DOCSLIB.ORG

Election of Members of the Supervisory Board

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

1 Item 4. Election of the members of the Supervisory Board DRAFT RESOLUTION OF THE AGM: ELECT THE FOLLOWING MEMBERS TO THE SUPERVISORY BOARD: 1. ESKO TAPANI AHO SENIOR ADVISOR, EAST OFFICE OF FINNISH INDUSTRIES (INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR) 2. LEONID BOGUSLAVSKY FOUNDER AND THE GENERAL PARTNER, RTP GLOBAL (INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR) 3. HERMAN GREF CEO AND CHAIRMAN OF THE EXECUTIVE BOARD OF SBERBANK 4. BELLA ZLATKIS DEPUTY CHAIRMAN OF THE EXECUTIVE BOARD OF SBERBANK 5. SERGEY IGNATIEV ADVISOR TO THE GOVERNOR OF THE BANK OF RUSSIA 6. MICHAEL KOVALCHUK PRESIDENT OF NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTRE (NRC) KURCHATOV INSTITUTE (INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR) 7. VLADIMIR KOLYCHEV DEPUTY MINISTER OF FINANCE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION 8. NIKOLAY KUDRYAVTSEV RECTOR OF MOSCOW INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS AND TECHNOLOGY (NATIONAL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY) (INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR) 9. ALEKSANDER KULESHOV PRESIDENT OF SKOLKOVO INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR) 10. GENNADY MELIKYAN HONORED ECONOMIST OF THE EMERITUS OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION (INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR) 11. MAKSIM ORESHKIN AIDE TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION 12. ANTON SILUANOV MINISTER OF FINANCE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION 13. DMITRY CHERNYSHENKO DEPUTY CHAIRMAN OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION 14. NADYA CHRISTINA WELLS INDEPENDENT INVESTMENT AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE CONSULTANT (INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR) www.sberbank.com ITEM 4. ELECTION OF THE MEMBERS OF THE SUPERVISORY BOARD 2 Explanatory note on the matter: about their withdrawal from election to the Candidates for the Supervisory Board of the there were no grounds for deeming the Supervisory Board of the Bank and revocation Bank shall have impeccable business and per- candidates unit for their professional In accordance with Federal Law No. 208-FZ of their consent for nomination and election sonal reputation and the professional knowl- qualiications, experience, personal and business reputation requirements. “On Joint-Stock Companies” dated 26 Decem- to the Supervisory Board of the Bank (both edge, skills and experience required to make ber 1995 (hereinafter, the Law), the Annual candidates had been included in the List of decisions falling in the remit of the Supervi- General Meeting of Shareholders of the Bank Candidates to the Supervisory Board on the sory Board. Independent directors shall make The Committee believes that seven of the is required to consider the matter of electing suggestion of the Bank of Russia). up at least 1/3 of the Supervisory Board. candidates under consideration can be members of the Bank’s Supervisory Board. granted the status of Independent Directors. As in accordance with the Charter, the Super- The HR and Remuneration Committee of the Supervisory Board, with the assistance of the Pursuant to Clause 9.10. of the Bank’s Char- visory Board must consist of 14 members, A member of (a candidate to) the Supervisory 1 Bank's Corporate Secretary, has assessed ter, shareholders (a shareholder) holding in the Supervisory Board at the meeting on Board can be deemed independent if he/she aggregate at least two percent of the voting 21/08/2020 resolved to amend the List of the candidates nominated to the Supervisory Board for compliance with: meets the following criteria: no association shares are entitled to nominate candidates to Candidates for election to the Supervisory with Sberbank, the Bank of Russia, a substan- the Supervisory Board no later than 75 days Board at the AGM as follows: • Federal Law No. 395-1 “On Banks and tial counterparty/competitor of Sberbank, or after the end of the reporting year (for AGM — remove V. Goreglyad and N. Ivanova from the government. 2020—on or before 16 March 2020). Banking Activities” dated 02/12/1990 (com- the List of Candidates pliance of the candidates with the require- — include the following candidates in the List ments for business reputation) At the same time, the Supervisory Board can The resolutions of the Supervisory Board of consider a director to be independent despite the Bank dated 17/03/2020 (Minutes No. 5 of Candidates: V. Kolychev (Deputy Minis- • Moscow Exchange Listing Rules (candidates ter of Finance of the Russian Federation) the fact that he/she meets formal association dtd. 17/03/2020) and 27/03/2020 (Minutes No. claiming independence status must meet criteria if the Supervisory Board believes that 6 dtd. 27/03/2020) created a List of Candi- and D. Chernyshenko (Deputy Prime Min- the independence criteria—for the Bank’s ister of the Russian Federation); both can- such association does not afect such person’s dates for election to the Supervisory Board of shares to be on the