DOCSLIB.ORG

2004 Official General Election Results

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

State of New Mexico Election Results Reporting Application NOTICE: This web site displays unofficial election results. Official results will not be available until after the election is audited. Valencia County Total Number of Voters: 26097 11/15/2004 9:16:28 AM Number of Precincts Reporting 37 of 37 Candidate or Issue Party Total Vote Percent Precinct 001 PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES JOHN F. KERRY and JOHN EDWARDS Democratic 507 39.2 % GEORGE W. BUSH and DICK CHENEY Republican 777 60.1 % DAVID COBB and PATRICIA LaMARCHE Green 0 0.0 % MICHAEL PEROUTKA and DR. CHUCK BALDWIN Constitution 1 0.1 % MICHAEL BADNARIK and RICHARD V. CAMPAGNA Libertarian 1 0.1 % RALPH NADER and PETER MIGUEL CAMEJO Independent 6 0.5 % UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE - DISTRICT 2 GARY K. KING Democratic 512 40.3 % STEVE PEARCE Republican 759 59.7 % JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT EDWARD L. CHAVEZ Democratic 630 51.1 % NED S. FULLER Republican 603 48.9 % JUDGE OF THE COURT OF APPEALS MICHAEL E. VIGIL Democratic 636 51.3 % PAUL D. BARBER Republican 603 48.7 % STATE SENATOR - DISTRICT 29 MICHAEL S. SANCHEZ Democratic 714 56.8 % ABRAN D. GABALDON Republican 544 43.2 % STATE REPRESENTATIVE - DISTRICT 8 FRED LUNA Democratic 569 45.1 % JACKIE FARNSWORTH Republican 694 54.9 % DISTRICT JUDGE - 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICT, DIVISION 2 GEORGE P. EICHWALD Democratic 616 50.2 % STANLEY A. READ Republican 612 49.8 % DISTRICT JUDGE - 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICT, DIVISION 6 VIOLET C. OTERO Democratic 893 100.0 % DISTRICT ATTORNEY - 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICT LEMUEL L. MARTINEZ Democratic 603 48.6 % PETER A. ROSS Republican 639 51.4 % COUNTY CLERK TINA R. GALLEGOS Democratic 750 59.6 % ROBERT J. BORAM Republican 508 40.4 % Printed on: 11/15/2004 Page 1 of 73 Valencia County Total Number of Voters: 26097 11/15/2004 9:16:28 AM Number of Precincts Reporting 37 of 37 Candidate or Issue Party Total Vote Percent Precinct 001 COUNTY TREASURER DIANA MARTINEZ-COPLEN Democratic 665 53.3 % LORELL CAMPBELL Republican 583 46.7 % Shall RICHARD C. BOSSON be retained as a Justice of the Supreme Court? NO 260 24.9 % YES 783 75.1 % Shall RODERICK T. KENNEDY be retained as a Judge of the Court of Appeals? NO 244 23.3 % YES 805 76.7 % CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT 3 AGAINST 372 32.5 % FOR 771 67.5 % CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT 4 AGAINST 294 24.3 % FOR 916 75.7 % CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT 5 AGAINST 305 26.1 % FOR 864 73.9 % BOND QUESTION A AGAINST 419 35.9 % FOR 748 64.1 % BOND QUESTION B AGAINST 473 40.2 % FOR 703 59.8 % BOND QUESTION C AGAINST 433 36.9 % FOR 739 63.1 % BOND QUESTION D AGAINST 432 36.9 % FOR 738 63.1 % Printed on: 11/15/2004 Page 2 of 73 Valencia County Total Number of Voters: 26097 11/15/2004 9:16:28 AM Number of Precincts Reporting 37 of 37 Candidate or Issue Party Total Vote Percent Precinct 002 PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES JOHN F. KERRY and JOHN EDWARDS Democratic 536 50.6 % GEORGE W. BUSH and DICK CHENEY Republican 508 47.9 % DAVID COBB and PATRICIA LaMARCHE Green 3 0.3 % MICHAEL PEROUTKA and DR. CHUCK BALDWIN Constitution 