DOCSLIB.ORG

Worringer on Imber, 'The Ottoman Empire, 1300-1650: the Structure of Power'

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Worringer on Imber, 'The Ottoman Empire, 1300-1650: the Structure of Power' H-Levant Worringer on Imber, 'The Ottoman Empire, 1300-1650: The Structure of Power' Review published on Saturday, May 1, 2004 Colin Imber. The Ottoman Empire, 1300-1650: The Structure of Power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002. xiv + 405 pp. $27.95 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-333-61386-3; $19.95 (paper), ISBN 978-0-333-61387-0. Reviewed by Renee Worringer (School of History, Philosophy, Religion, and Classics, University of Queensland) Published on H-Levant (May, 2004) Until recently the Ottoman historian was at a marked disadvantage when teaching an undergraduate course on the Ottoman Empire's rise and interactions with Europe. There was an absence of suitable general histories explaining the particulars behind the emergence of the Ottoman principality on the Byzantine-Seljuk frontier; its subsequent expansion into the Balkans and into Anatolia, culminating in the Ottoman conquest of Constantinople in 1453; and ultimately Ottoman ascension to the status of world empire. As a result, the Ottomanist was forced to assemble myriad collections of book chapters, articles, and essays from different publications into an accessible form. At times the chronology of events leading to the establishment of the Ottoman state was lost in the scramble to collect materials explicating the minutiae of Ottoman governing structures and dynastic power. Other times, historiographical debates and the effects of earlier Western and Turkish nationalist approaches to Ottoman history had to be ignored to convey basic information about what happened when, what battles were fought, or what territories were annexed and by which reigning Ottoman Sultan. Several long-overdue monographs have now been published in an attempt to respond to this deficiency in the field. In addition to Daniel Goffman's dynamic and engaging The Ottoman Empire and Early Modern Europe (2002), the scholar now has Colin Imber's very readable and well-organizedThe Ottoman Empire, 1300-1650: The Structure of Power (2002) at his or her disposal. Imber describes his task very clearly in his introduction: to write a general Ottoman history that would "serve to introduce the non-specialist to the field, and to provide a context which makes it possible to read the specialist works" (pp. xiii). In addition, he hopes to give Ottomanist specialists themselves "a straightforward chronology of events which has hitherto been lacking" (pp. xiii-xiv). Thus, the first quarter of the book is devoted to a useful, if densely packed, chronological summary of Ottoman historical development that draws on Imber's previous scholarship on the early Ottoman period (for example, his The Ottoman Empire 1300-1461 [1990]). His intimate knowledge of original sources and the use of linguistic interpretation result in a reexamination of the accuracy and historical meaning of terms such as ghazi (pp. 120-121). What could have been merely a dry list of the many Ottoman conquests and defeats over time is instead a vibrant discussion of the multiculturalism of the Ottoman Empire. It describes the Empire from its inception as a heterodox frontier society taking advantage of political rivalries among Byzantine claimants to the throne, local Balkan rulers, and other Muslim principalities in Anatolia--and whose warrior-leaders were Turkish and nominally Muslim--to its later form as an imperial state influenced by the historical legacies of Turco-Mongolian, Perso-Islamic and Byzantine traditions, which incorporated aspects of these into a new administrative apparatus. In this chronology he delves into topics such as the political nature of Citation: H-Net Reviews. Worringer on Imber, 'The Ottoman Empire, 1300-1650: The Structure of Power'. H-Levant. 01-22-2014. https://networks.h-net.org/node/7801/reviews/8250/worringer-imber-ottoman-empire-1300-1650-structure-power Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 1 H-Levant the Ottoman elite as a predominantly Muslim and Turkish-speaking class whose origins were often non-Muslim and non-Turkish (p. 3); Ottoman sürgün or deportation policies towards various groups in the Empire as a management strategy designed to create stability in the realm; and the violent attempt by Timur to reassert Islamized Mongol overlordship and governing patterns in Anatolia through the defeat of Ottoman forces at Ankara in 1402, resulting in the capture and subsequent death of Sultan Bayezid, the division of his territory among his sons, and Ottoman civil war lasting two roughly decades. Imber presents the Ottoman reemergence