An Assessment of the Economics of Natural and Built Infrastructure for Water Resources in Maine

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Assessment of the Economics of Natural and Built Infrastructure for Water Resources in Maine An Assessment of the Economics of Natural and Built Infrastructure for Water Resources in Maine Charles S Colgan PhD Damon Yakovleff MCPD Samuel B. Merrill PhD May 2013 Acknowledgements !e authors wish to acknowledge the contributions and feedback of the following individuals and organizations: Mark Anderson (University of Maine-Orono), John Burrows (Atlantic Salmon Federation), Gregg Caporossi (!e Trust for Public Land), Barbara Charry (Maine Audubon), Diano Circo (!e Trust for Public Land), Dan Coker (!e Nature Conservancy), Andy Cutko (Maine Natural Areas Program), Geo" Herman (Maine Munic- ipal Association), Paul Hunt (Portland Water District), Shaleen Jain (University of Maine-Orono), Kris Johnson (!e Nature Conservancy), Linda Orel (!e Trust for Public Land), Josh Royte (!e Nature Conservancy), Mark Smith (!e Nature Conservancy), Nancy Smith (GrowSmart Maine), John Talberth (World Resources Institute), R. Collin !errien (Maine Dept. of Conservation), Andrews Tolman (DHHS-Drinking Water Program), Steve Walker (Maine Department of Inland Fisheries & Wildlife), and Jed Wright (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). Special thanks to the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, for its support of collaborative conservation #nance research, and to the Elmina B. Sewall Foundation, for its long-standing commitment to the environment and human well-being in the state of Maine. About the Authors Chales S. Colgan is Professor of Public Policy & Management and is a Research Associate of the New England Environmental Finance Center and Chair of the Graduate Program in Community Planning & Development in the Muskie School of Public Service at the University of Southern Maine. Damon Yakovle" is a Research Associate of the New England Environmental Finance Center. Samuel B. Merrill is Director of the New England Environmental Finance Center and an Associate Research Pro- fessor of Community Planning & Development in the Muskie School of Public Service. An Assessment of the Economics of Natural and Built Infrastructure for Water Resources in Maine i Table of Contents Acknowledgements .....................................................................................................................................i About the Authors .......................................................................................................................................i Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................2 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................9 Economics of Water Resource Management: Evidence from Outside Maine ................................. 10 Drinking Water Quality and Reliability ............................................................................................... 10 Riverine Flood Hazard Mitigation ........................................................................................................ 11 Coastal Flooding Protection .................................................................................................................. 12 Addressing Stream Crossing Vulnerabilities ....................................................................................... 13 Stormwater Management ....................................................................................................................... 14 Economics of Water Resource Infrastructure: Evidence from Maine .............................................. 18 Natural Infrastructure Conservation Need Analysis for Maine ........................................................ 18 Avoided Costs of Riverine Flooding in York County (Natural Infrastructure) ............................. 21 Coastal Flood Protection Investments (Natural Infrastructure) ....................................................... 24 Upgrading Culverts in Maine (Built Infrastructure) .......................................................................... 25 Low Impact Development for Stormwater Management (Built Infrastructure)............................. 26 Value of Filtration Avoidance Waivers in Maine (Natural, Built Infrastructure) ........................... 