DOCSLIB.ORG

FSL Cluster Coordinator Mission Report to Torit (Former Eastern Equatoria State): 23–25Th July 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

FSL cluster coordinator mission report to Torit (former Eastern Equatoria State): 23–25th July 2019 Mission purpose: support FSLC partners and understand the changing context across Torit and western EES: Magwi/ Lafon/ Ikwotos) Objective: Support FSLC partners in Torit through the FSL State sub cluster with field mission to rural Torit/ Lafon: Tues 23rd: travel to Torit; context analysis with cluster partners: o Participatory mapping with FSLC partners: drivers & severity of food insecurity Wed 24th: attend cluster meeting in Torit: o Present on functions/ principles of coordination/ essentials of integration o Mapping exercise showing partners: transitioning towards resilience & integration with other sectors o Briefing with FAO focal point Thurs 25th: o Briefing with WFP head FO and FSLC focal point; o Return to Juba Photo of Imatong mountain courtesy of AVSI colleagues operating in Ikwotos 1 The mission report below: 1. Looks at the wider FSL context across the four counties through discussions and mapping exercise with FSLC partners; 2. Looks at the FSL cluster after attending and presenting at the July 24th meeting at the MoA in Torit town with suggestions on simple tools to harness the key information for coordination: updated mailing lists for information dissemination and participatory mapping at payam and even boma level of who is doing what and where in each county; 3. Looks at the range of activities and foot print that FSLC partners have across the four counties given the brief time we had together; and the finally 4. Some follow up actions; the most important being the (I) participatory mapping who/ what/ where partners at Payam level for each county; (II) update mailing list; and (III) updated contact details for Magwi County level sub cluster. Other field missions have been longer which has provided more time for field visits with partners and even to conduct food security assessments in the field. I hope that this can be accomplished on a follow up visit. Finally a big thank you (1) to all those who gave their time during the two days I was in Torit; and (2) for the inspiring work that you continue to do under challenging circumstances. Participatory mapping of the context and hot spots across the four counties of western former EE State: Annex 2: provides the January 2019 IPC State analysis report with details of ALL eight counties. The following main assumptions were used to project the food security into the present period May – July. Please note which assumptions were, at this time, correct and which did not hold to be correct (and please let me know): Rainfall: FEWSNET projection Feb/ March to be normally; June / Sept normal onset of rains and expected to be above average; (rains were late by 1 month) Price trends: CLIMIS white maize price in 2019 projected to increase about 15% higher than those of 2018 and by the peak of the lean season these increase by about 25% (are we still seeing high prices at this time?); Economic crisis: expected to continue well into 2019 and possibly beyond (highly likely) Conflict & security: raiding to continue/ road insecurity persisting/ national conflict remains stable (we mapped a number of key conflict flash points with disruption to cultivation; few returnees and they will not return until the SPLA soldiers leave – national conflict is still very much a factor in Greater Torit) Income: remain same from livestock sales, mining, surplus production, sale of natural resources e.g. firewood & charcoal/ some salaried workers (please confirm) Food sources: stocks already run out or running out for most people into the lean season/ wild food options also decline/ fishing very limited/ milk & meat when livestock return in June & July (this was communicated by key informants) Humanitarian Food Assistance: WFP seasonal scale up planned for March – September as in 2018; (yes, this is happening; though disrupted in Lafon due to road access problems) Nutrition: expected to deteriorate into the lean season (likely but do not have the data to confirm) 2 Two exercises were conducted: (1) January 2019 IPC with food analysts from WFP/ FAO/ Government/ AVSI in Juba; and (2) July 2019 with NGO FSLC partners in Torit: WFP/ FOCUS/ CARITAS/ AVSI/ Save Children/ Plan/ BRAC/ Ark for Humanity. The findings are presented below in the tables and maps: Causes of food insecurity across the region: Chronic (July 2019) Acute (July 2019) Acute (January 2019) Lack of HYV seeds; input supply 1. Conflict/ insecurity/ -Focus on cattle raiding from Kapoeta & (agro dealers/ market demand); displacement from Budi with agro pastoralists in Lafon & Structural/ cultural/ poverty farms (fear of potential east Ikotos. Banditry along roads