DOCSLIB.ORG

Molo Feasibility Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

MOLO FEASIBILITY STUDY National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report On the Molo Graphite Project located near the village of Fotadrevo in the Province of Toliara, Madagascar Prepared by DRA Projects (Pty) Limited for ENERGIZER RESOURCES INC. Qualified persons: Dr. John Hancox PhD. Geology Pri.Sc.Nat Mr. Desmond Subramani B.Sc. Honours Geology Pri.Sc.Nat Mr. Dave Thompson B.Tech Mining Pr.Cert.Eng Mr. Oliver Peters M.Sc. Mineral Processing Pr.Eng Mr. Doug Heher B.Sc. Mechanical Engineering Pr.Eng Mr. John Stanbury B.Sc. Industrial Engineering Pr.Eng Effective Date: 6 February 2015 Energizer Resources Inc. Molo Feasibility Study Reference: C8375-TRPT-001 Rev 6 Page 2 of 373 IMPORTANT NOTICE This notice is an integral component of the Molo 2015 Feasibility Study (“Molo 2015 FS”) technical report and should be read in its entirety and must accompany every copy made of the Molo 2015 FS. The Molo 2015 FS has been prepared using the Canadian National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43 101”). The Molo 2015 FS has been prepared for Energizer Resources Inc. (“Energizer”) by Caracle Creek International, GCS Water and Environment(“GCS”), Agetipa SRK Consulting Inc (“SRK”), Metpro Management Inc., and DRA Projects (Pty) Ltd (“DRA”) as the Report Contributors. The Molo 2015 FS is based on information and data supplied to the Report Contributors by Energizer and other parties. The quality of information, conclusions, and estimates contained herein are consistent with the level of effort involved in the services of the Report Contributors, based on: (i) Information available at the time of preparation. (ii) Data supplied by outside sources, and (iii) The assumptions, conditions, and qualifications set forth in this report. Each portion of the report is intended for use by Energizer subject to the terms and conditions of its contract with the Report Contributors. Except for the purposes legislated under Canadian provincial and territorial securities law, any other uses of the report, by any third party, is at that party’s sole risk. Recognising that Energizer has legal and regulatory obligations, the Report Contributors have consented to the filing of the Molo 2015 FS with Canadian Securities Administrators and its System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (“SEDAR”). The results of the Molo 2015 FS represent forward-looking information. The forward-looking information includes metal price assumptions, cash flow forecasts, projected capital and operating costs, metal recoveries, mine life and production rates, and other assumptions used in the Molo 2015 FS. Readers are cautioned that actual results may vary from those presented. The factors and assumptions used to develop the forward-looking information, and the risks that could cause the actual results to differ materially are presented in the body of this report under each relevant section. The conclusions and estimates stated in the Molo 2015 FS are to the accuracy stated in the Molo 2015 FS only and rely on assumptions stated in the Molo 2015 FS. The results of further work may indicate that the conclusions, estimates, and assumptions in the Molo 2015 FS need to be revised or reviewed. The Report Contributors have used their experience and industry expertise to produce the estimates and approximations in the Molo 2015 FS. Where the Report Contributors have made those estimates and approximations, they are subject to qualifications and assumptions and it should also be noted that all estimates and approximations contained in the Molo 2015 FS will be prone to fluctuations with time and changing industry circumstances. The Molo 2015 FS should be construed in light of the methods, procedures, and techniques used to prepare the Molo 2015 FS. Sections or parts of the Molo 2015 FS should not be read in isolation of, or removed from their original context. Energizer Resources Inc. Molo Feasibility Study Reference: C8375-TRPT-001 Rev 6 Page 3 of 373 Date and Signature Page This report titled “Molo Feasibility Study - National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report” was prepared on behalf of Energizer Resources Inc. by the following authors: Effective date: 6 February 2015 John Hancox, PhD (Geology), General Manager - Africa and Australasia, Caracle Creek International Consulting (Pty) Limited, was responsible for: Sections 1.5, 1.7, 1.18.1, 1.19.1, Section 4, Section 5, Section 6, Section 7, Section 8, Section 9, Section 10, Section 11, Sections 25.1, 26.1, 27.1.Signed 23 March 2015. Desmond Subramani, B.Sc. Honours (Geology), Principal Geologist – Mineral Resource Estimation, Caracle Creek International Consulting (Pty) Limited, was responsible for: Section 1.6, Section 12, Section 14. Signed 23 March 2015. Dave Thompson, B.Tech (Mining), Mining Consultant, DRA Projects (Pty) Ltd, was responsible for: Sections 1.8, 1.18.2, 1.19.2, Section 15, Section 16, Sections 25.2, 26.2, 27.2. Signed 23 March 2015. Oliver Peters, M.Sc. (Mineral Processing), Process Consultant, Metpro Management Inc., was responsible for: Sections 1.9, 1.18.3, 1.19.3, Section 13, Sections 25.3, 26.3, 27.3. Signed 23 March 2015. Energizer Resources Inc. Molo Feasibility Study Reference: C8375-TRPT-001 Rev 6 Page 4 of 373 Doug Heher, B.Eng (Mechanical), Project Manager, DRA Projects (Pty) Ltd, was responsible for: Sections 1.1 to 1.3, 1.10,1.11,1.13 to 1.15,1.17, 1.18.4 to 1.18.10,1.19.4 to 1.19.9, Section 2, Section 3, Section 17, Section 18, Section 20, Section 21, Section 23, Section 24, Section 25.4 to 25.9, 25.11, Section 26,4 to 26.9, Section 27.4 to 27.5. Signed 23 March 2015. John Stanbury, B.Sc. (Industrial Engineering), Director, Cresco Project Finance, was responsible for: Sections 1.4, 1.12, 1.16, Section 19, Section 22, Section 25.10. Signed 23 March 2015. Energizer Resources Inc. Molo Feasibility Study Reference: C8375-TRPT-001 Rev 6 Page 5 of 373 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 28 1.1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................28 1.2 Project Location .......................................................................................................................29 1.3 Project Description ..................................................................................................................29 1.4 Summary of financial results ...................................................................................................31 1.5 Property Description and Ownership ......................................................................................32 1.5.1 Property description ................................................................................................................32 1.5.2 Ownership ...............................................................................................................................32 1.5.3 Royalties ..................................................................................................................................33 1.5.4 Permits ....................................................................................................................................33 1.6 Mineral Resource Estimate .....................................................................................................34 1.7 Exploration ..............................................................................................................................37 1.8 Mineral Reserve Estimate .......................................................................................................37 1.9 Metallurgical Test Work ...........................................................................................................37 1.10 Recovery methods ..................................................................................................................39 1.11 Infrastructure ...........................................................................................................................43 1.11.1 Raw Water Supply ...................................................................................................................43 1.11.2 Power Supply ..........................................................................................................................43 1.12 Product Pricing ........................................................................................................................44 1.13 Logistics...................................................................................................................................44 1.14 Capital costs ............................................................................................................................47 1.15 Operating costs .......................................................................................................................48 1.16 Economic analysis ...................................................................................................................49 1.17 Environmental & Permitting .....................................................................................................50 1.18 Conclusions .............................................................................................................................50 1.18.1 Geology ...................................................................................................................................50
Recommended publications
  • Ecosystem Profile Madagascar and Indian

