgocontrol and the Belgian political system.
    [Show full text]
  • Trade Paradiplomacy and the Politics of International Economic Law: the Inclusion of Quebec and the Exclusion of Wallonia in the CETA Negotiations
    New Political Economy ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cnpe20 Trade Paradiplomacy and the Politics of International Economic Law: The Inclusion of Quebec and the Exclusion of Wallonia in the CETA Negotiations Stéphane Paquin To cite this article: Stéphane Paquin (2021): Trade Paradiplomacy and the Politics of International Economic Law: The Inclusion of Quebec and the Exclusion of Wallonia in the CETA Negotiations, New Political Economy, DOI: 10.1080/13563467.2021.1879761 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2021.1879761 Published online: 28 Jan 2021. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=cnpe20 NEW POLITICAL ECONOMY https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2021.1879761 Trade Paradiplomacy and the Politics of International Economic Law: The Inclusion of Quebec and the Exclusion of Wallonia in the CETA Negotiations Stéphane Paquin École nationale d’administration publique, Québec, Canada ABSTRACT KEYWORDS International trade negotiations are no longer largely limited to federal Trade paradiplomacy; government’s constitutional jurisdictions. In this context, substate international economic law; governments, like Quebec and Wallonia, are aware that their ability to inclusion and exclusion; formulate and implement policy, are subject to negotiations in trade Quebec; Wallonia; CETA negotiations talks. This article compares the role of Quebec and Wallonia in the CETA negotiations. While Wallonia was able to force the inclusion of an interpretative legal instrument to clarify certain parts of CETA, Quebec, like the other Canadian provinces, was able to influence the negotiation from within.
    [Show full text]
  • China at the Gates a New Power Audit of Eu-China Relations
    CHINA AT THE GATES A NEW POWER AUDIT OF EU-CHINA RELATIONS François Godement & Abigaël Vasselier ABOUT ECFR The European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) is the first pan-European think-tank. Launched in October 2007, its objective is to conduct research and promote informed debate across Europe on the development of coherent, effective and values- based European foreign policy. ECFR has developed a strategy with three distinctive elements that define its activities: • A pan-European Council. ECFR has brought together a distinguished Council of over two hundred Members - politicians, decision makers, thinkers and business people from the EU’s member states and candidate countries - which meets once a year as a full body. Through geographical and thematic task forces, members provide ECFR staff with advice and feedback on policy ideas and help with ECFR’s activities within their own countries. The Council is chaired by Carl Bildt, Emma Bonino and Mabel van Oranje. • A physical presence in the main EU member states. ECFR, uniquely among European think-tanks, has offices in Berlin, London, Madrid, Paris, Rome, Sofia and Warsaw. Our offices are platforms for research, debate, advocacy and communications. • Developing contagious ideas that get people talking. ECFR has brought together a team of distinguished researchers and practitioners from all over Europe to carry out innovative research and policy development projects with a pan-European focus. ECFR produces original research; publishes policy reports; hosts private meetings, public debates, and “friends of ECFR” gatherings in EU capitals; and reaches out to strategic media outlets. ECFR is a registered charity funded by the Open Society Foundations and other generous foundations, individuals and corporate entities.
    [Show full text]
  • European Union in the Time of Crisis
    PES 2016 Draft Programme 16-03-30 European Union in the Time of Crisis: Better Together? Annual Conference of the Prague European Summit 6 – 8 June 2016 Lobkowicz Palace, Prague Castle, Jiřská 3, Prague 1 Monday, 6 June Morning Arrivals 12:00 – 14:00 Registration and welcome refreshment (for speakers) 12:30 – 14:00 Working Lunch of the Programme Board 14:00 – 14:30 Registration and welcome coffee (for all participants) 14:30 – 16:00 Opening plenary session Words of welcome: Vladimír Bartovic, Director of EUROPEUM Institute for European Policy Radko Hokovský, Executive Director, European Values Think-Tank Petr Kratochvíl, Director of the Institute of International Relations Key-Note Address: Why Better Together? Lubomír Zaorálek, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Czech Republic Federica Mogherini, High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (tbc) Moderator: Antonio Missiroli, Director of European Union Institute for Security Studies (tbc) 16:00 – 16:30 Coffee break 16:30 – 18:00 Breakout Sessions: Challenges for Europe Breakout Sessions A: Future of the Schengen cooperation Opening speaker: Guy Verhofstadt, Chairman of The Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe, Member of the European Parliament (tbc) Discussant 1: Joachim Herrmann, Minister of Interior of Bavaria (tbc) Discussant 2: Claude Moraes, Chairman of Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, Member of the European Parliament (tbc) Moderator: Gideon Rachman, Chief Foreign Affairs Commentator, Financial Times (tbc) Breakout Sessions B: Fragmentation vs. enhanced cooperation 1 Opening speaker: Ana Palacio, former Minister for Foreign Affairs of Spain (tbc) Discussant 1: Agata Gostyńska-Jakubowska, Research Fellow at Centre for European Reform Discussant 2: Steven Blockmans, Senior Research Fellow and Head of EU Foreign Policy at Centre for European Policy Studies Moderator: Tom Nuttall, Charlemagne Columnist, The Economist, Brussels (tbc) Breakout Sessions C: Euroscepticism vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Merkel Pledges to Rebuild 'Devastated' Flood-Hit Areas
