DOCSLIB.ORG

FED/2012/307-994 TA for Implementation of the Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Reform Programme, Phase II (WSSSRP II)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FED/2012/307-994 TA for Implementation of the Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Reform Programme, Phase II (WSSSRP II) The European Union’s Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Reform Programme Phase II for the Federal Republic of Nigeria FED/2012/307-994 TA for Implementation of the Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Reform Programme, Phase II (WSSSRP II) Six Monthly Report 2 1st September 2013 – 28th February 2014 This project is funded by A project implemented by The European Union WS Atkins International Ltd/ITAD/Enplan WSSSRP II TAT Six Monthly Report 2, March 2014 Notice This document has been produced by ATKINS for the National Planning Commission and European Union Delegation solely for the purpose of the WSSSRP II Six Monthly Report 2 and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. It may not be used by any person for any other purpose other than that specified without the express written permission of ATKINS. Any liability arising out of use by a third party of this document for purposes not wholly connected with the above shall be the responsibility of that party who shall indemnify ATKINS against all claims costs damages and losses arising out of such use. Distribution list Recipient No. copies National Planning Commission 1 EU Delegation 2 Project Directors in FMWR and the six States 7 i WSSSRP II TAT Six Monthly Report 2, March 2014 Contents Abbreviations ..................................................................................................................... iv Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. 1 1 Project management. ....................................................................................... 3 Federal .............................................................................................................................. 3 Anambra ............................................................................................................................ 4 Cross River ........................................................................................................................ 4 Jigawa ............................................................................................................................... 5 Kano 5 Osun 5 Yobe 6 2 Facilitation of the water and sanitation sector reform process. .......................... 6 2.1 Improved water policy and institutional framework at federal level ........................... 6 2.1.1 National Water Resources Bill .......................................................................... 6 2.1.2 IWRM ............................................................................................................... 7 2.1.3 Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) ..................................................................... 7 2.2 Improved water policy and institutional framework in the EU focal States ................ 8 2.2.1 State Water Law ............................................................................................... 8 Anambra ......................................................................................................................... 8 Cross River ..................................................................................................................... 8 Jigawa ............................................................................................................................ 9 Kano ............................................................................................................................... 9 Osun ............................................................................................................................... 9 Yobe ............................................................................................................................. 10 2.2.2 Monitoring and Evaluation .............................................................................. 10 3 Implementation of projects in small towns and urban areas ............................ 11 3.1 Urban and small towns' sector institutions are supported to deliver sustainable water supply service. ............................................................................................. 11 3.1.1 Urban Water Institutions ................................................................................. 11 3.1.2 Urban Water Supply Schemes ........................................................................ 11 Anambra ....................................................................................................................... 12 Cross River ................................................................................................................... 12 Jigawa .......................................................................................................................... 12 Kano ............................................................................................................................. 12 Osun ............................................................................................................................. 12 3.1.3 Small Town Water Supply Schemes ............................................................... 13 Anambra ....................................................................................................................... 13 Cross River ................................................................................................................... 14 Jigawa .......................................................................................................................... 14 Kano ............................................................................................................................. 14 Osun ............................................................................................................................. 15 Yobe ............................................................................................................................. 16 3.1.4 Community Management ................................................................................ 19 Anambra ....................................................................................................................... 19 Cross River ................................................................................................................... 19 Jigawa .......................................................................................................................... 