    Ecosystem Profile Madagascar and Indian

    ECOSYSTEM PROFILE MADAGASCAR AND INDIAN OCEAN ISLANDS FINAL VERSION DECEMBER 2014 This version of the Ecosystem Profile, based on the draft approved by the Donor Council of CEPF was finalized in December 2014 to include clearer maps and correct minor errors in Chapter 12 and Annexes Page i Prepared by: Conservation International - Madagascar Under the supervision of: Pierre Carret (CEPF) With technical support from: Moore Center for Science and Oceans - Conservation International Missouri Botanical Garden And support from the Regional Advisory Committee Léon Rajaobelina, Conservation International - Madagascar Richard Hughes, WWF – Western Indian Ocean Edmond Roger, Université d‘Antananarivo, Département de Biologie et Ecologie Végétales Christopher Holmes, WCS – Wildlife Conservation Society Steve Goodman, Vahatra Will Turner, Moore Center for Science and Oceans, Conservation International Ali Mohamed Soilihi, Point focal du FEM, Comores Xavier Luc Duval, Point focal du FEM, Maurice Maurice Loustau-Lalanne, Point focal du FEM, Seychelles Edmée Ralalaharisoa, Point focal du FEM, Madagascar Vikash Tatayah, Mauritian Wildlife Foundation Nirmal Jivan Shah, Nature Seychelles Andry Ralamboson Andriamanga, Alliance Voahary Gasy Idaroussi Hamadi, CNDD- Comores Luc Gigord - Conservatoire botanique du Mascarin, Réunion Claude-Anne Gauthier, Muséum National d‘Histoire Naturelle, Paris Jean-Paul Gaudechoux, Commission de l‘Océan Indien Drafted by the Ecosystem Profiling Team: Pierre Carret (CEPF) Harison Rabarison, Nirhy Rabibisoa, Setra Andriamanaitra,
  • Rep 2 out Public 2010 S Tlet Sur of Ma Urvey Rvey Adagas Repor Scar Rt