0 0.0 % MICHAEL BADNARIK and RICHARD V. CAMPAGNA Libertarian 3 0.3 % RALPH NADER and PETER MIGUEL CAMEJO Independent 10 0.9 % UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE - DISTRICT 2 GARY K. KING Democratic 532 51.0 % STEVE PEARCE Republican 511 49.0 % JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT EDWARD L. CHAVEZ Democratic 653 64.1 % NED S. FULLER Republican 365 35.9 % JUDGE OF THE COURT OF APPEALS MICHAEL E. VIGIL Democratic 657 64.2 % PAUL D. BARBER Republican 367 35.8 % STATE SENATOR - DISTRICT 29 MICHAEL S. SANCHEZ Democratic 699 67.8 % ABRAN D. GABALDON Republican 332 32.2 % STATE REPRESENTATIVE - DISTRICT 8 FRED LUNA Democratic 586 56.1 % JACKIE FARNSWORTH Republican 458 43.9 % DISTRICT JUDGE - 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICT, DIVISION 2 GEORGE P. EICHWALD Democratic 654 63.8 % STANLEY A. READ Republican 371 36.2 % DISTRICT JUDGE - 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICT, DIVISION 6 VIOLET C. OTERO Democratic 838 100.0 % DISTRICT ATTORNEY - 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICT LEMUEL L. MARTINEZ Democratic 622 59.8 % PETER A. ROSS Republican 418 40.2 % COUNTY CLERK TINA R. GALLEGOS Democratic 733 70.9 % ROBERT J. BORAM Republican 301 29.1 % COUNTY TREASURER DIANA MARTINEZ-COPLEN Democratic 666 64.8 % LORELL CAMPBELL Republican 362 35.2 % Shall RICHARD C. BOSSON be retained as a Justice of the Supreme Court? NO 234 26.1 % YES 662 73.9 % Shall RODERICK T. KENNEDY be retained as a Judge of the Court of Appeals? NO 194 21.2 % YES 719 78.8 % Printed on: 11/15/2004 Page 3 of 73 Valencia County Total Number of Voters: 26097 11/15/2004 9:16:28 AM Number of Precincts Reporting 37 of 37 Candidate or Issue Party Total Vote Percent Precinct 002 CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT 3 AGAINST 335 35.4 % FOR 611 64.6 % CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT 4 AGAINST 253 25.9 % FOR 725 74.1 % CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT 5 AGAINST 296 30.6 % FOR 672 69.4 % BOND QUESTION A AGAINST 351 36.8 % FOR 603 63.2 % BOND QUESTION B AGAINST 408 43.1 % FOR 539 56.9 % BOND QUESTION C AGAINST 413 43.4 % FOR 538 56.6 % BOND QUESTION D AGAINST 353 36.9 % FOR 603 63.1 % Printed on: 11/15/2004 Page 4 of 73 Valencia County Total Number of Voters: 26097 11/15/2004 9:16:28 AM Number of Precincts Reporting 37 of 37 Candidate or Issue Party Total Vote Percent Precinct 003 PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES JOHN F. KERRY and JOHN EDWARDS Democratic 234 43.3 % GEORGE W. BUSH and DICK CHENEY Republican 300 55.5 % DAVID COBB and PATRICIA LaMARCHE Green 0 0.0 % MICHAEL PEROUTKA and DR. CHUCK BALDWIN Constitution 0 0.0 % MICHAEL BADNARIK and RICHARD V. CAMPAGNA Libertarian 1 0.2 % RALPH NADER and PETER MIGUEL CAMEJO Independent 6 1.1 % UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE - DISTRICT 2 GARY K. KING Democratic 236 44.3 % STEVE PEARCE Republican 297 55.7 % JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT EDWARD L. CHAVEZ Democratic 318 59.9 % NED S. FULLER Republican 213 40.1 % JUDGE OF THE COURT OF APPEALS MICHAEL E. VIGIL Democratic 313 59.6 % PAUL D. BARBER Republican 212 40.4 % STATE SENATOR - DISTRICT 29 MICHAEL S. SANCHEZ Democratic 347 64.9 % ABRAN D. GABALDON Republican 188 35.1 % STATE REPRESENTATIVE - DISTRICT 8 FRED LUNA Democratic 307 57.6 % JACKIE FARNSWORTH Republican 226 42.4 % DISTRICT JUDGE - 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICT, DIVISION 2 GEORGE P. EICHWALD Democratic 312 59.8 % STANLEY A. READ Republican 210 40.2 % DISTRICT JUDGE - 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICT, DIVISION 6 VIOLET C. OTERO Democratic 410 100.0 % DISTRICT ATTORNEY - 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICT LEMUEL L. MARTINEZ Democratic 302 57.4 % PETER A. ROSS Republican 224 42.6 % COUNTY CLERK TINA R. GALLEGOS Democratic 348 65.4 % ROBERT J. BORAM Republican 184 34.6 % COUNTY TREASURER DIANA MARTINEZ-COPLEN Democratic 311 59.5 % LORELL CAMPBELL Republican 212 40.5 % Shall RICHARD C. BOSSON be retained as a Justice of the Supreme Court? NO 108 24.2 % YES 339 75.8 % Shall RODERICK T. KENNEDY be retained as a Judge of the Court of Appeals? NO 107 23.8 % YES 343 76.2 % Printed on: 11/15/2004 Page 5 of 73 Valencia County Total Number of Voters: 26097 11/15/2004 9:16:28 AM Number of Precincts Reporting 37 of 37 Candidate or Issue Party Total Vote Percent Precinct 003 CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT 3 AGAINST 164 34.5 % FOR 312 65.5 % CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT 4 AGAINST 133 26.4 % FOR 370 73.6 % CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT 5 AGAINST 168 33.9 % FOR 328 66.1 % BOND QUESTION A AGAINST 179 36.0 % FOR 318 64.0 % BOND QUESTION B AGAINST 209 42.1 % FOR 288 57.9 % BOND QUESTION C AGAINST 207 41.2 % FOR 295 58.8 % BOND QUESTION D AGAINST 191 37.7 % FOR 315 62.3 % Printed on: 11/15/2004 Page 6 of 73 Valencia County Total Number of Voters: 26097 11/15/2004 9:16:28 AM Number of Precincts Reporting 37 of 37 Candidate or Issue Party Total Vote Percent Precinct 004 PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES JOHN F. KERRY and JOHN EDWARDS Democratic 223 33.2 % GEORGE W. BUSH and DICK CHENEY Republican 440 65.5 % DAVID COBB and PATRICIA LaMARCHE Green 2 0.3 % MICHAEL PEROUTKA and DR. CHUCK BALDWIN Constitution 4 0.6 % MICHAEL BADNARIK and RICHARD V. CAMPAGNA Libertarian 1 0.1 % RALPH NADER and PETER MIGUEL CAMEJO Independent 2 0.3 % UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE - DISTRICT 2 GARY K. KING Democratic 193 29.4 % STEVE PEARCE Republican 463 70.6 % JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT EDWARD L. CHAVEZ Democratic 261 40.9 % NED S. FULLER Republican 377 59.1 % JUDGE OF THE COURT OF APPEALS MICHAEL E. VIGIL Democratic 240 38.0 % PAUL D. BARBER Republican 392 62.0 % STATE SENATOR - DISTRICT 14 JAMES G. TAYLOR Democratic 236 36.8 % FERNANDO E. C. DE BACA Republican 346 53.9 % ALFRED BENNETT, III Independent 13 2.0 % KATHLEEN ANN SABO Independent 47 7.3 % STATE REPRESENTATIVE - DISTRICT 10 HENRY (KIKI) SAAVEDRA Democratic 377 100.0 % DISTRICT JUDGE - 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICT, DIVISION 2 GEORGE P. EICHWALD Democratic 248 38.9 % STANLEY A. READ Republican 389 61.1 % DISTRICT JUDGE - 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICT, DIVISION 6 VIOLET C. OTERO Democratic 385 100.0 % DISTRICT ATTORNEY - 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICT LEMUEL L. MARTINEZ Democratic 232 36.4 % PETER A. ROSS Republican 406 63.6 % COUNTY COMMISSIONER - DISTRICT 5 YVONNE MARIE SANCHEZ Democratic 248 39.6 % LYNETTE FRANCINE STUBLEFIELD Republican 379 60.4 % MARY C.
Recommended publications
  • June 2004 GPCA Plenary June 5-6, 2004 Sacramento City College, Sacramento, CA

