DOCSLIB.ORG

Youth-Led Participatory Action Research in Budi County, Eastern Equatoria State

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Youth-Led Participatory Action Research in Budi County, Eastern Equatoria State ttg Final Report Youth -Led Participatory Action Research Budi County, Eastern Equatoria State, South Sudan August 2015 Nadia Lehmann Budi Youth Action Research Team Youth-Led Research | Final Report 2 Copyright and disclaimer Copyright: United Nations Children‟s Fund UNICEF South Sudan, 2015 This is the fourth in a series of “Youth LEAD Knowledge Development”- the Youth LEAD initiative‟s knowledge development series. The “Youth LEAD Knowledge Development” series acknowledges the contributions made by young people in shaping their own development and showcases emerging perspectives and lessons learnt in youth programming through the Youth LEAD initiative. The opinions expressed in this documentation do not necessarily reflect the policies or views of UNICEF, nor collaborating partners. The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed herein originate from engagement with young people, stakeholders and partners involved in the Youth LEAD initiative. Any part of this documentation may be freely reproduced with the appropriate acknowledgement. Credits: Technical direction and coordination Jairus Ligoo; Youth & Adolescent Development Specialist Technical implementation and guidance at Search for Common Ground Kenneth Ganna-Conteh; Interim Country Director South Sudan Adrienne Lemon; Regional Design, Monitoring & Evaluation Coordinator Adalei Broers; Design, Monitoring & Evaluation Coordinator South Sudan Amzah Juma; Design, Monitoring & Evaluation Officer South Sudan Nadia Lehmann; External Consultant This report is has been compiled and produced with financial support from the Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development- Canada For further information contact: UNICEF South Sudan Toto Chan Compound, P. O. Box 45, Juba, South Sudan www.unicef.org/southsudan www.facebook.com/unicefsouthsudan Youth-Led Research | Final Report 3 Acknowledgement This report was made possible by the many young people and other stakeholders who participated and supported the Youth-Led Participatory Action Research in Budi County, Eastern Equatoria State. Thank you for sharing your thoughts, ideas and suggestions. About YOUTH LEAD initiative Leadership, Empowerment, Advocacy and Development Youth LEAD is an initiative supported by the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA), in partnership with UNICEF, government (Ministry of culture, Youth and Sports, Ministry of General Education and Instruction) and NGO partners. It recognizes and strengthens the capacity of both rights holders (children and youth) to make their claims and duty bearers (parents, communities, policy makers, government and civil society service providers) to meet their obligations; while strengthening communication between both parties and across multiple sectors. Of particular importance, the initiative engages young women and men as key actors in their own development. The same is true of key line ministries and civil society organizations (CSOs) providing services to youth. Engaging beneficiaries is intended to develop capacity, accountability, ownership, and sustainability. South Sudan has experienced more years of war than peace. But today, after a generation of war, South Sudan is facing a new moment of hope if the transitional peace opportunity is seized to promote long-term peace and development. The large youth population in South Sudan represents an opportunity for peace building, development, and leadership. However, young people growing up in South Sudan today face many inter-related risks and vulnerabilities. Addressing the key development and peace building priorities of South Sudan‟s youth is central to ensuring sustainable recovery and peace building. Youth LEAD is implemented in three states (Upper Nile, Jonglei and Eastern Equatoria), the Project has five main components, as outlined below. Component 1 – Youth Friendly Spaces and Services: Under this component, Youth Friendly Spaces/Centers (YFS) will be developed to offer demand-driven social services, and a place where youth feel they belong with services for both boys'/men's and girls'/women's different needs based on consultations with girls/women and boys/men. Component 2 – Basic Education, Skills Training and Livelihoods: Youth LEAD will provide basic education and skills training opportunities linked to livelihood and employment programming via the Alternative Learning Program (ALP). The ALP aims to provide learning opportunities for out of school youth by offering flexible schedules, accelerated learning, and community girls‟ schools. It focuses on the provision of youth literacy, numeracy, life-skills and vocational skills. Component 3 – Youth Voices in Peace and Governance: This component aims to provide opportunities for young voices to be heard in society and in the media. Youth will be engaged as Youth-Led Research | Final Report 4 leaders in the process of peace building, and dialogue and advocacy for peace, based on established platforms for communication and messaging. Component 4 – Capacity Building in Policy and Advocacy: This component aims to educate youth on how policy and dialogue can support peace, and to build capacity of partners to effectively develop and strengthen youth-centered polices, to link policy to programming, and to advocate for youth policies and programs that make a difference for youth and their communities. Component 5 – Institutional Capacity Building of Civil society Organisations and Ministries Supporting Youth. Based on further partner mapping and needs assessment, UNICEF will develop and implement capacity building trainings around core management, administrative, and programming functions. Youth-Led Research | Final Report 5 Table of Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................................ 