DOCSLIB.ORG

Pattullo Bridge Replacement Project Public Consultation Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pattullo Bridge Replacement Project Public Consultation Report PATTULLO BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT PUBLIC CONSULTATION REPORT: APPLICATION REVIEW December 2018 Pattullo Bridge Replacement Project Environmental Assessment Public Consultation Report 1 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Project Background ............................................................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Consultation and Engagement Objectives .......................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Purpose of this Report ........................................................................................................................................ 4 2. Public Consultation to Date .................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Summary of Public Consultation ......................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach ............................................................................................................. 5 3. Public Comment Period .......................................................................................................... 5 3.1 Duration .............................................................................................................................................................. 5 3.2 Number of Submissions ...................................................................................................................................... 5 3.3 Summary of Public Issues and Concerns Raised ................................................................................................. 5 4. Notification ............................................................................................................................ 6 4.1 Newspaper Advertisement ................................................................................................................................. 6 4.2 Stakeholder Email ............................................................................................................................................... 6 4.3 Earned Media ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 5. Public Open Houses ............................................................................................................... 7 5.1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................................... 7 5.2 Format ................................................................................................................................................................. 7 5.3 Display Materials ................................................................................................................................................. 7 Appendix A – Public Comments and Responses Tracking Table Appendix B – Newspaper Advertisement Appendix C – Stakeholder Email Appendix D – Public Information Session Display Boards Pattullo Bridge Replacement Project Environmental Assessment Public Consultation Report 2 1. Introduction 1.1 Project Background Strategically located between the Port Mann and Alex Fraser/Queensborough bridges, the Pattullo Bridge provides a direct connection between New Westminster and Surrey, across the Fraser River. The central location of the bridge makes it a vital link in the regional transportation network for people, goods and services. Openede in 1937, th 80‐year‐old structure does not meet modern design standards and would be at risk in the event of a moderate earthquake or ship collision. Its piers are at risk of being undermined by river scour and many bridge components have surpassed their useful lives. Existing sidewalks, barriers, and connections for pedestrians and cyclists do not provide the level of protection from traffic that a newer facility would provide. A regular maintenance program has extended the existing bridge’s lifespan but escalating efforts to prolong its use are no longer cost effective. An assessment of maintenance needs has revealed that upgrading the existing bridge to meet modern safety standards would be extremely challenging, both technically and financially. Replacing the existing bridge is essential for maintaining a critical river crossing for both people and goods between the cities of New Westminster and Surrey. The new four‐lane Pattullo Bridge will provide important improvements for everyone using the bridge, including people who are driving, cycling or walking, as well as communities on either side of the bridge: a safer crossing for all bridge users with modern, wider lanes separated by a centre median barrier; dedicated walking and cycling lanes, separated from traffic by a median on both sides of the bridge; better connections to, from and near the bridge. The British Columbia Environmental Assessment Office (BCEAO) and the Vancouver Fraser Port Authority have agreed to a coordinated provincial‐federal environmental assessment process for the proposed project, with the Environmental Assessment Office as the lead agency. The harmonized environmental assessment process will incorporate the port authority’s federal requirements to meet both the Province and the port authority’s respective assessment processes. At the conclusion of the harmonized environmental assessment process, the port authority will make a determination under section 67 of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012 of whether the project is likely to result in significant adverse environmental effects. The proposed project is required to obtain a Project and Environmental Review project permit from the port authority to proceed and is categorized as a Category D project. Planning and engagement for the Project has been underway since 2012. During this time, work was undertaken to raise awareness of the Project, receive feedback from stakeholders and interested parties, and respond to Project‐ related enquiries. 