top quotation list of the ability to make independent and objective the Bank at the Annual General Meeting of didates were suggested by the Supervisory stock exchange) Board members. judgments in good faith. Shareholders of the Bank on 2019 performance • the Supervisory Board’s needs for additional (hereinafter, the AGM) based on the propos- Members of the Bank's Supervisory Board competencies (for the purpose of succession als submitted by the Bank of Russia, minority in the Supervisory Board’s membership) shareholders, and the Supervisory Board. are elected by the General Meeting of Share- holders via cumulative voting for a term until the next Annual General Meeting of Following the assessment of all the In June 2020, the Supervisory Board received candidates, the Supervisory Board's HR and Shareholders. statements from V. Goreglyad and N. Ivanova Remuneration Committee determined that 1 As per Clause 7 Article 53 of the Law, along with candidates proposed by shareholders for forming the relevant body, the board of directors (supervisory board) of a company may act at its own discretion when adding issues on the agenda of the general meeting of shareholders and (or) including candidates in the list of candidates for election to the relevant body of the company. www.sberbank.com 1 Item 4 Information on Candidates to the Supervisory Board of Sberbank 1. ESKO TAPANI AHO (INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR) At present: • 2013–2019: Executive Chairman of the There are no grounds to acknowledge that • Member of the Supervisory Board Board, East Oice of Finnish Industries the candidate does not comply with the of Sberbank requirements to professional qualiications, Membership in the management bodies experience, and personal and business • Member of the Strategic Planning of other legal entities: reputation. Committee • Chairman of the Board of Directors, • Member of the Risk Management Verbatum Committee • Member of the Board of Trustees, Yegor Year of Birth: 1954 Gaidar Heritage Foundation • Chairman of the Board of Directors, Cinia E. T. Aho was nominated to the Supervisory • Chairman of the Board of Directors, Board by a group of shareholders of the Bank Adven Oy who own over 2 percent of votes. The candidate: Education / academic degree / academic position: • owns no shares of the Bank • 1980 — University of Helsinki (Finland), • has no relations with ailiates and large Political History, Master’s Degree in Social counterparties of the Bank or kinship rela- Sciences tions with persons included in the gover- nance bodies of the Bank Work experience in the last ive years: • meets the requirements for independent directors • 2019 — present: Senior Adviser, East Oice of Finnish Industries www.sberbank.com ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON CANDIDATES TO THE SUPERVISORY BOARD OF SBERBANK 2 2. LEONID BOGUSLAVSKY (INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR) At present: Membership in the management bodies • Member of the Supervisory Board of other legal entities: of Sberbank • Chairman of the Board, ivi.ru • Member of the Strategic Planning • Member of the Board of Directors of Super Committee League Holdings Pte. LTD • Member of the HR and Remuneration • Member of the Board of Directors of JSC Committee AC Rus Media • Member of the Information Technology Committee The candidate: • owns no shares of the Bank 1951 Year of Birth: • has no relations with ailiates and large counterparties of the Bank or kinship rela- L. Boguslavsky was nominated to the Super- tions with persons included in the gover- visory Board by a group of shareholders of the nance bodies of the Bank Bank who own over 2 percent of votes. • meets the requirements for independent Education / academic degree / academic directors position: There are no grounds to acknowledge that • 1973 — Moscow State University of Railway the candidate does not comply with the Engineering, Applied Mathematics, requirements to professional qualiications, Engineer/Mathematician experience, and personal and business • 1996 — Doctor of Engineering Science reputation. Work experience in the last ive years: • one of the major Russian investors in Inter- net- and IT-companies; founder and general partner of RTP Global funds www.sberbank.com ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON CANDIDATES TO THE SUPERVISORY BOARD OF SBERBANK 3 3. HERMAN GREF (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR) At present: • Order of Honor for Strategic Initiatives to Promote New • Member of the Supervisory Board • Order of Alexander Nevsky Projects of Sberbank • Stolypin Medal Class 2 • Member of the Board, Association of Banks • Member of the Strategic Planning of Russia • Certiicate of Honor from the President Committee of the Russian Federation • Member of the Board of Directors, Public Limited Liability Company Yandex Naam- • Order of Holy Prince Daniel of Moscow 1st Year of Birth: 1964 loze Vennootschap Class • Member of the Supervisory Board, Autono- H. Gref was nominated to the Supervisory • Oicer of the Legion of Honor (The highest mous Nonproit
Recommended publications
  • G20 UPDATE E-NEWSLETTER Issue #17 - October 2013

