DOCSLIB.ORG

The Computerworld Smithsonian Awards 1 Nm Fk I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The Computerworld Smithsonian Awards 1 nm fk i sifigy nmm mm % 1 c, r fl ft 5 tffWS111 ■ 1 The Computerworld SmithsonianAwards arepresented on an annual basis to recognize andpromote the outstanding achievements ofindividuals who use information technologyfor the benefit of mankind. In order to unlock the truly evolutionary power of information technology, it must be linked closely to human values which drivepositive change: Cooperation. Leadership. Dedication. Responsibility. Vision. In making heroes of those who guide the use of information technology with these values in mind, standards will be setfor succeeding generations as we enter the 21st century. Remarkable achievements will be attained if information technology is applied to seemingly insurmountable problems. It is the goal of thisprogram to encourage individuals in their struggle to solve such problems, and to recognize thempubliclywhen they succeed. The Computerworld Smithsonian Awards were established in 1989 to demystify information technology for the general public. Award winners become part of the ongoing Information Age exhibit at the Smithsonian Institutions National Museum of American History. As part of the Smithsonian's collection, the winners' names and applications will become a permanent part of the history of information technology in the United States of America. The Awards are presented in June of each year. Major partners of the Computerworld Smithsonian Awards include a select group of sponsoring com- panies, the Chairmen's Committee, Computerworld and the SmithsonianInstitution's National Museum of American History. The Computerworld Smithsonian Awards will be presented in thefollowing ten categories: Business, Education, Environment, Finance, Government, Manufacturing, Media, Medicine, Science and Transportation. Nominationsfor the Computerworld Smithsonian Awards clearly demonstrate the positive impact of information technology. Winners ofthe Computerworld Smithsonian Awards have demonstrated that information technology can: / Help locate missing children. y/* Ensure that blood supplies are clean and adequate. Amass and coordinate crucial environmental information, helping us to plan more effectively for a sustainable future. Broadcast vital issues instantly across the globe. 4* ST' Automatically warn communities of impending emergencies. Empower poor and disadvantaged students to achieve newlevels of learning. V Enable us to track and understand world weather patterns. ■. Spot forest fires in remote and fragile wilderness areas. Help educate the illiterate. Give the blind access to powerful tools of communication. iate lifesavine information Coordinate lifesaving information "Ify in times of emergency such as floods, fires or earthquakes. Help physically-challenged people to interact with the world. %, Richard Stewart Charles E. Exley, Jr. Computer Corporation NCRCorporation ofAmerica Steven R Jobs Robert M. Price NeXT, Inc. Control Data Richard L. Nolan Corporation Nolan, Norton & Co. John A. Rollwagen Research, Raymond J. Noorda Cray Inc. Novell, Inc. R John Imlay, Jr. William C. Ferguson D & B Software NYNEX Corporation Edson D. deCastro Data General Jack M. Berdy On-lineSoftware Corporation International, Inc. Michael M. Michigami Lawrence J. Ellison The Computerworld Datapoint Corporation Oracle Corporation SmithsonianAwards Jack C. Davis Dataproducts Robert H. Cawly Tel: 617-349-3704 Corporation Price Waterhouse Fax: 617-349-3599 JamesH. Goodnight William Atkins SAS Institute Inc. The Chairmen's Deloitte & louche Committeeserves as R. James Macaleer the select nominating Robert W Mahoney Diebold, SharedMedical for theAwards, Incorporated Systems Corporation froup'he 1991 members Kenneth H. Olsen include: Digital Equipment Hans Decker Corporation Siemens Corporation Patrick J. McGovern Michael J.King LesAlberthal o « International Data Software1 AG ofNorth Group EDS AmiAmerica,"p Inc. Eugene R. Kunde 01 Fritz Landmann America, Salvatore Simeone Computerworld Epson Inc. Softwareq r. Engineering G. Steven Burrill ofAmerica,A Inc. RogerKennedy Ernst & of National Museum of Young Ryaln i R. Poppa American History Desmond Cunningham Storage Technology Smithsonian Institution Gandalf Corporation Inc. John C. Lewis Technologies William E. Foster Amdahl Corporation John A.Young Stratus Computer, Inc. Hewlett-Packard George T. Shaheen Scott G. McNealy Andersen Consulting Company Sun Microsystems, Inc. B. Moore John Sculley Gary Mark B. Hoffman Apple Computer, Inc. Hitachi Data Systems Sybase, Inc. John E Akers Edward M. Esber, Jr. IBM Corporation Robert E. Cook Ashton-Tate Systems Inc. Corporation Gerald D. Cohen Builders, Inc. Eric A. Benhamou Robert E. Allen Information 3Com Corporation AT&T Roger J. Sippl Inc. James G. Treybig David C. Mahoney