DOCSLIB.ORG

Monarch- the New Phoenix Program- the New Phoenix Program II Tuesday, September 18, 2012 7:10

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Monarch- The New Phoenix Program- The New Phoenix Program II Tuesday, September 18, 2012 7:10 The Phoenix Program, assassinating suspected VC sympathizers in a systematic manner, worked well during the Vietnam War and is the blueprint for the current black op targeting thousands of loyal Americans using state of the art microwave (MW) and radio frequency radiation (RFR) weapons. The motivation to suppress domestic dissidents and to assassinate loyal American opposition stems from the perception of dissent against the war as treason. This philosophy is stated very clearly in the MindWar paper written by NSA General Aquino. The DOD has a huge stake in futuristic technology that kills by ionizing and non-ionizing radiation, leaving little or no trace. The indiscriminant killing of the Phoenix Program continues on American soil. The terms soft kill, slow kill and silent kill refer to the new way of killing the enemy in conflicts short of war and the small wars of the future. The counterinsurgency doctrine has now been applied to the home front, so that the perceived betrayal of the military in Vietnam will not be repeated. The generation of CIA and military intelligence led by Shackley, Helms, Casey, Abrams, Singlaub, Secord, John B. Alexander, Michael Aquino, Paul Vallely, and others have built the perfect beast, using selective assassination that leaves no trace. The ability to cull the human herd with Silent Kill technology allows a few personalities to remake the entire society in their own image. (Excerpt from monarchnewphoenix.com) http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2012/09/monarch-the-new-phoenix-program- 2468326.html The New Phoenix Program II (1hr20min) full http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LilZFK2myQs The New Phoenix Program II (1hr20min) 1:19:59 - 1 year ago Film about microwave weapons war crimes and crimes against humanity. The victims tell their story of being tortured mercilessly with state of the art anti-personnel weapons. Related Stories • Stretchable Mark 666 Technology Micro chips!!! • MTEA President Bob Peterson in Chicago • Man Dies of Unknown Causes During Search Warrant Execution • This 24 Second Video Speaks For Itself • Michael C. Goodchild; Creating Victims Where There Are None • Deputy Police Chief Melix Bonilla and Former Lantigua Chief of Staff Lenny Degnan Indicted • Elderly Woman Dragged From Car by Texas Cop • Russias Massive Diamond Discovery • Scientists Warn Diets High in Fructose May Harm Liver in Some • Planet Pulp Ushers Into the USA- Six Refreshing Flavors For Any Occasion Welcome to Monarch Concepts Inc. Thank you for visiting. We invite you to browse through our store and shop with confidence. The works are free to all people. If you wish to buy a hardcopy here to support victims of torture, then please accept my profound gratitude on their behalf. Monarch Concepts nonprofit 501 C 3 raises funds for victims of torture and abuse, this includes victims of nonlethal weapons assaults & organized stalking. Three websites are for sales of films, books, merchandise dedicated to them alone. http://monarchtorture.org http://MONARCHtorture.com http://microwavemurder.org The SUPER PAC (political action committee) MARSHALL PLAN PAC raises funds for the FOUR GOALS, political reforms & a new Marshall Plan (blogs). There are two dedicated websites for sales of films, books, and merchandise. http://marshallPlanPAC.org One website dedicated to fund the author through sales of his own films and books. MONARCHnewPHOENIX.com ALL sales at other websites, unless otherwise stated, go to the author. It is not uncommon for nonprofit organizations to be taken away from their founders (GRAMEEN BANK/Professor Muhammad Yunus). The author pledges that all funds go to fight for the victims of torture and abuse, and to reform our institutions so this never happens again. Diversification allows the mission to succeed, even if 1-2 pathways are blocked or destroyed. Marshall Gregory Thomas The films, books, & songs are free on these websites: Please see these websites to purchase a hard copy of the films, books, songs, & merchandise: http://microwaveweapon.net http://monarchnewphoenix.com http://monarchtorture.com http://monarchtorture.org http://microwavemurder.org http://inscomcrimes.com http://monarchconcepts.org These websites have the free films, books, songs, & merchandise http://microwaveweapon.org http://marshallthomas.org http://marshallgregorythomas.com http://marshallgthomas.com http://inscomcrimes.org http://sites.google.com/site/microwaveweapon The works are free to all people. These websites have the free films, books, & songs http://microwaveweapon.org http://marshallthomas.org http://marshallgregorythomas.com http://marshallgthomas.com http://inscomcrimes.org http://sites.google.com/site/microwavefilms http://sites.google.com/site/microwavevideo http://sites.google.com/site/microwaveweapon Microwave weapons to neutralize and kill political activists and whistleblowers, U.S. Citizens,The New Phoenix Program Thursday, August 26, 2010 17:01 The film about war crimes using microwave weapons to neutralize and kill political activists and whistleblowers. The author has interviewed 200 targets who have been turned into human guinea pigs to perfect electromagnetic weapons and the science of behavior modification. 