INTEC Synthesis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

INTEC Synthesis The INTEC Project: Synthesis Report Integration and Naturalisation tests: the new way to European Citizenship A Comparative study in nine Member States on the national policies concerning integration and naturalisation tests and their effects on integration Financed by the European Integration Fund Tineke Strik, Anita Böcker, Maaike Luiten and Ricky van Oers December 2010 Radboud University Nijmegen The Netherlands 1 Contents Chapter 1. Research Purpose and Methodology 5 Tineke strik 1.1 Purpose of the Study 5 1.2 Methodology 7 1.3 Interviews 8 Chapter 2. Integration Tests Abroad 11 Tineke Strik 2.1 Organisation and Costs 11 2.2 Level and Content of the Test 16 2.3 Target Groups and Exemptions 17 2.4 Purposes of the Tests 21 2.5 Consequences of not passing the test 29 2.6 Effects of the Tests: Statistical Data 30 2.7 Effects of the Tests: Interview Results 33 2.8 Summary and Conclusions 38 Chapter 3. Integration Tests in the Country 45 Anita Böcker 3.1 Description of the Requirements 45 3.2 Preparation for the Examinations 51 3.3 Costs 52 3.4 Target Groups and Exemptions 53 3.5 Consequences of not passing the test 55 3.6 Purposes and Debates 57 3.7 Effects of the Requirements: Statistical Data 61 3.8 Effects of the Requirements: Interview Results 66 3.9 Summary and Conclusions 72 Chapter 4. Integration Tests in the Naturalisation Procedure 77 Maaike Luiten and Ricky van Oers 4.1 Description of the Tests 77 4.2 Preparation for the Tests and Costs 82 4.3 Exemptions 86 4.3.1 Exemptions on the Basis of Sufficient Integration 86 4.3.2 Exemptions on the Basis of age or an impediment 88 4.4 Purpose of the Tests 90 4.5 Consequences of not passing the Test 93 4.6 Effects of the Test: Statistical Data 93 4.7 Effects of the Tests: Interview Results 99 4.8 Summary and Conclusions 105 3 Chapter 5. Summary and Conclusions 109 Tineke Strik 5.1 From an Effort obligation to a Result obligation: an overview 109 5.2 Do Integration and Naturalisation tests Improve Integration? 114 5.3 Recommendations 117 Bibliography 119 National Rapporteurs 123 4 Chapter 1. Research Purpose and Methodology Tineke Strik 1.1 Purpose of the Study This report presents a comparative study of the policies, practice and data regarding the integration requirements of nine EU Member States. Language and integration tests as a condition for naturalisation and various types of legal residence permits are topical issues in several EU Member States. A number of common trends regarding the integration of immigrants from third-countries are visible. Firstly, several Member States have introduced compulsory integration courses and tests as a condition for admission for family reunification, permanent residence, or naturalisation. Secondly, in certain Member States there appears to be a trend to- wards formalisation of the language and integration requirements. The informal in- terview between an applicant and a civil servant as part of the naturalisation proce- dure has been replaced by a formalised test, which often coincides with a raising of the level of required knowledge of the language and of the host society. Thirdly, there appears to be a readiness among Member States to learn from the experiences of other Member States and to copy measures developed elsewhere in the EU. The exchange of information in the Justice and Home Affairs Council, the adoption of the Common Basic Principles on Integration in 2004 and of the Commission’s Common Agenda for Integration in 2005, and the informal meetings of EU Ministers responsi- ble for integration have contributed to the openness of experiences of other Member States. Furthermore, most Member States have recently been confronted with the question whether to introduce integration measures or integration conditions in the process of implementation of Directive 2003/86/EC on the right to family reunifica- tion and Directive 2003/109/EC on the status of long-term resident third-country na- tionals. Both directives make reference to the possibility of introducing integration measures or requiring immigrants to fulfil an integration condition in order to be en- titled to a certain status provided for in those directives. The introduction of the tests reflects a change in ideas on the relationship between legal status and integration. Although the imitative behaviour of the Member States with regard to integra- tion requirements is rapidly increasing, little is known of the actual effects of this ra- ther recent legislation. Mostly the national legislator mentions the integration of im- migrants in the host society as the main purpose of these requirements. Whether the introduction of these new ways of testing integration has actually contributed to bet- ter immigrant integration or whether the tests function as a mechanism for selection and exclusion is unknown. Exclusion results in migrants being denied admission to a certain Member State and not obtaining permanent residence status or naturalisation. It is also unclear to what extent being put through an integration test affects the be- haviour of potential applicants or how such a requirement is perceived by them. So far there have been few if any empirical studies on the actual effect and impact of the use of integration and naturalisation tests. 5 CHAPTER 2: TEST ABROAD The INTEC project has conducted a first evaluation of the recent paradigmatic change in policy concepts concerning integration in certain Member States. The project aimed to provide detailed and reliable information on the content and the impact of compulsory elements in national integration policies. The main research questions focused on the reasons for the introduction of the obligatory integration requirements, the way in which they had been developed and put into practice and the actual effects of the requirements on immigrants. Furthermore attention was paid to the differences between integration requirements with a voluntary and a compul- sory nature, the relationship between the different requirements in a Member State and the relationship between the integration requirements of the different Member States. Within the framework of the INTEC project, research was conducted on the national policy and practice concerning these tests and their effects in nine Member States: Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Latvia, the Nether- lands and the United Kingdom, Hungary and France.1 The rapporteurs of the two latter Member States conducted the research at their own expense, which forced them to limit the research to a more moderate scale.2 On the basis of these national reports, the Centre for Migration Law made a comparative study, which is laid out in this report. As this study has analysed the impact of compulsory elements in national integration policies, it allows judgement of the contribution of those tests to the inte- gration of the persons concerned and the possible intended and unintended effects of the introduction of the tests. The central aims of the INTEC project have been to collect, analyse and dissemi- nate accurate, systematic, and up-to-date information on the practices and effects of the integration and naturalisation tests in Member States that have introduced such tests. The outcome of this research enables public authorities, both at the national and local level, politicians, immigrants and their organisations as well as academics, journalists and members of the public to form an informed opinion on the different kinds of language and integration tests introduced in the Member States, their con- tribution to the integration of immigrants, the possible effects of the introduction of these tests and the arguments pro and contra such tests. In this sense the INTEC project may increase the Member States’ capacity to develop, implement, monitor and evaluate policies and measures for the integration of third-country nationals and stimulate transnational exchange of good and bad practices with regard to the inte- gration of these nationals. Furthermore, this project aims to disseminate the results of new policies of Member States, not only between the nine Member States concerned but also to all Member States. In order to ensure the dissemination of the research re- 1 As Denmark does not take part in the EU Justice and Home Affairs acquis, the Integration Fund was not able to finance the research conducted in this Member State. To enable the involvement of the experiences in Denmark, the Danish Institute for Human Rights has conducted half of the research at its own expense. The Dutch Centre for Migration Law has financed the other half of the expenses for the Danish research. 2 The French rapporteur was not able to conduct interviews and the Hungarian rapporteur used a limited number of interviews (but instead,of interviewing immigrants she assessed 100 files re- garding applications for permanent residence or citizenship). Both rapporteurs will not organise a national seminar on the outcome of their research. 6 CHAPTER 2: TEST ABROAD sults, the provisional conclusions of the comparative research will be presented at an international conference in October 2010. Furthermore, the rapporteurs in all the Member States involved have actively disseminated the outcome of their studies at a national seminar of stakeholders (immigrants, immigrant organisations, local and na- tional officials). 1.2 Methodology The basis of this comparative research is formed by the national reports on nine Member States. These national reports, which encompass more detailed information, are therefore a substantial part of the INTEC project. The authors of the reports are also responsible for the field research in their Member State.3 The researchers already had extensive research experience on this topic before the INTEC project started. Most of them had published widely on issues of integration, immigration or national- ity law in their home country, participated in comparative studies or had themselves conducted comparative studies on integration programmes covering several Member States.
Recommended publications
  • Barmscoll/Nagy J / J 2 Nagy,Ferenc, 1903-1979
    BARMsColl/Nagy J / J 2 Nagy, Ferenc, 1903-1979. Papers, 1940-1979. 39 linear ft. (a.21,500 Items In 93 boxes & 7 overslded folders) Biography: Ferenc Nagy was a founder of the Hungarian Smallholders' Party, and Prime Minister of Hungary from 1946 until 1947 when he was forced to resign by the Communists. The rest of his life was spent In the United States where he was active as an author, lecturer and leader of Hungarian emigre political organizations. Arrangement: Cataloged correspondence. Box 1; Arranged Correspondence, Boxes 1-22; Arranged Lecture Correspondence, Boxes 23-35; Arranged Manuscripts. Boxes 36- 44; Subject Files, Boxes 45-74; Clippings, Boxes 75-80; Printed Materials, Boxes 81-93. Oversize Material: Subject Files; Clippings; Printed Materials. Summary: The Ferenc Nagy Papers consist of correspondence, manuscripts, subject files and printed materials relating to Nagy's career and family. The earliest materials cover the period 1945 to 1947 when Nagy was leader of the Hungarian Smallholders' Party, and later Prime Minister of Hungary. Of special interest are first-hand accounts and commentaries on the circumstances surrounding his resignation in 1947. Materials from the years 1948-1954 concern Nagy's leadership of emigre organizations Including the Hungarian National Council, the Committee for a Free Europe, the Assembly of Captive European Nations and the International Peasant Union. Correspondence files contain one letter each from presidents Harry S. Truman, Richard M. Nixon, and Jimmy Carter, also voluminous correspondence with Hungarian emigre politicians Pal Auer, Gyorgy Bessenyey, Bela Fabian, Pal Fabry, Karoly Peyer, Bela Varga and others. Nagy was much in demand as a public speaker and author and the Papers Include completed texts and drafts of many of his speeches and articles.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropological Abstracts
    Anthropological Abstracts Cultural/Social Anthropology from German-speaking countries edited by Ulrich Oberdiek Volume 3.2004 ___________ LIT Contents Editorial 4 General/Theoretical/Historical Studies 9 Regional Studies Africa 133 The Americas 191 Asia 219 Australia & Oceania 261 Europe 267 Periodicals scanned 327 Author Index 295 Subject Index Editorial This reference journal is published once a year and announces most publications in the field of cultural/social anthropology from the German language area (Austria, Germany, Switzerland). Since many of these publications have been written in German, and most German publications are not included in major, English language abstracting services, Anthropological Abstracts (AA) offers an opportunity and convenient source of information for anthropologists who do not read German to become aware of anthropological publications in German- speaking countries. Included are journal articles, monographs, anthologies, exhibition catalogs, yearbooks, etc., published in German. Occasionally, publications in English, or French, are included as well if the publisher is less well-known and when it is likely that the publication will not be noted abroad. The present printed volume of Anthropological Abstracts (AA) (2.2003) includes no. www-4 of the internet version (www.anthropology-online.de ’ Anthropological Abstracts ’ no. 4.2003); the printed version has about 30% additional material, however. Starting from the present volume the layout (size of script etc.) has been changed to ensure better readability. Some technical remarks This reference journal uses a combined and flexible approach of representation: While in most cases abstracts are supplied, for some anthologies and journals (e.g., Zeitschrift für Kulturaustausch, Kea) - because of space limitations - the Current Contents principle is applied, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • HAS Centre for Social Sciences Institute for Minority Studies 1097 Budapest, Tóth Kálmán U
    HAS Centre for Social Sciences Institute for Minority Studies 1097 Budapest, Tóth Kálmán u. 4.; 1453 Budapest, Pf. 25. Tel.: 224–6790 E-mail: [email protected]; homepage: http://kisebbsegkutato.tk.mta.hu I. Main duties of the research unit in 2017 In 2017, in addition to the research priorities in the mid-term development plan for 2016-2019 as well as to the original research commitments, the deepening of the new research directions continued that were outlined in 2013, focusing primarily on the minority competences and the interdisciplinary researches on identity politics, while the main research areas of the Institute – the Roma and other nationalities in Hungary, Jewish communities, Hungarians living in the neighbouring states, and migrants in Hungary – have remained constant. The main results were published in various important monographs, edited books, and publications in foreign languages in prestigious journals. In cooperation with partner institutes, the monograph on the first results of GeneZys 2015 could be published, and a new, representative survey could be conducted on the main features of national identity in Hungary. As an extended continuation of the previous research among the Hungarians living in the UK, a new research was done about the situation of Hungarians in Germany. Researchers also attended a high number of international conferences which contributed to disseminate the research results to wider audiences. The roundtable discussion with prominent writers about capturing ethnic identity in both literature and science at the Researcher’s Night brought significant interest, too. Researchers successfully obtained two grants of the National Research, Development and Innovation Office (NKFIH, formerly OTKA): one major research projects aims to examine the trajectories, outcomes as well as the hidden costs of educational mobility in multi-ethnic context, while the other junior research project focuses on the attempts on the institutionalization of ethnic economy among Hungarians in Romania and Slovakia.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnic and Linguistic Context of Identity: Finno-Ugric Minorities
    ETHNIC AND LINGUISTIC CONTEXT OF IDENTITY: FINNO-UGRIC MINORITIES Uralica Helsingiensia5 Ethnic and Linguistic Context of Identity: Finno-Ugric Minorities EDITED BY RIHO GRÜNTHAL & MAGDOLNA KOVÁCS HELSINKI 2011 Riho Grünthal, Magdolna Kovács (eds): Ethnic and Linguistic Context of Identity: Finno-Ugric Minorities. Uralica Helsingiensia 5. Contents The articles in this publication are based on presentations given at the sympo- sium “Ethnic and Linguistic Context of Identity: Finno-Ugric Minorities” held at the University of Helsinki in March, 2009. Layout, cover Anna Kurvinen Riho Grünthal & Magdolna Kovács Cover photographs Riho Grünthal Introduction 7 Map on page 269 Arttu Paarlahti Maps on pages 280, 296, and 297 Anna Kurvinen Johanna Laakso Being Finno-Ugrian, Being in the Minority ISBN 978-952-5667-28-8 (printed) – Reflections on Linguistic and Other Criteria 13 ISBN 978-952-5667-61-5 (online) Orders • Tilaukset Irja Seurujärvi-Kari ISSN 1797-3945 Tiedekirja www.tiedekirja.fi “We Took Our Language Back” Vammalan Kirjapaino Oy Kirkkokatu 14 [email protected] – The Formation of a Sámi Identity within the Sámi Sastamala 2011 FI-00170 Helsinki fax +358 9 635 017 Movement and the Role of the Sámi Language from the 1960s until 2008 37 Uralica Helsingiensia Elisabeth Scheller Uralica Helsingiensia is a series published jointly by the University of Helsinki Finno-Ugric The Sámi Language Situation Language Section and the Finno-Ugrian Society. It features monographs and thematic col- in Russia 79 lections of articles with a research focus on Uralic languages, and it also covers the linguistic and cultural aspects of Estonian, Hungarian and Saami studies at the University of Helsinki.
    [Show full text]
  • General Conference, Universität Hamburg, 22 – 25 August 2018
    NEW OPEN POLITICAL ACCESS JOURNAL RESEARCH FOR 2018 ECPR General Conference, Universität Hamburg, 22 – 25 August 2018 EXCHANGE EDITORS-IN-CHIEF Alexandra Segerberg, Stockholm University, Sweden Simona Guerra, University of Leicester, UK Published in partnership with ECPR, PRX is a gold open access journal seeking to advance research, innovation and debate PRX across the breadth of political science. NO ARTICLE PUBLISHING CHARGES THROUGHOUT 2018–2019 General Conference bit.ly/introducing-PRX 22 – 25 August 2018 General Conference Universität Hamburg, 22 – 25 August 2018 Contents Welcome from the local organisers ........................................................................................ 2 Mayor’s welcome ..................................................................................................................... 3 Welcome from the Academic Convenors ............................................................................ 4 The European Consortium for Political Research ................................................................... 5 ECPR governance ..................................................................................................................... 6 ECPR Council .............................................................................................................................. 6 Executive Committee ................................................................................................................ 7 ECPR staff attending .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tibor Frank COHORTING, NETWORKING, BONDING: MICHAEL POLANYI in EXILE
    Tibor Frank COHORTING, NETWORKING, BONDING: MICHAEL POLANYI IN EXILE Michael Polanyi was nurtured in the “happy peace times” of turn-of-the-century Europe. In a review of F. A. Hayek’s The Road to Serfdom for The Spectator in 1944 he fondly remembered the “good old days” when before 1914 you could travel across all the countries of Europe without a passport and settle down in any place you pleased without a permit. The measure of political tolerance which commonly prevailed in those days can be best assessed by remembering local conditions which at the time were considered as exceptionally bad. The domineering and capricious personal régime of Wilhelm II was widely resented, even though it allowed, for example, the popular satirical paper, Simplicissimus, regularly to print the most biting cartoons, jokes and verse directed against the Kaiser. Europe shuddered at the horrors of Tsarist oppression, though under it Tolstoy could continue to attack from his country seat in Yasnaya Polyana with complete impunity the Tsar and the Holy Synod, and persistently preach disobedience against the fundamental laws of the State… After less than a generation, say in 1935, we find that all the freedom and tolerance which only a few years earlier had been so confidently taken for granted, has vanished over the main parts of Europe.1 After World War I the situation fundamentally and dramatically changed, particularly for Polanyi’s generation. New borders were established, cutting across the continent of Europe. Through much of the post-World War I era, Hungarian Jews were repeatedly in trouble.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnic and Class Identity Formation Within the Germans of Hungary
    ETHNIC AND CLASS IDENTITY FORMATION WITHIN THE GERMANS OF HUNGARY Balázs A. Szelényi The National Council for Eurasian and East European Research 910 17th Street, N.W. Suite 300 Washington, D.C. 20006 TITLE VIII PROGRAM Project Information* Principal Investigator: Balázs Szelényi Council Contract Number: 818-15g Date: October 22, 2004 Copyright Information Individual researchers retain the copyright on their work products derived from research funded through a contract or grant from the National Council for Eurasian and East European Research (NCEEER). However, the NCEEER and the United States Government have the right to duplicate and disseminate, in written and electronic form, reports submitted to NCEEER to fulfill Contract or Grant Agreements either (a) for NCEEER’s own internal use, or (b) for use by the United States Government, and as follows: (1) for further dissemination to domestic, international, and foreign governments, entities and/or individuals to serve official United States Government purposes or (2) for dissemination in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act or other law or policy of the United States Government granting the public access to documents held by the United States Government. Neither NCEEER nor the United States Government nor any recipient of this Report may use it for commercial sale. * The work leading to this report was supported in part by contract or grant funds provided by the National Council for Eurasian and East European Research, funds which were made available by the U.S. Department of State under Title VIII (The Soviet-East European Research and Training Act of 1983, as amended). The analysis and interpretations contained herein are those of the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Vademecum – Jelenkortörténet Magyarország
    VADEMECUM – JELENKORTÖRTÉNET MAGYARORSZÁG VADEMECUM – CONTEMPORARY HISTORY HUNGARY VADEMECUM – JELENKORTÖRTÉNET MAGYARORSZÁG Vezérfonal az archívumokhoz, kutatási intézményekhez, könyvtárakhoz, egyesületekhez, múzeumokhoz és emlékhelyekhez Szerkesztő: Rainer M. János, M. Topits Judit, Ulrich Mählert VADEMECUM – CONTEMPORARY HISTORY HUNGARY A guide to archives, research institutions, libraries, associations, museums and places of memorial Edited by: János M. Rainer, Judit M. Topits, Ulrich Mählert Berlin – Budapest 2005 4 Rainer M. János, M. Topits Judit, Ulrich Mählert: Vademecum Jelenkortörténet Magyarország. Vezérfonal az archívumokhoz, kutatási intézményekhez, köny- vtárakhoz, egyesületekhez, múzeumokhoz és emlékhelyekhez. Vademecum Contemporary History Hungary A guide to archives, research institutions, libraries, associations, museums and places of memorial Fordítás | Translated by Brian McLean A Stiftung zur Aufarbeitung der SED-Diktatur megbízásából az 1956-os Magyar Forradalom Történetének Dokumentációs és Kutatóintézete Közalapítvány On behalf of the Foundation for Exploration of the Socialist Unity Party of Germany’s Dictatorship and the Foundation for the Institute for the History of the 1956 Hungarian Revolution Megrendelési cím | Address for orders Az 1956-os Magyar Forradalom Történetének Dokumentációs és Kutatóintézete Közalapítvány | The Institute for the History of the 1956 Hungarian Revolution Dohány utca 74. H 1074 Budapest Tel.: (0036) 1 / 322 52 28; 322 40 26 Fax: (0036) 1 / 322 30 84 [email protected] www.rev.hu Stiftung zur Aufarbeitung der SED-Diktatur | Foundation for the Reappraisal of SED-Dictatorship Otto-Braun-Str. 70/72 D 10178 Berlin Telephone: (0049) 030 / 23 24 7200 Fax: (0049) 030 / 23 24 7210 www.stiftung-aufarbeitung.de [email protected] Ár | Price 6,00 Euro Első kiadás | First edition 2005 Budapest, Berlin ©2005 Szedés és tördelés | Typesetting and layout Thomas Klemm, Leipzig © 2005 5 TARTALOM | CONTENT Bevezetés | Introduction .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • "A Beautiful Future for Central Europe:" Hungary's Regional Policy
    No. 28 (7 6), Octo ber 2013 © PISM Editors: Marcin Zaborowski (Editor-in-Chief) . Wojciech Lorenz (Managing Editor) Jarosław Ćwiek-Karpowicz . Artur Gradziuk . Piotr Kościński Roderick Parkes . Marcin Terlikowski . Beata Wojna “A Beautiful Future for Central Europe:” Hungary’s Regional Policy 1 in the Period 2010–2013 Dariusz Kałan Prime Minister Viktor Orbán has, from the beginning of his tenure, made public declarations of his deep engagement with cooperation in the region, and outlined very ambitious visions about its future. The idea to make 2013, the year of Hungary’s presidencies of the Visegrad Group and the Central European Initiative, a Central European year, is a part of the policy of special attachment to regional matters too. However, there is a visible gap between politicians’ rhetoric and their activity. This is especially true regarding Hungary’s dialogue with Romania and Slovakia, which, due to many historical, social and psychological obstacles, has always been most challenging for leaders in Budapest. Orbán’s government, though, by taking steps to culturally and politically unify Hungarians from the Carpathian Basin, promoting historically ambiguous persons and inviting revisionists such as Erika Steinbach to parliament, not only fails to engender a good atmosphere in the region, but also proves how lively among the country’s governing elite are both resentments from the past and temptations to use them to achieve temporary political goals. A Great Vision: Central Europe as the New Heart of the Continent? When, almost 80 years ago, Polish journalist Konrad Wrzos asked Hungary’s head of state regent Miklós Horthy, what the country’s policy in the region was, the response was: “Our geographic position is of the kind that, without us, nothing in the Carpathian Basin, neither from the political nor economic point of view, can be done.” 2 Today, although the geopolitical situation of both Hungary and the region have improved unequivocally, the current leadership of the country could actually say the same.
    [Show full text]
  • Historicizing European Identity a Thesis Submitted
    EUROPEANIZATION OF MINORITIES VS. MINORITIES OF EUROPEANIZATION: HISTORICIZING EUROPEAN IDENTITY A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY HAKAN ÖVÜNÇ ONGUR IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AUGUST 2011 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences ______________________ Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunışık Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ______________________ Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Bağcı Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ______________________ Prof. Dr. A. Nuri Yurdusev Supervisor Examining Committee Members Assoc. Prof. Dr. Aylin Güney (Yaşar U., IR) ______________________ Prof. Dr. A. Nuri Yurdusev (METU, IR) ______________________ Prof. Dr. Çınar Özen (Ankara U., IR) ______________________ Assoc. Prof. Dr. Oktay F. Tanrısever (METU, IR) ______________________ Assoc. Prof. Dr. Zana Ç. Aytürk (METU, IR) ______________________ PLAGIARISM I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last Name : Hakan Övünç Ongur Signature : iii ABSTRACT EUROPEANIZATION OF MINORITIES VS. MINORITIES OF EUROPEANIZATION: HISTORICIZING EUROPEAN IDENTITY Ongur, Hakan Övünç Ph.D., Department of International Relations Supervisor: Prof. Dr. A.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan Copyright By
    This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 67-16, 299 LENZ, Henry, 1934- THE GERMAN CULTURAL INFLUENCE IN HUNGARY BEFORE THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. The Ohio State University, Ph. D. , 1967 Education, history University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan Copyright by Henry Lenz 1S67 THE GERMAN CULTURAL INFLUENCE IN HUNGARY BEFORE THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY DISSERTATION Presented In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy In the Graduate School of The Ohio State University by Henry Lenz, B.S., M.A. ****** The Ohio State University 1967 Approved by Adviser School of Education acknowledgments I wish to acknowledge with sincere gratitude the assistance and guidance of Professor Robert B. Sutton, who, as my major adviser for my graduate program, unselfishly gave many hours of his time to help prepare this study. His advise and counsel led my research into areas not contem­ plated at the outset but without which this document would be incomplete. Dr. Sutton's historical skill and help deserve more credit than the acknowledgment given here can express. For viewing and excerpcing many foreign publications for my use, 1 am greatly indebted to Professor Doctor Johann Weidlein of Schorndorf, Würtemberg, Germany. His continuous interest in this study enabled me to secure many valuable publications otherwise unobtainable in this country. Dr. Weidlein's knowledge of the German cultural influence in Hungary has been a significant help in preparing this study. His aid is sincerely acknowledged. I also wish to express my special appreciation to my wife, Linda. Her help in editing and revising major portions of this work and interest in my study enabled me to make progress when seemingly I had reached an impasse.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Are the Germans?
    WHO ARE THE GERMANS? THEIR ANCIENT ROOTS AND FUTURE MIGHT Copyright © History Research Projects 1983, 1990, 1994, 2001 GPO Box 864, Sydney, NSW 2001 [email protected] 1 Who are the Germans? O, Assyrian! The rod of Mine anger, and the staff in their hand is Mine indignation. I will send him against an hypocritical nation and against the people of My wrath will I give him a charge. .it is in his heart to cut off nations not a few. (Isaiah10:5-7) 2 Who are the Germans? CONTENTS Foreword 5 1. Mysterious Origins of the Assyrians 8 2. The Fearsome Assyrians 17 3. Migrations Into Central Europe 26 4. The Hittite Empire 34 5. The Modern Assyro-Hittites 41 6. What is Germany's Destiny? 49 7. The Future of Germany 60 Bibliography 70 Appendix 1 A List of Important Biblical References to the Assyrians 76 Appendix 2 A List of Researchers Who Believe in the Assyrian or Hittite Origins of the Germans 76 Appendix 3 The Khattie Tribe of North-West India 78 Appendix 4 A Short Commentary on the Book of Nahum 79 Appendix 5 Charts on the Chronology of Genesis and the Generations of the Patriarchs 83 3 Who are the Germans? LIST OF CHARTS 1. Assur's Ancestry 6 2. The Royal House of Akkad 7 3. Kings of Nineveh 10 4. List of the Early Kings of Assyria 14 5. List of the Latter Kings of Assyria 24 6. Early Kings of Germany 32 7. The Hittite Kings 40 8. Chronology of Genesis 83 9.
    [Show full text]