DOCSLIB.ORG

Updates from PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE VIRGIL GOODE…

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Updates from PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE VIRGIL GOODE… Monday, September 24, 2012 Volume 1, Issue 10 Updates from presidential Articles… candidate virgil goode… Goode Updates - page 1 Goode in the Media - page 1 Last week I traveled to Newark, Ohio for the From the Chairman - page 2 Constitution Party State Convention chaired by Candidate’s Corner - page 2 Don Shrader. National Vice Chairman, Randy Natl. Conference Calls - page 2 Stufflebeam, attended and introduced me. Don, Randy, and I focused on the differences between the Constitution Party on the one Congressman Goode with "Romney" and "Obama" as hand and the Democratic and Republican parties they prepare for the John Stossel interview. Mr. Stossel allowed "Romney" and "Obama" to be on on the other. Those in attendance were urged to the questioning panel, but said they had so much air work hard between now and Election Day. time they did not need a speaking roll. On the Thursday prior to the Ohio Constitution Party Convention, I and Vice Presidential candidate Jim Clymer attended the Institute on the Constitution in Pasadena, Maryland, hosted by 2004 Constitution Party Presidential Candidate Michael Peroutka. 2008 Constitu- tion Party Presidential Candidate, Chuck Baldwin, also attended the Institute and spoke ear- lier in the day. On Tuesday, I was in New York for the taping of the John Stossel show, which was aired on September 13. After the Stossel interview and forum, I appeared live on the Lawrence The CP prevailed at our O'Donnell show. I attended a number of events last week, including government classes hearing before the New meeting at E.C. Glass High School in Lynchburg, Virginia which were covered by both the Hampshire Ballot Law National Associated Press and the Washington Post. On Saturday, I addressed the Second Commission on Friday, Tuesday Constitution Group in Roanoke, Virginia where the overwhelming feeling was to Sept. 20th so we are now return America to Constitutional basics. on the NH ballot! The money bomb on September 17th went well and more donations are needed so that we can do some commercials. The hearing in New Hampshire on the sufficiency of signatures Podcasts in one congressional district will be on September 20 and will determine whether we make with Castle the ballot in New Hampshire. We were pleased that we secured ballot access in both Rhode ... Island and Alabama last week. Three times each week, Darrell Castle covers a variety of topics based on international and national news. Click the links below to listen to recent broadcasts... Romney Finally Says What He Really Thinks Culture Clash in the Middle East QE-3 Arrives Across the Middle East Click the play button above to be taken to Virgil Click the play button above to be taken to Virgil Big Brother Has Arrived Goode’s interview on John Stossel’s Show Goode’s interview on MSNBC’s The Last Word “Party Crashers, Third Party Candidates”. with Lawrence O’ Donnell. Podcasts can be found by visiting: www.constitutionpartyoftennessee.com/blog www.ConstitutionParty.com Copyright © 2012 Constitution Party National Committee, All rights reserved. Paid for by Constitution Party National Committee, Jim Headings, Treasurer, P.O. Box 1782 Lancaster, PA 17608 Newsletter by AQDesigns From the Chairman… Every four years the established media bombard the airways with their propaganda of just how close the presidential race is and how critical it is that the voters choose between the lesser of two politicians. They are at the same game again this year. What they carefully avoid saying is that it is not the popular vote that elects the president, but rather the electoral vote. According to a recent Rasmussen Poll, a full 55% of registered votes are not pleased with one or both of the two major party candidates. I would guess that may be an all time high record. It is therefore very critical that this year’s voters make clear to the established parties that they don’t fall for their game. Until the elite of the established parties get that message they will continue to nominate mediocre candidates. The most effective way to make our voice heard is to not vote for either of them, but for the candidate that really stands for something. Let me explain. According to a very recent Rasmussen Poll, the red states with a total of only 196 electoral votes are considered safe or leaning toward Romney. These states tend to have a higher voter turn out than the more populated states and hence the popular vote tends to be closer. The blue states generally with large populations and a total of 243 electoral votes are considered safe or leaning toward Obama. The purple states are considered toss up states and they have a total of 99 electoral votes. All but one of those states voted for Obama in 2008, and if Obama carried just the state of Florida it would put him over the 270 electoral votes he needs to win the election. Romney could carry all of the remaining seven states and still lose the election. The odds of that happening are very slim indeed. He is not expected to carry his home state of Michigan nor Massachusetts where he was governor. Furthermore, it is reported that he is pulling his ads from both MI and PA since they are expected to go for Obama. In view of this it just makes good common sense for those voters in either safe Romney or safe Obama states who consider Romney or Obama to be the lesser of the two evils to