DOCSLIB.ORG

Source: Minnesota Legislative Manual 2005/2006 Chapter Minnesota Votes Chapter Eight

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Source: Minnesota Legislative Manual 2005/2006 Chapter Minnesota Votes Chapter Eight This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/mngov/electionresults.aspx Chapter Eight Minnesota Votes WINNING PARTY FOR PRESIDENT BY PRECINCT NOVEMBER 2, 2004 GENERAL ELECTION Metro area 290 Eight Votes Minnesota Source: Minnesota Legislative Manual 2005/2006 Chapter Minnesota Votes Chapter Eight WINNING PARTY FOR U.S. REPRESENTATIVE BY PRECINCT NOVEMBER 2, 2004 GENERAL ELECTION Metro area 291 Eight Votes Minnesota Chapter Chapter Eight Minnesota Votes STATE SENATE DISTRICTS BY PARTY, JANUARY 3, 2005 292 Eight Votes Minnesota Chapter Minnesota Votes Chapter Eight STATE SENATE DISTRICTS BY PARTY, JANUARY 3, 2005 Metro area 293 Eight Votes Minnesota Chapter Chapter Eight Minnesota Votes STATE HOUSE DISTRICTS BY PARTY, JANUARY 3, 2005 294 Eight Votes Minnesota Chapter Minnesota Votes Chapter Eight STATE HOUSE DISTRICTS BY PARTY, JANUARY 3, 2005 Metro area 295 Eight Votes Minnesota Chapter Chapter Eight Minnesota Votes VOTING SYSTEMS USED BY PRECINCT NOVEMBER 2, 2004 GENERAL ELECTION Hand Counted: Ballots are counted by hand after the polls close (roughly 17% of polling places, containing 4% of voters) Centrally Counted Optical Scan: Ballots are scanned and tabulated at a central location in the county after the polls close (roughly 37% of precincts, containing 16% of voters) Precinct-Based Optical Scan: Voters put their ballots into a scanner in the polling place (roughly 46% of polling places, containing 80% of voters); instantaneous tabulation at poll closing time 296 Eight Votes Minnesota Chapter Minnesota Votes Chapter Eight NOVEMBER 2, 2004 STATE GENERAL ELECTION VOTER REGISTRATION AND VOTER PARTICIPATION BY COUNTY ABSENTEE ABSENTEE ABSENTEE REGISTERED REGISTERED ON BALLOTS BALLOTS BALLOTS TOTAL COUNTY AS OF 7AM ELECTION DAY REGULAR FEDERAL PRESIDENT VOTING AITKIN 9,937 1,573 997 9 0 9,533 ANOKA 170,686 38,124 9,286 169 13 174,258 BECKER 17,414 3,253 1,610 11 0 17,047 BELTRAMI 20,889 5,519 1,456 22 0 21,426 BENTON 18,234 5,279 935 9 0 18,626 BIG STONE 3,245 386 841 8 0 3,082 BLUE EARTH 31,151 8,345 1,860 34 2 33,332 BROWN 15,373 2,626 884 7 1 13,961 CARLTON 17,833 3,616 1,327 0 0 18,487 CARVER 46,860 8,833 3,304 3 7 45,556 CASS 17,114 2,826 1,863 9 5 16,058 CHIPPEWA 7,084 1,196 508 8 0 6,678 CHISAGO 29,341 6,729 1,613 2 9 28,497 CLAY 29,080 7,048 1,947 3 3 27,846 CLEARWATER 4,756 797 331 3 0 4,406 COOK 3,370 372 285 4 1 3,321 COTTONWOOD 6,801 1,019 457 3 0 6,456 CROW WING 35,049 6,428 3,356 9 3 33,666 DAKOTA 217,954 45,100 18,792 98 15 216,181 DODGE 10,217 2,220 495 0 0 10,017 DOUGLAS 21,172 3,418 1,988 0 0 20,430 FARIBAULT 9,341 1,257 