6 List of Figures .......................................................................................................................... 6 Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................... 7 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. 8 Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 8 Limitations .......................................................................................................................... 9 Key Findings ...................................................................................................................... 9 Recommendations ............................................................................................................10 1. Background Information .....................................................................................................11 Context ................................................................................................................................11 National Level ...................................................................................................................11 Eastern Equatoria..............................................................................................................11 Budi County .......................................................................................................................12 Project Overview .................................................................................................................12 2. Methodology ........................................................................................................................13 Approach to Research ........................................................................................................13 Research Process .............................................................................................................14 The Research Team ............................................................................................................15 Research Questions ...........................................................................................................15 Target Population & Sampling ...........................................................................................16 Researchers’ Data Collection Activities & Tools ..............................................................18 Researchers’ Data Analysis ...............................................................................................19 Limitations ...........................................................................................................................19 3. Programmatic Challenges ..................................................................................................20 4. Findings ...............................................................................................................................22 Understanding and Meaning of Conflict ............................................................................22 Types of Conflict in Budi County ........................................................................................23 Drivers of Conflict in Budi County .....................................................................................23 Alcoholism .........................................................................................................................23 Poverty, Resources and Dowry .........................................................................................24
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Criminalization of South Sudan's Gold Sector
    The Criminalization of South Sudan’s Gold Sector Kleptocratic Networks and the Gold Trade in Kapoeta By the Enough Project April 2020* A Precious Resource in an Arid Land Within the area historically known as the state of Eastern Equatoria, Kapoeta is a semi-arid rangeland of clay soil dotted with short, thorny shrubs and other vegetation.1 Precious resources lie below this desolate landscape. Eastern Equatoria, along with the region historically known as Central Equatoria, contains some of the most important and best-known sites for artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASM). Some estimates put the number of miners at 60,000 working at 80 different locations in the area, including Nanaknak, Lauro (Didinga Hills), Napotpot, and Namurnyang. Locals primarily use traditional mining techniques, panning for gold from seasonal streams in various villages. The work provides miners’ families resources to support their basic needs.2 Kapoeta’s increasingly coveted gold resources are being smuggled across the border into Kenya with the active complicity of local and national governments. This smuggling network, which involves international mining interests, has contributed to increased militarization.3 Armed actors and corrupt networks are fueling low-intensity conflicts over land, particularly over the ownership of mining sites, and causing the militarization of gold mining in the area. Poor oversight and conflicts over the control of resources between the Kapoeta government and the national government in Juba enrich opportunistic actors both inside and outside South Sudan. Inefficient regulation and poor gold outflows have helped make ASM an ideal target for capture by those who seek to finance armed groups, perpetrate violence, exploit mining communities, and exacerbate divisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Mining in South Sudan: Opportunities and Risks for Local Communities