after this interregnum in a subsection titled "Conquest and Consolidation, 1451-1512," a period in which the Ottoman state definitively acquired an imperial capital after its siege of Constantinople, expanded its territories, and put in place its choices for administrative organization as an expression of power (pp. 27-28). From here the reader embarks upon a detailed account of Ottoman expansion further into Europe and the Mediterranean where it warred with Christian land and naval powers, as well as toward the Islamic heartlands, encountering the Mamluk realm centered in Cairo, and the Turcomankizilbas tribes on its Eastern flank, the clients of the fledgling Safavid state on its Iranian frontier. Imber argues, with clearly presented evidence, that in this era the Ottomans had to deal simultaneously with pretenders to the throne and rebellions in provincial areas as it undertook a campaign to improve military technology. What results in the sixteenth century is "the Apogee of Empire, 1512-1590" (p. 44), during which Ottoman Sultan Selim I defeated the Safavids (1514) and subdued the Mamluk Sultanate (1517). These successes launched what would shortly become his heir Süleyman the Magnificent's (r. 1520-1566) role as world emperor. In addition to Süleyman's campaigns, that essentially converted the Mediterranean into an Ottoman lake and allowed the Sultan to rival the Habsburg dynast as Holy Roman Emperor, his father's "acquisition from the Mamluks of the three Holy Cities of Mecca, Medina, and Jerusalem gave the Ottoman Sultan primacy among Islamic monarchs, and bolstered his claim to be the sole defender of Islamic orthodoxy against Safavid heresy" (p. 48). The chronology highlights Ottoman achievements during Süleyman's forty-six-year reign and the years immediately following. The next subsection, "The Ottoman Times of Trouble, 1590-1650," rounds out the chapter with a discussion of multiple Ottoman crises starting at the turn of the seventeenth century. These were, first, military in nature and then, in later decades, dynastic, before order and territory were temporarily restored under Sultan Murad IV (d. 1640). Imber purports to end the chronology in 1650, which he views as "the close of a period of crisis which brought an end to the Empire's expansion and brought changes to the structure of its institutions" (p. xiv). The last paragraphs summarize the accession to the throne of the child-Sultan Mehmed IV (r. 1648-1687), whose grandmother Kösem and mother Turhan were engaged in the dynastic politics of what was previously known in pejorative terms as "The Sultanate of the Women." It is remarked that Turhan's surrender of power to the astute Köprülü Grand Vezirs did not stave off the eventual downturn in Ottoman fortunes marked by the second failed siege of Vienna in 1683 and the Treaty of Carlowitz (1699) that was to officially recognize such losses. Imber then delves into the specifics of Ottoman structures of power in subsequent chapters. In chapter 2, Imber explores the Ottoman dynasty, reproductive politics, and the evolution of succession practices, integrating many of the findings of Leslie Peirce's specialized work on the Ottoman imperial period in her The Imperial Harem: Women and Sovereignty in the Ottoman Empire (1993), while incorporating his own knowledge of early Ottoman marital alliances, the succession struggles between sons, the implementation of a policy of royal fratricide, and allegiances with political figures Citation: H-Net Reviews. Worringer on Imber, 'The Ottoman Empire, 1300-1650: The Structure of Power'. H-Levant. 01-22-2014. https://networks.h-net.org/node/7801/reviews/8250/worringer-imber-ottoman-empire-1300-1650-structure-power Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 2 H-Levant inside and outside the dynasty to elevate power potential among rival heirs apparent. His presentation of the development of traditions to legitimate the ascension and continuing reign of a Sultan, whether Turco-Mongolian and Islamic attempts to link the Ottomans genealogically with their Oghuz forefathers of "Abrahamic" extraction (pp. 122-124) or the increased usage of Ottoman titulature reflecting the Sultan's capacity as the inheritor of Roman, Persian, Islamic, and Mongol civilizations (pp. 125-127) stimulates the interest of students and historians of Europe and the Islamic world alike. Chapter 3 discusses recruitment into the Ottoman ruling apparatus, the origins and functioning of the devshirme levy that produced "Slaves of the Porte" and the Janissary corps. Chapter 4 describes the Palace system, its physical layout in different periods, the arrangement of the dynastic household, its servants and their education, and an in-depth review of the development, composition, and duties of the various offices of the Ottoman Imperial Council. Chapter 5 compares the administration and personnel of revenue-generating provincial territories. Imber
