DOCSLIB.ORG

Occipitalization of Atlas with Other Associated Anomalies of Skull

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Occipitalization of Atlas with Other Associated Anomalies of Skull Eur J Anat, 12 (3): 159-167 (2008) Occipitalization of atlas with other associated anomalies of skull M. Sharma1, B. Singh1, A. Abhaya1 and H. Kumar2 1- Department of Anatomy, Govt. Medical College & Hospital, Chandigarh, India 2- Department of Anatomy, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College, New Delhi, India SUMMARY cephalic). Basal angles were within the normal range (120°-140°). Congenital fusion of the atlas with the occipi- These variations are discussed in light of tal bone is the common denominator of a developmental aspects and their clinical signifi- galaxy of skull defects. Some skull anomalies cance. may result in sudden unexpected death. Seventy dry skulls were obtained from the Key words: Atlas – Foramina transversaria – Department of Anatomy. Of these, 2 skulls Occipitalization – Basal angle showed occipitalization. These were pho- tographed and radiographed. Several measure- INTRODUCTION ments, including cranial index, dimensions of the foramen magnum, basal angle and basal Occipitalization of the atlas is defined as impression, were taken. Both skulls showed congenital bony fusion of the atlas vertebra to near by complete fusion of the atlas with the the base of the occipital bone of the skull. The occipital bone. A continuation of the conflu- incidence of atlanto-occipital fusion ranges ence of the sinuses only to the left transverse from 0.14% to 0.75% of the population, both sinus was observed in both skulls. sexes being equally affected (Lanier, 1939a, b; Al-Motabagani and Surendra, 2006). One skull was asymmetrical in shape. The Occipitalization of the atlas can produce a foramina transversaria of atlas in this specimen wide range of neurological signs and symp- were bilaterally reduced to admit only the toms, which vary from transitory headache to diameter of a safety pin. The thickness of the a full blown neurological syndrome. wall of the other skull was asymmetrical on Cervical cord compression is due to the soft the two sides. It also showed a shelf-like bony tissue and bony abnormalities associated with triangular projection (dural band/ spur), occipitalization of the atlas. This leads to which was attached to the upper margin of the weakness and ataxia of the lower extremities. groove for the transverse sinus on the right Numbness and pain in the upper extremities side. The cranial indices of both the skulls is a prominent complaint. Occipital headache were greater than 80 (brachycranial/brachy- may be present. Correspondence to: Dr Mahesh Sharma. Department of Anatomy, Govt. Medical College & Hospital, Sector-32, Sarai Building, Chandigarh-160030, India. Phone: 0172-2665253-60 ext. Submitted: August 21, 2008 1034, 1032 (office); 0172- 2620180 (residence); Fax: 0172-2609360, 0172-2608488. Accepted: November 14, 2008 E-mail: [email protected] 159 M. Sharma, B. Singh, A. Abhaya and H. Kumar Objective findings chiefly comprise hyper- brief embryological explanation. Knowledge reflexia, positive Babinski and Hoffmann of this rare anatomical variation in the cran- reflexes, weakness and other long-tract signs iovertebral juncture is important for radiolo- in both the upper and lower extremities. gists, neurologists and neurosurgeons. Ataxia may be present to a marked degree, and nystagmus is frequent. Sensory findings are less frequent. MATERIAL AND METHODS Several examples of bony distortion of the foramen magnum were reported by early Seventy human adult skulls from the anatomists. There are two principal types of northwest region of India were studied for evi- congenital anomalies: the first is atlanto-occipital dence of occipitalization of the atlas vertebra. fusion or occipitalization / assimilation of atlas, Each specimen was examined carefully for any first described by Rokitansky in 1844 and associated anatomical variations/anomalies. In demonstrated roentgenographically by Schüller the event of atlas assimilation being detected, in 1911, and second is the manifestation of the degree of fusion between the first cervical occipital vertebra, described by Meckel in 1815 vertebra and occipital bone was examined. and again by Kallman in 1905. Several other Skulls were photographed and X-ray films authors have also reported this bony abnormal- were also obtained in a lateral view. A vernier ity and the neurovascular complications associ- caliper was used for linear measurements. The ated with occipitalization of the atlas following details were noted: (Gladstone and Erichsen, 1915; Green, 1930; – Maximum