Informix Software, Tandem Computers Banyan Systems Inc. Gary J. Morgenthaler Incorporated Philippe Kahn Ingres Corporation Larry Michels Borland Francis A.Tarkenton The Santa Cruz International, Inc. KnowledgeWare, Inc. Operation Roland D. Pampel Jim Manzi William R. Johnson Bull HN Information LotusDevelopment Toshiba America Systems Inc. Corporation Information Systems, Inc. GordonA. Campbell William G. McGowan Casey Cowell Chips and MCI Communications U.S. Robotics Technologies, Inc. E Mark Kuhlmann W Michael Blumenthal Thomas M. Nies McDonnellDouglas Unisys Corporation Cincom Systems, Inc. Integration Systems Richard W Miller Kenneth N. Pontikes Company WangLaboratories,Inc. Comdisco, Inc. T. H. Bruggere Mentor Graphics Bernard K. Tse Benjamin M. Rosen Corporation Wyse Technology Inc. Compaq Computer David T. Kearns Corporation Bill Gates Microsoft Corporation XeroxCorporation Charles B. Wang P Frank Computer Associates George M. C. Fisher John International, Zenith Data Systems Inc. Motorola Inc. Corporation Center, The Computerworld Smithsonian Awards The Computerworld Smithsonian Award Program was founded in 1989 to honor men and women who have achieved outstanding progress for society through the visionary use of information technology. By recognizing these individuals we seek to demystify public perceptions of computer technology and to clearly identify the benefits this technology brings to the lives of the general public. The Smithsonian Institution's National Museum of American History joined with Computerworld, the leading newsweekly in the information industry, and our Chairmen's Committee to seek out these individuals. The Chairmen's Committee is comprised of 72 ofthe leading chairmen in the information technology industry. These chairmen and their companies serve as the select nominating group for the Awards. The Computerworld Smithsonian Awards is a nonprofit program. The Smithsonian Institution will be the recipient of an annual endowment generated from the Awards. All winners will be displayed in the Information Age Exhibit at the museum. In addition, all nominations will become part of an on-going national historical database of applications of information technology which will track, over time, the ways in which technology contributes to positive change in our world. 11A MountAuburn Street Cambridge, MA 02138 USA Tel: 617-349-3704 Fax: 617-349-3599 IT~ Smithsonia„ lns„tutiontHNEWS Media only: Susan Foster (202) 357-3129 Sept. 27, 1990 Smithsonian Institution Joan Geoghegan (617) 661-6330 Cudaback Strategic Communications SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ESTABLISHES NATIONAL DATA BASE FROM COMPUTERWORLD SMITHSONIAN AWARD NOMINATIONS The Smithsonian's National Museum of American History has announced the creation of a national historical data base drawn from the nominations for the annual Computerworld Smithsonian Awards David Allison, curator in the museum's Division of Computers, Information and Society, said the data are historically valuable because the awards process is a careful annual review of information technology and its changing impact on society In the past two years of the awards program, more than 400 nominations describing new applications of information technology have been submitted for consideration. Award winners are chosen by an independent panel of experts in the computer field. Last years winners included Berkeley Systems, for its "outSPOKEN speech synthesizer for the visually impaired and learning disabled"; and Purdue University for its use of supercomputer calculations to analyze surface features and interaction of viruses at atomic resolutions The Computerworld Smithsonian Awards, a non-profit program, is the only national program honoring the innovative uses of information technology. The awards program is designed to recognize outstanding technological innovation, demystify public perceptions about technology and identify the benefits that technology brings to the public. SI-416-90 more- Oifice of Public Affairs, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560 (202) 357-2627 *.» - 2 The awards program is a partnership between the Smithsonian Institution, Computerworld and a committee of 65 leading chairmen and companies from the information industry. The data base will become part of the Division of Computers, Information and Society research collection, which includes historical artifacts, oral histories of many computer pioneers, photographs, films and video materials. ## # # The Chairmen's Gary J. Morgenthaler The Committee Ingres Corporation Computerworld Smithsonian Awards Patrick J. McGovern Francis A.Tarkenton International Data KnowledgeWare, Inc. Group Jim Manzi Fritz Landmann Lotus Development Computerworld Corporation RogerKennedy William G. McGowan
Recommended publications
  • Validated Products List, 1995 No. 3: Programming Languages, Database