    » REPORT JANUARY 2016 MINING IN SOUTH SUDAN: OPPORTUNITIES AND RISKS FOR LOCAL COMMUNITIES BASELINE ASSESSMENT OF SMALL-SCALE AND ARTISANAL GOLD MINING IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EQUATORIA STATES, SOUTH SUDAN MINING IN SOUTH SUDAN FOREWORD We are delighted to present you the findings of an assessment conducted between February and May 2015 in two states of South Sudan. With this report, based on dozens of interviews, focus group discussions and community meetings, a multi-disciplinary team of civil society and government representatives from South Sudan are for the first time shedding light on the country’s artisanal and small-scale mining sector. The picture that emerges is a remarkable one: artisanal gold mining in South Sudan ‘employs’ more than 60,000 people and might indirectly benefit almost half a million people. The vast majority of those involved in artisanal mining are poor rural families for whom alluvial gold mining provides critical income to supplement their subsistence livelihood of farming and cattle rearing. Ostensibly to boost income for the cash-strapped government, artisanal mining was formalized under the Mining Act and subsequent Mineral Regulations. However, owing to inadequate information-sharing and a lack of government mining sector staff at local level, artisanal miners and local communities are not aware of these rules. In reality there is almost no official monitoring of artisanal or even small-scale mining activities. Despite the significant positive impact on rural families’ income, the current form of artisanal mining does have negative impacts on health, the environment and social practices. With most artisanal, small-scale and exploration mining taking place in rural areas with abundant small arms and limited presence of government security forces, disputes over land access and ownership exacerbate existing conflicts.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Resettlement Action Plan Report
    Public Disclosure Authorized Upgrading of the NADAPAL-JUBA ROAD Public Disclosure Authorized from Gravel to Paved (Bitumen) Standards FINAL RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN REPORT Public Disclosure Authorized Issued on: November 6th, 2013 EMPLOYER: Ministry of Transport, Roads and Bridges, Government of Republic of South Sudan CONSULTANT: Public Disclosure Authorized SMEC INTERNATIONAL PTY LIMITED, AUSTRALIA REVISED BY: Ing. MRS. RITA OHENE SARFOH i | P a g e Table of Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................. vi List of Figures ........................................................................................................................................ vi Acronyms ................................................................................................................................................. vii Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... ix Chapter 1Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 The Statements of Objectives........................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Brief Description
    [Show full text]
  • Central Equatoria Eastern Equatoria Jonglei Lakes
    For Humanitarian Purposes Only SOUTH SUDAN Production date: 10 Mar 2017 Eastern Equatoria State - WASH INDICATOR REACH calculated the areas more likely to have WASH needs basing the estimation on the data collected between January and February 2017 with the Area of Knowledge (AoK) approach, using the following methEodotloghy. iopia The indicator was created by averaging the percentages of key informants (KIs) reporting on the J o n g l e i following for specific settlements: - Accessibility to safe drinking water 0% indicates a reported impossibility to access safe drinking water by all KIs, while 100% indicates safe drinking water was reported accessible by each KI. Only assessed settlements are shown on the map. Values for different settlements have been averaged L a k e s and represented with hexagons 10km wide. Kapoeta Lopa County Kapoeta East North County County C e n t r a l E a s t e r n E q u a t o r i a Imehejek E q u a t o r i a Lohutok Kapoeta South County Narus Torit Torit County Budi County Magwi Lotukei Ikotos County Pageri Parajok Magwi County Nimule Kenya Uganda Sudan 0 25 50 km Data sources: Ethiopia Settlements assessed Boundaries WASH indicator Thematic indicators: REACH Administrative boundaries: UNOCHA; State capital International 0.81 - 1 Settlements: UNOCHA; County capital 0.61 - 0.8 Coordinate System:GCS WGS 1984 C.A.R. County Contact: [email protected] Principal town 0.41 - 0.6 Note: Data, designations and boundaries contained Juba State Village 0.21 - 0.4 on this map are not warranted to be error-free and do not imply acceptance by the REACH partners, Disputed area associates, donors or any other stakeholder D.R.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocv Implementation in South Sudan
