Methodology Report and User's Guide for the 2008-2009 ANES Panel Study

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Methodology Report and User's Guide for the 2008-2009 ANES Panel Study Methodology Report and User’s Guide for the 2008–2009 ANES Panel Study August 2010 (Revised September 22, 2010) (Revised December 13, 2010) Matthew DeBell Jon A. Krosnick Arthur Lupia American National Election Studies Stanford University and the University of Michigan This document may be freely copied or redistributed, provided it is not altered. Suggested Citation Matthew DeBell, Jon A. Krosnick, and Arthur Lupia. 2010. Methodology Report and User’s Guide for the 2008–2009 ANES Panel Study. Palo Alto, CA, and Ann Arbor, MI: Stanford University and the University of Michigan. Acknowledgments This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Nos. SES- 0535332 and SES-0535334. ANES is also supported by Stanford University and the University of Michigan. Sections of this report may reprint previous documentation of the American National Election Studies without explicit attribution. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation, Stanford University, or the University of Michigan. The ANES Principal Investigators for the Panel Study were Jon A. Krosnick at Stanford University and Arthur Lupia at the University of Michigan. Vincent Hutchings at the University of Michigan was Associate Principal Investigator. The Panel Study director was Matthew DeBell. ANES staff on the study were Caroline Roberts, Jaime Ventura, and Jonathan Cowden, with additional support from Darrell Donakowski, Catherine Wilson, Pat Luevano, Heather Branton, Laurie Pierson, and David Howell. Research assistance at Stanford was provided by Wendy Gross, Farah Giga, Gaurav Sood, Lucila Figueroa, Mackenzie Israel-Trummel, Yo-Yo Chen, Helen Chen, Troy Wu, Jade Wang, Logan Ensign, Peter Tu, Abiy Teshome, and Mario Suntanu, with some additional ad hoc support from Autumn Carter, Mai El-Sadany, Lucinda Gibbs, Natasha Kim, Andy Nguyen, Deborah Oh, Noelle Spring, and Elaine Albertson. Research assistance at the University of Michigan was provided by Mi Hwa Hong, Yanna Krupnikov, Adam Levine, Spencer Piston, Alex Von Hagen-Jamar, Nazia Kahn, Mary Nameth, and Willo Jean-Baptiste. Knowledge Networks, Inc., performed the data collection and managed panel relations under a contract with Stanford University. Larry Osborn was the Knowledge Networks study director. Mike Dennis was the Knowledge Networks Principal Investigator. They were supported by a team including Melanie Thomas, Karen Semans, Naomi Keller, Tetyana Shvets, Charles DiSogra, Elisa Chan, Leticia Maciel, Xiaolu Tan, Xiuli Tang, Erlina Hendarwan, Mark Shanosky, and Alex Nagaev. Questionnaire content was contributed by participants in the ANES Online Commons. The members of the ANES Board of Overseers contributing to the Panel Study and reviewing Online Commons proposals were John Mark Hansen (chair), John Aldrich, Stephen Ansolabehere, Henry Brady, Brandice Canes-Wrone, Karen Cook, Catherine Eckel, Kenneth Goldstein, Donald Green, Vincent Hutchings, Paula McClain, Kathleen McGraw, Walter Mebane, Randy Olsen, Richard Petty, Gary Segura, Daron Shaw, V. Kerry Smith, Lynn Smith-Lovin, and Paul Sniderman. We are grateful for additional advice, comments, and collaboration pertinent to questionnaire development from Clark McCauley, Lynn Smith-Lovin, Keith Payne, Charles Judd, Mark Chaves, Paul Gronke, Ken Wald, Stanley Feldman, Neil Malhotra, Adam Glynn, Gary Segura, Ken Goldstein, Tony Greenwald, N. Sriram, Brian Nosek, Chappell Lawson, and many others. Contact The ANES website address is http://www.electionstudies.org. Any questions not answered on the ANES website or by this report may be directed to ANES staff by email at [email protected] 2 Contents 1. Introduction..................................................................................................................... 5 Panel Study Overview..................................................................................................... 5 “Full Release” of the Panel Data .................................................................................... 6 ANES Content and “Off-Wave” Content ....................................................................... 6 Panel Study at a glance ................................................................................................... 7 2. Survey Questions ............................................................................................................ 8 Online Commons ............................................................................................................ 8 Surveys on non-political topics: the “off-waves” ........................................................... 9 ANES Question Design, Development, and Pilot Testing ........................................... 11 Questionnaires and Wave Maps.................................................................................... 12 3. Sample Design and Recruitment Procedures................................................................ 18 Population and Sample ................................................................................................. 18 Household/Telephone Sample Design.......................................................................... 18 Person-Sampling Procedures ........................................................................................ 19 4. Data Collection Procedures........................................................................................... 