DOCSLIB.ORG

Particle Dark Matter an Introduction Into Evidence, Models, and Direct Searches

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Particle Dark Matter An Introduction into Evidence, Models, and Direct Searches Lecture for ESIPAP 2016 European School of Instrumentation in Particle & Astroparticle Physics Archamps Technopole XENON1T January 25th, 2016 Uwe Oberlack Institute of Physics & PRISMA Cluster of Excellence Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz http://xenon.physik.uni-mainz.de Outline ● Evidence for Dark Matter: ▸ The Problem of Missing Mass ▸ In galaxies ▸ In galaxy clusters ▸ In the universe as a whole ● DM Candidates: ▸ The DM particle zoo ▸ WIMPs ● DM Direct Searches: ▸ Detection principle, physics inputs ▸ Example experiments & results ▸ Outlook Uwe Oberlack ESIPAP 2016 2 Types of Evidences for Dark Matter ● Kinematic studies use luminous astrophysical objects to probe the gravitational potential of a massive environment, e.g.: ▸ Stars or gas clouds probing the gravitational potential of galaxies ▸ Galaxies or intergalactic gas probing the gravitational potential of galaxy clusters ● Gravitational lensing is an independent way to measure the total mass (profle) of a foreground object using the light of background sources (galaxies, active galactic nuclei). ● Comparison of mass profles with observed luminosity profles lead to a problem of missing mass, usually interpreted as evidence for Dark Matter. ● Measuring the geometry (curvature) of the universe, indicates a ”fat” universe with close to critical density. Comparison with luminous mass: → a major accounting problem! Including observations of the expansion history lead to the Standard Model of Cosmology: accounting defcit solved by ~68% Dark Energy, ~27% Dark Matter and <5% “regular” (baryonic) matter. ● Other lines of evidence probe properties of matter under the infuence of gravity: ▸ the equation of state of oscillating matter as observed through fuctuations of the Cosmic Microwave Background (acoustic peaks). ▸ formation of structure in the universe, probing the velocity dispersion of (dark) matter. Uwe Oberlack ESIPAP 2016 3 The Problem of Missing Mass Uwe Oberlack ESIPAP 2016 4 Evidence for Dark Matter In Galaxies Scale: 1021 m (~10 5 lightyears) Spiral galaxies Dwarf Spheroidal galaxies M31, NASA Fornax David Malin, Anglo-Australian Observatory. Uwe Oberlack ESIPAP 2016 5 Our Galaxy The Milky Way Our view from inside the disk (in near infrared radiation) 2MASS Allsky survey Edge-on view (sketch) Uwe Oberlack ESIPAP 2016 6 Stellar Orbits Pearson Education Uwe Oberlack ESIPAP 2016 7 Evidence for Dark Matter in Spiral Galaxies Rotation curves (orbital velocity vs. galactocentric radius) remain fat well beyond the edge of the visible disk in spiral galaxies. Disk + DM Halo Disk only Rotation curves of nearby galaxies Rotation curve of the Milky Way (Sofue & Rubin ARAA 2001) (A. Klypin et. al, ApJ. 573, 2002) Uwe Oberlack ESIPAP 2016 8 Via Lactea 2 (2008) http://www.ucolick.org/~diemand/vl Dark Matter Halo Observer Uwe Oberlack ESIPAP 2016 9 MOND: Modifed Newtonian Dynamics Mordehai Milgrom 1983 Change Newton´s force law for low values of acceleration a: For large r, a << a0: For a circular orbit: so is independent of r. If, a >> a0: 1, so v remains ● MOND does well for rotation curves but does not explain the movement of galaxies in clusters or cosmological observations. ● MOND is a non-relativistic theory, phenomenological, and ad hoc. More sophisticated relativistic theory (e.g., TeVeS) also has difculty explaining cosmological data. Uwe Oberlack ESIPAP 2016 10 Local DM density from vertical motions Uwe Oberlack ESIPAP 2016 11 Evidence for Dark Matter in Galaxy Clusters • Orbital velocities of galaxies exceed escape velocity estimated from visible mass in galaxies (Zwicky 1933). • X-ray gas: pressure too great for visible mass. Traces gravitational potential. NOAO/Kitt Peak: Uson, Dale • Gravitational lensing: measures total NASA/CXC/IoA: Allen et al. mass distribution in galaxy clusters. Scale: ~1022 m (~106 lightyears) W. Couch, R. Ellis, NASA G. Kochanski, I. Dell'Antonio, T. Tyson, 2002 Uwe Oberlack ESIPAP 2016 12 Velocity dispersion in galaxy clusters Fritz Zwicky (1933) used the velocity dispersion of galaxies in the Coma cluster and the virial theorem 1 E = − E kin 2 pot to estimate the mass of the cluster MCluster. Comparing this mass to the luminosity of the galaxies in the cluster, using empirical relations between luminosity and mass for stars, he found: Mlum ~ 1/400 MCluster Something is missing : Dark Matter ? Helvetica Physica Acta 6 (1933), 110 Uwe Oberlack ESIPAP 2016 13 X-Ray Observations of Galaxy Clusters Baryonic matter in galaxy clusters is dominated by X-ray emitting hot gas. The temperature of the hot gas tells us the total cluster mass. 85% dark matter 13% hot gas Zwicky knew 2% stars only about