DOCSLIB.ORG

CRS Report for Congress Received Through the CRS Web

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CRS Report for Congress Received Through the CRS Web Order Code 97-905 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Agriculture: A Glossary of Terms, Programs, and Laws, 2005 Edition Updated June 16, 2005 Jasper Womach, Coordinator Agricultural Policy Specialist Resources, Science, and Industry Division Congressional Research Service ô The Library of Congress The coordinator and a principal contributor to this glossary is Jasper Womach. Additional CRS contributors to this and previous editions in alphabetical order are: Geoffrey S. Becker; John Blodgett; Gene Buck; Carol Canada; Ralph Chite; Betsy Cody; Claudia Copeland; Lynne Corn; Tadlock Cowan; Bruce Foote; Ross Gorte; Charles Hanrahan; Remy Jurenas; Sarah Lister, Jim McCarthy; Jim Monke, Donna Porter; Jean M. Rawson; Mark Reisch; Joe Richardson; Linda Schierow; Randy Schnepf, Mary Tiemann; Donna Vogt; Brent Yacobucci; Jeffrey Zinn. [06102005] Suggestions and comments can be sent to [email protected]. Agriculture: A Glossary of Terms, Programs, and Laws, 2005 Edition Summary Note: a searchable Web version of this product is available. It may contain more recent changes than the printed version, which is updated less frequently. The URL is [http://www.congress.gov/erp/lists/agglossary.html]. The complexities of federal farm and food programs have generated a unique vocabulary. Common understanding of these terms (new and old) is important to those involved in policymaking in this area. For this reason, the House Agriculture Committee requested that CRS prepare a glossary of agriculture and related terms (e.g., food programs, conservation, forestry, environmental protection, etc.). Besides defining terms and phrases with specialized meanings for agriculture, the glossary also identifies acronyms, abbreviations, agencies, programs, and laws related to agriculture that are of particular interest to the staff and Members of Congress. CRS is releasing it for general congressional use with the permission of the Committee. The approximately 2,500 entries in this glossary were selected in large part on the basis of Committee instructions and the informed judgment of numerous CRS experts. Time and resource constraints influenced how much and what was included. Many of the glossary explanations have been drawn from other published sources, including previous CRS glossaries, those published by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and other federal agencies, and glossaries contained in the publications of various organizations, universities, and authors. In collecting these definitions, the compilers discovered that many terms have diverse specialized meanings in different professional settings. In this glossary, the definitions or explanations have been written to reflect their relevance to agriculture and recent changes in farm and food policies. This glossary is in alphabetical order and contains an explanation for each term. Acronyms and abbreviations are not followed by an explanation. However, except for private organizations and associations, the abbreviations likely are defined under their full name. The definitions and explanations are not legal in nature, but are explanatory. Hence, this document should not be used as a legal or administrative reference. For those purposes, the Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, and the Code of Federal Regulations are the more appropriate resources. Agriculture: A Glossary of Terms, Programs, and Laws, 2005 Edition AAEA — American Agricultural Economics Association. [www.aaea.org]. AAFCO — American Association of Feed Control Officials. [www.aafco.org]. AAM — American Agriculture Movement. [www.aaminc.org]. AAMP — American Association of Meat Processors. [www.aamp.com]. AAR — Association of American Railroads. [www.aar.org]. AARCC — Alternative Agriculture Research and Commercialization Corporation. Aarhus Protocol on Persistent Organic Pollutants — This 1998 protocol on persistent organic pollutants (POPs) is an addition to the 1979 Geneva Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP). The Aarhus POPs Protocol seeks “to control, reduce or eliminate discharge, emissions and losses of persistent organic pollutants” in Europe, some former Soviet Union countries, and the United States. The protocol is an executive agreement that does not require Senate approval. However, legislation