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Historia Scribere 13 (2021)
    historia scribere 13 (2021) The Beginnings of an Empire. The Transformation of the Ottoman State into an Empire, demonstrated at the example of Grand Vizier Mahmud Pasha’s life and accomplishments Vera Flatz Kerngebiet: Neuzeit eingereicht bei: Yasir Yilmaz, MA PhD und Univ.-Prof. Dr. Stefan Ehrenpreis eingereicht im: WiSe 2019/20 Rubrik: Seminar-Arbeit Abstract The Beginnings of an Empire. The Transformation of the Ottoman State into an Empire, demonstrated at the example of Grand Vizier Mahmud Pasha’s life and accomplishments The following seminar paper deals with Grand Vizier Mahmud Pasha’s life and the processes that turned an Ottoman principality into the Ottoman Empire. Starting with Sultan Mehmed’s II appointment in 1444, important practic- es such as the nomination of a grand vizier changed significantly. Moreover, Mehmed II built a new palace which reflected the new imperial self-percep- tion, a new code of law was installed, and the empire was centralised. All these developments become especially visible in the life of Grand Vizier Mahmud Pasha Angelovic. The paper examines secondary literature as well as contem- porary sources of Kritobolous and Ibn Khaldun. Sources on Mahmud Pasha’s life are rare and need to be analysed with caution as his posthumous legend influenced the production of literature about his life. 1. Introduction Mahmud Pasha Angelovic, born at the beginning of the 15th century in a town in Ser- bia, became one of the most influential grand viziers of the Ottoman Empire. How did that happen? In 1453, Mehmed II conquered Constantinople and made it the capital of one of the biggest empires of the early modern period.
    [Show full text]
  • Review the Following Terms: CHINA: the OTTOMAN EMPIRE
    Warm-Up: Review the following terms: CHINA: • The Middle Kingdom • The Taiping Uprising • Hong Xiuquan • The Opium Wars • The Treaty of Nanjing (1842) • Spheres of Influence • “Self-strengthening” • Society of Righteous and Harmonious Fists (Boxer Rebellion) THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE: • “The strong sword of Islam” • “The sick man of Europe” • Devshirme • Sultan • Ulama • Janissaries • Tanzimat • Young Ottomans • Islamic modernism • Young Turks Ch. 19: Comparing China and the Ottoman Empire Questions 1. In what ways were China and the Ottoman Empire similar prior to 1800? 2. In what ways were China and the Ottoman Empire different prior to 1800? 3. In what ways was China’s experience from 1750-1900 similar to the Ottoman Empire’s experience during the same time period? 4. In what ways was China’s experience from 1750-1900 different to the Ottoman Empire’s experience during the same time period? 5. In what ways was reform in China in the late 19th/early 20th centuries similar to reform in the Ottoman Empire during the same time period? 6. In what ways was reform in China in the late 19th/early 20th centuries different than reform in the Ottoman Empire during the same time period? 1. In what ways were China and the Ottoman Empire similar prior to 1800? ● Both were highly successful, well-established civilizations prior to 1800 ● Both had territories that included their respective cultural heartlands and expanded into new areas over time ● Both had distinct cultures heavily dependent on philosophy/religion (Islam in the Ottoman Empire, Confucianism/Daoism/Buddhism
    [Show full text]
  • Sabiha Gökçen's 80-Year-Old Secret‖: Kemalist Nation
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO ―Sabiha Gökçen‘s 80-Year-Old Secret‖: Kemalist Nation Formation and the Ottoman Armenians A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Communication by Fatma Ulgen Committee in charge: Professor Robert Horwitz, Chair Professor Ivan Evans Professor Gary Fields Professor Daniel Hallin Professor Hasan Kayalı Copyright Fatma Ulgen, 2010 All rights reserved. The dissertation of Fatma Ulgen is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ Chair University of California, San Diego 2010 iii DEDICATION For my mother and father, without whom there would be no life, no love, no light, and for Hrant Dink (15 September 1954 - 19 January 2007 iv EPIGRAPH ―In the summertime, we would go on the roof…Sit there and look at the stars…You could reach the stars there…Over here, you can‘t.‖ Haydanus Peterson, a survivor of the Armenian Genocide, reminiscing about the old country [Moush, Turkey] in Fresno, California 72 years later. Courtesy of the Zoryan Institute Oral History Archive v TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page……………………………………………………………....