27 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................... 28 References ................................................................................................................................................. 29 Appendix 1: Natural Infrastructure Spatial Analysis .......................................................................... 32 Appendix 2: Aquatic Connectivity Improvement - A Municipal Case Study ................................. 52 Appendix 3: Maine Potato Board Irrigation Survey Report (2010) .................................................. 57 ii The farmhouse lingers, though averse to square With the new city street it has to wear A number in. But what about the brook That held the house as in an elbow-crook? Robert Frost ©David McClain Executive Summary Clockwise: ©Bruce Kidman; ©Town of Sullivan; ISTOCKPHOTO.COM; ©Bridget Besaw ©Bridget ISTOCKPHOTO.COM; Sullivan; of ©Town Clockwise: ©Bruce Kidman; Water is Maine’s most essential resource. Yet Dispersed population growth has spread the need for new we only seem to notice it when there is too systems across the landscape, creating stresses on both the quantity and quality of Maine’s historically abundant much or too little of it. groundwater and surface water supplies. Steps to address Water is critical to everything that lives in Maine. Most the inadequacies of these systems to manage stormwater of the ways we use, or are a"ected by, water are greatly $ows are long overdue. in$uenced by how we decide to manage the state’s water A changing climate is producing increasingly frequent and resources. Traditionally, when population size justi#ed the extreme precipitation. York County, for example, experi- investment, we have focused on the construction of central- enced 100 year and 500 year $oods within a single year. ized water supply systems and strategies to remove wastes. But the demands on these centralized water systems are Historically, almost all water resource issues were addressed changing. by building expensive new infrastructure. Today it has 2 Water resources are most effectively and HɝFLHQWO\PDQDJHGE\ERWKEXLOGLQJ DQGQRWEXLOGLQJQHZLQIUDVWUXFWXUH !e report concludes that there are numerous opportunities for Maine to meet the demands for new, upgraded, and ex- panded water resources management and to do so at much lower costs than is o&en thought (or feared) possible. Four aspects of water resources are examined in the report: 1. Maintaining drinking water quality 2. Mitigating $ood hazards 3. Ensuring adequate culverts 4. Managing stormwater Maintaining drinking ISTOCKPHOTO.COM water quality Maintaining drinking water that meets the strict standards of the federal Safe Drinking Water Act requires that water supply, transport, treatment, and distribution systems must be of high quality. But high quality can come at a high price; #nding least-cost solutions to meeting federal requirements is a continuing challenge for public water systems. As pop- ulations grow, thresholds are reached where meeting federal standards can require expensive new treatment technol- ogies. Avoiding such expense is an urgent need for many regions. New York City confronted this problem a decade ago. A&er a cost/bene#t analysis, the City decided it would be more © David Bates © David cost e"ective to conserve land around their water sources and take other steps to preserve the cleanliness of the water become clear that water resources are most e"ectively and coming to the City from the Catskill Mountains, 100 miles e%ciently managed by both building, and not building, new to the northwest. Over ten years, the City spent $1.4 billion infrastructure. Promoting the use of natural systems’ abil- to purchase land and protect supplies in the Catskills. But ities to keep water clean, to di"use the e"ects of $ooding, this substantial sum was considerably less than $3.0 to $6.0 and to dispose of wastes (within limits) is now accepted as billion in capital construction costs (plus $250 million in an e"ective and economically viable alternative to building annual operating costs) that would have been required in large new structural solutions to water problems. the alternative. Where the option to preserve land was not available, in the Croton watershed, New York City had no !is report examines the opportunities to more cost e"ec- choice but to spend $2.8 billion on a #ltration plant. tively address water resource management needs in