677 3 0 8,789 FILLMORE 12,647 2,115 675 1 0 11,798 FREEBORN 18,918 2,975 1,509 1 1 17,775 GOODHUE 27,285 4,991 1,785 12 6 25,758 GRANT 4,206 574 364 2 0 3,841 HENNEPIN 692,450 132,092 65,386 1,041 161 647,912 HOUSTON 11,933 1,970 679 3 1 11,173 HUBBARD 11,842 2,019 1,275 1 0 11,458 ISANTI 18,939 4,500 1,109 3 0 19,368 ITASCA 25,813 4,067 1,669 0 0 24,638 JACKSON 6,317 840 451 6 4 5,881 KANABEC 8,324 1,935 527 0 0 8,351 KANDIYOHI 23,130 4,107 1,777 3 0 21,749 KITTSON 3,026 211 229 7 0 2,727 KOOCHICHING 7,884 1,364 681 30 0 7,402 LAC QUI PARLE 4,929 552 396 0 0 4,571 LAKE 7,509 1,041 634 1 2 7,135 LAKE OF THE WOODS 2,665 219 200 1 0 2,422 LE SUEUR 15,105 2,951 758 0 0 14,573 LINCOLN 3,770 431 230 0 0 3,407 LYON 14,357 2,450 949 0 2 12,782 MCLEOD 19,433 4,165 919 5 0 18,508 MAHNOMEN 2,791 439 172 0 0 2,526 MARSHALL 5,695 866 311 3 5 5,648 MARTIN 12,182 1,825 915 0 5 11,227 MEEKER 13,170 2,033 805 3 0 12,500 MILLE LACS 13,109 3,273 801 4 0 13,189 MORRISON 19,053 2,431 1,138 55 3 16,945 MOWER 20,975 3,456 1,738 18 3 20,357 MURRAY 5,521 647 881 0 2 5,054 NICOLLET 19,099 4,192 967 20 0 17,865 NOBLES 10,478 1,285 697 5 2 9,399 NORMAN 4,094 596 312 1 0 3,850 OLMSTED 75,684 15,858 6,722 27 12 72,172 OTTER TAIL 34,168 5,728 3,188 0 9 32,356 PENNINGTON 7,241 1,670 516 3 5 7,057 PINE 16,587 1,980 896 8 0 14,601 PIPESTONE 5,431 694 473 3 0 5,074 POLK 16,134 3,086 1,045 0 1 15,870 POPE 6,822 1,280 716 11 0 6,911 RAMSEY 303,203 57,628 23,010 292 61 273,223 RED LAKE 2,329 435 173 0 0 2,200 REDWOOD 8,614 1,344 539 2 0 8,242 RENVILLE 8,942 1,505 523 4 0 8,495 RICE 34,822 6,719 2,050 13 1 31,004 ROCK 5,518 822 501 0 0 5,248 ROSEAU 8,219 1,685 570 9 2 7,976 SAINT LOUIS 130,250 21,215 8,049 3 1 120,644 SCOTT 58,613 14,083 4,240 91 8 60,797 SHERBURNE 40,521 10,092 2,632 13 7 41,588 SIBLEY 8,630 1,195 367 0 0 8,001 STEARNS 80,095 19,536 3,903 31 4 76,338 STEELE 19,165 4,031 1,307 45 1 18,904 STEVENS 7,001 1,258 375 26 0 6,021 SWIFT 5,904 957 440 26 0 5,787 TODD 13,380 2,247 747 0 0 12,387 TRAVERSE 2,214 279 178 2 0 2,189 WABASHA 12,560 2,217 675 0 0 11,972 WADENA 7,712 1,320 528 4 2 7,143 WASECA 10,330 1,899 646 29 0 9,930 WASHINGTON 133,857 23,817 12,184 76 6 128,622 WATONWAN 6,268 857 439 1 0 5,629 WILKIN 3,694 595 305 5 0 3,569 WINONA 29,564 7,863 1,292 173 0 27,815 WRIGHT 58,292 14,460 3,384 32 4 59,885 YELLOW MEDICINE 6,182 973 396 1 1 5,820 TOTAL 2,977,496 581,904 228,760 2,570 381 2,842,912 307 Eight Votes Minnesota Chapter Chapter Eight Minnesota Votes VOTE FOR PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT BY COUNTY NOVEMBER 2, 2004 GENERAL ELECTION GP R DFL SEP SWP CFP BL CP LIB COBB BUSH KERRY VAN AUKEN CALERO HARENS NADER PEROUTKA BADNARIK AND AND AND AND AND AND AND AND AND LAMARCHE CHENEY EDWARDS LAWRENCE HAWKINS RYAN CAMEJO BALDWIN CAMPAGNA COUNTY AITKIN 11 4,768 4,539 2 3 11 75 16 14 