Salsa2bills 1..2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

By:AADutton H.R.ANo.A1975 RESOLUTION 1 WHEREAS, Countless lives were touched by the kindness and 2 spiritual leadership of the Reverend Father Isaac Onante Francis, 3 who passed away on April 26, 2007; and 4 WHEREAS, Born on December 19, 1949, in Ghana, Isaac Francis 5 initially trained to be an accountant and worked in various hotels 6 in Africa; he moved to the United States in 1973 and lived in New 7 York City, Worchester, Massachusetts, and Dallas before settling in 8 Houston and working for the Reed Company; after choosing to enter 9 the priesthood, he was educated in Wisconsin, earning his 10 bachelor 's degree from Cardinal Stritch University in Milwaukee and 11 his master of divinity degree from the Sacred Heart School of 12 Theology in Hales Corners; and 13 WHEREAS, The Reverend Father Francis was ordained a priest of 14 the Archdiocese of Galveston-Houston on December 13, 1997; over the 15 years, he served as assistant pastor of St. Cyril of Alexandria 16 Church, St. Thomas More Church, and St. Francis of Assisi Church; in 17 addition, he helped families in their time of need as hospital 18 chaplain at Lyndon B. Johnson Hospital in Houston; and 19 WHEREAS, Although his death has brought great sorrow to his 20 family and his parishioners, "Father Isaac" lived a caring and 21 purposeful life, and his gentle spirit and warm smile brought joy 22 and comfort to all who were fortunate enough to share in his wise 23 counsel; now, therefore, be it 24 RESOLVED, That the House of Representatives of the 80th Texas 80R18540 LRP-D 1 H.R.ANo.A1975 1 Legislature hereby pay tribute to the life of the Reverend Father 2 Isaac Onante Francis and offer condolences to the members of his 3 family: to his sisters, Afua Afrakoma and Philomena Adu; to his 4 nephews, Ben Twum, Sam Bonsu, and Frank Adu Mensah; and to his other 5 relatives and many friends; and, be it further 6 RESOLVED, That an official copy of this resolution be 7 prepared for his family and that when the Texas House of 8 Representatives adjourns this day, it do so in memory of the 9 Reverend Father Isaac Onante Francis. 2.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Cyril of Alexandria 11:20 - 13:00 Tuesday, 20Th August, 2019 Room 1 Presentation Type Short Communications
Cyril of Alexandria 11:20 - 13:00 Tuesday, 20th August, 2019 Room 1 Presentation type Short Communications 605 Surpassing Mere Logomachy: Cyril and Theodoret on the Third and Fourth Anathemas Michael Magree, S.J. University of Notre Dame, South Bend, USA Abstract To avoid erroneous evaluations of ancient debates, it is necessary to note the particulars of the arguments in order to see just where the disagreements lay. In the case of Theodoret of Cyrus’s and Cyril of Alexandria’s debates about the twelve anathemas, the exchanges about Philippians 2:5-11 show that each recognized points of agreement in their common opposition to non-Nicene theologies and, more precisely, in their common acceptance both of the Word’s consubstantiality with the Father and of the Word’s consequent immutability and omniscience. Each bishop attempted to use these principles to argue for their respective differing claims about the Word enfleshed. Theodoret said that the union of humanity and divinity cannot be called natural, because this would obscure the distinction of these natures and would make the union involuntary. Cyril had used just such a distinction of nature and will, but he then had to clarify how it applied. Theodoret argued that consubstantiality means that the Word cannot be ignorant, and therefore Jesus Christ can only be ignorant insofar as he is the human subject of ignorance. Cyril said that a true union must entail the ability to say that the incarnate Word is the subject of ignorance, while not ignorant in itself. Cyril’s repetition of the claim that ‘the same one can both suffer and not suffer’ in his later Quod Unus Sit Christusshowed that Theodoret’s attack on this point hit on a claim that Cyril could recognize as difficult to accept.
