The Swantek Site: Late Prehistoric Oneota Expansion and Ethnogenesis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Swantek Site: Late Prehistoric Oneota Expansion and Ethnogenesis The Swantek Site: Late Prehistoric Oneota Expansion and Ethnogenesis by Daniel Christopher Pugh A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Anthropology) in The University of Michigan 2010 Doctoral Committee: Professor John M O’Shea, Chair Professor Gregory E Dowd Professor Kent V Flannery Professor John D Speth © Daniel Christopher Pugh 2010 For Christina, my true north ii Acknowledgements This dissertation would not have been possible without help and support from many individuals and institutions. I would like to thank John O’Shea for more than a decade of academic support and guidance culminating in his role as my primary advisor for this dissertation. John took me in as a starry-eyed young graduate student and helped me to focus my interests and develop intellectual tools for understanding so much more than just archaeology. I know it took great patience to mentor me and John has always provided me with the space I needed to become an independent thinker. My other committee members within the Museum of Anthropology have also been very influential. John Speth has served as a friend as well as a mentor and Kent Flannery has provided a wealth of knowledge and experience that I hope to one day fully comprehend. Greg Dowd graciously joined my committee at a late date having already been influential through his writing and took extra time to provide a unique perspective on my project. To all of my committee members, I cannot thank you enough for the guidance and resources you have provided. Special thanks also to the other faculty members of the University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology who have been remarkably open to discussing my ideas even when they did not relate to course work or even my dissertation project. The museum community is truly something special and I feel very fortunate to have spent time learning from such wonderful people. Within the larger anthropology department, I have iii continued to rely on the advice and mentorship of several other faculty members, and in particular I would like to thank Bruce Mannheim for his unique insights. Perhaps most important for my growth as a graduate student and scholar has been the amazing group of graduate students with whom I have had the fortune of interacting at the University of Michigan. In particular, Lars Fogelin and Sev Fowles took me under their wings when I was a young graduate student and mentored me informally. The long coffee breaks Lars and I shared and the fieldwork and explorations that Sev and I experienced were critical for building my understanding of the world of ideas that constitute archaeology. Sunday Eiselt took me into the field after my first year of graduate school and showed me how a top notch dissertation project was run while putting up with a good deal of sarcasm and bad jokes. Later Bill Parkinson took me into the field so that I could experience “the Nebraska of Europe” (the Carpathian Basin) and helped me to gain a more worldly perspective. I could not have survived coursework without the camaraderie of my fantastic and unique cohort including Liz Bridges, Daphne Gallagher, Kenny Sims, and Sudha Shah. More recently I have thrived on the energy in the museum community and interactions with students as we plug away in the Treehaus. There are too many individuals to whom I am grateful to name here, but I hope you all know how important you are to me. The community of Genoa, Nebraska has been unbelievably generous to me and facilitated the research presented in this document. In particular, the generosity and hospitality of the Swantek and Carlson families was overwhelming. Philip and Sandra Swantek welcomed me onto their farm and shared their knowledge of the area without hesitation and were extremely patient with my excavations, long period of analysis, and iv motley crew of field workers. Likewise, Monty and Angie Swantek welcomed myself, my crew, and my dogs into a trailer home on their property where we lived as neighbors for a summer in 2005. Nancy Carlson was the first to welcome me into the Genoa community and has been unbelievably generous in sharing her expertise on local archaeology, volunteering countless hours of help and labor, baking cookies for the crew, rescuing us when I locked the keys in my truck, and even opening her home to us. Likewise Jerry Carlson contributed to this project in more ways than I can enumerate, sharing his labor, resources, and friendship when they were most valued. Finally, Ralph Miller and his dog Suzique are to be thanked for sharing their home with our odd and muddy group on literally a moment’s notice. The community of Genoa is truly remarkable in its hospitality and unique commitment to history and I hope to one day pay back the debt of gratitude that I feel. Perhaps the most enduring academic relationships that I have are with Brad Logan and Lauren Ritterbush. I first met Brad when I was a high school student in Kansas who didn’t really even know what anthropology was. Brad