is needed to resolve inconsistencies between provisions of the protocol and existing U.S. laws ( specifically the Toxic Substances Control Act and the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act). ABA — American Bakers Association. [www.americanbakers.org]. American Bankers Association. [www.aba.com/default.htm]. American Bar Association. [www.abanet.org]. Abandoned wells — Abandoned drainage wells and abandoned water wells on vacant farmsteads are of particular concern for agriculture. Abandoned wells can present both safety risks and a direct conduit by which groundwater can be contaminated by surface runoff. A number of states have incentive and/or regulatory programs to cap or seal abandoned wells. Able-bodied Adults Without Dependents (ABAWDs) — This term refers to low income working adults who do not have dependents. The 1996 welfare law (P.L. 104-193) set categorical requirements for food stamp participation. Among these were restrictions on legal alien participation and participation by low income persons without dependents. The latter (formerly eligible based solely on low income) were made ineligible for food stamps if they received food stamps for 3 months during the preceding 3 years without working or participating in a work program for at least 20 hours a week, or without participating in a workfare program. ACA — Agricultural Credit Association. ACE — Agriculture in Concert with the Environment. CRS-2 Acid deposition / acid rain — Abnormally acidic (low pH) precipitation (or dry deposition) resulting from emissions of sulfur and nitrogen compounds that transform during chemical processes in the atmosphere. Acid deposition can affect the chemistry of soils and acidify lakes, adversely affecting forests and fish. It may adversely affect cropland. The Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.) includes a program focused on controlling precursor emissions of acid deposition, primarily sulfur oxides from coal-fired electric utilities. ACP Countries — African, Caribbean and Pacific countries are former European colonies associated with the European Union under the Cotonou Agreement negotiated in 2000. EU- ACP relations were formerly covered by the Lome Convention. ACP countries benefit from development assistance and trade preferences provided under the Cotonou Agreement. ACPA — American Crop Protection Association changed its name to CropLife America. [www.croplifeamerica.org]. Acquired lands — Lands in federal ownership that were obtained by the federal government through purchase, condemnation, gift, or exchange. One category of public lands. ACR — Acreage conservation reserve. Acre — 1 acre = 43,560 sq. ft. = 208.71 ft.2 = 0.405 hectares. Note that 640 acres = 1 sq. mile (called a “section”). Acre-foot — The volume of water that would cover one acre of land (43,560 square feet) to a depth of one foot, equivalent to 325,851 gallons of water. An acre-foot is the basic measure of agricultural water use. On average, irrigators apply almost 2 feet of water on each acre through the crop growing season; the amount ranges from 4 feet in the Southwest to a half foot in some eastern states, and varies, depending on the crop grown. Water withdrawn for irrigation from ground and surface sources totals about 150 maf (million acre- feet) of water annually. Acreage allotment — Under provisions of permanent commodity price support law, a farm’s acreage allotment is its share, based on its previous production, of the national acreage needed to produce sufficient supplies of a particular crop. Under the 2002 farm bill (P.L. 101-171, Title I), acreage allotments are not applicable to the covered commodities, peanuts, or sugar. Subsequently, allotments and quotas and price support for tobacco were eliminated beginning in 2005 (P.L. 108-357, Title VI). Acreage conservation reserve — The cropland acreage diverted from production under the acreage reduction program authorized prior to 1996. Acreage diversion programs — Historically, commodity programs included provisions to reduce commodity supplies by diverting acreage to non-crop uses. Examples include paid diversion, unpaid diversion, set-aside, and acreage reduction programs. The 1996 farm bill (P.L. 104-127) eliminated authority for the USDA to implement annual acreage reduction programs. The Conservation Reserve Program pays farmers for the long-term conversion of fragile cropland land to conserving uses and is not considered to be an acreage diversion