2hrs and 15 minutes Obama targeted individual assassination Phoenix Program includes Americans. Obama has now authorized what Bush began, assassinating targeted individuals including Americans on US soil, confirming that the new global Phoenix Program recommended by General Patraeus in 2009 is now officially operational. It has been tested and used on an untold and growing number of innocent citizens since 2001's mass murder. In Monarch no-touch torture of US targets press conference slated, the writer highlighted Tom Hayden's revelation that "General David Petraeus, Commander, U.S. Central Command advocated the "global Phoenix Program," alluding to the notorious Vietnam-era CIA data-base operation used to torture and assassinate innocent civilians due to their political beliefs. (Tom Hayden, Reviving Vietnam War Tactics, The Nation, 2008) Global includes the U.S." In "Shocking state secrets: Patriot ACT illegal spy domestic terror campaign, the author detailed how the new Phoenix Program secretly escalated since 9-11-2001 and is not a new Obama administration crime: "Revelations that the Central Intelligence Agency launched a world-wide assassination program, and then concealed its existence from the U.S. Congress and the American people for eight years, carries an implication that death squads may have been employed against political opponents." (Tom Burghardt, Antifascist Calling, Dick Cheney's 'Executive Assassination Ring', Global Research, July 17, 2009)more here>www.examiner.com/human-rights-in- national/obama-targeted-individual-assassination-phoenix-program-includes-americans Monarch: The New Phoenix Program II Introduction: The New Phoenix Program I Human Radiation Experiments II MKULTRA III MONARCH IV Cults and Cover Up V Cointelpro and Phoenix Program VI Aquino and Alexanders’ New Phoenix Program VII Mind War VIII The Targeted Individuals IX The Law X The Pleas (30 letters) XI Science of the Virtual Gulag XII Bibliography PDF File link here>www.truesoundhealing.com/Marshall %20Thomas%20-%20Monarch%20II%20-%20Victims.pdf Related Stories • Umnuayporn Tongprapai, 603-Pound Thai Woman, Leaves Home For First Time In 3 Years (PHOTOS) • Local News Shows UFOs Filmed In Texas Sky • BP Gulf Oil Spill’s Walking Dead • America’s Mental Illness Epidemic: It Turns Out That the Drugs are the Problem • The New Phoenix Program • The New Phoenix Program – Silent Kill? • Lindsay Lohan Poisoned! • Oldest evidence of arrows found • Bush-Cheney campaign pressured papers to keep campaign managers sexuality secret • WikiLeaks releases CIA analysis, no bombshell revelations WEDNESDAY, APR 7, 2010 04:08 AM MST Confirmed: Obama authorizes assassination of U.S. citizen N.Y. Times, Washington Post both report that the president has taken a step beyond where even George Bush would go BY GLENN GREENWALD Anwar al-Awlaki (updated below – Update II – Update III – Update IV) In late January, I wrote about the Obama administration’s “presidential assassination program,” whereby American citizens are targeted for killings far away from any battlefield, based exclusively on unchecked accusations by the Executive Branch that they’re involved in Terrorism. At the time, The Washington Post‘s Dana Priest had noted deep in a long article that Obama had continued Bush’s policy (which Bush never actually implemented) of having the Joint Chiefs of Staff compile “hit lists” of Americans, and Priest suggested that the American-born Islamic cleric Anwar al- Awlaki was on that list. The following week, Obama’s Director of National Intelligence, Adm. Dennis Blair, acknowledged in Congressional testimony that the administration reserves the “right” to carry out such assassinations. Today, both The New York Times and The Washington Post confirm that the Obama White House has now expressly authorized the CIA to kill al-Alwaki no matter where he is found, no matter his distance from a battlefield. I wrote at length about the extreme dangers and lawlessness of allowing the Executive Branch the power to murder U.S. citizens far away from a battlefield (i.e., while they’re sleeping, at home, with their children, etc.) and with no due process of any kind. I won’t repeat those arguments — they’re here and here — but I do want to highlight how unbelievably
Recommended publications
  • Sample Ballot

