DOCSLIB.ORG

Field Release of the Insects Calophya Latiforceps

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

United States Department of Field Release of the Insects Agriculture Calophya latiforceps Marketing and Regulatory (Hemiptera: Calophyidae) and Programs Pseudophilothrips ichini Animal and Plant Health Inspection (Thysanoptera: Service Phlaeothripidae) for Classical Biological Control of Brazilian Peppertree in the Contiguous United States Environmental Assessment, May 2019 Field Release of the Insects Calophya latiforceps (Hemiptera: Calophyidae) and Pseudophilothrips ichini (Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae) for Classical Biological Control of Brazilian Peppertree in the Contiguous United States Environmental Assessment, May 2019 Agency Contact: Colin D. Stewart, Assistant Director Pests, Pathogens, and Biocontrol Permits Plant Protection and Quarantine Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service U.S. Department of Agriculture 4700 River Rd., Unit 133 Riverdale, MD 20737 Non-Discrimination Policy The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination against its customers, employees, and applicants for employment on the bases of race, color, national origin, age, disability, sex, gender identity, religion, reprisal, and where applicable, political beliefs, marital status, familial or parental status, sexual orientation, or all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program, or protected genetic information in employment or in any program or activity conducted or funded by the Department. (Not all prohibited bases will apply to all programs and/or employment activities.) To File an Employment Complaint If you wish to file an employment complaint, you must contact your agency's EEO Counselor (PDF) within 45 days of the date of the alleged discriminatory act, event, or in the case of a personnel action. Additional information can be found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_file.html. To File a Program Complaint If you wish to file a Civil Rights program complaint of discrimination, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form (PDF), found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html, or at any USDA office, or call (866) 632-9992 to request the form. You may also write a letter containing all of the information requested in the form. Send your completed complaint form or letter to us by mail at U.S. Department of Agriculture, Director, Office of Adjudication, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, by fax (202) 690-7442 or email at [email protected]. Persons With Disabilities Individuals who are deaf, hard of hearing, or have speech disabilities and you wish to file either an EEO or program complaint please contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339 or (800) 845- 6136 (in Spanish). Persons with disabilities who wish to file a program complaint, please see information above on how to contact us by mail directly or by email. If you require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) please contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). Mention of companies or commercial products in this report does not imply recommendation or endorsement by USDA over others not mentioned. USDA neither guarantees nor warrants the standard of any product mentioned. Product names are mentioned to report factually on available data and to provide specific information. This publication reports research involving pesticides. All uses of pesticides must be registered by appropriate State and/or Federal agencies before they can be recommended. CAUTION: Pesticides can be injurious to humans, domestic animals, desirable plants, and fish and other wildlife—if they are not handled or applied properly. Use all pesticides selectively and carefully. Follow recommended label practices for the use and disposal of pesticides and pesticide containers. Contents I. Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action .................................................................................................... 1 II. Alternatives ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 A. No Action ..................................................................................................................................................................... 3 B. Issue Permits for Environmental Release of C. latiforceps .......................................................................................... 5 C. Issue Permits for Environmental Release of P. ichini ................................................................................................... 9 D. Issue Permits for Environmental Release of Both C. latiforceps and P. ichini (Preferred Alternative) ..................... 12 III. Affected Environment .................................................................................................................................. 12 A. Taxonomy of Brazilian Peppertree ............................................................................................................................. 12 B. Areas Affected by Brazilian Peppertree ..................................................................................................................... 13 C. Plants Related to Brazilian Peppertree and Their Distribution ................................................................................... 14 IV. Environmental Consequences .................................................................................................................... 16 A. No Action ................................................................................................................................................................... 16 B. Issue Permits for Environmental Release of C. latiforceps ........................................................................................ 19 C. Issue Permits for Environmental Release of P. ichini ................................................................................................. 25 D. Issue Permits for Environmental Release of Both C. latiforceps and P. ichini .......................................................... 31 V. Other Issues ................................................................................................................................................. 31 VI. Agencies, Organizations, and Individuals Consulted ................................................................................... 32 VII. References ................................................................................................................................................. 34 Appendix 1. ...................................................................................................................................................................... 49 Appendix 2. ...................................................................................................................................................................... 59 Appendix 3. ...................................................................................................................................................................... 60 Appendix 4. ...................................................................................................................................................................... 63 Appendix 5. ...................................................................................................................................................................... 69 Appendix 6. ...................................................................................................................................................................... 74 Appendix 7. ...................................................................................................................................................................... 76 I. Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ), Pests, Pathogens, and Biocontrol Permits (PPBP) is proposing to issue permits for environmental release of two insects, Calophya latiforceps (Hemiptera: Calophyidae) and Pseudophilothrips ichini (Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae). These agents would be used for the biological control of Brazilian peppertree, Schinus terebinthifolia (Anacardiaceae), in the contiguous United States. This environmental assessment1 (EA) has been prepared, consistent with USDA, APHIS' National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) implementing procedures (Title 7 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), part 372). It examines the potential effects on the quality of the human environment that may be associated with the release of C. latiforceps and P. ichini to control infestations of Brazilian pepperweed within the contiguous United States. This EA considers the potential effects of the proposed action and its alternatives, including no action. Notice of this EA was made available in the Federal Register on February 27, 2019 for a 30-day public comment period. APHIS received a total of 129 comments on the EA by the close of the comment period. Most comments (120) were in favor of the release of the biological control agents. Nine comments were either not in favor of or raised concerns regarding the release of the two agents. These comments are addressed in appendix 7 of this document. Classical biological control
Recommended publications
  • Tamarind 1990 - 2004