    UPDATES ON CHOLERA CONTROL 5th Meeting of the GTFCC Working Group on Oral AND ORAL CHOLERA VACCINE Cholera Vaccine (5th to 6th USE IN SOUTH SUDAN December 2018) OUTLINE 1. Humanitarian context and situation 2. Cholera control priorities 3. Status on cholera control priorities 4. Use of oral cholera vaccines in 2018 5. Priorities for 2019 HUMANITARIAN SITUATION AND CONTEXT 1. Grade 3 protracted crisis since 2013 2. Severe food insecurity – 6.1million (59% of population) – 1.7 million on brink of famine 3. 1.96 million IDPs & 2.47million refugees to neighboring countries 4. Access to improved sanitation facilities - <10% 5. Access to safe water (improved water sources) ~ 60% 6. Weak health system - physical access <50% CHOLERA SOUTH SUDAN Year Cases Deaths CFR (%) • South Sudan endemic for cholera 2004 0 0 0 2005 0 0 0 • Since the 2013 crisis onset – 2006 19,277 588 2.9 2007 22,412 411 1.8 cholera outbreaks – 2014 - 2017 2008 27,017 154 0.57 2009 48,035 60 0.13 • Between 2014-2018 a total of 2010 0 0 0 2011 0 0 0 28,676 cases & 644 deaths 2012 0 0 0 2013 0 0 0 reported 2014 6,421 167 2.6 2015 1,818 41 2.2 2016 4,349 83 1.9 • No new confirmed cholera cases 2017 16,088 353 2.2 2018 0 0 0 since 18 December 2017 Total 145,417 1,857 1 • No confirmed cases in 2018 PRIORITIES Hotspot maps CHOLERA SOUTH SUDAN Year Cases Deaths CFR (%) • South Sudan is endemic for cholera and has experienced cholera 2004 0 0 0 outbreaks every year since April 2005 0 0 0 2014 2006 19,277 588 2.9 • Since 2014, at least 28,590 cholera 2007 22,412 411 1.8 cases including
    [Show full text]
  • Lotome Peace Dialogue Resolution
    AGREEMENT ON COMMUNITY PEACE AND RECONCILIATION DIALOGUE AMONG THE COMMUNITIES OF DIDINGA, KATEBO AND LORUAMA OF BUDI AND IKWOTO COUNTIES, EASTERN EQUATORIA STATE, REPUBLIC OF SOUTH SUDAN HELD FROM 2g1H TO 31ST OF JANUARY, 2OL5 IN LOTOME, LOSITE PAYAM OF IKWOTO COUNTY ORGANIZED BY CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF TORIT, JUSTICE AND PEACE PROGRAM I I I \rll , \,l.5q"],"\ {- We the representatives of Didinga, Katebo and Loruama people met in Lotome, Losite Payam of lkwoto County between 29th to 31't January,2OI5, under the mediation of Caritas - Torit/ Catholic Diocese of Torit, supported by pax for a peace and reconciliation dialogue, committing ourselves to previous peace and reconciliation resolutions, we do hereby resolve as follows; 1.. Recognizing the importance of our mutual peace, security and adverse effects of violence, we shall renounce permanently any resort to cattle raiding, revenge killings and any form of violence in our communities (communities, government and development partners) 2. We hereafter allow freedom of movement of our people among our communities without any hindrance or threat of violence. We also agree to stop road ambushes immediately (by youth) 3. cease permanently from cattle raiding/theft, killings and any form of violence. We shall jointly ensure that criminals among our communities who involve in these acts are reported to relevant authorities (byyouth and chiefs) 4. We also strongly denounce violence as a form of problem solving. We shall follow the conventional government structures to address any form of conflict among us (government and communities) 5. Didinga criminals in Losite Payam should be returned back to BUDI County.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Hindering Didinga Women's
    Didinga Women & Development All levels of government shall…enact laws to combat harmful customs and tradi- tions which undermine the dignity and status of women Women shall be accorded full and equal dignity of the person with men Women shall have the right to participate equally with men in public life. Article 16, the Transitional Constitution of the Republic of South Sudan, 2011, Factors hindering Didinga Women’s Contribution to Development Hellen Nauren Atiol September 2014 Dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree of Master of Arts in Development and Emergency Practice Centre for Development and Emergency Practice Oxford Brookes University Abstract The significance for gender equality and women’s empowerment is supported with the fact that all individuals deserve to live a life of their own choosing supported with all the basic rights. Increasing women’s agency so that they have the ability to make their own choices can contribute to economic efficiency and the achievement of key development out- comes. This research demonstrates how external factors such as conflict and insecurity, weak governance and poverty, coupled with internal factors rooted in cultural values enforced by the patriarchal dominance completely disempowers the Didinga women of South Sudan and affects their potential of effective contribution towards development. The study is based on an empirical form of qualitative research, carried out through in- formal interviews with the Didinga women in various regions of Budi County, located in Eastern Equatoria South Sudan, where participants reveal the perception and attitude towards women taking a more active and aggressive role towards change in the community.