[Show full text]
The Christological Function of Divine Impassibility: Cyril of Alexandria and Contemporary Debate
The Christological Function of Divine Impassibility: Cyril of Alexandria and Contemporary Debate by David Andrew Graham A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Wycliffe College and the Theological Department of the Toronto School of Theology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Theology awarded by the University of St. Michael's College © Copyright by David Andrew Graham 2013 The Christological Function of Divine Impassibility: Cyril of Alexandria and Contemporary Debate David Andrew Graham Master of Arts in Theology University of St. Michael’s College 2013 Abstract This thesis contributes to the debate over the meaning and function of the doctrine of divine impassibility in theological and especially christological discourse. Seeking to establish the coherence and utility of the paradoxical language characteristic of the received christological tradition (e.g. the impassible Word became passible flesh and suffered impassibly), it argues that the doctrine of divine apatheia illuminates the apocalyptic and soteriological dimension of the incarnate Son’s passible life more effectively than recent reactions against it. The first chapter explores the Christology of Cyril of Alexandria and the meaning and place of apatheia within it. In light of the christological tradition which Cyril epitomized, the second chapter engages contemporary critiques and re-appropriations of impassibility, focusing on the particular contributions of Jürgen Moltmann, Robert W. Jenson, Bruce L. McCormack and David Bentley Hart. ii Acknowledgments If this thesis communicates any truth, beauty and goodness, credit belongs to all those who have shaped my life up to this point. In particular, I would like to thank the Toronto School of Theology and Wycliffe College for providing space to do theology from within the catholic church.
[Show full text]
Circumcision of the Spirit in the Soteriology of Cyril of Alexandria Jonathan Stephen Morgan Marquette University
Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Dissertations (2009 -) Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Projects Circumcision of the Spirit in the Soteriology of Cyril of Alexandria Jonathan Stephen Morgan Marquette University Recommended Citation Morgan, Jonathan Stephen, "Circumcision of the Spirit in the Soteriology of Cyril of Alexandria" (2013). Dissertations (2009 -). Paper 277. http://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/277 CIRCUMCISION OF THE SPIRIT IN THE SOTERIOLOGY OF CYRIL OF ALEXANDRIA by Jonathan S. Morgan, B.S., M.A. A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Milwaukee, Wisconsin May 2013 ABSTRACT CIRCUMCISION OF THE SPIRIT IN THE SOTERIOLOGY OF CYRIL OF ALEXANDRIA Jonathan S. Morgan, B.S., M.A. Marquette University, 2013 In this dissertation I argue that Cyril of Alexandria’s interpretation of “spiritual circumcision” provides invaluable insight into his complex doctrine of salvation. Spiritual Circumcision – or Circumcision by the Spirit -- is a recurring theme throughout his extensive body of exegetical literature, which was written before the Nestorian controversy (428). When Cyril considers the meaning and scope of circumcision, he recognizes it as a type that can describe a range of salvific effects. For him, circumcision functions as a unifying concept that ties together various aspects of salvation such as purification, sanctification, participation, and freedom. Soteriology, however, can only be understood in relation to other doctrines. Thus, Cyril’s discussions of circumcision often include correlative areas of theology such as hamartiology and Trinitarian thought. In this way, Cyril’s discussions on circumcision convey what we are saved from, as well as the Trinitarian agency of our salvation.