26 Profile Survey ............................................................................................................... 26 Monthly Survey Procedures.......................................................................................... 26 Timeline and Sequence of Interviews........................................................................... 28 5. Data Processing............................................................................................................. 39 Cleaning and Quality Control ....................................................................................... 39 Administrative Variables .............................................................................................. 40 Derived Variables ......................................................................................................... 42 Disclosure Edits ............................................................................................................ 42 File-Build Program ....................................................................................................... 43 6. Recruitment Dispositions and Outcome Rates ............................................................. 44 Outcome Rates Defined ................................................................................................ 44 Calculating Final Dispositions...................................................................................... 45 Final Dispositions ......................................................................................................... 47 Estimating Eligibility.................................................................................................... 49 Response Rates and other Outcome Rates.................................................................... 50 7. Panel Retention ............................................................................................................. 52 Interviews at Each Stage............................................................................................... 52 Dropout Recovery......................................................................................................... 53 Retention Summaries.................................................................................................... 56 Retention Matrix ........................................................................................................... 67 Attrition Effects ............................................................................................................ 71 8. Weights ......................................................................................................................... 73 9. Accuracy of Estimates ................................................................................................ 78 10. Validation of Respondents & Data ............................................................................. 83 11. Analyzing the Data with Weights and Correct Significance Testing ......................... 89 Selecting Appropriate Weights..................................................................................... 89 Running Weighted Analysis ......................................................................................... 93 Statistical Significance Testing and Standard Errors.................................................... 93 12. Orientation to the Data File......................................................................................... 95 3 Cases on the file............................................................................................................ 95 File formats ................................................................................................................... 95 Variables on the file...................................................................................................... 95 Combining data from branched questions ...................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Remembering Katie Reich
    THE M NARCH Volume 18 Number 1 • Serving the Archbishop Mitty Community • Oct 2008 Remembering Katie Reich Teacher, Mentor, Coach, Friend Katie Hatch Reich, beloved Biology and Environmental Science teacher and cross-country coach, was diagnosed with melanoma on April 1, 2008. She passed away peacefully at home on October 3, 2008. While the Mitty community mourns the loss of this loving teacher, coach, and friend, they also look back in remembrance on the profound infl uence Ms. Reich’s life had on them. “Katie’s passions were apparent to all “We have lost an angel on our campus. “My entire sophomore year, I don’t think “Every new teacher should be blessed to who knew her in the way she spoke, her Katie Reich was an inspiration and a mentor I ever saw Ms. Reich not smiling. Even after have a teacher like Katie Reich to learn from. hobbies, even her key chains. Her personal to many of our students. What bothers me is she was diagnosed with cancer, I remember Her mind was always working to improve key chain had a beetle that had been encased the fact that so many of our future students her coming back to class one day, jumping up lessons and try new things. She would do in acrylic. I recall her enthusiasm for it and will never have the opportunity to learn on her desk, crossing her legs like a little kid anything to help students understand biology wonder as she asked me, “Isn’t it beautiful?!” about biology, learn about our earth, or learn and asking us, “Hey! Anyone got any questions because she knew that only then could she On her work keys, Katie had typed up her about life from this amazing person.
