Western Avenue Corridor

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Western Avenue Corridor Palos Verdes Drive N WESTERN AVENUE CORRIDOR VISION PLAN 75% DRAFT The preparation of this report has been financed in part through grant[s] from the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S. Department of Transportation. W Summerland Ave May 22, 2013 This is a project for the City of Rancho Palos Verdes with funding provided by the Southern California Association of Governments’ (SCAG) Compass Blueprint Program. Compass Blueprint assists Southern Californiaa cities and other organizations in evaluating planning options and stimulating development consistent with the region’s goals. Compass Blueprint tools support visioning efforts, infill analyses, economic and policy analyses, and marketing and communication programs. The preparation of this report has been financed in part through grant(s) from the Federal Highway Administration (FHW A) and the Federal Transit Administration (FT A) through the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) in accordance with the provisions under the Metropolitan Planning Program as set forth in Section 104(f) of Title 23 of the U.S. Code. The contents of this report reflect the views of the author who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of SCAG, DOT or the State of California. This report does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. SCAG shall not be responsible for the City’s future use or adaptation of the report. Looking north on Western Avenue at W Park Western Drive Table of Contents 0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 PROCESS 1.1 Goals 1.2 Public Outreach 1.3 Vision Committee 2 ANALYSIS 2.1 What is the Corridor? 2.2 Economics and Demographics 2.3 Public Realm and Streetscape 2.4 Mobility (Bicycle and Transit) 2.5 Branding and Signage 2.6 Precedents of Great Streets 3 RECOMMENDATIONS 3.1 Summary of Recommendations 3.2 Northern Segment 3.3 Middle Segment 3.4 Southern Segment 3.5 Mobility (Bicycle) 3.6 Mobility (Transit) 4 IMPLEMENTATION 5.1 Next Steps 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ‘WESTERN PLAZA’ ‘THE TERRACES SHOPPING CENTER’ US Post Office Tabacco Sport Medicine 31 DESTINATIONS be considered acceptable today. Further, the study corridor lacks special Liquor Starlight Cinema Pizza Place Cleanners Tae Kwan Do Executive Summary Bakery Medi spa Carls Jr. L Star Chinese H&R Block Nails Saloon places – plazas, parks, and other hubs of community life. These are Food Market Pet Grooming Bully Fitness Japanese Eatery In 2012, the City of Rancho Palos Verdes embarked on a community-led Papa Johns Massages Fed Ex Massage Ros & Nails GNC Baskin Robins Marshalls Nancy Nails Dodson Chinese Food Dentistry Trader Joe’s Day Spa essential for a successful, if not great, boulevard. Chiropractor K Williams Realty Cleanners Middle Auto Body Shop IHop effort to improve Western Avenue for residents, businesses, and visitors Farmers Westview Escrow Muscle Market School Oil Change Medicine Center America’s Tire Co. Loan Office Remax Others Cleaners Centinela Pet Dentistry Americas Kobe Grill ‘PALOS VERDES PLAZA’ Steak House Physicians Auto Parts alike. This document summarizes and illustrates the shared vision, ideas, Best Value Inn Health Food Village Subs Rus Drapery Vac Sew & Carpet El Pollo Loco The message heard resoundingly from stakeholders and the community Fish & Chips Chevron Maui Chicken Good Night Hair Cut Domino’s Pizza Mattres Green Hills Denny’s Green Hills and process that underlie the year-long planning effort. Memorial Park Jack in the Box Asaka Grill 14 Florist was to improve storefronts, quality of the public realm, and perception of Destinations Eastview Marie Callender’s Destinations13 Townhouse 16 4 Destinations Self Storage Destinations the corridor. It was felt that the corridor also needed to create diversity Eastview Park The significance of this effort, for the City of Rancho Palos Verdes and Destinations7 13 Peck Destinations Smart & Final Park Alberstons Mc Donalds 24 Strip Mall 11-12 in its retail, access, and mobility options. If the needs of locals were Stix 17 Destinations Vendors/Retail US Bank Destinations the adjoining communities, cannot be overstated. It will shape Western Shell Destinations5 Carrows Restaurant Wells Fargo AT&T Del Taco Bank Starbucks Fantastic Sams addressed by providing amenities and improving the Avenue’s image, Christ Lutheran School Defense Support Lomita Little Blinds & Drapes Avenue for the next generation and its recommendations will impact Tarragona Plaza Point San Pedro (DFSP) League ‘PARK PLAZA’ Office Taxco Opus Bank Coco’s Bakery Restaurant Milestone Mortage Shell Gasoline Animal Hospital Chiropractor surely visitors and business activity would follow thereafter. Ross Office Farmers Mary the quality of life of residents and visitors, the potential of property CVS US Bank Star ‘HARBOR COVE’ 0 DESTINATIONS Office Depot of the Atomic Boxing Ralphs Tanning Sea HS Petco Del Taco Circus Donuts Taper