Maine through the combined use of natural systems (“natural in- While a water system serving nine million people may frastructure”) and lower cost decentralized structures (part seem an out-of-scale comparison for Maine, the New York of the general category of “built infrastructure”). experience has very useful lessons for Maine. New York’s An Assessment of the Economics of Natural and Built Infrastructure for Water Resources in Maine 3 approach, for example, requires that land conservation be on a strictly willing seller-willing buyer basis and the con- served lands are open for an array of recreational uses from hunting and #shing to hiking and cross-country skiing. Closer to home, a recent study sought to apply the New
Recommended publications
  • Preliminary Flood Insurance Study
    VOLUME 4 OF 4 YORK COUNTY, MAINE (ALL JURISDICTIONS) COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER ACTON, TOWN OF 230190 OGUNQUIT, TOWN OF 230632 ALFRED, TOWN OF 230191 OLD ORCHARD BEACH, TOWN OF 230153 ARUNDEL, TOWN Of 230192 PARSONSFIELD, TOWN OF 230154 BERWICK, TOWN OF 230144 SACO, CITY OF 230155 BIDDEFORD, CITY OF 230145 SANFORD, CITY OF 230156 BUXTON, TOWN OF 230146 SHAPLEIGH, TOWN OF 230198 CORNISH, TOWN OF 230147 SOUTH BERWICK, TOWN OF 230157 DAYTON, TOWN OF 230148 WATERBORO, TOWN OF 230199 ELIOT, TOWN OF 230149 WELLS, TOWN OF 230158 HOLLIS, TOWN OF 230150 YORK, TOWN OF 230159 KENNEBUNK, TOWN OF 230151 KENNEBUNKPORT, TOWN OF 230170 KITTERY, TOWN OF 230171 LEBANON, TOWN OF 230193 LIMERICK, TOWN OF 230194 LIMINGTON, TOWN OF 230152 LYMAN, TOWN OF 230195 NEWFIELD, TOWN OF 230196 NORTH BERWICK, TOWN OF 230197 EFFECTIVE: FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 23005CV004A Version Number 2.3.2.1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Volume 1 Page SECTION 1.0 – INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 The National Flood Insurance Program 1 1.2 Purpose of this Flood Insurance Study Report 2 1.3 Jurisdictions Included in the Flood Insurance Study Project 2 1.4 Considerations for using this Flood Insurance Study Report 20 SECTION 2.0 – FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS 31 2.1 Floodplain Boundaries 31 2.2 Floodways 43 2.3 Base Flood Elevations 44 2.4 Non-Encroachment Zones 44 2.5 Coastal Flood Hazard Areas 45 2.5.1 Water Elevations and the Effects of Waves 45 2.5.2 Floodplain Boundaries and BFEs for Coastal Areas 46 2.5.3 Coastal High Hazard Areas 47 2.5.4 Limit of Moderate Wave Action 48 SECTION
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Conservation Planning for Watersheds of Southern Maine
    watermark volume 26 issue 1 5 stewardship / conserving natural resources Status of Conservation Planning for Watersheds of Southern Maine The Wells Reserve has produced or assisted with every key conservation planning document prepared for What is a watershed? southern Maine watersheds over the past decade. Use this chart to learn which plans cover your town, then An area in which water, sediments, download the plan(s) from our website or read them at the Dorothy Fish Coastal Resource Library. and dissolved material drain to a To get involved in land or water protection in your area, contact the individuals or organizations named common outlet, such as a river, lake, in the plans. Key contacts for most towns and watersheds can also be found at swim.wellsreserve.org. If these bay, or ocean. avenues don’t work out, call the Wells Reserve stewardship coordinator, Tin Smith, at 646-1555 ext 119. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Watershed A geographic area in which water flows on its way to a larger water body, such as a stream, river, estuary, lake, or Town Bridges Swamp Neddick River Cape River Works Great Josias River Kennebunk River Little River Mousam River Ogunquit River River Piscataqua River Salmon Falls Southside Brook Creek Spruce River Webhannet River York ocean. Coastal and ocean resources Acton 7 11 are affected not only by activities in Alfred 4 7 coastal areas but also by those in Arundel 4 7 upland watersheds. Berwick 2,3 2,11 U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy Eliot 2,11 2,11 2,13,14 2,16,17 Kennebunk 4 5,6 7 Kennebunkport 4 Why these watersheds? Kittery 11 11 0 13,14 16,17 The chart shows the Maine watersheds Lebanon 11 and towns that are included in the web- Lyman 4 7 based Seacoast Watershed Information North Berwick 2,3 2,11 Manager (swim.wellsreserve.org).