    [Show full text]
  • Nr 5. Michał Rzepecki, Amerykańskie Prawybory Prezydenckie
    Biuletyn Międzynarodowy Instytutu Nauk Politycznych i Stosunków Międzynarodowych Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Redakcja: Piotr Bajor (red. naczelny), Olga Plaze, Patrycja Lipold Opiekun naukowy: dr hab. Michał Chorośnicki, prof. UJ. Kontakt: ul. Jabłonkowskich 5, 31-007 Kraków e-mail: [email protected] Nr 5 (5), luty 2008 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Michał Rzepecki Amerykańskie prawybory prezydenckie W 2008 roku w wielu państwach świata odbędą się wybory, które często będą miały duże znaczenie dla sytuacji politycznej w danym regionie. Jednak nigdzie indziej, tak jak w Stanach Zjednoczonych, od wyników wyborów nie zależy tak wiele. Ich wynik będzie miał wpływ nie tylko na to, którą drogą podążać będzie Ameryka, ale także na wydarzenia w skali globalnej. Od tego, kto zostanie nowym gospodarzem Białego Domu – przywódcą jedynego światowego mocarstwa – uwarunkowane są losy całego świata. W świetle konstytucji Stanów Zjednoczonych kandydat na prezydenta musi być obywatelem amerykańskim urodzonym w Stanach, mieć ukończone 35 lat i mieszkać, od co najmniej 14 lat na terenie USA. Takie same wymagania dotyczą także kandydata na wiceprezydenta. Co więcej nie może on pochodzić z tego samego stanu co kandydat na prezydenta. Prezydent USA wybierany jest w wyborach pośrednich. Data wyborów przypada zawsze w pierwszy wtorek, po pierwszym poniedziałku listopada. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Quotes from Co-Signers of Garrett's Iran Letter to President
    QUOTES FROM CO-SIGNERS OF GARRETT’S IRAN LETTER TO PRESIDENT BUSH Walter Jones ● Authored A Letter With Democrat Rep. Keith Ellison Encouraging Negotiations With Iran In 2012, Jones Signed A Letter With Democrat Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN) Encouraging Negotiations With Iran. “We strongly encourage your Administration to pursue bilateral and multilateral engagement with Iran. While we acknowledge that progress will be difficult, we believe that robust, sustained diplomacy is the best option to resolve our serious concerns about Iran's nuclear program, and to prevent a costly war that would be devastating for the United States and our allies in the region.” (Walter B. Jones and Keith Ellison, Letter, 3/2/12) ● Extreme Minority Of House Members To Vote Against Additional Sanctions On Iran In 2012, The House Passed Additional Sanctions Against Iran's Energy, Shipping, and Insurance Sectors. “Both houses of Congress approved legislation on Wednesday that would significantly tighten sanctions against Iran's energy, shipping and insurance sectors. The bill is the latest attempt by Congress to starve Iran of the hard currency it needs to fund what most members agree is Iran's ongoing attempt to develop a nuclear weapons program.” (Pete Kasperowicz, “House, Senate Approve Tougher Sanctions Against Iran, Syria,” The Hill's Floor Action, 8/1/12) One Of Only Six House Members To Vote Against The 2012 Sanctions Bill. “The sanctions bill was approved in the form of a resolution making changes to prior legislation, H.R. 1905, on which the House and Senate agreed — it passed in an 421-6 vote, and was opposed by just five Republicans and one Democrat.
    [Show full text]
  • Suffolk University Virginia General Election Voters SUPRC Field
    Suffolk University Virginia General Election Voters AREA N= 600 100% DC Area ........................................ 1 ( 1/ 98) 164 27% West ........................................... 2 51 9% Piedmont Valley ................................ 3 134 22% Richmond South ................................. 4 104 17% East ........................................... 5 147 25% START Hello, my name is __________ and I am conducting a survey for Suffolk University and I would like to get your opinions on some political questions. We are calling Virginia households statewide. Would you be willing to spend three minutes answering some brief questions? <ROTATE> or someone in that household). N= 600 100% Continue ....................................... 1 ( 1/105) 600 100% GEND RECORD GENDER N= 600 100% Male ........................................... 1 ( 1/106) 275 46% Female ......................................... 2 325 54% S2 S2. Thank You. How likely are you to vote in the Presidential Election on November 4th? N= 600 100% Very likely .................................... 1 ( 1/107) 583 97% Somewhat likely ................................ 2 17 3% Not very/Not at all likely ..................... 3 0 0% Other/Undecided/Refused ........................ 4 0 0% Q1 Q1. Which political party do you feel closest to - Democrat, Republican, or Independent? N= 600 100% Democrat ....................................... 1 ( 1/110) 269 45% Republican ..................................... 2 188 31% Independent/Unaffiliated/Other ................. 3 141 24% Not registered
    [Show full text]
  • Giuliani, 9/11 and the 2008 Race
    ABC NEWS/WASHINGTON POST POLL: ‘08 ELECTION UPDATE EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE AFTER 11:35 p.m. Tuesday, Sept. 11, 2007 Giuliani, 9/11 and the 2008 Race Six years after the terrorist attacks that vaulted him to national prominence, it’s unclear whether 9/11 will lift Rudy Giuliani all the way to the presidency: He remains hamstrung in the Republican base, and his overall support for his party’s nomination has slipped in the latest ABC News/Washington Post poll. Giuliani does better with Republicans who are concerned about another major terrorist attack in this country, a legacy of his 9/11 performance. But among those less focused on terrorism, he’s in a dead heat against newcomer Fred Thompson. Thompson also challenges Giuliani among conservatives and evangelical white Protestants – base groups in the Republican constituency – while John McCain has stabilized after a decline in support. Giuliani still leads, but his support is down by nine points in this poll from his level in July. Indeed this is the first ABC/Post poll this cycle in which Giuliani had less than a double- digit lead over all his competitors: He now leads Thompson by nine points (and McCain by 10). Among Republicans and Republican-leaning independents, 28 percent support Giuliani, 19 percent Thompson, 18 percent McCain and 10 percent Mitt Romney. Other candidates remain in the low single digits. (There’s no significant difference among registered voters – and plenty of time to register.) ’08 Republican primary preferences Now July June April Feb Giuliani 28% 37 34 35 53 Thompson 19 15 13 10 NA McCain 18 16 20 22 23 Romney 10 8 10 10 5 The Democratic race, meanwhile, remains exceedingly stable; Hillary Clinton has led Barack Obama by 14 to 16 points in each ABC/Post poll since February, and still does.