holdings, the provision of additional amenities and infrastructure, and the Radio Shack Beauty Supply Acupunture Elementary The core recommendation of this vision is to update the nature of Henry’s Farmers Market Jacaranda Gourmet Framing Gallery School Subway Hussey Insurance 1hr. Photo of the Avenue. Chase Dentistry overall image Countrywide Harbor Health SP Science development along the corridor and reverse the relationship Global Gifts Harbor Lights Escrow Center School Tuesday Morning School of Music and Art Jewelry Store that buildings and surface parking have with the The study area constitutes a small segment of Western Avenue, one of 80 DESTINATIONS street. New developments should be built along the property line the longest streets in Southern California. At 27.5 miles, it could well the frontier it represented, and Western Avenue today finds itself creating a strong street wall. Surface parking should not be located host the Los Angeles Marathon with room to spare. It is also the only occupying the heart rather than the periphery of the metropolitan region. adjacent to the sidewalk and should not serve as the arrival experience corridor in the region that connects the mountains (at Griffith Park) to It has become the pre-eminent north-south boulevard of of the corridor. With buildings located at the property edge on the the sea (at White’s Point). In its long journey to the bluffs of San Pedro, the region, and the only one that matches the iconic significance of the sidewalk, active, visitor-serving uses should be located at ground level. Western Avenue traverses some of the most iconic neighborhoods and region’s celebrated east-west boulevards – Sunset, Hollywood, Wilshire, With regards to each of the three segments of the corridor, the following communities in the region, successively adopting their identities, and Venice, Pico and Olympic. recommendations apply: serving as a lasting symbol of Southern California’s diversity and vitality. The cities that host Western Avenue include Los Angeles, Westmont, Western Avenue is the primary corridor of the South Southern Segment (Summerland to Caddington) Gardena, Torrance, Lomita, and Rancho Palos Verdes, as well as the Bay, Peninsula, and San Pedro communities. This study unincorporated communities of Westmont and West Athens. focuses on a two-mile stretch from Palos Verdes Drive North on the • This is the commercial heart of the study area, and its north to Peck Park at Summerland Avenue on the south. This segment experience and image needs updating to sustain its success. Western Avenue has an anachronistic name. Early in the twentieth of Western Avenue has historically provided services, amenities, century it did indeed serve as the western boundary of the city of Los • Reverse the relationship that buildings and surface parking connectivity, and residential opportunities to the region. Angeles. The city and the region have, since, decisively blown through have with the street. New developments should be built along The study corridor, for most of its length, constitutes the municipal the property line creating a strong street wall. Parking should Rolling Hills Estates boundary between the cities of Rancho Palos Verdes (on the west) and be located at the rear of the parcel and/or consolidated in Los Angeles (on the east). It provides a diversity of uses with commercial strategically located structures. City of Rancho Palos Verdes being concentrated on the south, a mix of commercial and residential • Active, visitor-serving uses should be located at the ground level. uses between Toscanini and John Montgomery Drives, and institutional City of Lomita uses located at the north end. Western Avenue is by no means • Sidewalks widths should be 15-feet at a minimum with WESTERN AVENUE homogenous. It provides a multitude of amenities to a multitude of users. streetscape (vegetation, furniture, lighting, and pedestrian SUMMERLAND AVE amenities) that promote a vibrant street life. PALOS VERDES DR The corridor is, however, dated. Its patterns of development City of Los Angeles are representative of a time and approach long past. The commercial • Opportunities ot create outdoors spaces and special places cluster on the south end of the study area is auto oriented; with a notably should be a priority on all new redevelopments. poor pedestrian experience. The residential uses in the middle and north • The Terraces parcel is a key redevelopment opportunity and, if 2.3 miles/45-min walk segment turn their backs to the street and do not contribute to the programmed and designed sensitively, can serve as the catalyst street’s vitality. Neither commercial nor residential developments would 6 WESTERN AVENUE VISION PLAN - 75% DRAFT for positive transformation up and down the corridor. storage infrastructure of the Defense Fuel Support Point (DFSP) repeatedly and decisively preferred precedents that exhibited these characteristics. The reality is that undoing a generation of development Middle Segment (Caddington to John Montgomery) San Pedro.