cranial breadth: the maximum Lanier, 1939a; Mac Rae and Barnum, 1953; breadth taken at a right angle to the mid Misra, 1954; Shehata, 1964; Kalka et al., 1989; sagittal plane. Al-Motabagani and Surendra, 2006). – Maximum cranial length: the linear distance Occipitalization of the atlas is an important between the glabella and opisthocranion. congenital malformation of the cranioverte- – Cranial index = Maximum cranial breadth x 100 bral region because of its proximity to the Maximum cranial length spinomedullary region, with the possibility of – Antero-posterior diameter of the foramen a neurological compression syndrome. It is magnum: the linear distance between the one of the most common skeletal abnormali- basion and opisthion. ties of the upper cervical spine. According to Rowe and Yochum (1987), occipitalization – Antero-posterior length behind the odon- represents the majority of «blocked» cephalic toid process: the linear distance between vertebra encountered in the spine. the opisthion and midpoint taken on an To obtain a diagnosis of morphological imaginary line drawn between the tubercles assimilation of the atlas, it is necessary to to which the transverse ligament of the demonstrate some degree of bony union atlas is attached. between the skull and the atlas (Mac Rae and – Breadth of foramen magnum: the greatest Barnum, 1954). Such assimilation usually transverse breadth of the foramen magnum. involves the anterior arch of the atlas, the lat- – Antero-posterior length of the vertebral eral masses, or the entire atlas. Partial fusion is foramen of the atlas vertebra: the maximum more common. Probable criteria based on the antero-posterior distance in the midline of position of the hypoglossal and suboccipital the vertebral foramen. nerves and the vertebral artery are the most – Maximum breadth of the vertebral foramen reliable for differentiating occipitalization of of the atlas vertebra: the linear distance the atlas from manifestations of an occipital between two points of the vertebral fora- vertebra (third occipital condyles, a para- men of the atlas vertebra on the most later- condyler process, a transverse basioccipital fis- ally placed margins. sure, basilar process, bipartite atlantal facets). – Length at the upper border of the dural Barge demonstrated that the atlanto-occip- spur: the linear distance between the apex ital joint is intersegmental and not segmental and a point at the upper end of the base of (Mac Rae and Barnum, 1953). the spur. The aim of the present study was to deter- – Length at the lower border of the dural mine the prevalence of atlanto-occipital spur: the linear distance between the apex fusions and to describe the skull changes asso- and a point at the lower end of the base of ciated with such an anomaly, along with a the spur. 160 Occipitalization of atlas with other associated anomalies of skull – Length of the base of the dural spur: the lin- Features ear distance between the upper and lower The bilateral presence of a carotido-clinoid ends of the base of the dural spur. foramen was noted (Fig. 1). The thickness of – Basal angle (on X-ray film): measured parietal wall was asymmetrical on both sides. between lines drawn from the tuberculum Thickness was greater on the right side as sellae to the nasofrontal suture and to the compared to the left side. The hypophyseal anterior lip of the foramen magnum on the fossa was shallow. X-ray film. The groove for the left sigmoid sinus was – Basilar impression: a transverse line drawn larger and spacious as compared to the right between the groove for the posterior belly side. The confluence of sinus was continuous of the digastric muscle of one side to the with the left transverse sinus. The groove for same point on the other side. The position the occipital sinus split at the posterior aspect of this line in respect of the atlanto-occipi- of the foramen magnum and joined the groove tal joint or sqamous part of the occipital for the sigmoid sinuses of both sides. bone was noted. If the line lies at or below A bony triangular shelf-like projection, these structures, the basilar impression is whose base was attached between the right present. parietal and sqamous part of the right tempo- – Cranial capacity: cranial capacity was meas- ral bone was seen. This is the dural spur pres- ured using sand: all holes were plugged ent at the upper margin of the attachment of with plasticine and the skull was filled with the tentorium cerebelli (Fig. 1). sand. The sand was then measured volu- metrically. Occipitalization of the Atlas – Atlas: The atlas vertebra was almost completely RESULTS fused with the occipital bone at the base of the Of seventy skulls, only two