this! This results from the assumption that the observed clusters are virialized, i.e., Epot = 2 Ekin Kinetic energy=thermal energy 1 2 3 m ⟨ v ⟩= k T 2 ¯ 2 virial with avg. particle mass m¯ ≈1.23mH Boltzmann constant: k=1.38065×10−23 J / K ⇒ Velocity dispersion: σ=√ ⟨ v2 ⟩ 3 k T 3 1 T σ= ≈1.4×10 km s− √ m¯ √ 108 K 3 −1 7 Uwe Oberlack ESIPAP 2016 σ∼10 km s ,T ∼(2−11)×1014 K Gravitational Lensing General Relativity: A massive object (e.g., a galaxy cluster) curves spacetime. Light follows geodesics. Hence a massive object acts as a gravitational lens for light from a distant source. Gravitational lensing measures the total mass enclosed by the light rays, independent of the type of matter. NASA/ESA Uwe Oberlack ESIPAP 2016 15 Gravitational Lensing: Strong Lensing NASA/ESA Gravitational lensing measures the total mass enclosed by the light rays, independent of the type of matter. Uwe Oberlack ESIPAP 2016 16 Weak Lensing ● Line of sight near galaxy cluster: strong lensing (long arcs) ● Further out: weaker distortions, but more abundant. → weak lensing ● Measure total mass distribution in galaxy clusters NASA HST Bullet cluster blue: total mass distribution from weak lensing NASA Uwe Oberlack ESIPAP 2016 17 MergingMerging GalaxyGalaxy Clusters:Clusters: MissingMissing massmass oror modificationmodification ofof gravity?gravity? D. Clowe et al., 2006 Bullet Cluster 18 Uwe Oberlack ESIPAP 2016 The Bullet Cluster ● “Bullet cluster” (z~0.3) is an ongoing merger of two galaxy clusters. ● Cores passed through each other ~100 million years ago (recent!). ● Weak lensing observations (blue) trace the total mass distribution. ● Known property of clusters: bulk of regular (baryonic) matter consists of hot intra- cluster gas. Stars contribute just a little. ● Chandra X-ray observations (pink) trace hot intracluster gas, i.e., most baryons. D. Clowe et al., Astrophys. J. 648 (2006) L109 ● Stars and Dark Matter are collisionless, whereas gas (plasma) experiences ram pressure. ● Mass cluster >> Mass gas ● Bulk of total mass ofset with respect to ● Gas is ofset with respect to total matter bulk of baryonic matter. distribution. ⇒Dark Matter! But: these systems are rare, dynamics ... and not modifed gravity. complicated, possible counter example, etc. Uwe Oberlack ESIPAP 2016 19 Scale: ~1026 m Planck Collab. arxiv:1303.5062 Evidence for Dark Matter (1010 lightyears) CMB Ω ≈ 5 Ω from Cosmology m b ● Cosmic Microwave Background. ▸ Uniformity at age 380,000 yr. ▸ Flatness of the universe ▸ Baryon density, etc. ● Supernovae as standard candles. ▸ Expansion history of the universe. ● Galaxy surveys (wide or deep) and Simulations of structure formation. ▸ Large scale structure. ▸ Early structure formation. First stars. Quasars and galaxies. ● Big Bang Nucleosynthesis and light element Dark Energy abundances observed in the early universe. Dark Matter ▸ Limit on baryon density, consistent Baryons with CMB. 68.3% ● Baryon Acoustic Oscillations 26.8% ▸ standard ruler ● ... 4.9% Uwe Oberlack ESIPAP 2016 20 Multipole Expansion of CMB WMAP after dipole subtraction Expansion in spherical l=2 harmonics: Pair correlation function: l=3 2 C (Δ T ) = l (l + 1) l Uwe Oberlack 2 π ESIPAP 2016 NASA/WMAP 21 CMB Power Spectrum & Baryon Density P. Schneider Relative strength of acoustic peaks provides Ωm and Ωb independently. Uwe Oberlack ESIPAP 2016 22 CMB as seen by Planck: Power Spectra Planck collaboration, arxiv:1303.5062 Uwe Oberlack ESIPAP 2016 23 → Dark Matter is non-baryonic. Uwe Oberlack ESIPAP 2016 24 Structures in galaxy maps look very similar to the ones found in models in which dark matter is “cold” (v ≪ c) and not interacting, supporting WIMPs as Dark Matter candidates. Uwe Oberlack ESIPAP 2016 25 Cold Dark Matter – Structure Formation V. Springel, C. S. Frenk, S. D. M. White Nature 440, 1137 (2006) Uwe Oberlack ESIPAP 2016 26 → Dark Matter is non-relativistic: cold, or at least not hot. Uwe Oberlack ESIPAP 2016 27 Non-baryonic Dark Matter or Alternative Theories of Gravity? CMB Ωm≈ 5 Ωb Planck 3rd peak only with Dark Matter ● Relative strength of acoustic peaks provides Ωm and Ωb independently. ● One can also test for alternative theories of gravitation (e.g., TeVeS): no alternative theory can do without Dark Matter. Uwe Oberlack ESIPAP 2016 28 Non-baryonic Dark Matter or Alternative Theories of Gravity? Matter power spectra SDSS TeVeS M D ΛC Dodelson, arXiv:1112.1320 Uwe Oberlack ESIPAP 2016 29 Outline ● Evidence for Dark Matter: ▸ The Problem of Missing Mass ▸ In galaxies ▸ In galaxy clusters ▸ In the universe as a whole ● DM Candidates: ▸ The DM particle zoo ▸ WIMPs ● DM Direct Searches: ▸ Detection principle, physics inputs ▸ Example experiments & results ▸ Outlook Uwe Oberlack ESIPAP 2016 30 What do we know about Dark Matter? ● Gravitationally interacting The Standard Model ► How we know
Recommended publications
  • Adrien Christian René THOB