    June 2004 GPCA Plenary June 5-6, 2004 Sacramento City College, Sacramento, CA

    June 2004 GPCA Plenary June 5-6, 2004 Sacramento City College, Sacramento, CA Saturday Morning - 6/5/04 Delegate Orientation Ellen Maisen: Review of consensus-seeking process Reminder of why we seek consensus vs. simply voting: Voting creates factions, while consensus builds community spirit. Facilitators: Magali Offerman, Jim Shannon Notes: Adrienne Prince and Don Eichelberger (alt.) Vibes: Leslie Dinkin, Don Eichelberger Time Keeper: Ed Duliba Confirming of Agenda Ratification of minutes, discussion of electoral reform, and platform plank have all been moved to Sunday. Time-sensitive agenda items were given priority. Consent Calendar Jo Chamberlain, SMC: Media bylaws concerns will also be discussed Sunday a.m. Clarification on “point of process” for Consent Calendar: when concerns are brought up, the item in question becomes dropped from the calendar and can be brought up for discussion and voting later in the plenary as time allows. I. GPUS Post-First-Round Ballot Voting Instructions Proposal - Nanette Pratini, Jonathan Lundell, Jim Stauffer Regarding convention delegate voting procedure: “If a delegate’s assigned candidate withdraws from the race or if subsequent votes are required…delegates will vote using their best judgment…as to what the voters who selected their assigned candidate would choose.” Floor rules in process of being approved by national CC. Will be conducted as a series of rounds, announced state by state. For first round, delegates are tied to the candidates as represented in the primary. If someone wins and does not want to accept the vote, subsequent rounds will vote. If a willing candidate gets a majority, they will be nominated, If “no candidate” (an option) wins, there will be an IRV election for an endorsement instead of a nomination.
  • Suffolk University Virginia General Election Voters SUPRC Field

    Suffolk University Virginia General Election Voters SUPRC Field

    Suffolk University Virginia General Election Voters AREA N= 600 100% DC Area ........................................ 1 ( 1/ 98) 164 27% West ........................................... 2 51 9% Piedmont Valley ................................ 3 134 22% Richmond South ................................. 4 104 17% East ........................................... 5 147 25% START Hello, my name is __________ and I am conducting a survey for Suffolk University and I would like to get your opinions on some political questions. We are calling Virginia households statewide. Would you be willing to spend three minutes answering some brief questions? <ROTATE> or someone in that household). N= 600 100% Continue ....................................... 1 ( 1/105) 600 100% GEND RECORD GENDER N= 600 100% Male ........................................... 1 ( 1/106) 275 46% Female ......................................... 2 325 54% S2 S2. Thank You. How likely are you to vote in the Presidential Election on November 4th? N= 600 100% Very likely .................................... 1 ( 1/107) 583 97% Somewhat likely ................................ 2 17 3% Not very/Not at all likely ..................... 3 0 0% Other/Undecided/Refused ........................ 4 0 0% Q1 Q1. Which political party do you feel closest to - Democrat, Republican, or Independent? N= 600 100% Democrat ....................................... 1 ( 1/110) 269 45% Republican ..................................... 2 188 31% Independent/Unaffiliated/Other ................. 3 141 24% Not registered
  • Activist Literacy and Dr. Jill Stein's 2012 Green Party Campaign

    Activist Literacy and Dr. Jill Stein's 2012 Green Party Campaign

    45 Recognizing the Rhetorics of Feminist Action: Activist Literacy and Dr. Jill Stein’s 2012 Green Party Campaign Virginia Crisco Abstract: Scholars such as Nancy Welch and Susan Jarratt argue that Neoliberalism shapes how everyday citizens are able to take action. Using what Jacquelyn Jones Royster and Gesa Kirsch call “social circulation,” I analyze how Dr. Jill Stein, the presidential candidate for the Green Party in 2012, used “whatever spaces are left” to challenge the dominant two party system, particularly in relation to the pres- idential debates. I argue that Stein demonstrates an activist literacy disposition that positions her to use the spaces, the literate and rhetorical means, and oppor- tunities for storytelling to foster social action in our neoliberal climate. Keywords: neoliberalism, social circulation, activist literacy, third party politics In Living Room: Teaching Public Writing in a Privatized World, Nancy Welch argues that neoliberalism has changed not only the topics available for public discussion in the pursuit of making socio-political change, but the venues for having those discussions, as they have also become increasingly privatized. As an example, Welch refects on her experiences advocating for her husband’s health care to their insurance company. She describes the multiple letters she had gotten from her insurance company saying their appeal for his care had been denied, using the same phrases again and again, as if her carefully re- searched and rhetorical letters were not even being read. This leads Welch to question the amount of power we as teachers and scholars of writing give to language and rhetoric: These are rhetorical strategies that, mostly in the abstract, have given me comfort – comfort in the belief that I really can wield power in language, that I can empower my students, particularly those subor- dinate by gender, race, sexuality, and class, to do the same.
  • The Hilltop 11-2-2004 Magazine