program. Acreage limitation — With respect to commodity policy, acreage limitation might refer to planting constraints under an acreage reduction program, set-aside, or paid land diversion. These programs are no longer authorized. In relation to water policy, it is the maximum number of acres that may be irrigated with less than full-cost water from Bureau of CRS-3 Reclamation projects. Generally, the acreage limitation for individuals or legal entities representing 25 people or fewer is 960 acres; however, amounts vary depending on a landowner’s legal status. Also referred to as ownership limitation, ownership entitlement, or non-full-cost entitlement. Acreage Reduction Program (ARP) — A no-longer- authorized annual cropland retirement program for wheat, feed grains, cotton, or rice in which farmers
Load more

Recommended publications
  • History of Agricultural Price-Support and Adjustment Programs, 1933-84
    legislation covered the 1953 and 1954 crops of basic commodities if the producers had not disapproved marketing quotas and also extended, through 1955, the requirement that the effective parity price for the basic commodities should be the parity price computed under the new or the old formula, whichever was higher. Extra-long staple cotton was made a basic commodity for price support purposes. TOWARD FLEXIBLE PRICE SUPPORTS At the end of the Korean War in 1953, the specter of surpluses once again dominated agricultural policymaking. The debate over levels of support (high and fixed versus a flexible scale) was renewed. The administration of Secretary Ezra Taft Benson increasingly favored flexible supports which would drop as supplies increased. Most Congressmen from agricultural districts, on the other hand, wanted to continue fixed supports. A growing number of agricultural economists moved from their near unanimous preference for flexible supports in the late 1940s to a belief that only strong production controls and high price supports could assure acceptable farm income in a period of growing productivity. For the immediate postwar period, USDA commodity programs continued much as before. Support levels for basic crops remained at 90 percent of parity for 1953 and 1954. Secretary Benson proclaimed marketing quotas for the 1954 wheat and cotton crops on June 1, 1953, and October 9, 1953, respectively. The major types of tobacco and peanuts continued under marketing quotas. Quotas were not imposed on corn but corn acreage allotments were reinstated in 1954 for the first time since before World War II (with the brief exception of 1950).
    [Show full text]
  • 56392 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 216 / Wednesday, November 8, 1995 / Rules and Regulations
    56392 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 216 / Wednesday, November 8, 1995 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE result of comments that were made, omitted. This authority formerly was revisions were made in the following exercised by the Assistant Secretary for Office of the Secretary sections: Administration. Section 2.7. The term ``administrative Section 2.42(a)(28)(i). This paragraph 7 CFR Part 2 rules and regulations'' is changed to is revised to parallel the revision made ``administrative directives'' to clarify to section 2.16(a)(2)(i)(A). The proposal Revision of Delegations of Authority that the authority delegated is to be exercised in accordance with applicable excepts from the authority delegated to AGENCY: Department of Agriculture. the Administrator, Farm Service ACTION: Final rule. internal directives. The term ``in this part or elsewhere'' is changed to ``in this Agency, the authority to administer SUMMARY: This document revises the part'' to clarify that agency heads section 303(a) (2) and (3) of the Con Act, delegations of authority from the delegated authority in this regulation relating to real estate loans for Secretary of Agriculture and general report to a general officer. recreation and non-farm purposes. It has officers of the Department due to a Section 2.16(a)(2)(i)(A). The proposal been determined that the authority to reorganization. excepts from the authority delegated to administer section 303(a) (2) and (3) of EFFECTIVE DATE: November 8, 1995. the Under Secretary for Farm and the Con Act should have been included in the Administrator's delegation. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Foreign Agricultural Services, the Accordingly, the provision is deleted Robert L.
