DARK MATTER and NEUTRINOS Arxiv:1711.10564V1 [Physics.Pop-Ph]

Physics Education 1 dateline

DARK MATTER AND NEUTRINOS Gazal Sharma1, Anu2 and B. C. Chauhan3 Department of Physics & Astronomical Science School of Physical & Material Sciences Central University of Himachal Pradesh (CUHP) Dharamshala, Kangra (HP) INDIA-176215. [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] (Submitted 03-08-2015)

Abstract

The Keplerian distribution of velocities is not observed in the rotation of large scale structures, such as found in the rotation of spiral galaxies. The deviation from Keplerian distribution provides compelling evidence of the presence of non-luminous matter i.e. called dark matter. There are several astrophysical motivations for investigating the dark matter in and around the galaxy as halo. In this work we address various theoretical and experimental indications pointing towards the existence of this unknown form of matter. Amongst its constituents neutrino is one of the most prospective candidates. We know the neutrinos oscillate and have tiny masses, but there are also signatures for existence of heavy and light sterile neutrinos and possibility of their mixing. Altogether, the role of neutrinos is of great interests in cosmology and understanding dark matter.

arXiv:1711.10564v1 [physics.pop-ph] 23 Nov 2017 1 Introduction revealed in 2013 that our Universe contains 68.3% of dark energy, 26.8% of dark matter, and only 4.9% of the Universe is known mat- As a human being the biggest surprise for us ter which includes all the stars, planetary sys- was, that the Universe in which we live in tems, galaxies, and interstellar gas etc.. This is mostly dark. The NASA’s Plank Mission

Volume xx, Number y Article Number : n. www.physedu.in Physics Education 2 dateline raises a number of questions in our minds; a mystery. e.g. how much and how well we know about The next question to be addressed is about our Universe? What are dark matter and the constituents of dark matter. One of the dark energy? What are they made up of? biggest discoveries made by Hubble Space The very first suggestion of dark matter in Telescope (HST) of NASA was the confir- our galaxy was made by Kapteyn and Jeans mation of invisible matter in the Universe. in 1922 and then by Lindblad in 1926. They A 3D map of dark matter was derived from proposed the existence of dark matter while largest survey of the Universe made by the observing the motions of nearby stars at right HST, the Cosmic Evolution Survey (COS- angle to the plane of our Milky way galaxy. MOS). The COSMOS survey covers a suffi- Oort in 1932 claimed that there exists sub- ciently wide area of sky - nine times the area stantial amount of dark matter near the sun of the full Moon (1.6 square degrees) - for by observing the vertical motions of stars. the large-scale filamentary structure of an in- However, in 1991, Kuijken and Gilmore ar- visible form of matter that makes up most gued that there were no significant evidence of the mass of Universe i.e. dark matter to for dark matter with in the galactic disk near be clearly evident [1]. The theory of Big- the sun. Bang nucleosynthesis (BBN), i.e. formation Sinclair Smith and Fritz Zwicky in 1933, of light nuclei just after Big-Bang, as well studied the large clusters of galaxies and as experimental evidences from anisotropies found that galaxies were on average moving in Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation too fast for the cluster to be held together (CMBR) observed by NASA’s Wilkinson Mi- only by the mass of the visible matter. They crowave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) indicate concluded that in rich clusters of galaxies, a that most of the dark matter stuff is non- large portion of the matter is not visible i.e. baryonic (which is not made up of regular the dark matter. The idea of dark matter in matter). galactic halo was given by Freeman in 1970, Many experiments has been performed in while studying the rotation curve for NGC search of dark matter candidates. Neutrinos, 300 and M33 by using the 21cm-Line of neu- which are electrically neutral and tiny parti- tral hydrogen did not show the expected Kep- cles, seem potential candidates for dark mat- lerian decline beyond the optical radii. Then ter, as they are long-lived and almost non- in 1979, Vera Rubin proposed that normal interacting with other particles. However, spiral galaxies contain substantial amount of the three known types of neutrinos, called ac- dark matter present at great distances from tive neutrinos, are not massive enough to ac- the central regions. An influential model was count for all of the dark matter of Universe. proposed by Caldwell and Ostriker in 1981 for So, theorists proposed another type of neu- the density of core-halo type model of dark trinos that would not interact at all with the matter. The halo model is valid till now but regular matter, but are massive. If the sterile the exact distribution of dark matter is still neutrino is heavy enough about ∼ 10 keV ,

