CTI Marine Values Framework: PNG Implementation
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Project Proposal Form 2019
Project Proposal Form 2019 Introduction One of the key objectives of the National ICT Policy is to ensure equitable access to Information and Communication Technology Services. The policy objective is founded on the premise that ICT is seen as necessary tool for economic growth and social development. The Universal Access Board within NICTA is mandated to give effect to this policy by identifying and developing projects aimed at bridging the telecommunications and ICT gap that limits the opportunities available to ordinary citizens. Within this context, the National Information and Communications Technology Authority (NICTA) is inviting stakeholders including the general public, ICT operators and service providers to propose or suggest any projects or programs that you think are consistent with the overarching goals within the ICT sector and that NICTA should consider in its current or future programs. Proposals that are accepted will be considered by the UAS Board for potential inclusion in the 2019 UAS programs. Scope of Proposals All stakeholders including the general public, ICT operators and service providers are invited to propose or suggest any project for NICTA’s consideration. The submitted proposals should seek to promote the long-term economic and social development of Papua New Guinea through projects that will among other things, encourage the development of ICT infrastructure and improve the availability of ICT services within the country including under-served communities and geographic areas. Proponents are advised to note that submitting proposals does not secure funding/assistance from NICTA in any form or guarantee inclusion in the UAS programs. Submitted proposals will only be received as project concepts for NICTA’s consideration. -
791 2946 3073 3123 TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS Gazelle Water
791 588 East New Britain Provincial Government (in Millions of Kina) PIP 5 Year No. Project Title Total 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2946 Gazelle Water 5.0 3.0 2.0 3073 RDRElectric 3.0 3.0 3123 SAMPUN DAY CLINIC 1.1 .5 .5 TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 9.1 6.5 2.5 TOTAL 9.1 6.5 2.5 792 588 East New Britain Provincial Government AGENCY SUMMARY OF ALL PROJECTS EXPENDITURE PROJECTIONS AND FINANCING REQUIREMENTS (K Millions) PROJECT COST 2008 2009 5 Year 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Actual Total DIRECT PROJECT COST Current Expenditure Current Transfers Personal Emoluments Goods and Other Services 1.1 .5 .5 Sub-Total 1.1 .5 .5 Capital Expenditure Capital Transfers Acquisition of Existing Assets Capital Formation 3.0 8.0 6.0 2.0 Sub-Total 3.0 8.0 6.0 2.0 A TOT DIRECT PROJECT COST 3.0 9.1 6.5 2.5 Technical Assistance Project Preparation Equipment Advisory Training B TOT TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TOTAL PROJECT COST (A+B) 3.0 9.1 6.5 2.5 FINANCING SOURCES IDENTIFIED FINANCING Direct Project Financing: Government Contributions: Loan Grant 1.1 .5 .5 b) Self Generating Revenue a) Government Input 3.0 6.0 6.0 C TOTAL DIRECT FINANCING 3.0 7.1 6.5 .5 D Technical Assistance TOTAL FINANCING (C+D) 3.0 7.1 6.5 .5 FINANCING SOUGHT Direct Project Cost (A-C) 2.0 2.0 Technical Assistance (B-D) TOTAL FINANCING SOUGHT 2.0 2.0 793 PIP NUMBER: 2946 PROJECT NAME: GAZELLE DISTRICT WATER SUPPLY PROJECT EXECUTING AGENCY: East New Britain Provincial Government PROJECT OBJECTIVIES: To provide sustainable rural water supply for the people of Gazelle Peninsula through the establishment of a water supply system. -
RAPID ASSESSMENT of AVOIDABLE BLINDNESS and DIABETIC RETINOPATHY REPORT Papua New Guinea 2017
RAPID ASSESSMENT OF AVOIDABLE BLINDNESS AND DIABETIC RETINOPATHY REPORT Papua New Guinea 2017 RAPID ASSESSMENT OF AVOIDABLE BLINDNESS AND DIABETIC RETINOPATHY PAPUA NEW GUINEA, 2017 1 Acknowledgements The Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness (RAAB) + Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) was a Brien Holden Vision Institute (the Institute) project, conducted in cooperation with the Institute’s partner in Papua New Guinea (PNG) – PNG Eye Care. We would like to sincerely thank the Fred Hollows Foundation, Australia for providing project funding, PNG Eye Care for managing the field work logistics, Fred Hollows New Zealand for providing expertise to the steering committee, Dr Hans Limburg and Dr Ana Cama for providing the RAAB training. We also wish to acknowledge the National Prevention of Blindness Committee in PNG and the following individuals for their tremendous contributions: Dr Jambi Garap – President of National Prevention of Blindness Committee PNG, Board President of PNG Eye Care Dr Simon Melengas – Chief Ophthalmologist PNG Dr Geoffrey Wabulembo - Paediatric ophthalmologist, University of PNG and CBM Mr Samuel Koim – General Manager, PNG Eye Care Dr Georgia Guldan – Professor of Public Health, Acting Head of Division of Public Health, School of Medical and Health Services, University of PNG Dr Apisai Kerek – Ophthalmologist, Port Moresby General Hospital Dr Robert Ko – Ophthalmologist, Port Moresby General Hospital Dr David Pahau – Ophthalmologist, Boram General Hospital Dr Waimbe Wahamu – Ophthalmologist, Mt Hagen Hospital Ms Theresa Gende -
2009 Provincial and District Universal Basic Education Profile
OTHER PUBLICATION Jeremy Goro EAST NEW BRITAIN Kilala Devette-Chee Peter Magury PROVINCE Daphney Kollin 2009 PROVINCIAL AND Martha Waim DISTRICT UNIVERSAL BASIC www.pngnri.org EDUCATION PROFILE September 2020 This page is intentionally left blank OTHER PUBLICATION EAST NEW BRITAIN Jeremy Goro Kilala Devette-Chee PROVINCE Peter Magury Daphney Kollin 2009 PROVINCIAL AND Martha Waim DISTRICT UNIVERSAL BASIC EDUCATION PROFILE September 2020 First published in September 2020 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Copyright © 2020 The National Research Institute. Direct any inquiries regarding this publication to: The Publications Editor National Research Institute P.O. Box 5854 Boroko, NCD 111 Papua New Guinea Tel: +675 326 0300/326 0061; Fax: +675 326 0213 Email: [email protected] Website: www.pngnri.org The Papua New Guinea National Research Institute (PNG NRI) is an independent statutory authority established by an Act of Parliament in 1988 and confirmed by the IASER (Amendment) Act 1993. PNG NRI is mandated by legislation to carry out independent research and analysis on development issues affecting PNG. The legislation states that the functions of the PNG NRI are: (a) The promotion of research into Papua New Guinea society and the economy; and, (b) The undertaking of research into social, political and economic problems of Papua New Guinea in order to enable practical solutions to such problems to be formulated. ISBN 9980 75 277 7 National Library Service of Papua New Guinea ABCDE 202423222120 The opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and not necessarily the views of the Papua New Guinea National Research Institute. -
ENVIRONMENTAL and SOCIAL BASELINE REPORT Public Disclosure Authorized and IMPACT ASSESSMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL BASELINE REPORT Public Disclosure Authorized AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE PNG AGRICULTURE COMMERCIALIZATION AND Public Disclosure Authorized DIVERSIFICATION PROJECT (PACD) Public Disclosure Authorized Prepared for the Department of Agriculture and Livestock March 2019 Public Disclosure Authorized 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 4 A.1 Methodology .......................................................................................................... 4 A.2 Project Description ................................................................................................ 5 A.3 Geographical coverage .......................................................................................... 6 PART ONE: BASELINE REPORT ......................................................................................... 7 B. Country Profile .............................................................................................................. 7 B.1 System of Government .......................................................................................... 8 National .............................................................................................................................. 8 Provincial ........................................................................................................................... 9 District............................................................................................................................. -
47356-002: Power Sector Development Investment Program
Initial Environmental Examination March 2021 Papua New Guinea: Power Sector Development Project Prepared by PNG Power Ltd for the Department of Petroleum and Energy, PNG, and the Asian Development Bank CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 10 March 2021) Currency unit – kina (K) K1.00 = $0.29 $1.00 = K3.51 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank AIFFP – Australian Infrastructure Financing Facility for the Pacific CEMP – Contractor Environmental Management Plan DNPM – Department of National Planning and Monitoring EMP – environment management plan FIRR – financial internal rate of return GBV – gender-based violence IEE – initial environmental examination kV – kilovolt km – kilometer MW – megawatt PAM – project administration manual PMU – project management unit PNG – Papua New Guinea PPL – PNG Power Limited ROW – right-of-way SCADA – supervisory control and data acquisition SOE – state-owned enterprise STEM – Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics TEIP – Town Electrification Investment Program NOTE In this report, “$” refers to United States dollars unless otherwise stated. This initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian ii Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. iii CONTENTS CONTENTS I FIGURES II TABLES II ABBREVIATIONS III ELECTRICAL TERMINOLOGY III EXECUTIVE SUMMARY V I. -
New Actors, Historic Landscapes
New Actors, Historic Landscapes The Making of a Frontier Place in Papua New Guinea Tuomas Tammisto Research Series in Anthropology University of Helsinki Academic Dissertation Research Series in Anthropology University of Helsinki, Finland Distributed by Unigrafia asiakaspalvelu@unigrafia.fi http://shop.unigrafia.fi ISSN 1458-3186 ISBN 978-951-51-4026-5 (paperback) ISBN 978-951-51-4027-2 (PDF) Unigrafia 2018 Dedicated to the memory of Koska Lamail, Peter Vomne and Martina Gomeyan. Contents List of figures, maps and tables vii Acknowledgements viii 1. Introduction1 1.1 Wide Bay as a frontier and a lived environment3 1.2 Making people, places and environments: research questions and theoretical framework 11 1.3 Doing fieldwork in Wide Bay 28 Part I: Land and Locality 35 2. Gardens, plants and land: socially productive work and the media of relatedness 37 2.1 Main food crops: care, continuity and history 40 2.2 Clearing and dividing a garden 44 2.3 Gardens and land-use 48 2.4 Conclusions 54 3. Making temporal environments: work, places and history in the Mengen landscape 56 3.1 The Mengen tree calendar 58 3.2 Gardening & place making 61 3.3 Placed histories & relating to the land 66 3.4 Conclusions 70 Part II: Logging and Landowner Companies 77 4. Logging in Wide Bay 79 4.1 Historical and institutional background 81 4.2 Cape Orford Timber Rights Purchase 85 4.3 Proliferation of landowner companies in Wide Bay 90 4.4 Conclusions 95 5. “The company is just a name!”: constructing corporate entities in logging 98 5.1 The landowner company 102 5.2 Disputing clans 106 5.3 “The company is nothing but a name” 111 5.4 Conclusions 114 Part III: Oil-palm and Wage Labor 121 6. -
Spatial Assessment of Groundwater Potential Zones of East New Britain Province, Papua New Guinea PJAEE, 18 (4) (2021)
Spatial Assessment of Groundwater Potential Zones of East New Britain province, Papua New Guinea PJAEE, 18 (4) (2021) Spatial Assessment of Groundwater Potential Zones of East New Britain province, Papua New Guinea Hejumacla Oboko1, Sujoy Kumar Jana2*, Tingneyuc Sekac3 1,2,3 Department of Surveying and Land Studies, Papua New Guinea University of Technology, Morobe Province, Papua New Guinea Email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] *Corresponding Author: Sujoy Kumar Jana Hejumacla Oboko, Sujoy Kumar Jana, Tingneyuc Sekac: Spatial Assessment of Groundwater Potential Zones of East New Britain province, Papua New Guinea -- Palarch’s Journal Of Archaeology Of Egypt/Egyptology 18(4). ISSN 1567-214x Keywords: Groundwater, Geomorphology, Remote Sensing, GIS, Conservation, Development ABSTRACT Technological advancement nowadays is very helpful with cost effective and time consuming techniques by incorporating GIS and Remote Sensing techniques to delineate groundwater potential map with wide-ranging tools used for the assessment of water resources, its management and conservation. This project is to outline the zonation of groundwater and produces a potential Groundwater map of East New Britain Province. The techniques used are Multi-Influencing Factor (MIF) and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) for the evaluation and assignment of ranks and weights on the different factors such as Lithology, Geomorphology, Soil, Slope, LU/LC, Rainfall, Lineaments & Drainage Density and Vegetation. After assigning each factors with its weightages and ranking individual factors depending on their influence on groundwater potential areas, it is then overlay in the GIS environment using Weighted Sum technique. From the overall results, the groundwater potential areas in the study area are classified into five (5) categories ranging from very good, good, moderate, poor and very poor. -
Payment for Ecosystem Services Options and Opportunities for New
Conservation and Environment Protection Authority PAYMENT FOR ECOSYSTEM SERVICES OPTIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR NEW BRITAIN ISLAND PAPUA NEW GUINEA November 2015 This publication was developed with support from the Papua New Guinea (PNG) Government through the Conservation and Environment Protection Authority in partnership with the United Nations Development Programme’s Global Environment Facility. © 2015 Papua New Guinea Government through the Conservation and Protection Authority Contributor: Michael D. Crane AICP Contact: Michael D. Crane AICP Crane Associates Inc 21 Ivy Lane Suite 202 Burlington Vermont 05408 Email: [email protected] www.craneassociates.us The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the UNDP. Cover Photo: Mangrove seedling being assessed in Numuru village, PNG © Nick Turner/ UNDP TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms 1 9. Relevant policies of Papua New Guinea 29 1. Executive summary 2 PES and land ownership 29 2. Introduction 4 National constitution 29 Literature review 5 The land act of 1996 30 3. The benefits of PES 7 The organic law on provincial governments and 30 local-level governments of 1995 Some cautions 7 Forestry act of 1991 31 4. Payment for ecosystem services defined 9 The oil and gas act of 1998 32 PES performance vs. PES target 9 The mining act of 1992 32 5. Relationship of PES to other conservation 10 tools The environment act 32 6. Types of payments 12 Conservation areas act of 1978 32 Compensation payment 12 Land groups incorporation act (chapter 147) 33 Policy Considerations 12 Conservation and environment protection 34 authority act of 2014 Reward payments 12 PNG medium term development plan 2016-2017 34 Policy Considerations 13 Market payment 13 10. -