exhibited the skull, except at the transverse processes on anomaly of occipitalization of the atlas verte- both sides. bra. Both skulls were sexed subjectively using Anterior arch: This part of the atlas was morphological features given in standard text fused with the anterior margin of the foramen books of anatomy, anthropometry and foren- magnum, leaving a single anterior midline sic science (Al-Motabagani and Surendra, (0.4 cm) opening between the anterior tuber- 2006; Singh and Bhasin, 1989; Standring et cle and the basiocciput (Fig. 2). A small circu- al., 2005), showing the skulls probably lar facet of approximately 6-7 mm in belonged to approximately 40-45-year old diameter, located on the posterior surface of males. the anterior arch in the midline for articula- tion with the odontoid process of the axis ver- Skull-I measurements: tebra was seen.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (Frontal Sinus, Coronal Suture) Parietal Bone
    Axial Skeleton Skull (cranium) Frontal Bone (frontal sinus, coronal suture) Parietal Bone (sagittal suture) Sphenoid Bone (sella turcica, sphenoid sinus) Temporal Bone (mastoid process, styloid process, external auditory meatus) malleus incus stapes Occipital Bone (occipital condyles, foramen magnum) Ethmoid Bone (nasal conchae, cribriform plate, crista galli, ethmoid sinus, perpendicular plate) Lacrimal Bone Zygomatic Bone Maxilla Bone (hard palate, palatine process, maxillary sinus) Palatine Bone Nasal Bone Vomer Bone Mandible Hyoid Bone Vertebral Column (general markings: body, vertebral foramen, transverse process, spinous process, superior and inferior articular processes) Cervical Vertebrae (transverse foramina) Atlas (absence of body, "yes" movement) Axis (dens, "no" movement) Thoracic Vertebrae (facets on body and transverse processes) Lumbar Vertebrae (largest) Sacral Vertebrae 5 fused vertebrae) Coccyx (3 to 5 vestigial vertebrae, body only on most) Bony Thorax Ribs (costal cartilage, true ribs, false ribs, floating ribs, facets) Sternum Manubrium Body Xiphoid Process Appendicular Skeleton Upper Limb Pectoral Girdle Scapula (acromion, coracoid process, glenoid cavity, spine) Clavicle Upper Arm Humerus (head, greater tubercle, lesser tubercle, olecranon fossa) Forearm Radius Ulna (olecranon process) Hand Carpals Metacarpals Phalanges Lower Limb Pelvic Girdle Os Coxae (sacroiliac joint, acetabulum, obturator foramen, false pelvis, difference between male and female pelvis) Ilium (iliac crest) Ischium (ischial tuberosity) Pubis (pubic symphysis) Thigh Femur (head, neck) Patella Lower Leg Tibia Fibula Foot Tarsals Metatarsals Phalanges.
    [Show full text]
  • Occipital Condyle Screws: Indications and Technique
    163 Review of Techniques on Advanced Techniques in Complex Cervical Spine Surgery Occipital condyle screws: indications and technique Aju Bosco1, Ilyas Aleem2, Frank La Marca3 1Assistant Professor in Orthopedics and Spine Surgery, Orthopedic Spine Surgery Unit, Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Madras Medical College, Chennai, India; 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Michigan, 2912 Taubman Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; 3Professor of Neurological Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Jackson, MI, USA Contributions: (I) Conception and design: All authors; (II) Administrative support: All authors; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: A Bosco, I Aleem; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: A Bosco; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: A Bosco, I Aleem; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors. Correspondence to: Aju Bosco, MS, DNB, FNB (Spine Surgery). Assistant Professor in Orthopedics and Spine Surgery, Orthopedic Spine Surgery Unit, Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Madras Medical College, EVR Road, Park Town, Chennai, India. Email: [email protected]. Abstract: Occipitocervical instability is a life threatening and disabling disorder caused by a myriad of pathologies. Restoring the anatomical integrity and stability of the occipitocervical junction (OCJ) is essential to achieve optimal clinical outcomes. Surgical stabilization of the OCJ is challenging and technically demanding. There is a paucity of options available for anchorage in the cephalad part of the construct in occipitocervical fixation systems due to the intricate topography of the craniocervical junction combined with the risk of injury to the surrounding anatomical structures. Surgical techniques and instrumentation for stabilizing the unstable OCJ have undergone several modifications over the years and have primarily depended on occipital squama-based fixations.