since factors (risk aversion) against returnees due to iG 2013; especially 2015 - 2017 changes to production systems military presence still (lack capital for high input seen as threat) #1= rank; price rises of staple foods: systems) maize & sorghum; after 2016 disruption Traditional production systems: 2. Continued macro of trade routes & insecurity/ poor road small acreage/ labour shortage/ economic crisis: infrastructure/ currency devaluation; limited ox plough adoption/ currency depreciation especially given the high market limited surplus production & high food prices dependency of ALL HHs especially urban Seasonal rains/ poor road & agro pastoral network/ road closure/ severe disruption to market access/ #1= rank: Dry spells in 2018: especially delivery of food & emergency 3. Climatic: especially Torit/ east Ikwotos/ Lafon/ west Magwi crop kits floods & dry spells & flooding Gender division of labour: women main farmers 4. Pests: especially FAW -White Ear Cob migration July – August (overburdened with social/ since July 2017 and north and returning south in dry season reproductive & productive work) wildlife to Kidepo valley Very high post-harvest losses (PHL) -Especially long duration sorghum Dependency syndrome: 3 5. Wild fires during Dec – Jan; high preference for decades of relief; time spent in long duration sorghum camps when 100% dependent; decline in the male cultivation Stability: protracted erosion of assets 2015 – 2018 especially teams of past livestock sales; overuse of forest resources (charcoal, leaves, poles etc.) See January 2019 mapping exercise from the IPC analysis with the EES team showing the main livelihood zones across the region: Green Belt Highland forest & sorghum; and Agro pastoral cattle & sorghum Semi arid pastoral & agro pastoralism For full descriptions of these livelihood zones refer to the FEWSNET (2018) livelihood zones in South Sudan manual: https://fscluster.org/south-sudan-rep/document/south-sudan-livelihood-zones-2018 3 Livelihood zones across Greater Torit (Magwi/ Lafon/ Torit/ Ikwotos counties): Context related discussions at MOA and the FSLC meeting (July 24th) for the four counties Lafon, Torit, Magwi and Ikwotos (term being used ‘Greater Torit’) included: Farming outlook: better than 2018; Late rains; but generally good 1st season; active pre- positioning of cereals & seeds by WFO and FAO (with seeds delivered on time); MOA supportive of the planned storage depot to be built in Torit (previously supplies came to Torit from Kapoeta); currently consumption of the green maize harvest; with preparation for the 2nd season; FAW surveillance estimated that 75% farms assessed were infected – considered alarming; Returns: Agriculture DG estimated (and triangulated with WFP FSNMS team) that returning citizens were few: about 35% returned to Magwi (especially around Nimule); many partial households moving back and forth between refugee camp and farms; populations to Lafon, Torit and Ikwotos considered to be far lower than the % in Magwi; Conditional GFD seen by local authorities as positive move from WFP; Security: calm with sporadic cases of banditry along Nimule – Juba road; and a criminal killing along Torit – Imatong road; Road access: creating havoc (poor road network plus rains) for field missions and especially WFP cereal/ nutrition supplement deliveries; KIs even describe out migration of Lafon 4 residents to Juba and other locations as GFD delivery has not been possible (no details of numbers). Focal points of the four FSNMS teams presented, at the FSLC meeting, their summary findings were collectively summarized by the county IPC focal point: “Better rainfall then 2018; food security generally promising by July which had been poor owing to the unusually long lean season (shortage of cereal stocks due to the poor 2018 harvest). Rains were initially late meaning the green harvest (now) is one month later than ‘normal’. Concern though for Lafon which is, currently, badly affected by floods. FAO: flood affected HHs to be part of the 2nd season vulnerability criteria for emergency crop kit distribution; County level mapping of food insecure hot spots with FSLC partners – July 2019: Magwi: Pre crisis Green Belt potential far from being realised as few people are cultivating: Farming population thought to be only 35% (approx..) of that in 2016; Lowa region (west): 100% farmers migrated in 2016 very few have returned; Pajok region (east) some returns but largely transient farmers ‘back & forth’ from refugee camp; Two locations where Bor Dinka cattle identified now; not just herders: but soldiers, well armed and capable of disrupting cultivation; Wide spread presence of SPLA soldiers is a major deterrent for returnees from Uganda. 5 Ikwotos: poorer natural resource endowment on the leeward/ dry side
Recommended publications
  • The Criminalization of South Sudan's Gold Sector