Recommended publications
  • Metro Bus and Metro Rail System
    Approximate frequency in minutes Approximate frequency in minutes Approximate frequency in minutes Approximate frequency in minutes Metro Bus Lines East/West Local Service in other areas Weekdays Saturdays Sundays North/South Local Service in other areas Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Limited Stop Service Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Special Service Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Approximate frequency in minutes Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Weekdays Saturdays Sundays 102 Walnut Park-Florence-East Jefferson Bl- 200 Alvarado St 5-8 11 12-30 10 12-30 12 12-30 302 Sunset Bl Limited 6-20—————— 603 Rampart Bl-Hoover St-Allesandro St- Local Service To/From Downtown LA 29-4038-4531-4545454545 10-12123020-303020-3030 Exposition Bl-Coliseum St 201 Silverlake Bl-Atwater-Glendale 40 40 40 60 60a 60 60a 305 Crosstown Bus:UCLA/Westwood- Colorado St Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve 3045-60————— NEWHALL 105 202 Imperial/Wilmington Station Limited 605 SANTA CLARITA 2 Sunset Bl 3-8 9-10 15-30 12-14 15-30 15-25 20-30 Vernon Av-La Cienega Bl 15-18 18-20 20-60 15 20-60 20 40-60 Willowbrook-Compton-Wilmington 30-60 — 60* — 60* — —60* Grande Vista Av-Boyle Heights- 5 10 15-20 30a 30 30a 30 30a PRINCESSA 4 Santa Monica Bl 7-14 8-14 15-18 12-18 12-15 15-30 15 108 Marina del Rey-Slauson Av-Pico Rivera 4-8 15 18-60 14-17 18-60 15-20 25-60 204 Vermont Av 6-10 10-15 20-30 15-20 15-30 12-15 15-30 312 La Brea
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation/LAX Metro Rail Station BBB3, BCT109, C6, R3, R6 69 U LAX Employee V
    metro.net LAX Airport Area Connections Destinations Lines Stops Scale One Unit:1/4 Mile S E V Y V P W A A 10 Aviation/LAX Metro Rail Station BBB3, BCT109, C6, R3, R6 69 U LAX Employee V E A L W MORLEY ST A T S C University V Parking Lot D 1 1 Metro Local Stop A S Century Bl 117 5 E T N D A of West A C E A Crenshaw District 42, 42A, 40 (Late Night) # W H Post L S ESTWAY A L MetroLos LocalAngeles D I E E 1 1 E O;ce and Rapid Stop S 5 10 I Culver City C6, R6 LI B NC V S OL L T Culver City Transit Center C6, R6 5 10 N U E P R VITAE ST 1 Metro Rapid Stop E OR PKWY ARB Downtown Los Angeles 42, 42A, CE438, 40 (Late Night) D B S LAX City Bus Center L V Super 8 Motel Metro Rapid Line A El Segundo – Downtown BCT109 B26 LAX Parking V INSET 1 LAX Parking Lot C A at LAX Lot C El Segundo Offi ce Parks 232, 625, T8 AC389 Metro Rail93RD Station ST 93RD ST A BCT Bus service C T8 1 17 109 111 & Entrance FREE Florence Av 111 7 V N 94TH ST to Terminals A A Lot C Shuttle 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 L Hermosa Beach BCT109 26 Information Information To LAX L Metro Green Line 9 4 E TH ST V Terminals Hollywood Park 117 A5 B A 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 Y 1 Parking 42 BBB3 BBB3 C6 232 N Imperial Hwy 120 4 D E 40 (Owl) R3 R3 R6 N N L 95TH ST R O (NB) (SB) T 9 E 5 S Inglewood 111, 117 57 O TH ST R Civic Building J B E V F V L A 96TH ST L A E LA County Superior Court 625, MAX2, MAX3, MAX3X 9 B Hotel Building LAX City Bus Center (LAX Lot C) BBB3, BCT109, C6, R3, R6 2 5 E 9 DG ST 6 DR IDSON I T DAV BR Shuttle C 96TH H ST LAX City Bus Center Other Building La Tijera Bl 42, 42A Terminal SEE
    [Show full text]
  • THE TRANSIT ADVOCATE Quarterly Basis