    Sample Ballot

    SAMPLE BALLOT SKAGIT COUNTY WA GENERAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 2, 2004 INSTRUCTIONS 1. Only use pencil to mark your ballot. PROPOSED TO THE LEGISLATURE STATE STATE 2. You must completely blacken the oval to AND REFERRED TO THE PEOPLE: INITIATIVE TO THE LEGISLATURE 297 the left of your desired selection. Initiative Measure No. 297 concerns GOVERNOR ATTORNEY GENERAL "mixed" radioactive and nonradioactive 4 Year Term 4 Year Term 3. To write-in a candidate you must write hazardous waste. This measure would Vote For One Vote For One their name and party on the line provided add new provisions concerning "mixed" under the desired position. radioactive and nonradioactive hazardous waste, requiring cleanup of contamination 4. Do not make any identifying marks on before additional waste is added, Christine Gregoire D Deborah Senn D your ballot. prioritizing cleanup, providing for public participation and enforcement through ABBREVIATION POLITICAL PARTY citizen lawsuits. Dino Rossi R Rob McKenna R D Democratic Should this measure be enacted into law? R Republican L Libertarian Ruth Bennett L J. Bradley Gibson L WW Workers World Yes G Green SW Socialist Workers Paul Richmond G C Constitution No SE Socialist Equality Write-in I Independent Candidate NP Nonpartisan Write-in PROPOSED BY INITIATIVE PETITION: FEDERAL LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR INITIATIVE TO THE PEOPLE 872 4 Year Term Initiative Measure No. 872 concerns Vote For One elections for partisan offices. This PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC LANDS measure would allow voters to select OF THE UNITED STATES 4 Year Term among all candidates in a primary. 4 Year Term Vote For One Ballots would indicate candidates' party Vote For One Brad Owen D preference.
  • Marxism, History and Socialist Consciousness: a Reply by David North to Alex Steiner and Frank Brenner

    Marxism, History and Socialist Consciousness: a Reply by David North to Alex Steiner and Frank Brenner

    Marxism, History and Socialist Consciousness: A Reply by David North to Alex Steiner and Frank Brenner Dear Comrades Steiner and Brenner: The International Committee of the Fourth International (ICFI) has asked that I reply to your document, “Objectivism or Marxism,” on its behalf. This is a task that I undertake with a certain degree of regret. Notwithstanding the different paths our lives have taken over the past three decades, I retain warm recollections of the time when we worked closely together within the movement. However, that was very long ago, and your latest document serves only to underscore what your various writings over the past several years have made increasingly apparent: that you have traveled very far politically from Marxism, the political heritage of the Trotskyist movement, and the ICFI. This inescapable political reality must determine the content and the tone of this reply. Your letter begins by protesting that the ICFI has failed to answer your previous documents, from which you draw the most disturbing conclusions: The ICFI suffers from “an aversion to criticism” that is “symptomatic of deeper problems within the movement that every member and supporter of the IC should be concerned about.” The leadership of the movement “stonewalls political debate,” and seeks “to quell discussion in order to insulate itself from criticism.” Our alleged failure to respond to your documents “only underscores how alien a practice genuinely critical debate has become within the movement.” To the uninformed observer, the situation you describe can only evoke images of a besieged opposition tendency in a dictatorial political party, battling against a bureaucratic regime’s suppression of its democratic right to be heard by the rank-and-file membership.
  • Source: Minnesota Legislative Manual 2005/2006 Chapter Minnesota Votes Chapter Eight

    Source: Minnesota Legislative Manual 2005/2006 Chapter Minnesota Votes Chapter Eight