simply vote for Virgil Goode. A vote for either the winner or the loser in those states is simply not a well thought-out vote. Intelligent and wise voting in this regard would send an earth shaking message to the established parties that the voters have caught on to their game of manipulating voters. But more importantly, the voters can sleep at night knowing their conscience is free of guilt and that they have cast a vote for liberty that will be heard loud and clear. In the coming weeks, I ask that each of you give this approach your serious consideration and then share those thoughts with people that are very important to you. Your National Chairman, Frank Fluckiger National conference calls to begin… Candidate’s Corner… National Chairman, Frank Fluckiger will be holding three national Timothy Utz is running for the Minnesota conference calls; two will be combined regional calls and one House District 41-B seat. The disregard for will focus on state leadership. constitutionalism, limited government, freedom and personal responsibility by our Dates for the calls: current elected officials sparked his desire to -- Eastern and Southern Regions – Tuesday, Sept. 25 make a difference. -- Midwest & Western – Wednesday, Sept. 26 Mr. Utz knows the importance of state policy and the -- National State Leaders Conference Call – Thursday, Oct. 4 effect it has on each and every one of us. As state representative, he will work hard to ensure that legislation Calls start at 9:00pm Eastern time and will last complies with the constitution, upholds personal one hour. property rights, maximizes personal liberty and restrains government. Most of all, he will ensure that the voice of Call-in Information: “We the People” is heard in St. Paul. Phone Number: 1-712-432-3066 Code: 878-870 Visit www.timutzforhouse.com for more information. Join us on our social networking sites... .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Suffolk University Virginia General Election Voters SUPRC Field
    Suffolk University Virginia General Election Voters AREA N= 600 100% DC Area ........................................ 1 ( 1/ 98) 164 27% West ........................................... 2 51 9% Piedmont Valley ................................ 3 134 22% Richmond South ................................. 4 104 17% East ........................................... 5 147 25% START Hello, my name is __________ and I am conducting a survey for Suffolk University and I would like to get your opinions on some political questions. We are calling Virginia households statewide. Would you be willing to spend three minutes answering some brief questions? <ROTATE> or someone in that household). N= 600 100% Continue ....................................... 1 ( 1/105) 600 100% GEND RECORD GENDER N= 600 100% Male ........................................... 1 ( 1/106) 275 46% Female ......................................... 2 325 54% S2 S2. Thank You. How likely are you to vote in the Presidential Election on November 4th? N= 600 100% Very likely .................................... 1 ( 1/107) 583 97% Somewhat likely ................................ 2 17 3% Not very/Not at all likely ..................... 3 0 0% Other/Undecided/Refused ........................ 4 0 0% Q1 Q1. Which political party do you feel closest to - Democrat, Republican, or Independent? N= 600 100% Democrat ....................................... 1 ( 1/110) 269 45% Republican ..................................... 2 188 31% Independent/Unaffiliated/Other ................. 3 141 24% Not registered
    [Show full text]
  • The Hilltop 11-2-2004 Magazine
    Howard University Digital Howard @ Howard University The iH lltop: 2000 - 2010 The iH lltop Digital Archive 11-2-2004 The iH lltop 11-2-2004 Magazine Hilltop Staff Follow this and additional works at: https://dh.howard.edu/hilltop_0010 Recommended Citation Staff, Hilltop, "The iH lltop 11-2-2004 Magazine" (2004). The Hilltop: 2000 - 2010. 199. https://dh.howard.edu/hilltop_0010/199 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the The iH lltop Digital Archive at Digital Howard @ Howard University. It has been accepted for inclusion in The iH lltop: 2000 - 2010 by an authorized administrator of Digital Howard @ Howard University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Hilltop THE BATTLE: IN AN EPIC BA TILE FOR --:J:n~.r l!liiM1 STANDING BY YOUR MAN: ALWAYS AGREE WITH THEIR RUNNING MATES, BUT THEY MUST STAND BEHIND IHEIR~- . PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE AND SUPPORT THEM IF THEY WILL BECOME VICE PRESIDENT. Bush and Kerry battle II out for the iob • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • t Kerry and Bush t i J:ompared. •' 'I l •I •I • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • FILEPHOTO -1<now who else ~ Is on the ballet. •• ••••••••• The second in Charge: THE VICE PRESIDENT FILE PHOTO • • • • • • • • The money Find out how • • Spent on the The Electoral • • Campaign College Vote • • Works • FILE PHOTO • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 't ... • • • • Do you know • • Who your • • Senior is? • • FILE PHOTO FILE PHOTO • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Three US Supreme Justices to retire soon MAGAZINE DESIGNED BY ARION JAMERSON I ~ • • • • • •I ,• • • I • I • • • I I • • • • • t .... .. .... FILE PHOTOS The Battle to Become President of the United States ofAme rica • BY NAKIA HILL to the Republican and Democratic Bush had four years to do some­ Conventions and both candidates thing anything to make life bet­ Millions of United States positions.