    [Show full text]
  • Report No. 82-156 Gov Major Acts of Congress And
    REPORT NO. 82-156 GOV MAJOR ACTS OF CONGRESS AND TREATIES APPROVED BY THE SENATE 1789-1980 Christopher Dell Stephen W. Stathis Analysts in American National Governent Government Division September 1982 CONmGHnItNA^l JK 1000 B RE filmH C SE HVICA^^ ABSTRACT During the nearly two centuries since the framing of the Constitution, more than 41,000 public bills have been approved by Congress, submitted to the President for his approval and become law. The seven hundred or so acts summarized in this compilation represent the major acts approved by Congress in its efforts to determine national policies to be carried out by the executive branch, to authorize appropriations to carry out these policies, and to fulfill its responsibility of assuring that such actions are being carried out in accordance with congressional intent. Also included are those treaties considered to be of similar importance. An extensive index allows each entry in this work to be located with relative ease. The authors wish to credit Daphine Lee, Larry Nunley, and Lenora Pruitt for the secretarial production of this report. CONTENTS ABSTRACT.................................................................. 111 CONGRESSES: 1st (March 4, 1789-March 3, 1791)..................................... 3 2nd (October 24, 1791-March 2, 1793)................................... 7 3rd (December 2, 1793-March 3, 1795).................................. 8 4th (December 7, 1795-March 3, 1797).................................. 9 5th (May 15, 1797-March 3, 1799)....................................... 11 6th (December 2, 1799-March 3, 1801)................................... 13 7th (December 7, 1801-Marh 3, 1803)................................... 14 8th (October 17, 1803-March 3, 1805)....... ........................... 15 9th (December 2, 1805-March 3, 1807)................................... 16 10th (October 26, 1807-March 3, 1809)..................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Information Statement of the Farm Credit System
    2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION STATEMENT OF THE FARM CREDIT SYSTEM Federal Farm Credit Banks Funding Corporation 101 Hudson Street, Suite 3505 • Jersey City, New Jersey 07302 • 201-200-8000 MARCH 1, 2021 This annual information statement provides important information for investors in the debt securities jointly issued by the four Farm Credit System Banks — AgFirst Farm Credit Bank, AgriBank, FCB, CoBank, ACB and Farm Credit Bank of Texas (collectively, the Banks). These debt securities, which we refer to as Systemwide Debt Securities, include: • Federal Farm Credit Banks Consolidated Systemwide Bonds, • Federal Farm Credit Banks Consolidated Systemwide Discount Notes, • Federal Farm Credit Banks Consolidated Systemwide Medium-Term Notes, and • any other debt securities that the Farm Credit System Banks may jointly issue from time to time. This annual information statement does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy Systemwide Debt Securities. Systemwide Debt Securities are offered by the Federal Farm Credit Banks Funding Corporation (Funding Corporation) on behalf of the Banks pursuant to offering circulars for each type of debt offering. The relevant offering circular as of this date is the Federal Farm Credit Banks Consolidated Systemwide Bonds and Discount Notes Offering Circular dated December 8, 2014, as amended by the supplements dated October 2, 2017, September 17, 2018, April 1, 2020, September 23, 2020 and September 24, 2020. The offering circular may be amended or supplemented from time to time and a new offering circular may be issued. Before purchasing Systemwide Debt Securities, you should carefully read the relevant offering circular and related supplements, the most recent annual and quarterly information statements and other current information released by the Funding Corporation regarding the Banks and/or Systemwide Debt Securities.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 110–246 110Th Congress An