1.2 Consultation and Engagement Objectives In June 2018, the Proponent submitted a Public Consultation Plan to the BCEAO that described a Communications and Engagement Program for the Proposed Project as it progresses through the harmonized environmental assessment process. The consultation program was designed to address the following objectives: 1. Inform community, stakeholders and the public about the project and opportunities to provide input. Build public awareness of the Project by providing timely and relevant information about the Project and the environmental and regulatory review process and opportunities for the public and stakeholders to provide input. Pattullo Bridge Replacement Project Environmental Assessment Public Consultation Report 3 2. Gather community, stakeholder and public input, both within and in addition to the EA process. Gather input regarding the interests and concerns of the public and stakeholders related to the Project, including the environmental, economic, heritage, health and social conditions in the Project area and potential effects to those conditions and proposed mitigation measures. 3. Report community, stakeholder and public input. Report out on the results of feedback and input received during consultation rounds. Consultation summary reports will be posted online. 4. Consider community, stakeholder and public input. Refine elements of the Project or develop proposed mitigation measures to address input where possible, subject to technical and financial constraints. 5. Meet regulator’s public consultation requirements for the harmonized EA. This includes two public comment periods, tracking public input, and communicating to the public how public comments will be addressed in the EA. MOTI’s project website will provide information about the EA throughout the EA review process and will direct interested members of the public to the EAO’s website to provide comments during the public comment periods. In accordance with the EAO’s requirements, MOTI will maintain a tracking table to respond to each individual public comment provided during a public comment period in each stage of the EA. Part D, Section 13 of the Environmental Assessment Certificate (EAC) Application included a summary of public consultations to date and the consultation proposed for the Application Review period. Consultation Summary Reports can be viewed in Appendix 18.19 – Public Consultation Support Documents. 1.3 Purpose of this Report The purpose of this document is to report on the results of public consultation activities in accordance with the Section 11 Procedural Order. An overview of public consultation to date, including stakeholder engagement and outreach is presented in Section 2. This report also provides a summary of the Application Review public comment period, including notification and public information sessions. Key themes of public views, issues and concerns from the Application Review phase are presented in Section 3.3, and detailed responses to individual public comments are presented in Appendix A. 2. Public Consultation to Date Planning and engagement for the Project has been underway since 2012, including multiple rounds of formal public consultation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transportation
    OCTOBER 2009 SITELINESLandscape Architecture in British Columbia TransporTaTion Canada Line Opening | Road Rights of Way Receives ASLA Award | Vancouver Green Streets | Multi-modal Pathway Design 2009Ad_Habitat_Evos:Layout 1 9/30/09 4:42 PM Page 1 Inspired Artistic Gyroscopic EvosTM is the unique playsystem where imagination rules and feet never need to touch the ground. Its artistic, Exclusive BC Representative spherical design and play components create a fresh shape in play that’s positively “gyroscopic.” With Evos, kids build agility and confidence as they balance and counterbalance their bodies against the forces of gravity. Exclusively from Landscape Structures; leading the evolution of play. See Evos in action at playlsi.com/go/Evos. 2 SITELINES BC Society Of Landscape Architects Editor’s note By Brett Hitchins 110 - 355 Burrard st. Vancouver, BC V6C 2G8 604.682.5610 604.681.3394 T F Since August 17th, traveling from downtown Vancouver to YVR International Airport W www.bcsla.org E [email protected] www.sitelines.org has been much easier. The $1.9 billion Canada Line SkyTrain project is up and running and critics are clamoring to offer their opinions on the successes and shortcomings of the rapid transit. Canada Line is the poster child of recent transportation projects, but it is one of many projects in progress across the province that are focusing on two objectives: (1) Improving the PresidenT Katherine Dunster PresidenT Elect Mark van der Zalm efficiency and safety of our daily commutes and the transport of goods, and (2) bolstering lo- Past PresidenT David Thompson cal economies through improved access to business and industrial areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Public Works and Transportation Committee MINUTES NEXT COMMITTEE MEETING DATE PRESENTATION PLANNING and DEVELOPMENT DIVIS
    Agenda Public Works and Transportation Committee Anderson Room, City Hall 6911 No. 3 Road Wednesday, March 21, 2018 4:00 p.m. Pg. # ITEM MINUTES PWT-5 Motion to adopt the minutes of the meeting of the Public Works and Transportation Committee held on February 21, 2018. NEXT COMMITTEE MEETING DATE April 18, 2018, (tentative date) at 4:00 p.m. in the Anderson Room PRESENTATION 1. Leo Chan, Vice President, Canadian High-Speed Rail Research Institute, to present on the Richmond-Chilliwack High Speed Rail proposal. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION 2. TRANSLINK SOUTHWEST AREA TRANSPORT PLAN – FINAL PLAN (File Ref. No. 01-0154-04) (REDMS No. 5684886 v. 2; 5688976) PWT-81 See Page PWT-81 for full report Designated Speaker: Victor Wei PWT – 1 Public Works & Transportation Committee Agenda – Wednesday, March 21, 2018 Pg. # ITEM STAFF RECOMMENDATION (1) That TransLink’s Southwest Area Transport Plan, as attached to the report titled “TransLink Southwest Area Plan – Final Plan,” be endorsed for implementation; (2) That a copy of the report titled “TransLink Southwest Area Plan – Final Plan” be forwarded to the Richmond Council-School Board Liaison Committee for information; and (3) That Traffic Bylaw No. 5870, Amendment Bylaw No. 9816, to revise the posted speed limits on sections of Alderbridge Way and Garden City Road to support the planned transit improvements, be introduced and given first, second and third reading. 