    [Show full text]
  • The State Board of Education
    THE STAte OF the RELIGIOUS RIGht { 2008 } THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION: DRAGGING TEXAS SCHOOLS INTO THE CULTURE WARS THE STAte OF the RELIGIOUS RIGht { 2008 } THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION: DRAGGING TEXAS SCHOOLS INTO THE CULTURE WARS A R E p ort f ro m the T exas f R E E D O m N etwor k E ducation f U N D kathy miller, TFN president Dan Quinn, TFN communications director Bren Gorman, researcher Judie Niskala, researcher Emily Sentilles, researcher A bout the T f N E ducation f U N D The Texas Freedom Network Education Fund is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt, nonprofit corporation. Created in 1996, the TFN Education Fund researches the agenda, activities and funding of the religious right. It also educates mainstream people of faith in how to formulate and to advocate a faith-based response to the religious right’s policy agenda. TfN Education fund Board of Directors Rebecca Lightsey, chair Janis pinnelli, treasurer Rev. Dr. Larry Bethune Grace Garcia Diane Ireson Dale Linebarger Table Of Contents Introduction. .2. Watch List: 2008. .5 1: The State Board of Education in Texas. .11 2: A History of Censorship in Texas. .17 3: The Right Ascendant. 21 4: Targeting Curriculum Standards (TEKS). .25 Appendices Appendix A: Who’s Who in Texas Textbook Censorship . .30 Appendix B: Textbook Censorship in Texas: A Timeline. .32 Appendix C: Textbook Censorship in Texas: The Record. .35 Appendix D: They Really Said It: Quoting the Religious Right in 2007 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ...36 Appendix E: Organizations of the Religious Right in Texas.
    [Show full text]
  • Faith for All of Life March/April 2006 Editorials 2 from the Editor
    Faith for All of Life March/April 2006 Publisher & Chalcedon President Rev. Mark R. Rushdoony Editorials Features Chalcedon Vice-President Martin Selbrede 2 From the Editor 12 The Leadership Editor Faith and Responsibility Principle Rev. Christopher J. Ortiz Christopher J. Ortiz 4 From the Founder Managing Editor The Theology of Fascism 16 The Death of Susan Burns Secular Humanism 6 From the President Contributing Editor Gary North The Danger of Syncretism Walter & Megan Lindsay Can the State Care Lee Duigon 20 Columns for Children? Chalcedon Founder Timothy D. Terrell Rev. R. J. Rushdoony 10 The Fairfax County (1916-2001) Resolves Reviews was the founder of Chalcedon Roger Schultz and a leading theologian, church/ 28 Attention Defecit Democracy state expert, and author of numer- 23 Caring for Our Own by James Bovard ous works on the application of Darlene Rushdoony Reviewed by Timothy D. Terrel Biblical Law to society. 24 Special Column: 30 The Call to Conversion: Why Receiving Faith for All of Life: This John Lofton on the Faith is Always Personal But magazine will be sent to those who Immorality of the request it. At least once a year we ask Never Private by Jim Wallis that you return a response card if you Federal Budget Reviewed by Lee Duigon wish to remain on the mailing list. Lee Duigon Contributors are kept on our mailing list. Suggested Donation: $35 per Products year ($45 for all foreign — U.S. funds only). Tax-deductible contributions 34 Catalog may be made out to Chalcedon and mailed to P.O. Box 158, Vallecito, CA 48 Order Form 95251 USA.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 OFFICIAL PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS General Election Date: 11/04/08 DATE: January 22, 2009 SOURCE: State Elections Offices