ANOKA 232 91,853 80,226 22 17 123 978 197 272 BECKER 21 9,795 6,756 5 2 17 143 23 28 BELTRAMI 66 10,237 10,592 7 4 20 131 22 32 BENTON 40 10,043 8,059 3 2 19 140 26 32 BIG STONE 4 1,483 1,536 0 0 6 26 5 3 BLUE EARTH 65 15,737 16,865 8 1 39 276 38 49 BROWN 33 8,395 5,158 4 4 11 117 20 13 CARLTON 29 6,642 11,462 4 1 15 118 24 14 CARVER 65 28,510 16,456 7 1 16 222 28 71 CASS 25 8,875 6,835 2 3 14 113 12 17 CHIPPEWA 12 3,089 3,424 3 0 14 46 6 6 CHISAGO 39 15,705 12,219 3 1 30 166 41 45 CLAY 65 14,365 12,989 4 2 17 201 28 45 CLEARWATER 3 2,438 1,871 1 0 1 34 5 4 COOK 9 1,489 1,733 1 0 4 41 12 8 COTTONWOOD 10 3,557 2,726 1 4 8 50 5 2 CROW WING 55 19,106 14,005 4 1 15 259 34 49 DAKOTA 237 108,959 104,635 35 20 128 1,109 204 334 DODGE 15 5,593 4,117 3 0 8 87 29 10 DOUGLAS 42 11,793 8,219 5 3 16 195 11 11 FARIBAULT 12 4,794 3,767 4 5 10 59 21 6 FILLMORE 16 5,694 5,825 0 0 17 91 32 14 FREEBORN 36 7,681 9,733 7 5 20 136 18 18 GOODHUE 49 13,134 12,103 4 6 25 209 28 37 GRANT 12 1,893 1,856 1 1 1 31 11 7 HENNEPIN 942 255,133 383,841 103 111 402 4,008 428 1380 HOUSTON 16 5,631 5,276 2 4 11 93 26 14 HUBBARD 20 6,444 4,741 4 0 12 92 10 11 ISANTI 25 11,190 7,883 2 3 19 112 29 31 ITASCA 56 10,705 13,290 5 3 29 171 57 38 JACKSON 4 3,024 2,652 3 3 10 60 13 7 KANABEC 21 4,527 3,592 0 1 16 58 16 12 KANDIYOHI 33 11,704 9,337 8 0 31 155 22 39 KITTSON 3 1,307 1,333 0 0 4 26 3 1 KOOCHICHING 17 3,539 3,662 1 0 0 56 12 15 LAC QUI PARLE 8 2,093 2,390 1 0 4 36 4 5 LAKE 10 2,769 4,212 1 2 8 44 10 9 LAKE OF THE WOODS 6 1,428 921 1 0 2 27 5 4 LE SUEUR 38 7,746 6,466 3 6 10 103 20 17 LINCOLN 4 1,736 1,558 2 1 1 27 5 5 LYON 20 7,203 5,292 4 3 14 88 23 15 MCLEOD 31 11,407 6,712 2 2 30 132 62 11 MAHNOMEN 8 1,132 1,339 2 1 4 18 2 1 MARSHALL 8 3,187 2,308 2 3 8 36 6 0 MARTIN 20 6,311 4,590 3 0 17 67 24 9 MEEKER 17 6,854 5,292 1 0 14 94 43 19 MILLE LACS 30 7,194 5,677 5 3 13 110 19 14 MORRISON 32 9,698 6,794 6 6 20 152 24 25 MOWER 30 7,591 12,334 5 3 29 153 36 23 MURRAY 10 2,719 2,218 1 0 6 34 3 2 NICOLLET 48 8,689 8,797 2 4 17 130 12 21 NOBLES 20 5,159 3,898 3 2 29 67 3 7 NORMAN 9 1,794 1,954 0 1 5 28 2 10 OLMSTED 91 37,371 33,285 14 2 52 492 67 129 OTTER TAIL 50 19,734 12,038 8 3 26 217 29 40 PENNINGTON 22 3,767 3,117 2 1 10 75 7 12 PINE 40 7,033 7,228 5 2 24 119 24 22 PIPESTONE 3 3,066 1,900 1 2 3 46 7 3 POLK 21 8,724 6,729 1 3 16 122 16 16 POPE 18 3,303 3,301 4 0 9 51 5 8 RAMSEY 420 97,096 171,846 47 50 306 1,764 239 540 RED LAKE 5 1,164 963 0 2 2 27 9 3 REDWOOD 11 4,898 3,104 1 0 11 71 37 1 RENVILLE 4 4,430 3,787 4 4 14 75 12 6 RICE 50 13,881 16,425 7 3 26 255 25 52 ROCK 7 3,111 2,000 3 3 13 35 7 9 ROSEAU 16 5,355 2,442 0 2 7 67 9 10 SAINT LOUIS 215 40,112 77,958 27 19 104 730 113 179 SCOTT 67 36,055 23,958 6 1 38 323 44 101 SHERBURNE 53 25,182 15,816 5 2 27 239 46 48 SIBLEY 16 4,669 3,109 5 2 19 96 18 14 STEARNS 164 