[Show full text]
Saint Philomena Parish Lansdowne, Pennsylvania Saint Philomena Saint Cyril of Alexandria Roman Catholic Church Worship Site Founded 1898 Founded 1928
Saint Philomena Parish Lansdowne, Pennsylvania Saint Philomena Saint Cyril of Alexandria Roman Catholic Church Worship Site Founded 1898 Founded 1928 The Most Holy Body and Blood of Christ - June 23, 2019 ! XrrxqhHhrTQuvyrh) #$$ " %#&$'()* ! ! TqhHhr)TQuvyrh) + ,#-, Srp Qh vuPssvpr) .#&$-$#$$-/#$$0 ! "# $ % #&'(' Cy9hsPiyvthvTQuvyrh) Qur)% %!!!#! Vigil 6;00 p.m. ) *+,#'-,..-#.#( %#&$#$$-/0 .#$$ ' ! R* @hvy)uvyrhh vu5 pp ! Xrivr)uvyhp Cy9hvuPiyvthvTQuvyrh) 2+'' TWvprqrQhyTpvr /00 8srvTQuvyrh) Qh vuSrtv hv) 2#&$ ,#$$ /00 2#$$ 2#2, Hv hpyHrqhyIrh 6q hvsur7yrrqThp hr) 1 0 %2 TQuvyrh) IrhvC sT8 vy ,#$$ ) 0 %2 ! @rvtQ hr Wrr hq7rrqvpvsur Qr rhyIrhvu sThvQuvyrh H7yrrqThp hr) ! ! ! ! ! ! ,#&$ Thp hrhyGvsrhq8hrpurv) GrtvsHh 3 ! ! " ! 45 %#-, SAINT PHILOMENA ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH, LANSDOWNE, PA Masses for the Week V:`:`1.1QJV`5 !Q1$RQV'$QJV$RV'H`1GV$Q`$RVJV$ .V$!QC7$2%H.:`1' - > .V !""# Eucharist is the source and summit of the Chrisan life. The other sacraments, and indeed all ecclesiascal minis- `1V:`V1Q`@Q` .V:]Q QC: V5:`VGQ%JR%]11 . .V $ Eucharisc and are oriented toward it. For in the blessed !""# ! "#$% Eucharisc is contained the whole spiritual good of the % .%`H.5J:IVC75.`1 .1IVC`5Q%`:H.8?RRRR !""# #%&%#' ! V`VHV10V .VQ%`HV:JR%II1 T that gi of our Savior $& '&( ()& every me that we Celebrate the Eucharist. The readings !""# (' & *&&$ .VC]% QIVV .`1 5=% :G`:.:I1:IV G7 .V !""# @1J$Q`!:CVI5:JR .V7QcV`VR .VG`V:R:JR11JV Q .V $& & $(+ ( Lord. Paul; reminds us that we have the obligaon to hand !""# QJ1.: 1V.:0V`VHV10VRV .V!QJQ`$QRV%.V `%V & $&&# IV:J1J$Q` .V&%H.:`1 8.`1 `VR .V]VQ]CV51JR ,!-,# )% *% strucng the disciples to do the same V=% :1V.:0V .!/"# ! + , % been given the same command through our bapsm and -"!""# %- ! the recepon of the Eucharist.
[Show full text]
A Public Debate on Cyril of Alexandria's Views on The
International Journal of the Classical Tradition https://doi.org/10.1007/s12138-019-00551-1 ARTICLE A Public Debate on Cyril of Alexandria’s Views on the Procession of the Holy Spirit in Seventeenth‑Century Constantinople: the Jesuit Reaction to Nicodemos Metaxas’s Greek Editions Nil Palabıyık1 © The Author(s) 2020 On a September afternoon in 1627, crowds gathered at the library of the Jesuit resi- dence in Constantinople to witness a lively public discussion between two repre- sentatives of the Roman Catholic Church concerning Cyril of Alexandria’s views on the procession of the Holy Spirit.1 It is interesting to see that a ffth-century church father’s writings in the context of a dispute dating back to the sixth century were still considered politically relevant, socially infuential and theologically compelling in seventeenth-century Constantinople. The primary aim of this rather ostentatious gathering was to adopt and promote a diferent (according to Eastern Christians an ‘erroneous’) viewpoint on Cyril of Alexandria’s writings on the procession of the Holy Spirit, and thereby to present a counter-argument to that of the Eastern Church. The Jesuit dispute ultimately targeted the theological stance and the reputation of Cyril Lucaris (1572–1638), the ecumenical patriarch of Constantinople and the of- cial head of the populous Greek Orthodox millet of the Ottoman Empire. 1 Cyril of Alexandria’s opinion on this question is still controversial, but lies beyond the scope of this article. For a succinct overview, see A. E. Siecienski, The Filioque: History of a Doctrinal Controversy, Oxford, 2010, pp. 47–50.