    Adrien Christian René THOB

    THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MORPHOLOGY AND KINEMATICS OF GALAXIES AND ITS DEPENDENCE ON DARK MATTER HALO STRUCTURE IN SIMULATED GALAXIES Adrien Christian René THOB A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Liverpool John Moores University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. 26 April 2019 To my grand-parents, René Roumeaux, Christian Thob, Yvette Roumeaux (née Bajaud) and Anne-Marie Thob (née Léglise). ii Abstract Galaxies are among nature’s most majestic and diverse structures. They can play host to as few as several thousands of stars, or as many as hundreds of billions. They exhibit a broad range of shapes, sizes, colours, and they can inhabit vastly differing cosmic environments. The physics of galaxy formation is highly non-linear and in- volves a variety of physical mechanisms, precluding the development of entirely an- alytic descriptions, thus requiring that theoretical ideas concerning the origin of this diversity are tested via the confrontation of numerical models (or “simulations”) with observational measurements. The EAGLE project (which stands for Evolution and Assembly of GaLaxies and their Environments) is a state-of-the-art suite of such cos- mological hydrodynamical simulations of the Universe. EAGLE is unique in that the ill-understood efficiencies of feedback mechanisms implemented in the model were calibrated to ensure that the observed stellar masses and sizes of present-day galaxies were reproduced. We investigate the connection between the morphology and internal 9:5 kinematics of the stellar component of central galaxies with mass M? > 10 M in the EAGLE simulations. We compare several kinematic diagnostics commonly used to describe simulated galaxies, and find good consistency between them.
  • DARK MATTER and NEUTRINOS Arxiv:1711.10564V1 [Physics.Pop-Ph]