20 Kano ............................................................................................................................. 21 Osun ............................................................................................................................. 21 ii WSSSRP II TAT Six Monthly Report 2, March 2014 Yobe ............................................................................................................................. 22 4 Information processing and monitoring. .......................................................... 23 4.1 State level M&E system, integrated with the federal level system established in the focal States ........................................................................................................... 23 Federal ......................................................................................................................... 23 Anambra ....................................................................................................................... 23 Cross River ................................................................................................................... 23 Jigawa .......................................................................................................................... 23 Kano ............................................................................................................................. 24 Osun ............................................................................................................................. 24 Yobe ............................................................................................................................. 24 5 Coordination ................................................................................................... 24 Federal ......................................................................................................................... 24 Anambra ....................................................................................................................... 25 Cross River ................................................................................................................... 25 Jigawa .......................................................................................................................... 25 Kano ............................................................................................................................. 25 Osun ............................................................................................................................. 25 Yobe ............................................................................................................................. 26 ANNEX 1 IWRM First Mission Report – International Expert .......................................... 27 ANNEX 2 First Mission Report - Support the Design and Construction activities of water supply facilities ............................................................................................... 45 ANNEX 3 Jigawa STOWA Organogram .........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rural Non-Farm Income and Inequality in Nigeria
    2. BACKGROUND INFORMATION, DATA AND SURVEY AREA The utilized data were collected from five different villages surveyed in rural Northern Nigeria between 2004 and 2005. These villages are situated within the Hadejia-Nguru floodplain wetlands of Jigawa state in Northern Nigeria. Data were collected from 200 households selected using a multi-stage stratified random sampling approach. The first sampling stratum was selection of the dry savanna region of northern Nigeria, which comprises six states: Sokoto, Kebbi, Zamfara, Kano, Kaduna and Jigawa. The second stratum was the selection of Jigawa state. Two important elements informed this choice. First, Jigawa state, which was carved out of Kano state in August 1991, has the highest rural population in Nigeria; about 93 percent of the state’s population dwells in rural areas3. Second, agriculture is the dominant sector of the state’s economy, providing employment for over 90 percent of the active labor force. For effective grassroots coverage of the various agricultural activities in Jigawa state, the Jigawa Agricultural and Rural Development (JARDA) is divided into four operational zones that are headquartered in the cities of Birni Kudu, Gumel, Hadejia and Kazaure. Hadejia was selected for this study, forming the third stratum of sampling. Within the Hadejia emirate, there are eight Local Government Areas (LGAs): Auyo, Birniwa, Hadejia, Kaffin-Hausa, Mallam Madori, Kaugama, Kirikasamma and Guri. Kirikasamma LGA was selected for this study, representing the fourth sampling stratum. Kirikassama LGA was specifically chosen because of the area’s intensive economic development and correspondingly higher human population compared to many other parts of Nigeria. In the fifth stratum of sampling, five villages were selected from Kirikassama LGA: Jiyan, Likori, Matarar Galadima, Turabu and Madachi.
    [Show full text]
  • Nigeria's Constitution of 1999
    PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:42 constituteproject.org Nigeria's Constitution of 1999 This complete constitution has been generated from excerpts of texts from the repository of the Comparative Constitutions Project, and distributed on constituteproject.org. constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:42 Table of contents Preamble . 5 Chapter I: General Provisions . 5 Part I: Federal Republic of Nigeria . 5 Part II: Powers of the Federal Republic of Nigeria . 6 Chapter II: Fundamental Objectives and Directive Principles of State Policy . 13 Chapter III: Citizenship . 17 Chapter IV: Fundamental Rights . 20 Chapter V: The Legislature . 28 Part I: National Assembly . 28 A. Composition and Staff of National Assembly . 28 B. Procedure for Summoning and Dissolution of National Assembly . 29 C. Qualifications for Membership of National Assembly and Right of Attendance . 32 D. Elections to National Assembly . 35 E. Powers and Control over Public Funds . 36 Part II: House of Assembly of a State . 40 A. Composition and Staff of House of Assembly . 40 B. Procedure for Summoning and Dissolution of House of Assembly . 41 C. Qualification for Membership of House of Assembly and Right of Attendance . 43 D. Elections to a House of Assembly . 45 E. Powers and Control over Public Funds . 47 Chapter VI: The Executive . 50 Part I: Federal Executive . 50 A. The President of the Federation . 50 B. Establishment of Certain Federal Executive Bodies . 58 C. Public Revenue . 61 D. The Public Service of the Federation . 63 Part II: State Executive . 65 A. Governor of a State . 65 B. Establishment of Certain State Executive Bodies .