    G20 UPDATE E-NEWSLETTER Issue #17 - October 2013

    subscribeasdf aklsd jflksdj to the flksdjnewsletter flsdkj flksdj df f d f d fd fdfsssflsdjfldsjf lkdsj(click flksdj fklsdjhere) flksdj flkdsjf lksdjf lksdfj G20 UPDATE E-NEWSLETTER Issue #17 - October 2013 2012 2013 2014 CC BY-SA 2.0 (kurt) CC BY-SA 2.0 (LHOON) Reflections on the Summit Must Read In “Investment in the In “Building on mixed In “The G20 St. In “Reflections from the --Insights from the Future: Preliminary success – from St Petersburg Summit – 2013 Russian G20 BRICS results of Russia’s G20 Petersburg 2013 to Bubbles, Casinos and Summit,” Michael --News from “Down Presidency,” Brisbane 2014,” Nancy Inactivity,” Sameer Switow, Global Council of Under” O. Buklemishev, Associate Waites, Head of Policy Dossani, Advocacy the Global Call to Action --New Think Tank professor at the Economics Research & Government Coordinator, Reshaping Against Poverty (GCAP), Publications Department of Moscow Relations, World Vision Global Power, Action Aid reviews highlights of the State University and Australia, provides a view International describes G20 Summit as they relate member of the Expert of the Russian G20 Summit-related issues, to: international Council for the Russian G20 Summit and the transition such as the currency development, remittances, Presidency, provides an in- to the Australian crises and tax reform. infrastructure, gender, and depth report of the G20’s Presidency. tax avoidance. strengths, weaknesses, and tensions in promoting economic recovery. Pages 3-5 Pages 6-8 Pages 9-11 Pages 12-14 Pages 8 | 14 | 15 a UPDATE Introduction Highlights of the Russian G20 Summit Introduction G20 Nancy Alexander, Heinrich Böll Foundation - North America At the September 2013 G20 Summit Arguably, the Summit’s main Buklemishev, the U.S.
  • Russland- Analysen