    [Show full text]
  • Turkish Plastic Arts
    Turkish Plastic Arts by Ayla ERSOY REPUBLIC OF TURKEY MINISTRY OF CULTURE AND TOURISM PUBLICATIONS © Republic of Turkey Ministry of Culture and Tourism General Directorate of Libraries and Publications 3162 Handbook Series 3 ISBN: 978-975-17-3372-6 www.kulturturizm.gov.tr e-mail: [email protected] Ersoy, Ayla Turkish plastic arts / Ayla Ersoy.- Second Ed. Ankara: Ministry of Culture and Tourism, 2009. 200 p.: col. ill.; 20 cm.- (Ministry of Culture and Tourism Publications; 3162.Handbook Series of General Directorate of Libraries and Publications: 3) ISBN: 978-975-17-3372-6 I. title. II. Series. 730,09561 Cover Picture Hoca Ali Rıza, İstambol voyage with boat Printed by Fersa Ofset Baskı Tesisleri Tel: 0 312 386 17 00 Fax: 0 312 386 17 04 www.fersaofset.com First Edition Print run: 3000. Printed in Ankara in 2008. Second Edition Print run: 3000. Printed in Ankara in 2009. *Ayla Ersoy is professor at Dogus University, Faculty of Fine Arts and Design. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 5 Sources of Turkish Plastic Arts 5 Westernization Efforts 10 Sultans’ Interest in Arts in the Westernization Period 14 I ART OF PAINTING 18 The Primitives 18 Painters with Military Background 20 Ottoman Art Milieu in the Beginning of the 20th Century. 31 1914 Generation 37 Galatasaray Exhibitions 42 Şişli Atelier 43 The First Decade of the Republic 44 Independent Painters and Sculptors Association 48 The Group “D” 59 The Newcomers Group 74 The Tens Group 79 Towards Abstract Art 88 Calligraphy-Originated Painters 90 Artists of Geometrical Non-Figurative
    [Show full text]
  • Fall of Constantinople] Pmunc 2018 ​ ​ Contents
    [FALL OF CONSTANTINOPLE] PMUNC 2018 ​ ​ CONTENTS Letter from the Chair and CD………....…………………………………………....[3] Committee Description…………………………………………………………….[4] The Siege of Constantinople: Introduction………………………………………………………….……. [5] Sailing to Byzantium: A Brief History……...………....……………………...[6] Current Status………………………………………………………………[9] Keywords………………………………………………………………….[12] Questions for Consideration……………………………………………….[14] Character List…………………...………………………………………….[15] Citations……..…………………...………………………………………...[23] 2 [FALL OF CONSTANTINOPLE] PMUNC 2018 ​ ​ LETTER FROM THE CHAIR Dear delegates, Welcome to PMUNC! My name is Atakan Baltaci, and I’m super excited to conquer a city! I will be your chair for the Fall of Constantinople Committee at PMUNC 2018. We have gathered the mightiest commanders, the most cunning statesmen and the most renowned scholars the Ottoman Empire has ever seen to achieve the toughest of goals: conquering Constantinople. This Sultan is clever and more than eager, but he is also young and wants your advice. Let’s see what comes of this! Sincerely, Atakan Baltaci Dear delegates, Hello and welcome to PMUNC! I am Kris Hristov and I will be your crisis director for the siege of Constantinople. I am pleased to say this will not be your typical committee as we will focus more on enacting more small directives, building up to the siege of Constantinople, which will require military mobilization, finding the funds for an invasion and the political will on the part of all delegates.. Sincerely, Kris Hristov 3 [FALL OF CONSTANTINOPLE] PMUNC 2018 ​ ​ COMMITTEE DESCRIPTION The year is 1451, and a 19 year old has re-ascended to the throne of the Ottoman Empire. Mehmed II is now assembling his Imperial Court for the grandest city of all: Constantinople! The Fall of Constantinople (affectionately called the Conquest of Istanbul by the Turks) was the capture of the Byzantine Empire's capital by the Ottoman Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • I TURKEY and the RESCUE of JEWS DURING the NAZI ERA: a RE-APPRAISAL of TWO CASES; GERMAN-JEWISH SCIENTISTS in TURKEY & TURKISH JEWS in OCCUPIED FRANCE