    Rep 2 out Public 2010 S Tlet Sur of Ma Urvey Rvey Adagas Repor Scar Rt

    Evidence for Malaria Medicines Policy Outlet Survey Republic of Madagascar 2010 Survey Report MINSTERE DE LA SANTE PUBLIQUE www. ACTwatch.info Copyright © 2010 Population Services International (PSI). All rights reserved. Acknowledgements ACTwatch is funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. This study was implemented by Population Services International (PSI). ACTwatch’s Advisory Committee: Mr. Suprotik Basu Advisor to the UN Secretary General's Special Envoy for Malaria Mr. Rik Bosman Supply Chain Expert, Former Senior Vice President, Unilever Ms. Renia Coghlan Global Access Associate Director, Medicines for Malaria Venture (MMV) Dr. Thom Eisele Assistant Professor, Tulane University Mr. Louis Da Gama Malaria Advocacy & Communications Director, Global Health Advocates Dr. Paul Lavani Executive Director, RaPID Pharmacovigilance Program Dr. Ramanan Senior Fellow, Resources for the Future Dr. Matthew Lynch Project Director, VOICES, Johns Hopkins University Centre for Dr. Bernard Nahlen Deputy Coordinator, President's Malaria Initiative (PMI) Dr. Jayesh M. Pandit Head, Pharmacovigilance Department, Pharmacy and Poisons Board‐Kenya Dr. Melanie Renshaw Advisor to the UN Secretary General's Special Envoy for Malaria Mr. Oliver Sabot Vice‐President, Vaccines Clinton Foundation Ms. Rima Shretta Senior Program Associate, Strengthening Pharmaceutical Systems Dr. Rick Steketee Science Director, Malaria Control and Evaluation Partnership in Africa Dr. Warren Stevens Health Economist Dr. Gladys Tetteh CDC Resident Advisor, President’s Malaria
  • Agriculture Et Elevage Traditionnels Dans La Region De Toliara

    Agriculture Et Elevage Traditionnels Dans La Region De Toliara

    MINISTERE DE L’EDUCATION NATIONALE ET DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE ---------------------------- UNIVERSITE DE TOLIARA FACULTE DES LETTRES ET DES SCIENCES HUMAINES --------------------------------- PROJET DE DEVELOPPEMENT D’ELEVAGE DANS LE SUD-OUEST ------------------------------------------------------ CONVENTION N° 03/04/ DELSO/ FACULTE DES LETTRES ET DES SCIENCES HUMAINES _________________________________________ AGRICULTURE ET ELEVAGE TRADITIONNELS DANS LA REGION DE TOLIARA Mémoire D.E.A. présenté par ANFANI Hamada Bacar Option : Géographie Sous la direction de Monsieur NAPETOKE Marcel Maître de Conférences à l’Université de Toliara Date de soutenance : 13 Septembre 2005 Année universitaire 2004 - 2005 REMERCIEMENTS Ce travail a pu être réalisé grâce aux conseils et aux aides matérielles, morales et financières de différentes personnes que nous devrons remercier ici. Nos remerciements et notre profonde reconnaissance vont tout d’abord à : - Monsieur NAPETOKE Marcel, Maître de Conférences à l’Université de Tuléar qui a accepté de nous diriger dans ce travail, - Monsieur JAOFETRA Tsimihato qui n’a jamais cessé de nous donner des conseils et de nous remonter le moral, - Monsieur RAZAFINDRAKOTO Marc Joseph, Doyen de la Faculté des Lettres et des Sciences Humaines qui nous a permis de réaliser ce travail dans un plus bref délai, Tous les enseignants qui ont assuré notre formation de Géographie depuis notre première année Universitaire, - Tous les Responsables du Projet « DELSO » qui nous ont accordé une aide financière et logistique au cours de la réalisation de ce mémoire. Nos remerciements vont aussi à : - toute notre famille qui, malgré sa pauvreté, s’est sacrifiée pour faire de nous ce que nous sommes, - toute la famille DEZA Jean Marie, qui m’a toujours aidé pendant les moments les plus difficiles, - Madame RAZANAJAFY Jeanne (NAKE) qui a toujours su patienter et supporter ma vie estudiantine et qui a déployé tous ses efforts pour que ce travail soit une réussite.
  • The South West Madagascar Tortoise Survey Project End of Phase 2 Preliminary Report to Donors and Supporters