41,726 32,659 30 22 76 640 101 95 STEELE 49 10,389 7,994 5 4 22 129 71 17 STEVENS 21 3,030 2,821 3 1 6 49 2 8 SWIFT 11 2,481 3,165 1 0 2 54 9 8 TODD 27 6,945 5,034 1 3 25 103 47 19 TRAVERSE 6 1,076 1,026 0 0 0 26 4 3 WABASHA 17 6,120 5,548 2 0 9 97 15 20 WADENA 9 4,214 2,791 1 0 6 52 6 9 WASECA 14 5,457 4,179 3 1 12 92 20 8 WASHINGTON 139 65,751 61,395 14 12 62 661 105 200 WATONWAN 18 2,970 2,514 1 0 9 61 6 1 WILKIN 7 2,303 1,169 3 0 3 26 5 10 WINONA 52 12,686 14,231 9 9 42 263 41 57 WRIGHT 66 36,176 22,618 14 14 33 352 100 103 YELLOW MEDICINE 10 2,878 2,799 0 1 3 44 13 2 TOTAL 4,408 1,346,695 1,445,014 539 416 2,387 18,683 3,074 4,639 308 Eight Votes Minnesota Chapter Minnesota Votes Chapter Eight PRESIDENTIAL ELECTORS Green Party electors pledged to David Cobb for president and Pat LaMarche for vice president: Scott Bol, Kellie Burriss, Michael Cavlan, Amber Garlan, Jenny Heiser, Molly Nutting, Douglas Root, Mark Wahl, Annie Young, Dean Zimmermann.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sample Ballot
    SAMPLE BALLOT SKAGIT COUNTY WA GENERAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 2, 2004 INSTRUCTIONS 1. Only use pencil to mark your ballot. PROPOSED TO THE LEGISLATURE STATE STATE 2. You must completely blacken the oval to AND REFERRED TO THE PEOPLE: INITIATIVE TO THE LEGISLATURE 297 the left of your desired selection. Initiative Measure No. 297 concerns GOVERNOR ATTORNEY GENERAL "mixed" radioactive and nonradioactive 4 Year Term 4 Year Term 3. To write-in a candidate you must write hazardous waste. This measure would Vote For One Vote For One their name and party on the line provided add new provisions concerning "mixed" under the desired position. radioactive and nonradioactive hazardous waste, requiring cleanup of contamination 4. Do not make any identifying marks on before additional waste is added, Christine Gregoire D Deborah Senn D your ballot. prioritizing cleanup, providing for public participation and enforcement through ABBREVIATION POLITICAL PARTY citizen lawsuits. Dino Rossi R Rob McKenna R D Democratic Should this measure be enacted into law? R Republican L Libertarian Ruth Bennett L J. Bradley Gibson L WW Workers World Yes G Green SW Socialist Workers Paul Richmond G C Constitution No SE Socialist Equality Write-in I Independent Candidate NP Nonpartisan Write-in PROPOSED BY INITIATIVE PETITION: FEDERAL LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR INITIATIVE TO THE PEOPLE 872 4 Year Term Initiative Measure No. 872 concerns Vote For One elections for partisan offices. This PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC LANDS measure would allow voters to select OF THE UNITED STATES 4 Year Term among all candidates in a primary. 4 Year Term Vote For One Ballots would indicate candidates' party Vote For One Brad Owen D preference.