    DARK MATTER and NEUTRINOS Arxiv:1711.10564V1 [Physics.Pop-Ph]

    Physics Education 1 dateline DARK MATTER AND NEUTRINOS Gazal Sharma1, Anu2 and B. C. Chauhan3 Department of Physics & Astronomical Science School of Physical & Material Sciences Central University of Himachal Pradesh (CUHP) Dharamshala, Kangra (HP) INDIA-176215. [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] (Submitted 03-08-2015) Abstract The Keplerian distribution of velocities is not observed in the rotation of large scale structures, such as found in the rotation of spiral galaxies. The deviation from Keplerian distribution provides compelling evidence of the presence of non-luminous matter i.e. called dark matter. There are several astrophysical motivations for investigating the dark matter in and around the galaxy as halo. In this work we address various theoretical and experimental indications pointing towards the existence of this unknown form of matter. Amongst its constituents neutrino is one of the most prospective candidates. We know the neutrinos oscillate and have tiny masses, but there are also signatures for existence of heavy and light sterile neutrinos and possibility of their mixing. Altogether, the role of neutrinos is of great interests in cosmology and understanding dark matter. arXiv:1711.10564v1 [physics.pop-ph] 23 Nov 2017 1 Introduction revealed in 2013 that our Universe contains 68:3% of dark energy, 26:8% of dark matter, and only 4:9% of the Universe is known mat- As a human being the biggest surprise for us ter which includes all the stars, planetary sys- was, that the Universe in which we live in tems, galaxies, and interstellar gas etc.. This is mostly dark.
  • Dark Matter, Oscillations, Exotics Subgroup

    Dark Matter, Oscillations, Exotics Subgroup

    Dark matter from ZeV to aeV: 3rd IBS-MultiDark-IPPP Workshop Durham, November 2016 Juande ZZornozaornoza (IFIC, UV-CSIC) Introduction X-rays and sterile neutrinos Neutrino telescopes Results . Sun . Earth . Milky Way . Extra-galactic Future Summary The evidence for the existence Virial theorem of dark matter is very solid and, which is very important, at many different scales Rotation curves Comma Cluster Cosmic Microwave Background Bullet Cluster Gravitational Lensing + BNN, N-body simulations… We do not know what is dark matter, so it is hard to say which is the winning strategy: multi-front attack! PAMELA, AMS FERMI, MAGIC ANTARES, IceCube… Indirect detection XENON χ q, W+, Z… CDMS In any case: CoGENT -we want more than one DAMA “detection” +astrophysical ANAIS -results (constraints) of each … probes ( self- strategy are input for the others interaction of χ Directdetection q, W-, Z… DM affecting dark matter densities in Accelerators LHC galaxies…) Credit: Sky & Telescope / Gregg Dinderman X-ray astronomy (1-100 keV) differs from gamma ray astronomy in the detection strategy Atmosphere absorbs X-rays and fluxes are high, so observation is based on balloons and satellites X-rays cannot be focused by lenses, so focusing is based on total reflection (Wolter telescope) Projects: Chandra, XMM-Newton, Suzaku XMM-Newton: Large collecting area Simultaneous imaging and high resolution spectroscopy Monochromatic 3.5 keV photon line observed in data of XMM-Newton from 73 galaxy clusters Located within 50-100 eV of several known faint lines Interpreted as decay from sterile Bulbul, arxiv:1402.2301 neutrinos with ms=7.1 keV, which would be dark matter Boyarsky, arxiv:1402.4119 Also observed in Andromeda and Perseus Interpretation as sterile neutrino (sin2 (2θ)∼7x10-11) consistent with present constraints However, significant astrophysical unknowns involved (for instance, potassium XVIII line) Bulbul, arxiv:1402.2301 Boyarsky, arxiv:1402.4119 Astro-H Chandra Astro-H satellite (aka Hitomi), equipped with a X-ray spectrometer, was launched in Feb 2016.
  • José Ángel Villar Rivacoba Was ANAIS Spokesperson and Chair Professor of Atomic, Molecular and Nuclear Physics at the Theo