    Tamarind 1990 - 2004

    Tamarind 1990 - 2004 Author A. K. A. Dandjouma, C. Tchiegang, C. Kapseu and R. Ndjouenkeu Title Ricinodendron heudelotii (Bail.) Pierre ex Pax seeds treatments influence on the q Year 2004 Source title Rivista Italiana delle Sostanze Grasse Reference 81(5): 299-303 Abstract The effects of heating Ricinodendron heudelotii seeds on the quality of the oil extracted was studied. The seeds were preheated by dry and wet methods at three temperatures (50, 70 and 90 degrees C) for 10, 20, 30 and 60 minutes. The oil was extracted using the Soxhlet method with hexane. The results showed a significant change in oil acid value when heated at 90 degrees C for 60 minutes, with values of 2.76+or-0.18 for the dry method and 2.90+or-0.14 for the wet method. Heating at the same conditions yielded peroxide values of 10.70+or-0.03 for the dry method and 11.95+or-0.08 for the wet method. Author A. L. Khandare, U. Kumar P, R. G. Shanker, K. Venkaiah and N. Lakshmaiah Title Additional beneficial effect of tamarind ingestion over defluoridated water supply Year 2004 Source title Nutrition Reference 20(5): 433-436 Abstract Objective: We evaluated the effect of tamarind (Tamarindus indicus) on ingestion and whether it provides additional beneficial effects on mobilization of fluoride from the bone after children are provided defluoridated water. Methods: A randomized, diet control study was conducted in 30 subjects from a fluoride endemic area after significantly decreasing urinary fluoride excretion by supplying defluoridated water for 2 wk.
  • New and Revised Life History of the Florida Hairstreak Eumaeus Atala

    New and Revised Life History of the Florida Hairstreak Eumaeus Atala

    New and Revised Life History of the Florida Hairstreak Eumaeus atala (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) with Notes on its Current Conservation Status Author(s): Sandy Koi and Jaret Daniels Source: Florida Entomologist, 98(4):1134-1147. Published By: Florida Entomological Society DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1653/024.098.0418 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1653/024.098.0418 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. New and revised life history of the Florida hairstreak Eumaeus atala (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) with notes on its current conservation status Sandy Koi1* and Jaret Daniels2,3 Abstract Southeast Florida is considered part of the Caribbean archipelago and a biodiversity hotspot for conservation priorities, with many endangered spe- cies precinctive to the Lower Peninsula. The tropical butterflyEumaeus atala (Poey) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) is currently found in Southeast Florida, the Caribbean, Cayman Islands, and Cuba, but was once considered probably extinct in Southeast Florida, where it has made a significant population increase during the past 30 yr.
  • Florida Entomologist Published by the Florida Entomological Society Volume 99, Number 3 — September 2016