    How to join SO.CA.TA: Yearly dues are $30.00 cates. In all other cases, permission must be ($12.00 low income). Dues are prorated on a secured from the copyright holder. THE TRANSIT ADVOCATE quarterly basis. Disclaimer: The Southern California Transit Submission of materials: ALL materials for the Advocates is not affiliated with any governmental Newsletter of the Southern California Transit Advocates TRANSIT ADVOCATE newsletter go to Andrew agency or transportation provider. Names and March 2012 Vol. 20, No. 03 Novak at P.O. Box 2383, Downey California 90242 logos of agencies appear for information and or to [email protected]. Please enclose a self reference purposes only. addressed stamped envelope for returns. SO.CA.TA officers, 2012 Newsletter deadlines are the Fridays a week President: Nate Zablen before SO.CA.TA meetings, at 6:00 PM Pacific Vice President: Kent Landfield time, unless otherwise announced. Recording Secretary: Edmund Buckley Executive Secretary: Dana Gabbard Opinions: Unless clearly marked as "Editorial" or Treasurer: Dave Snowden "Position Paper", all written material within, Directors at Large: Ken Ruben including all inserted flyers and postcards, are the J.K. Drummond expressed opinions of the authors and not Joe Dunn necessarily that of the Southern California Transit ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Advocates. Newsletter Editor: Andrew Novak Newsletter Prod. Mgr: Dana Gabbard Copyright: © 2012 Southern California Transit Webmaster: Charles Hobbs Advocates. Permission is freely granted to repro- th th duce/reprint ORIGINAL articles from the Transit NEXT SO.CA.TA MEETINGS : Mar 10 and April 14 at Angelus Plaza, 4th Floor, 255 S. Hill, Los Angeles Advocate, provided credit is given to both the au- thor and the Southern California Transit Advo- March 2012 — Issue 232 Southern California Transit Advocates 3010 Wilshire #362 Los Angeles, CA 90010 45¢ First 213-388-2364 Class http://www.socata.net Postage [email protected] FIRST CLASS MAIL Inside This Issue: Metro NABI 8092 at CMF on February 25, 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Pass Program (EZ Transit Pass) ______Summary of Policy 17
    Regional Pass Program (EZ Transit Pass) ______________________________________________________________________________ Summary of Policy 17. Santa Clarita Transit 18. Santa Fe Springs MetroExpress The purpose of the Regional EZ Transit 19. Santa Monica Big Blue Bus Pass program is to provide a low 20. South Pasadena Gold Link technology, low-cost, immediately 21. Torrance Transit implementable program, so that transit patrons in Los Angeles County are able to Historical Perspective benefit from seamless transfers in advance of the implementation of the In January 1999, Board adopted a motion Universal Fare System (UFS). directing staff to begin discussions with municipal operators with the objective of The price of the Monthly Regional Pass developing a consensus around a package was set at $58, and Elderly and Disabled of policy changes that would improve $29. The price for Zone premium was set regional services for bus riders, operators, at $15 per zone increment, and Elderly and labor. One of the elements to be and Disabled Zone premium at $7.50. included in that package was to establish All operators sell the pass from their an integrated regional pass and fare current outlets and transit stores, and they system to better serve our customer. market the pass through existing An Operator Taskforce was established programs or through joint marketing consisting of General Managers of the efforts. Each operator is reimbursed at the local transit systems and agency rate of its current average fare per Operations to develop a regional pass boarding multiplied by the operator’s program. The taskforce developed an Regional Pass boardings. implementation plan, a work program, The EZ Transit Pass Program currently major milestones, and implementation consists of 17 transit operators, including schedule and timeline.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Bus & Metro Rail System