agreed to meet me for a day of career shadowing and made me feel like a potential member of the academic community at a time when I was barely old enough to drive. Throughout my college career, he and Lauren demonstrated to me how good archaeology is done and shaped me in more ways than I can count. I cannot express enough the depth of my gratitude toward Brad and Lauren for nurturing my nascent interest in prehistory and helping me find my own path. Also in the Great Plains, I have benefitted greatly from input from Donna Roper, Donald Blakeslee, Eric Hollinger, Rob Bozell, Renee Botts, Bob Hoard, Steve Holen, Joe v Artz, and all of the people at the Nebraska State Historical Society, Kansas State Historical Society, and Iowa Office of State Archaeologist. My excavations and research were made possible by generous volunteer work from many people including Brad Krueger, Lindsey Trainor, Kyle Stock, DeAnna Dear, Meghan Howey, Beth Dykstra, Heather Horobik, Heather Rejto, Stephanie Salwen, Elisa Ramirez-Lagos, Erin Lutgens-Rice, Lindsey Reiners, Kenny Swantek, Alice Terrel, Troy Terrel, Ron Cruise, Bob Cruise, Tom Bryant, Chris Bryant, John Drozd, and Eric Deyoe. Although we did not have a formal relationship, the cultural officers of the Pawnee Tribe, particularly Francis Morriss provided an important check on the nature and impact of my work. Most importantly, I could not possibly have done this research without the unending love and support from my family. Christina, my wonderful wife has served as a true north and a sounding board throughout this process. She has also volunteered endless hours of labor excavating, processing artifacts, analyzing my zooarchaeological remains, listening to my ideas, sitting through practice lectures, editing, and working through my struggles. The support and encouragement of my parents, Charles E and Sara Pugh, have never been limited and without that foundation, I could not possibly have enjoyed any of the successes that I have enjoyed in academics or in life. The research was funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, the James B. Griffin Foundation, and the Rackham Graduate School at the University of Michigan. vi Thank you to all of the people and institutions listed above and the countless others that have helped me to grow through the years. Of course any and all errors in this document are entirely my own. vii Table of Contents Dedication………………………………………………………………………………..ii Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………...iii List of Figures………………………………………………………….………………...ix List of Tables……………………………………………………………..…………..….xi List of Appendices…………………………………………………..………………….xiii Abstract……………………………………………………………..…………………..viv Chapter 1. Introduction……………………………………………………….....…....…..1 2. Flux and Transformation in Tribal Societies…………………………...…….10 3. Toward an Archaeology of Ethnogenesis…………………………....…….....54 4. Late Prehistoric Flux in the American Midcontinent……………....…….......88 5. Investigating Ethnogenesis at the Swantek Site……………………...……...138 6. Discussion and Conclusions……………………………………………........201 Appendices…………………………………………………………………...….……..223 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………....281 viii List of Figures Figure 4.1. Itskari area in relation to traditional Oneota territories and major western 101 Oneota sites……………...…………………………………………………..... 4.2. Significant western Oneota sites and all Oneota sites in Nebraska…….... 112 4.3. Sites in Nebraska and Kansas with known Oneota material…………….. 132 5.1. Source areas for major non-gravel toolstones found at the Swantek Site.. 152 5.2. Line drawing and profile of partially reconstructed vessel………………. 160 5.3. Selected rim profiles with diameter estimates…………………………… 161 5.4. Rim radius for all rims………………………………...…………………. 162 5.5. Rim thickness for all rims ………………………………..…………….... 163 5.6. Rim angle for all rims……………………………………………………. 163 5.7. Rim height for all rims …………………………………………………... 164 5.8. All postmolds and features excavated at the Swantek Site ……….…..…. 167 5.9. Selection of projectile points from Swantek excavations………….…..… 168 5.10. Sites used in comparative ceramic analyses……………………………. 175 ix 5.11. Sites used in comparative ceramic analyses……………………………. 180 5.12 Scatterplot of Tanimoto distance values for all test pairs in rank order… 180 5.13. Correlation analysis of Brainerd-Robinson coefficients versus 193 geographic distance for 14 used site pairs…………………..………………... 5.14. Correlations between Brainerd-Robinson coefficients and geographic 194 distance for all site pairs excluding Swantek and White Rock………...……... 5.15. Correlations between Brainerd-Robinson coefficients and geographic 194 distance for site pairs including Swantek and White Rock only………...…… 5.16. Correlations between Brainerd-Robinson coefficients and geographic 195 distance for all site pairs including Swantek……..…………………………... 5.17. Correlation between Brainerd-Robinson coefficients and geographic 196 distance for all site pairs excluding Cribb's Crib……………..………….…… 5.18. Correlations between Brainerd-Robinson coefficients and geographic 197 distance for all site pairs involving Dixon except Dixon vs Vosburg…...…… 5.19.