    TURKEY AND THE RESCUE OF JEWS DURING THE NAZI ERA: A REAPPRAISAL OF TWO CASES; GERMAN-JEWISH SCIENTISTS IN TURKEY & TURKISH JEWS IN OCCUPIED FRANCE by I. Izzet Bahar B.Sc. in Electrical Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, 1974 M.Sc. in Electrical Engineering, Bosphorus University, Istanbul, 1977 M.A. in Religious Studies, University of Pittsburgh, 2006 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Art and Sciences in partial fulfillment Of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Cooperative Program in Religion University of Pittsburgh 2012 i UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences This dissertation was presented by I. Izzet Bahar It was defended on March 26, 2012 And approved by Clark Chilson, PhD, Assistant Professor, Religious Studies Seymour Drescher, PhD, University Professor, History Pınar Emiralioglu, PhD, Assistant Professor, History Alexander Orbach, PhD, Associate Professor, Religious Studies Adam Shear, PhD, Associate Professor, Religious Studies Dissertation Advisor: Adam Shear, PhD, Associate Professor, Religious Studies ii Copyright © by I. Izzet Bahar 2012 iii TURKEY AND THE RESCUE OF JEWS DURING THE NAZI ERA: A RE-APPRAISAL OF TWO CASES; GERMAN-JEWISH SCIENTISTS IN TURKEY & TURKISH JEWS IN OCCUPIED FRANCE I. Izzet Bahar, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2012 This study aims to investigate in depth two incidents that have been widely presented in literature as examples of the humanitarian and compassionate Turkish Republic lending her helping hand to Jewish people who had fallen into difficult, even life threatening, conditions under the racist policies of the Nazi German regime. The first incident involved recruiting more than one hundred Jewish scientists and skilled technical personnel from German-controlled Europe for the purpose of reforming outdated academia in Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • Christians and Jews in the Ottoman Empire: the Abridged Edition
    EXCERPTED FROM Christians and Jews in the Ottoman Empire: The Abridged Edition edited by Benjamin Braude Copyright © 2014 ISBNs: 978-1-58826-889-1 hc 978-1-58826-865-5 pb 1800 30th Street, Suite 314 Boulder, CO 80301 USA telephone 303.444.6684 fax 303.444.0824 This excerpt was downloaded from the Lynne Rienner Publishers website www.rienner.com Contents Preface vii List of Abbreviations ix Note on Transliteration x 1 Introduction 1 Benjamin Braude 2 Transformation of Zimmi into Askerî 51 İ. Metin Kunt 3 Foundation Myths of the Millet System 65 Benjamin Braude 4 The Rise of the Armenian Patriarchate of Constantinople 87 Kevork B. Bardakjian 5 Ottoman Policy Toward the Jews and Jewish Attitudes Toward the Ottomans During the Fifteenth Century 99 Joseph R. Hacker 6 The Greek Millet in the Ottoman Empire 109 Richard Clogg 7 The Dual Role of the Armenian Amira Class Within the Ottoman Government and the Armenian Millet 133 Hagop Barsoumian 8 Foreign Merchants and the Minorities in Istanbul During the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries 147 Robert Mantran 9 The Transformation of the Economic Position of the Millets in the Nineteenth Century 159 Charles Issawi v vi Contents 10 The Millets as Agents of Change in the Nineteenth-Century Ottoman Empire 187 Roderic H. Davison 11 The Acid Test of Ottomanism: The Acceptance of Non-Muslims in the Late Ottoman Bureaucracy 209 Carter V. Findley 12 Communal Conflict in Ottoman Syria During the Reform Era: The Role of Political and Economic Factors 241 Moshe Ma‘oz 13 Communal Conflict in Nineteenth-Century Lebanon 257 Samir Khalaf 14 Unionist Relations with the Greek, Armenian, and Jewish Communities of the Ottoman Empire, 1908 –1914 287 Feroz Ahmad 15 The Political Situation of the Copts, 1798 –1923 325 Doris Behrens-Abouseif Selected Bibliography 347 About the Contributors 355 Index 357 About the Book 374 1 Introduction Benjamin Braude Thirty years ago the first edition of this book appeared.