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of Hadejia Emirate, Nigeria (1906-1960)
    COLONIALISM AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF AFRICAN SOCIETIES: A CASE STUDY OF HADEJIA EMIRATE, NIGERIA (1906-1960) BY MOHAMMED ABDULLAHI MOHAMMED MAH/42421/141/DF A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE COLLEGE OF HIGHER DEGREES AND RESEARCH IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN HISTORY OF KAMPALA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY MAY, 2015 DECLARATION This is my original work and has not been presented for a Degree or any other academic award in any university or institution of learning. ~ Signature Date MOHAMMED ABDULLAHI MOHAMMED APPROVAL I confirm that the work in this dissertation proposal was done by the candidate under my supervision. Signiture Supervisor name Date Peter Ssekiswa DEDICATION This work is dedicated to my late mother may her soul rest in perfect peace and my humble brother Yusif Bashir Hekimi and my wife Rahana Mustathha and the entire fimily In ACKNOWLEDGEMENT lam indeed grateful to my supervisor Peter Ssekiswa , who tirelessly went through my work and inspired me to dig deeper in to the core of the m matter , His kind critism patience and understanding assrted me a great deal Special thanks go to Vice Chancellor prof P Kazinga also a historian for his courage and commitment , however special thanks goes to Dr Kayindu Vicent , the powerful head of department of education (COEDU ) for friendly and academic discourse at different time , the penalist of the viva accorded thanks for observation and scholarly advise , such as Dr SOFU , Dr Tamale , Dr Ijoma My friends Mustafa Ibrahim Garga
    [Show full text]
  • On the Evolution of the Kazaure Schist Belt of Nw Nigeria: a Re-Interpretation U.A
    GLOBAL JOURNAL OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES VOL 8, NO. 2, 2010: 207-216 207 COPYRIGHT© BACHUDO SCIENCE CO. LTD PRINTED IN NIGERIA. ISSN 1118-0579 www.globaljournalseries.com ; Email: [email protected] ON THE EVOLUTION OF THE KAZAURE SCHIST BELT OF NW NIGERIA: A RE-INTERPRETATION U.A. DANBATTA (Received 25 May 2007; Revision Accepted 17, March 2009) ABSTRACT All previous models of evolution of the Kazaure Schist Belt (KZSB) invoked a simple ensialic mechanism in the context of Pan-African deformation which led to the formation of a marginal back-arc basin floored by continental materials that accepted sediments. The closure of these basins in Pan-African times led to the deformation and metamorphism of the sediment and reactivation of older sediments. Taking into account the presence of Banded Iron Formations (BIFs), metavolcanics and the Kalangai-Zungeru-Ifewara (KZI) fault in the belt, a new model of its evolution is proposed. The new model of evolution of the KZSB considers the evolution of the belt by invoking a simple ensialic mechanism under extensional and compressional regimes, in the context of both Eburnean and Pan-African deformations, as well as Pan-African intrusion of calc-alkaline granites and volcanics. It is effective in explaining the occurrence of BIF, quartzites, conglomerates, and Pan-African granitoids in the belt; and emphasizes the presence of the KZI fault in the evolution of the Kazaure belt. The study led to the conclusion that the belt has formed through ensialic processes, and an evaluation of previous data suggested in previous works is consistent with the new view that the KZSB may represent remnants of Paleoproterozoic cover rocks infolded within an Archaean migmatite-gneiss complex during an Eburnean event, and become reactivated during the Neoproterozoic Pan-African event.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey Report for Out-Of-School Children in Jigawa