    The Hilltop 11-2-2004 Magazine

    Howard University Digital Howard @ Howard University The iH lltop: 2000 - 2010 The iH lltop Digital Archive 11-2-2004 The iH lltop 11-2-2004 Magazine Hilltop Staff Follow this and additional works at: https://dh.howard.edu/hilltop_0010 Recommended Citation Staff, Hilltop, "The iH lltop 11-2-2004 Magazine" (2004). The Hilltop: 2000 - 2010. 199. https://dh.howard.edu/hilltop_0010/199 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the The iH lltop Digital Archive at Digital Howard @ Howard University. It has been accepted for inclusion in The iH lltop: 2000 - 2010 by an authorized administrator of Digital Howard @ Howard University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Hilltop THE BATTLE: IN AN EPIC BA TILE FOR --:J:n~.r l!liiM1 STANDING BY YOUR MAN: ALWAYS AGREE WITH THEIR RUNNING MATES, BUT THEY MUST STAND BEHIND IHEIR~- . PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE AND SUPPORT THEM IF THEY WILL BECOME VICE PRESIDENT. Bush and Kerry battle II out for the iob • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • t Kerry and Bush t i J:ompared. •' 'I l •I •I • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • FILEPHOTO -1<now who else ~ Is on the ballet. •• ••••••••• The second in Charge: THE VICE PRESIDENT FILE PHOTO • • • • • • • • The money Find out how • • Spent on the The Electoral • • Campaign College Vote • • Works • FILE PHOTO • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 't ... • • • • Do you know • • Who your • • Senior is? • • FILE PHOTO FILE PHOTO • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Three US Supreme Justices to retire soon MAGAZINE DESIGNED BY ARION JAMERSON I ~ • • • • • •I ,• • • I • I • • • I I • • • • • t .... .. .... FILE PHOTOS The Battle to Become President of the United States ofAme rica • BY NAKIA HILL to the Republican and Democratic Bush had four years to do some­ Conventions and both candidates thing anything to make life bet­ Millions of United States positions.
  • Updates from PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE VIRGIL GOODE…

    Updates from PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE VIRGIL GOODE…

    Monday, September 24, 2012 Volume 1, Issue 10 Updates from presidential Articles… candidate virgil goode… Goode Updates - page 1 Goode in the Media - page 1 Last week I traveled to Newark, Ohio for the From the Chairman - page 2 Constitution Party State Convention chaired by Candidate’s Corner - page 2 Don Shrader. National Vice Chairman, Randy Natl. Conference Calls - page 2 Stufflebeam, attended and introduced me. Don, Randy, and I focused on the differences between the Constitution Party on the one Congressman Goode with "Romney" and "Obama" as hand and the Democratic and Republican parties they prepare for the John Stossel interview. Mr. Stossel allowed "Romney" and "Obama" to be on on the other. Those in attendance were urged to the questioning panel, but said they had so much air work hard between now and Election Day. time they did not need a speaking roll. On the Thursday prior to the Ohio Constitution Party Convention, I and Vice Presidential candidate Jim Clymer attended the Institute on the Constitution in Pasadena, Maryland, hosted by 2004 Constitution Party Presidential Candidate Michael Peroutka. 2008 Constitu- tion Party Presidential Candidate, Chuck Baldwin, also attended the Institute and spoke ear- lier in the day. On Tuesday, I was in New York for the taping of the John Stossel show, which was aired on September 13. After the Stossel interview and forum, I appeared live on the Lawrence The CP prevailed at our O'Donnell show. I attended a number of events last week, including government classes hearing before the New meeting at E.C. Glass High School in Lynchburg, Virginia which were covered by both the Hampshire Ballot Law National Associated Press and the Washington Post.
  • Taker GREEN PARTY of CALIFORNIA June 2017 General

    Taker GREEN PARTY of CALIFORNIA June 2017 General

    Mimi Newton, Sacramento GA Note- Taker GREEN PARTY OF CALIFORNIA June 2017 General Assembly Minutes Sacramento, June 17-18, 2017 ATTENDEES: Name County Sacramento Delegate status Present/Absent Brett Dixon Alameda Delegate P Greg Jan Alameda Delegate P James McFadden Alameda Not delegate P Jan Arnold Alameda Delegate P Laura Wells Alameda Delegate P Maxine Daniel Alameda Delegate P Michael Rubin Alameda Delegate P Pam Spevack Alameda Delegate P Paul Rea Alameda Delegate P Phoebe Sorgen Alameda Delegate P Erik Rydberg Butte Delegate P Bert Heuer Contra Costa Not delegate P Brian Deckman Contra Costa Not delegate P Meleiza Figueroa Contra Costa Not delegate P Tim Laidman Contra Costa Delegate P Megan Buckingham Fresno Delegate P David Cobb Humboldt Delegate/Alt P Jim Smith Humboldt Delegate P Kelsey Reedy Humboldt Not delegate P Kyle Dust Humboldt Delegate P Matt Smith-Caggiano Humboldt Delegate/Alt P Cassidy Sheppard Kern Delegate P Penny Sheppard Kern Delegate P Ajay Rai Los Angeles Delegate P Andrea Houtman Los Angeles Not delegate P Angel Orellana Los Angeles Delegate P Angelina Saucedo Los Angeles Delegate P Cesar Gonzalez Los Angeles Not delegate P Christopher Cruz Los Angeles Delegate P Daniel Mata Los Angeles Delegate P Doug Barnett Los Angeles Delegate P Fernando Ramirez Los Angeles Delegate P James Lauderdale Los Angeles Not delegate P Jimmy Rivera Los Angeles Delegate P Kenneth Mejia Los Angeles Delegate P Lisa Salvary Los Angeles Delegate P Liz Solis Los Angeles Delegate P Marla Bernstein Los Angeles Delegate P Martin Conway
  • 2010 Green Party Platform

    2010 Green Party Platform

    Platform 2010 Green Party of the United States As Adopted by the Green National Committee September 2010 About the Green Party The Green Party of the United States is a federation of state Green Parties. Committed to environmentalism, non-violence, social justice and grassroots organizing, Greens are renewing democracy without the support of corporate donors. Greens provide real solutions for real problems. Whether the issue is universal health care, corporate globalization, alternative energy, election reform or decent, living wages for workers, Greens have the courage and independence necessary to take on the powerful corporate interests. The Federal Elec - tions Commission recognizes the Green Party of the United States as the official Green Party National Com - mittee. We are partners with the European Federation of Green Parties and the Federation of Green Parties of the Americas. The Green Party of the United States was formed in 2001 from of the older Association of State Green Parties (1996-2001). Our initial goal was to help existing state parties grow and to promote the formation of parties in all 51 states and colonies. Helping state parties is still our primary goal. As the Green Party National Com - mittee we will devote our attention to establishing a national Green presence in politics and policy debate while continuing to facilitate party growth and action at the state and local level. Green Party growth has been rapid since our founding and Green candidates are winning elections through - out the United States. State party membership has more than doubled. At the 2000 Presidential Nominating Convention we nominated Ralph Nader and Winona LaDuke for our Presidential ticket.
  • The Case for Fraud in Ohio Election 2004

    The Case for Fraud in Ohio Election 2004

    The Case for Fraud in Ohio Election 2004 I. Voter Suppression A. Overly Restrictive Registration Requirements B. Incompetence in Processing Registrations C. Challenges to New Registrants on Insufficient Grounds D. Misinformation About Voting Status/Location/Date E. Voter Intimidation F. Voting Machine Shortages/Malfunctions G. Overly Restrictive Rules & Incorrect Procedure Regarding Provisional Ballots H. Poorly Designed Absentee Ballots Caused Voters to Mark Incorrect Candidate II. Access to Voting Systems Before Election Violates Protocol III. A Third-Rate Burglary in Toledo IV. Suspect Results A. Registration Irregularities B. Exceptionally High Voter Turnout C. More Votes than Voters D. Exceptionally High Rates of Undervotes E. High Rate of Overvotes Due to Ballots Pre-Punched for Bush? F. The Kerry/Connally Discrepancy G. Discrepancy between Exit Polls & Tabulated Votes V. Restricting Citizen Observation & Access to Public Documents A. Warren County Lockdown B. Restricting Citizen Access to Election Records VI. What Went Wrong with the Recounts/Investigation of Vote Irregularities A. Chain of Custody of Voting Machines & Materials Violated B. Failure to Follow Established Procedures for Recounts C. Failure to Allow Recount Observers to Fully Examine Materials D. Secretary of State Blackwell has Failed to Answer Questions VII. Recount Reveals Significant Problems VIII. Methods of Election Fraud A. Stuffing the Ballot Box B. Touchscreen voting machines appear to have been set to “Bush” as Default C. Computers pre-programmed to ‘adjust’ vote count in Bush’s favor? D. Tampering with the Tabulators: Evidence of Hacking in Real-Time? IX. Additional Observations A. Irregular/Impossible Changes in Exit Polls over time on Election Night I.
  • Auditing Technology for Electronic Voting Machines

    Auditing Technology for Electronic Voting Machines

    CALTECH/MIT VOTING TECHNOLOGY PROJECT A multi-disciplinary, collaborative project of the California Institute of Technology – Pasadena, California 91125 and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology – Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 AUDITING TECHNOLOGY FOR ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINES Sharon B. Cohen MIT Key words: DRE, voting machine security, electronic voting, electronic voting machines, auditing technology VTP WORKING PAPER #46 May 2005 Auditing Technology for Electronic Voting Machines by Sharon B. Cohen Submitted to the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degrees of Bachelor of Science in Computer Science and Engineering and Master of Engineering in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology May 19, 2005 Copyright 2005 Sharon B. Cohen. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to M.I.T. permission to reproduce and distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis and to grant others the right to do so. Author_________________________________________________________________ Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science May 19, 2005 Certified by___________________________________________________________ Ted Selker Thesis Supervisor Accepted by____________________________________________________________ Arthur C. Smith Chairman, Department Committee on Graduate Theses Auditing Technology for Electronic Voting Machines by Sharon B. Cohen Submitted to the Department of Electrical Engineering
  • CONSOLIDATED PRIMARY ELECTION MARCH 2, 2004 Results As of 03/24/2004 Certified Election Results

    CONSOLIDATED PRIMARY ELECTION MARCH 2, 2004 Results As of 03/24/2004 Certified Election Results

    CONSOLIDATED PRIMARY ELECTION MARCH 2, 2004 Results as of 03/24/2004 Certified Election Results PRECINCTS COUNTED - TOTAL Completed Precincts: 132 of 132 Reg/Turnout Percentage REGISTERED VOTERS - TOTAL 45,734 BALLOTS CAST - TOTAL 18,027 39.42% BALLOTS CAST - DEMOCRATIC 7,330 16.03% BALLOTS CAST - REPUBLICAN 9,031 19.75% BALLOTS CAST - AMERICAN INDEPENDENT 228 0.50% BALLOTS CAST - GREEN 29 0.06% BALLOTS CAST - LIBERTARIAN 43 0.09% BALLOTS CAST - NATURAL LAW 6 0.01% BALLOTS CAST - PEACE AND FREEDOM 2 0.00% BALLOTS CAST - DEM DECLINE TO STATE 119 0.26% BALLOTS CAST - REP DECLINE TO STATE 95 0.21% BALLOTS CAST - AI DECLINE TO STATE 17 0.04% BALLOTS CAST - NONPARTISAN 1,127 2.46% PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENCE DEMOCRAT AND DECLINE TO STATE Vote For: 1 Completed Precincts: 132 of 132 Candidate Name Vote Count Percentage JOHN F. KERRY 4,280 63.54% JOHN EDWARDS 1,616 23.99% HOWARD DEAN 276 4.10% JOE LIEBERMAN 122 1.81% CAROL MOSELEY BRAUN 120 1.78% AL SHARPTON 102 1.51% WESLEY CLARK 86 1.28% DICK GEPHARDT 62 0.92% DENNIS J. KUCINICH 55 0.82% LYNDON LAROUCHE 17 0.25% PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENCE DEMOCRATIC VOTERS ONLY Vote For: 1 Completed Precincts: 132 of 132 Candidate Name Vote Count Percentage JOHN F. KERRY 4,219 63.68% JOHN EDWARDS 1,578 23.82% HOWARD DEAN 271 4.09% JOE LIEBERMAN 122 1.84% CAROL MOSELEY BRAUN 118 1.78% AL SHARPTON 101 1.52% WESLEY CLARK 86 1.30% DICK GEPHARDT 62 0.94% DENNIS J. KUCINICH 51 0.77% LYNDON LAROUCHE 17 0.26% PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENCE DECLINE TO STATE VOTERS ONLY Vote For: 1 Completed Precincts: 132 of 132 Candidate Name Vote Count Percentage JOHN F.
  • The State Board of Education

    The State Board of Education

    THE STAte OF the RELIGIOUS RIGht { 2008 } THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION: DRAGGING TEXAS SCHOOLS INTO THE CULTURE WARS THE STAte OF the RELIGIOUS RIGht { 2008 } THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION: DRAGGING TEXAS SCHOOLS INTO THE CULTURE WARS A R E p ort f ro m the T exas f R E E D O m N etwor k E ducation f U N D kathy miller, TFN president Dan Quinn, TFN communications director Bren Gorman, researcher Judie Niskala, researcher Emily Sentilles, researcher A bout the T f N E ducation f U N D The Texas Freedom Network Education Fund is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt, nonprofit corporation. Created in 1996, the TFN Education Fund researches the agenda, activities and funding of the religious right. It also educates mainstream people of faith in how to formulate and to advocate a faith-based response to the religious right’s policy agenda. TfN Education fund Board of Directors Rebecca Lightsey, chair Janis pinnelli, treasurer Rev. Dr. Larry Bethune Grace Garcia Diane Ireson Dale Linebarger Table Of Contents Introduction. .2. Watch List: 2008. .5 1: The State Board of Education in Texas. .11 2: A History of Censorship in Texas. .17 3: The Right Ascendant. 21 4: Targeting Curriculum Standards (TEKS). .25 Appendices Appendix A: Who’s Who in Texas Textbook Censorship . .30 Appendix B: Textbook Censorship in Texas: A Timeline. .32 Appendix C: Textbook Censorship in Texas: The Record. .35 Appendix D: They Really Said It: Quoting the Religious Right in 2007 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ...36 Appendix E: Organizations of the Religious Right in Texas.
  • Federal Elections 2004

    Federal Elections 2004

    2004 ELECTION RESULTS The following four sections present the primary, runoff and general election results for the U.S. Presidential and U.S. Congressional elections held in 2004. The November 2004 general election (and Louisiana’s December 2004 runoff election) resulted in the election of the 109th Congress. The following is the party composition of the 109th Congress, as determined by the results of these elections: U.S. Senate Republicans: 55 Democrats: 44 Independents: 1 U.S. House of Representatives Republicans: 232 Democrats: 202 Independents: 1 Notes on Charts * Runoff election vote totals have been included with the primary election totals. (For the U.S. Senate, runoff elections were held in Georgia and South Carolina. For the U.S. House of Representatives, runoff elections were held in Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina and Texas.) For Louisiana, runoff election vote totals have been included with the general election totals. The following three situations account for blank spaces in the charts and should be considered when making comparisons or drawing conclusions about the vote totals. * In some states, i.e., Connecticut, Utah and Virginia, political parties may nominate general election candidates by party convention, rather than by primary election. * In some states, there were unopposed candidates whose names did not appear on a ballot and therefore received no votes. * 34 states had regularly scheduled U.S. Senate elections in 2004. 2004 PRESIDENTIAL POPULAR VOTE SUMMARY FOR ALL CANDIDATES LISTED ON AT LEAST ONE STATE BALLOT Candidate (Party Label) Popular Vote Total Percent of Popular Vote George W. Bush (Republican) 62,040,610 50.73% John F.