Notable Events Book All Regions
NATIONAL STATISTICAL OFFICE 2009 HOUSEHOLD INCOME EXPENDITURE SURVEY NOTABLE EVENTS BOOK ALL REGIONS Population and Social Statistics Division National Statistical Office Waigani, February 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. 1. WHAT IS A NOTABLE EVENTS BOOK? 1 2. WHY DO WE USE A NOTABLE EVENTS BOOK? 1 3. HOW DO YOU USE THE NOTABLE EVENTS BOOK? 1 4. WHEN DO YOU USE THE NOTABLE EVENTS BOOK? 2 5. NOTIONAL EVENTS – SUMMARY 4 6. NOTABLE EVENTS – SOUTHERN REGION 5 7. NOTABLE EVENTS – WESTERN PROVINCE 6 South Fly District 6 Middle Fly District 8 North Fly District 10 8. NOTABLE EVENTS – GULF PROVINCE 11 Kerema District 11 Kikori District 14 9. NOTABLE EVENTS – CENTRAL PROVINCE 17 Abau District 17 Rigo District 19 Kairuku/Hiri District 22 Goilala District 23 10. NOTABLE EVENTS – NATIONAL CAPITAL DISTRICT 25 National Capital District 26 11. NOTABLE EVENTS – MILNE BAY PROVINCE 27 Alotau District 27 Samarai/Murua District 28 Esa’ala District 30 12. NOTABLE EVENTS – ORO (NORTHERN) PROVINCE 31 Sohe District 31 Ijivitari District 33 13. NOTABLE EVENTS – HIGHLANDS REGION 36 14. NOTABLE EVENTS – SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS 37 Ialibu/Pangia District 37 Imbongu District 39 Kagua/Erave District 39 Komo/Magarima District 41 Koroba/Kopiago 41 Mendi District 42 Nipa/Kutubu 43 Tari District 43 15. NOTABLE EVENTS – ENGA PROVINCE 44 Kandep District 44 i Lagaip/Porgera District 44 Wabag District 45 Wapenamanda District 45 16. NOTABLE EVENTS – WESTERN HIGHLANDS PROVINCE 46 Anglimp/South Wahgi District 46 Dei District 47 Hagen Central District 47 Jimi District 48 Mul/Baiyer District 49 North Wahgi District 51 Tambu/Nebilyer District 51 17. -
East New Britain Provincial Government 2016
447_Part 3 Report Draft Template - ENBPG 2016 noga - 14 05 19) Cover Page.pdf 1 16/05/2019 12:12:13 PM Report of the Auditor - General EAST NEW BRITAIN PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT 2016 GPO-XXX-0519KK Report of the Auditor-General On the Financial Statements of the East New Britain Provincial Government for the year ended 31st December, 2016 AUDITOR-GENERAL’S REPORT ON THE EAST NEW BRITAIN PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT 2016 Table of Contents ACRONYMS & GLOSSARY OF TERMS ........................................................................................ 1 1.0 EAST NEW BRITAIN PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT ...................................................... 2 1.1 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Enabling Entity Legislation ..................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Policies, Budget and Corporate Plan........................................................................................ 4 1.3.1 Corporate Plan.............................................................................................................. 4 1.3.2 Policies ......................................................................................................................... 4 1.3.3 Budget and Reporting .................................................................................................. 4 2.0 AUDITOR-GENERAL ........................................................................................................... -
Pcab Exit Strategy Draft
DRAFT DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE Financial Management Improvement Programme Provincial Capacity Building Programme Phase II ( PCaB ) Exit Strategy December 2011 PCaB Exit Strategy 2012 INDICE Executive summary ...................................................................................................................... 3 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 12 2. Background ......................................................................................................................... 13 3. PCaB Project ........................................................................................................................ 14 3.1 PCaB project objectives ................................................................................................ 14 3.2 Methodology ................................................................................................................... 15 4. Results and impact to date............................................................................................... 19 5. Need of an exit strategy.................................................................................................... 30 5.1 Why do we need an Exit Strategy? ............................................................................. 31 5.2 Key issues to consider .................................................................................................... 32 6. Strategic Analysis ..............................................................................................................