    SURVEY REPORT FOR OUT-OF-SCHOOL CHILDREN IN JIGAWA STATE, NIGERIA CO-ORDINATED BY JIGAWA STATE GOVERNMENT IN COLLABORATION WITH ESSPIN August, 2014 Page | 1 Table of Contents Cover page i Acknowledgements iii Preface iv List of Tables v List of Figures vi Acronyms vii Executive Summary viii Section One: Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Objectives 2 1.3 Framework for Out-of-School Children 2 1.4 Profile of Jigawa State 4 Section Two: Methodology 6 2.1 Survey Planning for Out-of-School Children 6 2.2 Sampling Design 7 2.3 Data Quality and Supervision 7 2.4 Pilot Survey 8 2.5 Process of Data Collection and Analysis 9 Section Three: Results for Out-of-School Children 10 3.1 Number of Households and Population Size 10 3.2 Number of Out-of-School Children 12 3.3 Number of Children Attending Schools 20 3.4 Percentages of Out-of-School Children 24 Section Four: Possible Risk Factors for Out-of-School Children 27 4.1 Reasons for Out-of-School Children 27 4.2 Socio-Economic Relationships with Out-of-School Status 28 Section Five: Conclusion and Recommendations 42 5.1 Conclusion 42 5.2 Suggestions and the way forward 45 5.3 Limitations 46 References 47 Appendix A: Questionnaire 48 Page | 2 Appendix B: Interview Guide 52 Appendix C: Number of Children in the Sampled Household 53 Appendix D: Percentages of Children that Dropout from School 54 Appendix E: Percentages of Children that Never Attended School 55 Appendix F: Percentages of Children Attending Only Islamiyya/Quranic 56 Schools Appendix G: Percentages of Children Attending any Form of School 57 Appendix H: Population Projection (3-18) by Age, Sex and LGA, 2014 58 Appendix I: Sampling Variability and Ranges for OOS Children 59 Page | 3 Acknowledgements Education planning is incomplete without credible statistics on out-of-school children.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Violence-Related Deaths in Nafada Local Government Area Of
    # Makai DANIEL http://www.ifra-nigeria.org/IMG/pdf/violence-related-deaths-gombe-jigawa-state-nigeria.pdf A Study of Violence-Related Deaths in Nafada Local Government Area of Gombe State and Auyo, Gagarawa, Gumel, Gwiwa, Kaugama and Yankwasi Local Government Areas of Jigawa State (2006-2014) IFRA-Nigeria working papers series, n°46 20/01/2015 The ‘Invisible Violence’ Project Based in the premises of the French Institute for Research in Africa on the campus of the University of Ibadan, Nigeria Watch is a database project that has monitored fatal incidents and human security in Nigeria since 1 June 2006. The database compiles violent deaths on a daily basis, including fatalities resulting from accidents. It relies on a thorough reading of the Nigerian press (15 dailies & weeklies) and reports from human rights organisations. The two main objectives are to identify dangerous areas and assess the evolution of violence in the country. However, violence is not always reported by the media, especially in remote rural areas that are difficult to access. Hence, in the last 8 years, Nigeria Watch has not recorded any report of fatal incidents in some of the 774 Local Government Areas (LGAs) of the Nigerian Federation. There are two possibilities: either these places were very peaceful, or they were not covered by the media. This series of surveys thus investigates ‘invisible’ violence. By 1 November 2014, there were still 23 LGAs with no report of fatal incidents in the Nigeria Watch database: Udung Uko and Urue-Offong/Oruko (Akwa Ibom), Kwaya Kusar (Borno), Nafada (Gombe), Auyo, Gagarawa, Kaugama and Yankwashi (Jigawa), Ingawa and Matazu (Katsina), Sakaba (Kebbi), Bassa, Igalamela- Odolu and Mopa-Muro (Kogi), Toto (Nassarawa), Ifedayo (Osun), Gudu and Gwadabaw (Sokoto), Ussa (Taraba), and Karasuwa, Machina, Nguru and Yunusari (Yobe).