    José Ángel Villar Rivacoba Was ANAIS Spokesperson and Chair Professor of Atomic, Molecular and Nuclear Physics at the Theo

    24/10/2017 Direct Detection of Dark Matter and present status of ANAIS-112 experiment J. Amaré, I. Coarasa, S. Cebrián, C. Cuesta, E. García, M. Martínez, M.A. Oliván, Y. Ortigoza, A. Ortiz de Solórzano, J. Puimedón, A. Salinas, M.L. Sarsa, J.A. Villar✝, P. Villar In Memoriam In Memoriam • José Ángel Villar Rivacoba was ANAIS spokesperson and chair professor of Atomic, Molecular and Nuclear Physics at the Theoretical Physics Department of the University of Zaragoza • He passed away last August and we are deeply in sorrow 1 24/10/2017 In Memoriam In Memoriam • He was Bachelor and Doctor in Physics (Thesis supervised by Julio Morales) by the University of Zaragoza • He was always deeply involved in academic and research management activities in his University: • Dean of the Science Faculty at the University of Zaragoza (1992-2001) • Research Vice-Probost of the University of Zaragoza (2004-2008) • President of the Research Commission of the University of Zaragoza (2004-2008) • He was also strongly involved in scientific management at national and In Memoriam international level: • He was the coordinator of the national network of astroparticles (RENATA) • Member of the Executive Committee of the National Center for Physics of Astroparticles and Nuclear (CPAN) • Member of the general assembly and Joint Secretariat of the ApPEC Consortium • Organizer of numerous national and international congresses • Member of the Board and Science Assembly of ILIAS • Adviser to the successive Ministries responsible for Science and Technology, the Government
  • Astrophysical Uncertainties of Direct Dark Matter Searches

    Astrophysical Uncertainties of Direct Dark Matter Searches

    Technische Universit¨atM¨unchen Astrophysical uncertainties of direct dark matter searches Dissertation by Andreas G¨unter Rappelt Physik Department, T30d & Collaborative Research Center SFB 1258 “Neutrinos and Dark Matter in Astro- and Particlephysics” Technische Universit¨atM¨unchen Physik Department T30d Astrophysical uncertainties of direct dark matter searches Andreas G¨unter Rappelt Vollst¨andigerAbdruck der von der Fakult¨atf¨urPhysik der Technischen Universit¨at M¨unchen zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften genehmigten Dissertation. Vorsitzender: Prof. Dr. Lothar Oberauer Pr¨uferder Dissertation: 1. Prof. Dr. Alejandro Ibarra 2. Prof. Dr. Bj¨ornGarbrecht Die Dissertation wurde am 12.11.2019 bei der Technischen Universit¨at M¨unchen eingereicht und durch die Fakult¨atf¨urPhysik am 24.01.2020 angenommen. Abstract Although the first hints towards dark matter were discovered almost 100 years ago, little is known today about its properties. Also, dark matter has so far only been inferred through astronomical and cosmological observations. In this work, we therefore investi- gate the influence of astrophysical assumptions on the interpretation of direct searches for dark matter. For this, we assume that dark matter is a weakly interacting massive particle. First, we discuss the development of a new analysis method for direct dark matter searches. Starting from the decomposition of the dark matter velocity distribu- tion into streams, we present a method that is completely independent of astrophysical assumptions. We extend this by using an effective theory for the interaction of dark matter with nucleons. This allows to analyze experiments with minimal assumptions on the particle physics of dark matter. Finally, we improve our method so that arbitrarily strong deviations from a reference velocity distribution can be considered.
  • A Derivation of Modified Newtonian Dynamics