    PUBLIC LAW 110–246—JUNE 18, 2008 122 STAT. 1651 Public Law 110–246 110th Congress An Act To provide for the continuation of agricultural and other programs of the Department June 18, 2008 of Agriculture through fiscal year 2012, and for other purposes. [H.R. 6124] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, Food, Conservation, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. and Energy Act HORT ITLE of 2008. (a) S T .—This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Food, Con- 7 USC 8701 note. servation, and Energy Act of 2008’’. (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents of this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. Sec. 2. Definition of Secretary. Sec. 3. Explanatory Statement. Sec. 4. Repeal of duplicative enactment. TITLE I—COMMODITY PROGRAMS Sec. 1001. Definitions. Subtitle A—Direct Payments and Counter-Cyclical Payments Sec. 1101. Base acres. Sec. 1102. Payment yields. Sec. 1103. Availability of direct payments. Sec. 1104. Availability of counter-cyclical payments. Sec. 1105. Average crop revenue election program. Sec. 1106. Producer agreement required as condition of provision of payments. Sec. 1107. Planting flexibility. Sec. 1108. Special rule for long grain and medium grain rice. Sec. 1109. Period of effectiveness. Subtitle B—Marketing Assistance Loans and Loan Deficiency Payments Sec. 1201. Availability of nonrecourse marketing assistance loans for loan commod- ities. Sec. 1202. Loan rates for nonrecourse marketing assistance loans. Sec. 1203. Term of loans. Sec. 1204. Repayment of loans. Sec. 1205. Loan deficiency payments. Sec.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Or Quarterly Information Statement
    SECOND QUARTER 2021 QUARTERLY INFORMATION STATEMENT OF THE FARM CREDIT SYSTEM Federal Farm Credit Banks Funding Corporation 101 Hudson Street, Suite 3505 • Jersey City, New Jersey 07302 • 201-200-8000 AUGUST 6, 2021 This quarterly information statement provides important information for investors in the debt securities jointly issued by the four Farm Credit System Banks — AgFirst Farm Credit Bank, AgriBank, FCB, CoBank, ACB and Farm Credit Bank of Texas (collectively, the Banks). These debt securities, which we refer to as Systemwide Debt Securities, include: • Federal Farm Credit Banks Consolidated Systemwide Bonds, • Federal Farm Credit Banks Consolidated Systemwide Discount Notes, • Federal Farm Credit Banks Consolidated Systemwide Medium-Term Notes, and • any other debt securities that the Farm Credit System Banks may jointly issue from time to time. This quarterly information statement does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy Systemwide Debt Securities. Systemwide Debt Securities are offered by the Federal Farm Credit Banks Funding Corporation (Funding Corporation) on behalf of the Banks pursuant to offering circulars for each type of debt offering. The relevant offering circular as of this date is the Federal Farm Credit Banks Consolidated Systemwide Bonds and Discount Notes Offering Circular dated December 8, 2014, as amended by the supplements dated October 2, 2017, September 17, 2018, April 1, 2020, September 23, 2020 and September 24, 2020. The offering circular may be amended or supplemented from time to time and a new offering circular may be issued. Before purchasing Systemwide Debt Securities, you should carefully read the relevant offering circular and related supplements, the most recent annual and quarterly information statements and other current information released by the Funding Corporation regarding the Banks and/or Systemwide Debt Securities.
    [Show full text]
  • Consolidation in the Farm Credit System: the Case of Agcountry and United Erik D Hanson North Dakota State University
    Case Study Consolidation in the Farm Credit System: The Case of AgCountry and United Erik D Hanson North Dakota State University JEL Codes: Q13, Q14 Keywords: Agricultural finance, agricultural lending, consolidation, Farm Credit System, merger Abstract Agricultural lenders provide an important service in America’s agricultural economy. In recent years, consolidation has occurred in many aspects of agriculture, including agricultural lending. This educational case study examines consolidation in the Farm Credit System (FCS), which is a system of cooperatively owned agricultural lending associations. The merger between AgCountry Farm Credit Services and United FCS illustrates some drivers of consolidation in the Farm Credit System and provides opportunities to consider the advantages and disadvantages of a merger. The perspectives of the associations’ leaders, member-owners, and employees are explored, allowing students to offer tactical and strategic advice to these stakeholders. This case study is intended for undergraduate students taking courses in agricultural finance, agricultural lending, or cooperatives. 1 Introduction In fall 2016, farmers across the upper Midwest were busy harvesting their crops and preparing for the next growing season. At the same time, leaders at AgCountry Farm Credit Services and United FCS were also reflecting on past efforts and planning for the future. Bob Bahl, the chief executive officer (CEO) of AgCountry, and Marc Knisely, the CEO of United, had identified and evaluated strategic opportunities throughout their careers in the Farm Credit System (FCS). Now they were considering another key question: whether AgCountry and United should become a single association. If a merger were to occur, the new association would conduct business with approximately 18,000 borrowers in 65 counties in eastern North Dakota, western Minnesota, and north central Wisconsin (Vinje 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture: a Glossary of Terms, Programs, and Laws 2Nd Edition