    [Show full text]
  • Jigawa Code: 17 Lga : Auyo Code: 01 Name of Registration Name of Reg
    INDEPENDENT NATIONAL ELECTORAL COMMISSION (INEC) STATE: JIGAWA CODE: 17 LGA : AUYO CODE: 01 NAME OF REGISTRATION NAME OF REG. AREA COLLATION S/N CODE NAME OF REG. AREA CENTRE (RAC) AREA (RA) CENTRE (RACC) 1 AUYO 01 AUYO SPECIAL PRI. SCH AUYO SPECIAL PRI. SCH 2 AUYAKAYI 02 AUYAKAYI PRI. SCH AUYAKAYI PRI. SCH 3 AYAMA 03 AYAMA PRI SCH AYAMA PRI SCH 4 AYAN 04 AYAN PRI SCH AYAN PRI SCH 5 GAMAFOI 05 GAMAFOI PRI. SCH GAMAFOI PRI. SCH 6 GATAFA 06 GATAFA PRI SCH GATAFA PRI SCH 7 GAMSARKA 07 GAMSARKA PRI SCH GAMSARKA PRI SCH 8 KAFUR 08 KAFUR PRI SCH KAFUR PRI SCH 9 TSIDIR 09 TSIDIR PRI SCH TSIDIR PRI SCH 10 UNIK 10 UNIK PRI SCH UNIK PRI SCH TOTAL LGA : BABURA CODE: 02 NAME OF REGISTRATION NAME OF REG. AREA COLLATION S/N CODE NAME OF REG. AREA CENTRE (RAC) AREA (RA) CENTRE (RACC) 1 BABURA 01 AREWA PRI.SCH AREWA PRI.SCH 2 BATALI 02 BATALI PRI SCH BATALI PRI SCH 3 DORAWA 03 DORAWA PRI. SCH DORAWA PRI. SCH 4 GARU 04 GARU PRI SCH GARU PRI SCH 5 GASAKOLI 05 GASAKOLI PRI. SCH GASAKOLI PRI. SCH 6 INSHARUWA 06 INSHARUWA PRI SC INSHARUWA PRI SC 7 JIGAWA 07 JIGAWA PRI SCH JIGAWA PRI SCH 8 KANYA 08 KANYA PRI. SCH KANYA PRI. SCH 9 KAZUNZUMI 09 KAZUNZUMI PRI SCH KAZUNZUMI PRI SCH 10 KYAMBO 10 KYAMBO PRI SCH KYAMBO PRI SCH 11 TAKWASA 11 TAKWASA PRI SCH TAKWASA PRI SCH TOTAL LGA : BIRRIN-KUDU CODE: 03 NAME OF REGISTRATION NAME OF REG.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Management Issues in the Hadejia-Jama'are-Komadugu-Yobe
    Water Management Issues in the Hadejia-Jama'are-Komadugu-Yobe Basin: DFID-JWL and Stakeholders Experience in Information Sharing, Reaching Consensus and Physical Interventions Muhammad J. Chiroma. DFID-Joint Wetlands Livelihoods Project (JWL). Nigeria. [email protected]. Yahaya D. Kazaure. Hadejia-Jama'are River Basin Authority. Nigeria. [email protected]. Yahya B. Karaye. Kano State Water Board Nigeria. [email protected] and Abba J. Gashua. Yobe State ADP Nigeria. abba [email protected]. Abstract The Hadejia-Jama'are-Komadugu-Yobe Basin (HJKYB) is an inter-state and transboundary basin in Northern Nigeria. Covering an area of approximately 84,000 km 2 is an area of recent drama in water resources issues. Natural phenomena combining with long time institutional failure in management of water resources of the basin have led to environmental degradation, loss of livelihoods, resources use competition and conflicts, apathy and poverty among the various resource users in the basin. Unfortunately, complexities in statutory and traditional framework for water mf;magement has been a major bottleneck for proper water resources management in the basin. The Joint Wetlands Livelihoods (JWL) Project, which is supported by the United Kingdom Department for International Development (DFID), has been designed to address increasing poverty and other resources use issues in the basin. Specifically, JWL is concerned with demonstrating processes that will help to improve the management of common pool resources (CPRs) - particularly water resources,.; in the Hadejia-Nguru Wetlands (HNWs) in particular and the HJKYB as a whole as a means ofreducing poverty. This process has brought together key stakeholders to form platforms for developing and implementing strategies to overcome CPR management problems.