    A Derivation of Modified Newtonian Dynamics

    Journal of The Korean Astronomical Society http://dx.doi.org/10.5303/JKAS.2013.46.2.93 46: 93 ∼ 96, 2013 April ISSN:1225-4614 c 2013 The Korean Astronomical Society. All Rights Reserved. http://jkas.kas.org A DERIVATION OF MODIFIED NEWTONIAN DYNAMICS Sascha Trippe Department of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea E-mail : [email protected] (Received February 14, 2013; Revised March 20, 2013; Accepted March 29, 2013) ABSTRACT Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) is a possible solution for the missing mass problem in galac- tic dynamics; its predictions are in good agreement with observations in the limit of weak accelerations. However, MOND does not derive from a physical mechanism and does not make predictions on the transitional regime from Newtonian to modified dynamics; rather, empirical transition functions have to be constructed from the boundary conditions and comparisons with observations. I compare the formalism of classical MOND to the scaling law derived from a toy model of gravity based on virtual massive gravitons (the “graviton picture”) which I proposed recently. I conclude that MOND naturally derives from the “graviton picture” at least for the case of non-relativistic, highly symmetric dynamical systems. This suggests that – to first order – the “graviton picture” indeed provides a valid candidate for the physical mechanism behind MOND and gravity on galactic scales in general. Key words : Gravitation — Galaxies: kinematics and dynamics −10 −2 1. INTRODUCTION where x = ac/am, am ≈ 10 ms is Milgrom’s con- stant, and µ(x)isa transition function with the asymp- “ It is worth remembering that all of the discus- totic behavior µ(x) → 1 for x ≫ 1 and µ(x) → x for sion [on dark matter] so far has been based on x ≪ 1.
  • The Contents of the Universe

    The Contents of the Universe

    Ay 127! The Contents of the Universe 0.5 % Stars and other visible stuff Supernovae alone ⇒ Accelerating expansion ⇒ Λ > 0 CMB alone ⇒ Flat universe ⇒ Λ > 0 Any two of SN, CMB, LSS ⇒ Dark energy ~70% Also in agreement with the age estimates (globular clusters, nucleocosmochronology, white dwarfs) Today’s Best Guess Universe Age: Best fit CMB model - consistent with ages of oldest stars t0 =13.82 ± 0.05 Gyr Hubble constant: CMB + HST Key Project to -1 -1 measure Cepheid distances H0 = 69 km s Mpc € Density of ordinary matter: CMB + comparison of nucleosynthesis with Lyman-a Ωbaryon = 0.04 € forest deuterium measurement Density of all forms of matter: Cluster dark matter estimate CMB power spectrum 0.31 € Ωmatter = Cosmological constant: Supernova data, CMB evidence Ω = 0.69 for a flat universe plus a low € Λ matter density € The Component Densities at z ~ 0, in critical density units, assuming h ≈ 0.7 Total matter/energy density: Ω0,tot ≈ 1.00 From CMB, and consistent with SNe, LSS From local dynamics and LSS, and Matter density: Ω0,m ≈ 0.31 consistent with SNe, CMB From cosmic nucleosynthesis, Baryon density: Ω0,b ≈ 0.045 and independently from CMB Luminous baryon density: Ω0,lum ≈ 0.005 From the census of luminous matter (stars, gas) Since: Ω0,tot > Ω0,m > Ω0,b > Ω0,lum There is baryonic dark matter There is non-baryonic dark matter There is dark energy The Luminosity Density Integrate galaxy luminosity function (obtained from large redshift surveys) to obtain the mean luminosity density at z ~ 0 8 3 SDSS, r band: ρL = (1.8 ± 0.2) 10 h70 L/Mpc 8 3 2dFGRS, b band: ρL = (1.4 ± 0.2) 10 h70 L/Mpc Luminosity To Mass Typical (M/L) ratios in the B band along the Hubble sequence, within the luminous portions of galaxies, are ~ 4 - 5 M/L This includes some dark matter - for pure stellar populations, (M/L) ratios should be slightly lower.
  • Modified Newtonian Dynamics, an Introductory Review