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Ballot
    SAMPLE BALLOT SKAGIT COUNTY WA GENERAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 2, 2004 INSTRUCTIONS 1. Only use pencil to mark your ballot. PROPOSED TO THE LEGISLATURE STATE STATE 2. You must completely blacken the oval to AND REFERRED TO THE PEOPLE: INITIATIVE TO THE LEGISLATURE 297 the left of your desired selection. Initiative Measure No. 297 concerns GOVERNOR ATTORNEY GENERAL "mixed" radioactive and nonradioactive 4 Year Term 4 Year Term 3. To write-in a candidate you must write hazardous waste. This measure would Vote For One Vote For One their name and party on the line provided add new provisions concerning "mixed" under the desired position. radioactive and nonradioactive hazardous waste, requiring cleanup of contamination 4. Do not make any identifying marks on before additional waste is added, Christine Gregoire D Deborah Senn D your ballot. prioritizing cleanup, providing for public participation and enforcement through ABBREVIATION POLITICAL PARTY citizen lawsuits. Dino Rossi R Rob McKenna R D Democratic Should this measure be enacted into law? R Republican L Libertarian Ruth Bennett L J. Bradley Gibson L WW Workers World Yes G Green SW Socialist Workers Paul Richmond G C Constitution No SE Socialist Equality Write-in I Independent Candidate NP Nonpartisan Write-in PROPOSED BY INITIATIVE PETITION: FEDERAL LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR INITIATIVE TO THE PEOPLE 872 4 Year Term Initiative Measure No. 872 concerns Vote For One elections for partisan offices. This PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC LANDS measure would allow voters to select OF THE UNITED STATES 4 Year Term among all candidates in a primary. 4 Year Term Vote For One Ballots would indicate candidates' party Vote For One Brad Owen D preference.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hilltop 11-2-2004 Magazine
    Howard University Digital Howard @ Howard University The iH lltop: 2000 - 2010 The iH lltop Digital Archive 11-2-2004 The iH lltop 11-2-2004 Magazine Hilltop Staff Follow this and additional works at: https://dh.howard.edu/hilltop_0010 Recommended Citation Staff, Hilltop, "The iH lltop 11-2-2004 Magazine" (2004). The Hilltop: 2000 - 2010. 199. https://dh.howard.edu/hilltop_0010/199 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the The iH lltop Digital Archive at Digital Howard @ Howard University. It has been accepted for inclusion in The iH lltop: 2000 - 2010 by an authorized administrator of Digital Howard @ Howard University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Hilltop THE BATTLE: IN AN EPIC BA TILE FOR --:J:n~.r l!liiM1 STANDING BY YOUR MAN: ALWAYS AGREE WITH THEIR RUNNING MATES, BUT THEY MUST STAND BEHIND IHEIR~- . PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE AND SUPPORT THEM IF THEY WILL BECOME VICE PRESIDENT. Bush and Kerry battle II out for the iob • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • t Kerry and Bush t i J:ompared. •' 'I l •I •I • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • FILEPHOTO -1<now who else ~ Is on the ballet. •• ••••••••• The second in Charge: THE VICE PRESIDENT FILE PHOTO • • • • • • • • The money Find out how • • Spent on the The Electoral • • Campaign College Vote • • Works • FILE PHOTO • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 't ... • • • • Do you know • • Who your • • Senior is? • • FILE PHOTO FILE PHOTO • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Three US Supreme Justices to retire soon MAGAZINE DESIGNED BY ARION JAMERSON I ~ • • • • • •I ,• • • I • I • • • I I • • • • • t .... .. .... FILE PHOTOS The Battle to Become President of the United States ofAme rica • BY NAKIA HILL to the Republican and Democratic Bush had four years to do some­ Conventions and both candidates thing anything to make life bet­ Millions of United States positions.