    [Show full text]
  • Livelihoods Zone Map and Descriptions for South Sudan
    LIVELIHOODS ZONE MAP AND DESCRIPTIONS FOR THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH SUDAN (UPDATED) A REPORT OF THE FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK (FEWS NET) August 2018 SOUTH SUDAN Livelihood Zone Map and Descriptions August 2018 Acknowledgements and Disclaimer This exercise was undertaken by FEWS NET and partners including the Government of South Sudan (GoSS), the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), the National Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security (NMAFS), and UN agencies including World Food Programme (WFP) and Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Special thanks are extended to the core national facilitator’s team, especially John Pangech, Director General Planning, NMAFS; Abraham Arop Ayuel, Planning Officer, NMAFS; Philip Dau, Director Monitoring and Evaluation, NBS; Joice Jore, Coordinator, Food Security Technical Secretariat/NBS; John Vuga, Programme Officer, WFP/VAM; Evans Solomon Kenyi, Food Security Officer, FAO; and Mark Nyeko Acire, Food Security Officer, FAO. In addition, thanks to all state representatives who contributed inputs into the updated livelihoods zone descriptions. The Livelihood Zoning workshop and this report were led by Gavriel Langford and Daison Ngirazi, consultants to FEWS NET, with technical support from Antazio Drabe, National Technical Manager and James Guma, Assistant National Technical Manager of FEWS NET South Sudan. This report will form part of the knowledge base for FEWS NET’s food security monitoring activities in South Sudan. The publication was prepared under the United States Agency for International Development Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWS NET) Indefinite Quantity Contract, AID-OAA-I-12-00006, Task Order 1 (AIDOAA-TO-12-00003), TO4 (AID-OAA- TO-16-00015). The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government.
    [Show full text]
  • FSL Cluster Coordinator Mission Report to Torit (Former Eastern Equatoria State): 23–25Th July 2019
    FSL cluster coordinator mission report to Torit (former Eastern Equatoria State): 23–25th July 2019 Mission purpose: support FSLC partners and understand the changing context across Torit and western EES: Magwi/ Lafon/ Ikwotos) Objective: Support FSLC partners in Torit through the FSL State sub cluster with field mission to rural Torit/ Lafon: Tues 23rd: travel to Torit; context analysis with cluster partners: o Participatory mapping with FSLC partners: drivers & severity of food insecurity Wed 24th: attend cluster meeting in Torit: o Present on functions/ principles of coordination/ essentials of integration o Mapping exercise showing partners: transitioning towards resilience & integration with other sectors o Briefing with FAO focal point Thurs 25th: o Briefing with WFP head FO and FSLC focal point; o Return to Juba Photo of Imatong mountain courtesy of AVSI colleagues operating in Ikwotos 1 The mission report below: 1. Looks at the wider FSL context across the four counties through discussions and mapping exercise with FSLC partners; 2. Looks at the FSL cluster after attending and presenting at the July 24th meeting at the MoA in Torit town with suggestions on simple tools to harness the key information for coordination: updated mailing lists for information dissemination and participatory mapping at payam and even boma level of who is doing what and where in each county; 3. Looks at the range of activities and foot print that FSLC partners have across the four counties given the brief time we had together; and the finally 4. Some follow up actions; the most important being the (I) participatory mapping who/ what/ where partners at Payam level for each county; (II) update mailing list; and (III) updated contact details for Magwi County level sub cluster.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Citizenship the Nuer Between Ethiopia and the Sudan ABORNE Workshop on Sudan’S Borders, April 2011 Dereje Feyissa