    Modified Newtonian Dynamics, an Introductory Review

    Modified Newtonian Dynamics, an Introductory Review Riccardo Scarpa European Southern Observatory, Chile E-mail [email protected] Abstract. By the time, in 1937, the Swiss astronomer Zwicky measured the velocity dispersion of the Coma cluster of galaxies, astronomers somehow got acquainted with the idea that the universe is filled by some kind of dark matter. After almost a century of investigations, we have learned two things about dark matter, (i) it has to be non-baryonic -- that is, made of something new that interact with normal matter only by gravitation-- and, (ii) that its effects are observed in -8 -2 stellar systems when and only when their internal acceleration of gravity falls below a fix value a0=1.2×10 cm s . Being completely decoupled dark and normal matter can mix in any ratio to form the objects we see in the universe, and indeed observations show the relative content of dark matter to vary dramatically from object to object. This is in open contrast with point (ii). In fact, there is no reason why normal and dark matter should conspire to mix in just the right way for the mass discrepancy to appear always below a fixed acceleration. This systematic, more than anything else, tells us we might be facing a failure of the law of gravity in the weak field limit rather then the effects of dark matter. Thus, in an attempt to avoid the need for dark matter many modifications of the law of gravity have been proposed in the past decades. The most successful – and the only one that survived observational tests -- is the Modified Newtonian Dynamics.
  • X-Ray Shapes of Elliptical Galaxies and Implications for Self-Interacting Dark Matter

    X-Ray Shapes of Elliptical Galaxies and Implications for Self-Interacting Dark Matter

    Prepared for submission to JCAP X-Ray Shapes of Elliptical Galaxies and Implications for Self-Interacting Dark Matter A. McDaniel,a;bc;1 T., Jeltema,b;c S., Profumob;c aDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Kinard Lab of Physics, Clemson, SC, 29634-0978, USA bDepartment of Physics, University of California, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, California, 95064, USA cSanta Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, California, 95064, USA E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract. Several proposed models for dark matter posit the existence of self-interaction processes that can impact the shape of dark matter halos, making them more spherical than the ellipsoidal halos of collisionless dark matter. One method of probing the halo shapes, and thus the strength of the dark matter self-interaction, is by measuring the shape of the X-ray gas that traces the gravitational potential in relaxed elliptical galaxies. In this work we identify a sample of 11 relaxed, isolated elliptical galaxies and measure the ellipticity of the gravitating matter using X-ray images from the XMM-Newton and Chandra telescopes. We explore a variety of different mass configurations and find that the dark matter halos of these galaxies have ellipticities around 0:2 0:5. While we find non-negligible scatter in the ≈ − ellipticity distribution, our results are consistent with some degree of self-interaction at the scale of σ=m 1 cm2/g, yet they also remain compatible with a cold dark matter scenario. ∼ We additionally demonstrate how our results can be used to directly constrain specific dark matter models and discuss implications for current and future simulations of self-interacting dark matter models.
  • IUPAP Report 41A

    IUPAP Report 41A

    IUPAP Report 41a A Report on Deep Underground Research Facilities Worldwide (updated version of August 8, 2018) Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 3 SNOLAB 4 SURF: Sanford Underground Research Facility 10 ANDES: AGUA NEGRA DEEP EXPERIMENT SITE 16 BOULBY UNDERGROUND LABORATORY 18 LSM: LABORATOIRE SOUTERRAIN DE MODANE 21 LSC: LABORATORIO SUBTERRANEO DE CANFRANC 23 LNGS: LABORATORI NAZIONALI DEL GRAN SASSO 26 CALLIO LAB 29 BNO: BAKSAN NEUTRINO OBSERVATORY 34 INO: INDIA BASED NEUTRINO OBSERVATORY 41 CJPL: CHINA JINPING UNDERGROUND LABORATORY 43 Y2L: YANGYANG UNDERGROUND LABORATORY 45 IBS ASTROPHYSICS RESEARCH FACILITY 48 KAMIOKA OBSERVATORY 50 SUPL: STAWELL UNDERGROUND PHYSICS LABORATORY 53 - 2 - __________________________________________________INTRODUCTION LABORATORY ENTRIES BY GEOGRAPHICAL REGION Deep Underground Laboratories and their associated infrastructures are indicated on the following map. These laboratories offer low background radiation for sensitive detection systems with an external users group for research in nuclear physics, astroparticle physics, and dark matter. The individual entries on the Deep Underground Laboratories are primarily the responses obtained through a questionnaire that was circulated. In a few cases, entries were taken from the public information supplied on the lab’s website. The information was provided on a voluntary basis and not all laboratories included in this list have completed construction, as a result, there are some unavoidable gaps. - 3 - ________________________________________________________SNOLAB (CANADA) SNOLAB 1039 Regional Road 24, Creighton Mine #9, Lively ON Canada P3Y 1N2 Telephone: 705-692-7000 Facsimile: 705-692-7001 Email: [email protected] Website: www.snolab.ca Oversight and governance of the SNOLAB facility and the operational management is through the SNOLAB Institute Board of Directors, whose member institutions are Carleton University, Laurentian University, Queen’s University, University of Alberta and the Université de Montréal.
  • The Current Status and Planned Developments for Deep Underground Astro-Particle Physics Science Facilities