    [Show full text]
  • Marxism, History and Socialist Consciousness: a Reply by David North to Alex Steiner and Frank Brenner
    Marxism, History and Socialist Consciousness: A Reply by David North to Alex Steiner and Frank Brenner Dear Comrades Steiner and Brenner: The International Committee of the Fourth International (ICFI) has asked that I reply to your document, “Objectivism or Marxism,” on its behalf. This is a task that I undertake with a certain degree of regret. Notwithstanding the different paths our lives have taken over the past three decades, I retain warm recollections of the time when we worked closely together within the movement. However, that was very long ago, and your latest document serves only to underscore what your various writings over the past several years have made increasingly apparent: that you have traveled very far politically from Marxism, the political heritage of the Trotskyist movement, and the ICFI. This inescapable political reality must determine the content and the tone of this reply. Your letter begins by protesting that the ICFI has failed to answer your previous documents, from which you draw the most disturbing conclusions: The ICFI suffers from “an aversion to criticism” that is “symptomatic of deeper problems within the movement that every member and supporter of the IC should be concerned about.” The leadership of the movement “stonewalls political debate,” and seeks “to quell discussion in order to insulate itself from criticism.” Our alleged failure to respond to your documents “only underscores how alien a practice genuinely critical debate has become within the movement.” To the uninformed observer, the situation you describe can only evoke images of a besieged opposition tendency in a dictatorial political party, battling against a bureaucratic regime’s suppression of its democratic right to be heard by the rank-and-file membership.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Elections 2004
    2004 ELECTION RESULTS The following four sections present the primary, runoff and general election results for the U.S. Presidential and U.S. Congressional elections held in 2004. The November 2004 general election (and Louisiana’s December 2004 runoff election) resulted in the election of the 109th Congress. The following is the party composition of the 109th Congress, as determined by the results of these elections: U.S. Senate Republicans: 55 Democrats: 44 Independents: 1 U.S. House of Representatives Republicans: 232 Democrats: 202 Independents: 1 Notes on Charts * Runoff election vote totals have been included with the primary election totals. (For the U.S. Senate, runoff elections were held in Georgia and South Carolina. For the U.S. House of Representatives, runoff elections were held in Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina and Texas.) For Louisiana, runoff election vote totals have been included with the general election totals. The following three situations account for blank spaces in the charts and should be considered when making comparisons or drawing conclusions about the vote totals. * In some states, i.e., Connecticut, Utah and Virginia, political parties may nominate general election candidates by party convention, rather than by primary election. * In some states, there were unopposed candidates whose names did not appear on a ballot and therefore received no votes. * 34 states had regularly scheduled U.S. Senate elections in 2004. 2004 PRESIDENTIAL POPULAR VOTE SUMMARY FOR ALL CANDIDATES LISTED ON AT LEAST ONE STATE BALLOT Candidate (Party Label) Popular Vote Total Percent of Popular Vote George W. Bush (Republican) 62,040,610 50.73% John F.
    [Show full text]
  • New York President Recap
    Statement and Return Report for Certification General Election 2008 - 11/04/2008 New York County - All Parties and Independent Bodies President/Vice President Citywide Vote for 1 Page 1 of 18 BOARD OF ELECTIONS Statement and Return Report for Certification IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK General Election 2008 - 11/04/2008 PRINTED AS OF: New York County 12/2/2008 9:06:21AM All Parties and Independent Bodies President/Vice President (Citywide), vote for 1 Assembly District 64 PUBLIC COUNTER 39,600 EMERGENCY 268 ABSENTEE/MILITARY 1,468 FEDERAL 640 SPECIAL PRESIDENTIAL 0 AFFIDAVIT 2,066 Total Ballots 44,042 BARACK OBAMA / JOE BIDEN (DEMOCRATIC) 33,099 JOHN MCCAIN / SARAH PALIN (REPUBLICAN) 8,245 JOHN MCCAIN / SARAH PALIN (INDEPENDENCE) 419 JOHN MCCAIN / SARAH PALIN (CONSERVATIVE) 172 BARACK OBAMA / JOE BIDEN (WORKING FAMILIES) 1,141 ROGER CALERO / ALYSON KENNEDY (SOCIALIST WORKERS) 26 GLORIA LA RIVA / EUGENE PURYEAR (SOCIALISM & LIBERATION) 9 CYNTHIA MCKINNEY / ROSA CLEMENTE (GREEN) 100 BOB BARR / WAYNE A ROOT (LIBERTARIAN) 116 RALPH NADER / MATT GONZALEZ (POPULIST) 162 CHUCK BALDWIN (OFFICIAL WRITE-IN) 1 ALAN KEYES/MIKE HUCKABEE (WRITE-IN) 1 CYNTHIA MCKINNEY (WRITE-IN) 1 HILLARY CLINTON (WRITE-IN) 5 HUCKABEE (WRITE-IN) 1 IVER FINDLAY/ JIM FINDLAY (WRITE-IN) 1 JOE BIDEN (WRITE-IN) 1 MITT ROMNEY (WRITE-IN) 2 NONE OF THE ABOVE (WRITE-IN) 1 RON PAUL (WRITE-IN) 4 RUDY GUILIANI (WRITE-IN) 1 TRUTH & BEAUTY (WRITE-IN) 1 Total Votes 43,509 Unrecorded 533 Page 2 of 18 BOARD OF ELECTIONS Statement and Return Report for Certification IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
    [Show full text]
  • Monarch- the New Phoenix Program- the New Phoenix Program II Tuesday, September 18, 2012 7:10
    Monarch- The New Phoenix Program- The New Phoenix Program II Tuesday, September 18, 2012 7:10 The Phoenix Program, assassinating suspected VC sympathizers in a systematic manner, worked well during the Vietnam War and is the blueprint for the current black op targeting thousands of loyal Americans using state of the art microwave (MW) and radio frequency radiation (RFR) weapons. The motivation to suppress domestic dissidents and to assassinate loyal American opposition stems from the perception of dissent against the war as treason. This philosophy is stated very clearly in the MindWar paper written by NSA General Aquino. The DOD has a huge stake in futuristic technology that kills by ionizing and non-ionizing radiation, leaving little or no trace. The indiscriminant killing of the Phoenix Program continues on American soil. The terms soft kill, slow kill and silent kill refer to the new way of killing the enemy in conflicts short of war and the small wars of the future. The counterinsurgency doctrine has now been applied to the home front, so that the perceived betrayal of the military in Vietnam will not be repeated. The generation of CIA and military intelligence led by Shackley, Helms, Casey, Abrams, Singlaub, Secord, John B. Alexander, Michael Aquino, Paul Vallely, and others have built the perfect beast, using selective assassination that leaves no trace. The ability to cull the human herd with Silent Kill technology allows a few personalities to remake the entire society in their own image. (Excerpt from monarchnewphoenix.com) http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2012/09/monarch-the-new-phoenix-program- 2468326.html The New Phoenix Program II (1hr20min) full http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LilZFK2myQs The New Phoenix Program II (1hr20min) 1:19:59 - 1 year ago Film about microwave weapons war crimes and crimes against humanity.
    [Show full text]
  • On the WSWS's “Curious Fumble” on Iraq and Other Matters
    An exchange with an apologist for the SEP leadership: On the WSWS’s “curious fumble” on Iraq and other matters I’m posting here some comments by a reader, mdv, and my response. Judging from mdv’s remarks, it is fair to characterize him as an apologist for the SEP leadership. But what is interesting is that unlike David North (or the Talbots), mdv tries to address some of the substantive criticisms we made of the SEP’s political line and practice. His efforts to defend the SEP leadership on these issues lead him to make, albeit inadvertently, some revealing statements which deserve to be brought to the attention of our readers. Another reason for responding to mdv is that the views he expresses are probably shared by others in and around the SEP. These comments by mdv are the latest installment of an exchange he was having with Andrew River over a blog River wrote for permanent-revolution.org concerning a speech by North to a Slavic studies conference.1 As far as this exchange goes, I have nothing to add to what River has said, and mdv’s latest remarks raise nothing new on this score. From the second paragraph on, however, mdv moves to a more broad-based defense of the SEP leadership, and it is these remarks that concern me here. Frank Brenner * * * * * Mdv’s comments: I think you're grasping at straws to come up with an indictment of North that fits the narrative that Steiner, Brenner and yourself have already constructed. You, once again, harp on the grand ideological conclusions you deduce from what is frankly a less-than-questionable phrasing in North's comments (which you morph into a "schema" at odds with the ABCs of Marxism), lecturing me on how "History" doesn't automatically solve the problems of revolution, socialism and so on.