    2008 OFFICIAL PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS General Election Date: 11/04/08 DATE: January 22, 2009 SOURCE: State Elections Offices STATE ALLEN AMONDSON BALDWIN BARR BOSS CALERO DUNCAN HARRIS JAY AL 4,310 4,991 AK 1,660 1,589 AZ 8 1,371 12,555 16 AR 4,023 4,776 CA 3,145 67,582 49 CO 348 85 6,233 10,897 154 598 CT 311 10 DE 626 1,109 58 DC FL 293 7,915 17,218 533 795 GA 8 1,314 28,812 20 HI 1,013 1,314 ID 4,747 3,658 IL 8,256 19,645 IN 1,024 29,257 IA 4,445 4,590 292 KS 2 4,148 6,706 KY 1 4,694 5,989 LA 275 2,581 735 ME 3 177 251 MD 3,760 9,842 1 MA 4,971 13,189 MI 14,685 23,716 MN 6,787 9,174 790 MS 2,551 2,529 MO 8,201 11,386 MT 1 143 1,355 NE 2,972 2,740 NV 3,194 4,263 NH 226 2,217 NJ 3,956 8,441 639 523 NM 1,597 2,428 NY 1 614 19,513 3,596 NC 25,722 ND 1,199 1,354 OH 2 12,550 19,888 3,902 OK OR 7,693 7,635 PA 1,092 19,912 RI 675 1,382 SC 6,827 7,283 SD 1,895 1,835 TN 8,191 8,547 1,011 TX 101 5,395 56,116 UT 2 12,012 6,966 1 VT 500 1,067 150 VA 7,474 11,067 WA 9,432 12,728 641 WV 2,465 WI 5,072 8,858 WY 1,192 1,594 Total: 477 653 199,314 523,686 639 5,127 3,902 2,424 2,422 Percentage: 0.00% 0.00% 0.15% 0.40% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% *Note: Italics indicate Write-In Votes.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 United States District Court for the District Of
    Case 1:15-cv-01580-RMC Document 56 Filed 08/24/16 Page 1 of 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________ GARY E. JOHNSON, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 15-1580 (RMC) ) COMMISSION ON PRESIDENTIAL ) DEBATES, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________ ) AMENDED OPINION1 The Libertarian and Green Parties and their political candidates sought, and failed to receive, invitations to privately-sponsored presidential debates in 2012. They now seek invitations to this year’s presidential debates, claiming that the rules that bar their participation violate antitrust law. However, because Plaintiffs have no standing and because antitrust laws govern commercial markets and not political activity, those claims fail as a matter of well- established law. Plaintiffs also allege violations of the First Amendment, but those claims must be dismissed because the First Amendment guarantees freedom from government infringement and Defendants here are private parties. Finally, Plaintiffs fail to allege facts that could support a claim for intentional interference with prospective business advantage. Defendants’ motions to dismiss will be granted. I. FACTS Plaintiffs are the Libertarian National Committee, which controls the U.S. Libertarian Party; Gary Johnson, the Libertarian Party’s nominee for president in 2012; Gary Johnson 2012, Inc., a corporation that served as the campaign committee for Mr. Johnson in 1 This Opinion was amended pursuant to the Court’s August 15, 2016 Order [Dkt 55]. 1 Case 1:15-cv-01580-RMC Document 56 Filed 08/24/16 Page 2 of 27 2012; James Gray, Mr. Johnson’s 2012 vice presidential running mate; the Green Party; Jill Stein, the Green Party’s nominee for president in 2012; Jill Stein for President, the entity that served as Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Civics and the Constitution
    1 First printing: June 2019 Note from Authors: Dear Friends, Copyright © 2019 by Institute on the Constitution. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in Welcome to this course developed by any manner whatsoever without written permission of the the Institute on the Constitution! As one publisher, except in the case of brief quotations in articles of the founders of the Institute, I want and reviews. For information write: to commend you for your interest in ® Master Books , P.O. Box 726, Green Forest, AR 72638 constitutional government and for your ® Master Books is a division of the New Leaf Publishing Group, Inc. love and respect of America. ISBN: 978-1-68344-168-7 As you work through this course, you ISBN: 978-1-61458-713-2 (digital) should know that you are taking part in the noble experiment in self-government Cover Design: Diana Bogardus Book Design: Terry White that our Founders envisioned. It is essential that all Americans have Unless otherwise noted, Scripture quotations are from the a foundational understanding of King James Version of the Bible. the proper role and limits of civil Please consider requesting that a copy of this volume be government in these United States of purchased by your local library system. America, and that this understanding be passed on to our children and to Printed in the United States of America their children. Liberty under law is our heritage and it is the blessing we Please visit our website for other great titles: earnestly seek to preserve for posterity.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Official General Election Results