Recommended publications
  • Current Archaeology in Kansas
    Current Archaeology in Kansas Number 3 2002 Contents Title and Author(s) Page Empty Quarter Archaeology — Donald J. Blakeslee and David T. Hughes 1 What Lies Beneath: Archeological Investigation of Two Deeply Buried Sites in the Whitewater River Basin — C. Tod Bevitt 5 Ongoing Investigations of the Plains Woodland in Central Kansas — Mark A. Latham 9 A High-Power Use-Wear Analysis of Stone Tools Recovered from 14DO417 — William E. Banks 14 Archaeological Investigation of the Scott Site House (14LV1082) Stranger Creek Valley, Northeastern Kansas, A Progress Report — Brad Logan 20 Kansas Archeology Training Program Field School, 2002 — Virginia A. Wulfkuhle 25 Spatial Variability in Central Plains Tradition Lodges — Donna C. Roper 27 Hit and Run: Preliminary Results of Phase III Test Excavations at 14HO308, a Stratified, Multicomponent, Late Prehistoric Site in Southwest Kansas — C. Tod Bevitt 35 Building a Regional Chronology for Southeast Kansas — H.C. Smith 39 Geoarchaeological Survey of Kirwin National Wildlife Refuge, Northwestern Kansas: Application of GIS Method — Brad Logan, William C. Johnson, and Joshua S. Campbell 44 An Update on the Museum of Anthropology — Mary J. Adair 50 Research Notes: Ceramic Sourcing Study Grant Received — Robert J. Hoard 51 Wallace County Research — Janice A. McLean 52 Another Pawnee Site in Kansas? — Donna C. Roper 53 1 2 Empty Quarter Archaeology Donald J. Blakeslee, Wichita State University David T. Hughes, Wichita State University covered most of the upper end. Furthermore, wind erosion has also created a zone around the When a small survey fails to reveal any lake in which it would be nearly impossible to archaeological sites, it is unusual for someone locate sites even if they were present.