[Show full text]
The First Adam-Second Adam Typology in John Chrysostom and Cyril of Alexandria
Perichoresis Volume 12. Issue 2 (2014): 153-162 DOI 10.2478/perc-2014-0009 THE FIRST ADAM-SECOND ADAM TYPOLOGY IN JOHN CHRYSOSTOM AND CYRIL OF ALEXANDRIA ASHISH J. NAIDU * Talbot School of Theology, Biola University ABSTRACT. Patristic scholars have commented on the early church ’s common practice of drawing catechetical instructions from the creation account in Genesis. One of the recurring motifs in such dis- cussions is the fathers ’ use of the Adam-Christ typology with its soteriological and sacramental implica- tions. The present study briefly explores this theme in John Chrysostom and Cyril of Alexandria with particular reference to the baptism of Jesus and the theological challenge it posed to the early church: Did Jesus the Lord receive the Spirit at his baptism? Why did he need to be baptized? What is the rela- tionship between the baptism of Jesus and Christian baptism? Both Cyril and Chrysostom make in- sightful use of the Adamic typology in this context as they discuss how Christ ’s work restores fallen humanity from corruption and death that followed Adam ’s sin. First, the study examines how the aforementioned fathers from two distinct traditions view the baptism of Jesus in the recovery of God ’s grace that was lost in Adam ’s fall. Second, the study will demonstrate that both Chrysostom and Cyril had much in common in their understanding of the transforming grace and work of the Spirit in re- fashioning the believer into a new creation at baptism. And third, it will be shown that there was a con- sensus on soteriological and sacramental perspectives among the Alexandrians and the Antiochenes.
[Show full text]
Saint Michael the Archangel Orthodox Church
Saint Michael the Archangel Orthodox Church 146 Third Avenue, Rankin, PA 15104 Pastor: Very Reverend Nicholas Ferencz, PhD Cantor: Professor Jerry Jumba Parish President : Carole Bushak Glory to Jesus Christ! Glory Forever! Slava Isusu Christu! Slava vo v’iki! Rectory Phone: 412 271-2725. E-mail: [email protected] Hall Phone: 412-294-7952 WEB: www.stmichaelsrankin.org JANUARY 24, 2021 SUNDAY AFTER THEOPHANY Sun., Jan. 24 Sunday after Theophany. Monk Thedosius 9:00 AM Divine Liturgy Panachida: George Dorogy 40 Day Memorial Sun, Jan. 31 34th Sunday after Pentecost. 13th Luke. Archbishops Athanasius and Cyril of Alexandria 9:00 AM Divine Liturgy. Panachida: January Perpetuals: (1/4) Sveton Simonoff. (1/10) Michael Lesko, Jr. (1/11) Joseph Zeok. (1/14) Mary Palovcsik. (1/17) Michael Beresh. (1/25) Steve Stegena. (1/31) Michael Hritz, Peter Belinsky. Sun., Feb. 7 35th Sunday after Pentecost. 14th Luke. Bishop Gregory of Nazianzus, called the Theologion 9:00 AM Divine Liturgy. Annual Parish Meeting Fri., Feb 12 Three Holy Bishops Basil the Great, Gregory the Theologion and John Chrysostom 9:00 AM Divine Liturgy Sun., Feb. 14 Sunday of Zacchaeus. Martyr Tryphon. Nun Brigid of Kildare 9:00 AM Divine Liturgy. Oath of Office of the Newly Elected Parish Council Holy Mystery of Confession: I will be available for Confessions after the Divine Liturgy, when the church is more private. Or, you can make an appointment and we will arrange an appropriate time. Please just contact me. PEOPLE STUFF Prayer List: Deceased: George Dorogy. Joseph Merlo. Kathy Bonnano Living: Father Joe Cervo. Father George Livanos.