    [Show full text]
  • Mighty Guests of the Throne Note on Transliteration
    Sultan Ahmed III’s calligraphy of the Basmala: “In the Name of God, the All-Merciful, the All-Compassionate” The Ottoman Sultans Mighty Guests of the Throne Note on Transliteration In this work, words in Ottoman Turkish, including the Turkish names of people and their written works, as well as place-names within the boundaries of present-day Turkey, have been transcribed according to official Turkish orthography. Accordingly, c is read as j, ç is ch, and ş is sh. The ğ is silent, but it lengthens the preceding vowel. I is pronounced like the “o” in “atom,” and ö is the same as the German letter in Köln or the French “eu” as in “peu.” Finally, ü is the same as the German letter in Düsseldorf or the French “u” in “lune.” The anglicized forms, however, are used for some well-known Turkish words, such as Turcoman, Seljuk, vizier, sheikh, and pasha as well as place-names, such as Anatolia, Gallipoli, and Rumelia. The Ottoman Sultans Mighty Guests of the Throne SALİH GÜLEN Translated by EMRAH ŞAHİN Copyright © 2010 by Blue Dome Press Originally published in Turkish as Tahtın Kudretli Misafirleri: Osmanlı Padişahları 13 12 11 10 1 2 3 4 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without permission in writing from the Publisher. Published by Blue Dome Press 535 Fifth Avenue, 6th Fl New York, NY, 10017 www.bluedomepress.com Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Available ISBN 978-1-935295-04-4 Front cover: An 1867 painting of the Ottoman sultans from Osman Gazi to Sultan Abdülaziz by Stanislaw Chlebowski Front flap: Rosewater flask, encrusted with precious stones Title page: Ottoman Coat of Arms Back flap: Sultan Mehmed IV’s edict on the land grants that were deeded to the mosque erected by the Mother Sultan in Bahçekapı, Istanbul (Bottom: 16th century Ottoman parade helmet, encrusted with gems).
    [Show full text]
  • A BRIEF History of Serbia
    A BRIEF history of Serbia From the Foundation to the Ottomans To Look for: • Look for the following themes in history (write down examples) • 1-political intrigue • (using greater powers to get something, switching sides) • 2-example of tolerance • (getting along w/ other ethnicities/religions) • 3-examples of infighting • (Serbians fighting Serbians for power) • 4-examples of a ‘Holy’ empire (leaders doing things for God, Serbia being a faithful servant to God) Serbia today Kingdom of Serbia, (1555) greatest extent A little Background on the Serbs • 1st Serbian Kingdom began around 1036 in the area of modern day Montenegro. • It was started by Stefan Vojislav, who renounced his allegiance to the emperor in Constantinople and moved his support to Rome and began to bring neighboring Serbian tribes under his control • (Playing ruling powers off one another) Zeta Serbs become Orthodox • -the land became known as Zeta and was 1st ruled by a Catholic • -civil wars and power struggles broke and power shifted to Raska where Sefan Nemanja founded a dynasty and that would rule for the next 200 yrs. and created an expanding Serbia • -The Nemanjas united the Serbs and gave them a Serbian identity centered around the church (Stefan had become a prisoner of Emperor Emanuel in Constantinople and had been introduced to Byzantine culture, when he returned he was determined to bring back to the Serbs The Nemanjan Serbian Kingdom in pink The Nemanjas • -As the Bulgarian state grew in the Balkans, they did not capture the Nemanja’s capital of Raska • the
    [Show full text]
  • Science Versus Religion: the Influence of European Materialism on Turkish Thought, 1860-1960
    Science versus Religion: The Influence of European Materialism on Turkish Thought, 1860-1960 Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Serdar Poyraz, M.A. Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2010 Dissertation Committee: Carter V. Findley, Advisor Jane Hathaway Alan Beyerchen Copyright By Serdar Poyraz 2010 i Abstract My dissertation, entitled “Science versus Religion: The Influence of European Materialism on Turkish Thought, 1860-1960,” is a radical re-evaluation of the history of secularization in the Ottoman Empire and Turkey. I argue that European vulgar materialist ideas put forward by nineteenth-century intellectuals and scientists such as Ludwig Büchner (1824-1899), Karl Vogt (1817-1895) and Jacob Moleschott (1822-1893) affected how Ottoman and Turkish intellectuals thought about religion and society, ultimately paving the way for the radical reforms of Kemal Atatürk and the strict secularism of the early Turkish Republic in the 1930s. In my dissertation, I challenge traditional scholarly accounts of Turkish modernization, notably those of Bernard Lewis and Niyazi Berkes, which portray the process as a Manichean struggle between modernity and tradition resulting in a linear process of secularization. On the basis of extensive research in modern Turkish, Ottoman Turkish and Persian sources, I demonstrate that the ideas of such leading westernizing and secularizing thinkers as Münif Pasha (1830-1910), Beşir Fuad (1852-1887) and Baha Tevfik (1884-1914) who were inspired by European materialism provoked spirited religious, philosophical and literary responses from such conservative anti-materialist thinkers as Şehbenderzade ii Ahmed Hilmi (1865-1914), Said Nursi (1873-1960) and Ahmed Hamdi Tanpınar (1901- 1962).