    [Show full text]
  • Updates from PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE VIRGIL GOODE…
    Monday, September 24, 2012 Volume 1, Issue 10 Updates from presidential Articles… candidate virgil goode… Goode Updates - page 1 Goode in the Media - page 1 Last week I traveled to Newark, Ohio for the From the Chairman - page 2 Constitution Party State Convention chaired by Candidate’s Corner - page 2 Don Shrader. National Vice Chairman, Randy Natl. Conference Calls - page 2 Stufflebeam, attended and introduced me. Don, Randy, and I focused on the differences between the Constitution Party on the one Congressman Goode with "Romney" and "Obama" as hand and the Democratic and Republican parties they prepare for the John Stossel interview. Mr. Stossel allowed "Romney" and "Obama" to be on on the other. Those in attendance were urged to the questioning panel, but said they had so much air work hard between now and Election Day. time they did not need a speaking roll. On the Thursday prior to the Ohio Constitution Party Convention, I and Vice Presidential candidate Jim Clymer attended the Institute on the Constitution in Pasadena, Maryland, hosted by 2004 Constitution Party Presidential Candidate Michael Peroutka. 2008 Constitu- tion Party Presidential Candidate, Chuck Baldwin, also attended the Institute and spoke ear- lier in the day. On Tuesday, I was in New York for the taping of the John Stossel show, which was aired on September 13. After the Stossel interview and forum, I appeared live on the Lawrence The CP prevailed at our O'Donnell show. I attended a number of events last week, including government classes hearing before the New meeting at E.C. Glass High School in Lynchburg, Virginia which were covered by both the Hampshire Ballot Law National Associated Press and the Washington Post.
    [Show full text]
  • Boulder County, Colorado Registration and Turnout
    Boulder County, Colorado 2004 NOVEMBER GENERAL ELECTION November 2, 2004 Official Results for Election - 11/17/2004 2:15:00 PM Registration and Turnout Completed Precincts: 230 of 230 Reg/Turnout Percentage Total Registered Voters 176224 Precinct Ballots Cast 89886 51.0% Early Ballots Cast 42183 23.9% Absentee Ballots Cast 27943 15.9% Total Ballots Cast 160012 90.8% Registration and Turnout Boulder County-All Precincts Completed Precincts: 227 of 227 Reg/Turnout Percentage Total Registered Voters 176140 Precinct Ballots Cast 89883 51.0% Early Ballots Cast 42180 23.9% Absentee Ballots Cast 27664 15.7% Total Ballots Cast 159727 90.7% Registration and Turnout City of Lafayette Completed Precincts: 19 of 19 Reg/Turnout Percentage Total Registered Voters 13245 Precinct Ballots Cast 6940 52.4% Early Ballots Cast 2729 20.6% Absentee Ballots Cast 2281 17.2% Total Ballots Cast 11950 90.2% Registration and Turnout City of Longmont Completed Precincts: 54 of 54 Reg/Turnout Percentage Total Registered Voters 41021 Precinct Ballots Cast 21238 51.8% Early Ballots Cast 8674 21.1% Absentee Ballots Cast 7071 17.2% Total Ballots Cast 36983 90.2% Registration and Turnout City of Louisville Completed Precincts: 18 of 18 Reg/Turnout Percentage Total Registered Voters 11849 Precinct Ballots Cast 5010 42.3% Early Ballots Cast 3742 31.6% Absentee Ballots Cast 2201 18.6% Total Ballots Cast 10953 92.4% Registration and Turnout Eldorado Springs Local Improv Dist Completed Precincts: 2 of 2 Reg/Turnout Percentage Total Registered Voters 193 Precinct Ballots Cast
    [Show full text]
  • Marxism, History and Socialist Consciousness: a Reply by David North to Alex Steiner and Frank Brenner
    Marxism, History and Socialist Consciousness: A Reply by David North to Alex Steiner and Frank Brenner Dear Comrades Steiner and Brenner: The International Committee of the Fourth International (ICFI) has asked that I reply to your document, “Objectivism or Marxism,” on its behalf. This is a task that I undertake with a certain degree of regret. Notwithstanding the different paths our lives have taken over the past three decades, I retain warm recollections of the time when we worked closely together within the movement. However, that was very long ago, and your latest document serves only to underscore what your various writings over the past several years have made increasingly apparent: that you have traveled very far politically from Marxism, the political heritage of the Trotskyist movement, and the ICFI. This inescapable political reality must determine the content and the tone of this reply. Your letter begins by protesting that the ICFI has failed to answer your previous documents, from which you draw the most disturbing conclusions: The ICFI suffers from “an aversion to criticism” that is “symptomatic of deeper problems within the movement that every member and supporter of the IC should be concerned about.” The leadership of the movement “stonewalls political debate,” and seeks “to quell discussion in order to insulate itself from criticism.” Our alleged failure to respond to your documents “only underscores how alien a practice genuinely critical debate has become within the movement.” To the uninformed observer, the situation you describe can only evoke images of a besieged opposition tendency in a dictatorial political party, battling against a bureaucratic regime’s suppression of its democratic right to be heard by the rank-and-file membership.