Volume xx, Number y Article Number : n. www.physedu.in Physics Education 3 dateline it could account for the substantial amount of gravitation. It has been found that or- of dark matter. The present article aims to bital velocities of planets decreases with dis- introduce reader about the dark matter, its tance from the centre of the sun. In spiral evidences, possible constituents and the po- galaxy the gas, dust and stars in the disk of tential candidature of neutrinos in the com- the galaxy all orbit around a common cen- position of dark matter. tre. Like planets in solar system, the gas and stars move in response to the combined gravitational attraction of all other mass. If 2 Dark Matter the galaxy is visualized as a spheroid, we can calculate the gravitational attraction due to As discussed above the dark matter is the mass Mr lying between the centre and an ob- matter, which does not interact with light at ject of mass m in an equatorial orbit at a all or may interact very poorly that it remains distance r from the centre. If the galaxy is dark and unseen. As such, a question arises neither contracting nor expanding then the in ones mind; how one can detect something gravitational force is exactly equal to the cen- which does not interact with light. The an- trifugal force on the mass at distance r is swer may be ’gravity’; such that there are given by the equation many astrophysical motivations for the detection of dark matter. There have been ob- 2 2 GmMr/r = mvr /r, (1) tained a number of observational evidences for the existence of dark matter because of where vr is the orbital velocity. When the its gravitational effects, like galactic rotation equation is solved for vr , the value of m drops curves of galaxies measured by Vera Rubin, out and the velocity of a body at a distance confinement of hot gas in the galaxies, mea- r from the centre is determined only by the surement on the basis of gravitational lensing mass Mr inward from its position. In the so- [2], etc... lar system, virtually all the mass is concentrated near the√ centre and the orbital velocity 2.1 Flattened Orbital Velocity decrease as 1/ r, that is called Keplerian de- Curves cline. In a galaxy the brightness is strongly Before describing observations let us see how peaked near the centre and falls off rapidly celestial objects respond to the gravitational with distance. As per the distribution of lu- force acting on them and how that response minosity, it was expected that stars at in- can reveal the large scale distribution of mat- creasing distance from the centre would have ter. For the planets in orbit around the sun decreasing Keplerian orbital velocities. When which embodies essentially all the mass of the the orbital velocity of different stars present solar system, the decrease in gravitational at- at different distances in a galaxy was studied traction with distance is given by Newton law by Vera Rubin, the unexpected results came

Volume xx, Number y Article Number : n. www.physedu.in Physics Education 4 dateline

in mass with radius indicates that each suc- Figure 1: Variation of orbital velocity with cessive shell of matter in the galaxy must con- radius [3] tain just as much mass as every other shell of the same thickness. Since the volume V of each successive shell increases as the square of the radius, the density ρ of matter in successive shells must decrease in order to keep ρV constant [4]. The widely accepted idea about the dark matter is that each spiral galaxy is embed- ded into a halo of dark matter. The gravitational attraction of the unseen mass keeps out. This observation has been made for dif- the orbital velocities high at larger distance ferent spiral galaxies like Sa, Sb, Sc etc... Al- from galactic centre. Till now we are not able though each galaxy exhibits distinctive fea- to find the exact distribution of dark matter ture in its rotational pattern, the systematic but we can say that it is strongly clumped trends that emerge are impressive. With in- around the galaxies. The density of dark halo creasing luminosity galaxies are bigger, or- decreases with distance from galactic centre bital velocities are higher and the velocity as given by Caldwell and Ostriker gradient across the nuclear bulge is steeper. Moreover, each type of galaxy displays char- ρ0 ρ = . (2) acteristic rotational properties. d r2 1 + a2 Therefore we can draw conclusion from our observation that all the rotation curves are They found a fit for the data with ρ0 = 1.37× −2 −3 either flat or rising out to the visible limits 10 M pc , and a = 7.8kpc. of the galaxy. There are no extensive re- If we consider a different distribution for gions where the velocities fall off with dis- dark matter in which we put all the unseen tance from the centre, as would be predicted matter in a disk, the disk will quickly become if mass were centrally concentrated. The con- unstable. Therefore P. Ostriker and Pee- clusion is inescapable- mass unlike luminosity ble suggest that the halos are important for is not concentrated near the centre of spi- stabilizing the disk. Additional evidence on ral galaxies. Thus the light distribution in the high rotational velocity was provided by a galaxy is not at all a guide to mass dis- the 21-centimetre radio waves emitted by the tribution. Instead the mass inside any given neutral hydrogen in the galactic disk. From radial distance is increasing linearly with dis- the above discussion we can draw a conclu- tance and contrary to what one might expect, sion that the density of dark matter halo sur- is not converging to a limiting mass at the rounding the visible matter decreases slowly edge of the visible disk. The linear increase outwards.