    [Show full text]
  • Methodology Report and User's Guide for the 2008-2009 ANES Panel Study
    Methodology Report and User’s Guide for the 2008–2009 ANES Panel Study August 2010 (Revised September 22, 2010) (Revised December 13, 2010) Matthew DeBell Jon A. Krosnick Arthur Lupia American National Election Studies Stanford University and the University of Michigan This document may be freely copied or redistributed, provided it is not altered. Suggested Citation Matthew DeBell, Jon A. Krosnick, and Arthur Lupia. 2010. Methodology Report and User’s Guide for the 2008–2009 ANES Panel Study. Palo Alto, CA, and Ann Arbor, MI: Stanford University and the University of Michigan. Acknowledgments This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Nos. SES- 0535332 and SES-0535334. ANES is also supported by Stanford University and the University of Michigan. Sections of this report may reprint previous documentation of the American National Election Studies without explicit attribution. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation, Stanford University, or the University of Michigan. The ANES Principal Investigators for the Panel Study were Jon A. Krosnick at Stanford University and Arthur Lupia at the University of Michigan. Vincent Hutchings at the University of Michigan was Associate Principal Investigator. The Panel Study director was Matthew DeBell. ANES staff on the study were Caroline Roberts, Jaime Ventura, and Jonathan Cowden, with additional support from Darrell Donakowski, Catherine Wilson, Pat Luevano, Heather Branton, Laurie Pierson, and David Howell. Research assistance at Stanford was provided by Wendy Gross, Farah Giga, Gaurav Sood, Lucila Figueroa, Mackenzie Israel-Trummel, Yo-Yo Chen, Helen Chen, Troy Wu, Jade Wang, Logan Ensign, Peter Tu, Abiy Teshome, and Mario Suntanu, with some additional ad hoc support from Autumn Carter, Mai El-Sadany, Lucinda Gibbs, Natasha Kim, Andy Nguyen, Deborah Oh, Noelle Spring, and Elaine Albertson.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Lazenby Scottish Identity – What Is That? | Lesley Riddoch the Man Who Sank Argentina
    STILL DEFIANT AFTER 30 YEARS | PETER LAZENBY SCOttish identity – whaT IS THAT? | LESLEY RIDDOCH THE MAN WHO SANK ARGENTINA | GREG PALAST ColdType WRITING WORTH READING ISSUE 88 SPECIAL ISSUE MURDERTHE OF GAZA NINE ESSAYS BY DAVID EDWARDS AND DAVID CROMWELL l PHILIP GIRALDI l RAMZY BAROUD l LINDA McQUAIG l JONATHAN COOK JOHN REINER l CHRIS HEDGES l RICHARD PITHOUSE l DEEPA KUMAR STILL DEFIANT AFTER 30 YEARS | PETER LAZENBY SCOTTISH IDENTITY – WHAT IS THAT? | LESLEY RIDDOCH Cover: Israeli tank fires a shell into THE MAN WHO SANK ARGENTINA | GREG PALAST Gaza in a propaganda photograph ColdType from the Israel Defence Forces WRITING WORTH READING ISSUE 88 SPECIAL ISSUE MTHE U R D E R O F GAZA NINE ESSAYS BY ● DAVID EDWARDS AND DAVID CROMWELL ● PHILIP GIRALDI ● RAMZY BAROUD ● LINDA McQUAIG ● JONATHAN COOK JOHN REINER ● CHRIS HEDGES ● RICHARD PITHOUSE ● DEEPA KUMAR ColdType ISSUE 88 / AUGUST 2014 3. BOOK EXCERPT / THE VULTURE: CHEWING ARGENTINA’s living corpse GREG PALAST 6. PREDATORS IN THE FIELD STACEY WARDE 11. THE ABSURD HELL THAT IS AMERICA’s police stATE JOHN W. WHITEHEAD 15. WORSE THAN ORWELL’s wORST NIGHTMARE JOHN PILGER 20. SUPERBUGS THREATEN TO RETURN US TO THE DARK AGES TREVOR GRUNDY 24. STILL DEFIANT AFTER 30 YEARS PETER LAZENY & JOAN HEATH 32. BOOK EXCERPT / SCOTTISH IDENTITY: WHAT IS IT? LESLEY RIDDOCH COVER STORIES / THE MURDER OF GAZA 42. ‘disgustinglY Biased’ DAVID EDWARDS & DAVID CROMWELL 47. ISRAEL, RIGHT OR WRONG PHILIP GIRALDI 51. IT IS NOT JUST AN ISRAELI WAR ON GAZA RAMZY BAROUD 54. WHOW STEPHEN HARPER BETRAYED CANADA LINDA McQUAIG 58.