    [Show full text]
  • Firm Map Index Nfip
    MAP NUMBER MAP DATES Great Works Goodall MAP REPOSITORIES River Brook TOWN OF LYMAN L i This FIRM Index displays the map date for each t B t Duck Brook (Maps available for reference only, not for l CITY OF SACO og e Estes Lake FIRM panel at the time that this Index was Br R distribution.) ook Mousam ive TOWN OF W TOWN OF printed. Because this Index may not be r River Mousam ard Brook 9 River ALFRED ARUNDEL (! distributed to unaffected communities in 23031C0361G 23031C0362G Bush Brook 23031C0391G 23031C0392G subsequent revisions, users may determine the 23031C0411G 23031C0412G 23031C0416G 23031C0417G CITY OF BIDDEFORD ACTON, TOWN OF: Salmon 23031C0440G 23031C0441G 23031C0442G 23031C0461G current map date for each FIRM panel by visiting TOWN OF (!35 23031C0462G 23031C0466G 23031C0467G 23031C0486G Town Hall Falls River Round Swamps the FEMA Map Service Center website at S 35 H Road KENNEBUNK mit Little Old Fishing k Brook h http://msc.fema.gov, or by calling the FEMA Map SANFORD Mousam o B River Acton, Maine 04001 23031C0370G Pond 1 o r r o 23031C0390G REGIONAL Kennebunk ¤£ ok Information eXchange (FMIX) at 1-877-336-2627. River B River l B Sand AIRPORT il a Great Works River tso ALFRED, TOWN OF: Pond M n 23031C0495G*** Communities annexing land on adjacent FIRM f R TOWN OF LEBANON i Town Hall 99 of v 23031C0490G*** (! e panels must obtain a current copy of the 4 G 23031C0363G 23031C0364G** (! TOWN OF r 16 Saco Road 23031C0393G adjacent panel as well as the current FIRM 23031C0394G 23031C0413G 23031C0420G KENNEBUNKPORT Alfred, Maine 04002 23031C0414G 23031C0438G 23031C0439G 23031C0443G 23031C0444G 23031C0463G Index.
    [Show full text]
  • October 16, 2020 Phase 1 Economic Recovery Grants to Maine Small Businesses & Non-Profits
    October 16, 2020 Phase 1 Economic Recovery Grants to Maine Small Businesses & Non-Profits Name of Business Business/Organization City Grant Award Acheson Hotels, llc Wells $37,553.30 Taurus Capital Group OLD ORCHARD BEACH $100,000.00 Cowbell Hospitality LLC Biddeford $56,667.37 Dimitri Inc Old orchard Beach $100,000.00 Beach Dog, LLC York Beach $8,086.25 Fatbabys sweets sanford $5,503.25 CJA Corporation York $86,639.46 Carlisle Academy Integrative Equine Therapy & Sports,Lyman LLC $34,047.29 JAK Designs LLC Kennebunk $47,052.68 Sonmat, Inc. Kittery $69,609.58 Ellega Inn Inc. Kennebunk $66,945.68 Inn On The Blues york beach $100,000.00 Karamel Inc Cape Neddick $27,720.32 Acupuncture by Meret Saco $6,904.49 Firkinsnock Enterprise LLC Lyman $79,307.84 CSP Mobile Production Saco $100,000.00 Barbarian Enterprises kennebunkport $12,554.61 KB building Contractors LLC Saco $100,000.00 George E. Begin Saco $27,243.16 Blue Elephant Events and Catering Saco $100,000.00 Family Acupuncture & Holistic Medicine KITTERY $38,232.41 Junora LTD Biddeford $100,000.00 Port Enterprises, Inc. Kennebunkport $85,203.16 RJP Investment Corp Old Orchard Beach $39,581.68 Highland Farms Dairy LLC Cornish $925.58 Robert Bolduc P.A. Biddeford $100,000.00 Anchor Promotions, LLC. Biddeford Pool $42,406.74 Collective Motion Arts Center Saco $6,057.70 Pilots Cove Cafe, LLC Sanford $38,824.98 Tracy Lynn Boyd MacPhee Saco $20,519.46 Youth Enrichment Center at Hilton-Winn Farm Cape Neddick $20,862.76 MJB, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Oysters in Maine (1600S-1970S) Randy Lackovic University of Maine, [email protected]
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Darling Marine Center Historical Documents Darling Marine Center Historical Collections 3-2019 A History of Oysters in Maine (1600s-1970s) Randy Lackovic University of Maine, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/dmc_documents Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons, and the United States History Commons Repository Citation Lackovic, Randy, "A History of Oysters in Maine (1600s-1970s)" (2019). Darling Marine Center Historical Documents. 22. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/dmc_documents/22 This Newsletter is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Darling Marine Center Historical Documents by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A History of Oysters in Maine (1600s-1970s) This is a history of oyster abundance in Maine, and the subsequent decline of oyster abundance. It is a history of oystering, oyster fisheries, and oyster commerce in Maine. It is a history of the transplanting of oysters to Maine, and experiments with oysters in Maine, and of oyster culture in Maine. This history takes place from the 1600s to the 1970s. 17th Century {}{}{}{} In early days, oysters were to be found in lavish abundance along all the Atlantic coast, though Ingersoll says it was at least a small number of oysters on the Gulf of Maine coast.86, 87 Champlain wrote that in 1604, "All the harbors, bays, and coasts from Chouacoet (Saco) are filled with every variety of fish.