[Show full text]
The Alexandrian and the Cappadocian Fathers of the Church in the Writings of Thomas Aquinas
The Alexandrian and the Cappadocian Fathers of the Church in the writings of Thomas Aquinas Los Padres alejandrinos y capadocios en los escritos de Tomás de Aquino Leo J. Elders s.v.d. Pontifical Academy of St. Thomas Aquinas Resumen: Santo Tomás considera que los escritos de los Padres están directamente relacionados con las Escrituras ya que fueron escritos bajo la influencia rectora del mismo Espíritu Santo. Existe, pues, una continuidad de pensamiento entre los Padres como re- presentantes de la autoridad de los Apóstoles y la Biblia. Por este motivo, sería bueno re- conocer cuán profundamente santo Tomás se inspira en el pensamiento de los Padres. En esta contribución presentaremos los temas principales dentro de los escritos de los Padres Alejandrinos y Capadocios que han influido en el propio pensamiento de santo Tomás. Palabras clave: Atanasio de Alejandría, Cirilo de Alejandría, Basilio Magno, Gre- gorio Nacianceno, Gregorio de Nisa, Tomás de Aquino. Abstract: St. Thomas considers the writings of the Fathers as directly related to Scrip- ture since these were composed under the guiding influence of the same Holy Spirit. There exists therefore a continuity of thought between the Fathers as representatives of the au- thority of the Apostles and the Bible.1 For this reason, one would do well to recognize how deeply St. Thomas draw upon the thought of the Fathers. In this contribution we will present the main themes within the writings of the Alexandrian and Cappadocian Fathers that have influenced St. Thomas’s own thought.2 Key words: Athanasius of Alexandria, Cyril of Alexandria, Basil the Great, Gregory of Nazianzus, Gregory of Nyssa, Thomas Aquinas.
[Show full text]
The Psukhē in and Behind Clement of Alexandria's Paedagogus
University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2016 Psukhai That Matter: The Psukhē in and Behind Clement of Alexandria’s Paedagogus Phillip Jay Webster University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, and the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Webster, Phillip Jay, "Psukhai That Matter: The Psukhē in and Behind Clement of Alexandria’s Paedagogus" (2016). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2088. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2088 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2088 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Psukhai That Matter: The Psukhē in and Behind Clement of Alexandria’s Paedagogus Abstract This dissertation aims to investigate the ideology and mechanics of the ancient soul’s materiality as witnessed in Clement of Alexandria’s late second- or early third-century work, the Paedagogus. I focus on four ways in which Clement refers to the soul: (1) as an entity in need of punishment and healing, (2) as vulnerable to substances and the activities of the body, (3) as made visible through the body’s appearance, and (4) as an internal moral-core. Through the lens of the Paedagogus, this dissertation introduces recent theoretical work on “materiality” and “the body,” especially as developed in gender studies, into the broad scholarly conversation about the ancient soul. In the process, it shows how Clement uses the interactions between the ancient soul and the ancient body in his attempt to produce and police Christian subjects.
[Show full text]
John Chrysostom 11:20 - 13:00 Tuesday, 20Th August, 2019 Room 7 Presentation Type Short Communications
John Chrysostom 11:20 - 13:00 Tuesday, 20th August, 2019 Room 7 Presentation type Short Communications 277 Adam-Christ Typology in Cyril of Alexandria and John Chrysostom Ashish Naidu Biola University, La Mirada, CA, USA Abstract The biblical narrative of the baptism of Jesus posed a theological conundrum to the early church: how can Jesus the Lord ‘receive’ the Spirit at his baptism and why does he need to be baptized? Some scholars have persuasively shown how Cyril of Alexandria resolves this tension by invoking the theme of kenosis and using Adamic typology. However, scholars have largely marginalized John Chrysostom’s perspective on this thorny subject. I will examine Chrysostom’s treatment of this topic in Matthew and in his Baptismal Instructions against the background of Cyril’s perspective. I hope to show that although Chrysostom employs classical pedagogical methods and rhetorical devices, deeper concerns shape his reading of the texts. Careful examination of the words in scripture must in turn be complemented with precision in spiritual and moral application. The goal of Christian paideia in the early church was to persuade individuals to follow Christ example, and be united to his virtuous life. It is therefore not surprising that although both Chrysostom and Cyril belong to two different traditions and interpret the baptism of Jesus differently, their soteriological and sacramental views overlap significantly. 420 Rhetoric and Therapy in John Chrysostom’s Trinitarian Discourse Pak-Wah Lai Biblical Graduate School of Theology, Singapore, Singapore Abstract Recent studies on Chrysostom’s Trinitarian teachings have shown his indebtedness to Meletius of Antioch, the Eusebians, and Basil of Caesarea.
