New Fruits Produced at the University of Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

New Fruits Produced at the University of Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm Bulletin 230 July 1926 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION NEW FRUITS PRODUCED AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FRUIT BREEDING FARM W. H. ALDERMAN DIVISION OF HORTICULTURE LATHAM RASPBERRY UNIVERSITY FARM, ST. PAUL CONTENTS Page Introduction . 5 Hybrid plums . 8 Anoka (Minn. No. u8) . 8 Elliot (Minn. No. 8) ............................................... 9 Goldenrod (Minn. No. 120) ......................................... IO Hennepin (Minn. No. 132) ......................................... II La Crescent (Minn. Ko. 109) ........................................ 12 Mendota (Minn. No. 5) ............................................ 13 Monitor (Minn. No. 70) ............................................ 14 Mound (Minn. No. 50) ............................................. 16 Radisson (Minn. No. 157) ......................................... 17 Red Wing (Minn. No. 12) ......................................... 18 Tonka (Minn. No. 21) ............................................. 19 Underwood (Minn. Ko. 91) ......................................... 21 Waconia (Minn. No. ro)............................................ 22 Winona (Minn. No. 30)............................................. 23 Plum-cherry hybrids . 24 Nicollet (Minn. Ko. 144)............................................ 24 St. Anthony (Minn. Ko. 145)........................................ 25 Zumbra ............................................................. 26 Apples . 28 Folwell (Minn. No. 237)............................................. 28 Haralson (Minn. No. 90)............................................ 29 Minnehaha (Minn. No. 300) ........................................ 31 Wedge (Minn. No. 207)............................................. 32 Strawberries ........................................................... 32 Chaska (Minn. No. 801) ............................................ 33 Easypicker (Minn. No. 775)........................................ 34 Minnehaha (Minn. Ko. 935)......................................... 35 Minnesota (Minn. No. 3) ........................................... ·' 37 Nokomis (Minn. No. 489)........................................... 38 Everbearing strawberries . 39 Deephaven (Minn. No. 41).......................................... 39 Duluth (Minn. No. 1017)............................................ 40 Raspberries . 41 Latham (Minn. No. 4).............................................. 41 Gooseberries . 42 Como (Minn. No. 43).......................................... ... 42 Pears . 44 Minn. Ko. r......................................................... 44 Ornamentals . 45 Manitou (Minn. No. 7).............................................. 45 Newport (Minn. No. II6)............................................ 47 In the collection of data and information regarding the fruits herein described the author gratefully acknowledges the valuable assistance of Charles Haralson, fonner superintendent of the Fruit Breeding Farm; Dr. M. J. Dorsey, formerly in charge of the section of horticultural crop breeding; Dr. J. H. Beaumont, present head of this section; F. E. Haralson, assistant superintendent of the Fruit Breeding Farm; and A. N. Wilcox, instructor in horticultural crop breeding. NEW FRUITS PRODUCED AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FRUIT BREEDING FARM w. H. ALDERMAN1 INTRODUCTION Because of the severe winter conditions characteristic of the upper Mississippi Valley, Minnesota has been unable to utilize, except in a limited way, standard varieties of fruit grown in other regions. This situation has not only encouraged but has made necessary the pro­ duction of new varieties adapted to local conditions. The early set­ tlers soon became convinced of this fact and turned their attention to the growing of seedlings in large numbers, hoping to derive from them hardier and better adapted varieties. This movement was fos­ tered by the Minnesota State Horticultural Society, which at times distributed considerable numbers of apple seeds to its members for planting. As a result of this movement, scores of meritorious new varieties were brought into existence and a dozen or more growers attained distinction as originators of new fruits. The most outstanding production of this early period was the Wealthy apple, produced as a seedling by Peter Gideon, on his little farm overlooking the waters of Lake Minnetonka. The commonwealth of Minnesota soon recognized the value of fruit breeding work and gave official and financial support to the enterprise. The first state fruit breeding farm was established on Lake Minnetonka near Excelsior, in the spring of 1878, with Peter M. Gideon appointed by the the governor as superintendent. This station was continued until l88g, when by act of the legislature the property was sold and the station was abandoned. In the meantime, in the spring of 1887, by act of the state legislature, a small tract of land was set aside from the property of the State Public School at Owa­ tonna, to be used as an Experimental Tree Station. This station was administered through the University of Minnesota and continued in operation until 1925. E. H. S. Dartt was for many years the super­ intendent and grew a large number of seedling apples besides con­ ducting variety trials and some cultural studies. Mr. Dartt was sue- 6 MINNESOTA BULLETIN 230 ceeded by Hon. Thomas E. Cashman. During the latter years of its history, the Owatonna station was largely devoted to variety trials. In the spring of 1907 the state legislature appropriated $16,000 for the purchase of a fruit breeding farm for the state university and established an annual appropriation of $2000 for its care and management. During the ensuing summer the Board of Regents of the University purchased 77.89 acres of land near Zumbra Heights, about five miles west of Excelsior. Some necessary buildings were erected during the fall and winter, permitting the active work in fruit breeding to be started in the spring of 1908. The work of establishing and operating the farm was under the supervision of Samuel B. Green, horticulturist of the Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station. Charles Haralson was appointed resident superintendent of the station and held this position until January, 1923; Fred E. Haralson, Much of the fruit breeding work is done in the greenhouses the present assistant superintendent, succeeding him. Additional land was purchased in 1920, making the total acreage 109.87 acres. That the present fruit breeding farm has been successful in the production of improved fruits is indicated by the fact that thirty-two new and valuable varieties have already been named and introduced. These, together with a promising seedling pear which has been distributed but not named, are described in detail in this bulletin. FRUITS PRODUCED AT FRUIT BREEDING FARM 7 A summary of these introductions discloses the following distribution into groups : Plums ............................... 14 varieties Plum-cherry hybrids .................. 3 Apples .............................. 4 " Strawberries (spring fruiting) ......... 5 Strawberries (Everbearing) ........... 2 " Red raspberries ...................... 1 variety Gooseberries ......................... " Ornamentals 2 varieties 32 " Fruit breeding in the orchards is carried on as extensively as weather conditions will permit Many of these varieties are rapidly becoming accepted as standards in this and adjoining states. The plums are being planted on a com­ mercial scale. The Minnehaha strawberry is proving one of the best money-makers in most of the sections where it is grown. The Duluth Everbearing strawberry is accepted as a standard in northern Minne­ sota and Manitoba. The Latham red raspberry has largely displaced all other varieties formerly grown in the state, with the exception of King, and greatly exceeds that variety in state-wide popularity. The wealth accruing to the state each year from the products of these thirty-two varieties far exceeds the total cost of all the state-supported fruit breeding experiments since the establishment of the first farm in 1878. In fact, the 1926 illcome from the Latham raspberry alone will be more than adequate for such a purpose. Except in a few cases where reduction was necessary, all the fruits illustrated in this publication are shown in natural size. In no cases have enlargements been made. 8 MINNESOTA BULLETIN 230 HYBRID PLUMS These fruits are to be distinguished from the smaller fruited and bushlike plum-cherry hybrids. The plum hybrids listed are all hardy, large-fruited forms produced at the University of Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm from crosses between some form of the Japanese plum (Prunus salacina) and some of the hardy species native to the upper Mississippi Valley. Many of the varieties described produce fruits two inches in diameter, beautifully colored, and high in quality. They form a valuable and interesting addition to the list of hardy fruits and are of much promise for both home and commercial purposes. ANOKA Anoka (Minn. No. II8) Prunus salicina X Pru,nus americana Anoka has not been distributed as extensively, by either the Experi­ ment Station or commercial nurseries, as most of the other plums. For this reason its value is not well determined. Its productivity and fine showy fruits should make it worthy of more extended trial for both home and market use. Anoka originated from seed of Burbank pollinated by De Soto, the cross having been made in 1913. The first fruits were borne in 1918 and the variety was named and introduced to the nnrsery trade
Recommended publications
  • Giresun Ve İlçelerinde Yetiştirilen Yerel Erik Çeşitlerinin Pomolojik Ve Morfolojik Özeliklerinin Belirlenmesi
    Araştırma Makalesi Ziraat Mühendiliği (372), 101-115 DOI: 10.33724/zm.956357 Giresun ve İlçelerinde Yetiştirilen Yerel Erik Çeşitlerinin Pomolojik ve Morfolojik Özeliklerinin Belirlenmesi The Determination of Pomological and Morphological Properties of The Local Plum Types Grown in Giresun and Districts ÖZET Canan ÖNCÜL1 Ahmet AYGÜN2* Bu araştırma Giresun ili Merkez, Bulancak, Keşap İlçelerinde 2016-2017 yılları arasında yürütülmüştür. Çalışma yapılan 1 T.C. Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı, Giresun İl alanda 20 farklı isimde anılan yerel erik çeşidi belirlenmiştir. Müdürlüğü, Giresun Belirlenen erik çeşitlerinin ağaç özellikleri ve meyve özellikleri 0000-0001-9270-7051 tespit edilmiştir. Belirlenen yerel erik çeşitlerinin ortalama meyve ağırlığı 8.02-169.40 g, meyve eni 20.65-42.06 mm, meyve boyu 2Kocaeli Üniversitesi, Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi, Biy- oloji Bölümü, 41380, Kocaeli, Türkiye/ Kırgızistan 25.42-42.89 mm, meyve yüksekliği 23.33-43.67 mm, meyve Türkiye Manas Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, sapı uzunluğu 11.63-17.64 mm, meyve sapı çapı 0.80-2.53 mm, Bahçe ve Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü, 720044, Bişkek, çekirdek ağırlığı 0.31-1.61 g, titre edilebilir asitlik %1.15-2.83, Kırgızistan. pH 2.13-3.83, suda çözünebilir kuru madde miktarının %7.12- 0000-0001-7745-3380 18.47 olarak değişim gösterdiği tespit edilmiştir. Erik çeşitlerinde tomurcuk kabarması 25 Ocak-18 Mart tarihleri arasında, tomurcuk patlaması 8 Şubat-23 Mart tarihleri arasında, İlk Sorumlu Yazar * : [email protected] çiçeklenme 20 Şubat-27 Mart tarihleri arasında, tam çiçeklenme 1 Mart ile 9 Nisan tarihleri arasında, çiçeklenme sonu 10 Mart- 20 Nisan tarihleri arasında gerçekleşmiştir. Eriklerin hasat tarihleri ise 18 Haziran-31 Ağustos tarihleri arasında 75 günlük bir periyotta dağılım göstermiştir.
    [Show full text]
  • Number 3, Spring 1998 Director’S Letter
    Planning and planting for a better world Friends of the JC Raulston Arboretum Newsletter Number 3, Spring 1998 Director’s Letter Spring greetings from the JC Raulston Arboretum! This garden- ing season is in full swing, and the Arboretum is the place to be. Emergence is the word! Flowers and foliage are emerging every- where. We had a magnificent late winter and early spring. The Cornus mas ‘Spring Glow’ located in the paradise garden was exquisite this year. The bright yellow flowers are bright and persistent, and the Students from a Wake Tech Community College Photography Class find exfoliating bark and attractive habit plenty to photograph on a February day in the Arboretum. make it a winner. It’s no wonder that JC was so excited about this done soon. Make sure you check of themselves than is expected to seedling selection from the field out many of the special gardens in keep things moving forward. I, for nursery. We are looking to propa- the Arboretum. Our volunteer one, am thankful for each and every gate numerous plants this spring in curators are busy planting and one of them. hopes of getting it into the trade. preparing those gardens for The magnolias were looking another season. Many thanks to all Lastly, when you visit the garden I fantastic until we had three days in our volunteers who work so very would challenge you to find the a row of temperatures in the low hard in the garden. It shows! Euscaphis japonicus. We had a twenties. There was plenty of Another reminder — from April to beautiful seven-foot specimen tree damage to open flowers, but the October, on Sunday’s at 2:00 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Mistletoes on Mmahgh J) Introduced Trees of the World Agriculture
    mmAHGH J) Mistletoes on Introduced Trees of the World Agriculture Handbook No. 469 Forest Service U.S. Department of Agriculture Mistletoes on Introduced Trees of the World by Frank G. Hawksworth Plant Pathologist Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Agriculture Handbook No. 469 Forest Service U.S. Department of Agriculture December 1974 CONTENTS Page Introduction ^ Mistletoes and Hosts 3 Host Index of Mistletoes 27 Literature Cited ^^ Library of Congress Catalog No. 74-600182 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington B.C. 20402 Price 75 cents Stock Number 0100-03303 MISTLETOES ON INTRODUCED TREES OF THE WORLD INTRODUCTION Spaulding (1961) published the first attempt at a worldwide inven- tory of the diseases of foreign (introduced) trees of the world. With the widespread introduction of trees to many parts of the world, it is becoming of increasing importance to know the susceptibility of trees introduced to new disease situations. Spaulding's comprehensive lists included forest tree diseases caused by fungi, bacteria, and viruses, but not the mistletoes. Therefore this publication on the mistletoes was prepared to supplement his work. Spaulding considered only forest trees, but the coverage here is expanded to include mistletoes parasitic on introduced forest, crop, orchard, and ornamental trees. In some instances, mistletoes are reported on trees cultivated within different parts of a country where the tree is native. Such records are included if it is indicated in the publication that the mistletoe in question is on planted trees. "Mistletoe" as used in this paper refers to any member of the fam- ilies Loranthaceae or Viscaceae.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ornamental Trees of South Dakota N.E
    South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange South Dakota State University Agricultural Bulletins Experiment Station 4-1-1931 The Ornamental Trees of South Dakota N.E. Hansen Follow this and additional works at: http://openprairie.sdstate.edu/agexperimentsta_bulletins Recommended Citation Hansen, N.E., "The Ornamental Trees of South Dakota" (1931). Bulletins. Paper 260. http://openprairie.sdstate.edu/agexperimentsta_bulletins/260 This Bulletin is brought to you for free and open access by the South Dakota State University Agricultural Experiment Station at Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Bulletins by an authorized administrator of Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Bulletin 260 April, 1931 The Ornamental Trees of South Dakota Figure I-The May Day Tree. Horticulture Department Agricultural Experiment Station South Dakota State College of Agriculture and Mechanic Arts Brookings, S. Dak. The Ornamental Trees of South Dakota N. E. Hansen This bulletin describes the deciduous trees. By deciduous trees is meant those that shed their leaves in winter. The evergreens of South Dakota are described in bulletin 254, October 1930. A bulletin on "The Ornamental Shrubs of South Dakota" is ready for early publication. The following list should be studied in connection with the trees described in South Dakota bulletin 246, "'The Shade, Windbreak and Timber Trees of South Dakota," 48 pages, March 1930. All the trees in both bulletins have ornamental value in greater or less degree.
    [Show full text]
  • Dictionary of Cultivated Plants and Their Regions of Diversity Second Edition Revised Of: A.C
    Dictionary of cultivated plants and their regions of diversity Second edition revised of: A.C. Zeven and P.M. Zhukovsky, 1975, Dictionary of cultivated plants and their centres of diversity 'N -'\:K 1~ Li Dictionary of cultivated plants and their regions of diversity Excluding most ornamentals, forest trees and lower plants A.C. Zeven andJ.M.J, de Wet K pudoc Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation Wageningen - 1982 ~T—^/-/- /+<>?- •/ CIP-GEGEVENS Zeven, A.C. Dictionary ofcultivate d plants andthei rregion so f diversity: excluding mostornamentals ,fores t treesan d lowerplant s/ A.C .Zeve n andJ.M.J ,d eWet .- Wageninge n : Pudoc. -11 1 Herz,uitg . van:Dictionar y of cultivatedplant s andthei r centreso fdiversit y /A.C .Zeve n andP.M . Zhukovsky, 1975.- Me t index,lit .opg . ISBN 90-220-0785-5 SISO63 2UD C63 3 Trefw.:plantenteelt . ISBN 90-220-0785-5 ©Centre forAgricultura l Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen,1982 . Nopar t of thisboo k mayb e reproduced andpublishe d in any form,b y print, photoprint,microfil m or any othermean swithou t written permission from thepublisher . Contents Preface 7 History of thewor k 8 Origins of agriculture anddomesticatio n ofplant s Cradles of agriculture and regions of diversity 21 1 Chinese-Japanese Region 32 2 Indochinese-IndonesianRegio n 48 3 Australian Region 65 4 Hindustani Region 70 5 Central AsianRegio n 81 6 NearEaster n Region 87 7 Mediterranean Region 103 8 African Region 121 9 European-Siberian Region 148 10 South American Region 164 11 CentralAmerica n andMexica n Region 185 12 NorthAmerica n Region 199 Specieswithou t an identified region 207 References 209 Indexo fbotanica l names 228 Preface The aimo f thiswor k ist ogiv e thereade r quick reference toth e regionso f diversity ofcultivate d plants.Fo r important crops,region so fdiversit y of related wild species areals opresented .Wil d species areofte nusefu l sources of genes to improve thevalu eo fcrops .
    [Show full text]
  • Phytogeographic Basis Plant Breeding
    PHYTOGEOGRAPHIC BASIS of PLANT BREEDING 1. Local Varieties and Their Significance :— The -varieties of cultivated plants grown in the different regions of the Soviet Union until recently were varieties introduced from various localities and countries, and were inseparable from human migration and colonization. The list of cultivated plants reflects the history of our country in its recent past, it shows the effects of individual peasant farming. In the separate groups and varieties of plants one can trace the routes by which they were brought from Western Europe, the United States, Asia Minor, Mongolia, and Iran. In the pre-revolutionary period, the introduction of new varieties in our country was haphazard. Beginning with the eighteenth century, individual amateur growers and societies unsystemati- cally introduced new varieties from abroad. Sometimes these new varieties were quite valuable but because of the vastness of our country and the com- plete absence of any state-planned system of plant introduction, the imported varieties usually restricted themselves to very limited areas and disappeared. It may be considered that pedigree seed production, in the real meaning of the term, did not exist in our country before the October Revolution. We have just begun a planned distribution of varieties in accordance with the needs of our large-scale socialized and mechanized agricultural economy. Yet, there is no doubt that the varietal materials which were introduced in our country and cultivated for decades and centuries were subjected to natural selection, and also to deliberate or casual artificial selection, and that some local varieties evolved that were ecologically adapted. The proximity of the Soviet Union to the basic centers of origin of numer- ous cultivated plants facilitated the selection of exceptionally valuable forms.
    [Show full text]
  • Asian Plum Diversity Based on Phenotypic Traits in Republic of Korea
    Korean J. Plant Res. 31(3):254-267(2018) Print ISSN 1226-3591 https://doi.org/10.7732/kjpr.2018.31.3.254 Online ISSN 2287-8203 Original Research Article Asian Plum Diversity Based on Phenotypic Traits in Republic of Korea Jung-Hyun Kwon*, Eun-Young Nam, Ji-Hae Jun, Kyeong-Ho Chung, Seok-Kyu Yun, Sung-Jong Kim and Yun-Soo Do Fruit Research Division, National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Korea Abstract - The phenotypic traits of 63 Asian plum varieties were investigated for three years to select those with superior qualities for breeding. Eight morphological characteristics of the flowers and fruits (e.g., stigma position, fruit skin, and flesh color) were evaluated. Phenological characteristics (e.g., blooming time and ripening time) were also monitored. Being useful traits for breeding, fruit quality factors (e.g., fruit weight, skin color, flesh color, soluble solids content, and titratable acidity) were evaluated as well. The majority of the fruits were cordate (36%) and circular (23%) in shape. Approximately 78% of the varieties showed a red skin color, whereas 67% had yellowish fruit flesh. Fruit ripening occurred from June 28th to September 5th, spanning 69 days. The average fruit weight and soluble solids content were 77.2 g and 12.2 °Brix, respectively. Regarding correlations among the characteristics, the most significant correlation coefficients were for the ripening time and fruit size parameters. Such information of Asian plum varieties will be useful for future breeding programs. Key words – Fruit breeding, Fruit quality, Germplasm, Prunus salicina Introduction as a link to other subgenera in Prunus and as the center of the Prunus genetic stage (Watkins, 1976).
    [Show full text]
  • Introgression of Prunus Species in Plum
    Introgression of Prunus Plums have great potential as a species in Plum commercial crop in regions outside of W. R. Okie California. The wide United States Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research range of native plum Service, Southeastern Fruit and Tree Nut Research Laboratory, species provides an 21 Dunbar Road, Byron, GA untapped source of genetic material. Results from hybridizations are “ ntrogression” is a big word meaning Origin introduction of the genes of one very unpredictable. This Ispecies into the gene pool of another. The ancestors of what we call paper describes some of This transfer can be a one-time thing, or Japanese plums actually originated in Figure 18. Apple mosaic virus is common on the Fuji variety. Figure 19. Bridge grafting is used to overcome if one parent is much better than the other, China. The term “Japanese plum” this intriguing girdling caused by Valsa mali cankers. it may involve repeated backcrossing of originally was applied to Prunus salicina germplasm maintained an interspecific hybrid with one of its imported from Japan in the late 19th parents (generally the one with better century, but now includes all the fresh at Byron, GA., and In Shandong province, we noted We were surprised to see so few some differences of opinion, and many fruit). Within Prunus, plums have had the market plums developed by intercrossing summarizes our efforts that tree trunks and scaffold limbs were pests in the orchards that we visited. It “what if” questions. However, none of most extensive mixing and matching of various diploid species with the original severely affected by Botryosphaeria appears that pest control technology in us would deny that China and Chinese species.
    [Show full text]
  • Testing and Evaluation of Plum and Plum Hybrid Cultivars Jerome L
    Testing and Evaluation of Plum and Plum Hybrid Cultivars Jerome L. Frecon and Daniel L. Ward New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station, Rutgers University Introduction & Methods these cultivars are commonly called prunes. A botanical species, Prunus insititia or damson plum, is one of these This report is a continuation of plum, and cultivars. Varieties of the American, or wild, plum grow interspecific hybrids research first started by the on spreading trees and produce small, round fruit of senior author in 1989 and continued through 2011. various colors. These later two species have not been The Japanese type plum varieties adapted to the extensively evaluated in New Jersey and thus will not milder temperate climates of the Northeastern US be discussed in this report. are of great diversity. Many of these plum varieties are the result of interspecifi c hybridization. Most Varieties plums described as Japanese are the result of crosses of the Japanese plum, Prunus salicina, with the The Japanese type varieties grown on available American plum, Prunus americana, or the Apricot rootstocks are generally short-lived and relatively plum or Simon plum, Prunus simonii. More recently unproductive (there are exceptions). The trees are easily the Chickasaw plum, Prunus angustifolia, has been stressed by many of the same problems affecting peach used by southern breeders to improve adaptability. trees, namely winter injury, spring frost, moisture stress, Generally, the Japanese type plum varieties grow on nematodes, root rots, and short life. Some Japanese upright spreading, or spreading to drooping trees and varieties also experience latent incompatibility with produce round to heart-shaped fruit (pronounced apex) available rootstocks and decline slowly.
    [Show full text]
  • Festschrift Für PETER HANELT –
    Schriften zu Genetischen Ressourcen Schriftenreihe des Informationszentrums für Genetische Ressourcen (IGR) Zentralstelle für Agrardokumentation und -information (ZADI) Band 4 Evolution und Taxonomie von pflanzen- genetischen Ressourcen – Festschrift für PETER HANELT – Tagungsband eines Internationalen Festkolloquiums anläßlich des 65. Geburtstages von Dr. Peter Hanelt am 5. und 6. Dezember 1995 in Gatersleben im Institut für Pflanzengenetik und Kulturpflanzenforschung Herausgeber dieses Bandes R. Fritsch und K. Hammer Herausgeber: Informationszentrum für Genetische Ressourcen (IGR) Zentralstelle für Agrardokumentation und -information (ZADI) Villichgasse 17, D – 53177 Bonn Postfach 20 14 15, D – 53144 Bonn Tel.: (0228) 95 48 - 210 Fax: (0228) 95 48 - 149 Email: [email protected] Schriftleitung: Dr. Frank Begemann Layout: Gabriele Blümlein Birgit Knobloch Druck: Druckerei Schwarzbold Inh. Martin Roesberg Geltorfstr. 52 53347 Alfter-Witterschlick Schutzgebühr 15,- DM ISSN 0948-8332 © ZADI Bonn, 1996 Inhalts- und Vortragsverzeichnis 1 Inhaltsverzeichnis .........................................................................................................i Abkürzungsverzeichnis............................................................................................... iii Eröffnung des Kolloquiums und Würdigung von Dr. habil. PETER HANELT zu seinem 65. Geburtstag ..........................................................................................1 Opening of the Colloquium and laudation to Dr. habil. PETER HANELT on the occasion of
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Japanese Plum-Type (Hybrids of P. Salicina) Accessions Assessed by SSR Markers
    agronomy Article Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Japanese Plum-Type (Hybrids of P. salicina) Accessions Assessed by SSR Markers Brenda I. Guerrero 1,2,* , M. Engracia Guerra 3, Sara Herrera 1,2, Patricia Irisarri 1,2 , Ana Pina 1,2 and Javier Rodrigo 1,2 1 Unidad de Hortofruticultura, Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria de Aragón (CITA), Avda. Montañana 930, 50059 Zaragoza, Spain; [email protected] (S.H.); [email protected] (P.I.); [email protected] (A.P.); [email protected] (J.R.) 2 Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón-IA2, CITA-Universidad de Zaragoza, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain 3 Departamento de Hortofruticultura, CICYTEX-Centro de Investigación ‘Finca La Orden-Valdesequera’, A-V, KM 372, 06187 Badajoz, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-976-716-307 Abstract: Japanese plum (Prunus salicina Lindl.) is widely distributed in temperate zones across the world. Since its introduction to USA in the late 19th century, this species has been hybridized with up to 15 different diploid Prunus species. This high level of introgression has resulted in a wide range of traits and agronomic behaviors among currently grown cultivars. In this work, 161 Japanese plum-type accessions were genotyped using a set of eight Simple Sequence Repeats (SSR) markers to assess the current genetic diversity and population structure. A total of 104 alleles were detected, with an average of 13 alleles per locus. The overall Polymorphic Informative Content (PIC) value of SSR markers was 0.75, which indicates that these SSR markers are highly polymorphic. The Citation: Guerrero, B.I.; Guerra, M.E.; Herrera, S.; Irisarri, P.; Pina, A.; Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic (UPGMA) dendrogram and the seven groups Rodrigo, J.
    [Show full text]
  • Intoduction to Ethnobotany
    Intoduction to Ethnobotany The diversity of plants and plant uses Draft, version November 22, 2018 Shipunov, Alexey (compiler). Introduction to Ethnobotany. The diversity of plant uses. November 22, 2018 version (draft). 358 pp. At the moment, this is based largely on P. Zhukovskij’s “Cultivated plants and their wild relatives” (1950, 1961), and A.C.Zeven & J.M.J. de Wet “Dictionary of cultivated plants and their regions of diversity” (1982). Title page image: Mandragora officinarum (Solanaceae), “female” mandrake, from “Hortus sanitatis” (1491). This work is dedicated to public domain. Contents Cultivated plants and their wild relatives 4 Dictionary of cultivated plants and their regions of diversity 92 Cultivated plants and their wild relatives 4 5 CEREALS AND OTHER STARCH PLANTS Wheat It is pointed out that the wild species of Triticum and rela­ted genera are found in arid areas; the greatest concentration of them is in the Soviet republics of Georgia and Armenia and these are regarded as their centre of origin. A table is given show- ing the geographical distribution of 20 species of Triticum, 3 diploid, 10 tetraploid and 7 hexaploid, six of the species are endemic in Georgia and Armenia: the diploid T. urarthu, the tetraploids T. timopheevi, T. palaeo-colchicum, T. chaldicum and T. carthlicum and the hexaploid T. macha, Transcaucasia is also considered to be the place of origin of T. vulgare. The 20 species are described in turn; they comprise 4 wild species, T. aegilopoides, T. urarthu (2n = 14), T. dicoccoides and T. chaldicum (2n = 28) and 16 cultivated species. A number of synonyms are indicated for most of the species.
    [Show full text]