    The Criminalization of South Sudan's Gold Sector

    The Criminalization of South Sudan’s Gold Sector Kleptocratic Networks and the Gold Trade in Kapoeta By the Enough Project April 2020* A Precious Resource in an Arid Land Within the area historically known as the state of Eastern Equatoria, Kapoeta is a semi-arid rangeland of clay soil dotted with short, thorny shrubs and other vegetation.1 Precious resources lie below this desolate landscape. Eastern Equatoria, along with the region historically known as Central Equatoria, contains some of the most important and best-known sites for artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASM). Some estimates put the number of miners at 60,000 working at 80 different locations in the area, including Nanaknak, Lauro (Didinga Hills), Napotpot, and Namurnyang. Locals primarily use traditional mining techniques, panning for gold from seasonal streams in various villages. The work provides miners’ families resources to support their basic needs.2 Kapoeta’s increasingly coveted gold resources are being smuggled across the border into Kenya with the active complicity of local and national governments. This smuggling network, which involves international mining interests, has contributed to increased militarization.3 Armed actors and corrupt networks are fueling low-intensity conflicts over land, particularly over the ownership of mining sites, and causing the militarization of gold mining in the area. Poor oversight and conflicts over the control of resources between the Kapoeta government and the national government in Juba enrich opportunistic actors both inside and outside South Sudan. Inefficient regulation and poor gold outflows have helped make ASM an ideal target for capture by those who seek to finance armed groups, perpetrate violence, exploit mining communities, and exacerbate divisions.
  • Magwi County

    Magwi County

    Resettlement, Resource Conflicts, Livelihood Revival and Reintegration in South Sudan A study of the processes and institutional issues at the local level in Magwi County by N. Shanmugaratnam Noragric Department of International Environment and Development No. Report Noragric Studies 5 8 RESETTLEMENT, RESOURCE CONFLICTS, LIVELIHOOD REVIVAL AND REINTEGRATION IN SOUTH SUDAN A study of the processes and institutional issues at the local level in Magwi County By N. Shanmugaratnam Noragric Report No. 58 December 2010 Department of International Environment and Development Studies, Noragric Norwegian University of Life Sciences, UMB Noragric is the Department of International Environment and Development Studies at the Norwegian University of Life Sciences (UMB). Noragric’s activities include research, education and assignments, focusing particularly, but not exclusively, on developing countries and countries with economies in transition. Noragric Reports present findings from various studies and assignments, including programme appraisals and evaluations. This Noragric Report was commissioned by the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad) under the framework agreement with UMB which is administrated by Noragric. Extracts from this publication may only be reproduced after prior consultation with the employer of the assignment (Norad) and with the consultant team leader (Noragric). The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed in this publication are entirely those of the authors and cannot be attributed directly to the Department of International Environment and Development Studies (UMB/Noragric). Shanmugaratnam, N. Resettlement, resource conflicts, livelihood revival and reintegration in South Sudan: A study of the processes and institutional issues at the local level in Magwi County. Noragric Report No. 58 (December 2010) Department of International Environment and Development Studies, Noragric Norwegian University of Life Sciences (UMB) P.O.
  • Mining in South Sudan: Opportunities and Risks for Local Communities