Volume xx, Number y Article Number : n. www.physedu.in Physics Education 5 dateline

2.2 Gravitational lensing lensing to map the dark matter in the Uni- verse and provide clues to its nature. MOA According to Einstein’s theory of general (Micro-lensing Observations in Astrophysics) relativity large objects with their immense is a Japan/NZ collaboration that makes ob- masses can distort space-time therefore large servations on dark matter, extra-solar plan- massive objects such as galaxy clusters bend ets and stellar atmospheres using the grav- light from distant sources, creating distorted itational micro-lensing technique at the Mt images that we can see here on earth. This is John Observatory in New Zealand. HST of called gravitational lensing. This technique NASA recently produces several images of is especially useful for detecting dark matter. gravitational lensed objects. Therefore find- Since dark matter doesn’t interact with light, ing enough gravitational lenses to constrain it can’t be seen directly. However, since dark the properties of dark matter structures re- matter is very massive, it can be detected in- quires a powerful telescope with a huge field directly by the distorted images it creates of of view like LSST. normal matter through gravitational lensing. By measuring the angle of bending, the mass of the gravitational lens can be calculated- 2.3 Fluctuations in CMBR greater the bend, more massive the lens is. The Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) Therefore the angle of deflection is given by is the earliest photograph of our Universe. [5] The patterns that we see in observations of 4GM the CMB were set up by competition between α = 2 , (3) c b two forces acting on matter; the force of grav- where b is the impact parameter. Us- ity causing matter to fall inward and an out- ing this method, astronomers have confirmed ward pressure exerted by photons (or parti- that the galactic clusters indeed have high cles of light). This competition caused the masses exceeding those measured by the lu- photons and matter to oscillate into-and-out- minous matter. There have been several posi- of dense regions. If the Universe consisted tive reports on the observation of such micro- partially of dark matter in addition to nor- lensing, even though typically only one in a mal matter, that pattern would be affected million stars examined is expected to show dramatically. The existence of dark matter such an effect. The bending of light by leaves a characteristic imprint on CMB ob- a massive object, a general relativity effect servations, as it clumps into dense regions has been verified to extreme accuracy (bet- and contributes to the gravitational collapse ter than 1%) by studying radar echoes from of matter, but is unaffected by the pressure the planets when they are in conjunction. from photons. We can predict these oscil- Experiments like the Large Synoptic Sur- lations in the CMB with and without dark vey Telescope (LSST), under construction in matter, which often present in the form of a Chile, aim to take advantage of gravitational power spectrum.

Volume xx, Number y Article Number : n. www.physedu.in Physics Education 6 dateline

The power spectrum of the CMB shows us gas is not enough to account for the discrep- the strength of photon-matter oscillations at ancies in mass and that the visible matter ap- different parts of sky. The Far-Infrared Abso- proximately constitutes only 12 − 15% of the lute Spectrophotometer (FIRAS) instrument mass of the cluster. Otherwise, there won’t has measured the spectrum of the cosmic be sufficient gravity in the cluster to prevent background radiation, making it the most the hot gas from escaping [6]. precisely measured black body spectrum in Recently in 2014, data came from the Euro- nature. The Cosmic Background Explorer pean Space Agency’s (ESA’s) XMM-Newton (COBE) was launched in 1989 in search of spacecraft, which was analysed by an inter- temperature anisotropies; frequency power national team of researchers. After scouring spectrum; solar system and galactic dust through thousands of signals, they spotted a foregrounds. The WMAP in 2010 was the weird spike in X-ray emissions coming from first instrument to measure the CMB power two different spots in the Universe: the An- spectrum through the first peak of oscilla- dromeda galaxy and the Perseus galaxy clus- tions, and showed that the existence of dark ter. The signal doesn’t correspond to any matter is favoured. Comparison of such cal- known particle or atom, and is unlikely to culations with the observations of CMB Ra- be the result of a measurement or instrument diation by Plank mission team in 2013 have error hence it could have been produced by shown that the total mass energy of the a dark matter particle. The signal’s distribu- known Universe contains 4.9% ordinary mat- tion within the galaxy corresponds exactly to ter, 26.8% dark matter and 68.3% dark en- what we expects with dark matter i.e. con- ergy. Thus dark Universe constitutes 95.1% centrated and intense in the centre of objects of the total matter energy content of the Uni- and weaker and diffuse on the edges. Scien- verse [6]. tists believe that there is a possibility that it could come from dark matter candidate i.e. 2.4 X- Ray Studies possibly the hypothetical heavy sterile neutrinos; as it is believed the decay of these The observational evidences from X- ray particles could produce X-rays [7]. studies also supports the existence of dark matter. The basic technique is to estimate the temperature and density of the gas from 3 Baryonic & the energy and flux of the X-rays using X- Non-Baryonic Dark ray telescopes, which would further enable the mass of the galactic cluster to be de- Matter rived. The measurements of hot gas pressure in galactic clusters by X-ray telescopes, such On the basis of observed orbital velocity as CHANDRA X-ray observatory by NASA, curves, and other evidences we can say that have shown that the amount of superheated dark matter exists. Baryonic dark matter is