    State of New Mexico Election Results Reporting Application NOTICE: This web site displays unofficial election results. Official results will not be available until after the election is audited. Valencia County Total Number of Voters: 26097 11/15/2004 9:16:28 AM Number of Precincts Reporting 37 of 37 Candidate or Issue Party Total Vote Percent Precinct 001 PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES JOHN F. KERRY and JOHN EDWARDS Democratic 507 39.2 % GEORGE W. BUSH and DICK CHENEY Republican 777 60.1 % DAVID COBB and PATRICIA LaMARCHE Green 0 0.0 % MICHAEL PEROUTKA and DR. CHUCK BALDWIN Constitution 1 0.1 % MICHAEL BADNARIK and RICHARD V. CAMPAGNA Libertarian 1 0.1 % RALPH NADER and PETER MIGUEL CAMEJO Independent 6 0.5 % UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE - DISTRICT 2 GARY K. KING Democratic 512 40.3 % STEVE PEARCE Republican 759 59.7 % JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT EDWARD L. CHAVEZ Democratic 630 51.1 % NED S. FULLER Republican 603 48.9 % JUDGE OF THE COURT OF APPEALS MICHAEL E. VIGIL Democratic 636 51.3 % PAUL D. BARBER Republican 603 48.7 % STATE SENATOR - DISTRICT 29 MICHAEL S. SANCHEZ Democratic 714 56.8 % ABRAN D. GABALDON Republican 544 43.2 % STATE REPRESENTATIVE - DISTRICT 8 FRED LUNA Democratic 569 45.1 % JACKIE FARNSWORTH Republican 694 54.9 % DISTRICT JUDGE - 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICT, DIVISION 2 GEORGE P. EICHWALD Democratic 616 50.2 % STANLEY A. READ Republican 612 49.8 % DISTRICT JUDGE - 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICT, DIVISION 6 VIOLET C. OTERO Democratic 893 100.0 % DISTRICT ATTORNEY - 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICT LEMUEL L. MARTINEZ Democratic 603 48.6 % PETER A.
    [Show full text]
  • Methodology Report and User's Guide for the 2008-2009 ANES Panel Study
    Methodology Report and User’s Guide for the 2008–2009 ANES Panel Study August 2010 (Revised September 22, 2010) (Revised December 13, 2010) Matthew DeBell Jon A. Krosnick Arthur Lupia American National Election Studies Stanford University and the University of Michigan This document may be freely copied or redistributed, provided it is not altered. Suggested Citation Matthew DeBell, Jon A. Krosnick, and Arthur Lupia. 2010. Methodology Report and User’s Guide for the 2008–2009 ANES Panel Study. Palo Alto, CA, and Ann Arbor, MI: Stanford University and the University of Michigan. Acknowledgments This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Nos. SES- 0535332 and SES-0535334. ANES is also supported by Stanford University and the University of Michigan. Sections of this report may reprint previous documentation of the American National Election Studies without explicit attribution. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation, Stanford University, or the University of Michigan. The ANES Principal Investigators for the Panel Study were Jon A. Krosnick at Stanford University and Arthur Lupia at the University of Michigan. Vincent Hutchings at the University of Michigan was Associate Principal Investigator. The Panel Study director was Matthew DeBell. ANES staff on the study were Caroline Roberts, Jaime Ventura, and Jonathan Cowden, with additional support from Darrell Donakowski, Catherine Wilson, Pat Luevano, Heather Branton, Laurie Pierson, and David Howell. Research assistance at Stanford was provided by Wendy Gross, Farah Giga, Gaurav Sood, Lucila Figueroa, Mackenzie Israel-Trummel, Yo-Yo Chen, Helen Chen, Troy Wu, Jade Wang, Logan Ensign, Peter Tu, Abiy Teshome, and Mario Suntanu, with some additional ad hoc support from Autumn Carter, Mai El-Sadany, Lucinda Gibbs, Natasha Kim, Andy Nguyen, Deborah Oh, Noelle Spring, and Elaine Albertson.