[Show full text]
2019 Church Fathers Resources
Are you interested in learning more about the Fathers? Below are some suggested sources to help you get started, along with a list of Church Fathers. You can also learn more by taking a course on the Fathers, which is offered regulary at the Notre Dame Graduate School of Christendom College on campus and online. Please call the office at 703 658 4304 for details. Suggested reading Altaner, Berthold. Patrology. Translated by Hilda C. Graef. Freiburg, Herder & Herder, 1958. A great single-volume overview on the writings of the Fathers. Aquilina, Mike. The Fathers of the Church: An Introduction to the First Christian Teachers. Huntington, IN: OSV. A handy popular introduction which includes a selection of short primary source texts in English translation. Benedict XVI, Pope. Church Fathers: From Clement of Rome to Augustine. General Audiences 7 March 2007-27 February 2008. San Francisco: Ignatius, 2008. ---. Church Fathers and Teachers: From Saint Leo the Great to Peter Lombard. General Audiences 5 March 2008-25 June 2008, 11 February 2009-17 June 2009, 2 September 2009-30 December 2009. San Francisco, Ignatius, 2010. These two books are the best succinct introduction to the Fathers. They are written from an informed scholarly perspective, but they make the individual authors come alive in a very readable way. Jurgens, William A. The Faith of the Early Fathers. 3 vols. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 1970. This source is an English manual of brief excerpts from the Fathers arranged in historical sequence. It is a staple reference work useful for locating passages from the Fathers on particular points of doctrine.
[Show full text]
The Christological Controversy Between Nestorius of Constantinople and Cyril of Alexandria
VOX PATRUM 32 (2012) t. 57 Eirini ARTEMI (Ateny) THE CHRISTOLOGICAL CONTROVERSY BETWEEN NESTORIUS OF CONSTANTINOPLE AND CYRIL OF ALEXANDRIA St. Cyril, Patriarch of Alexandria, glory of the Eastern Church and cel- ebrated champion of the Virgin Mother of God, has always been held by the Church in the highest esteem. Ηe was defined by Eulogios of Alexandria as „the guardian of the exactitude”1, the guardian of the true faith. Anastasios Sinaitis called him as „ the seal (Sphragis) of the Fathers”2. These phrases describe the characteristic feature of Cyril, the Bishop of Alexandria constant references to earlier ecclesiastical authors (including, in particular, Athana- sius), for the purpose of showing the continuity with the tradition of theology itself. He deliberately, explicitly inserted himself in the Church’s tradition, which he recognized as guaranteeing continuity with the Apostles and with Christ himself. Venerated as a Saint in both East and West, in 1882 St Cyril was proclaimed a Doctor of the Church by Pope Leo XIII3. In 428-430 Cyril, patriarch of Alexandria became embroiled with Nesto- rius, patriarch of Constantinople, who was preaching that Mary was not the Mother of God since Christ was Divine and not human, and consequently she should not have the word Theotokos (God-bearer) applied to her4. The bishop 1 Cfr. Photius Constantinopolitanus, Bibliotheca 230, 289a, PG 103, 1032A: „Ð fÚlax tÁj ¢kribe…aj KÚrilloj”. 2 Cfr Anastasius Sinaita, Viae dux (Hodegos) 7, PG 89, 113D: „oÙk aÙtoà Kur…llou tÁj sfrag…doj tîn Patšrwn ™fe…sato”. 3 Cfr Benedictus XVI papa, Catechesis de S.
[Show full text]