    Florida Entomologist Published by the Florida Entomological Society Volume 99, Number 3 — September 2016

    Florida Entomologist Published by the Florida Entomological Society Volume 99, Number 3 — September 2016 Research Papers Romo-Asunción, Diana, Marco Antonio Ávila-Calderón, Miguel Angel Ramos-López, Juan Esteban Barranco-Florido, Silvia Rodríguez-Navarro, Sergio Romero-Gomez, Eugenia Josefina Aldeco-Pérez, Juan Ramiro Pacheco-Aguilar, and Miguel Angel Rico-Rodríguez—Juvenomimetic and insecticidal activitiesSenecio of salignus (Asteraceae) and Salvia microphylla (Lamiaceae) on Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) . 345-351 Barroso-Aké, Hanzel J., Juan Cibrián-Tovar, Obdulia L. Segura-León, and Ausencio Azuara-Domínguez—Pre-courtship behavior and the effect of age on its duration in Diatraea magnifactella (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) . 352-354 Sisson, Melissa S., Carlos A. Santamaria, Autumn J. Smith-Herron, Tamara J. Cook, and Jerry L. Cook—Geographical color pattern of Argia apicalis (Odonata: Coenagrionidae) in the absence of molecular variation . 355-362 Tillman, P. Glynn and Ted E. Cottrell—Stink bugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in pheromone-baited traps near crop field edges in Georgia, USA . 363-370 Song, YueHua, ZiZhong Li, and RenHuai Dai—A remarkable new genus and species of Erythroneurini (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Typhlocybinae) from China . 371-375 Hernández-Baz, Fernando, Helena Romo, Jorge M. González, María de Jesús Martínez Hernández, and Roberto Gámez Pastrana—Maximum entropy niche-based modeling (Maxent) of potential geographical distribution of Coreura albicosta (Lepidoptera: Erebidae: Ctenuchina) in Mexico . 376-380 Bortoli, Lígia Caroline, Ruben Machota Jr., Flávio Roberto Mello Garcia, and Marcos Botton—Evaluation of food lures for fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) captured in a citrus orchard of the Serra Gaúcha . 381-384 Zheng, Min-Lin, Cornelis van Achterberg, and Jia-Hua Chen—A new species of the genus Proantrusa Tobias (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Alysiinae) from northwestern China .
  • Recovery Plan for Tyoj5llllt . I-Bland Plants

    Recovery Plan for Tyoj5llllt . I-Bland Plants

    Recovery Plan for tYOJ5llllt. i-bland Plants RECOVERY PLAN FOR MULTI-ISLAND PLANTS Published by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon Approved: Date: / / As the Nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has responsibility for most ofour nationally owned public lands and natural resources. This includes fostering the wisest use ofour land and water resources, protecting our fish and wildlife, preserving the environmental and cultural values ofour national parks and historical places, and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Department assesses our energy and mineral resources and works to assure that their development is in the best interests ofall our people. The Department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in island Territories under U.S. administration. DISCLAIMER PAGE Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, sometimes prepared with the assistance ofrecovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Costs indicated for task implementation and/or time for achievement ofrecovery are only estimates and are subject to change. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor the official positions or approval ofany individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, otherthan the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. They represent the official position ofthe U.S.
  • Open SK Thesis Finalversion.Pdf

    Open SK Thesis Finalversion.Pdf

    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School EXAMINING REGIONAL TRENDS IN PENNSYLVANIA GRÜNER VELTLINER WINES USING INSTRUMENTAL AND HUMAN SENSORY METHODS A Thesis in Food Science by Stephanie Keller Ó 2020 Stephanie Keller Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science August 2020 ii The thesis of Stephanie Keller was reviewed and approved by the following: Helene Hopfer Assistant Professor of Food Science Thesis Co-Advisor Ryan J. Elias Professor of Food Science Thesis Co-Advisor Michela Centinari Associate Professor of Viticulture Robert F. Roberts Professor of Food Science Head of the Department of Food Science iii ABSTRACT It is often said that high quality grapes must be used in order to create high quality wines. This production begins in the vineyard and is impacted by viticultural and environmental conditions that may or may not be able to be controlled. Weather conditions are among these uncontrollable factors, and the influence of weather conditions on final grape and wine quality has been the subject of investigation in both research and industry for many years. Many studies have determined that factors such as rainfall, sunlight exposure, and temperature play an important role in the development of phenolic and aromatic compounds and their precursors in berries, which ultimately affects wine aroma, taste, and flavor. Examination of weather conditions and climate in wine regions have been the subject of studies not only to understand impacts on wine quality attributes, but also to determine if regional trends exist for particular areas. The concept of regionality, or the particular style of wine that a growing region produces, is a new area of study for the Eastern United States, including Pennsylvania, which is the focus of this study.
  • 21 CFR Ch. I (4–1–10 Edition) § 582.20

    21 CFR Ch. I (4–1–10 Edition) § 582.20

    § 582.20 21 CFR Ch. I (4–1–10 Edition) Common name Botanical name of plant source Marjoram, sweet .......................................................................... Majorana hortensis Moench. Mustard, black or brown .............................................................. Brassica nigra (L.) Koch. Mustard, brown ............................................................................ Brassica juncea (L.) Coss. Mustard, white or yellow .............................................................. Brassica hirta Moench. Nutmeg ........................................................................................ Myristica fragrans Houtt. Oregano (oreganum, Mexican oregano, Mexican sage, origan) Lippia spp. Paprika ......................................................................................... Capsicum annuum L. Parsley ......................................................................................... Petroselinum crispum (Mill.) Mansf. Pepper, black ............................................................................... Piper nigrum L. Pepper, cayenne ......................................................................... Capsicum frutescens L. or Capsicum annuum L. Pepper, red .................................................................................. Do. Pepper, white ............................................................................... Piper nigrum L. Peppermint .................................................................................. Mentha piperita L. Poppy seed
  • BÖCEKLERİN SINIFLANDIRILMASI (Takım Düzeyinde)

    BÖCEKLERİN SINIFLANDIRILMASI (Takım Düzeyinde)

    BÖCEKLERİN SINIFLANDIRILMASI (TAKIM DÜZEYİNDE) GÖKHAN AYDIN 2016 Editör : Gökhan AYDIN Dizgi : Ziya ÖNCÜ ISBN : 978-605-87432-3-6 Böceklerin Sınıflandırılması isimli eğitim amaçlı hazırlanan bilgisayar programı için lütfen aşağıda verilen linki tıklayarak programı ücretsiz olarak bilgisayarınıza yükleyin. http://atabeymyo.sdu.edu.tr/assets/uploads/sites/76/files/siniflama-05102016.exe Eğitim Amaçlı Bilgisayar Programı ISBN: 978-605-87432-2-9 İçindekiler İçindekiler i Önsöz vi 1. Protura - Coneheads 1 1.1 Özellikleri 1 1.2 Ekonomik Önemi 2 1.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 2 2. Collembola - Springtails 3 2.1 Özellikleri 3 2.2 Ekonomik Önemi 4 2.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 4 3. Thysanura - Silverfish 6 3.1 Özellikleri 6 3.2 Ekonomik Önemi 7 3.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 7 4. Microcoryphia - Bristletails 8 4.1 Özellikleri 8 4.2 Ekonomik Önemi 9 5. Diplura 10 5.1 Özellikleri 10 5.2 Ekonomik Önemi 10 5.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 11 6. Plocoptera – Stoneflies 12 6.1 Özellikleri 12 6.2 Ekonomik Önemi 12 6.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 13 7. Embioptera - webspinners 14 7.1 Özellikleri 15 7.2 Ekonomik Önemi 15 7.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 15 8. Orthoptera–Grasshoppers, Crickets 16 8.1 Özellikleri 16 8.2 Ekonomik Önemi 16 8.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 17 i 9. Phasmida - Walkingsticks 20 9.1 Özellikleri 20 9.2 Ekonomik Önemi 21 9.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 21 10. Dermaptera - Earwigs 23 10.1 Özellikleri 23 10.2 Ekonomik Önemi 24 10.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 24 11. Zoraptera 25 11.1 Özellikleri 25 11.2 Ekonomik Önemi 25 11.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 26 12.
  • I N D E X Sporarum Et Seminum Quae Hortus Botanicus

    I N D E X Sporarum Et Seminum Quae Hortus Botanicus

    I N D E X SPORARUM ET SEMINUM QUAE HORTUS BOTANICUS INSTITUTI SUPERIORIS AGRONOMIAE PRO MUTUA COMMUTATIONE OFFERT ANNO 2021 Prof. Maria Romeiras Botanicae Professor Directorium Eng. Mª Teresa Vasconcelos Botanicae Arq. Pais. Ana Raquel Cunha Eng. Paulo Forte Isabel Fernandes Horti Praefectus, Seminum Curator, Seminum Collector DELECTUM SEMINUM DESIDERATORUM ANTE d. 30 Julii 2021 ROGAMUS [email protected] ebgconsortiumindexseminum2021 Ginkgoopsida Ginkgoaceae 101. Ginkgo biloba L. (XX-0-AJUDA-21.101) Pinopsida Araucariaceae 102. Araucaria bidwillii Hook. (XX-0-AJUDA-21.102) Cupressaceae 103. Chamaecyparis formosensis Matsum. (XX-0-AJUDA-21.103) 104. Cupressus goveniana Gordon (XX-0-AJUDA-21.104) 105. Cupressus lusitanica Mill. var. lusitanica (XX-0-AJUDA-21.105) 106. Cupressus torulosa D.Don (XX-0-AJUDA-21.106) 107. Juniperus phoenicea L. var. turbinata (Guss.) Parl. (XX-0-AJUDA-21.107) 108. Platycladus orientalis (L.) Franco (XX-0-AJUDA-21.108) 109. Tetraclinis articulata (Vahl) Mast. (XX-0-AJUDA-21.109) Pinaceae 110. Cedrus deodara (Roxb.ex D.Don) G.Don (XX-0-AJUDA-21.110) Podocarpaceae 111. Afrocarpus mannii (Hook. f.) C.N.Page (XX-0-AJUDA-21.111) Taxaceae 112. Taxus baccata L. (XX-0-AJUDA-21.112) Taxodiaceae 113. Cunninghamia konishii Hayata (XX-0-AJUDA-21.113) 114. Taxodium distichum (L.) Rich. (XX-0-AJUDA-21.114) Gnetopsida Ephedraceae 115. Ephedra foeminea Forssk. (XX-0-AJUDA-21.115) Magnoliopsida Acanthaceae 116. Acanthus mollis L. (XX-0-AJUDA-21.116) Aceraceae 117. Acer buergerianum Miq. (XX-0-AJUDA-21.117) 118. Acer campestre L. (XX-0-AJUDA-21.118) 119. Acer monspessulanum L.
  • The Correct Gender of Schinus (Anacardiaceae)

    The Correct Gender of Schinus (Anacardiaceae)

    Phytotaxa 222 (1): 075–077 ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press Correspondence ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.222.1.9 The correct gender of Schinus (Anacardiaceae) SCOTT ZONA Dept. of Biological Sciences, OE 167, Florida International University, 11200 SW 8 St., Miami, Florida 33199 USA; [email protected] Species of the genus Schinus Linnaeus (1753) (Anacardiaceae) are native to the Americas but are found in many tropical and subtropical parts of the world, where they are cultivated as ornamentals or crops (“pink peppercorns”) or they are invasive weeds. Schinus molle L. (1753: 388) is a cultivated ornamental tree in Australia, California, Mexico, the Canary Islands, the Mediterranean, and elsewhere (US Forest Service 2015). In Hawaii, Florida, South Africa, Mascarene Islands, and Australia, Schinus terebinthifolia Raddi (1820: 399) is an aggressively invasive pest plant, costing governments millions of dollars in damages and control (Ferriter 1997). Despite being an important and widely known genus, the gender of the genus name is a source of tremendous nomenclatural confusion, if one judges from the orthographic variants of the species epithets. Of the 38 accepted species and infraspecific taxa on The Plant List (theplantlist.org, ver. 1.1), one is a duplicated name, 18 are masculine epithets (but ten of these are substantive epithets honoring men and are thus properly masculine [Nicolson 1974]), 12 are feminine epithets (one of which, arenicola, is always feminine [Stearn 1983]), and seven have epithets that are the same in any gender (or have no gender, as in the case of S.
  • GREAT PLAINS REGION - NWPL 2016 FINAL RATINGS User Notes: 1) Plant Species Not Listed Are Considered UPL for Wetland Delineation Purposes

    GREAT PLAINS REGION - NWPL 2016 FINAL RATINGS User Notes: 1) Plant Species Not Listed Are Considered UPL for Wetland Delineation Purposes

    GREAT PLAINS REGION - NWPL 2016 FINAL RATINGS User Notes: 1) Plant species not listed are considered UPL for wetland delineation purposes. 2) A few UPL species are listed because they are rated FACU or wetter in at least one Corps region.
  • Efficacy and Host Specificity Compared Between Two Populations of The

    Efficacy and Host Specificity Compared Between Two Populations of The

    Biological Control 65 (2013) 53–62 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Biological Control journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ybcon Efficacy and host specificity compared between two populations of the psyllid Aphalara itadori, candidates for biological control of invasive knotweeds in North America ⇑ Fritzi Grevstad a, , Richard Shaw b, Robert Bourchier c, Paolo Sanguankeo d, Ghislaine Cortat e, Richard C. Reardon f a Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA b CABI, Bakeham Lane, Egham, Surrey TW20 9TY, United Kingdom c Agriculture and AgriFood Canada-Lethbridge Research Centre, Lethbridge, AB, Canada T1J 4B1 d Olympic Natural Resources Center, University of Washington, Forks, WA 98331, USA e CABI, CH 2800 Delemont, Switzerland f USDA Forest Service, Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA highlights graphical abstract " Two populations of the psyllid Aphalara itadori are effective at reducing knotweed growth and biomass. " The two populations differ in their performance among different knotweed species. " Development of A. itadori occurred infrequently on several non-target plant species. " The psyllid exhibited non-preference and an inability to persist on non- target plants. article info abstract Article history: Invasive knotweeds are large perennial herbs in the Polygonaceae in the genus Fallopia that are native to Received 2 February 2012 Asia and invasive in North America. They include Fallopia japonica (Japanese knotweed), F. sachalinensis Accepted 4 January 2013 (giant knotweed), and a hybrid species F. x bohemica (Bohemian knotweed). Widespread throughout Available online 12 January 2013 the continent and difficult to control by mechanical or chemical methods, these plants are good targets for classical biological control.
  • Risk Assessment for Adult Butterflies Exposed to the Mosquito Control Pesticide Naled

    Risk Assessment for Adult Butterflies Exposed to the Mosquito Control Pesticide Naled

    Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry # 2012 SETAC Printed in the USA DOI: 10.1002/etc.1757 Hazard/Risk Assessment RISK ASSESSMENT FOR ADULT BUTTERFLIES EXPOSED TO THE MOSQUITO CONTROL PESTICIDE NALED TIMOTHY A. BARGAR* Southeast Ecological Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Gainesville, Florida (Submitted 22 June 2011; Returned for Revision 11 October 2011; Accepted 23 November 2011) Abstract—A prospective risk assessment was conducted for adult butterflies potentially exposed to the mosquito control insecticide naled. Published acute mortality data, exposure data collected during field studies, and morphometric data (total surface area and fresh body weight) for adult butterflies were combined in a probabilistic estimate of the likelihood that adult butterfly exposure to naled following aerial applications would exceed levels associated with acute mortality. Adult butterfly exposure was estimated based on the product of (1) naled residues on samplers and (2) an exposure metric that normalized total surface area for adult butterflies to their fresh weight. The likelihood that the 10th percentile refined effect estimate for adult butterflies exposed to naled would be exceeded following aerial naled applications was 67 to 80%. The greatest risk would be for butterflies in the family Lycaenidae, and the lowest risk would be for those in the family Hesperidae, assuming equivalent sensitivity to naled. A range of potential guideline naled deposition levels is presented that, if not exceeded, would reduce the risk of adult butterfly mortality. The results for this risk assessment were compared with other risk estimates for butterflies, and the implications for adult butterflies in areas targeted by aerial naled applications are discussed.