    World Monday, July 19, 2021 05 UNESCO pursues plan to classify Great Barrier Reef as ‘endangered’ DPA The director and the To prevent it from be- and its impact on World Her- World Heritage sites world- BEIJING president of the 44th session, ing red-listed, the Australian itage are an important topic wide. China’s Vice Minister of Edu- government had invited more at the meeting in Fuzhou. The Currently, 53 World Herit- DESPITE opposition in Aus- cation Tian Xuejun, dismissed than a dozen ambassadors on director of the World Herit- age sites are classified as en- tralia, the UNESCO World speculation that the move was a snorkelling trip to the reef age Committee stressed that dangered. Heritage Committee is push- related to political tensions ahead of the meeting. the idea of the List of Endan- For the first time in the ing ahead with plans to classify between China and Australia. Nine of the 15 diplomats gered Sites is “a call to action” history of the World Heritage the Great Barrier Reef, threat- were from countries that in which the entire world com- Convention, two sites could ened by climate change, as an The Great Barrier Reef off would have voting rights at munity should cooperate. lose their title at the session. endangered natural site, the the committee’s meeting, Ernesto Ottone, the UN The Liverpool waterfront, committee’s director Mechtild the east coast of Australia Australian news agency AAP agency’s department head in for example, is to be discussed Roessler said on Sunday. stretches over more than reported.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of EU Studies in France », in Federiga Bindi the STATE of EU STUDIES in FRANCE and Kjell A
    OLIVIER COSTA Olivier Costa, « The state of EU studies in France », in Federiga Bindi THE STATE OF EU STUDIES IN FRANCE and Kjell A. Eliassen (ed.), Analyzing European Union Politics, Rome, Il Mulino, 2012, p. 195‐218. France is one of the founding members of the European Communities. It has played an active role in the definition of the Manuscript completed in May 2011 Community method. French lawyers have soon devoted much attention to European integration, since some were closely involved in the drafting of the treaties. Economists have also taken this phenomenon seriously at an early stage. On the contrary, for a long time, French political scientists paid little attention to Europe. In the 1980s, European studies were less developed in France than in the French speaking parts of Belgium, Switzerland or even Canada. Since the end of the 1990s, things have evolved significantly: today many French political scientists are working on EU matters and a significant number of them are defining themselves as EU specialists. However, the involvement of French scholars in the international debates remains quite limited and the landscape of French EU studies keeps its originality. It may seem artificial to underline this French specificity since some of the most prominent EU researchers in France appear to be Austrian (Sabine Saurugger), Belgian (Renaud Dehousse), English (Andy Smith), German/Argentinean (Emiliano Grossman) or Finish (Niilo Kauppi). Also, many French scholars have made their academic education outside France, like Virginie Guiraudon (Harvard) or Nicolas Jabko (Berkeley), or are still holding positions outside France, in EUI Florence (Yves Mény, Pascal Vénesson), the LSE (Michael Bruter), Princeton (Sophie Meunier), Université libre de Bruxelles/ULB (François Forêt, Jean-Marc Ferry, Amandine Crespy) or Copenhagen Business School (Magali Gravier).
    [Show full text]
  • Managed Expectations: EU Member States' Views on the Conference On
    Working Paper SWP Working Papers are online publications within the purview of the respective Research Division. Unlike SWP Research Papers and SWP Comments they are not reviewed by the Institute. This Working Paper is part of a series of ‘European Perspectives’ – joint analysis and recommendations from SWP authors together with our European partners on current challenges for the European Union. RESEARCH DIVISION EU / EUROPE | WP NR. 03, JUNE 2021 Managed Expectations: EU Member States’ Views on the Conference on the Future of Europe Minna Ålander, Nicolai von Ondarza, Sophia Russack (eds) Abstract The EU institutions (European Commission, European Parliament and Council) have di- verging opinions on the aims and outcomes of the Conference on the Future of Europe. The Council has been the EU institution with the most reservations about the format and aim of the exercise. This scepticism, however, is the lowest common denominator of a more diverse set of priorities and expectations. This report reveals what individual member states want to achieve with the Conference and their expectations of the potential results. It brings together short contributions from a representative cross-section of EPIN members and distils the essential aspects. It inves- tigates the respective governments’ positions on institutional reform ideas, EU Treaty change, prioritised policy fields, plans for national citizen participation and media cover- age, as well as the general current political environment regarding further EU integration. The European Policy Institutes Network comprises 41 think tanks and policy institutes working on EU affairs from 28 Eu- ropean countries, including almost all EU member states as well as candidate countries.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Path to 'Strategic Autonomy'
    On the path to 'strategic autonomy' The EU in an evolving geopolitical environment STUDY EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service Authors: Suzana Anghel, Beatrix Immenkamp, Elena Lazarou, Jerôme Leon Saulnier, Alex Benjamin Wilson PE 652.096 – September 2020 On the path to 'strategic autonomy' The EU in an evolving geopolitical environment In confronting the EU with an unprecedented crisis, the coronavirus outbreak is testing the bloc's unity, but may also accelerate the construction of EU strategic autonomy, as the roadmap for recovery is implemented. Political will, still in the making, and the capacity to act are key prerequisites for achieving effective European strategic autonomy. The EU is increasingly at risk of becoming a 'playground' for global powers in a world dominated by geopolitics. Building European strategic autonomy on a horizontal – cross-policy – basis would strengthen the EU's multilateral action and reduce dependence on external actors, to make the EU less vulnerable to external threats; while promoting a level playing field that benefits everyone. The EU could thus reap the full dividend of its integration and possibly benefit from greater economic gains. To build European strategic autonomy, the EU may choose to use the still 'under-used' or 'unused' potential of the Lisbon Treaty, with the European Council having a key role to play in triggering some of the Treaty provisions, particularly in foreign and security policy. European strategic autonomy may also result from a deepening of the EU integration process. Nevertheless, it remains to be seen whether the Member States will wish to grasp the opportunity offered by the Conference on the Future of Europe to deepen the European project.
    [Show full text]