    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/mngov/electionresults.aspx Chapter Eight Minnesota Votes WINNING PARTY FOR PRESIDENT BY PRECINCT NOVEMBER 2, 2004 GENERAL ELECTION Metro area 290 Eight Votes Minnesota Source: Minnesota Legislative Manual 2005/2006 Chapter Minnesota Votes Chapter Eight WINNING PARTY FOR U.S. REPRESENTATIVE BY PRECINCT NOVEMBER 2, 2004 GENERAL ELECTION Metro area 291 Eight Votes Minnesota Chapter Chapter Eight Minnesota Votes STATE SENATE DISTRICTS BY PARTY, JANUARY 3, 2005 292 Eight Votes Minnesota Chapter Minnesota Votes Chapter Eight STATE SENATE DISTRICTS BY PARTY, JANUARY 3, 2005 Metro area 293 Eight Votes Minnesota Chapter Chapter Eight Minnesota Votes STATE HOUSE DISTRICTS BY PARTY, JANUARY 3, 2005 294 Eight Votes Minnesota Chapter Minnesota Votes Chapter Eight STATE HOUSE DISTRICTS BY PARTY, JANUARY 3, 2005 Metro area 295 Eight Votes Minnesota Chapter Chapter Eight Minnesota Votes VOTING SYSTEMS USED BY PRECINCT NOVEMBER 2, 2004 GENERAL ELECTION Hand Counted: Ballots are counted by hand after the polls close (roughly 17% of polling places, containing 4% of voters) Centrally Counted Optical Scan: Ballots are scanned and tabulated at a central location in the county after the polls close (roughly 37% of precincts, containing 16% of voters) Precinct-Based Optical Scan: Voters put their ballots into a scanner in the polling place (roughly 46% of polling places, containing 80% of
  • Federal Elections 2004

    Federal Elections 2004

    2004 ELECTION RESULTS The following four sections present the primary, runoff and general election results for the U.S. Presidential and U.S. Congressional elections held in 2004. The November 2004 general election (and Louisiana’s December 2004 runoff election) resulted in the election of the 109th Congress. The following is the party composition of the 109th Congress, as determined by the results of these elections: U.S. Senate Republicans: 55 Democrats: 44 Independents: 1 U.S. House of Representatives Republicans: 232 Democrats: 202 Independents: 1 Notes on Charts * Runoff election vote totals have been included with the primary election totals. (For the U.S. Senate, runoff elections were held in Georgia and South Carolina. For the U.S. House of Representatives, runoff elections were held in Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina and Texas.) For Louisiana, runoff election vote totals have been included with the general election totals. The following three situations account for blank spaces in the charts and should be considered when making comparisons or drawing conclusions about the vote totals. * In some states, i.e., Connecticut, Utah and Virginia, political parties may nominate general election candidates by party convention, rather than by primary election. * In some states, there were unopposed candidates whose names did not appear on a ballot and therefore received no votes. * 34 states had regularly scheduled U.S. Senate elections in 2004. 2004 PRESIDENTIAL POPULAR VOTE SUMMARY FOR ALL CANDIDATES LISTED ON AT LEAST ONE STATE BALLOT Candidate (Party Label) Popular Vote Total Percent of Popular Vote George W. Bush (Republican) 62,040,610 50.73% John F.
  • New York President Recap

    New York President Recap

    Statement and Return Report for Certification General Election 2008 - 11/04/2008 New York County - All Parties and Independent Bodies President/Vice President Citywide Vote for 1 Page 1 of 18 BOARD OF ELECTIONS Statement and Return Report for Certification IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK General Election 2008 - 11/04/2008 PRINTED AS OF: New York County 12/2/2008 9:06:21AM All Parties and Independent Bodies President/Vice President (Citywide), vote for 1 Assembly District 64 PUBLIC COUNTER 39,600 EMERGENCY 268 ABSENTEE/MILITARY 1,468 FEDERAL 640 SPECIAL PRESIDENTIAL 0 AFFIDAVIT 2,066 Total Ballots 44,042 BARACK OBAMA / JOE BIDEN (DEMOCRATIC) 33,099 JOHN MCCAIN / SARAH PALIN (REPUBLICAN) 8,245 JOHN MCCAIN / SARAH PALIN (INDEPENDENCE) 419 JOHN MCCAIN / SARAH PALIN (CONSERVATIVE) 172 BARACK OBAMA / JOE BIDEN (WORKING FAMILIES) 1,141 ROGER CALERO / ALYSON KENNEDY (SOCIALIST WORKERS) 26 GLORIA LA RIVA / EUGENE PURYEAR (SOCIALISM & LIBERATION) 9 CYNTHIA MCKINNEY / ROSA CLEMENTE (GREEN) 100 BOB BARR / WAYNE A ROOT (LIBERTARIAN) 116 RALPH NADER / MATT GONZALEZ (POPULIST) 162 CHUCK BALDWIN (OFFICIAL WRITE-IN) 1 ALAN KEYES/MIKE HUCKABEE (WRITE-IN) 1 CYNTHIA MCKINNEY (WRITE-IN) 1 HILLARY CLINTON (WRITE-IN) 5 HUCKABEE (WRITE-IN) 1 IVER FINDLAY/ JIM FINDLAY (WRITE-IN) 1 JOE BIDEN (WRITE-IN) 1 MITT ROMNEY (WRITE-IN) 2 NONE OF THE ABOVE (WRITE-IN) 1 RON PAUL (WRITE-IN) 4 RUDY GUILIANI (WRITE-IN) 1 TRUTH & BEAUTY (WRITE-IN) 1 Total Votes 43,509 Unrecorded 533 Page 2 of 18 BOARD OF ELECTIONS Statement and Return Report for Certification IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
  • On the WSWS's “Curious Fumble” on Iraq and Other Matters