    Validated Products List, 1995 No. 3: Programming Languages, Database

    NISTIR 5693 (Supersedes NISTIR 5629) VALIDATED PRODUCTS LIST Volume 1 1995 No. 3 Programming Languages Database Language SQL Graphics POSIX Computer Security Judy B. Kailey Product Data - IGES Editor U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Technology Administration National Institute of Standards and Technology Computer Systems Laboratory Software Standards Validation Group Gaithersburg, MD 20899 July 1995 QC 100 NIST .056 NO. 5693 1995 NISTIR 5693 (Supersedes NISTIR 5629) VALIDATED PRODUCTS LIST Volume 1 1995 No. 3 Programming Languages Database Language SQL Graphics POSIX Computer Security Judy B. Kailey Product Data - IGES Editor U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Technology Administration National Institute of Standards and Technology Computer Systems Laboratory Software Standards Validation Group Gaithersburg, MD 20899 July 1995 (Supersedes April 1995 issue) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Ronald H. Brown, Secretary TECHNOLOGY ADMINISTRATION Mary L. Good, Under Secretary for Technology NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY Arati Prabhakar, Director FOREWORD The Validated Products List (VPL) identifies information technology products that have been tested for conformance to Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) in accordance with Computer Systems Laboratory (CSL) conformance testing procedures, and have a current validation certificate or registered test report. The VPL also contains information about the organizations, test methods and procedures that support the validation programs for the FIPS identified in this document. The VPL includes computer language processors for programming languages COBOL, Fortran, Ada, Pascal, C, M[UMPS], and database language SQL; computer graphic implementations for GKS, COM, PHIGS, and Raster Graphics; operating system implementations for POSIX; Open Systems Interconnection implementations; and computer security implementations for DES, MAC and Key Management.
  • Connecticut DEEP's List of Compliant Electronics Manufacturers Notice to Connecticut Retailersi

    Connecticut DEEP's List of Compliant Electronics Manufacturers Notice to Connecticut Retailersi