    [Show full text]
  • America's Deadliest Export
    ABOUT THIS BOOK For over sixty-five years, the United States war machine has been on automatic pilot. Since World War II we have been conditioned to believe that America’s motives in ‘exporting’ democracy are honorable, even noble. In this startling and provocative book, William Blum, a leading dissident chronicler of US foreign policy and the author of controversial bestseller Rogue State, argues that nothing could be further from the truth. Moreover, unless this fallacy is unlearned, and until people understand fully the worldwide suffering American policy has caused, we will never be able to stop the monster. ABOUT THE AUTHOR William Blum is one of the United States’ leading non-mainstream experts on American foreign policy. He left the State Department in 1967, abandoning his aspiration of becoming a Foreign Service Officer because of his opposition to what the US was doing in Vietnam. He then became a founder and editor of the Washington Free Press, the first ‘alternative’ newspaper in the capital. Blum has been a freelance journalist in the US, Europe, and South America. His stay in Chile in 1972–73, writing about the Allende government’s ‘socialist experiment,’ and then its tragic overthrow in a CIA-designed coup, instilled in him a personal involvement and an even more heightened interest in what his government was doing in various corners of the world. His book Killing Hope: US Military and CIA Interventions Since World War II has received international acclaim. Noam Chomsky called it ‘Far and away the best book on the topic.’ In 1999 he was one of the recipients of Project Censored’s awards for ‘exemplary journalism.’ Blum is also the author of Rogue State: A Guide to the World’s Only Superpower, West-Bloc Dissident: A Cold War Memoir, and Freeing the World to Death: Essays on the American Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008-2009 ANES Panel Study Questionnaires American National Election Studies August 2010
    2008-2009 ANES Panel Study Questionnaires American National Election Studies August 2010 This document contains the questionnaire programming specifications for the ANES- sponsored questionnaires from the 2008-2009 ANES Panel Study: January, February, June, September, October, and November 2008 and January, May, July, and August 2009 are included. Some questions from January and August 2009 were not sponsored by ANES and these non-ANES questions are shaded in gray to distinguish them from ANES-sponsored content. These questionnaires were administered entirely over the Internet. The document also contains the specifications for the recruitment questionnaire (administered primarily over the telephone, but which also existed in an Internet version) and the Internet profile survey. Questionnaires from other waves of the survey (in March, April, May, July, August, and December 2008 and February, March, April, June, and September 2009) were not sponsored by ANES. Those questionnaires are part of the supplemental data package for the study. Contents of this Document 1. How to Read the Questionnaires..................................................................................... 1 2. Wave 1 (January) questionnaire...................................................................................... 5 3. Wave 2 (February) questionnaire.................................................................................. 61 4. Wave 6 (June) questionnaire....................................................................................... 122
    [Show full text]
  • United States Detention Policy in Counterterrorism and Counterinsurgency Operations: 2001 to 2011
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ United States Detention Policy in Counterterrorism and Counterinsurgency Operations: 2001 to 2011 Qureshi, Ahmed Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 25. Sep. 2021 This electronic theses or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ Title: United States Detention Policy in Counterterrorism and Counterinsurgency Operations: 2001 to 2011 Author: Ahmed Qureshi The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement.
    [Show full text]
  • Steuben County 2004 General Election Results
    Steuben County General Election 11/22/2004 84 districts out of 84 reported ******* OFFICIAL RESULTS ******* County Wide PRESIDENTIAL ELECTORS FOR PRESIDENT AND VICE-PRESIDENT (Vote ONCE) 1A George W. Bush / Dick Cheney - REP 26066 1B John F. Kerry / John Edwards - DEM 14090 1C Ralph Nader / Jan D. Pierce - IND 600 1D George W. Bush / Dick Cheney - CON 914 1E John F. Kerry / John Edwards - WOR 433 1F Ralph Nader / Peter Miguel Camejo - PJP 93 1G Roger Calero / Arrin Hawkins - SWP 11 1H Michael Badnarik / Richard V. Campagna - LBT 66 W1 David Cobb - Write-In 5 W10 Hillary Clinton - Write-In 1 W11 Bradley Davis - Write-In 1 W12 Elizabeth J. Hyler - Write-In 1 W2 Michael Halpin - Write-In 0 W3 John Joseph Kennedy - Write-In 0 W4 Michael A. Peroutka - Write-In 6 W5 Bill Van Auken - Write-In 0 W6 John Mc Cain - Write-In 6 W7 Rudy Giuliani - Write-In 1 W8 Colin Powell - Write-In 2 W9 Dennis Kucinich - Write-In 2 YY Blank - 352 ZZ Void - 36 County Wide UNITED STATES SENATOR (Vote for ONE) 2A Howard Mills - REP 16379 2B Charles E. Schumer - DEM 16224 2C Charles E. Schumer - IND 1328 2D Marilyn F. O'Grady - CON 1282 2E Charles E. Schumer - WOR 615 2F Abraham Hirschfeld - BLD 112 2G Martin Koppel - SWP 66 2H Donald Silberger - LBT 109 2I David E. McReynolds - GRE 201 John Mc Cain - Write-In 1 Hillary Clinton - Write-In 1 Ashley L. Easton - Write-In 1 Samuel B. Turner - Write-In 1 Blank - 6330 Void - 36 County Wide JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT (7th District) (Vote for ANY TWO) 3A Thomas A.
    [Show full text]