    On the WSWS's “Curious Fumble” on Iraq and Other Matters

    An exchange with an apologist for the SEP leadership: On the WSWS’s “curious fumble” on Iraq and other matters I’m posting here some comments by a reader, mdv, and my response. Judging from mdv’s remarks, it is fair to characterize him as an apologist for the SEP leadership. But what is interesting is that unlike David North (or the Talbots), mdv tries to address some of the substantive criticisms we made of the SEP’s political line and practice. His efforts to defend the SEP leadership on these issues lead him to make, albeit inadvertently, some revealing statements which deserve to be brought to the attention of our readers. Another reason for responding to mdv is that the views he expresses are probably shared by others in and around the SEP. These comments by mdv are the latest installment of an exchange he was having with Andrew River over a blog River wrote for permanent-revolution.org concerning a speech by North to a Slavic studies conference.1 As far as this exchange goes, I have nothing to add to what River has said, and mdv’s latest remarks raise nothing new on this score. From the second paragraph on, however, mdv moves to a more broad-based defense of the SEP leadership, and it is these remarks that concern me here. Frank Brenner * * * * * Mdv’s comments: I think you're grasping at straws to come up with an indictment of North that fits the narrative that Steiner, Brenner and yourself have already constructed. You, once again, harp on the grand ideological conclusions you deduce from what is frankly a less-than-questionable phrasing in North's comments (which you morph into a "schema" at odds with the ABCs of Marxism), lecturing me on how "History" doesn't automatically solve the problems of revolution, socialism and so on.
  • Methodology Report and User's Guide for the 2008-2009 ANES Panel Study

    Methodology Report and User's Guide for the 2008-2009 ANES Panel Study

    Methodology Report and User’s Guide for the 2008–2009 ANES Panel Study August 2010 (Revised September 22, 2010) (Revised December 13, 2010) Matthew DeBell Jon A. Krosnick Arthur Lupia American National Election Studies Stanford University and the University of Michigan This document may be freely copied or redistributed, provided it is not altered. Suggested Citation Matthew DeBell, Jon A. Krosnick, and Arthur Lupia. 2010. Methodology Report and User’s Guide for the 2008–2009 ANES Panel Study. Palo Alto, CA, and Ann Arbor, MI: Stanford University and the University of Michigan. Acknowledgments This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Nos. SES- 0535332 and SES-0535334. ANES is also supported by Stanford University and the University of Michigan. Sections of this report may reprint previous documentation of the American National Election Studies without explicit attribution. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation, Stanford University, or the University of Michigan. The ANES Principal Investigators for the Panel Study were Jon A. Krosnick at Stanford University and Arthur Lupia at the University of Michigan. Vincent Hutchings at the University of Michigan was Associate Principal Investigator. The Panel Study director was Matthew DeBell. ANES staff on the study were Caroline Roberts, Jaime Ventura, and Jonathan Cowden, with additional support from Darrell Donakowski, Catherine Wilson, Pat Luevano, Heather Branton, Laurie Pierson, and David Howell. Research assistance at Stanford was provided by Wendy Gross, Farah Giga, Gaurav Sood, Lucila Figueroa, Mackenzie Israel-Trummel, Yo-Yo Chen, Helen Chen, Troy Wu, Jade Wang, Logan Ensign, Peter Tu, Abiy Teshome, and Mario Suntanu, with some additional ad hoc support from Autumn Carter, Mai El-Sadany, Lucinda Gibbs, Natasha Kim, Andy Nguyen, Deborah Oh, Noelle Spring, and Elaine Albertson.
  • Peter Lazenby Scottish Identity – What Is That? | Lesley Riddoch the Man Who Sank Argentina