    97-905 ENR Agriculture: A Glossary of Terms, Programs, and Laws 2nd Edition June 8, 1999 Jasper Womach, Coordinator Agricultural Policy Specialist Resources, Science, and Industry Division *97-905* Principal CRS contributors to this glossary are: Jasper Womach; Geoffrey S. Becker; John Blodgett; Jean Yavis Jones; Remy Jurenas; Ralph Chite; and, Paul Rockwell. Other CRS contributors are: Eugene Boyd; Lynne Corn; Betsy Cody; Claudia Copeland; Diane Duffy; Bruce Foote; Ross Gorte; Charles Hanrahan; Martin R. Lee; Donna Porter; Jean M. Rawson; Joe Richardson; Jack Taylor; Linda Schierow; Mary Tiemann; Donna Vogt; and Jeffrey Zinn. Jasper Womach is responsible for coordination and editing of the original publication. Carol Canada coordinated and edited the second edition. Because the industry, federal programs, policy issues, and the law are continuously changing, this glossary will be updated in the future. Agriculture: A Glossary of Terms, Programs, and Laws Summary The complexities of federal farm and food programs have generated a unique vocabulary. Common understanding of these terms (new and old) is important to those involved in policymaking in this area. For this reason, the House Agriculture Committee requested that CRS prepare a glossary of agriculture and related terms (e.g., food programs, conservation, forestry, environmental protection, etc.). Besides defining terms and phrases with specialized meanings for agriculture, the glossary also identifies acronyms, agencies, programs, and laws related to agriculture that are of particular interest to the staff and Members of Congress. CRS is releasing it for general congressional use with the permission of the Committee. The approximately 1,900 items selected for inclusion in this glossary were determined in large part by Committee instructions concerning their needs, and by the informed judgment of numerous CRS experts.
    [Show full text]
  • C§Jlletin3~ Esm 45
    C§JLLETIN3~ ESM 45 COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE I THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY Even though farm numbers continue to decline rapidly, increasing production from the remaining farms more than adequately supplies the food and fiber needs of our in­ creasing population. Since farm incomes are lower than the incomes of non-farm workers, cooperative and legislative attempts have been made to improve the farmer's economic position and increase SUMMARY society's standard of living. Farm income from all sources on a per person basis now is about 80 percent that of non-farm people--an improvement over the 50 percent level of 1959. Legislators have provided various programs--price supports (either directly or through surplus purchases and storage), agricultural credit, production controls on acreage and marketings, the s01l bank, and more recently the voluntary partial land retirement programs (feed grains, cotton, wheat)--to impro\e low farm incomes. Wars, depression, diseases, droughts and changes in the Ame rica11 diet ha\e all contributed to a shifting of emphasis concerning farm needs and legislatiYe action. Changes in the future will continue to spur new programs aimed at improving conditions for agriculture and its contribution to our total welfare. CONTENTS Farm Problems. • . 3 Obfective s •........... , ...............•......................... , ..... , . • • 4 Early Agricultural Policy.............. • . • . 4 Education and Research. • . • . 5 Farm Organization and the Cooperative Movement.............. • . • . • . • 5 Credit Smted to Farmers'
    [Show full text]
  • Farm Credit Administration 1501 Farm Credit Drive Mclean, Virginia 22102-5090 (703) 883-4000