    Mining in South Sudan: Opportunities and Risks for Local Communities

    » REPORT JANUARY 2016 MINING IN SOUTH SUDAN: OPPORTUNITIES AND RISKS FOR LOCAL COMMUNITIES BASELINE ASSESSMENT OF SMALL-SCALE AND ARTISANAL GOLD MINING IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EQUATORIA STATES, SOUTH SUDAN MINING IN SOUTH SUDAN FOREWORD We are delighted to present you the findings of an assessment conducted between February and May 2015 in two states of South Sudan. With this report, based on dozens of interviews, focus group discussions and community meetings, a multi-disciplinary team of civil society and government representatives from South Sudan are for the first time shedding light on the country’s artisanal and small-scale mining sector. The picture that emerges is a remarkable one: artisanal gold mining in South Sudan ‘employs’ more than 60,000 people and might indirectly benefit almost half a million people. The vast majority of those involved in artisanal mining are poor rural families for whom alluvial gold mining provides critical income to supplement their subsistence livelihood of farming and cattle rearing. Ostensibly to boost income for the cash-strapped government, artisanal mining was formalized under the Mining Act and subsequent Mineral Regulations. However, owing to inadequate information-sharing and a lack of government mining sector staff at local level, artisanal miners and local communities are not aware of these rules. In reality there is almost no official monitoring of artisanal or even small-scale mining activities. Despite the significant positive impact on rural families’ income, the current form of artisanal mining does have negative impacts on health, the environment and social practices. With most artisanal, small-scale and exploration mining taking place in rural areas with abundant small arms and limited presence of government security forces, disputes over land access and ownership exacerbate existing conflicts.
  • Water for Eastern Equatoria (W4EE)

    Water for Eastern Equatoria (W4EE)

    Water for Eastern Equatoria (W4EE) he first integrated water resource management (IWRM) project of its kind in South Sudan, Water Water for Eastern for Eastern Equatoria (W4EE) was launched in Components 2013 as part of the broader bilateral water Tprogramme funded through the Dutch Multiannual Equatoria (W4EE) Strategic Plan for South Sudan (2012–2015). W4EE focuses on three interrelated From the very beginning, W4EE was planned as a pilot components: IWRM programme in the Torit and Kapoeta States of The role of integrated water resource manage- Eastern Equatoria focusing on holistic management of the ment in fostering resilience, delivering economic Kenneti catchment, conflict-sensitive oversight of water Component 1: Integrated water resource management of the development, improving health, and promoting for productive use such as livestock and farming, and Kenneti catchment and surrounds peace in a long-term process. improved access to safe drinking water as well as sanitati- on and hygiene. The goal has always been to replicate key Component 2: Conflict-sensitive management of water for learnings and best practice in other parts of South Sudan. productive use contributes to increased, sustained productivity, value addition in agriculture, horticulture, and livestock The Kenneti catchment is very important to the Eastern Equatoria region for economic, social, and biodiversity reasons. The river has hydropower potential, supports the Component 3: Safely managed and climate-resilient drinking livelihoods of thousands of households, and the surroun- water services and improved sanitation and hygiene are available, ding area hosts a national park with forests and wetlands operated and maintained in a sustainable manner. as well as wild animals and migratory birds.
  • South Sudan Climate Vulnerability Profile: Sector- and Location-Specific Climate Risks and Resilience Recommendations

    South Sudan Climate Vulnerability Profile: Sector- and Location-Specific Climate Risks and Resilience Recommendations

    PHOTO CREDIT: USAID|SOUTH SUDAN SOUTH SUDAN CLIMATE VULNERABILITY PROFILE: SECTOR- AND LOCATION-SPECIFIC CLIMATE RISKS AND RESILIENCE RECOMMENDATIONS MAY 2019 This document was prepared for USAID/South Sudan by The Cadmus Group LLC under USAID’s Global Environmental Management Support Program, Contract Number GS-10F-0105J. Authors: Colin Quinn, Ashley Fox, Kye Baroang, Dan Evans, Melq Gomes, and Josh Habib The Cadmus Group, LLC The contents are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................................ 1 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................................................................. 2 HISTORICAL AND FUTURE CLIMATE CHANGE IN SOUTH SUDAN ...................................................................... 2 AGRICULTURE VULNERABILITY AND RESILIENCE ........................................................................................................ 3 CLIMATE CHANGE, MIGRATION AND CONFLICT ....................................................................................................... 5 THE VULNERABILITY OF THE SUDD WETLAND ............................................................................................................ 6 POTENTIAL AREAS OF INVESTMENT TO IMPROVE CLIMATE RESILIENCE ..........................................................
  • Symptoms and Causes: Insecurity and Underdevelopment in Eastern

    Symptoms and Causes: Insecurity and Underdevelopment in Eastern

    sudanHuman Security Baseline Assessment issue brief Small Arms Survey Number 16 April 2010 Symptoms and causes Insecurity and underdevelopment in Eastern Equatoria astern Equatoria state (EES) is The survey was supplemented by qual- 24,789 (± 965) households in the one of the most volatile and itative interviews and focus group three counties contain at least one E conflict-prone states in South- discussions with key stakeholders in firearm. ern Sudan. An epicentre of the civil EES and Juba in January 2010. Respondents cited traditional lead- war (1983–2005), EES saw intense Key findings include: ers (clan elders and village chiefs) fighting between the Sudanese Armed as the primary security providers Across the entire sample, respond- Forces (SAF) and the Sudan People’s in their areas (90 per cent), followed ents ranked education and access Liberation Army (SPLA), as well by neighbours (48 per cent) and reli- to adequate health care as their numerous armed groups supported gious leaders (38 per cent). Police most pressing concerns, followed by both sides, leaving behind a legacy presence was only cited by 27 per by clean water. Food was also a top of landmines and unexploded ordnance, cent of respondents and the SPLA concern in Torit and Ikotos. Security high numbers of weapons in civilian by even fewer (6 per cent). ranked at or near the bottom of hands, and shattered social and com- Attitudes towards disarmament overall concerns in all counties. munity relations. were positive, with around 68 per When asked about their greatest EES has also experienced chronic cent of the total sample reporting a security concerns, respondents in food insecurity, a lack of basic services, willingness to give up their firearms, Torit and Ikotos cited cattle rustling, and few economic opportunities.
  • Cross Border Intervention for Refugees Returnees and South Sudanese Host Community, Palabek Camp Lamwo District and Ikotos County)

    Cross Border Intervention for Refugees Returnees and South Sudanese Host Community, Palabek Camp Lamwo District and Ikotos County)

    Cross-border Refugees-Returnees Need Assessment (Palabek Camp Lamwo District and Ikotos County) Photo: Returnees Children footing to Ikotos Town Papa John Martin Sebastian Monitoring & Evaluation Officer, AVSI-Foundation South Sudan. Contact: Email address: [email protected] Mobile Phone: +211929840006 Skype: papajohnmartin30 Ikotos County, Torit State ICRROSS (Cross border intervention for Refugees Returnees and South Sudanese Host Community, Palabek Camp Lamwo District and Ikotos County) 1 Table of Context I. ACRONYMS: ……………………………………………………………………………….…………………. 2 II. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: ………………………………………………………………………………….. 3 III. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: …………………………………………………………………………………. 3 IV. Introduction: ………………………………………………………………………………………………... 5 (a) Background: ………………………………………………………………………………………… 5 1. Methodology: ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 5 2. Objectives: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 6 3. Key Findings: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 6 A. Household Information: …………………………………………………………………….. 6 B. Relatives in Ikotos County: …………………………………………………………………. 7 C. Experience of returning back to South Sudan: ……………………………………. 8 D. Plan for the Future: ……………………………………………………………………………. 9 4. Recommendation: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 10 I. ACRONYMS List of Acronyms ICRROSS: Cross border Intervention for Returnees Refugees of South Sudan and the Host community FE: Financial Education CEVSI: Cooperazione E Sviluppo AVSI: Association of Volunteers in International Service CBI: Cash base intervention AICS:
  • Operational Deployment Plan Template