    [Show full text]
  • Storm May Bring Snow to Valley Floor
    Mendo women Rotarians plan ON THE MARKET fall to Solano Super Bowl bash Guide to local real estate .............Page A-6 ............Page A-3 ......................................Inside INSIDE Mendocino County’s Obituaries The Ukiah local newspaper ..........Page 2 Tomorrow: Rain High 45º Low 41º 7 58551 69301 0 FRIDAY Jan. 25, 2008 50 cents tax included DAILY JOURNAL ukiahdailyjournal.com 38 pages, Volume 149 Number 251 email: [email protected] Storm may bring snow to valley floor By ZACK SAMPSEL but with low pressure systems from and BEN BROWN Local agriculture not expected to sustain damage the Gulf of Alaska moving in one The Daily Journal after another the cycle remains the A second round of winter storms the valley floor, but the weather is not the county will experience scattered ing routine for some Mendocino same each day. lining up to hit Mendocino County expected to be a threat to agriculture. showers today with more mountain County residents. The previous low pressure system today is expected to bring more rain, According to reports from the snow to the north in higher eleva- Slight afternoon warmups have cold temperatures and snow as low as National Weather Service, most of tions, which has been the early-morn- helped to make midday travel easier, See STORM, Page A-12 GRACE HUDSON MUSEUM READIES NEW EXHIBIT Kucinich’s wife cancels planned stop in Hopland By ROB BURGESS The Daily Journal Hey, guess what? Kucinich quits Elizabeth Kucinich is coming to Mendocino campaign for County. Wait. Hold on. No, White House actually she isn’t. Associated In what should be a Press familiar tale to perennial- Democrat ly disappointed support- Dennis Kuci- ers of Democratic presi- nich is aban- dential aspirant Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Calendar No. 603
    Union Calendar No. 603 110TH CONGRESS " ! REPORT 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 110–930 ACTIVITIES OF THE COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS FIRST AND SECOND SESSIONS 2007–2008 Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/congress/ index.html http://www.house.gov/reform JANUARY 2, 2009.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed VerDate Aug 31 2005 01:57 Jan 03, 2009 Jkt 046108 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6012 Sfmt 6012 E:\HR\OC\HR930.XXX HR930 smartinez on PROD1PC64 with REPORTS congress.#13 ACTIVITIES REPORT OF THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM VerDate Aug 31 2005 01:57 Jan 03, 2009 Jkt 046108 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6019 Sfmt 6019 E:\HR\OC\HR930.XXX HR930 smartinez on PROD1PC64 with REPORTS with PROD1PC64 on smartinez 1 Union Calendar No. 603 110TH CONGRESS " ! REPORT 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 110–930 ACTIVITIES OF THE COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS FIRST AND SECOND SESSIONS 2007–2008 Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/congress/ index.html http://www.house.gov/reform JANUARY 2, 2009.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 46–108 WASHINGTON : 2009 VerDate Aug 31 2005 01:57 Jan 03, 2009 Jkt 046108 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4012 Sfmt 4012 E:\HR\OC\HR930.XXX HR930 smartinez on PROD1PC64 with REPORTS congress.#13 COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM HENRY A.
    [Show full text]