    The South West Madagascar Tortoise Survey Project End of Phase 2 Preliminary Report to Donors and Supporters

    The South West Madagascar Tortoise Survey Project End of Phase 2 Preliminary Report to Donors and Supporters Southern Madagascar Tortoise Conservation Project Preliminary Donor Report –RCJ Walker 2010 The species documented within this report have suffered considerably at the hands of commercial reptile collectors in recent years. Due to the sensitive nature of some information detailing the precise locations of populations of tortoises contained within this report, the author asks that any public dissemination, of the locations of these rare animals be done with discretion. Cover photo: Pyxis arachnoides arachnoides; all photographs by Ryan Walker and Brain Horne Summary • This summary report documents phase two of the South West Madagascar Tortoise Survey Project (formally the Madagascar Spider Tortoise Conservation and Science Project). The project has redirected focus during this second phase, to concentrate research and survey effort for both of southern Madagascar’s threatened tortoise species; Pyxis arachnoides and Astrocheys radiata. • The aims and objectives of this three phase project, were developed during the 2008 Madagascar Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle IUCN/SSC Red Listing and Conservation Planning Meeting held in Antananarivo, Madagascar. • This project now has five research objectives: o Establish the population density and current range of the remaining populations of P. arachnoides and radiated tortoise A. radiata. o Assess the response of the spider tortoises to anthropogenic habitat disturbance and alteration. o Assess the extent of global internet based trade in Madagascar’s four endemic, Critically Endangered tortoise species. o Assess the poaching pressure placed on radiated tortoises for the local tortoise meat trade. o Carry out genetic analysis on the three subspecies of spider tortoise and confirm that they are indeed three subspecies and at what geographical point one sub species population changes into another.
  • Species Selected by the CITES Plants Committee Following Cop14

    Species Selected by the CITES Plants Committee Following Cop14

    PC19 Doc. 12.3 Annex 3 Review of Significant Trade: Species selected by the CITES Plants Committee following CoP14 CITES Project No. S-346 Prepared for the CITES Secretariat by United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre PC19 Doc. 12.3 UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road Cambridge CB3 0DL United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0) 1223 277314 Fax: +44 (0) 1223 277136 Email: [email protected] Website: www.unep-wcmc.org ABOUT UNEP-WORLD CONSERVATION CITATION MONITORING CENTRE UNEP-WCMC (2010). Review of Significant Trade: The UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Species selected by the CITES Plants Committee Centre (UNEP-WCMC), based in Cambridge, following CoP14. UK, is the specialist biodiversity information and assessment centre of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), run PREPARED FOR cooperatively with WCMC, a UK charity. The CITES Secretariat, Geneva, Switzerland. Centre's mission is to evaluate and highlight the many values of biodiversity and put authoritative biodiversity knowledge at the DISCLAIMER centre of decision-making. Through the analysis The contents of this report do not necessarily and synthesis of global biodiversity knowledge reflect the views or policies of UNEP or the Centre provides authoritative, strategic and contributory organisations. The designations timely information for conventions, countries employed and the presentations do not imply and organisations to use in the development and the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on implementation of their policies and decisions. the part of UNEP or contributory organisations The UNEP-WCMC provides objective and concerning the legal status of any country, scientifically rigorous procedures and services. territory, city or area or its authority, or These include ecosystem assessments, support concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or for the implementation of environmental boundaries.
  • Expanded PDF Profile