Volume xx, Number y Article Number : n. www.physedu.in Physics Education 7 dateline non-luminous matter in which most of the by ρ mass is attributed to baryons, most proba- Ω = , (4) bly neutrons and protons. Candidates for ρc baryonic dark matter include non-luminous where ρc is the critical density (average gas, Massive Astrophysical Compact Halo density of Universe to halt its expansion) Objects (MACHOs). These MACHOs may of the Universe and Ω0 represents present include condensed objects such as black holes, energy density of Universe. Measurements neutron stars, white dwarf, very faint stars, of the baryon density in the Universe using or non-luminous objects like planets and CMBR spectrum and primordial nucleosyn- brown dwarfs. Baryonic dark matter can- thesis (i.e. BBN) constrain the baryon den- not be detected by its emitted radiation be- 0 sity Ωb to a value less than 0.05. The dif- cause these objects have very low luminosity, 0 0 ference Ωm − Ωb ' 0.22 must be in form of but the presence of these objects can be in- non-baryonic dark matter [8]. The value of ferred from their gravitational effects on vis- total matter density ible matter [6]. 0 2 +0.008 Ωmh = 0.135−0.009, (5) The nucleosynthesis of the elements and observations of the Cosmic Microwave Back- out of which the baryonic matter is ground Radiations (CMBR) puts constraints 0 2 +0.0009 on the density of baryonic matter. No more Ωb h = 0.0224−0.0009, (6) than 15% of the matter in the Universe can be baryonic but most of dark matter stuff in the form of neutrinos is non-baryonic. Non-baryonic dark matter Ω0h2 < 0.0076, (7) (NBDM) is non-luminous matter made from ν non-baryonic stuff (other than protons, neu- and the matter in the form of Cold Dark trons etc.). Recent measurements of the mat- 0 0 Matter (CDM) is ter density Ωm and the energy density ΩΛ comes from three types of observations: 1) 0 2 +0.008 ΩCDM h = 0.113−0.009. (8) supernova measurements of the recent expansion history of the Universe; 2) cosmic mi- The results of BBN that tell that ΩB ∼ crowave background measurements of the de- 0.01 and therefore if Ω total is truly unity, gree of spatial flatness, and 3) measurements then the bulk of the mass of the Universe of the amount of matter in galaxy structures must be in the form of some sort of non- obtained through big galaxy redshift surveys baryonic matter. From baryon to photon ra- agree with each other in a region around the tio i.e. η = ηB/ηγ, one can find the range for best current values of the matter and energy η as given by [20] 0 0 densities Ωm ' 0.27 and ΩΛ ' 0.73. Where Ω is the energy density of Universe defined 4.7 × 10−10 ≤ η ≤ 6.5 × 10−10. (9)

Volume xx, Number y Article Number : n. www.physedu.in Physics Education 8 dateline

We can find relative baryon density ΩB as to detect WIMPs include the search for prod- ucts of WIMP annihilation, including gamma rays, neutrinos and cosmic rays in nearby 0 2 0.017 ≤ ΩBh ≤ 0.024. (10) galaxies and galaxy clusters; direct detection experiments designed to measure the collision This shows that Universe is not closed by of WIMPs with nuclei in the laboratory, as baryonic matter and this gives the indication well as attempts to directly produce WIMPs of existence of dark matter. From the analy- in colliders, such as the LHC. However all the sis of the existing data follows that efforts in this direction has been fruitless so far. ΩDM ' 0.20. (11) The HDM consists of particles to be mov- The non-baryonic dark matter is classified ing nearly at the speed of light, when the in terms of the mass of the particle that pre-galactic clumps began to form. HDM in- is assumed to make it up, and the typical cludes massive (∼ eV ) neutrinos. The neutri- velocity dispersion of those particles (since nos are the only hot dark matter candidate more massive particles move more slowly). as they are light enough to move with the There are three prominent hypotheses on speed of light. The Universe is full of neu- non-baryonic dark matter, called Hot Dark trinos left over from just after the Big-Bang, Matter (HDM), Warm Dark Matter (WDM), when matter and anti-matter were formed. and Cold Dark Matter (CDM); some com- There are huge amount of neutrinos, that bination of these is also possible. CDM is if they have just a tiny mass, then they composed of substantially massive particles can significantly account for the dark mat- (∼ GeV ) expected to be moving with non- ter. The dark matter that has properties in- relativistic speeds. The leading candidates termediate between those of hot dark matter for CDM called WIMPs (Weakly Interact- and cold dark matter named as Warm Dark ing Massive Particles). WIMPs could include Matter (WDM). WDM is composed of sub- large number of exotic particles such as neu- relativistic particles having masses (∼ keV ) tralinos, axions, photinos etc. These parti- causing structure formation to occur bottom- cles forms dark matter, because they have too up (micro to macro scale)from above their much mass to move at high speeds and that free-streaming scale, and top-down (macro to they are the best candidates for dark mat- micro scale) below their free streaming scale. ter. As WIMPs can interact through grav- The most common WDM candidates are con- itational and weak forces only, they are ex- sidered to be sterile neutrinos and gravitinos. tremely difficult to detect. There are several The WIMPs when produced non-thermally experiments setup for detection of WIMPs could be candidates for WDM [9]. such as SuperCDMS, NASA’s Fermi Gamma- The most widely discussed models for non- Ray Space telescope, Large Hydron Collider baryonic dark matter is based on the CDM (LHC) at Geneva etc... Experimental efforts hypothesis. CDM leads to bottom-up forma-

Volume xx, Number y Article Number : n. www.physedu.in Physics Education 9 dateline

tion of structure in the Universe i.e. small nomenon, it is confirmed that neutrinos have scale structures led to the formation of large mass. The nature of neutrinos is not yet un- scale structures. On the other hand, the derstood i.e. whether they are Dirac or Ma- HDM results in top-down formation scenario jorana particles. In case of Dirac nature neu- i.e. first super-cluster formed and then galax- trino and antineutrino are different, while in ies and then the formation of small structure the Majorana nature they are the same par- takes place. However, WDM has intermedi- ticle. Despite the tininess, the neutrino mass ate role in large scale structure formation. has far-reaching implications in astrophysics and cosmology.