3. PUBLIC BIKE SHARE - PROPOSED PILOT PROJECT (File Ref. No. 10-6500-01) (REDMS No. 5754120 v. 4) PWT-113 See Page PWT-113 for full report Designated Speaker: Victor Wei STAFF RECOMMENDATION (1) That staff be directed to issue a Request for Proposals for the development and operation of a public bike share system as a pilot project, as described in the staff report dated February 28, 2018, from the Director, Transportation; and (2) That staff report back on the responses to the above Request for Proposals with further recommendations prior to the award of any contract(s) and implementation of the pilot program.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Memo 4 Proposed Bicycle Monitoring Program
    TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................... ES-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT AND GUIDING PRINCIPLES.................................................................... 3 2.1 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FROM PRECEDING TECHNICAL MEMORANDA ..................................................................... 3 2.2 GUIDING PRINCIPLES .................................................................................................................................. 4 3.0 NEEDS DEFINITION ......................................................................................................................... 7 3.1 APPLICATIONS ........................................................................................................................................... 7 3.2 CURRENT SITUATION AND GAP ANALYSIS ......................................................................................................... 8 3.3 NEEDS ANALYSIS ...................................................................................................................................... 10 3.4 SUMMARY OF NEEDS ................................................................................................................................ 13 4.0 ASSESSMENT INDICATORS & EVALUATION FRAMEWORK ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Walterdale Bridge Replacement and Approach Roads Evaluation
    Walterdale Bridge Replacement Concept Planning Study and Approach Roads Evaluation Final Report April 2011 4.0 BRIDGE CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT 4.1 INTRODUCTION The new Walterdale Bridge will replace the existing three-span structural steel truss bridge that was constructed in 1912 to 1913 to carry two lanes of roadway traffic and a street railway across the North Saskatchewan River in Edmonton, Alberta. The existing bridge currently carries two lanes of northbound traffic, along with pedestrians and bicyclists on sidewalks on both sides, and a number of utilities across the river. The terms of reference for the "Walterdale Bridge Replacement and Approach Roads Evaluation" indicate that the existing structure should be replaced with a functional signature bridge that will form an attractive entrance to downtown Edmonton. The replacement is to have an innovative urban design complementing the "West Rossdale Urban Design Plan", and respecting the aboriginal burial grounds on the north bank of the river. In Phase 1 of the "Walterdale Bridge Replacement and Approach Roads Evaluation", we compared signature extradosed, arch and cable-stayed bridge replacement alternatives to a more conventional girder bridge alternative. We developed the conceptual bridge designs for the Base Road Option. The geometry and appearance of the structure will be similar for the East and West Side Road Options. We assumed that the replacement bridge will carry three lanes of northbound traffic and possibly one lane of southbound traffic, in addition to pedestrians, bicyclists and utilities across the river. As the study progressed in Phase 2, a through-arch bridge was selected as the preferred alternative.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Committee Agenda
    METRO VANCOUVER REGIONAL DISTRICT WATER COMMITTEE REGULAR MEETING April 15, 2021 9:00 am 28th Floor Boardroom, 4730 Kingsway, Burnaby, British Columbia A G E N D A1 1. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA 1.1 April 15, 2021 Regular Meeting Agenda That the Water Committee adopt the agenda for its regular meeting scheduled for April 15, 2021 as circulated. 2. ADOPTION OF THE MINUTES 2.1 March 11, 2021 Regular Meeting Minutes That the Water Committee adopt the minutes of its regular meeting held March 11, 2021 as circulated. 3. DELEGATIONS 4. INVITED PRESENTATIONS 5. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEE OR STAFF 5.1 Water Services Capital Program Expenditure Update to December 31, 2020 That the Water Committee receive for information the report dated March 18, 2021, titled “Water Services Capital Program Expenditure Update to December 31, 2020”. 5.2 GVWD 2020 Water Quality Annual Report That the GVWD Board receive for information the report dated April 1, 2021, titled “GVWD 2020 Water Quality Annual Report”. 1 Note: Recommendation is shown under each item, where applicable. April 8, 2021 Water Committee Water Committee Regular Agenda April 15, 2021 Agenda Page 2 of 3 5.3 Seymour Salmonid Society’s 2020 Annual Report for Greater Vancouver Water District That the GVWD Board receive for information the report dated April 1, 2021, titled “Seymour Salmonid Society’s 2020 Annual Report for Greater Vancouver Water District“. 5.4 Watering Regulations Communications and Regional Water Conservation Campaign for 2021 That the Water Committee receive for information the report dated March 9, 2021, titled “Watering Regulations Communications and Regional Water Conservation Campaign for 2021”.
    [Show full text]
  • 10472 Scott Road, Surrey, BC
    FOR SALE 10472 Scott Road, Surrey, BC 3.68 ACRE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY WITH DIRECT ACCESS TO THE SOUTH FRASER PERIMETER ROAD PATULLO BRIDGE KING GEORGE BOULEVARD SOUTH FRASER PERIMETER ROAD (HIGHWAY #17) 10472 SCOTT ROAD TANNERY ROAD SCOTT ROAD 104 AVENUE Location The subject property is located on the corner of Scott Road and 104 Avenue, situated in the South Westminster area of Surrey, British Columbia. This location benefits from direct access to the South Fraser Perimeter Road (Highway #17) which connects to all locations in Metro Vancouver via Highways 1, 91, and 99. The location also provides convenient access south to the U.S. border, which is a 45 minute drive away via the SFPR and either Highway 1 or Highway 91. The property is surrounded by a variety of restaurants and neighbours, such as Williams Machinery, BA Robinson, Frito Lay, Lordco, Texcan and the Home Depot. SCOTT ROAD Opportunity A rare opportunity to acquire a large corner Scott Road frontage property that has been preloaded and has a development permit at third reading for a 69,400 SF warehouse. 104 AVENUE Buntzen Lake Capilano Lake West Vancouver rm A n ia North d n I 99 Vancouver BC RAIL Pitt Lake 1 Harrison Lake Bridge Lions Gate Ir o Port Moody n 99 W o PORT METRO r VANCOUVER Burrard Inlet k e r s M e m o r i a l B C.P.R. English Bay r i d g e 7A Stave Lake Port Coquitlam Vancouver Maple Ridge 7 Key Features CP INTERMODAL Coquitlam 7 1 7 9 Burnaby Pitt 7 Meadows 7 VANCOUVER P o r t M a C.P.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil-Structure Interaction Considerations in Seismic Design for Deep Bridge Foundations
    Missouri University of Science and Technology Scholars' Mine International Conference on Case Histories in (2008) - Sixth International Conference on Case Geotechnical Engineering Histories in Geotechnical Engineering 13 Aug 2008, 5:15pm - 6:45pm Soil-Structure Interaction Considerations in Seismic Design for Deep Bridge Foundations Dan Yang Buckland & Taylor Ltd., North Vancouver, BC, Canada Ernest Naesgaard Naesgaard Geotechnical Ltd., Bowen Island, BC, Canada Peter M. Byrne University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/icchge Part of the Geotechnical Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Yang, Dan; Naesgaard, Ernest; and Byrne, Peter M., "Soil-Structure Interaction Considerations in Seismic Design for Deep Bridge Foundations" (2008). International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering. 29. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/icchge/6icchge/session_01/29 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. This Article - Conference proceedings is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars' Mine. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering by an authorized administrator of Scholars' Mine. This work is protected by U. S. Copyright Law. Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION CONSIDERATIONS IN SEISMIC DESIGN FOR DEEP BRIDGE FOUNDATIONS Dan Yang Ernest Naesgaard Peter M. Byrne Buckland & Taylor Ltd. Naesgaard Geotechnical Ltd. Dept. of Civil Engineering 101-788 Harbourside Dr Bowen Island, BC Univ. of British Columbia North Vancouver, BC, Canada Canada Vancouver, BC, Canada ABSTRACT Soil-structure interaction (SSI) effects when evaluating seismic response of deep bridge foundations to earthquake loading are complex and sometimes intriguing.
    [Show full text]
  • Pattullo Bridge Replacement
    L P PATTULLO BRIDGE REPLACEMENT Date: Monday, July 15, 2013 Location: Annacis Room Time: 4:15 - 4:45 pm Presentation: Steven Lan, Director of Engineering Background Materials: Memorandum from the Director of Engineering dated July 9, 2013. i. MEMORANDUM The Corporation of Delta Engineering To: Mayor and Council From: Steven Lan, P.Eng., Director of Engineerin g Date: July 9, 201 3 Subject: Council Workshop: Pattullo Bri dge Replacement File No.: 1220·20/PATT CC: George V. Harvi e, Chief Administrative Officer TransLink recently completed the initial round of public consultation sessions in New Westminster and Surrey to solicit feedback from the public on the Pattullo Bridge. A number of alternative crossings were developed for three possible corridors: 1. Existing Pattullo Bridge Corridor 2. Sapperton Bar Corridor • New crossing located east of the existing Pattullo Bridge that would provide a more direct connection between Surrey and Coquitlam 3. Tree Island Corridor • New crossing located west of the existing Pattullo Bridge that would essentially function as an alternative to the Queensborough Bridge Based on the initial screening work that has been undertaken, six alternatives have been identified for further consideration: 1. Pattullo Bridge Corridor - Rehabilitated Bridge (3 lanes) 2. Pattullo Bridge Corridor - Rehabilitated Bridge (4 lanes) 3. Pattullo Bridge Corridor - New Bridge (4 lanes) 4. Pattullo Bridge Corridor - New Bridge (5 lanes) 5. Pattullo Bridge Corridor - New Bridge (6 lanes) 6. Sapperton Bar Corridor - New Bridge (4 lanes) coupled with Rehabilitated Pattullo Bridge (2-3 lanes) Options involving a new bridge are based on the implementation of user based charges (tolls) to help pay for the bridge upgrades.
    [Show full text]
  • George Massey Tunnel Expansion Plan Study
    Report to MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND HIGHWAYS i On GEORGE MASSEY TUNNEL EXPANSION PLANNING STUDY TTaffic Impact Taffic Operations Parking ransit Tansportation rucking Planning Modelling 4 March 26, 1991 Ministry of Transportation and Highways South Coast Regional District 7818 Sixth Street Burnaby, B.C. V3N 4N8; Attention:: Ms. Maria Swan, P.Eng. Senior Transportation Planning Engineer Dear Sir: RE: Expansion of George Massey Tunnel - Preliminary Planning Studv In accordance with your instructions, we have now carried out the preliminary planning study of the future expansion of the George Massey Tunnel on Highway 99. The attached report presents an overview of the study together with the resultant conclusions and recommendations. Thank you for the opportunity to work on this project on behalf of the Ministry. I trust that this report enables your staff to continue with the next steps necessary to bring these recommendations to fruition. 145gmasy\gmt.rpt 520 - 1112 West Pender Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6E 2S1 Tel: (604) 688-8826 Fax: 688-9562 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................... 1 1.1 Background to Study ....................................... 1 1.2 Scope of Study ........................................... 2 1.3 History and Role of the George Massey Tunnel ...................... 2 2.0 EXISTING TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM .......................... 5 2.1 Regional Road Network ..................................... 5 2.2 Current Traffic Volumes on Fraser River Crossings .................... 8 2.3 Historic Growth in Traffic Volumes .............................. 12 2.4 Growth in Capacity Across the South Arm ......................... 21 2.5 Physical Constraints on Highway 99 .............................. 22 2.6 Projected Growth in Ferry Traffic ............................... 22 2.7 Role of Transit ........................................... 23 3.0 GROWTH IN TRAVEL DEMAND ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Pattullo Bridge Replacement Project Strategic Options Analysis
    Pattullo Bridge Replacement Project Strategic Options Analysis January 2018 Pattullo Bridge Replacement Project January 2018 Strategic Options Analysis Page 2 of 37 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Purpose and Approach ............................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Multiple Account Evaluation ........................................................................................................ 4 2 CONTEXT ............................................................................................................................................. 5 2.1 Historic analysis .......................................................................................................................... 5 3 CURRENT SITUATION, PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES, AND STRATEGIC OPTIONS ..... 8 3.1 Project Goals and Objectives ..................................................................................................... 8 3.2 Current Situation ....................................................................................................................... 10 3.3 Strategic Project Delivery Options ............................................................................................ 11 3.4 Strategic options – Capital Costs and Operational Considerations .......................................... 13 4 MULTIPLE ACCOUNT EVALUATION ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Outcomes in Suicidal Bridge Jumping in the Lower Mainland-JRB
    Outcomes in suicidal bridge jumping in the Lower Mainland by DYLAN STEPHANIAN BASc, The University of British Columbia, 2014 Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in The Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies (Experimental Medicine) The University of British ColumbiA (Vancouver) December, 2019 © Dylan Stephanian, 2019 The following individuals certify that they have read, and recommend to the faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies for acceptance, the thesis entitled: Outcomes in suicidal bridge jumping in the Lower Mainland Submitted by Dylan Stephanian in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MAster of Science in Experimental Medicine. Examining committee Dr Jeff Brubacher, Emergency Medicine Supervisor Dr Doug Brown, Emergency Medicine Supervisory Committee Member Dr Andrew MacPherson, Emergency Medicine External Examiner ii Abstract On average, one person attempts suicide by jumping from a bridge in the Lower Mainland of British ColumbiA once every 14 days, but the population that jumps and their outcomes following a suicide attempt are poorly understood. A multi-agency retrospective chart review was performed using records from the Canadian Coast Guard, Joint Rescue Coordination Center, police departments, and the British Columbia Coroner’s Service to identify incidents. A complete picture of each incident was then built by identifying corresponding BC Ambulance Service and hospital records, and linking all records for each incident. This methodology successfully identified a comprehensive list of incidents, and may be useful in future prehospital and search and rescue medicine research. Records from the ten agencies involved in these incidents were collected and linked to create a dataset describing all known jumps from a bridge >12m in height in the Lower Mainland of BC from January 1, 2006 to February 28, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Downtown Community Plan
    DOWNTOWN COMMUNITY PLAN www.newwestcity.ca AMENDMENTS TO DOWNTOWN COMMUNITY PLAN – SCHEDULE C OF THE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN (BYLAW NO. 7925, 2017) (JUNE 2020) This is a consolidation of the bylaws listed below. The amendment bylaws have been combined with the original bylaw for convenience only. This consolidation is not a legal document. Certified copies of the original bylaws should be consulted for all interpretations and applications of the bylaws on this subject. Bylaw Number Effective Date 8039, 2019 October 1, 2018 (Electric Vehicle Infrastructure) 8151, 2019 January 27, 2020 (DPA General Exemptions and Minor Updates) The bylaw numbers identified in this consolidation refer to the bylaws that amended the principal Bylaw No. 7925, 2017. The number of any amending bylaw that has been repealed is not referred to in this consolidation. Original bylaws may be obtained from the Legislative Services Department. Downtown New Westminster Our Community. Our Vision. Our Plan. Created in 2010 DOWNTOWN COMMUNITY PLAN i Acknowledgements MAYOR AND COUNCIL SPECIAL STUDY CONSULTANTS Wayne Wright Mayor Coriolis Consulting Corp. (Growth) Jonathon Cote Councillor Halcrow (Transportation) Bill Harper Councillor HB Lanarc (Sustainability Plan) Jaimie McEvoy Councillor Stephen Scheving Planning Consultant Betty McIntosh Councillor Urban Forum Associates (Public Realm Plan) Bob Osterman Councillor Lorrie Williams Councillor DOWNTOWN COMMUNITY PLAN TASK GROUP Maureen Arvanitidis Heritage Preservation Society CITY STAFF Caroline Bonesky New Westminster
    [Show full text]