    [Show full text]
  • Roger T1." Grange, Jr. a Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The
    Ceramic relationships in the Central Plains Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Grange, Roger Tibbets, 1927- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 09/10/2021 18:53:20 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/565603 CERAMIC RELATIONSHIPS' IN THE CENTRAL PLAINS ^ > 0 ^ . Roger T1." Grange, Jr. A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 19 6 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE I hereby recommend that this dissertation prepared under my direction by Roger T, Grange, Jr»________________________ entitled ______Ceramic Relationships in the Central_____ _____Plains_______________________________________ be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement of the degree of _____Doctor of Philosophy________________________ April 26. 1962 Dissertation Director Date After inspection of the dissertation, the following members of the Final Examination Committee concur in its approval and recommend its acceptance:* 5 / ? / ^ t 5 /? / C 2-— A / , - r y /n / *This approval and acceptance is contingent on the candidate's adequate performance and defense of this dissertation at the final oral examination. The inclusion of this sheet bound into the library copy of the dissertation is evidence of satisfactory performance at the final examination. STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in The University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Drawn by the Bison Late Prehistoric Native Migration Into the Central Plains
    DRAWN BY THE BISON LATE PREHISTORIC NATIVE MIGRATION INTO THE CENTRAL PLAINS LAUREN W. RITTERBUSH Popular images of the Great Plains frequently for instance, are described as relying heavily portray horse-mounted Indians engaged in on bison meat for food and living a nomadic dramatic bison hunts. The importance of these lifestyle in tune with the movements of the hunts is emphasized by the oft-mentioned de­ bison. More sedentary farming societies, such pendence of the Plains Indians on bison. This as the Mandan, Hidatsa, Pawnee, Oto, and animal served as a source of not only food but Kansa, incorporated seasonal long-distance also materials for shelter, clothing, contain­ bison hunts into their annual subsistence, ers, and many other necessities of life. Pursuit which also included gardening. In each case, of the vast bison herds (combined with the multifamily groups formed bands or tribal en­ needs of the Indians' horses for pasturage) af­ tities of some size that cooperated with one fected human patterns of subsistence, mobil­ another during formal bison hunts and other ity, and settlement. The Lakota and Cheyenne, community activities.! Given the importance of bison to these people living on the Great Plains, it is often assumed that a similar pattern of utilization existed in prehistory. Indeed, archeological KEY WORDS: migration, bison, Central Plains, studies have shown that bison hunting was Oneota, Central Plains tradition key to the survival of Paleoindian peoples of the Plains as early as 11,000 years ago. 2 If we Lauren W. Ritterbush is Assistant Professor of Anthropology at Kansas State University.
    [Show full text]
  • Archeological and Bioarcheological Resources of the Northern Plains Edited by George C
    Tri-Services Cultural Resources Research Center USACERL Special Report 97/2 December 1996 U.S. Department of Defense Legacy Resource Management Program U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Construction Engineering Research Laboratory Archeological and Bioarcheological Resources of the Northern Plains edited by George C. Frison and Robert C. Mainfort, with contributions by George C. Frison, Dennis L. Toom, Michael L. Gregg, John Williams, Laura L. Scheiber, George W. Gill, James C. Miller, Julie E. Francis, Robert C. Mainfort, David Schwab, L. Adrien Hannus, Peter Winham, David Walter, David Meyer, Paul R. Picha, and David G. Stanley A Volume in the Central and Northern Plains Archeological Overview Arkansas Archeological Survey Research Series No. 47 1996 Arkansas Archeological Survey Fayetteville, Arkansas 1996 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Archeological and bioarcheological resources of the Northern Plains/ edited by George C. Frison and Robert C. Mainfort; with contributions by George C. Frison [et al.] p. cm. — (Arkansas Archeological Survey research series; no. 47 (USACERL special report; 97/2) “A volume in the Central and Northern Plains archeological overview.” Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-56349-078-1 (alk. paper) 1. Indians of North America—Great Plains—Antiquities. 2. Indians of North America—Anthropometry—Great Plains. 3. Great Plains—Antiquities. I. Frison, George C. II. Mainfort, Robert C. III. Arkansas Archeological Survey. IV. Series. V. Series: USA-CERL special report: N-97/2. E78.G73A74 1996 96-44361 978’.01—dc21 CIP Abstract The 12,000 years of human occupation in the Northwestern Great Plains states of Montana, Wyoming, North Dakota, and South Dakota is reviewed here.
    [Show full text]
  • Plains Anthropologist Author Index
    Author Index AUTHOR INDEX Aaberg, Stephen A. (see Shelley, Phillip H. and George A. Agogino) 1983 Plant Gathering as a Settlement Determinant at the Pilgrim Stone Circle Site. In: Memoir 19. Vol. 28, No. (see Smith, Calvin, John Runyon, and George A. Agogino) 102, pp. 279-303. (see Smith, Shirley and George A. Agogino) Abbott, James T. Agogino, George A. and Al Parrish 1988 A Re-Evaluation of Boulderflow as a Relative Dating 1971 The Fowler-Parrish Site: A Folsom Campsite in Eastern Technique for Surficial Boulder Features. Vol. 33, No. Colorado. Vol. 16, No. 52, pp. 111-114. 119, pp. 113-118. Agogino, George A. and Eugene Galloway Abbott, Jane P. 1963 Osteology of the Four Bear Burials. Vol. 8, No. 19, pp. (see Martin, James E., Robert A. Alex, Lynn M. Alex, Jane P. 57-60. Abbott, Rachel C. Benton, and Louise F. Miller) 1965 The Sister’s Hill Site: A Hell Gap Site in North-Central Adams, Gary Wyoming. Vol. 10, No. 29, pp. 190-195. 1983 Tipi Rings at York Factory: An Archaeological- Ethnographic Interface. In: Memoir 19. Vol. 28, No. Agogino, George A. and Sally K. Sachs 102, pp. 7-15. 1960 Criticism of the Museum Orientation of Existing Antiquity Laws. Vol. 5, No. 9, pp. 31-35. Adovasio, James M. (see Frison, George C., James M. Adovasio, and Ronald C. Agogino, George A. and William Sweetland Carlisle) 1985 The Stolle Mammoth: A Possible Clovis Kill-Site. Vol. 30, No. 107, pp. 73-76. Adovasio, James M., R. L. Andrews, and C. S. Fowler 1982 Some Observations on the Putative Fremont Agogino, George A., David K.
    [Show full text]
  • FLINT HILLS ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE March 26-27, 2004 PROGRAM and ABSTRACTS
    Twenty-Sixth Annual FLINT HILLS ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE March 26-27, 2004 PROGRAM AND ABSTRACTS Hosted by the St. Joseph Museum, St. Joseph, Missouri in cooperation with the Pony Express National Memorial and the St. Joseph Archaeological Society Cover Photography—A King Hill Excavation Scenes from a University of Nebraska excavation at the King Hill site, 23BN1, in southern St. Joseph, Missouri. Photography by Jim D. Feagins (summer of 1972). Note the museum display on the King Hill site at the Friday reception. <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> King Hill, an Oneota Village in St. Joseph, Missouri The King Hill archaeological site is located on a high, loess-covered bluff overlooking the Missouri River valley in the southern part of the city of St. Joseph, Missouri. The King Hill village location contains cultural materials associated with the Fanning Phase (Henning 1998:391-393) a protohistoric/early historic Oneota occupation. This Oneota site is thought to probably represent an early Kansa (Kaw) Indian site (Henning 1970:146, 1993:258; Wedel 1959:17; Ruppert 1974:2). Based on the artifacts recovered, it is felt to have been occupied around A.D. 1700 or very shortly thereafter. The Oneota first appeared in the midwest about a thousand years ago. They inhabited an area that stretched from central Missouri to northern Wisconsin and from northeastern Kansas and eastern Nebraska to southwestern Michigan. They are thought to have developed into a number of historic tribes such as the Kansa, Ioway, Missouri, Omaha, Winnebago, Oto, and others, possibly the Osage. At King Hill, the Oneota women made globular-shaped, shell-tempered pottery, usually with high flaring-rims.
    [Show full text]
  • Digitalcommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Nebraska Anthropologist Anthropology, Department of 1971 A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE ABORIGINAL ARCHEOLOGY OF NEBRASKA Donald J. Blakeslee University of Nebraska, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro Part of the Anthropology Commons Blakeslee, Donald J., "A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE ABORIGINAL ARCHEOLOGY OF NEBRASKA" (1971). Nebraska Anthropologist. 127. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/127 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Anthropology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Nebraska Anthropologist by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in THE NEBRASKA ANTHROPOLOGIST, Volume 1 (1971). Published by the Anthropology Student Group, Department of Anthropology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588 A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE ABORIGINAL ARCIIEOLOGY OF NEBRASKA DONALD J. BLAKESLEE UNIVERSITY OF NDBRASKA INTRODUCTION I have tried to make this Bibliography as complete as possible, including material from surrounding states pertinent to the archeological problems of Nebraska and references which pertain more to the history of Nebraska archeology than to its content. In compiling this list, I have used previous biblio­ graphies by Robert W. Neuman (1962b, 1968) and Jerome E. Petsche (1968) which deal in part with Nebraska archeology. ABBREVIATIONS USED
    [Show full text]
  • Archeology Inventory Table of Contents
    National Historic Landmarks--Archaeology Inventory Theresa E. Solury, 1999 Updated and Revised, 2003 Caridad de la Vega National Historic Landmarks-Archeology Inventory Table of Contents Review Methods and Processes Property Name ..........................................................1 Cultural Affiliation .......................................................1 Time Period .......................................................... 1-2 Property Type ...........................................................2 Significance .......................................................... 2-3 Theme ................................................................3 Restricted Address .......................................................3 Format Explanation .................................................... 3-4 Key to the Data Table ........................................................ 4-6 Data Set Alabama ...............................................................7 Alaska .............................................................. 7-9 Arizona ............................................................. 9-10 Arkansas ..............................................................10 California .............................................................11 Colorado ..............................................................11 Connecticut ........................................................ 11-12 District of Columbia ....................................................12 Florida ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bismarck, ND 58501; 701-255-6000 Or
    75th Annual Plains Anthropological Conference Bismarck, North Dakota October 4-7, 2017 Conference Host: State Historical Society of North Dakota (http://history.nd.gov) Conference Committee State Historical Society of North Dakota: • Amy C. Bleier • Wendi Field Murray • Timothy A. Reed • Fern E. Swenson Staff – State Historical Society of North Dakota: • Claudia Berg • Guinn Hinman • Lorna Meidinger • Brooke Morgan • Amy Munson • Paul Picha • Susan Quinnell • Toni Reinbold • Meagan Schoenfelder • Lisa Steckler • Richard Fisk and Museum Store Thank you Chris Johnston, Treasurer of the Plains Anthropological Society, for your invaluable support and assistance. Conference Logo: The logo of the 75th Annual Plains Anthropological Conference is drawn from a decorated pottery vessel in the On-A-Slant Village archaeological collection. The collection is curated at the State Historical Society of North Dakota, Bismarck. 1 The State Historical Society of North Dakota thanks our conference partners: 2 CONFERENCE VENDORS & EXHIBITS • Anthropology Department, University of Wyoming • Arikara Community Action Group • Beta Analytic, Inc. • Center for Applied Isotope Studies – University of Georgia • John Bluemle, Geologist & Author • KLJ • Archaeophysics LLC • National Park Service • Nebraska Association of Professional Archeologists • Nebraska State Historical Society • North Dakota Archaeological Association • Plains Anthropologist, Journal of the Plains Anthropological Society • St. Cloud State University • SWCA Environmental Consultants • THG Geophysics • Wichita State University 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 GENERAL INFORMATION Conference Headquarters: All conference events, except for the guided tours on Wednesday and Saturday and the reception on Thursday evening, will be held at the Radisson Hotel Bismarck (605 East Broadway Avenue, Bismarck, ND 58501; 701-255-6000 or https://www.radisson.com/bismarck-hotel-nd-58501/ndbisdt).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Three