    [Show full text]
  • Lab Exercise 5 Axial Skeleton
    Lab Exercise 5 Axial Skeleton Textbook Reference: See Chapter 8 What you need to be able to do on the exam after completing this lab exercise: Be able to name all the listed bone and bone features on the skull models. Be able to name the listed parts of the ribcage and sternum on the models in the lab. Be able to name the hyoid bone, if shown individually. Be able to name the different vertebrae, if shown individually, as given in this lab exercise. Be able to name the listed features of each vertebra on the vertebrae in the lab. Be able to name the sacrum and the listed parts of the sacrum on the models in the lab. Be able to name the coccyx, if individually shown. 5-1 The following tables contain terms that are useful when learning the various bone features. The terms will NOT be on the test. They are simply here for you to use when learning the names of the bone features. 5 -2 Axial Skeleton The axial skeleton consists of the skull, the ribcage, and the vertebrae. The Skull Know the following bones/bone features on the skull models. 1. frontal bone 10. sphenoid bone 21. coronoid process 2. parietal bone 11. zygomatic bone 22. mandibular condyle 3. occipital bone 12. nasal bone 23. coronal suture 4. temporal bone 13. maxilla 25. lambdoid suture 5. mastoid process 14. lacrimal bone 28. squamous suture 8. mandibular fossa 15. ethmoid bone 42. external auditory meatus 9. styloid process 20. mandible 52. mental foramen 62.
    [Show full text]
  • Bone Handout”)
    The Skeletal System (“Bone Handout”) Bone Markings - as in Table 6.1, know categories, names, descriptions and categories of bone markings Common Fractures - as in Table 6.2, identify type from pictures The Axial Skeleton Skull Cranial bones frontal (supraorbital foramen) parietal temporal (mastoid process, external auditory(acoustic) meatus, styloid process, zygomatic process, stylomastoid foramen) occipital (foramen magnum, hypoglossal canal, occipital condyles) sphenoid (optic canal, superior orbital fissure, sella turcica, foramen rotundum, foramen ovale, foramen spinosum , greater wings, lesser wings) ethmoid (olfactory foramina) Relevant Figures: 7.4, 7.6, 7.7a, 7.9 Facial bones nasal maxilla (infraorbital foramen, inferior orbital fissure) zygomatic mandible (mental foramen, body, ramus, mandibular condyle) lacrimal (lacrimal fossa) palatine inferior nasal conchae vomer Relevant Figures: 7.4, 7.6, 7.7a Sutures coronal sagittal lambdoid squamous Relevant Figures: 7.4, 7.5 Paranasal Sinuses frontal sphenoidal maxillary ethmoidal Relevant Figures: 7.15 Fontanels anterior posterior sphenoidal mastoid Relevant Figures: 7.28 Hyoid bone Relevant Figures: 7.17 1 Vertebrae Parts of a “typical vertebra” using thoracic as example body vertebral arch (pedicle, lamina, vertebral foramen) intervertebral foramen transverse process spinous process superior articular process inferior articular process Divisions of vertebral column cervical (transverse foramina) thoracic (transverse costal facet - for tubercle of rib, superior and inferior costal
    [Show full text]
  • THE ANATOMY of OCCIPITAL CONDYLES and FORAMEN MAGNUM and THEIR SURGICAL IMPORTANCE: a MORPHOMETRIC STUDY Arpan Dubey *1, S
    International Journal of Anatomy and Research, Int J Anat Res 2017, Vol 5(2.1):3780-83. ISSN 2321-4287 Original Research Article DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2017.193 THE ANATOMY OF OCCIPITAL CONDYLES AND FORAMEN MAGNUM AND THEIR SURGICAL IMPORTANCE: A MORPHOMETRIC STUDY Arpan Dubey *1, S. K. Verma 2. *1 Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Bundelkhand Medical College, Sagar. Madhaya Pradesh, India. 2 HOD & Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Bundelkhand Medical College, Sagar. Madhaya Pradesh, India. ABSTRACT Background: Skull is the most complex osseous structure in the body. Foramen magnum is oval shaped and situated in an anteromedian position. Occipital condyles flanking the foramen magnum articulate with the superior articular facets of atlas vertebra. The dimensions of foramen magnum and the axial length of occipital condyles are very important for surgical exposure, such as in cases of tumor resection from foramen magnum area. Keeping in mind the importance of skull base in Anatomic, neurosurgical, medico legal and anthropological procedures, present study aims at performing morphometric analysis of occipital condyles and foramen magnum, two of the most prominent structures at the skull base. Materials and Methods: Present study was conducted on 80 dry adult human skulls (42 males and 38 females). They were obtained from department of Anatomy, Govt. Bundelkhand Medical College, Sagar and NSCB Medical College, Jabalpur, (M.P.). Measured parameters were: Axial length of occipital condyles, Anterior intercondylar distance, Anteroposterior diameter of foramen magnum, Transverse diameter of foramen magnum. The parameters were measured by digital sliding vernier caliper in mm. scale. Data was statistically analyzed.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology 152 – Axial Skeleton Anatomy Objectives