    The Current Status and Planned Developments for Deep Underground Astro-Particle Physics Science Facilities

    12th International Conference on Topics in Astroparticle and Underground Physics (TAUP 2011) IOP Publishing Journal of Physics: Conference Series 375 (2012) 042059 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/375/4/042059 The Current Status and Planned Developments for Deep Underground Astro-particle Physics Science Facilities N.J.T.Smith SNOLAB, 1039 Regional Road 24, Lively, Ontario, P3Y 1N2, Canada E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. The rigorous radiation background constraints imposed by several studies in particle and astro-particle physics, such as Galactic dark matter searches, man-made, terrestrial, solar and supernova neutrino studies and 0νββ-decay studies, require deep underground science facilities to afford shielding from penetrating cosmic rays and their secondary by-products. New threads of research focused on deep sub-surface biology, chemistry, geology and engineering have also been developing rapidly at several sites, benefitting from the significant investment in underground access and infrastructure developed. In addition to planned, or completed, expansion at several of these deep underground facilities, additional new facilities are in early stages of construction or well advanced planning. These developments provide significant additional capability to these fields of study. This paper summarises the developments at these facilities, focused on those extremely deep uderground laboratories where expansion is underway or planned. 1. Introduction Searches for rare decay channels or weak interactions in particle or astro-particle physics studies require the observation of rare events in dedicated detector systems. These rare events need to be observed against the significant backgrounds created by cosmic-ray and radioactive- contaminant generated signals. To enable the observation of these exquisite signal events, experiments must therefore be operated in the quiet environment afforded by shielded facilities in deep underground laboratories.
  • Results from the DAMA/LIBRA Experiment R Bernabei, P Belli, F Cappella Et Al

    Results from the DAMA/LIBRA Experiment R Bernabei, P Belli, F Cappella Et Al

    Journal of Physics: Conference Series OPEN ACCESS Related content - DAMA/LIBRA results and perspectives Results from the DAMA/LIBRA experiment R Bernabei, P Belli, F Cappella et al. - Performances of the new high quantum To cite this article: R Bernabei et al 2010 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 203 012003 efficiency PMTs in DAMA/LIBRA R Bernabei, P Belli, A Bussolotti et al. - ANAIS status report J Amaré, S Borjabad, S Cebrián et al. View the article online for updates and enhancements. Recent citations - Flavored dark matter in direct detection experiments and at the LHC Jennifer Kile and Amarjit Soni - Singlet Majorana fermion dark matter, DAMA, CoGeNT, and CDMS-II C. de S. Pires et al - Effect of low mass dark matter particles on the Sun Marco Taoso et al This content was downloaded from IP address 170.106.202.226 on 30/09/2021 at 09:16 Topics in Astroparticle and Underground Physics (TAUP 2009) IOP Publishing Journal of Physics: Conference Series 203 (2010) 012003 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/203/1/012003 Results from the DAMA/LIBRA experiment RBernabei1,2, P Belli 2, F Cappella 3,4,RCerulli5,CJDai6,A d’Angelo 3,4,HLHe6, A Incicchitti 4, H H Kuang 6,XHMa6,F Montecchia 2,7, F Nozzoli 1,2,DProsperi3,4, X D Sheng6 and Z P Ye6,8 1 Dip. di Fisica, Universit`a di Roma “Tor Vergata”, I-00133 Rome, Italy 2 INFN, sez. Roma “Tor Vergata”, I-00133 Rome, Italy 3 Dip. di Fisica, Universit`a di Roma “La Sapienza”, I-00185 Rome, Italy 4 INFN, sez.