    [Show full text]
  • By Chuck Baldwin February 13, 2007
    50 Americans I Wish Were Most Influential 50 Americans I Wish Were Most Influential by Chuck Baldwin February 13, 2007 The Church Report recently announced this year's list ofits "50 Most Influential Christians in America." The list's top 10 are Joel Osteen, Billy Graham, Bill Hybels, T.D. Jakes, James Dobson, Paul Crouch, Joyce Meyer, Leonard Sweet, John Piper, and Rob Bell. Other notables making the top 50 include President Bush, Robert Schuller, Franklin Graham, Rick Warren, Chuck Colson, Andy Stanley, Joni Eareckson Tada, Jay Sekulow, Chuck Swindoll, Jack Hayford, Richard Land, Charles Stanley, Max Lucado, John Hagee, D. James Kennedy, George Bama, Rod Parsley, Jerry Falwell, Sam Brownback, John MacArthur, Frank Page, and Creflo Dollar. What strikes me most about the above list are the names ofpeople I wish were listed but were not. Unfortunately, the people who are most consistently championing the principles that would restore America to its former selfare mostly ignored by the mainstream media and even by the Christian media. The above list clearly illustrates this reality. Therefore, without giving a ranking to each name, I would like to offer my list of "50 Americans I Wish Were The Most Influential." I can tell readers this: Ifthese people were America's most influential leaders (Christian or otherwise), our country would not be in the shape it is in today. And that is a fact. Anyway, here goes. David Alan Black, Derry Brownfield, Tom DeWeese, John Eidsmoe, Ezola Foster, Rick Jore, Alan Keyes, Stanley Monteith, Roy S. Moore,
    [Show full text]
  • Directory of U.S. Political Parties the Two Major
    DIRECTORY OF U.S. POLITICAL PARTIES THE TWO MAJOR PARTIES: DEMOCRATIC PARTY (DNC) - The Democrats regained control of the US House and US Senate in the 2006 elections, and of the White House in the 2008 elections (plus widened their congressional advantage). An inability to cure the inherited stagnant national economy and voter discontent over health care and other successfully adopted Obama agenda items caused a significant erosion of support, costing the Democrats control of the House and several governorships in 2010. While prominent Democrats run the wide gamut from the near Euro-style democratic-socialist left (Barbara Lee, Raúl Grijalva and the Congressional Progressive Caucus) and traditional liberals (Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Debbie Wasserman Schultz) to the Dem center-right (Harry Reid, and the NDN) to the GOP-style conservative right (Blue Dog Coalition) to the pragmatic "centrist" moderate- to-liberal style (Mark Warner, Rahm Emanuel). The Democrats swept into office in '06 and '08 include a combination of some vocal progressives on the left, some centrists, and a some conservatives on the party's right. Much of the party's congressional losses in 2010 came at the expense of Blue Dog and centrist Democrats in swing districts. In 2012, President Obama was reelected and the Democrats held control of the US Senate and narrowed the GOP majority in the US House. Other official, affiliated national Democratic sites include: Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, and House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer. Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC), and US Senate Democratic Leadership. Democratic Governors Association (DGA).
    [Show full text]
  • Advertising Effects in Presidential Elections Brett R
    Vol. 32, No. 1, January–February 2013, pp. 19–35 ISSN 0732-2399 (print) ISSN 1526-548X (online) http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1120.0745 © 2013 INFORMS Advertising Effects in Presidential Elections Brett R. Gordon Columbia Business School, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, [email protected] Wesley R. Hartmann Stanford Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, [email protected] residential elections provide both an important context in which to study advertising and a setting that Pmitigates the challenges of dynamics and endogeneity. We use the 2000 and 2004 general elections to analyze the effect of market-level advertising on county-level vote shares. The results indicate significant positive effects of advertising exposures. Both instrumental variables and fixed effects alter the ad coefficient. Advertising elasticities are smaller than are typical for branded goods yet significant enough to shift election outcomes. For example, if advertising were set to zero and all other factors held constant, three states’ electoral votes would have changed parties in 2000. Given the narrow margin of victory in 2000, this shift would have resulted in a different president. Key words: advertising; politics; instrumental variables; presidential elections History: Received: June 15, 2011; accepted: August 21, 2012; Preyas Desai served as the editor-in-chief and Miguel Villas-Boas served as associate editor for this article. Published online in Articles in Advance November 30, 2012. 1. Introduction We examine advertising effectiveness in presiden- Advertising is ubiquitous. In 2008, firms spent tial elections, potentially one of the most important roughly $65 billion on television advertising for a contexts in which to study advertising.
    [Show full text]