    Biology 152 – Axial Skeleton Anatomy Objectives For this assignment, we will be learning bone names, specialized structures, and left/right/medial aspects of the skull, vertebrae, and ribcage. You will want to learn the bone names first, and then practice the parts of the bones (sutures, foramina, processes, etc.). NOTE: The sides of a skull and ribcage (left versus right) are the patient's sides, not yours! SKULL BONES – learn their names and positions first ethmoid roof of nose and medial orbits frontal forehead inferior nasal conchae lateral to vomer; inferior in nasal cavity middle nasal conchae lateral to perpendicular plate; middle of the nasal cavity lacrimals with tear glands/ducts mandible lower jaw; fused single bone in adults maxillae upper jaw bones nasals bones at the bridge of the nose occipital inferior and posterior palatines roof of mouth - hard palate parietals superior and lateral sides of skull sphenoid keystone of brain; winglike projections under skull temporals temples zygomatics cheekbones vomer inferior and medial in nasal cavity hyoid anterior of neck; behind the mandible ossicles of ear malleus, incus, and stapes (MIS) inside temporal FORAMINAE – openings through bones for blood vessels and nerves to pass carotid canal for the carotid artery condyloid foramen behind the occipital condyle external acoustic (or sound waves enter skull to tympanic membrane auditory) meatus eye orbit entire region where the eye is housed greater palatine foramen on palatine bone; lateral edges hypoglossal foramen in front of the
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomy Lab: the Skeletal System Part I: Vertebrae and Thoracic Cage
    ANA Lab: Bone 1 Anatomy Lab: The skeletal system Part I: Vertebrae and Thoracic cage Spine (Vertebrae) Body Vertebral arch Vertebral canal Pedicle Lamina Spinous process Transverse process Sup. articular facets Inf. articular facets Sup. vertebral notch Inf. vertebral notch Intervertebral foramen Cervical vertebrae: 7 Typical (C3-C6) Transverse foramen C1, Atlas C2, Axis: dens C7 Thoracic vertebrae: 12 Typical (T2-T10) T1 T11, 12 Lumbar vertebrae: 5 Typical (L1-4) Sacrum: 5 Ala Anterior sacral foramina Posterior sacral foramina Sacral canal ANA Lab: Bone 2 Sacral hiatus promontory median sacral crest intermediate crest lateral crest Coccyx Horns Transverse process Thoracic cages Ribs: 12 pairs Typical ribs (R3-R10): Head, 2 facets intermediate crest neck tubercle angle costal cartilage costal groove R1 R2 R11,12 Sternum Manubrium of sternum Clavicular notch for sternoclavicular joint body xiphoid process ANA Lab: Bone 3 Part II: Skull and Facial skeleton Skull Cranial skeleton, Calvaria (neurocranium) Facial skeleton (viscerocranium) Overview: identify the margin of each bone Cranial skeleton 1. Lateral view Frontal Temporal Parietal Occipital 2. Cranial base midline: Ethmoid, Sphenoid, Occipital bilateral: Temporal Viscerocranium 1. Anterior view Ethmoid, Vomer, Mandible Maxilla, Zygoma, Nasal, Lacrimal, Inferior nasal chonae, Palatine 2. Inferior view Palatine, Maxilla, Zygoma Sutures: external view vs. internal view Coronal suture Sagittal suture Lambdoid suture External appearance of skull Posterior view external occipital protuberance
    [Show full text]
  • Traumatic Avulsion Fracture of the Occipital Condyles and Clivus with Associated Unilateral Atlantooccipital Distraction
    1181 Traumatic Avulsion Fracture of the Occipital Condyles and Clivus with Associated Unilateral Atlantooccipital Distraction D. Neil Jones,1 Alastair M. Knox, and Michael R. Sage We describe an unusual tramatic fracture/distraction injury of the craniovertebral junction was then acquired, which demon­ of the craniovertebral junction, which the patient survived. It strated an intact spinal cord and brainstem with no evidence of is postulated that this represents an example of the spectrum transection. A hematoma was noted anterior to the upper cervical of fracture dislocation injuries that may occur at, and adjacent cord and medulla, resulting in posterior displacement of these struc­ tures (Fig . 