    Metro Bus & Metro Rail System Map Metro Local & Limited Lines to Santa Clarita LA County Metro Liner Service Metro Express Lines Metro Shuttles & Circulators Metro Rapid Lines to Santa Clarita Olive View-UCLA Approximate frequency in minutes and Antelope Valley Medical Center Approximate frequency in minutes Approximate frequency in minutes Approximate frequency in minutes Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Approximate frequency in minutes '&% H>BH=6L Weekdays Saturdays Sundays * 236 Line Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Weekdays Saturdays Sundays CE409 224 234 Line Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve SC8 7A:9HD:290 634 Orange 4-5 10 10-20 11-12 10-20 11-12 10-20 Line Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Line Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Line Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve El Cariso 2 4-10 9-12 15-30 12-14 15-30 15-25 20-30 Regional 439 30-45 40-60 60b 60b 60 60 60b 603 10-12 12 30 20-30 20-30 20 30 704 8-12 15 18b 12-18 18b 15-25 18b 4 8-15 15-16 15-30 13-20 15-30 15-30 15-30 County Park 442 25 - - - - - - 605 10 15-20 30a 30 30a 30 30a 705 10-20 20 20 - - - - 234 H6NG: 10 7-15 15-30 15-30 12-20 30-60 15-30 30-60 236 7DG9:C GDM;DG9 LA Mission 444 10-30 60 60a 60 60a 60 60a 607 35 - - - - - - 710 8-10 20 20a 20 20a - - SC8 <A:CD6@H 14 12-25 20 20-60 15-20 20-60 15-30 20-60 H6C;:GC6C9DG9224 College 445 30 60 30-60 60 60a 60 60a 608 60 60 - - - - - 711 9-10 20 12-20 15-20 25 20 25 =J776G9 16 2-6 7-8 10-30 6-10 10-30 8-20 12-30 290 446 25-40 60c 60 60c 60 60c 60 611 11-35 40 30-50 30-40 30-50 30-40 30-50 714
    [Show full text]
  • Flores V. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
    Case 8:03-cv-00820-JVS-AN'i Document 56 Filed 09/24/04 Page 1 of 43 Page ID #:113 1 Paula D. Pearlman (SBN 109038) FILED-SOUTHERN DIVISION Eve Hill (SBN 202178) CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT 2 WESTERN LAW CENTER FOR DISABILITY RIGHTS 3 919 South Albany Street SEP 2 A2004 Los Angeles, California 90015 4 Tel: (213) 736-1031 5 Mark D. Rosenbaum (SBN 59940) 41370) Peter J. Eliasberg (SBN 189110) Ira A Weinreb (SBN 1 · 828) 6 ACLU FOUNDATION PARKER, MILLIKEN, CLARK, OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA O'HARA & SAMUELIAN 7 1616 Beverly Blvd. 333 S. Hope Street, 27th Floor Los An~eles, California 90026 Los Angeles, California 90071-1488 8 Tel: (2 3) 977-9500 Tel: (213) 683-6500 9 Maria lriarte-Abdo (SBN 150704) Lloyd W. Pellman (SBN 54295) Michelle Uzeta (SBN 164402) Alan K. Terakawa (SBN 75122) 10 PROTECTION AND ADVOCACY, OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL INC. One Gateway Plaza- 24th Floor 11 3580 Wilshire Blvd., #902 Los Angeles, California 90012 Los Angeles, California 90010-2512 Tel: (213) 922-2520 12 Tel: (213) 427-8747 Attorneys for Defendant MTA 13 Attorneys for Plaintiffs James G. Jones (SBN 43449) Martin B. Snyder (SBN 78253) 14LL-O__.....D~GE;::-;:0~';:: JONES & LESTER, LLP 445 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2700 Los Angeles, California 90071 ' . .-j • Tel: 16 ' ( ~ (213) 627-8149 17 · . 'SEP ll ~004 · Attorneys for Defendant Access Services 18 19 STATES DISTRICT COURT 20 R THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 21 22 NADINE FLORES, et al., CASE NO. SACV 03-820 JVS (ANx) 23 Plaintiffs, v.