    Operational Deployment Plan Template

    Country: Republic of South Sudan Index Facility Address States County Facility Name Type of HF Closest Town / City number (Payam) 1 Central Equatoria State Terekeka Nyori Moridi PHCU PHCU Moridi 2 Central Equatoria State Terekeka Reggo Makamagor PHCU PHCU Makamagor 3 Central Equatoria State Terekeka Tali Payam Mijiki PHCU PHCU Mijiki 4 Central Equatoria State Terekeka Nyori Kuda PHCU PHCU Kuda 5 Central Equatoria State Terekeka Rijiong Jonko PHCU PHCU Jonkok 6 Central Equatoria State Terekeka Terekeka Terekeka PHCC PHCC Terekeka 7 Central Equatoria State Juba Rokon Miriko PHCU PHCU Rokon 8 Central Equatoria State Juba Ganji Ganji PHCC PHCC Ganji 9 Central Equatoria State Yei Tore Tore PHCC PHCC Yei 10 Central Equatoria State Yei Tore Goli PHCU PHCU Yei 11 Central Equatoria State Yei Yei Pakula PHCU PHCU Yei 12 Central Equatoria State Yei Mugwo Jombu PHCU PHCU Yei 13 Central Equatoria State Yei Tore Bandame PHCU PHCU Yei 14 Central Equatoria State Yei Otogo Kejiko PHCU PHCU Yei 15 Central Equatoria State Yei Lasu Kirikwa PHCU PHCU Yei 16 Central Equatoria State Yei Otogo Rubeke PHCU PHCU Yei 17 Central Equatoria State Yei Yei BAKITA PHCC PHCC YEI 18 Central Equatoria State Yei Yei Marther PHCC PHCC YEI 19 Central Equatoria State Yei Yei EPC CLINIC - PHCU PHCU YEI 20 Central Equatoria State Yei Yei YEI HOSPITAL HOSPITAL YEI 21 Central Equatoria State Yei CHD Yei County Cold Chain County Cold Chain YEI 22 Central Equatoria State Yei CHD Yei County Cold Chain County Cold Chain YEI 23 Central Equatoria State Yei CHD Yei County Cold Chain County
  • South Sudan's Renewable Energy Potential

    South Sudan's Renewable Energy Potential

    UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE www.usip.org SPECIAL REPORT 2301 Constitution Ave., NW • Washington, DC 20037 • 202.457.1700 • fax 202.429.6063 ABOUT THE REPORT David Mozersky and Daniel M. Kammen In the context of the civil war with no end in sight in South Sudan, this report outlines how a donor-led shift from the current total reliance on diesel to renewable energy can deliver short-term humanitarian cost savings while creating a longer- term building block for peace in the form of a clean energy infrastructure. The report is supported by the Africa South Sudan’s Renewable program at the United States Institute of Peace. ABOUT THE AUTHORS Energy Potential David Mozersky is the cofounder of Energy Peace Partners and the founding director of the Program on Conflict, Climate Change and Green Development at the University of California, A Building Block for Peace Berkeley’s Renewable and Appropriate Energy Lab. He has been involved with peacebuilding and conflict resolution efforts in South Sudan for more than fifteen years. Daniel Kammen is a professor and chair of the Energy and Resources Group Summary and a professor in the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley. He served as science envoy • Shortly after independence in 2011, South Sudan fell into civil war. A regional peace agree- for the US State Department in 2016 and 2017. ment has effectively collapsed, and the international community has no clear strategy on how to proceed. • The war has destroyed South Sudan’s limited infrastructure, triggering an economic implo- sion.
  • Central Equatoria Eastern Equatoria Jonglei Lakes

    Central Equatoria Eastern Equatoria Jonglei Lakes

    For Humanitarian Purposes Only SOUTH SUDAN Production date: 10 Mar 2017 Eastern Equatoria State - WASH INDICATOR REACH calculated the areas more likely to have WASH needs basing the estimation on the data collected between January and February 2017 with the Area of Knowledge (AoK) approach, using the following methEodotloghy. iopia The indicator was created by averaging the percentages of key informants (KIs) reporting on the J o n g l e i following for specific settlements: - Accessibility to safe drinking water 0% indicates a reported impossibility to access safe drinking water by all KIs, while 100% indicates safe drinking water was reported accessible by each KI. Only assessed settlements are shown on the map. Values for different settlements have been averaged L a k e s and represented with hexagons 10km wide. Kapoeta Lopa County Kapoeta East North County County C e n t r a l E a s t e r n E q u a t o r i a Imehejek E q u a t o r i a Lohutok Kapoeta South County Narus Torit Torit County Budi County Magwi Lotukei Ikotos County Pageri Parajok Magwi County Nimule Kenya Uganda Sudan 0 25 50 km Data sources: Ethiopia Settlements assessed Boundaries WASH indicator Thematic indicators: REACH Administrative boundaries: UNOCHA; State capital International 0.81 - 1 Settlements: UNOCHA; County capital 0.61 - 0.8 Coordinate System:GCS WGS 1984 C.A.R. County Contact: [email protected] Principal town 0.41 - 0.6 Note: Data, designations and boundaries contained Juba State Village 0.21 - 0.4 on this map are not warranted to be error-free and do not imply acceptance by the REACH partners, Disputed area associates, donors or any other stakeholder D.R.C.
  • South Sudan Country Operational Plan (COP)