6). to, the atlantooccipital joints. Avulsion fractures in this region , On arrival at the accident and emergency department, the patient associated with atlantooccipital dislocation, may be more was ventilating spontaneously, but no limb movements were noted common than previously suspected, particularly in adults, in and muscle tone was flaccid . There was no response to painful whom supporting ligaments are strong and not apt to rupture. stimuli. Deep tendon reflexes were absent in the upper limbs, but Thin-section CT with coronal and sagittal reformation can present and symmetrical in both lower limbs. Over the next 4 weeks best visualize these fractures, while MR imaging is useful in he was able to communicate with eye blinking, but remained quad­ the assessment of the adjacent soft tissues. raplegic. The patient underwent a surgical posterior fusion procedure for stabilization of the craniovertebral junction. Case Report A 43-year-old man was a competitor in a speedboat race, when , Discussion at an estimated speed of 130 kph (80 mph), the boat flipped and he was flung into the water.
    [Show full text]
  • Aandp1ch08lecture.Pdf
    Chapter 08 Lecture Outline See separate PowerPoint slides for all figures and tables pre- inserted into PowerPoint without notes. Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. Permission required for reproduction or display. 1 Introduction • Many organs are named for their relationships to nearby bones • Understanding muscle movements also depends on knowledge of skeletal anatomy • Positions, shapes, and processes of bones can serve as landmarks for clinicians 8-2 Overview of the Skeleton Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. Frontal bone Parietal bone • Axial skeleton is Occipital bone Skull Maxilla colored beige Mandible Mandible – Forms central Clavicle Clavicle Pectoral girdle Scapula Scapula supporting axis of Sternum body Thoracic Ribs Humerus cage Costal cartilages – Skull, vertebrae, sternum, ribs, Vertebral column sacrum, and hyoid Hip bone Pelvis Sacrum Ulna Coccyx Radius Carpus • Appendicular Metacarpal bones Phalanges skeleton is colored green Femur – Pectoral girdle Patella – Upper extremity Fibula – Pelvic girdle Tibia – Lower extremity Metatarsal bones Tarsus Figure 8.1 Phalanges 8-3 (a) Anterior view (b) Posterior view Bones of the Skeletal System • Number of bones – 206 in typical adult skeleton • Varies with development of sesamoid bones – Bones that form within tendons (e.g., patella) • Varies with presence of sutural (wormian) bones in skull – Extra bones that develop in skull suture lines – 270 bones at birth, but number decreases with fusion 8-4 Anatomical Features of Bones • Bone markings—ridges, spines, bumps, depressions, canals, pores, slits, cavities, and articular surfaces • Ways to study bones – Articulated skeleton: held together by wire and rods, shows spatial relationships between bones – Disarticulated bones: taken apart so their surface features can be studied in detail 8-5 Anatomical Features of Bones 8-6 Anatomical Features of Bones Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomy of Skull by : Dr
    Anatomy of skull By : Dr. Hassna B. Jawad At the end of the lecture you should be able to: • Identify basic anatomical features of the skull • recognize different bones of skull • Identify outer bony features of each bone of the skull The human skull is the bony structure that forms the head in the human skeleton. It supports the structures of the face and forms a cavity for the brain. The skull consists of two parts: 1. Neurocranium : cranial bones (braincase) form the protective cranial cavity that surrounds and houses the brain and brainstem. 2. Viscerocranium ( facial bones ):formed by bones supporting the face. Except for the mandible, all of the bones of the skull are joined by synarthrodial (immovable) joints . Sometimes there can be extra bone pieces within the suture known as sutural bones. The human skull is consisted of 22 bones 8 cranial bones and14 facial skeleton bones. Cranial bones : 2 temporal bones, 2 parietal bones, 1occipital ,1 sphenoid, 1ethmoid and 1 frontal bones. Facial bones, 2 nasal conchae, 2 nasal bones, 2 maxilla, 2 palatine bones, 2 zygomatic bones, 2lacrimal bones , 1 vomer and 1 mandible. In the cranial bones, the layers of compact tissue are known as the tables of the skull; the outer one is thick and tough; the inner is thin, dense, and brittle, and hence is termed the vitreous (glass-like) table. 1 Anatomy of skull By : Dr. Hassna B. Jawad These bones are enclosing between a cancellous bone called the diploë, and this, in the nasal region of the skull, becomes absorbed so as to leave spaces filled with air–the paranasal sinuses between the two tables.