    [Show full text]
  • States and Lcdas Codes.Cdr
    PFA CODES 28 UKANEFUN KPK AK 6 CHIBOK CBK BO 8 ETSAKO-EAST AGD ED 20 ONUIMO KWE IM 32 RIMIN-GADO RMG KN KWARA 9 IJEBU-NORTH JGB OG 30 OYO-EAST YYY OY YOBE 1 Stanbic IBTC Pension Managers Limited 0021 29 URU OFFONG ORUKO UFG AK 7 DAMBOA DAM BO 9 ETSAKO-WEST AUC ED 21 ORLU RLU IM 33 ROGO RGG KN S/N LGA NAME LGA STATE 10 IJEBU-NORTH-EAST JNE OG 31 SAKI-EAST GMD OY S/N LGA NAME LGA STATE 2 Premium Pension Limited 0022 30 URUAN DUU AK 8 DIKWA DKW BO 10 IGUEBEN GUE ED 22 ORSU AWT IM 34 SHANONO SNN KN CODE CODE 11 IJEBU-ODE JBD OG 32 SAKI-WEST SHK OY CODE CODE 3 Leadway Pensure PFA Limited 0023 31 UYO UYY AK 9 GUBIO GUB BO 11 IKPOBA-OKHA DGE ED 23 ORU-EAST MMA IM 35 SUMAILA SML KN 1 ASA AFN KW 12 IKENNE KNN OG 33 SURULERE RSD OY 1 BADE GSH YB 4 Sigma Pensions Limited 0024 10 GUZAMALA GZM BO 12 OREDO BEN ED 24 ORU-WEST NGB IM 36 TAKAI TAK KN 2 BARUTEN KSB KW 13 IMEKO-AFON MEK OG 2 BOSARI DPH YB 5 Pensions Alliance Limited 0025 ANAMBRA 11 GWOZA GZA BO 13 ORHIONMWON ABD ED 25 OWERRI-MUNICIPAL WER IM 37 TARAUNI TRN KN 3 EDU LAF KW 14 IPOKIA PKA OG PLATEAU 3 DAMATURU DTR YB 6 ARM Pension Managers Limited 0026 S/N LGA NAME LGA STATE 12 HAWUL HWL BO 14 OVIA-NORTH-EAST AKA ED 26 26 OWERRI-NORTH RRT IM 38 TOFA TEA KN 4 EKITI ARP KW 15 OBAFEMI OWODE WDE OG S/N LGA NAME LGA STATE 4 FIKA FKA YB 7 Trustfund Pensions Plc 0028 CODE CODE 13 JERE JRE BO 15 OVIA-SOUTH-WEST GBZ ED 27 27 OWERRI-WEST UMG IM 39 TSANYAWA TYW KN 5 IFELODUN SHA KW 16 ODEDAH DED OG CODE CODE 5 FUNE FUN YB 8 First Guarantee Pension Limited 0029 1 AGUATA AGU AN 14 KAGA KGG BO 16 OWAN-EAST
    [Show full text]
  • (Nigeria) As the Growth Centre of Jigawa State A.A Jolaoye, Garba I.A
    International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 10, Issue 2, February-2019 300 ISSN 2229-5518 An Investigation into the Performance of Dutse (Nigeria) as the Growth Centre of Jigawa State A.A Jolaoye, Garba I.A Abstract— This paper seeks to investigate some key elements of a growth centre; the principle upon which local government headquarters and state capitals creation rest. It attempts to consider in a spatial dimension, the different channels by which the establishment and development of Dutse (Nigeria) has affected its’ region (the rest major settlements in the state) after twenty-seven years of operation. The paper categorized the effects into three distinct classes: direct, indirect and induced effects. The study area is Dutse Capital, Jigawa state, Nigeria. Particular issues considered are related to population movement, (migration and commuting), industrial linkages/interference, labour recruitment and shopping patterns. Primary data was gathered through closed- ended questionnaires administered to the city’s dwellers, the industrialists and their employees for the various aspect of the study. Descriptive analysis was adopted while presentation of the findings was done with charts and tables. The study reveals that the recruitment of labour has had some pronounced effects on the settlements in the region/state. That notwithstanding, industrial linkage and the gener- ation of economic activities is limited to Dutse itself. In other words, these effects have not appreciably affected the towns and villages in the state. The trickle-down effects of the growth centre have not manifested to a stage reliable enough to sustain economic growth in the state under the investigation Index Terms— Growth centre, region, population movement, industrial linkage, the trickle-down effect.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Stakeholders Review & Validation Workshop on The