    [Show full text]
  • THE TRANSIT ADVOCATE Quarterly Basis
    How to join SO.CA.TA: Yearly dues are $30.00 cates. In all other cases, permission must be ($12.00 low income). Dues are prorated on a secured from the copyright holder. THE TRANSIT ADVOCATE quarterly basis. Disclaimer: The Southern California Transit Submission of materials: ALL materials for the Advocates is not affiliated with any governmental Newsletter of the Southern California Transit Advocates TRANSIT ADVOCATE newsletter go to Andrew agency or transportation provider. Names and July 2013 Vol. 21, No. 7 Novak at P.O. Box 2383, Downey California 90242 logos of agencies appear for information and or to [email protected]. Please enclose a self reference purposes only. addressed stamped envelope for returns. SO.CA.TA officers, 2013 Newsletter deadlines are the Fridays a week President: Nate Zablen before SO.CA.TA meetings, at 6:00 PM Pacific Vice President: Kent Landfield time, unless otherwise announced. Recording Secretary: Edmund Buckley Executive Secretary: Dana Gabbard Opinions: Unless clearly marked as "Editorial" or Treasurer: Dave Snowden "Position Paper", all written material within, Directors at Large: Ken Ruben including all inserted flyers and postcards, are the J.K. Drummond expressed opinions of the authors and not Craig Weingarten necessarily that of the Southern California Transit ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Advocates. Newsletter Editor: Andrew Novak Newsletter Prod. Mgr: Dana Gabbard Copyright: © 2013 Southern California Transit Webmaster: Charles Hobbs Advocates. Permission is freely granted to repro- th th duce/reprint ORIGINAL articles from the Transit NEXT SO.CA.TA MEETINGS : July 13 and Aug 10 at Angelus Plaza, 4th Floor, 255 S. Hill, Los Angeles Advocate, provided credit is given to both the au- thor and the Southern California Transit Advo- July 2013 — Issue 248 Southern California Transit Advocates 3010 Wilshire #362 Los Angeles, CA 90010 46¢ First 213.388.2364 Class http://www.socata.net Postage [email protected] FIRST CLASS MAIL Inside This Issue: Municipal Area Express (MAX) RE 530 at the Avia- • Bulletin Board (pg.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation and Circulation
    3.12 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 1 3.12.1 Introduction 2 This section describes the environmental setting for transportation and circulation, 3 including marine transportation, within the PMPU area, identifies applicable 4 regulations, and analyzes the potential impacts that could result from implementing 5 the proposed Program. Mitigation measures and the significance of impacts after 6 mitigation also are described. 7 The transportation analysis includes eight freeway/roadway segments and 34 key 8 intersections that would be used by truck and automobile traffic to gain access to and 9 from the PMPU area. These include the nearest Congestion Management Program 10 (CMP) monitoring stations, assessed in conformance with Los Angeles County 11 Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA) CMP guidelines (LACMTA 2010). 12 3.12.2 Environmental Setting 13 3.12.2.1 Ground Transportation 14 The PMPU serves as a long-range plan to establish policies and guidelines for future 15 development within the coastal zone boundary of the Port. In general, the PMPU area is 16 bounded by the community of Wilmington to the north, lands surrounding the 17 Consolidated Slip to the northeast, lands surrounding the Cerritos Channel and City of 18 Los Angeles boundary to the east, Los Angeles Harbor to the south, and the community 19 of San Pedro to the west. 20 Access to and from the Port is provided by a network of freeways and arterial routes, 21 as shown on Figure 3.12-1. The freeway network consists of the Artesia Freeway 22 (State route [SR]-91), Harbor Freeway (I-110), Long Beach Freeway (I-710), San 23 Diego Freeway (I-405), and the Terminal Island Freeway (SR-103/ SR-47).
    [Show full text]
  • City of El Segundo Circulation Element of the General Plan
    CITY OF EL SEGUNDO CIRCULATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN City ofEl Segundo Circulation Element Prepared for: City of El Segundo Planning and Building Safety Department 350 Main Street El Segundo, CA 90245 September, 2004 El Segundo General Plan 4. Circulation Element Table of Contents page Introduction 4-1 Summary of Existing Conditions 4-2 Future Conditions 4-12 Master Plan of Streets 4-19 Alternative Modes of Travel 4-30 Goals, Objectives, and Policies 4-44 Goal C1: Provision for a Safe, Convenient, and Cost Effective Circulation System 4-44 Goal C2: Provisions for Alternative Modes of Transportation 4-47 Goal C3: Development of Circulation Policies that are Consistent with other City Policies 4-51 Goal C4: Compliance with all Federal, State, and Regional Regulations 4-53 4. Circulation Element 4. Circulation Element Introduction The circulation system is one of the most important of all urban systems in determining the form and quality of the El Segundo environment. The circulation modes used, location of routes, operational policies and the operating levels of service influence the nature of urban development, the physical organization of the City, and can enhance or limit the social and economic activity within the City. Purpose and Authority The purpose of the Circulation Element is to assist the City in providing a safe, convenient, and efficient circulation system. The Circulation Element identifies a system capable of responding to growth occurring consistent with the policies and Land Use Plan presented in the Land Use Element. The Circulation Element identifies physical improvements that will be needed to attain the Circulation goals and objectives, as well as alternative techniques to improve the City's circulation system.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Transportation