    [Show full text]
  • Seafloor Features and Characteristics of the Black Ledges Area, Penobscot Bay, Maine, USA
    Journal of Coastal Research SI 36 333-339 (ICS 2002 Proceedings) Northern Ireland ISSN 0749-0208 Seafloor Features and Characteristics of the Black Ledges Area, Penobscot Bay, Maine, USA. Allen M. Gontz, Daniel F. Belknap and Joseph T. Kelley Department of Geological Sciences, 111 Bryand Global Science Center, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, USA04469-5790. [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT The Black Ledges, a series of islands, shoals, and ledges in East Penobscot Bay, Maine, was mapped with digital sidescan sonar and shallow marine seismic reflection equipmentA total of 38 km2 of sidescan and 600 km of seismic data was collected during four cruises in 2000-2001. The sidescan sonar reveals a surficial geology dominated by muddy sediments with frequent, patchy outcrops of gravel and minor amounts of bedrock. There are seven large concentrations of pockmarks with populations totaling over 3500 in the areas of muddy sediments. Generally circular, pockmarks range in size from five to 75 meters in diameter and up to eight meters deep. Calculations show over 2 x 106 m3 of muddy sediment and pore water were removed from the system during pockmark formation. Seismic data reveal a simple stratigraphy of modern mud overlying late Pleistocene glaciomarine sediment, till and Paleozoic bedrock. Seismic data indicate areas of gas-rich sediments and gas- enhanced reflectors in close association with pockmarks, suggesting methane seepage as a cause of pockmark formation. Pockmarks are alsorecognized in areas lacking evidence of subsurface methane accumulations adding further validity to the late stage of development for the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Lubec Wastewater Treatment Facility, ME0102016, Draft Permit
    ME0102016 DRAFT Page 1 of 15 W006306-6C-H-R AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER CLEAN WATER ACT SECTION 301 (h) NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) In compliance with the provisions of the Federal Clean Water Act, as amended, (33 U.S.C. §§1251 et seq.; the "CWA"), and Title 38 Maine Revised Statutes § 414-A et seq., Town of Lubec 40 School St. Lubec, Maine 04652 is authorized to discharge from a facility located at 40 School St, Lubec, Maine to receiving water named Passamaquoddy Bay (Lubec Narrows) in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements and other conditions set forth herein. This NPDES permit shall become effective on the first day of the calendar month following 60 days after signature by both the Director of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or Region 1) and the Commissioner of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection (MEDEP or the Department).* This Waste Discharge License (WDL) shall become effective immediately upon signature by the Commissioner of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection. Both the NPDES permit and WDL shall expire concurrently at midnight, five (5) years from the date of signature by the Commissioner of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection. This permit supersedes the NPDES permit/WDL issued on November 12, 2008. This permit consists of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit including effluent limitations and monitoring requirements (Part I) and MEPDES Standard Conditions Applicable to All Permits (last revised July 1, 2002), and EPA NPDES Part II Standard Conditions (April 26, 2018), and Attachment A Effluent Mercury Test Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Maine Revised Statutes 38 §468