    Connecticut DEEP’s List of Compliant Electronics manufacturers Notice to Connecticut Retailersi: This list below identifies electronics manufacturers that are in compliance with the registration and payment obligations under Connecticut’s State-wide Electronics Program. Retailers must check this list before selling Covered Electronic Devices (“CEDs”) in Connecticut. If there is a brand of a CED that is not listed below including retail over the internet, the retailer must not sell the CED to Connecticut consumers pursuant to section 22a-634 of the Connecticut General Statutes. Manufacturer Brands CED Type Acer America Corp. Acer Computer, Monitor, Television, Printer eMachines Computer, Monitor Gateway Computer, Monitor, Television ALR Computer, Monitor Gateway 2000 Computer, Monitor AG Neovo Technology AG Neovo Monitor Corporation Amazon Fulfillment Service, Inc. Kindle Computers Amazon Kindle Kindle Fire Fire American Future Technology iBuypower Computer Corporation dba iBuypower Apple, Inc. Apple Computer, Monitor, Printer NeXT Computer, Monitor iMac Computer Mac Pro Computer Mac Mini Computer Thunder Bolt Display Monitor Archos, Inc. Archos Computer ASUS Computer International ASUS Computer, Monitor Eee Computer Nexus ASUS Computer EEE PC Computer Atico International USA, Inc. Digital Prism Television ATYME CORPRATION, INC. ATYME Television Bang & Olufsen Operations A/S Bang & Olufsen Television BenQ America Corp. BenQ Monitor Best Buy Insignia Television Dynex Television UB Computer Toshiba Television VPP Matrix Computer, Monitor Blackberry Limited Balckberry PlayBook Computer Bose Corp. Bose Videowave Television Brother International Corp. Brother Monitor, Printer Canon USA, Inc. Canon Computer, Monitor, Printer Oce Printer Imagistics Printer Cellco Partnership Verizon Ellipsis Computer Changhong Trading Corp. USA Changhong Television (Former Guangdong Changhong Electronics Co. LTD) Craig Electronics Craig Computer, Television Creative Labs, Inc.
  • Case No COMP/M.1694 - EMC / DATA GENERAL

    Case No COMP/M.1694 - EMC / DATA GENERAL

    EN Case No COMP/M.1694 - EMC / DATA GENERAL Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 06/10/1999 Also available in the CELEX database Document No 399M1694 Office for Official Publications of the European Communities L-2985 Luxembourg COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 06.10.1999 SG(99)D/7991 In the published version of this decision, some information has been omitted pursuant to Article 17(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No PUBLIC VERSION 4064/89 concerning non-disclosure of business secrets and other confidential information. The MERGER PROCEDURE omissions are shown thus […]. ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION Where possible the information omitted has been replaced by ranges of figures or a general description. To the notifying party Dear Sirs, Subject : Case No IV/M.1694-EMC/DATA GENERAL Notification of 3-09-19999 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation No 4064/89. 1. On 3 September 1999, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/891 by which EMC Corporation (“EMC”), USA, will acquire sole control of Data General Corporation (“Data General”), USA. 2. After examination of the notification the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 and does not raise serious doubts as to its compatibility with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. I. THE PARTIES 3. EMC Corporation , based in the U.S.A, is active mainly in the design and manufacture of a wide range of information technology products, including hardware, software and related services.
  • Aviion SERVERS and WORKSTATIONS PLUS

    Aviion SERVERS and WORKSTATIONS PLUS

    "Great products ••• fantastic support!" Buzz Van Santvoord, VP of Operations, Plow & Hearth, Inc. Buzz Van Santvoord, Plow & Hearth When you've got 100 telesales reps VP of Operations, and Peter Rice, processing 6,500 orders a day your President, with a selection of items computer system had better work! from their catalogue. Virginia ba ed, Plow & Hearth, Inc. i a $30 million mail order company, specializing in product for country living. Mailing over 20 million catalogue a year and with an e tabli hed ba e of over 1 million cu tomer , it computer y tems are critical to the onver ion of the AOS / VS OBOL program to ACUCOBOL company' ucce and growth. commenced in June and the ystem went live on a Data General A VUON 8500 in September, in plenty of time for the Chri tma ru h. To meet it pecific need Plow & Hearth had inve ted The AIM plu AVUON combination gave the bu ine a dramatic more than $500,000, over a period of 13 year , developing a boo t: "The much fa ter re pon e time improved morale and Data General MY-ba ed y tern in AOS{VS COBOL with 300 increa ed our tele ale capacity without adding a body, and the program and 70 INFOS databa e . But by early 1995 the extra order gained gave u our be t Chri tma ever." company realized that their MY9600 didn't have the capacity to make it through the bu y Chri tma ea on. Expert migration consultants Buzz Van Santvoord, Vice Pre ident of Operation explains: Thi ca e tudy illu trate how Tran oft' AIM offering i more "A move to Open Sy tern wa our preferred strategic direction.
  • FUJITSU LIMITED Annual Report 2002