    [Show full text]
  • Fracture of the Occipital Condyle: the Forgotten Part of the Neck
    220 J Accid Emerg Med 2000;17:220–228 CASE REPORTS J Accid Emerg Med: first published as 10.1136/emj.17.3.225 on 1 May 2000. Downloaded from Fracture of the occipital condyle: the forgotten part of the neck Andrew Kelly, Richard Parrish Abstract A case of occipital condylar fracture in a multiply injured and unconscious motor- cyclist is reported. This injury was clini- cally unsuspected but found on the lowest cuts of head computed tomography. It is shown that this site is often inadequately imaged when scanning the head and neck in victims of trauma. The Anderson and Montesano classification of occipital con- dylar fracture is described. It is noted that types 1 and 2 are stable injuries but type 3 is potentially unstable. A retrospective analysis of 30 head computed tomography scans in trauma cases revealed that in only 16 were the occipital condyles adequately imaged. It is emphasised that vigilance is required to detect fractures of the occipi- tal condyle and that it should be standard Figure 1 Computed tomography showing fractured right practice to include this area when per- occipital condyle. forming computed tomography of the head in trauma victims. ists and the neurosurgical team. Intracranial (J Accid Emerg Med 2000;17:220–221) pressure was monitored and remained normal. Halo traction was applied before his extubation http://emj.bmj.com/ Keywords: occipital condyle; fracture; trauma on day four. He required three months rigid fixation in a halo vest. Follow up computed Case report tomography showed healing at the fracture site A 16 year old male road traYc accident victim without evidence of subluxation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Posterior Condylar Canal
    The Posterior Condylar Canal Lawrence E. Ginsberg PURPOSE: To assess the prevalence and appearance of the posterior condylar canal using high­ resolution CT. METHODS: One hundred twenty-three high-resolution temporal bone CT exami­ nations were retrospectively reviewed for the presence or absence of the posterior condylar canal. Thirty-four gross skulls were also examined. RESULTS: The posterior condylar canal was identified on CT bilaterally in 31 % of the final study group and unilaterally in 50%. On gross specimens, this structure was identified in 55.9% bilaterally and 17.6% unilaterally. The posterior condylar canal, when present, is readily identifiable in a predictable location. The imaging appearance of this structure is dependent on its relationship to the angle of scanning. CONCLUSION: The posterior condylar canal is among the largest emissary foramina in the human skull. Recognition of this structure and its role as an alternative source of venous drainage from the brain will help avoid misinterpretation during CT examination. Index terms: Skull, anatomy; Skull, computed tomography; Cerebral blood flow AJNR Am J Neuroradio/15:969-972, May 1994 Emissary veins exist in the skull as an escape tween the jugular bulb and the suboccipital ve­ mechanism, an alternative route of egress for nous plexus (1-4). venous blood (1-4). When the normal routes of The purpose of this report was to study the venous drainage are patent, the role of emissary anatomy and imaging appearance of the posterior veins is limited. However, should venous outflow condyloid canal. Recognition of this common be compromised (ie, jugular thrombosis), these canal is useful for understanding alternative path­ accessory conduits become an important alter­ ways of venous flow and avoiding confusion native pathway for venous drainage of the brain.
    [Show full text]