4 Neutrino Dark Matter Neutrinos are considered to be the constituent of dark matter via thermal mecha- Neutrinos are most abundant particles in the nism. As discussed above the hot dark matter Universe. They are electrically neutral and is the matter that was relativistic until just have tiny mass. Out of four interactions in before the epoch of galaxy formation, neutri- nature neutrinos interact only via the weak nos of very low mass are strongest candidates interaction and feebly via gravitational force. for hot dark matter. It is believed that neu- They rarely interact with any material, which trinos were in thermal equilibrium with the makes experimental detection of these parti- hot plasma which filled the early Universe. cles extremely challenging. There are three As the Universe expanded and cooled, the types of neutrinos so far detected, which are rates of weak interaction processes decreases denoted as electronic (νe), muonic (νµ), and and neutrino decoupled when these rates be- tauonic (ντ ) flavour eigenstates. In fact, in came smaller than the Hubble expansion rate. the Standard Model of particle physics, neu- Since for the three known light neutrinos with trinos are massless. However, in the late 90’s masses smaller than 1eV , the decoupling oc- st and beginning of 21 century, physicists ob- curred when they were relativistic called hot served neutrino oscillation, a quantum me- relics. As their interaction of cross section chanical effect which would not occur unless with matter is very small therefore, the di- neutrinos have mass. The theory of neutrino rect detection of these relativistic neutrinos oscillation describes the flavor eigenstates as is an extremely difficult task. In early Uni- the mixing or linear superposition of mass verse, when 1MeV ≤ Tγ ≤ 100MeV , neutri- eigenstates ν1, ν2, ν3. For two flavour case nos were kept in equilibrium with primordial the mixing is shown as plasma by the weak interactions. The reactions of neutrinos with nucleons were neg- νe cos θ sin θ ν1 = , (12) ligible, because the number density of the νµ −sinθ cos θ ν2 non-relativistic nucleons was much smaller where θ is a mixing angle. From the ob- than the density of relativistic electrons and servation of the neutrino oscillations phe- positrons. The interaction rate for each neu-

Volume xx, Number y Article Number : n. www.physedu.in Physics Education 10 dateline trino is given by[13] The sterile neutrino was originally proposed as a dark matter candidate by Dodel- Γ = n < σv >, (13) son and Widrow in 1993 to solve the discrep- ancies between the CDM predicted structure where n is the number density of target formation and observations [20]. Since neu- particles, σ is the cross-section and v is the trinos were relativistic at the time of decou- neutrino velocity. The bracket denote the pling, the number density of relic neutrinos thermal averaging. For weak interaction pro- is given by the relativistic expression inde- cesses pendent from the values of their masses. In 2 2 other words, light neutrinos are hot relics and < σv > = GF Tγ , (14) contribute to the hot dark matter in the Uni- where the temperature (Tγ) gives the order verse. Sterile neutrinos have been invoked to of magnitude of the energies of the relativistic generate masses for light neutrinos; as such particles participating in the reactions. As the mix with light neutrinos and hence can the number density of relativistic particles is be produced via oscillations [20]. With this 3 given as n ∼ Tγ , the interaction rate for each mechanism, their relic density is estimated to neutrino became be

2 5 1.8 Γ ∼ GF Tγ . (15) sin2 θ M Ω ≈ N . (16) N 3 × 10−9 3keV So we can say that interaction rate decreases rapidly with the decrease of the temperature due to expansion of the Universe Here, θ is the mixing angle between the and we obtain the decoupling temperature for sterile neutrinos N with mass MN and the ν active neutrinos. It has been seen that a vi- neutrinos Tγ ∼ 1MeV . If the active neutrinos have a non-zero able sterile neutrino to be the dark matter mass, as indicated by several neutrino oscil- candidate requires a mass of keV and a very lation experiments, the sterile neutrinos will small mixing angle. It is a WDM candidate take part in the neutrino oscillations. The and its interactions are dominated by gravity, sterile neutrinos are ’sterile’ as they practi- as preferred by the structure formation [22]. cally inactive, and they don’t interact via any Neutrinos with masses much smaller than other interactions with active neutrino except the effective neutrino temperature are still by mixing [21]. This allows a possibility for relativistic and have negligible contribution a radiative decay under emission of an X-ray toward the energy density of the Universe. photon with energy of half the sterile neu- Despite the second most abundant particles trino mass. However, it needs much more after the photons, neutrinos fail to accommo- confirmation before one accepts this as the date the observed abundance of dark matter. explanation. The relic density of light neutrinos is fixed as