    1 Section 3.7 2 Ground Transportation 3 SECTION SUMMARY 4 This section describes existing ground transportation within the Port and surrounding area, and addresses 5 the potential impacts that could result from implementation of the proposed Project or an alternative. The 6 proposed Project would improve the container-handling efficiency of the existing YTI Terminal, and add 7 additional operational track to the TICTF, thereby increasing the throughput capacity of the terminal from 8 1,692,000 TEUs annually to 1,913,000 TEUs annually by 2026. The increase in capacity of the terminal 9 would increase truck trips and rail activity, thereby potentially increasing congestion on area roadways 10 and at rail crossings. 11 Section 3.7, Ground Transportation, provides the following: 12 . A description of existing levels of traffic in the Port area; 13 . a discussion on the methodology used to determine whether the proposed Project or 14 alternatives would result in an impact on ground transportation; 15 . an impact analysis of both the proposed Project and alternatives; and 16 . a description of any mitigation measures proposed to reduce any potential impacts, as 17 applicable. 18 Key Points of Section 3.7: 19 The proposed Project would make infrastructure improvements to an existing container terminal, and its 20 operations would be consistent with other uses and container terminals in the proposed Project area. The 21 alternatives evaluated included the No Project Alternative, the No Federal Action Alternative, and a 22 Reduced Project Alternative. The analysis determined that construction and operation of the proposed 23 Project or an alternative would not result in significant ground transportation impacts to roadways, rail, or 24 other modes of ground transportation under CEQA or NEPA, and that no mitigation would be required.
    [Show full text]
  • Final PEROW Report, Appendices
    Pacific Electric ROW/West Santa Ana Branch Corridor Alternatives Analysis Report Alternatives Analysis Final APPENDICES A. Urban Design Report (Submitted Separately) B. Travel Demand Modeling C. Air Quality and Climate Change Technical Results D. Capital Cost Analysis E. Operating and Cost Estimate and Financial Analysis F. Outreach Meeting Record G. Public Comment Log June 29, 2012 Pacific Electric ROW/West Santa Ana Branch Corridor Alternatives Analysis Report Alternatives Analysis Final Appendix A: Urban Design Report (Submitted Separately) June 29, 2012 Pacific Electric ROW/West Santa Ana Branch Corridor Alternatives Analysis Report Alternatives Analysis Final Appendix B: Travel Demand Modeling Report June 29, 2012 Pacific Electric ROW/West Santa Ana Branch Alternatives Analysis Travel Demand Modeling Report Final March 2012 Pacific Electric ROW/West Santa Ana Branch Travel Demand Modeling Report Alternatives Analysis Appendix B TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 8 2. Model Validation .................................................................................................................................... 9 2.1. Transit Routes Selected For Validation ....................................................................................... 10 2.2. Highway Network Modifications ................................................................................................. 17 2.3. Transit
    [Show full text]
  • Access to Jobs and Workers Via Transit
    Access to Jobs and Workers via Transit A geospatial data resource from U.S. EPA’s Office of Sustainable Communities Technical Documentation and Data User Guide First released: March 19, 2014 Last Updated: March 19, 2014 Authors: Kevin Ramsey, Ph.D.1 U.S. EPA Office of Sustainable Communities & Alexander Bell, AICP Renaissance Planning Group 1 In late March 2014 Kevin Ramsey will be leaving EPA for a new position with BERK. Questions about the status of this dataset can be sent to Ted Cochin ([email protected]). 1 Summary Access to Jobs and Workers via Transit is a free geospatial data resource and web mapping tool for comparing the performance of neighborhoods in regards to their accessibility to destinations via public transit service. Using publically available transit service data we calculated – for each U.S. census block group – travel time to all other census block groups accessible via transit. Drawing on data from the census we tabulated how many people live and work in those accessible block groups. We combined these data to summarize several indicators of transit accessibility for individual block groups as well as regional benchmarks for comparison. Travel time is limited to 45 minutes and is inclusive of wait times, transfers, and walking to/from transit stops. Coverage is limited to metropolitan regions and counties served by transit agencies that publically share their service data in a standard format called GTFS. A full listing of those areas is included as appendix to this report. Figure 1 displays one variable from this dataset for the Washington DC metropolitan region.
    [Show full text]