    Peter Lazenby Scottish Identity – What Is That? | Lesley Riddoch the Man Who Sank Argentina

    STILL DEFIANT AFTER 30 YEARS | PETER LAZENBY SCOttish identity – whaT IS THAT? | LESLEY RIDDOCH THE MAN WHO SANK ARGENTINA | GREG PALAST ColdType WRITING WORTH READING ISSUE 88 SPECIAL ISSUE MURDERTHE OF GAZA NINE ESSAYS BY DAVID EDWARDS AND DAVID CROMWELL l PHILIP GIRALDI l RAMZY BAROUD l LINDA McQUAIG l JONATHAN COOK JOHN REINER l CHRIS HEDGES l RICHARD PITHOUSE l DEEPA KUMAR STILL DEFIANT AFTER 30 YEARS | PETER LAZENBY SCOTTISH IDENTITY – WHAT IS THAT? | LESLEY RIDDOCH Cover: Israeli tank fires a shell into THE MAN WHO SANK ARGENTINA | GREG PALAST Gaza in a propaganda photograph ColdType from the Israel Defence Forces WRITING WORTH READING ISSUE 88 SPECIAL ISSUE MTHE U R D E R O F GAZA NINE ESSAYS BY ● DAVID EDWARDS AND DAVID CROMWELL ● PHILIP GIRALDI ● RAMZY BAROUD ● LINDA McQUAIG ● JONATHAN COOK JOHN REINER ● CHRIS HEDGES ● RICHARD PITHOUSE ● DEEPA KUMAR ColdType ISSUE 88 / AUGUST 2014 3. BOOK EXCERPT / THE VULTURE: CHEWING ARGENTINA’s living corpse GREG PALAST 6. PREDATORS IN THE FIELD STACEY WARDE 11. THE ABSURD HELL THAT IS AMERICA’s police stATE JOHN W. WHITEHEAD 15. WORSE THAN ORWELL’s wORST NIGHTMARE JOHN PILGER 20. SUPERBUGS THREATEN TO RETURN US TO THE DARK AGES TREVOR GRUNDY 24. STILL DEFIANT AFTER 30 YEARS PETER LAZENY & JOAN HEATH 32. BOOK EXCERPT / SCOTTISH IDENTITY: WHAT IS IT? LESLEY RIDDOCH COVER STORIES / THE MURDER OF GAZA 42. ‘disgustinglY Biased’ DAVID EDWARDS & DAVID CROMWELL 47. ISRAEL, RIGHT OR WRONG PHILIP GIRALDI 51. IT IS NOT JUST AN ISRAELI WAR ON GAZA RAMZY BAROUD 54. WHOW STEPHEN HARPER BETRAYED CANADA LINDA McQUAIG 58.
  • America's Deadliest Export

    America's Deadliest Export

    ABOUT THIS BOOK For over sixty-five years, the United States war machine has been on automatic pilot. Since World War II we have been conditioned to believe that America’s motives in ‘exporting’ democracy are honorable, even noble. In this startling and provocative book, William Blum, a leading dissident chronicler of US foreign policy and the author of controversial bestseller Rogue State, argues that nothing could be further from the truth. Moreover, unless this fallacy is unlearned, and until people understand fully the worldwide suffering American policy has caused, we will never be able to stop the monster. ABOUT THE AUTHOR William Blum is one of the United States’ leading non-mainstream experts on American foreign policy. He left the State Department in 1967, abandoning his aspiration of becoming a Foreign Service Officer because of his opposition to what the US was doing in Vietnam. He then became a founder and editor of the Washington Free Press, the first ‘alternative’ newspaper in the capital. Blum has been a freelance journalist in the US, Europe, and South America. His stay in Chile in 1972–73, writing about the Allende government’s ‘socialist experiment,’ and then its tragic overthrow in a CIA-designed coup, instilled in him a personal involvement and an even more heightened interest in what his government was doing in various corners of the world. His book Killing Hope: US Military and CIA Interventions Since World War II has received international acclaim. Noam Chomsky called it ‘Far and away the best book on the topic.’ In 1999 he was one of the recipients of Project Censored’s awards for ‘exemplary journalism.’ Blum is also the author of Rogue State: A Guide to the World’s Only Superpower, West-Bloc Dissident: A Cold War Memoir, and Freeing the World to Death: Essays on the American Empire.
  • 2008-2009 ANES Panel Study Questionnaires American National Election Studies August 2010