    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. Maine Revised Statutes 38 §468 Maine Revised Statutes Title 38: WATERS AND NAVIGATION Chapter 3: PROTECTION AND IMPROVEMENT OF WATERS Subchapter 1: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BOARD Article 4-A: WATER CLASSIFICATION PROGRAM §468. Classifications of minor drainages All surface waters lying within the boundaries of the State that are in basins having a drainage area less than 100 square miles that are not classified as lakes or ponds are classified in this section. [1989, c. 764, §20 (AMD).] 1. Cumberland County. Those waters draining directly or indirectly into tidal waters of Cumberland County, with the exception of the Androscoggin River Basin, the Presumpscot River Basin, the Royal River Basin and tributaries of the Androscoggin River Estuary and Merrymeeting Bay, entering above the Chops - Class B unless otherwise specified. A. Freeport. (1) Frost Gully Brook - Class A. [1989, c. 764, §21 (RPR).] A-1. Cape Elizabeth. (1) Trout Brook, those waters that form the town boundary with South Portland - Class C. [2009, c. 163, §13 (NEW).] B. Portland. (1) All minor drainages unless otherwise specified - Class C. (2) Stroudwater River from its origin to tidewater, including all tributaries - Class B. [2009, c. 163, §14 (AMD).] C. Scarborough. (1) All minor drainages - Class C unless otherwise specified.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Flood Insurance Study Information Volume 1
    VOLUME 1 OF 4 YORK COUNTY, MAINE (ALL JURISDICTIONS) COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER ACTON, TOWN OF 230190 OGUNQUIT, TOWN OF 230632 ALFRED, TOWN OF 230191 OLD ORCHARD BEACH, TOWN OF 230153 ARUNDEL, TOWN Of 230192 PARSONSFIELD, TOWN OF 230154 BERWICK, TOWN OF 230144 SACO, CITY OF 230155 BIDDEFORD, CITY OF 230145 SANFORD, CITY OF 230156 BUXTON, TOWN OF 230146 SHAPLEIGH, TOWN OF 230198 CORNISH, TOWN OF 230147 SOUTH BERWICK, TOWN OF 230157 DAYTON, TOWN OF 230148 WATERBORO, TOWN OF 230199 ELIOT, TOWN OF 230149 WELLS, TOWN OF 230158 HOLLIS, TOWN OF 230150 YORK, TOWN OF 230159 KENNEBUNK, TOWN OF 230151 KENNEBUNKPORT, TOWN OF 230170 KITTERY, TOWN OF 230171 LEBANON, TOWN OF 230193 LIMERICK, TOWN OF 230194 LIMINGTON, TOWN OF 230152 LYMAN, TOWN OF 230195 NEWFIELD, TOWN OF 230196 NORTH BERWICK, TOWN OF 230197 EFFECTIVE: FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 23005CV001A Version Number 2.3.2.1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Volume 1 Page SECTION 1.0 – INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 The National Flood Insurance Program 1 1.2 Purpose of this Flood Insurance Study Report 2 1.3 Jurisdictions Included in the Flood Insurance Study Project 2 1.4 Considerations for using this Flood Insurance Study Report 20 SECTION 2.0 – FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS 31 2.1 Floodplain Boundaries 31 2.2 Floodways 43 2.3 Base Flood Elevations 44 2.4 Non-Encroachment Zones 44 2.5 Coastal Flood Hazard Areas 45 2.5.1 Water Elevations and the Effects of Waves 45 2.5.2 Floodplain Boundaries and BFEs for Coastal Areas 46 2.5.3 Coastal High Hazard Areas 47 2.5.4 Limit of Moderate Wave Action 48 SECTION
    [Show full text]
  • Maine DOT Historic Bridge Survey, Phase II Final Report & Historic
    Maine State Library Digital Maine Transportation Documents Transportation 8-2004 Maine DOT Historic Bridge Survey, Phase II Final Report & Historic Context. 2004 Lichtenstein Consulting Engineers Maine Department of Transportation Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalmaine.com/mdot_docs Recommended Citation Lichtenstein Consulting Engineers and Maine Department of Transportation, "Maine DOT Historic Bridge Survey, Phase II Final Report & Historic Context. 2004" (2004). Transportation Documents. 33. https://digitalmaine.com/mdot_docs/33 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the Transportation at Digital Maine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Transportation Documents by an authorized administrator of Digital Maine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maine DOT Historic Bridge Survey Phase II Final Report & Historic Context Free/Black Bridge, Brunswick #0323. Photo Courtesy MHPC. Prepared by Lichtenstein Consulting Engineers August 2004 PHASE II OF THE HISTORIC BRIDGE SURVEY - FINAL REPORT Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................... iv Section I. Methodology for Field Inspection, Research, and Evaluation ...................I-1 Field Inspection ............................................................I-1 Research ................................................................I-2 Determining Eligibility .......................................................I-3 Criteria for Determining Significance ............................................I-4