    Expanded PDF Profile

    Profile Year: 2001 People and Language Detail Report Language Name: Malagasy, Masikoro ISO Language Code: msh The Masikoro of Madagascar The name Masikoro [mASikUr] was first used to indicate all the different clans subdued by a prominent dynasty, the Andrevola, during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, just south of the Onilahy river to the Fiherenana river. The name later became restricted to those living between the Onilahy and the Mangoky rivers. Some use the name Masikoro to distinguish the people of the interior from the Vezo on the coast, but the Masikoro themselves, when prompted, strongly distance themselves from the Vezo in terms of custom, language and behavior. Closer to the Masikoro than the Vezo are the Tañalaña (South) and the Bara (towards the North and East). In literature the Masikoro are often counted among the southern Sakalava with whom many similarities can be drawn. Masikoro land is a region of difficult access, often experiencing drought. The people are agro-pastoral. A diversity of agricultural activities are practiced (rice, beans, cotton, maize, manioc) and cattle raising is very important (more than two heads of cattle per inhabitant). Recently rampant cattle-rustling is causing many Masikoro to reduce their cattle herds. They are hard-working and these days have very little leisure time. The Masikoro are a proud people, characteristically rural. Ancestral traditions are held high among them as is correct language use for specific situations, which automatically grades the speaker as one who shows respect or who does not. It is Primary Religion: a dishonor for them to be dirty and they can be recognized by the way they dress.
  • Evaluation Des Impacts Du Cyclone Haruna Sur Les Moyens De Subsistance

    Evaluation Des Impacts Du Cyclone Haruna Sur Les Moyens De Subsistance

    1 EVALUATION DES IMPACTS DU CYCLONE HARUNA SUR LES MOYENS DE SUBSISTANCE, ET SUR LA SECURITE ALIMENTAIRE ET LA VULNERABILITE DES POPULATONS AFFECTEES commune rurale de Sokobory, Tuléar Tuléar I Photo crédit : ACF Cluster Sécurité Alimentaire et Moyens de Subsistance Avril 2013 2 TABLE DES MATIERES LISTE DES CARTES..................................................................................................................................... 3 LISTE DES GRAPHIQUES ..................................................................................................................................... 3 LISTE DES TABLEAUX ........................................................................................................................................... 4 ACRONYMES ............................................................................................................................................................ 5 RESUME ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 1. CONTEXTE ............................................................................................................................................ 8 2. OBJECTIFS ET METHODES ............................................................................................................. 11 2.1 OBJECTIFS ........................................................................................................................................... 11 2.2 METHODOLOGIE
  • Chapter 9 Fishes

    Chapter 9 Fishes

    Chapter 9 Fishes Introduction to the Freshwater Fishes J. S. Sparks and M. L. J. .Stiassny Alrhough many of Madagascar's rcrrestrial vertebrares have knowledge persist. Finally, in the face of the current rate of been studied in great decail, parricularly the lemurs, very aquatic habitat degradation in M·adagascar, we present our little up-to-date information is availa ble for the highly vicw of the future of the island's freshwater ichthyofauna. threatened freshwater fishes native to the island. This intro­ In many ways Madagascar possesses a typical island duction provides a summary of Madagascar's native fresh­ ichthyofauna, but it is also one that differs in certain re­ water fishes and an update on the current state of knowl­ spects because of its continemal (Gondwanan) origin. Like edgc regarding the origins, composition, biogeography, those of many true oceanic islands, Madagascar's na­ and relationships of this ali but neglected vertebratc buna. tive ichthyofauna is relatively depauperate at broad taxo­ We do not attempt a summary of the hydrology, limnology, nomie levels when compared with those of much larger, or conservation status of Madagascar's aquaric resources geogmphically more diverse continentallandmasses (table here, as these have bcen presented in detail elsewhere 9.1). However, bascd on the revised totals presented herein (e.g., Battistini and Richard-Vindard 1972; Chaperon et al. and considering the surface arca of the island, the notion of 1993; Riseng 1997; Wright 1997; Benstead et al. 2000). a depauperate ichthyofauna at the species leve! for Mada­ Herein wc focus on patterns of fish diversity and distribu­ gascar is no longer tenable (e.g., Kiener 1963; Kiener and tion and the historical geological events that have shaped Richard-Vindard 1972; Jenkins 1987).
  • Gem Corundum Deposits of Madagascar: a Review