    [Show full text]
  • Legitimizing the Ottoman Sultanate: a Framework for Historical Analysis
    LEGITIMIZING THE OTTOMAN SULTANATE: A FRAMEWORK FOR HISTORICAL ANALYSIS Hakan T. K Harvard University Why Ruled by Them? “Why and how,” asks Norbert Elias, introducing his study on the 18th-century French court, “does the right to exercise broad powers, to make decisions about the lives of millions of people, come to reside for years in the hands of one person, and why do those same people persist in their willingness to abide by the decisions made on their behalf?” Given that it is possible to get rid of monarchs by assassination and, in extreme cases, by a change of dynasty, he goes on to wonder why it never occurred to anyone that it might be possible to abandon the existing form of government, namely the monarchy, entirely.1 The answers to Elias’s questions, which pertain to an era when the state’s absolutism was at its peak, can only be found by exposing the relationship between the ruling authority and its subjects. How the subjects came to accept this situation, and why they continued to accede to its existence, are, in essence, the basic questions to be addressed here with respect to the Ottoman state. One could argue that until the 19th century political consciousness had not yet gone through the necessary secularization process in many parts of the world. This is certainly true, but regarding the Ottoman population there is something else to ponder. The Ottoman state was ruled for Most of the ideas I express here are to be found in the introduction to my doc- toral dissertation (Bamberg, 1997) in considering Ottoman state ceremonies in the 19th century.
    [Show full text]
  • The Making of Sultan Süleyman: a Study of Process/Es of Image-Making and Reputation Management
    THE MAKING OF SULTAN SÜLEYMAN: A STUDY OF PROCESS/ES OF IMAGE-MAKING AND REPUTATION MANAGEMENT by NEV ĐN ZEYNEP YELÇE Submitted to the Institute of Social Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Sabancı University June, 2009 © Nevin Zeynep Yelçe 2009 All Rights Reserved To My Dear Parents Ay şegül and Özer Yelçe ABSTRACT THE MAKING OF SULTAN SÜLEYMAN: A STUDY OF PROCESS/ES OF IMAGE-MAKING AND REPUTATION MANAGEMENT Yelçe, Nevin Zeynep Ph.D., History Supervisor: Metin Kunt June 2009, xv+558 pages This dissertation is a study of the processes involved in the making of Sultan Süleyman’s image and reputation within the two decades preceding and following his accession, delineating the various phases and aspects involved in the making of the multi-layered image of the Sultan. Handling these processes within the framework of Sultan Süleyman’s deeds and choices, the main argument of this study is that the reputation of Sultan Süleyman in the 1520s was the result of the convergence of his actions and his projected image. In the course of this study, main events of the first ten years of Sultan Süleyman’s reign are conceptualized in order to understand the elements employed first in making a Sultan out of a Prince, then in maintaining and enhancing the sultanic image and authority. As such, this dissertation examines the rhetorical, ceremonial, and symbolic devices which came together to build up a public image for the Sultan. Contextualized within a larger framework in terms of both time and space, not only the meaning and role of each device but the way they are combined to create an image becomes clearer.
    [Show full text]