    Farm Credit Administration 1501 Farm Credit Drive McLean, Virginia 22102-5090 (703) 883-4000 November 26, 2008 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation [email protected] Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary Attention: Comments/Legal 550 17th Street, NW Washington, DC 20429 Subject: Minimum Capital Ratios; Capital Adequacy Guidelines; Capital Maintenance; Capital: Treatment of Certain Claims on, or Guaranteed by, the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) – RIN 3064-AD34 Dear Mr. Feldman: The Farm Credit Administration (FCA or Agency) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the Office of Thrift Supervision’s (collectively, the agencies) joint notice of proposed rulemaking1 to adopt a 10-percent risk weight for claims on, and the portions of claims guaranteed by, Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. Background The FCA is an independent financial regulatory agency in the executive branch of the U.S. Government. Initially created by an Executive order of the President in 1933, the Agency now derives its powers and authorities from the Farm Credit Act of 1971, as amended (Farm Credit Act).2 The FCA examines and regulates3 the Farm Credit System (FCS or System), a government-sponsored enterprise (GSE), to ensure compliance with the Farm Credit Act, regulations, and safe and sound banking practices. The FCA also examines and regulates the Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (Farmer Mac), which provides a secondary market for agricultural real 1 73 Fed. Reg. 63656 (October 27, 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Farm Credit Services of America's Deal to Leave the Farm Credit System
    Order Code RS21919 Updated September 24, 2004 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Farm Credit Services of America’s Deal to Leave the Farm Credit System Jim Monke Analyst in Agricultural Policy Resources, Science, and Industry Division Summary In an unprecedented move, an institution of the Farm Credit System (FCS or System) — a government-sponsored enterprise (GSE) — has initiated procedures to terminate its status in the System and be purchased by a private company. On July 30, 2004, the board of directors of Farm Credit Services of America (FCSA) accepted an offer to be purchased by Rabobank for $600 million in borrower-owned stock, and a projected $800 million “exit fee” payable to the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation. FCSA is the System lending association that serves farmers in Iowa, Nebraska, South Dakota, and Wyoming. Rabobank is a private banking company from the Netherlands with extensive lending experience in agriculture. The option to leave the System is allowed by statute under the Farm Credit Act of 1971, as amended, but has been exercised only once, and did not involve an outside purchaser. The acquisition needs to be approved by the Farm Credit Administration, the federal regulator of the Farm Credit System, and by the farmer-borrower shareholders in the four-state region. If approved, the loans, facilities, and employees of FCSA would become part of Rabobank. New charters would need to be issued to allow new or existing FCS associations to begin lending in the four-state region. The approval process could be completed as early as the spring of 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronological Landmarks in American Agriculture (AIB-425)
    A. 2 '/^i> 'è ^¿^ //?^{S United States i)] Department of ^"' Agriculture Chronological Economics Research Service Landmarks In Agriculture Information Bulletin American Number 425 Agriculture It's Easy To Order Another Copy! Just dial 1-800»999"6779. Toll free (in the United States and Canada). An other areas pïease dial 301-725-7937. Ask for Chronological Landmarks in American Agriculture (AIB-425). The cost is $11.00 per copy. For non-U.S. addresses (including Canada), add 25 percent. Charge your purchase to your VISA or MasterCard, or we can bill you. Or send a check or purchase order (made payable to ERS-NASS) to: ERS-NASS P.O. Box 1608 Rockville, MD 20849-1608. We'll fill your order by first-class mail. Revised version, Washington, DC November 1990 CHRONOLOGICAL LANDMARKS IN AMERICAN AGRICULTURE Compiled by Maryanna S. Smith and Dennis M, Roth INTRODUCTION This chronology lists major events in the history of U.S. agriculture. A source to which the reader may turn for additional information on the subject is included with most of the events. Generally, each source appears only once, although it may apply to more than one chronological citation. The reader interested in a particular subject can compile a short bibliography by consulting each citation for that subject. Key inventions, laws, changes in land policies, individuals, contributions, the development of institutions, and the introduction of new types of crops and livestock are included. There are also notes on all commissioners, secretaries of agriculture, and agencies established in response to new programs in the U.S.
    [Show full text]