    [Show full text]
  • THE MAINE LOBSTERING UNION, #L-28319-4E-C-N, #L-28319-L6-D-N; #L-28319-TW-E-N; WAYNE CANNING, and Air: #A-1146-71-A-N DAVID BLACK
    STATE OF MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BOARD OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION IN RE: APPLICATION OF NORDIC AQUAFARMS, INC. PETITION TO INTERVENE MPDES PERMIT: #ME0002771, #W009200-6F-A-N; FILED ON BEHALF OF NRPA and SLODA: #L-28319-26-A-N, #L-28319-TG-B-N, THE MAINE LOBSTERING UNION, #L-28319-4E-C-N, #L-28319-L6-D-N; #L-28319-TW-E-N; WAYNE CANNING, AND Air: #A-1146-71-A-N DAVID BLACK City of Belfast and Town of Northport, Waldo County Submitted: July 10, 2019 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Maine Lobstering Union (“IMLU”), a cooperative corporation, organized and doing business in the State of Maine; Wayne Canning, Zone D Lobster Council Representative for District 11 Lobstermen and a Maine commercial lobster and crab fishing license holder; and David Black, a Maine commercial lobster and crab fishing license holder fishing in Belfast Bay and Penobscot Bay out of Belfast, Maine (hereinafter “the Petitioners”), pursuant to 5 M.R.S.A. § 9054(1) and 06- 096 C.M.R. ch. 3 §11(A)(1), petition to intervene as parties in all proceedings before the Board of Environmental Protection (“BEP” or “the Board”) relating to the above-referenced applications, filed by Nordic Aquafarms, Inc. (“Nordic”). NAF proposes to construct and operate a land-based salmon fish breeding, maturation and processing plant, on land of or adjacent to the Belfast Water District and adjacent to the Little River (“the Project”), with intake and discharge pipelines located in Belfast Bay and Penobscot Bay within the municipal boundaries of Belfast and Northport, Maine. This facility, as proposed, is an existential economic and environmental threat to Penobscot Bay, the Pen-Bay lobster fishery, and all lobstermen of Zones C and D who fish in or around Belfast Bay and Penobscot Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • February 03,1910
    The Republican Journai „ VOLUME FEBRUARY 8, 1010. 82._ BELFAST, MAINE, THURSDAY, ^ UM~ of the Contents of Today s Journal. Portland Paragraphs. building as a whole it may be said that, both as to externals, and so far as the arrange- PERSONAL. PERSONAL. State Convention.. .Wed- ment of Republican Annual Meeting of the Maine Press the interior construction and decora- ding Bells...Portland Paragraphs... tion Wm. Arthur are concerned, it Shales arrived home last week Virgil L. Hall was in Boston Meeting of Waldo County Grange... Association. represents the best type the past week of American from the of mi News of Belfast.. .Personal—Secret architecture. University Maine. business. a to Portland rail last week In making trip by This is Societies. but one of the group of Mrs. Frank W. Seldon of is Mr. and the conditions were so different from those buildings Haverhill, Mass., Mrs. James C. Durham left Waste Land..The Sel- that will form what the of Monday Reclaiming may well be called the guest her parents, Mr. and Mrs. L. E. for a visit in Boston. Passion of usual in mid-winter as to merit brief mention. zach Play. .University official section of Portland. The old McMahan. Maine Notes. ...Marooned Sixteen on the train the buildings Mrs. Arthur I. Brown Leaving Thursday morning on what is returned to Augusta About the Tariff. known as the “Central fire station Mrs. Arthur G. Days. .Lying river was found clear of Roberts left last Friday for a Monday after a week’s visit in this Passagassawaukeag now owned city.
    [Show full text]