    FUJITSU LIMITED Annual Report 2002

    FUJITSU LIMITED Annual Report 2002 FUJITSU LIMITED Annual Report 2002 Annual Report 2002 CONTENTS Consolidated Financial Highlights 1 To Our Shareholders 2 Solution Profiles 10 Environmental Activities 14 Social Contributions 15 Management 16 Five-Year Summary 18 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Operations 19 Consolidated Balance Sheets 24 Consolidated Statements of Operations 26 Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity 27 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 28 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 29 Independent Auditors’ Report 46 Principal Subsidiaries and Affiliates 47 Consolidated Financial Highlights Yen U.S. Dollars (millions) (millions) Fujitsu Limited and Consolidated Subsidiaries (except per share data) (except per share data) Years ended March 31 2001 2002 2002 For the year: Net sales ¥5,484,426 ¥ 5,006,977 $37,646 Operating income 244,026 (74,426) (560) Income before income taxes and minority interests 157,564 (594,733) (4,472) Net income 8,521 (382,542) (2,876) Cash flows from operating activities 596,462 306,571 2,305 Per share (Yen and U.S. dollars): Earnings Basic ¥ 4.3 ¥ (193.0) $ (1.451) Diluted 4.3 (193.0) (1.451) Cash flows from operating activities 302.9 154.7 1.163 Cash dividends 10.0 5.0 0.038 Cash dividends to face value 20% 10%10% At year-end: Shareholders' equity ¥1,214,383 ¥ 853,756 $ 6,419 Total assets 5,200,071 4,595,804 34,555 Note: The U.S. dollar amounts above have been translated from yen, for convenience only, at the rate of ¥133 = US$1, the approximate Tokyo foreign exchange market rate on March 31, 2002.
  • DE86 006665 Comparison of the CRAY X-MP-4, Fujitsu VP-200, And

    DE86 006665 Comparison of the CRAY X-MP-4, Fujitsu VP-200, And

    Distribution Category: Mathematics and Computers General (UC-32) ANL--85-1 9 DE86 006665 ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY 9700 South Cass Avenue Argonne, Illinois 60439 Comparison of the CRAY X-MP-4, Fujitsu VP-200, and Hitachi S-810/20: An Argonne Perspcctive Jack J. Dongarra Mathematics and Computer Science Division and Alan Hinds Computing Services October 1985 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency o h ntdSae Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency of the United States employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes ancy thereof, nor any of their bility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any informany legal liability or responsi- process disclosed, or represents that its use would nyinformation, apparatus, product, or ence enceherinherein tooay any specificcomriseii commercial rdt not infringe privately owned rights. Refer- product, process, or service by trade name, trademak manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply itsenrme, r ark, mendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any ag endorsement, recom- and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily st agency thereof. The views United States Government or any agency thereof.ry to or reflect those of the DISTRIBUTION OF THIS DOCUMENT IS UNLIMITE Table of Contents List of Tables v List of Figures v Abstract 1 1. Introduction 1 2. Architectures 1 2.1 CRAY X-MP 2 2.2 Fujitsu VP-200 4 2.3 Hitachi S-810/20 6 3. Comparison of Computers 8 3.1 IBM Compatibility
  • Trade Mark Opposition Decision (O/396/02)

    Trade Mark Opposition Decision (O/396/02)

    TRADE MARKS ACT 1994 IN THE MATTER of application No. 2165852 by Yorkshire Co-operatives Limited and IN THE MATTER of opposition thereto under No. 50738 by Sun Microsystems Incorporated. Background 1. On 6th May 1998 Yorkshire Co-operatives Limited (YCL) applied under the Trade Marks Act 1994 to register the mark SUNWIN for the goods and services specified in ANNEX A. 2. The application was accepted and published. On 21st February 2000 Sun Microsystems Incorporated (‘the opponents’) filed notice of opposition to the application. They are the proprietors of a large quantity of marks, registered in the UK and the under the Community system, a number of which are on display in ANNEX B to this decision. They state that these marks constitute a ‘family’ of marks, and have traded under the SUN and SUN prefixed trade marks since 1983, producing a wide range of ‘..computer hardware, software and other microelectronic goods and services..’ becoming, as a result, a market leader in computer workstations, servers and operating systems. 3. The opponents’ first grounds of opposition to registration is under s. 5(2)(b) of the Act, and relates (in particular, but not exclusively) to the following goods and services which are considered to be similar: Class 9: Computers; computer hardware, software and firmware; scientific apparatus and instruments; apparatus and instruments all for the recordal, storage, transmission and reproduction of audio, visual and audio visual data. Class 38: Installation and repair services relating to electrical apparatus and instruments, data processing apparatus and computers. Class 38: Telecommunications. 4. The opponents also consider that, as their earlier trade marks have a reputation in the United Kingdom, use of the applicants’ mark would be contrary to Section 5(3) of the Act, for goods and services which are not considered similar under Section 5(2).
  • The History of Computing in the History of Technology

    The History of Computing in the History of Technology

    The History of Computing in the History of Technology Michael S. Mahoney Program in History of Science Princeton University, Princeton, NJ (Annals of the History of Computing 10(1988), 113-125) After surveying the current state of the literature in the history of computing, this paper discusses some of the major issues addressed by recent work in the history of technology. It suggests aspects of the development of computing which are pertinent to those issues and hence for which that recent work could provide models of historical analysis. As a new scientific technology with unique features, computing in turn can provide new perspectives on the history of technology. Introduction record-keeping by a new industry of data processing. As a primary vehicle of Since World War II 'information' has emerged communication over both space and t ime, it as a fundamental scientific and technological has come to form the core of modern concept applied to phenomena ranging from information technolo gy. What the black holes to DNA, from the organization of English-speaking world refers to as "computer cells to the processes of human thought, and science" is known to the rest of western from the management of corporations to the Europe as informatique (or Informatik or allocation of global resources. In addition to informatica). Much of the concern over reshaping established disciplines, it has information as a commodity and as a natural stimulated the formation of a panoply of new resource derives from the computer and from subjects and areas of inquiry concerned with computer-based communications technolo gy.
  • ID-83-11 Industrial Policy: Case Studies in the Japanese Experience

    ID-83-11 Industrial Policy: Case Studies in the Japanese Experience

    BY THE US, GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE Report To The Chairman, Joint Economic Committee, United States Congress Industrial Policy: Case Studiesjn The I Japanese Experience i’ ’ Within a larger framework of monetary and fiscal policies, Japan has adopted a number of industry-specific policies to achieve its economic goals. GAO reviewed Japan’s industrial policies during the post-war period in the computer, aircraft, robotics, textile, and shipbuilding industries. Al- though there have been basic underlying consistencies in Japanese policies, there has also been enough flexibility lo effec- tively respond to the economic changes which have occurred during the last 30 years. This report is a companion volume to “Industrial Policy: Japan’s Flexible Ap- proach” (GAO/ID-82-32). QAO/ID-83-11 ’ OCTOBER X41982 UNITEO STATES GENERAL ACC~UN-~INGOFFICE WASH1NGTON, D.C. 20548 INTRINATIONAL DlVlSION B-209015 The Honorable Henry Reuss Chairman, Joint Economic Committee Congress of the United States Dear. Mr. Chairman: This report is a companion volume to our June 23, 1982, report "Industrial Policy: Japan's Flexible Approach" (GAO/ID-82-32) and contains case studies which explain in detail the assistance provided by the Japanese Govern- ment to five key industries. As you requested, our case studies include three high technology growth industries-- computers, aircraft and robotics --and two industries faced with unfavorable world market prospects--shipbuilding and textiles. Japan in the postwar period adopted economic policies that fostered economic growth. These policies were imple- mented with a mix of macro-level monetary and fiscal policies and micro-level industrial policies. Monetary and fiscal policies promoted investment by keeping interest rates low and holding government spending to a consistent share of na- tional income.
  • Computer Architectures an Overview