    REPORT OF THE STAKEHOLDERS REVIEW & VALIDATION WORKSHOP ON THE AMENDED CHILDREN & YOUNG PERSONS BILL HELD AT MDI, DUTSE 20TH & 21ST JUNE 2016 JULY 2016 JULY 2016 Author: Aishatu Suleiman Jahun Co-ordinator VOICES4JUSTICE(V4J) Executive Director BABA AZIMI FOUNDATION (BAF) Voices4Justice/SavetheChildren Report on the Stakeholders Review & Validation (1st Segment)Workshop on the amended CYL Bill Dutse 20-21 June 2016 CONTENT PAGE Abbreviations 2 Acknowledgement 3 1. Introduction and Background 4 2. Opening session 5 3. Presentation sessions 5 4. Comments, observations and questions 7 5. Advocacy strategy 10 6. Closing session 10 7. Challenges 11 8. Conclusion 11 9. The way forward for V4J 11 Appendices: 13 Annex A: Workshop agenda 13 Annex B: List of Participants 14 Annex C: Draft Jigawa state Children & Young Persons Amendment Bill 15 2016 Abbreviations: ADEF Arewa Development and Empowerment Foundation BAF Baba Azimi Foundation CON Change Organization Nigeria CPN Child Protection Network DCR Deputy Chief Registrar FOSADD HC High Court JGCOU Jigawa State Council of Ulama JICOWA JSLRC Justice Sector & Law Reform Commission HOA House of Assembly HOS Head of Service MODEV Mothers for Development MOE Ministry of Education MOH Ministry of Health MOI Ministry of Information MOJ Ministry of Justice MWASD Ministry of Women Affairs and Social Development MULAN Muslim Lawyers Association of Nigeria NBA Nigerian Bar Association NPFJG Nigerian Police Force Jigawa command PADAC Partnerships for Development Action PMP Project Monitoring Project SC Save
    [Show full text]
  • MDSC MENINGITIS WEEKLY BULLETIN Regional Office for Africa
    MDSC MENINGITIS WEEKLY BULLETIN Regional Office for Africa Bulletin Hebdomadaire de retro-information sur la méningite cérébrospinale Weekly feedback bulletin on cerebrospinal meningitis Semaine/Week 17, 2006 I. SITUATION EPIDEMIOLOGIQUE DE LA SEMAINE 17 2006 EPIDEMIOLOGICAL SITUATION OF WEEK 17 2006 Tableau/ Table 1 : Situation épidémiologique de la semaine 17 (24 au 30 avril 2006)/ Epidemiological Situation week 17 (April 24 - 30, 2006) Létalité District District en Complét. Autres Pays Cas Décès NmA NmW135 Pneumo Hib (%) en Alerte Epidémie (%) Nm District in District in Complet Country Case Death Letality NmA NmW135 Other Nm Pneumo Hib Alert Epdemic (%) Benin 3 2 66.7 0 0 97.4 - - - - - Burkina Faso 1185 51 4.3 7 13 100.0 11 0 0 0 0 Cameroun - - - - - Centrafrique - - - - - Cote d'Ivoire 10 1 10.0 0 0 35.4 - - - - - Ethiopia - - - - - Ghana - - - - - Guinée - - - - - Mali 37 5 13.5 0 0 86.6 5 0 0 2 0 Niger 357 32 9.0 3 2 100.0 51 0 19 1 0 Nigeria 501 44 8.7 7 9 - - - - - - **RD Congo 99 16 16.2 - - 13.2 - - - - - Tchad 116 16 13.8 4 0 86.8 13 0 0 3 1 Togo Total 2308 166 7.1 21 24 86.5 80 19 6 1 - : Non disponible / Not available * Identification par / identification by: PCR, LATEX, CULTURE ** Définition des seuils d’alerte/épidémique non applicable à ce pays situé en dehors de la ceinture de la méningite Definition of alert/epidemic thresholds not applicable to this country outside the meningitis belt Commentaires : Comments: Burkina Faso : 13 districts restent toujours en épidémie et 6 autres en Burkina Faso : 13 districts are still in epidemic phase and 6 in alerte alert.
    [Show full text]