    Gem Corundum Deposits of Madagascar: a Review

    Ore Geology Reviews 34 (2008) 134–154 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Ore Geology Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/oregeorev Gem corundum deposits of Madagascar: A review Amos Fety Michel Rakotondrazafy a, Gaston Giuliani b,c,⁎, Daniel Ohnenstetter c, Anthony E. Fallick d, Saholy Rakotosamizanany a, Alfred Andriamamonjy a, Théogène Ralantoarison a, Madison Razanatseheno a, Yohann Offant e, Virginie Garnier b, Henri Maluski f, Christian Dunaigre g, Dietmar Schwarz g, Voahangy Ratrimo a a Faculté des Sciences, Département des Sciences de La Terre, Université d'Antananarivo, Ambohitsaina, BP 906, Antananarivo 101, Madagascar b Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, DME, UR154 LMTG, Toulouse, France c Centre de Recherches Pétrographiques et Géochimiques/Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, BP 20, 54501- Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France d Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre, East Kilbride, Rankine Avenue, Glasgow G75 0QF, Scotland, UK e Cerege, Europole Méditerranéen de l'Arbois, BP 80, 13545- Aix-en-Provence, France f Laboratoire de Géochronologie, Université de Montpellier 2, Place Eugène Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier, France g Gübelin Gemmological Laboratory, Maihofstrasse, 102, CH-6000 Lucerne 9, Switzerland ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: Madagascar is one of the most important gem-producing countries in the world, including ruby and Received 2 March 2006 sapphires. Gem corundum deposits formed at different stages in the geological evolution of the island and in Accepted 24 May 2007 contrasting environments. Four main settings are identified: (1) Gem corundum formed in the Precambrian Available online 18 April 2008 basement within the Neoproterozoic terranes of southern Madagascar, and in the volcano-sedimentary series of Beforona, north of Antananarivo.
  • Liste Candidatures Maires Atsimo Andrefana

    Liste Candidatures Maires Atsimo Andrefana

    NOMBRE DISTRICT COMMUNE ENTITE NOM ET PRENOM(S) CANDIDATS CANDIDATS ISIKA REHETRA MIARAKA @ ANDRY RAJOELINA AMPANIHY OUEST AMBOROPOTSY 1 VAKISOA (ISIKA REHETRA MIARAKA @ ANDRY RAJOELINA) AMPANIHY OUEST AMBOROPOTSY 1 INDEPENDANT SOLO (INDEPENDANT SOLO) BESADA AMPANIHY OUEST AMBOROPOTSY 1 AVI (ASA VITA NO IFAMPITSARANA) TOVONDRAOKE AMPANIHY OUEST AMBOROPOTSY 1 TIM (TIAKO I MADAGASIKARA) REMAMORITSY AMPANIHY OUEST AMBOROPOTSY 1 HIARAKA ISIKA (HIARAKA ISIKA) SORODO INDEPENDANT MOSA Jean Baptiste (INDEPENDANT AMPANIHY OUEST AMPANIHY CENTRE 1 FOTOTSANAKE MOSA Jean Baptiste) ISIKA REHETRA MIARAKA @ ANDRY RAJOELINA AMPANIHY OUEST AMPANIHY CENTRE 1 TOVONASY (ISIKA REHETRA MIARAKA @ ANDRY RAJOELINA) ISIKA REHETRA MIARAKA @ ANDRY RAJOELINA AMPANIHY OUEST ANDROKA 1 ESOLONDRAY Raymond (ISIKA REHETRA MIARAKA @ ANDRY RAJOELINA) AMPANIHY OUEST ANDROKA 1 TIM (TIAKO I MADAGASIKARA) LAHIVANOSON Jacques AMPANIHY OUEST ANDROKA 1 MMM (MALAGASY MIARA MIAINGA) KOLOAVISOA René INDEPENDANT TSY MIHAMBO RIE (INDEPENDANT AMPANIHY OUEST ANDROKA 1 EMANINTSINDRAZA TSY MIHAMBO RIE) INDEPENDANT ESOATEHY Victor (INDEPENDANT AMPANIHY OUEST ANDROKA 1 EFANOMBO ESOATEHY Victor) ISIKA REHETRA MIARAKA @ ANDRY RAJOELINA AMPANIHY OUEST ANKILIABO 1 ZOENDRAZA Fanilina (ISIKA REHETRA MIARAKA @ ANDRY RAJOELINA) INDEPENDANT TAHIENANDRO (INDEPENDANT AMPANIHY OUEST ANKILIABO 1 EMAZINY Mana TAHIENANDRO) AMPANIHY OUEST ANKILIABO 1 TIM (TIAKO I MADAGASIKARA) RASOBY AMPANIHY OUEST ANKILIABO 1 HIARAKA ISIKA (HIARAKA ISIKA) MAHATALAKE ISIKA REHETRA MIARAKA @ ANDRY RAJOELINA AMPANIHY OUEST
  • MALAGASY MINERALS LIMITED Activities Report for the September Quarter 2015