    Computer Architectures an Overview

    Computer Architectures An Overview PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 22:35:32 UTC Contents Articles Microarchitecture 1 x86 7 PowerPC 23 IBM POWER 33 MIPS architecture 39 SPARC 57 ARM architecture 65 DEC Alpha 80 AlphaStation 92 AlphaServer 95 Very long instruction word 103 Instruction-level parallelism 107 Explicitly parallel instruction computing 108 References Article Sources and Contributors 111 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 113 Article Licenses License 114 Microarchitecture 1 Microarchitecture In computer engineering, microarchitecture (sometimes abbreviated to µarch or uarch), also called computer organization, is the way a given instruction set architecture (ISA) is implemented on a processor. A given ISA may be implemented with different microarchitectures.[1] Implementations might vary due to different goals of a given design or due to shifts in technology.[2] Computer architecture is the combination of microarchitecture and instruction set design. Relation to instruction set architecture The ISA is roughly the same as the programming model of a processor as seen by an assembly language programmer or compiler writer. The ISA includes the execution model, processor registers, address and data formats among other things. The Intel Core microarchitecture microarchitecture includes the constituent parts of the processor and how these interconnect and interoperate to implement the ISA. The microarchitecture of a machine is usually represented as (more or less detailed) diagrams that describe the interconnections of the various microarchitectural elements of the machine, which may be everything from single gates and registers, to complete arithmetic logic units (ALU)s and even larger elements.
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C

    UNITED STATES SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C

    Table of Contents As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 2, 2011 Registration No. 333- UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM S-1 REGISTRATION STATEMENT Under The Securities Act of 1933 Guidewire Software, Inc. (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 7372 36-4468504 (State or other jurisdiction of (Primary Standard Industrial (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Classification Code Number) Identification Number) 2211 Bridgepointe Parkway San Mateo, CA 94404 Tel: (650) 357-9100 (Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of Registrant’s principal executive offices) Marcus S. Ryu President and Chief Executive Officer 2211 Bridgepointe Parkway San Mateo, CA 94404 Tel: (650) 357-9100 (Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service) Copies to: Craig M. Schmitz Robert F. Donohue Jeffrey D. Saper Richard A. Kline Vice President and General Counsel Robert G. Day Goodwin Procter LLP Guidewire Software, Inc. Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C. 135 Commonwealth Drive 2211 Bridgepointe Parkway 650 Page Mill Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 San Mateo, CA 94404 Palo Alto, CA 94304 Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after this registration statement becomes effective. If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933 check the following box: ☐ If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.
  • FUJITSU LIMITED Annual Report 2003 Consolidated Financial Highlights 1

    FUJITSU LIMITED Annual Report 2003 Consolidated Financial Highlights 1

    FUJITSU LIMITED Annual Report 2003 FUJITSU LIMITED Annual Report 2003 Consolidated Financial Highlights 1 To Our Shareholders 2 At a Glance 8 Customer Solution Profiles 10 Software and Services 14 Platforms 16 Electronic Devices 18 Research & Development 19 Environmental Activities / Community Support 20 Management 22 Five-Year Summary 24 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Operations 25 Consolidated Balance Sheets 30 Consolidated Statements of Operations 32 Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity 33 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 34 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 35 Independent Auditors' Report 52 Principal Subsidiaries and Affiliates 53 Cautionary Statement This annual report may contain forward-looking statements that are based on management's current views and assumptions and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results, performance or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in such statements. Words such as "anticipates," "believes," "expects," "estimates," "intends," "plans," "projects," and similar expressions which indicate future events and trends identify forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from those projected or implied in the forward-looking statements due to, without limitation, the following factors: general economic and market conditions in the major geographic markets for Fujitsu's services and products, which are the United States, EU, Japan and elsewhere in Asia, particularly as such conditions may effect