Volume xx, Number y Article Number : n. www.physedu.in Physics Education 11 dateline

[13] of P m < 1.3 eV at 95% c.l. [10], which is P ν mi more constrained than ≈ 2.1eV , that is the Ω0h2 = i . (17) ν 94.14eV first releases [11]. However, the most recent Thus, the neutrino energy density is pro- and sophisticated analysis of Lyman-a data portional to the sum of neutrino masses. This gives an upper bound of 0.9 eV for the sum of value is relevant for the present energy bal- neutrino masses. In summary, at present the ance if there are neutrinos with masses of the bound on the sum of neutrino masses can be order of 1eV or more. Before the neutrino de- in the range between 0.3 and more than 2 eV, coupling around Tγ ' 1MeV , the weak pro- depending on the data and parameters used. cesses were in equilibrium. The bound can be relaxed somewhat when Ω > 1, implies a closed Universe, which more parameters, such as sterile neutrinos means that at some time the gravitation at- (νs) are included. In the most conservative traction will stop the expansion and Universe case the bound is above 2.5 eV if only CMB will collapse again. An Ω < 1, means a Uni- data is used. When CMB data is combined verse which expands forever. However Ω = 1 with LSS data in the linear or almost linear means a flat Universe. At present time, Ω regime, combined with a prior on the Hub- is changing on time scale of seconds. Since ble parameter the upper bound is robustly our existence is not compatible with the Uni- below 1 eV. This is true even for extended verse which is either closed or continuously models. Here it should perhaps also be noted expanding, the only long term value that Ω that the bound on neutrino mass from cos- is close to unity. Although the detailed phys- mic structure formation applies to any other, ical mechanism for driving the expansion is hypothetical particle species which decouples not well determined and differs in different while still relativistic. This could for exam- grand unified theories. ple be low mass sterile neutrinos. It could The phenomenon of sudden and fast ex- also be relatively high mass axions which de- pansion of Universe caused by a scalar field couple after the QCD phase transition. present in the nascent stage is known as ’in- Neutrinos have a kinematical advantages flation’. Inflation provides a possible mecha- over the dark matter candidates is that they nism to set the initial conditions. From the cluster on large scales, where the dark matter inflation paradigm, it is the argument that is needed to hold the large clusters of galaxies. the only long lived natural value for Ω is unity In HDM, since they decoupled at a temper- and that inflation provided the early Universe ature of the order of 1MeV when they were with the mechanism to achieve that value and relativistic and formed relativistic HDM gas. thereby solve some of the main problems of The HDM perturbations within the horizon standard model of cosmology; e.g. the flat- are erased by free streaming (i.e. the ran- ness and smoothness problems. dom particle velocities close to the velocity of The WMAP-7 data provides a quite strin- light disperse all HDM over-densities). Free gent constraint on the sum of neutrino masses streaming ceases when the HDM gas becomes

Volume xx, Number y Article Number : n. www.physedu.in Physics Education 12 dateline

non-relativistic at some red-shift Znr. Thus, so called BBN bound). The lower limit to only the HDM perturbations with wavelength baryon density is based on the Big-Bang pro- 2 larger than the horizon distance at Znr sur- duction of deuterium H, which rises rapidly vive and can take part in the generation of with decreasing baryon density. Since all the structure in the Universe. Since the horizon neutrons end up in forming 4He, which is the distance at Znr is typically much larger than most tightly bound stable light nucleus, the 4 the volume corresponding to the galactic size mass fraction of He is denoted as Yp, and is masses, so in a Universe dominated by HDM, given by [13] the formation of structures must proceed ac- 2n cording to top-down mechanism. However Y ' n ' 0.25. (18) p n + n the observed statistical properties favours n p bottom-up mechanism i.e. small structures As per recent estimates of Yp with con- leading to the formation of large scale struc- servative assumptions - for 3He chemi- tures. Hence the HDM contribute to the for- cal evolution and Yp = 0.252, less than mation of small scale structures while CDM four neutrino species are possible; how- is responsible for binding of large scale struc- ever, for extreme assumption- no limit to tures [13]. primeval deuterium- less than five neutrino The standard model does not predict any species are allowed which implies there ex- masses for the active neutrinos, but as stated ist fourth neutrino flavor that is sterile neu- above the masses are required by the ex- trino. In summary, there are healthy sig- perimentally verified neutrino oscillations. natures for additional degrees of freedom A simple way to incorporate the neutrino Nν > 3 i.e. the species of sterile neutri- masses is to extend the model with the right- nos from various studies, which are given handed neutrinos just as done for the other el- below [16]: 2.98 < Nν < 4.48 [BBN](68% ementary particles of SM. It is possible to add CL); 3.03 < Nν < 7.59 [WMAP5+SDSS- an arbitrary number of sterile neutrinos, but DR7+Ho ] (95% C.L.); 3.46 < Nν < 5.20 at least three sterile neutrinos are needed to [WMAP7+BAO+New Ho](68% CL); 4.0 < explain the neutrino oscillations, the baryon Nν < 6.6 [WMAP7+ACT data](68% C.L.); asymmetry, and the dark matter [14]. The 2.22 < Nν < 9.66 [WMAP3](68% CL). successful ’three sterile neutrinos’ extension Using recombination-era observables of the standard model is called the (Neu- including the CMB, the shift parame- trino Minimal Standard Model)(νMSM). It is ter RCMB and the sound horizon from re-normalisable and in agreement with most Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) particle physics experiments [15]. The Big- severely constrain the sterile neutrino 4 − Bang production of He increases with η. sin 2θ < 0.026(ms/eV ) 2.[17]. Recent Thus upper limit to 4He abundance and a bounds on the mixing between the active lower limit to baryon density lead to an upper and the sterile neutrinos have been derived limit to number of neutrino species Nν (i.e. from the combination of neutrino oscillation

Volume xx, Number y Article Number : n. www.physedu.in Physics Education 13 dateline data and direct experimental searches for evidences for dark matter, its composition, sterile neutrinos.[18] Electron neutrino-sterile the role of neutrinos in dark matter formation neutrino mixing bound [19] from joint fits and understanding of its dynamics. Baryon of solar, KamLAND, Daya-Bay and Reno to photon ratio shows that our Universe is experiments is sin 2θes < 0.2. and the analy- not closed by baryonic matter, which gives a sis of cosmological data in terms of ΛCDM clear indication of the existence of dark mat- constrains the mass square difference with ter. Given the properties, neutrinos fit to be 2 2 one sterile family ∆m41 < 0.25eV . a strong candidate constituent for the dark matter as they have an advantage over other dark matter candidates, e.g. they cluster on 5 Conclusions large scale where the dark matter is needed to hold the large clusters of galaxies. Despite Ever-since the dawn of civilisation man has the weakness of interactions and smallness of been fascinated by the stars, planets and masses, they can play an important role in other heavenly objects, wondering what es- cosmology. sentially the magnificent Universe was made In addition to three active flavours of neu- up of. We learnt that our Universe is almost trinos, there could also exist extra massive completely dark. To understand this mys- neutrino states that are sterile, i.e. they tery was the main thrust to know more about are singlets of the Standard Model gauge the invisible Universe. The story of dark group and thus insensitive to weak interac- matter began nearly a century ago, when tions. Most of the current data on neutrino Kapteyn and Jeans propounded of existing a oscillations can perfectly be explained with such kind of weird matter. Later, Smith and only three active species, but there exist a Zwicky discovered that in some large clus- few experimental results [23]-[28] that can- ters of galaxies the individual members are not be explained in this framework. If neu- moving so rapidly that their mutual gravi- trino oscillations are responsible for all the tational attraction is insufficient to keep the experimental data, a solution might require clusters from flying apart. Either such clus- additional (sterile) neutrino species. These ters should be dissolving or there must be kind of particles are predicted by many the- enough dark matter present to hold them to- oretical models beyond the SM [29]. Their gether. Since, almost all the evidences sug- masses are usually heavy, while lighter ster- gest that clusters of galaxies are stable con- ile neutrinos are rarer but possible. Recent figuration. Hence it was concluded that the studies propose sterile neutrino with a mass clusters consist of both luminous and non- of the order of a few keV’s and a very small luminous matter, which was termed as dark mixing with the active neutrinos. Such heavy matter. neutrinos could be produced by active-sterile In this paper we have discussed about the oscillations but not fully thermalized, so that dark matter, various experimental hints and they could play the role of dark matter and

Volume xx, Number y Article Number : n. www.physedu.in Physics Education 14 dateline replace the usual CDM component. But due Acknowledgments to their large thermal velocity (smaller than that of active neutrinos), they would behave We thank Debasish Majumdar, SINP, for giv- as WDM and erase small-scale cosmological ing useful inputs. The Inter-University Cen- structures. At present the neutrino physics tre for Astronomy & Astrophysics (IUCAA), and neutrino astrophysics and cosmology are Pune is also acknowledged for providing re- at the cross roads. On the one hand, it is im- search facilities during the completion of this possible to deny that neutrinos oscillate and work. thus presumably have small masses, and on the other unless a sterile neutrino truly exists, there is a sense that neutrino masses are References too small to be of very much cosmological interests. [1] Massey, R. et al., Dark matter maps reveal cosmic scaffolding, doi:10.1038/nature05497, 7 January In the galaxy formation scenario, galax- 2007 as the related references. ies can only form by the collapse of super- clusters. The detailed study shows that the [2] E. Copeland, Dark Matter in the Uni- collapse of super-clusters only happens very verse, Contemporary Physics, 35(1), late and may be in contradiction with the ex- 1994. istence of quasars of large red shift. Although the evidences for dark matter is wide and [3] www.google.co.in/imghp [image taken deep and existence of dark matter is based from google]. on the assumption that the laws of motion [4] V. Rubin, Dark Matter in Spiral Galax- and gravity as formulated by Newton and ex- ies, Sc. Am. 248(6), 1983. tended by Einstein apply. On the other hand the modification in the theory of gravity can [5] A.C. Melissinos, Lecture Notes on Par- explain the effects attributed to dark mat- ticle Astrophysics, Physics 593- Spring ter and some scientists have proposed MOND 1995. (Modified Newtonian Dynamics). According to this theory at very low acceleration, corre- [6] S. Sharma, Bulletin of the Indian Asso- sponding to large distances, the usual law of ciation Of Physics Teachers, 6(9), 2014. gravitation is modified. Although MOND has had some success in explaining observations [7] A. Boyarsky, O. Ruchayskiy, D. of galaxies, but failed to explain the obser- Iakubovskyi and J. Franse, Unidentified vation of Bullet Clusters. So we need more Line in X-Ray Spectra of the Andromeda experimental evidences to give a conclusive Galaxy and Perseus Galaxy Cluster, theory of dark matter. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 251301, 2014.

Volume xx, Number y Article Number : n. www.physedu.in Physics Education 15 dateline

[8] P. Gondolo, Introduction to Non- [17] A. C. Vincent, E. Fernandez Martinez, Baryonic Dark Matter, Lecture deliv- P. Hernandez, M. Lattanzi, O. Mena, ered at the NATO Advanced Study In- JCAP 04 (2015)006. stitute, France [astro-ph/0403064]. [18] O. Ruchayskiy, A. Ivashko, JHEP 1206 [9] S. R. Sorensen, Sterile neutrinos as a (2012) 100. dark matter candidate, Master Thesis in [19] A. Yu. Samirnov, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Physics, Niels Bohr Institute, Dark Cos- Suppl. 235, 431 (2013) [references con- mology Centre, August 25, 2006. tained therein]. [10] E. Komatsu et al., Seven-Year Wilkinson [20] S. Bilenky, Introduction to the Physics of Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Massive and Mixed Neutrinos, Springer, Observations: Cosmological Interpre- Lecture Notes in Physics, 817, 2010. tation, WMAP Collaboration, Astro- phys.J.Suppl. 192 18 (2011). [21] Signe Riemer-Srensen, Sterile neutrinos as a dark matter candidate, Master The- [11] K. Ichikawa, M. Fukugita and M. sis in Physics Niels Bohr Institute, 2006. Kawasaki, Phys. Rev. D 71, 043001 (2005). [22] C. J. Copi, D. N. Schramm, and M. S. Turner, Big-bang Nucleosynthesis limit [12] S. Dodelson and L. M. Widrow, Sterile- to the number of neutrino species, Phys. neutrinos as dark matter, Phys. Rev. Rev. D 55, 3389, 1997. Lett. 72 (1994) 17?20. [23] A. Aguilar-Arevalo, et al., (LSND Col- [13] C. Giunti, C. W. Kim, Fundamental of laboration), Evidence for neutrino os- Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics, Ox- cillations from the observation of anti- ford University Press, New York, 2007. neutrino(electron) appearance in a antineutrino(muon) beam, Phys.Rev. D 64, [14] T. Asaka and M. Shaposhnikov, , Phys. 112007, 2001. Lett. B 620, 17, 2005. [24] A. Aguilar-Arevalo, et al., (MiniBooNE [15] T. Araki and Y. F. Li, Q Flavour 6 Collaboration), Phys, Rev, Lett. 102, Symetry Model for the Extension of the 101802, 2009. MSM by the three Right Handed Ster- ile Neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D85, 065016, [25] A. Aguilar-Arevalo, et al., (MiniBooNE 2012. Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 161801, 2013. [16] P. C. de Holanda and A. Yu. Smirnov, hep-ph/1012.5627 [references contained [26] G. Mention et al., Phys. Rev. D 83, therein]. 073006, 2011.

Volume xx, Number y Article Number : n. www.physedu.in Physics Education 16 dateline

[27] T. Mueller et al., Phys. Rev. C 83, 054615, 2011.

[28] D. Frekers et al., Phys. Lett. B 706, 134, 2011.

[29] S. Antusch et al., Unitarity of the Lep- tonic Mixing Matrix, JHEP 0610, 084, 2006.

[30] D. O. Caldwell, Neutrino Dark Matter, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-9530, USA, hep-ph/9902219.

[31] G. G. Raﬀelt, Neutrino Astrophysics At The cross roads, Proc. of Summer School in High Energy Physics & Cosmology at ICTP Italy, World Sc., 1998 [ hep- ph/9902271].

[32] K. Zuber, Neutrino Physics, CRC Press, ﬁrst edition, 2013.

Volume xx, Number y Article Number : n. www.physedu.in