    MALAGASY MINERALS LIMITED Activities Report for the September Quarter 2015

    30th October 2015 ASX Announcement ASX:MGY MALAGASY MINERALS LIMITED Activities Report for the September Quarter 2015 HIGHLIGHTS Subsequent to the end of the September quarter Malagasy Minerals announced (ASX announcement dated 26th October 2015) that it had executed a Heads of Agreement (HOA) with Greenmount Resources Pty Ltd (“Greenmount”) to acquire all of the issued capital of Greenmount. Greenmount is an unlisted private company which has contracted to acquire the Karlawinda Gold Project encompassing the Bibra Gold Deposit and the highly endowed Francopan Gold Prospect. These advanced positions are located in a large exploration holding that is considered to have excellent regional gold potential. Greenmount has paid the first installment to acquire Karlawinda and is required to pay a further installment of $1.5m in August 2016. A trenching and sampling program has commenced at the Razafy target at the 100% owned Maniry Graphite Project. Results from this work will be used to estimate an initial resource. KARLAWINDA PROJECT DETAILS Summary Bibra Deposit - JORC 2012 Inferred resource at: 18mt @ 1.1g/t Au for 650,800oz Au (COG 0.5g/t) Potential for near term open pit production: approximately $12 million already spent on resource evaluation and pre-feasibility study activities. Thick, flat lying gold mineralized structure amenable to low cost open pit mining with mineralization starting close to surface. No previous mining. Located close to key infrastructure and mining support services. Large scale potential within an unexplored Archean greenstone belt to significantly add to the resource base in the near term: . Bibra Gold Deposit: gold mineralization remains open in down plunge positions and potential exists for strike extensions and stacked mineralized gold lodes.
  • THE STATUS and DISTRIBUTION of Freshwater Biodiversity in Madagascar and the Indian Ocean Islands Hotspot

    THE STATUS and DISTRIBUTION of Freshwater Biodiversity in Madagascar and the Indian Ocean Islands Hotspot

    THE THE STATUs aNd dISTRIBUtION OF STAT U Freshwater biodIversIty in MadagasCar s a N aNd the INdIaN OCeaN IslaNds hOtspOt d d I STR Edited by Laura Máiz-Tomé, Catherine Sayer and William Darwall IUCN Freshwater Biodiversity Unit, Global Species Programme IBU t ION OF F OF ION RESHWATER N ds a BIO I N d I ar ar VERS d C N I TY IN IN sla Madagas I N C ar a ar N ea d the I the d d the I the d C N N d Madagas a O I a N O C ea N I sla N IUCN h ds Rue Mauverney 28 CH-1196 Gland O Switzerland tsp Tel: + 41 22 999 0000 Fax: + 41 22 999 0015 O www.iucn.org/redlist t the IUCN red list of threatened speciestM www.iucnredlist.org THE STATUS AND DISTRIBUTION OF freshwater biodiversity in Madagascar and the Indian Ocean islands hotspot Edited by Laura Máiz-Tomé, Catherine Sayer and William Darwall IUCN Freshwater Biodiversity Unit, Global Species Programme The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN, or other participating organisations. This publication has been made possible by funding from The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund. Published by: IUCN Cambridge, UK in collaboration with IUCN Gland, Switzerland Copyright: © 2018 IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorised without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged.