DOCSLIB.ORG

FCA Fiscal Year 2022 Proposed Budget

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FCA Fiscal Year 2022 Proposed Budget Farm Credit Administration Fiscal Year 2022 Proposed Budget and Performance Plan Farm Credit Administration FY 2022 Proposed Budget and Performance Plan Table of Contents Part I Fiscal Year 2022 Proposed Budget ................................................................................ 1 Fiscal Year 2022 Budget Overview ................................................................................................. 3 Budget Trends ................................................................................................................................. 8 Assessments ................................................................................................................................... 12 Part II Farm Credit Administration ....................................................................................... 15 Profile of the Farm Credit Administration .................................................................................... 17 FCA Internal Operations............................................................................................................... 20 Ensuring Safety and Soundness ................................................................................................... 30 Developing Regulations and Policies ............................................................................................. 37 Part III Farm Credit System .................................................................................................. 43 Profile of the Farm Credit System .................................................................................................45 Financial Condition and Performance .......................................................................................... 49 Young, Beginning, and Small Farmers and Ranchers .................................................................. 60 Market Share of Farm Debt .......................................................................................................... 63 Part IV Performance Budget FY 2022 .................................................................................. 65 Performance Budget Overview ......................................................................................................67 Desired Outcomes for Strategic Goals .......................................................................................... 69 Performance Measurement and Reporting ................................................................................... 75 i Farm Credit Administration FY 2022 Proposed Budget and Performance Plan List of Tables Table 1. Farm Credit Administration FY 2022 proposed budget ................................................... 3 Table 2. Information resource management plan initiatives ......................................................... 6 Table 3. FCA budgets, FYs 2020 – 2022 ........................................................................................ 9 Table 4. FCA actions and resulting impact .................................................................................... 10 Table 5. Budgeted sources of FCA revenue and funding, FYs 2020 – 2022 ................................. 11 Table 6. FCS assessments, FYs 2012 – 2021 ................................................................................. 12 Table 7. FCA funding, obligations, and assessment carryover, FYs 2019 and 2020 (in millions) 13 Table 8. FCA’s net cost to System borrowers, FYs 2012 – 2021 .................................................... 14 Table 9. Farmer Mac assessments, FYs 2012 – 2021 .................................................................... 14 Table 10. Full-time-equivalent staffing levels, FYs 2012 – 2022 .................................................. 21 Table 11. FCA retirement eligibility, FYs 2020 – 2025 ................................................................. 22 Table 12. FYs 2020 and 2021 locality rates ...................................................................................25 Table 13. Shared services, FY 2021 ................................................................................................25 Table 14. Competitive consulting service contracts of more than $25,000, FY 2020 ................. 26 Table 15. Competitive consulting service contracts of more than $25,000, FY 2021 ................... 27 Table data for figure 2 ................................................................................................................... 34 Table 16. Net income (dollars in millions).................................................................................... 50 Table 17. Interest margin in annualized percentages .................................................................... 51 Table 18. Profitability across System districts for the first nine months of year ........................... 51 Table 19. Gross loan growth by district and Systemwide (dollars in millions) .............................52 Table data for figure 4 ....................................................................................................................53 Table 20. FCS investments (dollars in millions) ...........................................................................54 Table 21. FCS loan quality.............................................................................................................. 55 Table 22. Systemwide debt (dollars in millions) ...........................................................................56 Table 23. FCS capital composition (dollars in millions) ............................................................... 57 Table 24. Regulatory capital ratios of FCS banks ......................................................................... 58 Table 25. YBS loans made during 2019 (as of December 31, 2019) ............................................. 62 Table 26. YBS loans outstanding (as of December 31, 2019) ....................................................... 63 Table 27. FCA performance budget, FYs 2020 – 2022 ................................................................. 67 Table 28. FY 2022 proposed budget and full-time equivalents for program activities ................ 68 ii Farm Credit Administration FY 2022 Proposed Budget and Performance Plan Table 29. Desired outcomes for strategic goals ............................................................................ 69 Table 30. Goal 1 — Performance measures ................................................................................... 71 Table 31. Budgets to achieve goal 1 ................................................................................................ 71 Table 32. Goal 2 — Performance measures ................................................................................... 73 Table 33. Budgets to achieve goal 2 ............................................................................................... 73 Table 34. Goal 3 — Performance measures ................................................................................... 74 List of Figures Figure 1. FCA organizational chart as of January 2021 ................................................................ 20 Figure 2. Farm Credit System Financial Institution Rating System (FIRS) composite ratings ... 33 Figure 3. The chartered territories of Farm Credit System banks as of January 1, 2021 ............. 46 Figure 4. Year-over-year percent change in System assets, September 2010 – 2020 ..................52 iii Farm Credit Administration FY 2022 Proposed Budget and Performance Plan List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ACA ...........................................agricultural credit association CAMELS ...................................capital, assets, management, earnings, liquidity, and sensitivity Farm Credit Act.........................Farm Credit Act of 1971, as amended Farmer Mac ...............................Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation FCA............................................Farm Credit Administration FCS or System ...........................Farm Credit System FCSIC ........................................Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation FIRREA .....................................Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act FIRS ..........................................Financial Institution Rating System FLCA .........................................Federal land credit association FTE ............................................full-time equivalent FTP ............................................full-time permanent FY ..............................................fiscal year Funding Corporation ................Federal Farm Credit Banks Funding Corporation GSE ...........................................government-sponsored enterprise IT ...............................................information technology NCB ...........................................National Consumer Cooperative Bank OSMO ........................................Office of Secondary Market Oversight PCA ...........................................production credit association RBC ...........................................risk-based capital USDA ........................................U.S. Department of Agriculture YBS ............................................young, beginning, and small (farmers and ranchers) iv Farm Credit Administration FY 2022 Proposed Budget and Performance Plan Preface The Farm Credit Administration is an independent agency in the executive branch of the U.S. government. We are responsible
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual Information Statement of the Farm Credit System
    2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION STATEMENT OF THE FARM CREDIT SYSTEM Federal Farm Credit Banks Funding Corporation 101 Hudson Street, Suite 3505 • Jersey City, New Jersey 07302 • 201-200-8000 MARCH 1, 2021 This annual information statement provides important information for investors in the debt securities jointly issued by the four Farm Credit System Banks — AgFirst Farm Credit Bank, AgriBank, FCB, CoBank, ACB and Farm Credit Bank of Texas (collectively, the Banks). These debt securities, which we refer to as Systemwide Debt Securities, include: • Federal Farm Credit Banks Consolidated Systemwide Bonds, • Federal Farm Credit Banks Consolidated Systemwide Discount Notes, • Federal Farm Credit Banks Consolidated Systemwide Medium-Term Notes, and • any other debt securities that the Farm Credit System Banks may jointly issue from time to time. This annual information statement does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy Systemwide Debt Securities. Systemwide Debt Securities are offered by the Federal Farm Credit Banks Funding Corporation (Funding Corporation) on behalf of the Banks pursuant to offering circulars for each type of debt offering. The relevant offering circular as of this date is the Federal Farm Credit Banks Consolidated Systemwide Bonds and Discount Notes Offering Circular dated December 8, 2014, as amended by the supplements dated October 2, 2017, September 17, 2018, April 1, 2020, September 23, 2020 and September 24, 2020. The offering circular may be amended or supplemented from time to time and a new offering circular may be issued. Before purchasing Systemwide Debt Securities, you should carefully read the relevant offering circular and related supplements, the most recent annual and quarterly information statements and other current information released by the Funding Corporation regarding the Banks and/or Systemwide Debt Securities.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation
    FINAL REPORT on the Reconstruction Finance Corporation Pursuant to Section 6(c) Reorganization Plan No. 1 of 1957 SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT FKttJTING OFFICE WASHINGTON 1959 For ale by the Superintendent ef Decutacnti, U-S.GovcnracQt Printing Office Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis THC SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY WASHINGTON May 6, 1959 Sirs: I have the honor to submit herewith the final report on the Reconstruction Finance Corporation which is required under Section 6 (c) of Reorganization Plan No* 1 of 1957. The report was prepared under the direction of Mr* Laurence B. Robbing, who presently is serving in the capacity of Assistant Secretary of the Treasury. Prior to confirmation in his present position, Mr. Robbins served both as Deputy Administrator and Administrator of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation and directed the liquidation of that Corporation's affairs. Secretary of the Treasury To the President of the Senate To the-Speaker of the House of Representatives iii Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis FOREWORD The Reconstruction Finance Corporation was among the largest and undoubtedly was the most complex of all Federal lending agen- cies. In its operations it disbursed more than $40 billion, and was conditionally committed to disburse many billions more under guar- anties of loans and investments made by private financial institutions. Organized during a severe economic depression, the RFC passed through periods of recovery, preparedness, war, reconversion, eco- nomic expansion, another war and, finally, stability and prosperity.
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-16-175, Financial Regulation
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters February 2016 FINANCIAL REGULATION Complex and Fragmented Structure Could Be Streamlined to Improve Effectiveness GAO-16-175 February 2016 FINANCIAL REGULATION Complex and Fragmented Structure Could Be Streamlined to Improve Effectiveness Highlights of GAO-16-175, a report to congressional requesters Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found The U.S. financial regulatory structure The U.S. financial regulatory structure is complex, with responsibilities has evolved over the past 150 years in fragmented among multiple agencies that have overlapping authorities. As a response to various financial crises result, financial entities may fall under the regulatory authority of multiple and the need to keep pace with regulators depending on the types of activities in which they engage (see figure developments in financial markets and on next page). While the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer products in recent decades. Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act) made a number of reforms to the financial GAO was asked to review the financial regulatory system, it generally left the regulatory structure unchanged. regulatory structure and any related impacts of fragmentation or overlap. U.S. regulators and others have noted that the structure has contributed to the This report examines the structure of overall growth and stability in the U.S. economy. However, it also has created the financial regulatory system and the challenges to effective oversight. Fragmentation and overlap have created effects of fragmentation and overlap on inefficiencies in regulatory processes, inconsistencies in how regulators oversee regulators’ oversight activities. GAO similar types of institutions, and differences in the levels of protection afforded to reviewed relevant laws and agency consumers.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Farm Loan Bureau
    U. S. TREASURY DEPARTMENT FEDERAL FARM LOAN BUREAU Circular No. 20 THE FEDERAL FARM LOAN ACT AS AMENDED TO JULY 16, 1932 Exclusive of Provisions relating to Federal Intermediate Credit Banks Appendix, containing certain other Acts of the Congress having a direct relation to the Federal Farm Loan Act INDEX ISSUED BY THE FEDERAL FARM LOAN BOARD JULY, 1932 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1932 Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis EDITORIAL NOTE This circular contains all provisions of the Federal Farm Loan Act and amendments thereto relating to Federal land banks, joint stock land banks, and national farm loan associations in effect on July 16, 1932. The provisions of the act have been classified in accordance with the codification thereof in title 12 of the official Code of Laws of the United States of America in Force December 26, 1926, and supplements thereto. In the left margin of this circular opposite each provision is printed the section number of such provision in title 12 of the Code. In the right margin is printed the number of the section of the Federal Farm Loan Act, as amended, of which the pro­ vision is a part. At the end of each provision is a parenthetical reference to the act of Congress from which the provision was derived and to any subsequent amendatory acts. The symbol “ 12 U. S. C.” refers to United States Code, title 12. The symbol “ F. F. L. Act” refers to the Federal Farm Loan Act, as amended. The official Code has been followed in its editing of the text of the act and amendments thereto, by the omission of “ that55 at the opening of paragraphs, the omission of obsolete provisions, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • DOJ Classifications for Webpage
    Department of Justice Litigation Case File Classifications The first segment of any Department of Justice litigation case file designation is a numerical identifier indicating the kind of offense the Department was investigating when it opened the file. This number is known as the classification. DOJ Classifications 1 Insecticide, Fungicide, and Hazardous Substances 2 Plant Quarantine Act 3 Weeks Forestry Act 4 Prison Matters 5 Tax: Income and Inheritance 6 Stamping Act 7 Virus Act 8 Migratory Bird Act 9 European War Matters (World War I) 10 Red Cross 11 War Tax: Amusement and Cigarette 12 Narcotic Act 13 National Defense Act 14 Cotton Future Act 15 Theft from Interstate Commerce 16 Strikes 17 War Risk Insurance 18 Standard Container Act 19 Opinions of the Attorney General 20 Standard Grain Act 21 Food and Drug (Prosecution) 22 Food and Drug (Seizure) 23 Liquor Violations 24 High Cost of Living 25 Selective Service Act 26 Dyer Act (Automobile Theft) 27 Patents 28 Copyrights 29 National Banking Act 30 Quarantine 31 White Slave Traffic (Mann Act) 32 Federal Building Space 33 Federal Building Sites 34 Lacy Act (Game) 35 Civil Service Act 36 Mail Fraud 37 Bonus Overpayment, World War I 38 Naturalization 39 Immigration 40 Passport and Visa Matters 41 Explosives 42 Desertion from Armed Forces of U.S., Harboring such Deserters 43 Illegal Wearing of Uniform 44 Department of Justice Administrative Files (Closed) 45 Crime on the High Seas 46 Fraud Against the Government 47 Impersonation of Federal Officer 48 Postal Violations 49 Bankruptcy 50 Peonage
    [Show full text]
  • CRS Report for Congress Received Through the CRS Web
    Order Code 97-905 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Agriculture: A Glossary of Terms, Programs, and Laws, 2005 Edition Updated June 16, 2005 Jasper Womach, Coordinator Agricultural Policy Specialist Resources, Science, and Industry Division Congressional Research Service ô The Library of Congress The coordinator and a principal contributor to this glossary is Jasper Womach. Additional CRS contributors to this and previous editions in alphabetical order are: Geoffrey S. Becker; John Blodgett; Gene Buck; Carol Canada; Ralph Chite; Betsy Cody; Claudia Copeland; Lynne Corn; Tadlock Cowan; Bruce Foote; Ross Gorte; Charles Hanrahan; Remy Jurenas; Sarah Lister, Jim McCarthy; Jim Monke, Donna Porter; Jean M. Rawson; Mark Reisch; Joe Richardson; Linda Schierow; Randy Schnepf, Mary Tiemann; Donna Vogt; Brent Yacobucci; Jeffrey Zinn. [06102005] Suggestions and comments can be sent to [email protected]. Agriculture: A Glossary of Terms, Programs, and Laws, 2005 Edition Summary Note: a searchable Web version of this product is available. It may contain more recent changes than the printed version, which is updated less frequently. The URL is [http://www.congress.gov/erp/lists/agglossary.html]. The complexities of federal farm and food programs have generated a unique vocabulary. Common understanding of these terms (new and old) is important to those involved in policymaking in this area. For this reason, the House Agriculture Committee requested that CRS prepare a glossary of agriculture and related terms (e.g., food programs, conservation, forestry, environmental protection, etc.). Besides defining terms and phrases with specialized meanings for agriculture, the glossary also identifies acronyms, abbreviations, agencies, programs, and laws related to agriculture that are of particular interest to the staff and Members of Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Or Quarterly Information Statement
    SECOND QUARTER 2021 QUARTERLY INFORMATION STATEMENT OF THE FARM CREDIT SYSTEM Federal Farm Credit Banks Funding Corporation 101 Hudson Street, Suite 3505 • Jersey City, New Jersey 07302 • 201-200-8000 AUGUST 6, 2021 This quarterly information statement provides important information for investors in the debt securities jointly issued by the four Farm Credit System Banks — AgFirst Farm Credit Bank, AgriBank, FCB, CoBank, ACB and Farm Credit Bank of Texas (collectively, the Banks). These debt securities, which we refer to as Systemwide Debt Securities, include: • Federal Farm Credit Banks Consolidated Systemwide Bonds, • Federal Farm Credit Banks Consolidated Systemwide Discount Notes, • Federal Farm Credit Banks Consolidated Systemwide Medium-Term Notes, and • any other debt securities that the Farm Credit System Banks may jointly issue from time to time. This quarterly information statement does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy Systemwide Debt Securities. Systemwide Debt Securities are offered by the Federal Farm Credit Banks Funding Corporation (Funding Corporation) on behalf of the Banks pursuant to offering circulars for each type of debt offering. The relevant offering circular as of this date is the Federal Farm Credit Banks Consolidated Systemwide Bonds and Discount Notes Offering Circular dated December 8, 2014, as amended by the supplements dated October 2, 2017, September 17, 2018, April 1, 2020, September 23, 2020 and September 24, 2020. The offering circular may be amended or supplemented from time to time and a new offering circular may be issued. Before purchasing Systemwide Debt Securities, you should carefully read the relevant offering circular and related supplements, the most recent annual and quarterly information statements and other current information released by the Funding Corporation regarding the Banks and/or Systemwide Debt Securities.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Services and Cybersecurity: the Federal Role
    Financial Services and Cybersecurity: The Federal Role Updated March 23, 2016 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R44429 Financial Services and Cybersecurity: The Federal Role Summary Multiple federal and state regulators oversee companies in the financial services industry. Regulatory authority is often directed at particular functions or financial services activities rather than at particular entities or companies. It is, therefore, likely that a financial services company with multiple product lines—deposits, securities, insurance—will find that it must answer to different regulators with respect to particular aspects of its operations. Five federal agencies oversee depository institutions, two regulate securities, several agencies have discrete authority over various segments of the financial sector, and several self-regulatory organizations monitor entities in the securities business. Federal banking regulators (the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Reserve, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) are required to promulgate safety and soundness standards for all federally insured depository institutions to protect the stability of the nation’s banking system. Some of these standards pertain to cybersecurity issues, including information security, data breaches, and destruction or theft of business records. The federal securities regulators (the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission) have asserted authority over various aspects of cybersecurity in securities markets and those who trade in them. This includes requiring publicly traded financial and nonfinancial corporations to file annual and quarterly reports that provide investors with material information, a category which could include information about cybersecurity risks or breaches. In addition, overseeing the securities industry are certain self-regulatory organizations—private organizations empowered by law or regulation to create and enforce industry rules, including those covering cybersecurity.
    [Show full text]
  • Consolidation in the Farm Credit System: the Case of Agcountry and United Erik D Hanson North Dakota State University
    Case Study Consolidation in the Farm Credit System: The Case of AgCountry and United Erik D Hanson North Dakota State University JEL Codes: Q13, Q14 Keywords: Agricultural finance, agricultural lending, consolidation, Farm Credit System, merger Abstract Agricultural lenders provide an important service in America’s agricultural economy. In recent years, consolidation has occurred in many aspects of agriculture, including agricultural lending. This educational case study examines consolidation in the Farm Credit System (FCS), which is a system of cooperatively owned agricultural lending associations. The merger between AgCountry Farm Credit Services and United FCS illustrates some drivers of consolidation in the Farm Credit System and provides opportunities to consider the advantages and disadvantages of a merger. The perspectives of the associations’ leaders, member-owners, and employees are explored, allowing students to offer tactical and strategic advice to these stakeholders. This case study is intended for undergraduate students taking courses in agricultural finance, agricultural lending, or cooperatives. 1 Introduction In fall 2016, farmers across the upper Midwest were busy harvesting their crops and preparing for the next growing season. At the same time, leaders at AgCountry Farm Credit Services and United FCS were also reflecting on past efforts and planning for the future. Bob Bahl, the chief executive officer (CEO) of AgCountry, and Marc Knisely, the CEO of United, had identified and evaluated strategic opportunities throughout their careers in the Farm Credit System (FCS). Now they were considering another key question: whether AgCountry and United should become a single association. If a merger were to occur, the new association would conduct business with approximately 18,000 borrowers in 65 counties in eastern North Dakota, western Minnesota, and north central Wisconsin (Vinje 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record-House House of Representatives
    ,1933 _CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-HOUSE 4681 as I am concerned, I should be very glad if we could fix a NOMINATIONS time definitely for a vote tomorrow on the nomination. Executive nominations received by the Senate May 31 (legis­ Mr. McNARY. Let me suggest to the Senator that we lative day of Mdy 29), 1933 recess at this time until 11 o'clock tomorrow, in executive session, and vote upon the confirmation of the nominee to­ SECRETARIES IN THE DIPLOMATIC SERVICE morrow at 3 o'clock. William F. Cavenaugh, of California, now a Foreign Mr. BARKLEY. Mr. President, I am anxious to have this Service officer, unclassified, and a vice consul of career, to be case disposed of; but if several Senators on the other side also a secretary in the Diplomatic Service of the United are to speak, as indicated by the Senator from Mississippi, States of America. and they are to take all the time until 3 o'clock, and then we Bernard Gufler, of Washington, now a Foreign Service are to vote, I could not enter into any such agreement. I officer, unclassified, and a vice consul of career, to be also want at least time enough to reply to this stuff being dumped a secretary in the Diplomatic Service of the United States into the RECORD. of America. Mr. CLARK. I desire to make a few remarks myself. Louis G. Dreyfus, Jr., of California, now a Foreign Service Mr. HARRISON. Mr. President, would the Senator from officer of class 1 and a consul general, to be also a secretary Oregon be willing that we recess until 11 o'clock, and that in the Diplomatic Service of the United States of America.
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture: a Glossary of Terms, Programs, and Laws 2Nd Edition
    97-905 ENR Agriculture: A Glossary of Terms, Programs, and Laws 2nd Edition June 8, 1999 Jasper Womach, Coordinator Agricultural Policy Specialist Resources, Science, and Industry Division *97-905* Principal CRS contributors to this glossary are: Jasper Womach; Geoffrey S. Becker; John Blodgett; Jean Yavis Jones; Remy Jurenas; Ralph Chite; and, Paul Rockwell. Other CRS contributors are: Eugene Boyd; Lynne Corn; Betsy Cody; Claudia Copeland; Diane Duffy; Bruce Foote; Ross Gorte; Charles Hanrahan; Martin R. Lee; Donna Porter; Jean M. Rawson; Joe Richardson; Jack Taylor; Linda Schierow; Mary Tiemann; Donna Vogt; and Jeffrey Zinn. Jasper Womach is responsible for coordination and editing of the original publication. Carol Canada coordinated and edited the second edition. Because the industry, federal programs, policy issues, and the law are continuously changing, this glossary will be updated in the future. Agriculture: A Glossary of Terms, Programs, and Laws Summary The complexities of federal farm and food programs have generated a unique vocabulary. Common understanding of these terms (new and old) is important to those involved in policymaking in this area. For this reason, the House Agriculture Committee requested that CRS prepare a glossary of agriculture and related terms (e.g., food programs, conservation, forestry, environmental protection, etc.). Besides defining terms and phrases with specialized meanings for agriculture, the glossary also identifies acronyms, agencies, programs, and laws related to agriculture that are of particular interest to the staff and Members of Congress. CRS is releasing it for general congressional use with the permission of the Committee. The approximately 1,900 items selected for inclusion in this glossary were determined in large part by Committee instructions concerning their needs, and by the informed judgment of numerous CRS experts.
    [Show full text]
  • Farm Credit Administration 1501 Farm Credit Drive Mclean, Virginia 22102-5090 (703) 883-4000
    Farm Credit Administration 1501 Farm Credit Drive McLean, Virginia 22102-5090 (703) 883-4000 November 26, 2008 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation [email protected] Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary Attention: Comments/Legal 550 17th Street, NW Washington, DC 20429 Subject: Minimum Capital Ratios; Capital Adequacy Guidelines; Capital Maintenance; Capital: Treatment of Certain Claims on, or Guaranteed by, the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) – RIN 3064-AD34 Dear Mr. Feldman: The Farm Credit Administration (FCA or Agency) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the Office of Thrift Supervision’s (collectively, the agencies) joint notice of proposed rulemaking1 to adopt a 10-percent risk weight for claims on, and the portions of claims guaranteed by, Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. Background The FCA is an independent financial regulatory agency in the executive branch of the U.S. Government. Initially created by an Executive order of the President in 1933, the Agency now derives its powers and authorities from the Farm Credit Act of 1971, as amended (Farm Credit Act).2 The FCA examines and regulates3 the Farm Credit System (FCS or System), a government-sponsored enterprise (GSE), to ensure compliance with the Farm Credit Act, regulations, and safe and sound banking practices. The FCA also examines and regulates the Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (Farmer Mac), which provides a secondary market for agricultural real 1 73 Fed. Reg. 63656 (October 27, 2008).
    [Show full text]