    Russland- Analysen

    NR. 322 07.10.2016 russland- analysen http://www.laender-analysen.de/russland/ BEWEGUNG IN DER RUSSISCHEN POLITIK? ■■ ANALYSE ■■ DOKUMENTATION Russland im Herbst 2016. Dumawahlen und Ein Meinungsforschungsinstitut als Regimeumbau 2 »ausländischer Agent«. Reaktionen auf die Hans-Henning Schröder, Bremen Einstufung des Lewada-Zentrums durch das ■■ TABELLEN ZUM TEXT russische Justizministerium 25 Wahlbeteiligung 6 Stellungnahme des Direktors des Levada-Zentrums Lev Gudkov 25 ■■ UMFRAGE Chronik der Ereignisse 27 Fairness bei den Dumawahlen 10 Erklärung der deutschen Osteuropaforschung 29 Alltagssorgen der Russen 11 ■■ ANALYSE ■■ RANKING Ordnung der Macht Russen auf der Forbesliste der Milliardäre im Die Generation Anton Wainos und Russlands September 2016 30 techno-bürokratischer Autoritarismus 13 ■■ CHRONIK Fabian Burkhardt, München 21. September – 6. Oktober 2016 33 ■■ AUS RUSSISCHEN BLOGS Wahlmanipulation ohne Folgen? 20 Sergey Medvedev, Berlin/Moskau ■■ NOTIZEN AUS MOSKAU Dumawahlennachlese 22 Jens Siegert, Moskau ► Deutsche Gesellschaft Forschungsstelle Osteuropa Zentrum für Osteuropa- und internationale Studien Centre for East European and International Studies für Osteuropakunde e.V. an der Universität Bremen in Gründung Die Russland-Analysen werden unterstützt von RUSSLAND-ANALYSEN NR. 322, 07.10.2016 2 ANALYSE Russland im Herbst 2016 Dumawahlen und Regimeumbau Hans-Henning Schröder, Bremen Zusammenfassung Die Dumawahlen im September 2016 haben gezeigt, dass die »Machtvertikale« funktioniert und die Füh- rung den politischen Prozess im Lande unter Kontrolle hat. Allerdings sind die Finanz- und Wirtschafts- probleme ungelöst. Dementsprechend kann die Führung der Bevölkerung auf lange Sicht die soziale Sta- bilität nicht garantieren. In dieser Situation, in der die Administration den politischen Prozess kontrolliert, aber befürchtet, dass die ökonomischen und sozialen Probleme überhand nehmen, beginnt das Putinsche Zentrum den Apparat umzubauen.
  • The BRICS and Asia, Currency Internationalization and International Monetary Reform the Russian Federation

    The BRICS and Asia, Currency Internationalization and International Monetary Reform the Russian Federation

    THE BRICS AND ASIA, CURRENCY INTERNATIONALIZATION AND INTERNATIONAL MONETARY REFORM PAPer No. 4 — JuNE 2013 The Russian Federation: International Monetary Reform and Currency Internationalization Juliet Johnson THE BRICS AND ASIA, CURRENCY INTERNATIONALIZATION AND INTERNATIONAL MONETARY REFORM PAPer No. 4 — JuNE 2013 The Russian Federation: International Monetary Reform and Currency Internationalization Juliet Johnson Copyright © 2013 by the Asian Development Bank, The Centre for International Governance Innovation and the Hong Kong Institute for Monetary Research. Published by the Asian Development Bank, The Centre for International Governance Innovation and the Hong Kong Institute for Monetary Research. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Centre for International Governance Innovation or its Operating Board of Directors or International Board of Governors. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect those of the Hong Kong Institute for Monetary Research, its Council of Advisers, or the Board of Directors.
  • Of the Conventional Wisdom

    Of the Conventional Wisdom

    M ASSAC H US E TTS INSTITUT E O F T E C H NO L O G Y M ASSAC H US E TTS INSTITUT E O F T E C H NO L O G Y December 2007 M IT Ce NT er F O R I NT er NATIONA L S TU D I E S 07-22 of the Conventional Wisdom Russia: An Energy Superpower? Carol R. Saivetz MIT Center for International Studies s Vladimir Putin nears the end of his second term as Russian Apresident, it is clear that energy exports have become a major component of a resurgent Russia’s foreign policy. According to the conventional wisdom, Russia’s vast resources make it a superpower to be reckoned with. Not only is it a major supplier of natural gas to the states of the former Soviet Union, it sells oil and natural gas to Europe and it has made new contract commitments for both oil and gas to China. Additionally, as the January 2006 cut-off of gas to Ukraine, the January 2007 oil and gas cut-off to Belarus, and Gazprom’s threat (again) to Ukraine in the wake of the September 2007 parliamentary elections indicate, Russia is willing to use its resources for political purposes. The conventional wisdom continues that none of this is surprising. Putin acceded to the Russian presidency resolved to restore Russia’s superpower status and to use energy Center for International Studies to that end. The Russian Federation’s Energy Strategy, dated August 28, 2003, formally Massachusetts Institute of Technology Building E38-200 states that Russia’s natural resources should be a fundamental element in Moscow’s diplo- 292 Main Street macy and that Russia’s position in global energy markets should be strengthened.1 In his Cambridge, MA 02139 own dissertation, Putin argued that the energy sector should be guided by the state and T: 617.253.8093 used to promote Russia’s national interests.2 And, the rector of the Mining Institute in F: 617.253.9330 which Putin wrote his dissertation and currently one of his energy advisors wrote: “In the [email protected] specific circumstances the world finds itself in today, the most important resources are web.mit.edu/cis/ hydrocarbons .
  • Market News Company News SECURITIES MARKET NEWS

    Market News Company News SECURITIES MARKET NEWS

    SSEECCUURRIIITTIIIEESS MMAARRKKEETT NNEEWWSSLLEETTTTEERR weekly Presented by: VTB Bank, Custody January 21, 2021 Issue No. 2021/02 Market News Finance Ministry fully places RUB 20 bln OFZ bonds On January 20, 2021 Russia’s Finance Ministry said in a statement that it hd fully placed RUB 20 bln of OFZ 26234 bonds with a fixed coupon maturing in July 2025 at an auction on January 20. The cut-off rate amounted to 96.0801% and the weighted average rate stood at 96.162%. The cut-off yield stood at 5.57% and the weighted average yield at 5.55%. Demand for the bonds totaled RUB 38.97 bln. Company News Rosseti terminates CEO Livinsky, appoints Lenenergo CEO Ryumin On January 16, 2021 it was disclosed by reporters that Russian state power grid holding Rosseti had terminated powers of CEO Pavel Livinsky ahead of schedule, and appointed Andrei Ryumin, CEO of the company’s subsidiary Rosseti Lenenergo, as the company’s acting CEO. In its turn, the board of directors of Rosseti Lenenergo has terminated the powers of Ryumin ahead of schedule and appointed Chief Engineer Igor Kyuzmin as the company’s acting CEO. Livinsky was elected as the CEO of Rosseti in September 2017. Earlier in January, Kommersant business daily reported quoting sources that the government may appoint Livinsky as a head of an energy department that would be created in the framework of an administrative reform. Cherkizovo Group board again approves offering of 10.3 mln shares On January 17, 2021 it was stated that the board of directors of Russian meat producer Cherkizovo Group had again approved a public offering of 10.262 mln additional shares at a meeting that had took place on January 16.
  • 8-11 July 2021 Venice - Italy

    8-11 July 2021 Venice - Italy

    3RD G20 FINANCE MINISTERS AND CENTRAL BANK GOVERNORS MEETING AND SIDE EVENTS 8-11 July 2021 Venice - Italy 1 CONTENTS 1 ABOUT THE G20 Pag. 3 2 ITALIAN G20 PRESIDENCY Pag. 4 3 2021 G20 FINANCE MINISTERS AND CENTRAL BANK GOVERNORS MEETINGS Pag. 4 4 3RD G20 FINANCE MINISTERS AND CENTRAL BANK GOVERNORS MEETING Pag. 6 Agenda Participants 5 MEDIA Pag. 13 Accreditation Media opportunities Media centre - Map - Operating hours - Facilities and services - Media liaison officers - Information technology - Interview rooms - Host broadcaster and photographer - Venue access Host city: Venice Reach and move in Venice - Airport - Trains - Public transports - Taxi Accomodation Climate & time zone Accessibility, special requirements and emergency phone numbers 6 COVID-19 PROCEDURE Pag. 26 7 CONTACTS Pag. 26 2 1 ABOUT THE G20 Population Economy Trade 60% of the world population 80 of global GDP 75% of global exports The G20 is the international forum How the G20 works that brings together the world’s major The G20 does not have a permanent economies. Its members account for more secretariat: its agenda and activities are than 80% of world GDP, 75% of global trade established by the rotating Presidencies, in and 60% of the population of the planet. cooperation with the membership. The forum has met every year since 1999 A “Troika”, represented by the country that and includes, since 2008, a yearly Summit, holds the Presidency, its predecessor and with the participation of the respective its successor, works to ensure continuity Heads of State and Government. within the G20. The Troika countries are currently Saudi Arabia, Italy and Indonesia.
  • Decision of the IOC Executive Board

    Decision of the IOC Executive Board

    Decision of the IOC Executive Board The IOC Executive Board (EB) today deliberated on the findings of the Schmid Commission addressing the systematic manipulation of the anti-doping system in Russia prior to this decision. The Commission’s report also addresses the manipulation of the anti-doping laboratory at the Olympic Winter Games Sochi 2014, which targeted the Olympic Games directly. The EB approved the Commission’s report. Now that due process has been followed, and the right to be heard has been granted, the EB, following the recommendations of the Schmid Commission, took the following decisions: I. To suspend the Russian Olympic Committee (ROC) with immediate effect. II. To invite individual Russian athletes to the Olympic Winter Games PyeongChang 2018 according to the following guidelines: 1. The invitation list will be determined, at its absolute discretion, by a panel chaired by Valerie Fourneyron, Chair of the ITA. The panel will include members of the Pre-Games Testing Task Force: one appointed by WADA, one by the DFSU and one by the IOC, Dr Richard Budgett. 2. This panel will be guided in its decisions by the following principles: a) It can only consider athletes who have qualified according to the qualification standards of their respective sports. b) Athletes must be considered clean to the satisfaction of this panel: - Athletes must not have been disqualified or declared ineligible for any Anti-Doping Rule Violation. - Athletes must have undergone all the pre-Games targeted tests recommended by the Pre-Games Testing Task Force. - Athletes must have undergone any other testing requirements specified by the panel to ensure a level playing field.
  • US Sanctions on Russia

    US Sanctions on Russia

    U.S. Sanctions on Russia Updated January 17, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45415 SUMMARY R45415 U.S. Sanctions on Russia January 17, 2020 Sanctions are a central element of U.S. policy to counter and deter malign Russian behavior. The United States has imposed sanctions on Russia mainly in response to Russia’s 2014 invasion of Cory Welt, Coordinator Ukraine, to reverse and deter further Russian aggression in Ukraine, and to deter Russian Specialist in European aggression against other countries. The United States also has imposed sanctions on Russia in Affairs response to (and to deter) election interference and other malicious cyber-enabled activities, human rights abuses, the use of a chemical weapon, weapons proliferation, illicit trade with North Korea, and support to Syria and Venezuela. Most Members of Congress support a robust Kristin Archick Specialist in European use of sanctions amid concerns about Russia’s international behavior and geostrategic intentions. Affairs Sanctions related to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine are based mainly on four executive orders (EOs) that President Obama issued in 2014. That year, Congress also passed and President Rebecca M. Nelson Obama signed into law two acts establishing sanctions in response to Russia’s invasion of Specialist in International Ukraine: the Support for the Sovereignty, Integrity, Democracy, and Economic Stability of Trade and Finance Ukraine Act of 2014 (SSIDES; P.L. 113-95/H.R. 4152) and the Ukraine Freedom Support Act of 2014 (UFSA; P.L. 113-272/H.R. 5859). Dianne E. Rennack Specialist in Foreign Policy In 2017, Congress passed and President Trump signed into law the Countering Russian Influence Legislation in Europe and Eurasia Act of 2017 (CRIEEA; P.L.
  • Annual Report 2018 ABOUT THIS REPORT 02

    Annual Report 2018 ABOUT THIS REPORT 02

    AnnuAl RepoRt 2018 ABOUT THIS REPORT 02 1 / 2 ABOUT THIS REPORT Approach to the Report Boundaries of the Report Approval of the Report This Annual Report of Sberbank of Russia ¹ for 2018 (the “Report”) The financial data are presented in the Report Information on sustainable development is consoli- This Report received preliminary approv- in accordance with the IFRS consolidated financial dated by the major participants of the Group, which al by the Supervisory Board of Sberbank includes the performance results of Sberbank and its subsidiaries ² statements, unless otherwise specified in the text of have a significant impact on their regions of pres- (Minutes No. 11 of April 16, 2019). for the reporting period from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2018. the Report. ence, and Sberbank Corporate University. The reliability of the data in the Report was con- Operational data are presented for PJSC Sberbank firmed by the Audit Committee of Sberbank. unless otherwise specified in the text of the Report. The Report has been prepared in accordance with In addition, the contents of the Report The Report was approved by the Annual General the legislation of the Russian Federation, including: comply with the following documents: Shareholder Meeting of Sberbank as of May 24, 2019 (Minutes No 32 as of May 29, 2019). ♦ Federal Law No. 39-FZ “On the Securities ♦ Requirements of the Moscow Stock The term “Group” as used in the sections “People: Nurturing New Skills in Effective Teams” Market” dated April 22,1996; Exchange on the preparation of annu- and “Impact on Society” includes Sberbank Corporate University and the following: al reports by joint stock companies; ♦ Federal Law No.
  • At Crossroads Current Problems of Russia’S Gas Sector

    At Crossroads Current Problems of Russia’S Gas Sector

    63 AT CROSSROADS CURRENT PROBLEMS OF RUSSIA’S GAS SECTOR Szymon Kardaś NUMBER 63 WARSAW MARCH 2017 AT CROSSROADS CURRENT PROBLEMS OF RUSSIA’S GAS SECTOR Szymon Kardaś © Copyright by Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia / Centre for Eastern Studies CONTENT EDITOR Adam Eberhardt, Marek Menkiszak EDITOR Anna Łabuszewska CO-OPERATION Małgorzata Zarębska, Katarzyna Kazimierska TRANSLATION OSW CO-OPERATION Timothy Harrell GRAPHIC DESIGN PARA-BUCH PHOTOGRAPH ON COVER Shutterstock.com DTP GroupMedia MAP Wojciech Mańkowski PUBLISHER Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia Centre for Eastern Studies ul. Koszykowa 6a, Warsaw, Poland Phone + 48 /22/ 525 80 00 Fax: + 48 /22/ 525 80 40 osw.waw.pl ISBN 978-83-62936-98-4 Contents EXecUTIVE SUMMARY /5 INTRODUCTION /8 I. THE UPSTREAM SecTOR /11 1. Main gas production regions in Russia /11 2. Main gas producers in Russia /14 3. Stagnation in the upstream sector /18 4. Factors underlying the erosion of Gazprom’s position /20 4.1. Negative trends in export markets /20 4.2. Declining gas consumption in Russia and fiscal burdens /21 4.3. Growing competition from the so-called independent gas producers /23 5. Resource base and prospects of gas production growth /25 6. Development of domestic gas infrastructure /29 6.1. The transmission network /29 6.2. Gas storage /31 6.3. Gas processing infrastructure in Russia /31 II. THE RUSSIAN GAS SecTOR’S EXPORT STRATegY IN 2000–2016 /33 1. Objectives of the gas sector’s export strategy /33 2. Russia’s gas exports in the years 2000–2016: export destinations and volumes /34 3.
  • 2017 Annual Report About This Report

    2017 Annual Report About This Report

    2017 Annual Report About this Report Approach to the Report Disclaimer This Annual Report of Sberbank of Russia1 for 2017 (the “Report”) In addition, the Report reflects the contribution that Sberbank has This annual report is prepared by Sberbank and does not represent — in full or in includes the results of Sberbank and its subsidiaries2 for the reporting made to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals adopted by part — an offer for sale or issue, an invitation to submit offers for sale or issue, or a period from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017. the United Nations in 2015 in the document “Transforming Our World: recommendation regarding the purchase, subscription, guarantee of placement, or The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development”. other acquisition of any shares of Sberbank or any member of Sberbank Group, or • Federal Law “On the Securities Market” No. 39—FZ dated April 22, 1996; any securities representing such shares, or any other securities of said entities and • Federal Law “On Joint Stock Companies” No. 208—FZ dated shall not be interpreted as such; neither this report, any part thereof, nor the fact of December 26, 1995; This Report is prepared in accordance with the Core option its presentation or distribution shall give the grounds for any contract, obligation, or • Bank of Russia Directive “On the Deadlines and Procedure for of the Global Reporting Initiative Standards (GRI Standards). investment decision and shall not be relied upon in connection with any contract, the Preparation and Submission of the Financial Statements of Previous Sberbank reports were prepared “taking into obligation, or investment decision.
  • Russian Sanctions

    Russian Sanctions

    IMPACTDEFENDING AND EUROPE: EFFECTIVENESS:“GLOBAL BRITAIN” AND THE FUTURE OFSANCTIONS EUROPEAN ON GEOPOLITICSRUSSIA 2014–2020 BY JDRAMES ALAN ROGERS RILEY DEMOCRACY | FREEDOM | HUMAN RIGHTS DecemberReport 2020No. 2018/1 Published in 2020 by The Henry Jackson Society The Henry Jackson Society Millbank Tower 21-24 Millbank London SW1P 4QP Registered charity no. 1140489 Tel: +44 (0)20 7340 4520 www.henryjacksonsociety.org © The Henry Jackson Society, 2020. All rights reserved. Title: “IMPACT AND EFFECTIVENESS: SANCTIONS ON RUSSIA 2014–2020” By Dr Alan Riley, Senior Fellow, Atlantic Council, Washington DC ISBN: 978-1-909035-63-8 £9.95 where sold The views expressed in this publication are those of the author and are not necessarily indicative of those of The Henry Jackson Society or its Trustees. Cover image: https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/airplane-takes-off-dusk-fences-barbed-1348983533 IMPACTDEFENDING AND EUROPE: EFFECTIVENESS:“GLOBAL BRITAIN” AND THE FUTURE OFSANCTIONS EUROPEAN ON GEOPOLITICSRUSSIA 2014–2020 BY JDRAMES ALAN ROGERS RILEY, SENIOR FELLOW, ATLANTIC COUNCIL, WASHINGTON DC DEMOCRACY | FREEDOM | HUMAN RIGHTS DecemberReport 2020No. 2018/1 Impact and Effectiveness: Sanctions on Russia 2014–2020 About the Author Dr Alan Riley is a Senior Fellow at the Atlantic Council in Washington, DC. Dr Riley specialises in international commercial law, EU energy law and competition law. He is a member of the Advisory Committee of the Energy Community, which acts as the Community’s judicial panel. He was formerly a Professor of Law at the City University of London and he holds a PhD in European Union law from the Europa Institute, Edinburgh University, and is a qualified as a Solicitor of the Supreme Court of England and Wales.