    South Sudan Country Operational Plan (COP)

    FY 2015 South Sudan Country Operational Plan (COP) The following elements included in this document, in addition to “Budget and Target Reports” posted separately on www.PEPFAR.gov, reflect the approved FY 2015 COP for South Sudan. 1) FY 2015 COP Strategic Development Summary (SDS) narrative communicates the epidemiologic and country/regional context; methods used for programmatic design; findings of integrated data analysis; and strategic direction for the investments and programs. Note that PEPFAR summary targets discussed within the SDS were accurate as of COP approval and may have been adjusted as site- specific targets were finalized. See the “COP 15 Targets by Subnational Unit” sheets that follow for final approved targets. 2) COP 15 Targets by Subnational Unit includes approved COP 15 targets (targets to be achieved by September 30, 2016). As noted, these may differ from targets embedded within the SDS narrative document and reflect final approved targets. Approved FY 2015 COP budgets by mechanism and program area, and summary targets are posted as a separate document on www.PEPFAR.gov in the “FY 2015 Country Operational Plan Budget and Target Report.” South Sudan Country/Regional Operational Plan (COP/ROP) 2015 Strategic Direction Summary August 27, 2015 Table of Contents Goal Statement 1.0 Epidemic, Response, and Program Context 1.1 Summary statistics, disease burden and epidemic profile 1.2 Investment profile 1.3 Sustainability Profile 1.4 Alignment of PEPFAR investments geographically to burden of disease 1.5 Stakeholder engagement
  • Ocv Implementation in South Sudan

    Ocv Implementation in South Sudan

    UPDATES ON CHOLERA CONTROL 5th Meeting of the GTFCC Working Group on Oral AND ORAL CHOLERA VACCINE Cholera Vaccine (5th to 6th USE IN SOUTH SUDAN December 2018) OUTLINE 1. Humanitarian context and situation 2. Cholera control priorities 3. Status on cholera control priorities 4. Use of oral cholera vaccines in 2018 5. Priorities for 2019 HUMANITARIAN SITUATION AND CONTEXT 1. Grade 3 protracted crisis since 2013 2. Severe food insecurity – 6.1million (59% of population) – 1.7 million on brink of famine 3. 1.96 million IDPs & 2.47million refugees to neighboring countries 4. Access to improved sanitation facilities - <10% 5. Access to safe water (improved water sources) ~ 60% 6. Weak health system - physical access <50% CHOLERA SOUTH SUDAN Year Cases Deaths CFR (%) • South Sudan endemic for cholera 2004 0 0 0 2005 0 0 0 • Since the 2013 crisis onset – 2006 19,277 588 2.9 2007 22,412 411 1.8 cholera outbreaks – 2014 - 2017 2008 27,017 154 0.57 2009 48,035 60 0.13 • Between 2014-2018 a total of 2010 0 0 0 2011 0 0 0 28,676 cases & 644 deaths 2012 0 0 0 2013 0 0 0 reported 2014 6,421 167 2.6 2015 1,818 41 2.2 2016 4,349 83 1.9 • No new confirmed cholera cases 2017 16,088 353 2.2 2018 0 0 0 since 18 December 2017 Total 145,417 1,857 1 • No confirmed cases in 2018 PRIORITIES Hotspot maps CHOLERA SOUTH SUDAN Year Cases Deaths CFR (%) • South Sudan is endemic for cholera and has experienced cholera 2004 0 0 0 outbreaks every year since April 2005 0 0 0 2014 2006 19,277 588 2.9 • Since 2014, at least 28,590 cholera 2007 22,412 411 1.8 cases including