    CHAPTER THREE Prehistoric and Protohistoric Overview of the White River Badlands Badlands Historic Resource Study • July 2006 • John Milner Associates, Inc. ______________________________________________________________________________________ CHAPTER 3 PREHISTORIC AND PROTOHISTORIC OVERVIEW OF THE WHITE RIVER BADLANDS White River Badlands as an Archeological Region The South Dakota State Plan for Archaeological Resources identifies 24 archeological regions within the state, 10 of which occur on the west side of the Missouri River.1 The White River Badlands archeological region includes all areas drained by the White River. As defined by Winham and Hannus, the eastern portion of the region also includes areas drained by the Bad and Little White rivers, and the northwest part of the region is drained by the South Fork Cheyenne River. The White River Badlands archeological region, which includes portions of Shannon, Pennington, Jackson, Bennett, Todd, and Mellette counties, is generally considered a sub-region of the Northern Plains. Although several cultural histories of the Northern Plains have been written, few have been prepared from the perspective of the Badlands. Rather, the White River Badlands are considered tangential to events occurring on the High Plains to the north, south, and west, or the Middle Missouri region to the east. By necessity, the prehistoric overview presented below represents a synthesis of previous studies within the White River Badlands archeological region, the Northern Plains region, and to a lesser extent the Middle Missouri region. The information presented in this chapter is primarily based on Hannus et al., but it also draws heavily from books and reports prepared by others.2 The purpose of the overview is to present a synthesis of the cultural context, time periods, site types, and cultural groups that occupied the study area during the last 12,000 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Pipestone National Monument, Minnesota Native American Cultural Affiliation and Traditional Association Study
    Pipestone National Monument, Minnesota Native American Cultural Affiliation and Traditional Association Study Item Type Report Authors Zedeño, M. Nieves; Basaldu, R.C. Publisher Bureau of Applied Research in Anthropology, University of Arizona Download date 24/09/2021 17:33:02 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/292671 PIPESTONE NATIONAL MONUMENT, MINNESOTA NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURAL AFFILIATION AND TRADITIONAL ASSOCIATION STUDY Final Report June 30, 2004 María Nieves Zedeño Robert Christopher Basaldú Bureau of Applied Research in Anthropology THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA Tucson, AZ 85721 PIPESTONE NATIONAL MONUMENT, MINNESOTA NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURAL AFFILIATION AND TRADITIONAL ASSOCIA- TION STUDY Final Report Prepared by María Nieves Zedeño And Robert Christopher Basaldú Prepared for National Park Service Midwest Region Under Task Agreement 27 of Cooperative Agreement H8601010007 R.W. Stoffle and M. N. Zedeño, Principal Investigators Bureau of Applied Research in Anthropology University of Arizona Tucson, AZ 86721 June 30, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ................................................................................................................................iii SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ......................................................................................................... iv CHAPTER ONE – STUDY OVERVIEW...................................................................................... 1 Geographic and Cultural Focus of the Research............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Implications for the Phoenix Basin Hohokam
    THE ORGANIZATION OF AGRICULTURAL LABOR AMONG SMALLHOLDER IRRIGATION AGRICULTURALISTS: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PHOENIX BASIN HOHOKAM Christopher N. Watkins ABSTRACT all the labor necessary to maintain agricultural lands Recent research has highlighted the ways in which Hohokam and irrigation features. Canal agriculture is a labor- households organized labor. In this study I consider the possibility intensive activity that requires people to perform a that the Hohokam may have drawn on agricultural labor from be- series of different tasks at coordinated times. This yond the immediate household. Using a sample of 10 ethnographi- form of agriculture encourages large households and cally known smallholder irrigation agriculturalists, I examine the necessitates cooperation between households (see nature and occurrence of supra-household agricultural labor. Wilk and Netting 1984; Wilk and Rathje 1982). While it Sharecropping, or working the land of another in exchange for a share of the crop, is present universally in the ethnographic cases is clear the Hohokam households combined labor to examined. Other forms of supra-household labor such as slavery, construct, maintain, and operate their canal systems, servitude, wage labor, and fixed rent arrangements are present, there has been little research on the source of this la- but are much less common. I propose that sharecropping arrange- bor and the labor required to manage fields and crops. ments did exist between patron-households and client laborers in Should we expect that Hohokam households provided prehistoric Hohokam communities of the Phoenix Basin. Further- all or most of their own labor? If not, where might pa- more, I argue that field houses are a likely context to observe such tron households have turned for client labor? behavior.
    [Show full text]