    Alternative citizenship The Nuer between Ethiopia and the Sudan ABORNE Workshop on Sudan’s Borders, April 2011 Dereje Feyissa Abstract A lot has been written about state borders as constraints to local populations who are often ‘artificially’ split into two and at times more national states (Asiwaju 1985; Kolossov 2005). The Nuer, like many other pastoral communities arbitrarily divided by a state border, have experienced the Ethio-Sudanese border as a constraint, in as much as they were cut off from wet season villages in the Sudan and dry season camps in Ethiopia. As recent literature on the border has shown, however, state borders function not only as constraints but also as opportunities (Nugent 2002), and even as ‘resources’ (Dereje and Hohene 2010). The paper examines how the Nuer have positively signified state border by tapping into - taking advantage of their cross-border settlements -fluctuating opportunity structures within the Ethiopian and Sudanese states through alternative citizenship. Nuer strategic action is reinforced by a flexible identity system within which border-crossing is a norm. Sudan's Southeastern frontier: The Toposa and their Neighbours (abstract) The Topòsa and some of their neighbours have long been among the groups in particular remoteness from the political and economic metabolism of the state system. Until recently, the borders of the Sudan with three other nations, Uganda, Kenya and Ethiopia, that touch on their area could be considered mere notions and lines on maps of another world. This situation has substantially changed since the 2nd Sudanese Civil War – and with it the meaning of terms like “their area”.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Sudan at Odds with Itself
    Allen et al. Schomerus ‘I found the report fascinating and also disturbing in equal measure. …While state building efforts are rightly focused on building up structures from the ground they fail to address the primary need to ensure that such institutions are properly reformed to become independent and impartial institutions…To address these pressing issues and to maximise the positive momentum generated SOUTHERN ODD SUDAN AT from the elections and the international focus on Southern Sudan at this time, these issues needs to be discussed publicly with all key states, governments and civil society stakeholders who hold the future of Southern Sudan in their hands. I would urge action sooner rather than later.’ Akbar Khan, Director, Legal & Constitutional Affairs Division, Commonwealth Secretariat ‘The great strength of the report is the accuracy of its voicing of common concerns – it forms an excellent representation of people’s perceptions and experiences, making an important corollary to the current focus on high-level political negotiations and structures. As the report emphasises at the outset, the current focus of Sudanese governments and their international advisors on the technicalities and procedural aspects of planning for the referendum and its outcome needs to be countered by the more holistic approach advocated by this report.’ Cherry Leonardi, Durham University ‘A very important and timely contribution to the current debates…The report offers an invaluable S insight in some of the key issues and dilemma’s Southern Sudan and
    [Show full text]
  • SOUTH SUDAN Budi County Reference Map
    SOUTH SUDAN Budi County reference map SUDAN ETHIOPIA CAR Kapoeta North DRC KENYA Lafon UGANDA Kalineuri Manwayti Lonukeaguman Kapoeta East Lotopocho Chawa Kudule Taguk Karenga Yei Longarim Komowu Lado Beleu Kidepo Bobite Tele Lotang Botie Katagan Voron Tuguru Laryok Arungateli Tia Kolinmum Iwochi EASTERN EQUATORIA Kapoeta South Kugulu Welamoi Napak Idetak Lorangi Watit Budi Lauru Lomingushe Naberigalong Kirongu Nangolerita Torit Naguri Lauro Tala Kirongen Longumu Mugurcecth Kochol Kachaching Lorok Faraksika Murukeris Lobele Kibongorok Mahira B Mahira A Ranyo Loturut Ngaboroch Nhuka Chaghari Logumak Zigora Kilanya Kataruk Lokolingero Tulugi Lokwamur Loturuch Kauda Chayrong Itigin Ddinga Merileli Naturua Nathilani Kilingir Lobitang Moru Eta Lotedo Nangayam Naterowolo Alimorok Thimtijejero Lopero Logigi Iwowa Itigip Naperetom Charet Chakari Lochar Kiduri Nagatale Naqichot Lokwamoru Kitela Buthi Kaluknyimi Digidok Malala Nathithi Komoriya Kapua Kitamo Lolimo Naligedi Loudo Owerak Chukudum Adimakuj Durok Lorogela Logak Lorus Loro Nadongolomo Larema Locoto Cherokaj Manajok Loeka Karena Dologa Ibahany Lomeyan Lotiki Oreg Hiria Lotono Nalingaro Lotim Laerdi Nagula Lotathe Masawa Mogina Lorema Napedur Kikilai Kakelay Rokil Lotome Lomilila Nathaho Marakeng Kilkil Nyala Awoi Namoja Agoro Piobokoi Lotukei Kugwa Lomothing Ikotos Bogora Latome 1 Komoloich International boundary Amtaini State boundary County boundary Tule Undetermined boundary Abyei region Narus Country capital Bira Administrative centre/County capital Principal town Secondary town Village UGANDA Primary road Secondary road Tertiary road Main river 0 5 10 km The administrative boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. Final boundary between the Republic of Sudan and the Republic of South Sudan has not yet been determined.
    [Show full text]