    2008-2009 ANES Panel Study Questionnaires American National Election Studies August 2010

    2008-2009 ANES Panel Study Questionnaires American National Election Studies August 2010 This document contains the questionnaire programming specifications for the ANES- sponsored questionnaires from the 2008-2009 ANES Panel Study: January, February, June, September, October, and November 2008 and January, May, July, and August 2009 are included. Some questions from January and August 2009 were not sponsored by ANES and these non-ANES questions are shaded in gray to distinguish them from ANES-sponsored content. These questionnaires were administered entirely over the Internet. The document also contains the specifications for the recruitment questionnaire (administered primarily over the telephone, but which also existed in an Internet version) and the Internet profile survey. Questionnaires from other waves of the survey (in March, April, May, July, August, and December 2008 and February, March, April, June, and September 2009) were not sponsored by ANES. Those questionnaires are part of the supplemental data package for the study. Contents of this Document 1. How to Read the Questionnaires..................................................................................... 1 2. Wave 1 (January) questionnaire...................................................................................... 5 3. Wave 2 (February) questionnaire.................................................................................. 61 4. Wave 6 (June) questionnaire....................................................................................... 122
  • United States Detention Policy in Counterterrorism and Counterinsurgency Operations: 2001 to 2011

    United States Detention Policy in Counterterrorism and Counterinsurgency Operations: 2001 to 2011

    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ United States Detention Policy in Counterterrorism and Counterinsurgency Operations: 2001 to 2011 Qureshi, Ahmed Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 25. Sep. 2021 This electronic theses or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ Title: United States Detention Policy in Counterterrorism and Counterinsurgency Operations: 2001 to 2011 Author: Ahmed Qureshi The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement.
  • Steuben County 2004 General Election Results

    Steuben County 2004 General Election Results

    Steuben County General Election 11/22/2004 84 districts out of 84 reported ******* OFFICIAL RESULTS ******* County Wide PRESIDENTIAL ELECTORS FOR PRESIDENT AND VICE-PRESIDENT (Vote ONCE) 1A George W. Bush / Dick Cheney - REP 26066 1B John F. Kerry / John Edwards - DEM 14090 1C Ralph Nader / Jan D. Pierce - IND 600 1D George W. Bush / Dick Cheney - CON 914 1E John F. Kerry / John Edwards - WOR 433 1F Ralph Nader / Peter Miguel Camejo - PJP 93 1G Roger Calero / Arrin Hawkins - SWP 11 1H Michael Badnarik / Richard V. Campagna - LBT 66 W1 David Cobb - Write-In 5 W10 Hillary Clinton - Write-In 1 W11 Bradley Davis - Write-In 1 W12 Elizabeth J. Hyler - Write-In 1 W2 Michael Halpin - Write-In 0 W3 John Joseph Kennedy - Write-In 0 W4 Michael A. Peroutka - Write-In 6 W5 Bill Van Auken - Write-In 0 W6 John Mc Cain - Write-In 6 W7 Rudy Giuliani - Write-In 1 W8 Colin Powell - Write-In 2 W9 Dennis Kucinich - Write-In 2 YY Blank - 352 ZZ Void - 36 County Wide UNITED STATES SENATOR (Vote for ONE) 2A Howard Mills - REP 16379 2B Charles E. Schumer - DEM 16224 2C Charles E. Schumer - IND 1328 2D Marilyn F. O'Grady - CON 1282 2E Charles E. Schumer - WOR 615 2F Abraham Hirschfeld - BLD 112 2G Martin Koppel - SWP 66 2H Donald Silberger - LBT 109 2I David E. McReynolds - GRE 201 John Mc Cain - Write-In 1 Hillary Clinton - Write-In 1 Ashley L. Easton - Write-In 1 Samuel B. Turner - Write-In 1 Blank - 6330 Void - 36 County Wide JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT (7th District) (Vote for ANY TWO) 3A Thomas A.